Guest guest Posted January 13, 2004 Report Share Posted January 13, 2004 To all devotees of the Adi Shakti Shri Mataji Nirmala Devi, The Kingdom of God of the Christians is the Sahasrara Chakra of the Hindus, the 1000 Petal-Lotus of the Buddhists, the Dsam Dwar of the Sikhs, the Keter of the Jews, and the Regions in their Souls of the Muslims. It is one and the same, temporarily within all beings (microcosm) and eternally external (macrocosm). Only the Divine Feminine opens the secret path to this Divine Dimension: The Adi Shakti of the Hindus is the Holy Ghost of the Christians, the Prajnaparamita of the Buddhists, the Aykaa Mayee of the Sikhs, the Shekinah of the Jews, and the Ruh of Allah of the Muslims. She is one and the same. The Last Judgment and Resurrection (Al-Qiyamah) are central to Jewish, Christian and Islamic eschatology, and to a lesser degree related to that of Hinduism and Buddhism. The Christian Comforter promised by Lord Jesus to reveal all that He could not preach, and the arrival of the Islamic Ruh of Allah to pronounce this Golden Age of the Resurrection (Al Qiyamah) is unquestionably entrenched in parables of the Bible and Koran. Only the Hindu Adi Shakti is capable of explaining to humanity the all-embracing unity of the Santanna Dharma that will end all their irreconcilable differences and attain moksa (eternal life). The very basic of the Eternal Religion is essential for the commencement of the Last Judgment and Al-Qiyamah. Take for example just a single scriptural predicament that has plagued Christian and Islamic scholars for centuries. Muslims are waiting for graves to open up as promised: " Does man think that We cannot assemble his bones? Nay, We are able to put together in perfect order, the very tip of his fingers. " Jews, Muslims and Christians were faced with the dilemma of how God will raise the dead. They have questioned the resurrection for millennia and, without the knowledge of rebirth, have mutilated the Last Judgment and Al-Qiyamah into Doomsday, the End. " In his defense before Agrippa, Paul asked his Jewish audience: " Why is it judged incredible with you, if God doth raise the dead? " (Acts 26:8). There have always been those who found the concept of the bodily resurrection unbelievable, and their modern counterparts are appearing increasingly - even in within the framework of Christendom. " FALSE IDEAS The ancient Greeks disdained the notion that the body could ever be raised. Thus when Paul spoke concerning " the resurrection of the dead [ones - plural] " in Athens, his message was mocked (Acts 17:23). During the time of Jesus, the Sadducees denied the resurrection of the body (Mt. 22:23; Acts 23:6-8). Even some Christians in the primitive church had fallen for this error, and so affirmed: " There is no resurrection of the dead " (1 Cor. 15:12) - a heresy which Paul attempted to correct In the late decades of the apostolic age, a sect known as the Gnostics arose, denying the resurrection of the body. In our own age, atheism, of course, rejects the idea that the human body will be raised from the dead. An article in the Soviet Encyclopedia asserts that the concept of the resurrection is in " decisive contradiction with scientific natural knowledge " (quoted in Wycliffe Dictionary of Theology, Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1999, p. 455). Of course religious modernism repudiates the idea of the resurrection, since, having " demythologized " the Scriptures, it rejects any element of the miraculous. Cultish groups also have a problem with the doctrine that God will raise the body. The " Jehovah's Witnesses " assert that the incorrigibly wicked " will never be remembered for resurrection " (Make Sure of All Things, p. 314).Within the churches of Christ, those who have converted to the dogma of Max King deny the resurrection. Like Hymenaeus and Philetus, men who erred in Paul's day, these folks suggest that the " resurrection is past already " (2 Tim. 2:17,18), having been spiritually effected in A.D. 70 with the destruction of Jerusalem (see our recent Feature article, The Menace of Radical Preterism.)Whether ancient or modern, within the church or outside of it, the denial of the bodily resurrection is radical error. And in this age of biblical illiteracy, this false doctrine will continue to make its presence felt among the people of God unless gospel teachers return to a proclamation of the fundamental principles of the Christian faith, one of which is the " resurrection of the dead " (cf. Heb. 6:1,2). THE BIBLE AND THE RESURRECTION The Bible clearly affirms the doctrine of the general resurrection of the dead. Note, in brief, the following points. 