Guest guest Posted September 18, 2007 Report Share Posted September 18, 2007 [Moderator's Note: Subject line edited to remove an off-color Tamil word] What is initiation? Can man give true initiation? Only god can give full initiation. Man can only pretend to give initiation. God is seated inside all. It is like the sun. Anyone who want sincerely can get this grace. This grace is the initiation. It is called 'dikshai'. We can share the path with someone. Does it make us become God? No, we are human only. Is being human lesser than being divine? Truly the conscience in oneself is the path to Iraivan (god). It is that which makes us slight and hurt others. But when ourself are hurt with the same medicine, retaliate thereof. Without the burning of anavam (selfish ego), can one get this dikshai? Dikshai (diksha) means 'dakshinatil samirpanam'. It means one to enter the moolam in the south (dak or terk) and reaching Sindhu (top of head or uttara) through OM (kundalini). It is for this reason also Kali is known as Dakshina or Uttara Kali. South is symbolized as down, north as upwards by the knowers. As such when receiving in priestly fees, they call this 'dakshina' also. It is to show the hand which receives to be lower than that which gives. It shows the spirit of humility. Diksha by Iraivan is known as Arul. Diksha by humans or others is partial only. It is a push on the path. However so it can be quite subjective. Only oneself can be the judge if one has benefitted. Can others do it for us? What I have said is the truth only. It is for this reason alone that none have got mukthi even after dikshai by human hands. But it is a push. If all could get mukthi with a touch of the hand, then what is the point of following the path anymore? What is the point of doing dhyanam, sadhana, practice bhakti etc? However so the little push also can go a long way. As such it should not be belittled. The problem is whether the hand which gives is the true hand? How do we judge? Is it by seeing the following of the person, the ranks, etc? No, it is by judging the actions only. If I say an object is very hot - almost boiling, how are we going to know this fact? Is it by saying that this object has the word 'hot' written in it, therefore it is hot? Or that this object is red in color, therefore it is hot? Is this the way? Only if I touch it, take its temperature or pour ice on it I will know. Likewise also how can I know if the guru is genuine? Is it because he has a big following? Is it because he has a beard, wears tilak and acts holy? Or is it because the guru says so? Please think on this. The dikshai by humans are known as Perul. Those by beings who have once walked the earth is Marul. These words are just symbolizations. It is pointing towards the category. But it is the mind which determines the thing. When we are asleep and the mind has subsided in the moolam where one enters layam (unaware), can anything be learnt? Can we know the teacher, the enemy etc? Nothing can be known. We are as good as dead. The quest in the path is to realize ourselves as what we are truly. That means we get the knowledge of being the atma alone. We are atma only. This we can experience by only entering into OM. It is here where the Mayai moves. It is where Vidyai dawns. We are tied with this jadam (material atoms)by the decree of Iraivan. None can choose to be born as man, woman, this or that. It is the work of something they call god. Different people have called it with different names. Jadam behaves deterministically. It is only the atma which wills. Only Iraivan contains all. As such it knows everything spontaneously. Whereas we have to use the buddhi to think about something. If someone who attains jnanam knows everything then most saints would have known things like Einstein or Newton. We have seen tsunamis and hurricanes. Many die in this. Some say it is their karma. But man by use of buddhi, studying nature and improving logistics, better warning system, will come to a better understanding of these disasters and thereby save more people in the future. As such man can reduce the suffering of others by the use of his buddhi, following the conscience and hanving compassion. Like this also man can know the Iraivan. It is for this reason that the siddhars have made idols of Iraivan in human form. To become realized, everyone starts from ignorance only. The way to it is three fold. It is sadhanai (sadhana), mananam (reflection of one's actions and deeds) and following one's manasatchi (conscience). This is the trident Kali holds. Everyone who is born as human deserves to be born as human. But as human we can know the Iraivan, but we cannot become like the Iraivan. The true guru teaches independence to the students, It doesn't teach dependence to the guru, Love has meaning when there is independence, Relying on a thing which has strength independently,we could hold on to it. Relying on the dependent thing, we ourselves will fall when it falls. The way of Shakti is the strength. Shakti means power. Have Shakti to face the truth, to follow the conscience and to follow one's convictions. Rather than this have Shakti to hold on to one's principles, even if it wrong. Then Kala (time) itself will give us the deserving lesson and we can go beyond time (Kali). The end Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2007 Report Share Posted September 18, 2007 I object to the word - God - as it seems like something with some form which people can explicitly state they know and can describe, now if that were true then people would agree on something but the simple fact is that god is either everything or nothing, and in either case there is nothing outside of that range, so people need to simmer down and feel it more and spread out their spaciousness to encompass others, or else their god is really just a hinderance. If we recognized god as it were we would not speak of initiations at all. Since there is nothing but. - " sashimha " <sashimha Tuesday, September 18, 2007 5:15 AM Re: What is this ........ initiation? > [Moderator's Note: Subject line edited to remove an off-color Tamil word] > > What is initiation? Can man give true initiation? Only god can give > full initiation. Man can only pretend to give initiation. > > God is seated inside all. It is like the sun. Anyone who want > sincerely can get this grace. This grace is the initiation. It is > called 'dikshai'. > > We can share the path with someone. Does it make us become God? No, > we are human only. > > Is being human lesser than being divine? Truly the conscience in > oneself is the path to Iraivan (god). It is that which makes us > slight and hurt others. But when ourself are hurt with the same > medicine, retaliate thereof. Without the burning of anavam (selfish > ego), can one get this dikshai? > > Dikshai (diksha) means 'dakshinatil samirpanam'. It means one to > enter the moolam in the south (dak or terk) and reaching Sindhu (top > of head or uttara) through OM (kundalini). It is for this reason also > Kali is known as Dakshina or Uttara Kali. > > South is symbolized as down, north as upwards by the knowers. As such > when receiving in priestly fees, they call this 'dakshina' also. It > is to show the hand which receives to be lower than that which gives. > It shows the spirit of humility. > > Diksha by Iraivan is known as Arul. Diksha by humans or others is > partial only. It is a push on the path. However so it can be quite > subjective. Only oneself can be the judge if one has benefitted. Can > others do it for us? > > What I have said is the truth only. It is for this reason alone that > none have got mukthi even after dikshai by human hands. But it is a > push. If all could get mukthi with a touch of the hand, then what is > the point of following the path anymore? What is the point of doing > dhyanam, sadhana, practice bhakti etc? > > However so the little push also can go a long way. As such it should > not be belittled. > > The problem is whether the hand which gives is the true hand? > > How do we judge? Is it by seeing the following of the person, the > ranks, etc? No, it is by judging the actions only. > > If I say an object is very hot - almost boiling, how are we going to > know this fact? Is it by saying that this object has the word 'hot' > written in it, therefore it is hot? Or that this object is red in > color, therefore it is hot? Is this the way? Only if I touch it, take > its temperature or pour ice on it I will know. > > Likewise also how can I know if the guru is genuine? Is it because he > has a big following? Is it because he has a beard, wears tilak and > acts holy? Or is it because the guru says so? Please think on this. > > The dikshai by humans are known as Perul. Those by beings who have > once walked the earth is Marul. These words are just symbolizations. > It is pointing towards the category. > > But it is the mind which determines the thing. When we are asleep and > the mind has subsided in the moolam where one enters layam (unaware), > can anything be learnt? Can we know the teacher, the enemy etc? > Nothing can be known. We are as good as dead. > > The quest in the path is to realize ourselves as what we are truly. > That means we get the knowledge of being the atma alone. We are atma > only. This we can experience by only entering into OM. It is here > where the Mayai moves. It is where Vidyai dawns. > > We are tied with this jadam (material atoms)by the decree of Iraivan. > None can choose to be born as man, woman, this or that. It is the > work of something they call god. Different people have called it with > different names. Jadam behaves deterministically. It is only the atma > which wills. Only Iraivan contains all. As such it knows everything > spontaneously. Whereas we have to use the buddhi to think about > something. If someone who attains jnanam knows everything then most > saints would have known things like Einstein or Newton. > > We have seen tsunamis and hurricanes. Many die in this. Some say it > is their karma. But man by use of buddhi, studying nature and > improving logistics, better warning system, will come to a better > understanding of these disasters and thereby save more people in the > future. As such man can reduce the suffering of others by the use of > his buddhi, following the conscience and hanving compassion. > > Like this also man can know the Iraivan. It is for this reason that > the siddhars have made idols of Iraivan in human form. > > To become realized, everyone starts from ignorance only. The way to > it is three fold. It is sadhanai (sadhana), mananam (reflection of > one's actions and deeds) and following one's manasatchi (conscience). > This is the trident Kali holds. Everyone who is born as human > deserves to be born as human. But as human we can know the Iraivan, > but we cannot become like the Iraivan. > > The true guru teaches independence to the students, > It doesn't teach dependence to the guru, > Love has meaning when there is independence, > Relying on a thing which has strength independently,we could hold on > to it. > Relying on the dependent thing, we ourselves will fall when it falls. > > The way of Shakti is the strength. Shakti means power. Have Shakti to > face the truth, to follow the conscience and to follow one's > convictions. Rather than this have Shakti to hold on to one's > principles, even if it wrong. Then Kala (time) itself will give us > the deserving lesson and we can go beyond time (Kali). > > > The end > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.