Guest guest Posted October 18, 2004 Report Share Posted October 18, 2004 shriadishakti , " michael_sahaj " <balwinsome@h...> wrote: > > A wonderful synopsis, Jag. > > Ms Nutmeg has quite obviously flipped under the pressure of it all. > > And how completely insane she must be to try denying it > afterwards. But she's been insane for years. > > What was also very satisfying was reading Simon writing again as > his 'balwinsome' character demanding proof, just like he did > as 'daniel glasheen'. > > The proof we had was from a SYogi who simply got into his > account :-D > > He can deny it all til he is blue in the face, but we know he > is 'joel', he even writes the same as when he invented 'daniel'. > > In fact, all his pseudo characters write the same textually > as 'joel' and 'daniel' and the others. he's not very creative at > all. Many SYogis who knew him used to call him the 'buffoon who > thinks he's a scholar'. > > How true that is. > > Keep up the great work here guys. > Hi Mike, Unlike Ms. Gilmour who made an error almost as grave as Simon's narration of events leading to The Madness, he is not going to admit to any wrongdoing. He has bitterly learnt from that obviously much regretted mistake of admitting to be deluded by The Madness. His own confession that he was quite insane into thinking that he was some sort of multi-personality incarnation finally opened the eyes of those he had deceived. The web pages exposing this cunning character have been very effective into preventing new seekers from listening to him. i must again thank those who labored to set them up - they are now paying handsome dividends. Unlike the 80s and 90s, it is so easy nowadays to let others know about this false prophet. i will continue working on the evidence gathered and improve the quality and quantity of the work in progress to expose this false prophet Simon Montford Dicon. As he knows by now i make a worst enemy than a best friend. Even nastier is the fact that i have only one enemy in the world to direct all my attention and energy. He may be 'buffoon who thinks he's a scholar' but in the land of the blind the one-eyed Simon is king. He needs to invent more IDs to tell tales about Shri Mataji to keep the few remaining followers engaged. Once in a while he resurfaces as the real Simon Montford Dicon to regurgitate whatever he ate since 1985/86 to perk their interest. Those jaded 80s followers have left long ago, especially when the www.adishakti.org websites provided irrefutable evidence that Shri Mataji is indeed the Adi Shakti, and warned about the grave consequences of going against Her: http://www.adishakti.org/prophecies/prophecy_5.htm And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, It shall be forgiven him: But unto him that blasphemeth against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven. Luke 12:10 Verily I say unto you, all sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men, and blasphemies wherewith soever they shall blaspheme: But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost, hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation. Mark 3:28-29 Wherefore I say unto you, all manner of sin and blasphemy, shall be forgiven unto men: But the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men. And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, It shall be forgiven him: But whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come. Matthew 12:31-32 " The gravest of all sins is blasphemy against the Holy Ghost. One may speak even against Jesus Christ in ignorance and, upon repentance, be forgiven, but knowingly to sin against the Holy Ghost by denying its influence after having received it is unpardonable (Matt. 12:31-32; Jacob 7:19; Alma 39:6), and the consequences are inescapable. Such denial dooms the perpetrator to the hell of the second spiritual death (TPJS, p. 361). This extreme judgment comes because the person sins knowingly against the light, thereby severing himself from the redeeming grace of Christ. " www.mormons.org/ ------------- " The Greek word 'blasphemeo' GSN 987 is used in the gospel accounts of Mark and Luke. *The Greek word `blasphemia' GSN 988 is used in the gospel of Matthew. According to the definitions, the word 'blasphemy' means; to injure the work of God's Holy Spirit, by speaking evil of something Holy and pure from God and falsely accusing the work of the Holy Spirit, to be evil or Satanic. Blasphemy then is a sin or crime against God, causing injury to Him or His Spirit by false accusations. The spirit behind these types of accusations is from the accuser himself, the devil, the chief adversary of God. " M. Mary C. Becker, Literal Translation with Strong's Numbers ------------- " Every religion has its projected `end-time.' For Jews, it is the tikkun; for Gnostics, the apocatastasis; for Zoroastrians, the Fravarti; for Christians, it is the Parousia. Time was, time is, time shall be no more. The millennial spirit is running strongly at this time, only ten years before the new millennium which is alternatively viewed as the New Age of Aquarius or else as Armageddon. The return of the Holy Spirit as the Risen Christ has been long expected in Christian eschatology. However, whether the presence winging its way across our skies is to be that of doves or of missile-headed jets has been doubtful. As we approach the end of the second millennium after Christ, aficionados of both peace and destruction seem to reign supreme. As ever at such times, the mere threat of the last days has sent the faithful to the Book of the Apocalypse and everyone else to the consultation of divinatory means, including the perhaps aptly named Nostradamus, whose prophecies expire