Guest guest Posted November 5, 2009 Report Share Posted November 5, 2009 Dear Mr. Abhijith With all due respect I wish to note that there are quite a few potholes in your theory of dividing India according to the vedas. Even if we agree on the areas you mentioned having dominance in the Vedas, the remaining places had importance for kaula & tantric system as you are well aware(including yours). So my point is that in those places also women had definitely very very important status as we all know. I wonder how you got this idea in your mind that non vedic places (which Iam not very sure of..! the historians have long back discarded this.) had no importance for women..!! from which book and which place?? The slokas you mentioned in the Rig also agreed, but the above point pls clarify to close this issue. pranam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.