The Vastu Yantra in Srisukta

[Guest guest]

Dear members,

 

The fifteen (15) riks of the Shri-Sukta has 8, 2, 7, 9, 8, 3, 7, 4, 7, 3, 5,

4, 5, 6, 3 numbers of “Râ€s respectively. The total of all the r-kAaras are

81. R-kAara is the Bija of Agni and hence there is a mode of worship of

Srisukta Yantra by meditating on Agni at the backdrop. Keeping in view these 81

r-kAras, a 9 x 9 matrix yantra is constructed which has 81 squares.

 

Based on this 9 x 9 matrix yantra of Sri Sukta, 45 parivara devatas related to

Vastoshpati is also worshipped which becomes Vastu Yantra.

 

Based on this 9 x 9 matrix yantra of Sri Sukta, Sitala Devi is worshipped for

good health of off springs.

 

As per the Navarna Mahameru Prasthara, there are corresponding Bija Mantras

for 9 principles ie., 1) Prithivi 2) Chandra 3) Siva 4) Maya 5) Sakthi 6) Agni

7) Kama 8) Ardha Chandra 9) BIndu.

 

Each of the Bija is taken and samputikarana is performed with the Sri Sukta

for the kamya prayogas. Every bija of Bala / Panchadasi / Shodasi is used as

Samputikarana with Srisukta for specific purposes. There is also a prayoga of

using Akarshana Bija and Pancha bAna Bijas (Ayudha Bijas) as a samputikarana

with Srisukta.

 

Based on the Sri Sukta, the Srichakra is created and this method has to be

learnt from one’s gurunatha alongwith the above-mentioned samputikarana and

prayogas.

 

It is interesting to note that in the entire matrika varna mala (vowels and

consonants), there are 81 ardha-matras which corresponds to 81 “râ€s of the

Srisukta. And hence the 1st chapter of Chandi says :

 

“ARDHA MAATRA STHITHA NITYA – yaanuccharyaa visheshatah

Tvameva sandhya savitri – tvam deva janani paraaâ€

 

Mother is the “Eternal Principle†as 81 ardha matras in the Matrika

Varnamala.

 

With regards,

sriram

 

 

 

Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.

 

 

[Guest guest]

shri gurubhyo namaH

shri mahAgaNapataye namaH

 

Friends:

 

There appears to be some paatha bhedana here...

 

Is it " tvam deva jananI parA " or is it " tvam devi jananI parA " .

The gita press gorakhpur book has it as " devi " , not " deva " .

The Shri Ramakrishna Matham book also has it as " devi " .

 

Please advise.

 

Thanks and Best Regards:

KR.

 

shri mAtre namaH

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

It is " devi janani paraa " . You are right. Thanks for the correction.

 

There is a patha bheda here. Some chant as " veda janani paraa " . If it

is veda janani, then mother is addressed as Gayatri. This meaning is

reflected in the next sloka as " tvameva sandhya savitri.. " which

describes the Gayatri swarupa.

 

I am happy that people are keenly observing my posts and pointing out

typing devils.

 

regs,

sriram

 

, " Kumar Ramachandran " <kramach

wrote:

>

> shri gurubhyo namaH

> shri mahAgaNapataye namaH

>

> Friends:

>

> There appears to be some paatha bhedana here...

>

> Is it " tvam deva jananI parA " or is it " tvam devi jananI parA " .

> The gita press gorakhpur book has it as " devi " , not " deva " .

> The Shri Ramakrishna Matham book also has it as " devi " .

>

> Please advise.

>

> Thanks and Best Regards:

> KR.

>

> shri mAtre namaH

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

shri gurubhyo namaH

shri mAtre namaH

 

Friends:

 

We do read everyone's posts with keen interest, don't we ? So, perhaps my bark

is worse than my bite, Shri Shriram ?

 

Thanks and regards.

KR.

 

shri mAtre namaH

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

shrI gurubhyo namaH

shrI mahAgaNapataye namaH

 

Friends:

 

I have also heard interpretations that " ardha maatraa " represents half of the

maatraa of the pranava. i.e., it represents (vocally) the last half of the

Omkaaraa or the sound " mmmm " or, it represents (typgraphically) the bindu

portion of the chandra bindu in the sanskrit version of the praNava. This is not

to deny Shrirams statements earlier.

 

Both symbolisms appear perfectly applicable to me.

 

Thanks and Regards.

KR.

 

shrI mAtre namaH

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear kumar,

 

Namaste.

 

My earlier post was just a proverb. I am afraid if it is understood in

literal sense. By the way, barking dog seldom bites. I am not hurt.

 

Thanking you,

with regards,

Sriram

 

Kumar Ramachandran <kramach wrote:

shri gurubhyo namaH

shri mAtre namaH

 

Friends:

 

We do read everyone's posts with keen interest, don't we ? So, perhaps my bark

is worse than my bite, Shri Shriram ?

 

Thanks and regards.

KR.

 

shri mAtre namaH

 

 

[Guest guest]

shrI gurubhyo namaH

shrI mahAgaNapataye namaH

 

Dear Shri Shriram:

 

People ( especially us Indians ) dont quote proverbs without context. So, I dont

believe that your statement was " just a proverb " . However, since you say so, I

will give you the benefit of the doubt.