at 1999. Sophia, so familiarly imaged by the dove of peace, might seem ill at ease in this millennial scenario, yet she draws upon her aspect of Black Goddess to deliver warnings and to bring the kenosis of war and conflict to those with no peace in their hearts. " Caitlín Matthews, Sophia: Goddess of Wisdom ------------- " The Wait Is Over: Jews' Messiah Now Kosher Vatican affirms Jewish position; scholars scramble to decipher new doctrine. In 1967, during the early thaw of Catholic-Jewish relations, Rabbi Irving " Yitz " Greenberg addressed a Catholic audience about the conflicting Messiah beliefs. The Orthodox rabbi noted that one difference between Jews and Catholics is whether the Messiah is coming for the first or second time. Christians believe the Messiah — a Jew from Nazareth called Jesus — came 2,000 years ago, and after dying and being resurrected, will someday return to redeem the world. Jews say the Messiah has yet to arrive — a belief that led to centuries of Christian anti-Semitism and killings of Jews who refused to accept the Christian view. . . . " It's a very important, critical statement, " said Rabbi Jack Bemporad, head of the Center for Interreligious Understanding. " Up until now they were saying Jews are completely and absolutely wrong and we are waiting in vain and blind to the truth. " Others were more cautious, noting continued significant differences in Messiah beliefs — particularly that Christians believe that their Messiah is Jesus who is also God, while for Jews the Messiah is not a divine being and cannot be Jesus because he died before bringing the redemption. Rabbi James Rudin, senior interreligious adviser to the American Jewish Committee, raised several concerns. " Does the new book instruct Catholics to fully accept the fact there is not only theological space in God's universe for Jews/Judaism, but they must also affirm that the identity of long awaited Messiah, so ardently prayed for by Jews for centuries, is unknown and will remain unknown until the Messiah appears? " he asked. " That is a clear affirmation of Judaism with no theological strings attached, no Jesus waiting for Jews at the end of the theological day. If this is the book's message, then it is an important step forward on the part of the Catholic Church. " " Eric J. Greenberg, Debating The Messiah [www.virtualjerusalem.com/] ------------- i believe the group suffered a serious setback a few months ago but till i do not get verifiable proof to present here at the forum i will let it be. There are only a few remaining hardcore followers of Simon left, one of which is Ms. Gilmour a former patient (and maybe still is an out-patient) at the Wolston Park Mental Hospital in Brisbane, one of the largest psychiatric facilities in Australia. It is easy to mould the mentally sick into diehard followers to form the core of his cult. Thus in the land of the mentally blind the one- eyed psychopath is king. who said that!!??? jagbir sigmund freud Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 18, 2004 Report Share Posted October 18, 2004 Thanks for this Jag. Superb analysis of the sad cult sdm who are diminishing in number, about only six of them now (the satanic six perhaps?) I love the quote you summed up with; " in the land of the mentally blind the one-eyed psychopath is king. " How apt. JSM Michael Jag wrote: Hi Mike, Unlike Ms. Gilmour who made an error almost as grave as Simon's narration of events leading to The Madness, he is not going to admit to any wrongdoing. He has bitterly learnt from that obviously much regretted mistake of admitting to be deluded by The Madness. His own confession that he was quite insane into thinking that he was some sort of multi-personality incarnation finally opened the eyes of those he had deceived. The web pages exposing this cunning character have been very effective into preventing new seekers from listening to him. i must again thank those who labored to set them up - they are now paying handsome dividends. Unlike the 80s and 90s, it is so easy nowadays to let others know about this false prophet. i will continue working on the evidence gathered and improve the quality and quantity of the work in progress to expose this false prophet Simon Montford Dicon. As he knows by now i make a worst enemy than a best friend. Even nastier is the fact that i have only one enemy in the world to direct all my attention and energy. He may be 'buffoon who thinks he's a scholar' but in the land of the blind the one-eyed Simon is king. He needs to invent more IDs to tell tales about Shri Mataji to keep the few remaining followers engaged. Once in a while he resurfaces as the real Simon Montford Dicon to regurgitate whatever he ate since 1985/86 to perk their interest. Those jaded 80s followers have left long ago, especially when the www.adishakti.org websites provided irrefutable evidence that Shri Mataji is indeed the Adi Shakti, and warned about the grave consequences of going against Her: http://www.adishakti.org/prophecies/prophecy_5.htm And whosoever shall speak a word against the Son of man, It shall be forgiven him: But unto him that blasphemeth against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven. Luke 12:10 Verily I say unto you, all sins shall be forgiven unto the sons of men, and blasphemies wherewith soever they shall blaspheme: But he that shall blaspheme against the Holy Ghost, hath never forgiveness, but is in danger of eternal damnation. Mark 3:28-29 Wherefore I say unto you, all manner of sin and blasphemy, shall be forgiven unto men: But the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men. And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, It shall be forgiven