[shriadishakti] Criticism - nothing new - Take it easy !!!

[Guest guest]

>Thank you Rajan. Your comment is excellent...>

>Sahaja Yoga centers are establishing whole world

spontanously and people who infact nothing know about

Sahaja Yoga but help us with willingly...

>They said, your knowledge is very useful whole people

and you are nice people

>AND VERY ÝMPORTANT THÝNK ÝS ÝN SAHAJA YOGA ÝT ÝS MY

VERY DECÝSÝVE OBSERVATÝON ÝS THAT ADHARMÝC PEOPLE

NEVER CAN STAY ÝN SAHAJA YOGA COLLECTÝVÝTE.ANYWAY THEY

ARE RUN AWAY...

>JSM

 

C V<-- RAJAN BATRA <r_batra_2000 wrote:

> Could we have the entire letter of the Muslim

> brother

> minus the sender's email address? We would be

> satisfied too.

>

> Regarding the following:

>

> > i am absolutely convinced that Shri Mataji's

> Message

> > of the Last Judgment and Resurrection cannot be

> challenged by any religious organization or

> individual. But despite Her assurance decades ago

> > that Her Truth will triumph few SYs ever had the

> > faith or conviction to announce it to all the

> nations. Even as the world continues to witness the

> destructive path of moral decadence and religious

> conflicts we SYs twiddle our thumbs and pretend we

> are doing our duty by fearlessly proclaiming the

> subtle system. The plain truth is that we SYs just

> cannot get out of our siege mentality.

>

> > We are just happy in our local collective caves

> where chieftains convince us to remain fearful that

> the public will flee from truth. It is a catch 22

> situation that defies logic and common sense, let

> alone dharma.

> >

> The other day i had a talk with two long established

> SYs. Again this subject of the hypocritical stance

> taken by SYs was raised i.e. keeping the Last

> Judgment

> and Resurrection a secret from the public.

>

> Again the same collective answer came back: The

> public will flee.

> >

> i find this collective reason hypocritically

> repulsive and disgustingly adharmic. Maybe SYs

> should

> tell Shri Mataji not to declare the Last Judgment in

> public. It is high time we SYs start blaming Her for

> making the public flee from Sahaja Yoga for the last

>

> three decades, and take responsibility for the sad

> state of affairs, especially in North America. Maybe

> it would have been better if She had hoodwinked all

> of

> us with the subtle system, and then shocked everyone

> years later with the Last Judgment. But then isn't

> this the modus operandi of us SYs? Now i am getting

> confused.

>

> jagbir

> >

>

> Regarding the above:

>

> Well, you can't question or challenge the way She

> works. And coming from you, I find these words too

> strong. It would be almost anti SY. It is not

> advisable.

>

> The public will flee, but where will they flee if

> God

> is everywhere?

>

> We are happy in local collective, is true. We have a

> right to enjoy what She gave us, primarily because

> we

> deserve it due to our past good Karma, i don't see

> any

> sense in quibbing about something good.

>

> The reason why SY's do not announce it publicly

> except

> for people in their circle of acquaintance and

> around

> etc, is because it is Her work to do so, not yours

> and

> mine. She will do so when it is deemed fit by Her,

> not

> by you and me.

>

> I don't see any seige mentality in this, or the last

> thirty years.

>

> The Last Thirty years have been spent by Her in

> building up a foundation, a platform for other non

> Sahajayogis to jump in at the time the Last

> Judgement

> commences, because at that time it will be our duty

> to

> help and guide those who will be new.

>

> That is why SY centres are being established all

> over

> the place. Simultaneously, it gives us an

> opportunity

> to go in to the depths of truth.

>

> What you say amounts to self pity and disgust.

>

> I don't know why.

>

> Any Sahajayogi who does footsoaking and shoebeating

> twice a day should not have such bitterness and

> feelings.

>

> We do appreciate you being the owner of

> www.adishakti.org and compiling and transmitting

> large

> amounts of data, but I think a line of demarcation

> should be drawn which would help you to take on only

> that what is your responsibility and only that what

> you can handle.

>

> You are not responsible if the number of Sahajayogis

> do not increase despite our efforts.

>

> It would not be prudent to find faults in ourselves.

> That is something which we all can do without.

>

> You are going towards melancholy with this message,

> if

> it is yours, jagbir. You need to watch it.

>

> Acknowledge this email.

>

> Regards,

>

> Rajan Batra

>

>

>

> Search - Find what you’re looking for faster

> http://search.

>

>

>

>