1. The concept of the resurrection is found in the Old Testament - though not as pronounced as it comes to light in the New Testament (cf. 2 Tim. 1:10). According to Jesus, God's declaration to Moses regarding Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob was an indication of the eventual resurrection (Mt. 22:31,32). Other Old Testament passages also suggested that man's body would be raised ultimately (see Job 19:25-27; Psa. 17:15; Isa. 26:19; Dan. 12:2; Hos. 13:14). 2. The doctrine of the bodily resurrection is affirmed abundantly in the New Testament (see Jn. 5:28-29; 6:39-40; Mk. 12:18-27; Acts 17:23; 26:8; Rom. 8:23; 1 Thes. 4:16; 1 Cor. 15; 2 Cor. 5:1-2; Phil. 3:21).How any person can read Paul's great discussion of the eventual disposition of the dead - in 1 Corinthians, Chapter 15 - and not believe in the resurrection, has to be one of the mysteries of the ages. In that remarkable chapter the apostle develops his line of argumentation in the following fashion. a. Paul persuasively pled for the historical fact of the bodily resurrection of Jesus Christ on the basis of numerous eyewitnesses of the risen Lord. On one occasion, this consisted of more than 500 people (15:1-11). b. The apostle maintained that the Lord's resurrection is Heaven's guarantee that we too shall be raised. Jesus is the " first-fruits " (a figure suggesting a future harvest) of the general resurrection to be effected at the time of His return (vss. 12-34). c. Paul discussed the nature of the resurrected body. It will not be a physical or a corruptible body; rather, it will be spiritual and incorruptible (vss. 35-49). Nevertheless, there will be an identity continuum between our present body and the new, resurrected one. Only in this light can the term " resurrection " (which means to " stand up " ) have any relevance. Moreover, each body will have its own individuality (vs. 38). It is so thrilling to reflect upon the fact that our new body will be identical in form to the glorious body of our resurrected Lord (see Phil. 3:21). d. Finally, the theological impact of the resurrection is set forth. It is a declaration of victory (vss. 50-57). In view of this great hope, saints are admonished to persevere in their fidelity (vs. 58).The biblical doctrine of the resurrection of the dead is a comforting concept. Those who would rob us of this hope are not friends of the cause of Christ. " Unbelievable as it may sound this simple case of rebirth. That is why Shri Mataji tells us not to believe the fire and brimstone end of the world that ignorant religious institutions have preached for centuries: Though you can understand that Mother's Love makes it very easy for you to get to your Realization and that the whole story of Last Judgment — which looks such a horrifying experience — has been made very beautiful, and very tender, and delicate, and does not disturb you. " (Bombay, India — September 28, 1979) For more than 2000 years Christians and Muslims have indoctrinated their followers with the doomsday scenario because they did not have knowledge of rebirth, among other enlightenment. The Last Judgment and Al-Qiyamah is based on ignorance and falsehood, and Shri Mataji is concerned that many may miss what the Koran proclaims is the Great News for humanity. Only the Sanatana Dharma can unravel scriptural mysteries of the Bible and Koran, and is central to the success of the Last Judgment and Al-Qiyamah. This is the Eternal Religion! Hindus themselves hold the view that this spiritual tradition, known in the ancient, sacred language of Sanskrit as " Sanatana Dharma, " is an eternal and ever- present way of life. Moreover, it is a way of life and world-view that is trans-geographical: traces of Sanatana Dharma are to be found in many of the ancient cultures of the world. No one actually knows when Sanatana Dharma was first started. Both practitioners of Hinduism, as well as all academic scholars of Hinduism, agree that there was no one specific time in known history when the religion was founded. Additionally, there was no one individual - a prophet, saint or priest - who can be claimed as the founder of the religion. As far as Hindus themselves are concerned, Sanatana Dharma was never actually founded. It is an eternal spiritual culture that is as old as the Earth herself. Moreover, it is the sustainer of the Earth. This is indicated by the meanings of the two words that constitute the very name of this culture: sanatana means " eternal " and dharma means " natural law. " It is time for Hindus, Buddhists and Sikhs with vision and insight to rise to the Call of the Adi Shakti and declare Her Message of the Last Judgment and Resurrection. The Sanatana Dharma must be upheld. Jai Shri Mataji! jagbir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.