shreeram jee

[Guest guest]

Priya Gobinderji,

 

Pranams.

 

I have no connection with the management of the temple nor do I

handle the mails of the temple. Iam just an ordinary person who is a

disciple of Guru Rajagaopalar and am doing this group under His

guidance and with his grace.

 

The snail mail might have reached him. Please be assured that he

will do the needful. But I would urge you to met Him and air your

issues with Him directly.This is a proper course. He has sincere

disciples even in South America so distance should not be a problem.

 

If you really want to see Him. Place the photo of Amba

Rajarajeshwari and Rajagaopala Swami(both in our photo's section)

and pray your heart out to both sincerely and with persistent faith.

It should not be a one-day affair.

 

If your soul-need is such...then the way will be presented before

you miraculously and you will somehow come and see Him.

 

Please do not worry. If your need is not great or urgent. Then time

will tell the best answer.

 

Do not bother about initiaions as such. Even a simple chant when

done faithfully will lead you to the source.So till you get

initiated please pray Rajarajeshwari Amba, who is your 'real mother'

with all your might and mind.This is the most intoxicating thing in

the world!

 

Subodha pyaala prem ka antar liya laggay

Rom rom me rami rahe, aur amal kya khaay?

 

A cup of love, taken within that I have

Seeped into every follicle, what more intoxicating can I have?

 

Jaisay til mein tel hai, jyon chakmak mein aag,

Tera saayin tujh mein hai, tu jaag sakay to jaag.

 

Like there is oil in linseed, the fire in the flint stone.

Your god is in within you, acknowledge the unkown.

 

Dukh mein simran sab karen, sukh mein karay na koye

Jo sukh mein simran karay, to dukh kahay ko hoye.

 

All pray in woe, never once in joy.

To those who pray in joy, is there unhappiness to annoy?

 

So long my dear Sahodar,

 

Shreeram Balijepalli

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rajarajeshwari_Kalpataru , Manjit Chopra

<manjitc> wrote:

>

> shreeram jee,pranam.Please help me out.I had send a

> snail mail to pujya Guru jee,i dont know wheather he

> has received it or not?I am UnInitiated,falling in the

> Dharmic Pursuits.I am trying to pray rightly or

> wrongly as per my capacity.Thanks Gobinder s chopra.

>

> --- para_anuloma <para_anuloma> wrote:

>

> > Dear Kannanji,

> >

> > I was quoting from the Vedic mantra for marriage...

> >

> > Dharme cha, Kame cha, Mokshe cha.... Naati charaami.

> >

> > But I did not use the last two words as the meaning

> > will go awry.

> > The vedic mantra meant that

> >

> > Both the twin flames(husband and wife) will lead a

> > Dharmic life not

> > exceeding the dictums of Rita

> >

> > In Kama both will be with fidelity and true to each

> > other even

> > mentally(Mental celibacy is what is sought, else it

> > is like a mad

> > dog tied to a rope, the mind keeps doing funny

> > things, hence the

> > control mentally too).

> >

> > Mokshe cha...means that both the husband and wife

> > together attain

> > moksha and that one does not preceed the other nor

> > does one conflict

> > the other in belief or faith. In other words a

> > perfect congruity is

> > sought after which is possible only with a twinflame

> > and which is

> > alomost possible with a highly elevated soul mate

> > relationship.

> >

> > The context in which I quoted was shaktha

> >

> > By my dharma---Iam a shaktha(Infact in Shastras it

> > is said that

> > every Brahmin who does Trikala sandhya is a Tantrik

> > because he is

> > involved in doing the Gayathri mantra completely and

> > hence a

> > proponent of the Gayathri Maha Tantra). Shaktha is

> > my dharma for my

> > soul, my way, my beacon of light, I might falter at

> > times in

> > darkness but the torch of shaktha shows me the way

> > out.

> >

> > Aham Shakthosmi!

> >

> > By Kama...I lust only the virtues of a true Shaktha

> > in being at-one

> > with Devi.I lust not Her body for that too is

> > ephemeral in the

> > context of Atheetha Pralaya(even though She is

> > called Pashyanthi at

> > the time of Mahapralaya). Also, I pray to Her to not

> > give me lust

> > and thus exceed my vow of a Vedic marriage even

> > mentally. Whenever I

> > exceed that a bit even(by say seeing a poster of a

> > film actress

> > somewhere, I see that within a day or two Iam

> > severely punished in

> > the dream by Devi).Thus I should not exceed my Kama

> > Vancha.

> >

> > Also, Kama can be described as 'Want' as opposed to

> > 'Need'. Keep the

> > wants low and fulfilling the needs is what Kama is

> > all about.

> >

> > Aham Shuddhosmi!

> >

> > By Moksha...I mean that I seek the Yoni of Devi

> > alone for my

> > paramamoksha....Parama Moksha Karunike' Mahayoni

> > nilaya!Her path,

> > Her Tantra, Her mantra, Her Adept, Her temple, Her

> > precept, Her Vaak

> > and Her Anaavaak, Her Vaani and Her Chintamani Griha

> > alone form the

> > limitless limit to my spiritual path. In this

> > 'limitless limit' I

> > remain satisfied and in a state of 'Mahasanthustha'

> > and 'Mahoujasa

> > Tantreeka Yoga'.

> >

> > Aham Anandosmi!

> >

> > Iam surprised you are analysing every word and

> > sentence Iam typing

> > with great attention. I really do not care that much

> > when I type,

> > Whatever comes to my heart I type with no stock in

> > my memory!

> >

> >

> > The Moving finger writes;and,having writ,

> > Moves on:nor all thy Piety nor Wit

> > Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line,

> > Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it.

> >

> > My finger makes no question of Ayes and Noes,

> > But Right or Left as strikes it goes;

> > And She that toss'd Thee down into the paper,

> > She knows about it all -She knows-She Knows!

> >

> > Aham Subodhosmi! Aham Subodhosmi!!

> >

> > Shreeram Balijepalli

> >

> >

> >

> > Rajarajeshwari_Kalpataru ,

> > " kankan_73 "

> > <kankan_73> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Shreeramji,

> > >

> > > In one of your mails you said.

> > >

> > > 'Dharma cha, Kame cha...Mokshe cha! which makes

> > Shaktha impressive.

> > >

> > > Would you kindly explain this.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Kannan

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>