 

If, on the other hand, you did have some context in mind, then you should

explore what caused you to make such a statement. I believe that some people

have such pride in their public display of knowledge that they don't like to be

corrected . So, they tend to have momentary lapses of equanimity. I am not sure

if this applies in your case.

 

You must decide for yourself and act accordingly.

 

Thanks and Regards.

shrI mAtre namaH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear kumar,

 

I do not want to reply to yours keeping in view of terms and

conditions of the forum of not mudslinging on each other and also for

the fear of rupture of our cordial relationship.

 

But yes, I have learnt the lesson that knowledge should not be shared

with everyone or else these are the comments that would come up

like " headstrong " , " arrogance " and all sorts of blah blah…

 

By the way, you are somewhat correct in guessing. Yes! I take pride

in claiming myself the grandson of Smt. Vajreshwari (who herself was

the tara and tripurasundari upasaki) and the great-grandson of

Vashishta Ganapati Muni. And fortunately we are not heir of the

estates, bank balances, Toyotas etc. The legacy which is left behind

by the Vashishta Ganapati Muni is just a small piece of Sriyantra and

some of the Rg Veda Bhashyas for us.

 

AND WE TAKE PRIDE IN HEIRING THOSE.

 

Beyond this, I just do not want to entertain your posts. But still

we would maintain our cordial relationship.

 

With warm regards,

Sriram

 

Indro viswasya rajate……

 

 

, " Kumar Ramachandran " <kramach

wrote:

>

> shrI gurubhyo namaH

> shrI mahAgaNapataye namaH

>

> Dear Shri Shriram:

>

> People ( especially us Indians ) dont quote proverbs without

context. So, I dont believe that your statement was " just a proverb " .

However, since you say so, I will give you the benefit of the doubt.

>

> If, on the other hand, you did have some context in mind, then you

should explore what caused you to make such a statement. I believe

that some people have such pride in their public display of knowledge

that they don't like to be corrected . So, they tend to have

momentary lapses of equanimity. I am not sure if this applies in your

case.

>

> You must decide for yourself and act accordingly.

>

> Thanks and Regards.

> shrI mAtre namaH

>

 

[Guest guest]

shrI gurubhyo namaH

shrI mahAgaNapataye namaH

 

Dear Shri Shriram:

 

I bow to your heritage. It is a grand one. I am sure all of that heritage will

get you the moksham you seek.

 

Just remember, though that sometimes humility is the order of the day.

All of the Rishis in Ramayana, for all of their knowledge, did not get moksham.

When they were re-born as Gopikas in the Raasa Kreeda, Shri Krishna gave them

the Purnamadah upadesham

 

It also know that Kabir, who did not have that good a heritage, said.

" Pothi padh padh jag mua, pandit bhayaa no koi.

Dhai aakhar jo prem ki, padhe so pandit hoi "

-

" In all of this world, no one became a Pandit by reading books.

The ones who have read the two and a half aksharas of the word " prem " have

indeed become pandits " .

 

Just one more comment. I did not sling mud. I only stated facts.

But, only you know why you accused me of being sarcastic, and called me a dog on

this open forum.

 

However, yes, I agree this matter is closed, and I have no further issues to

talk about.

 

Thanks and Regards.

shrI mAtre namaH

 

KR.

 

-

sriram

Thursday, August 14, 2008 2:05 AM

Re: The Vastu Yantra in Srisukta

 

 

Dear kumar,

 

I do not want to reply to yours keeping in view of terms and

conditions of the forum of not mudslinging on each other and also for

the fear of rupture of our cordial relationship.

 

But yes, I have learnt the lesson that knowledge should not be shared

with everyone or else these are the comments that would come up

like " headstrong " , " arrogance " and all sorts of blah blah.

 

By the way, you are somewhat correct in guessing. Yes! I take pride

in claiming myself the grandson of Smt. Vajreshwari (who herself was

the tara and tripurasundari upasaki) and the great-grandson of

Vashishta Ganapati Muni. And fortunately we are not heir of the

estates, bank balances, Toyotas etc. The legacy which is left behind

by the Vashishta Ganapati Muni is just a small piece of Sriyantra and

some of the Rg Veda Bhashyas for us.

 

AND WE TAKE PRIDE IN HEIRING THOSE.

 

Beyond this, I just do not want to entertain your posts. But still

we would maintain our cordial relationship.

 

With warm regards,

Sriram

 

Indro viswasya rajate..

 

, " Kumar Ramachandran " <kramach

wrote:

>

> shrI gurubhyo namaH

> shrI mahAgaNapataye namaH

>

> Dear Shri Shriram:

>

> People ( especially us Indians ) dont quote proverbs without

context. So, I dont believe that your statement was " just a proverb " .

However, since you say so, I will give you the benefit of the doubt.

>

> If, on the other hand, you did have some context in mind, then you

should explore what caused you to make such a statement. I believe

that some people have such pride in their public display of knowledge

that they don't like to be corrected . So, they tend to have

momentary lapses of equanimity. I am not sure if this applies in your

case.

>

> You must decide for yourself and act accordingly.

>

> Thanks and Regards.

> shrI mAtre namaH

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>