him: But whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come. Matthew 12:31-32 " The gravest of all sins is blasphemy against the Holy Ghost. One may speak even against Jesus Christ in ignorance and, upon repentance, be forgiven, but knowingly to sin against the Holy Ghost by denying its influence after having received it is unpardonable (Matt. 12:31-32; Jacob 7:19; Alma 39:6), and the consequences are inescapable. Such denial dooms the perpetrator to the hell of the second spiritual death (TPJS, p. 361). This extreme judgment comes because the person sins knowingly against the light, thereby severing himself from the redeeming grace of Christ. " www.mormons.org/ ------------- " The Greek word 'blasphemeo' GSN 987 is used in the gospel accounts of Mark and Luke. *The Greek word `blasphemia' GSN 988 is used in the gospel of Matthew. According to the definitions, the word 'blasphemy' means; to injure the work of God's Holy Spirit, by speaking evil of something Holy and pure from God and falsely accusing the work of the Holy Spirit, to be evil or Satanic. Blasphemy then is a sin or crime against God, causing injury to Him or His Spirit by false accusations. The spirit behind these types of accusations is from the accuser himself, the devil, the chief adversary of God. " M. Mary C. Becker, Literal Translation with Strong's Numbers ------------- " Every religion has its projected `end-time.' For Jews, it is the tikkun; for Gnostics, the apocatastasis; for Zoroastrians, the Fravarti; for Christians, it is the Parousia. Time was, time is, time shall be no more. The millennial spirit is running strongly at this time, only ten years before the new millennium which is alternatively viewed as the New Age of Aquarius or else as Armageddon. The return of the Holy Spirit as the Risen Christ has been long expected in Christian eschatology. However, whether the presence winging its way across our skies is to be that of doves or of missile-headed jets has been doubtful. As we approach the end of the second millennium after Christ, aficionados of both peace and destruction seem to reign supreme. As ever at such times, the mere threat of the last days has sent the faithful to the Book of the Apocalypse and everyone else to the consultation of divinatory means, including the perhaps aptly named Nostradamus, whose prophecies expire at 1999. Sophia, so familiarly imaged by the dove of peace, might seem ill at ease in this millennial scenario, yet she draws upon her aspect of Black Goddess to deliver warnings and to bring the kenosis of war and conflict to those with no peace in their hearts. " Caitlín Matthews, Sophia: Goddess of Wisdom ------------- " The Wait Is Over: Jews' Messiah Now Kosher Vatican affirms Jewish position; scholars scramble to decipher new doctrine. In 1967, during the early thaw of Catholic-Jewish relations, Rabbi Irving " Yitz " Greenberg addressed a Catholic audience about the conflicting Messiah beliefs. The Orthodox rabbi noted that one difference between Jews and Catholics is whether the Messiah is coming for the first or second time. Christians believe the Messiah — a Jew from Nazareth called Jesus — came 2,000 years ago, and after dying and being resurrected, will someday return to redeem the world. Jews say the Messiah has yet to arrive — a belief that led to centuries of Christian anti-Semitism and killings of Jews who refused to accept the Christian view. . . . " It's a very important, critical statement, " said Rabbi Jack Bemporad, head of the Center for Interreligious Understanding. " Up until now they were saying Jews are completely and absolutely wrong and we are waiting in vain and blind to the truth. " Others were more cautious, noting continued significant differences in Messiah beliefs — particularly that Christians believe that their Messiah is Jesus who is also God, while for Jews the Messiah is not a divine being and cannot be Jesus because he died before bringing the redemption. Rabbi James Rudin, senior interreligious adviser to the American Jewish Committee, raised several concerns. " Does the new book instruct Catholics to fully accept the fact there is not only theological space in God's universe for Jews/Judaism, but they must also affirm that the identity of long awaited Messiah, so ardently prayed for by Jews for centuries, is unknown and will remain unknown until the Messiah appears? " he asked. " That is a clear affirmation of Judaism with no theological strings attached, no Jesus waiting for Jews at the end of the theological day. If this is the book's message, then it is an important step forward on the part of the Catholic Church. " " Eric J. Greenberg, Debating The Messiah [www.virtualjerusalem.com/] ------------- i believe the group suffered a serious setback a few months ago but till i do not get verifiable proof to present here at the forum i will let it be. There are only a few remaining hardcore followers of Simon left, one of which is Ms. Gilmour a former patient (and maybe still is an out-patient) at the Wolston Park Mental Hospital in Brisbane, one of the largest psychiatric facilities in Australia. It is easy to mould the mentally sick into diehard followers to form the core of his cult. Thus in the land of the mentally blind the one- eyed psychopath is king. who said that!!??? jagbir sigmund freud Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get secure FREE email: http://www.hushmail.com/?l=2 Free, ultra-private instant messaging with Hush Messenger http://www.hushmail.com/services-messenger?l=434 Promote security and make money with the Hushmail Affiliate Program: http://www.hushmail.com/about-affiliate?l=427 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.