[Rajarajeshwari_Kalpataru] shreeram jee

[Guest guest]

shreeram jee,pranam.Please help me out.I had send a

snail mail to pujya Guru jee,i dont know wheather he

has received it or not?I am UnInitiated,falling in the

Dharmic Pursuits.I am trying to pray rightly or

wrongly as per my capacity.Thanks Gobinder s chopra.

 

--- para_anuloma <para_anuloma wrote:

 

> Dear Kannanji,

>

> I was quoting from the Vedic mantra for marriage...

>

> Dharme cha, Kame cha, Mokshe cha.... Naati charaami.

>

> But I did not use the last two words as the meaning

> will go awry.

> The vedic mantra meant that

>

> Both the twin flames(husband and wife) will lead a

> Dharmic life not

> exceeding the dictums of Rita

>

> In Kama both will be with fidelity and true to each

> other even

> mentally(Mental celibacy is what is sought, else it

> is like a mad

> dog tied to a rope, the mind keeps doing funny

> things, hence the

> control mentally too).

>

> Mokshe cha...means that both the husband and wife

> together attain

> moksha and that one does not preceed the other nor

> does one conflict

> the other in belief or faith. In other words a

> perfect congruity is

> sought after which is possible only with a twinflame

> and which is

> alomost possible with a highly elevated soul mate

> relationship.

>

> The context in which I quoted was shaktha

>

> By my dharma---Iam a shaktha(Infact in Shastras it

> is said that

> every Brahmin who does Trikala sandhya is a Tantrik

> because he is

> involved in doing the Gayathri mantra completely and

> hence a

> proponent of the Gayathri Maha Tantra). Shaktha is

> my dharma for my

> soul, my way, my beacon of light, I might falter at

> times in

> darkness but the torch of shaktha shows me the way

> out.

>

> Aham Shakthosmi!

>

> By Kama...I lust only the virtues of a true Shaktha

> in being at-one

> with Devi.I lust not Her body for that too is

> ephemeral in the

> context of Atheetha Pralaya(even though She is

> called Pashyanthi at

> the time of Mahapralaya). Also, I pray to Her to not

> give me lust

> and thus exceed my vow of a Vedic marriage even

> mentally. Whenever I

> exceed that a bit even(by say seeing a poster of a

> film actress

> somewhere, I see that within a day or two Iam

> severely punished in

> the dream by Devi).Thus I should not exceed my Kama

> Vancha.

>

> Also, Kama can be described as 'Want' as opposed to

> 'Need'. Keep the

> wants low and fulfilling the needs is what Kama is

> all about.

>

> Aham Shuddhosmi!

>

> By Moksha...I mean that I seek the Yoni of Devi

> alone for my

> paramamoksha....Parama Moksha Karunike' Mahayoni

> nilaya!Her path,

> Her Tantra, Her mantra, Her Adept, Her temple, Her

> precept, Her Vaak

> and Her Anaavaak, Her Vaani and Her Chintamani Griha

> alone form the

> limitless limit to my spiritual path. In this

> 'limitless limit' I

> remain satisfied and in a state of 'Mahasanthustha'

> and 'Mahoujasa

> Tantreeka Yoga'.

>

> Aham Anandosmi!

>

> Iam surprised you are analysing every word and

> sentence Iam typing

> with great attention. I really do not care that much

> when I type,

> Whatever comes to my heart I type with no stock in

> my memory!

>

>

> The Moving finger writes;and,having writ,

> Moves on:nor all thy Piety nor Wit

> Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,

> Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.

>

> My finger makes no question of Ayes and Noes,

> But Right or Left as strikes it goes;

> And She that toss'd Thee down into the paper,

> She knows about it all -She knows-She Knows!

>

> Aham Subodhosmi! Aham Subodhosmi!!

>

> Shreeram Balijepalli

>

>

>

> Rajarajeshwari_Kalpataru ,

> " kankan_73 "

> <kankan_73> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Shreeramji,

> >

> > In one of your mails you said.

> >

> > 'Dharma cha, Kame cha...Mokshe cha! which makes

> Shaktha impressive.

> >

> > Would you kindly explain this.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Kannan

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>