Guest guest Posted August 19, 2005 Report Share Posted August 19, 2005 Dear Members, I find this word " self-righteous " to be misleading. Many people think it means a good thing. But in English language it has a bad connotation. It means this according to New English Oxford Dictionary self-righteous adj : excessively or hypocritically pious; " a sickening sanctimonious smile " [syn: holier-than-thou, pietistic, pietistical, pharisaic, pharisaical, sanctimonious] I particularly like the words " a sickening sanctimonious smile " ...This is what describes the " pious " people who wear all sorts of dresses and do all sorts of things in the name of spirituality.They just raise their eyebrows when someone is doing something creatively as if they know everything There is a basic need in man to egotise at the slightest opportunity. If you watch people in a community worship each one tries to outdo the other in his show of worship. But it is just what it is...just a show. That is why Jesus adviced his disciples to lock themselves in a room and pray to God almighty in Solitaire. The same principle goes with Srividya puja and it's upasana. And it is not good on the part of some upasakas to intellectualise Devi worship solely for the aggrandisement of their egoes. They try to ferret out unknown meanings into seemingly simple things to bamboozle people about Devi. They act highly pious and as if they are highly oriented toward Devi. Such people consider Devi to be a lunkhead,nescient of these charlatans' attitudes and inner thoughts. In the name of rituals and worship modologies these people beguile people into their web. They might not do it for money ,infact money is not needed for many in these days of growing affluence. What is needed is a satiation of their weak egos. Ego cannot be totally annihilated. If it is done so the body will drop dead. As long as there is body,as long as there is a form there will be ego of the minutest kind. This is shown in the matrukabheda Nirupanam also. I abominate the use of shastras and sanskrit to prove myself. I do not need such crutches to voice my views here or in any platform. What comes in the heart comes in the pen,they say. But still, this text gives a pertinent forceful statement which tells that Ego cannot be totally displaced. Some people experience nirvikalpa samdhi and maybe then the ego vanishes. Even then there exists a form in the turiya and Atituriya states of existence and so there will be a subtle ego. Ego is onething but arrogance is something to be loathed eternally. Arrogance is what flows from a self-righteous person who in the name of divinty cares aught for humanity. When the real nature of Brahman is to permeate every strata and cell of existence be it human or super human or supra human. Kulakundalini is closesly connected with Kaula margis. Here the immanent Goddess above the sahsradala padma forces them to create a personality of their own after they have reached the nirvikalpa niraakara state and force them to the lower three chakras. This too is echoed in other tantric texts which I had the pleasure to read in Connemera Library,Chennai.But more than reading I had experienced certain things fueled by a burning desire to reval my inner persona to myself. Revelling in an attitude of a Mahayogi despite professing a mortal sheath.I burnt my fingers(read nerves) badly doing certain things and suffering unbearable agony but in the process learnt many things. Every failure has a an equivalent seed of success sown. This seed sprouted and has known no turning back since then under the tutelage of my Divine mentor. In this context I would like to quote Chanukaya neeti here.This comes in Chapter 16 of the text. kautilya says Pustakeshu cha yaa vidyaa parahastheshu yaddhanam Utpanneshu cha kaaryeshu na saa vidyaa na tatdhanam! The knowledge which is in the tomes and the money which is in the hands of others is of no use. In the hour of need such knowledge and money doesn't help. The real knowledge is one which has been transeferred from the mind of the Guru to the mind of the disciple. This is the true paravidya which srividya saramsakosha talks about. In my " nirvanic-days " (The term i use during my days of dalliance with the oriental religions like Budhhism,Shintoism,Zen buddhism and confusianism,not to mention my eternal favourite Taoism) I used to love reading stories of Buddha than the dhammapada. The dhammapad (the very word is a corrupted version of Dharmapada) is highly corrupt and edited version of the origin al teachings of the Buddha so I did not hed much to it though I read that occasionaly. I was more interested in the man than the message. The man is always important than the message when it comes to spirituality. BECAUSE WORDS FAIL AFTER SOME TIME.They simply wont do.The need is great and the calling for at-oneness is greater.Love too fails after a certain time. In those spaces...one just absorbs and stays put. That is all there neds to be done. Once Buddha was asked to give a sermon on the transmission of knoweldge. He was presented Two Golden yellow flowers by one merchant who had eagerly come to listen to the then famous lectures of Buddha. Buddha smiled and took the flower and went up the raised platform below a Swarita Tree and showed the golden yellow flower to all and smiled. Not one in the corwd understood. Only ananda understood and he smiled back. The rest sat there dumbfounded at the imbecilic lecture of Buddha. The merchant later went and asked Ananda why he smiled and what he understood. Ananda replied back, " Buddha,My dear Master! Could not explain how a knoweldge transfer can happen from a master's mind to the disciple's mind. It can happen only in silence.The flower which blloms just spreads its fragrance even if it is crushed under the shoes of an obtuse passerby. Tne guru emnates the fragrance of knowledge thus.There is a mind to mind transmission where silence is the only language. All these words which I say now was eloquently said by the great Sakhymuni! What more can I say when even tears fail me at the compassion and knowledge of my great master " In Buddhism the stage before pari nirvana(maha parinirvana was not revealed by buddha to any of his disciples so buddhism remains deficient there) is called the 'descent of the great silence'. Now, The words of Ananda is not some mushy or poetic talk about the nature of a master but the real fact of a transmission modology adopted by Gurus of ancient lore. They just transmitted a particular type of silence to his/her disciple. This silence has a sound. And this is what srividya upasana is all about ...to receive this 'nada' from a 'guru spanda karika'.I cannot reval anything further here as it cannot be revealed and it has to be experienced. Things experiential when revealed in words makes me gulity of Raising my eyebrows Instead of showing two golden flowers to you! Yours yogically, Shreeram Balijepalli Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.