Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Free Will

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

" Free Will " is very broad. What specifically is your question?

 

, rohri mani <rohri_mani wrote:

>

>

>

> Can somebody enlighten me on “Free will�

>

> Regards

> Sanjeev

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rohri mani wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Can somebody enlighten me on “Free will�

>

> Regards

> Sanjeev

>

 

--------------

 

Free will is the notion that you exist as a separated individuated

entity possessing the power of independent volition, through which you

believe that it is you who

thought the thought that has appeared, it is you who chose the decision

that got to be chosen, it is you who acted the action which unfolded as

the moment.

 

Ergo, the other side of the coin of free will is the notion that you are

responsible for whatever is happening to you, as a consequence of the

actions of your free will.

 

 

A fundamental notion...........out of which all other notions get to be

created.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_will

 

Free will raises the question whether, and in what sense, rational agents

exercise control over their actions, decisions, choices. Addressing this

question requires understanding the relationship between freedom and cause,

and determining whether the laws of nature are causally deterministic. The

various philosophical positions taken differ on whether all events are

determined or not — determinism versus indeterminism — and also on whether

freedom can coexist with determinism or not — compatibilism versus

incompatibilism. So, for instance, 'hard determinists' are incompatibilists

who argue that the universe is deterministic, and that this makes free will

impossible.

 

Libertarians are also incompatibilists. They believe that free will exists

and strict causal determinism is false. Their problem is to reconcile free

will with chance or indeterminism, which threatens to make actions random.

 

The principle of free will has religious, ethical, and scientific

implications. For example, in the religious realm, free will implies that an

omnipotent divinity does not assert its power over individual will and

choices. In ethics, it implies that individuals can be held morally

accountable for their actions. The question of free will has been a central

issue since the beginning of philosophical thought.

 

.....

....

...

 

 

http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/06259a.htm

 

The question of free will, moral liberty, or the liberum arbitrium of the

Schoolmen, ranks amongst the three or four most important philosophical

problems of all time. It ramifies into ethics, theology, metaphysics, and

psychology. The view adopted in response to it will determine a man's

position in regard to the most momentous issues that present themselves to

the human mind. On the one hand, does man possess genuine moral freedom,

power of real choice, true ability to determine the course of his thoughts

and volitions, to decide which motives shall prevail within his mind, to

modify and mould his own character? Or, on the other, are man's thoughts and

volitions, his character and external actions, all merely the inevitable

outcome of his circumstances? Are they all inexorably predetermined in every

detail along rigid lines by events of the past, over which he himself has

had no sort of control? This is the real import of the free-will problem.

 

 

....

...

..

 

 

http://www.rep.routledge.com/article/V014

 

'Free will' is the conventional name of a topic that is best discussed

without reference to the will. Its central questions are 'What is it to act

(or choose) freely?', and 'What is it to be morally responsible for one's

actions (or choices)?' These two questions are closely connected, for

freedom of action is necessary for moral responsibility, even if it is not

sufficient.

 

Philosophers give very different answers to these questions, hence also to

two more specific questions about ourselves: (1) Are we free agents? and (2)

Can we be morally responsible for what we do? Answers to (1) and (2) range

from 'Yes, Yes' to 'No, No' - via 'Yes, No' and various degrees of

'Perhaps', 'Possibly', and 'In a sense'. (The fourth pair of outright

answers, 'No, Yes', is rare, but appears to be accepted by some

Protestants.) Prominent among the 'Yes, Yes' sayers are the compatibilists,

who hold that free will is compatible with determinism. Briefly, determinism

is the view that everything that happens is necessitated by what has already

gone before, in such a way that nothing can happen otherwise than it does.

According to compatibilists, freedom is compatible with determinism because

freedom is essentially just a matter of not being constrained or hindered in

certain ways when one acts or chooses. Thus normal adult human beings in

normal circumstances are able to act and choose freely. No one is holding a

gun to their heads. They are not drugged, or in chains, or subject to a

psychological compulsion. They are therefore wholly free to choose and act

even if their whole physical and psychological make-up is entirely

determined by things for which they are in no way ultimately responsible -

starting with their genetic inheritance and early upbringing.

.....

....

...

 

 

 

 

http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/freewill1.html

 

Ambiguous figures, of which the Serendip logo (circa 1994-95) is one

example, make possible some interesting observations bearing on the

existence and meaning of " free will " . In most people's minds, " free will "

has two relatively distinct properties. The first is the idea that what one

does is in some sense " free " , that is " not determined by something else " .

The second is the idea that one can onself control what one does.

 

.....

....

...

 

 

 

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Gurubuster <fanatofida wrote:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting that! I really needed to read it today...

 

Two questions:

 

1) Is astrology a part of Hinduism? I always thought it grew separately from the

religion, even though many link the two.

 

2) Growing up in a Hindu household (see above question), I've been to my share

of astrologers. I love astrology, studying it, etc. but I was very turned off by

it when I was in college. I've found that Indian astrologers use horrible scare

tactics (e.g. if you don't start wearing a blue sapphire next month, you'll be

in a horrible car accident) to manipulate people. None of them, in my

experience, even begin to explore the psychological aspects of astrology. And if

you're a woman, most of these astrologers (who are almost always older men)

assume that getting married quickly is the only thing you care about. I find

that Western astrologers delve more into the psychological aspects of astrology,

and are generally more positive in their dealings. At the same time, I've found

that Western astrologers are not detailed/confident enough when giving info.

 

So, what it boils down to is this. I would love to find a good astrologer (I

live in the New York/New Jersey area), but can't seem to do so. Any

recommendations?

 

Salma

 

, " msbauju " <msbauju wrote:

>

> Here's an article from Hinduism Today:

>

>

http://www.beliefnet.com/Holistic-Living/Astrology/2002/03/Karma-Free-Will-And-D\

estiny.aspx

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...