Guest guest Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 shriadishakti , A L <vindhyavasinidasi> wrote: > > > > This is a forum where you can speak freely so that > > SYs are forced to look themselves in the mirror. > > If you can tell about these negative SYs who hurt > > you it would help confirm my long-held conviction that > > the negativity is within. > > I don't want to say anything bad about these people. I > am a very sensitive person and my feelings are easily > hurt. Let's just say that those Sahaja Yogis may be > right about me. I may have a big ego, conditionings, > my chakras may be all caught up, but it hurts when > these things are thrown at my face. > Thank you Dasi for your kind consideration and humility. Others would have been less forgiving. It is true that some SYs love boasting about their ability to check the chakras of others, thinking those 'caught' are negative. What galls me is these characters are themselves full of catches, requiring daily ritualistic cleansing for years. Yet these sickly SYs keep advising the healthy how to heal! Shri Mataji said that " some people achieve heights very easily, but some have to work for six or seven months and are still not all right. " What gives 'sick' SYs working on themselves for more than six months the authority to order those who have achieved heights to come down to their level? Shri Mataji has told SYs to stop checking chakras of others and take care of themselves. This is because people, especially newcomers, have been hurt by them. Yet these arrogant SYs keep on giving unsolicited subtle system diagnosis. What can be done to stop this insensitive practise? i do not mind those free of catches to give advise when required. This is because i KNOW those caught up are often just registering their own catches when they give such advise. That is the whole problem with this collective catching mess. The 'sick' are mentally sneezing and coughing on each other and everybody is psychologically diseased. After all, you are also healing others by absorbing the negativity of others. It is all one huge, futile exercise of catch consciousness. And when senior SYs proudly proclaim that you will never be free of catches, chances are you always will remain 'sick'. The whole subtle system crumbles if you insist that the Mother Kundalini is far capable of healing. What are SYs going to talk and impress on others if everyone achieves heights very easily and get healed? Only by making you guilty of catches can they have control as you beg for their catch-free enlightenment. Even this catch-free illumination will never come. So throw all lemons and chillies into the garbage and past ignorance out of the window. Just ask the Mother Kundalini within to heal. > > i also want to know if your present disillusionment > > is caused more by the treatment of some SYs than the > > confusion with Shri Mataji. > > I guess both. Of course it has an effect when people > make me feel bad. I also wonder why there are lots of > Sahaja Yogis who seem very hard and cold, especially > among those who are close to Shri Mataji. Shouldn't > they be the most angel-like, loving and compassionate > people on earth? > i have that same experience with SYs close with Shri Mataji, but my memories are still painful. One of them is of a SYogini loudly scolding my 5-year-old son, accusing him of being on drugs just because she suspected him of scribbled something on the tabla. i know my son is a gentle soul with a very brave heart, but he still burst into tears. How often does a stranger scold you so heartlessly? It hurt me more because i witnessed the whole incident from a blind spot. How could a self-realized soul and woman hurt an innocent child with so much anger? Are all children who scribble on walls and floors on drugs!!??? (This SYogini is still very close with Shri Mataji.) Shouldn't SYs then be the most angel-like, loving and compassionate people on earth? That is what i thought would be the case in the beginning. i was so blissed out by my son's daily experiences of witnessing the Goddess in the Sahasrara that i was awed into humility. There was so much love, innocence and humbleness in me that i became subservient to SYs. All i wanted to do was to serve the devotees of the Shakti for the rest of my life. And SYs were for years almost weekly served with free, fine food cooked with so much love. Such was the inspiration of knowing that the Creator really exists, that there is an eternal afterlife, that we will be judged by our righteous life on Earth that i was even prepared to wash their feet, just like Jesus did to His disciples. i though those longer in Sahaja Yoga would be like me, and definitely better. But in the end all my castles of compassion and dreams of divine humans vanished. My children were ultimately accused of being possessed and demonic in nature. Years of my family's unselfish service to fellow SYs did not even matter - we were evil because our children witnessed the Shakti ............. against their will. In the end my heart became so filled with pain and hurt the Shakti within had to act, even though i never asked for help. i just could not take the pain and disillusionment any more. i wondered how could such people inherit eternal life. My whole family is so glad to be out of the collective. Even my wife, one of the most humble beings i have ever met, does not want to go back and join the collective. She was the one who resisted breaking off the most but now is convinced that it was the right move. The Goddess within has healed us and allowed us to continue this journey. For us it was necessary to leave the collective in order to be free from all fears and conditioning. Now we only meditate with the Shakti within. The Goddess has truly removed all obstacles between myself and Her. The Great Event is a personally journey with absolutely no intermediaries. Don't let them slow you down with that excess baggage. Don't give up just because SYs are not what you thought they would be. If you want to change this world transform yourself first. Others will follow if you are truly enlightened ........................ and it shows in kind words and exemplary deeds. > But my feelings are linked with Shri > Mataji, too. I just don't see her as the loving and > compassionate mother. I always hoped that I would be > one of those who just recognize her, love her and > surrender their lives to her without any doubts or any > confusion. I don't know how many times I prayed that I > would be able to love her like that. I don't know how > many times I have asked in my meditation if she is the > Goddess. In the beginning I got no answers, nothing. > In the end I just felt some sort of a darkness or > negative feeling. > Dasi, i have had so much problems with so few SYs over these years. Even this forum strains my mind and tests my patience at times. Now imagined what tens of thousands of SYs have been capable of doing over decades? i mean having to almost daily deal with complaints, letters, gossip, negativity, in-fighting, power struggles, hate, stupidity and what not. i learnt to be hard after i discovered that many SYs are not angel- like, loving and compassionate. Honestly, i do not feel good telling some members off at this forum. But i have no choice as that is the only way. Some members may think i am not loving and compassionate. The same goes for Shri Mataji. If She had not dealt strongly with some SYs, there will be chaos in Sahaja Yoga. Shri Mataji has also discovered, just like me, that many SYs are not angel-like, loving and compassionate. But that does not mean She is not loving or compassionate. Does my dealing strongly with some members make me insensitive and inconsiderate? If it does than i will have to keep silent and tolerate all to protect my image and reputation as a realized soul. But i am not here to make others respect and admire me, just tell the truth no matter how ego-bruising and loss of members. i think the same goes for Shri Mataji and how She deals with difficult people, and i assure you there are many difficult SYs. Maybe these words from Sir C.P. can throw some light as to how Shri Mataji has struggled to perform Her duty to the Divine despite all obstacles: " I'm not standing up because that would create a problem for the microphone. First of all I'm very honoured, very happy to be here with my wife, and I am also very, very pleased to see all of you, see the faces which show love and divinity and dedication to your Mother. She has been talking about the role of women and that set me athinking. I began to think of the last 48 years that we have been married, and I just want to tell you very briefly how She has performed the role of an ideal wife, an ideal Mother and an ideal grandmother in the family, besides being the spiritual leader of Sahaja Yoga. When we got married I belonged to a very conservative family. She belonged to a very radical family and it was a good complement to each other. But when She came to my house She behaved as if for generations She had lived in a very conservative family and pleased everybody. The old ladies of the house who were looking a little worried, they thought here's a new lady from another province, speaking another language, professing another religion, how will She fit into our family? But what She did was She won over the heart of everyone by behaving in a very modest way, in a very loving way, in a very caring way, and I have to admit that She became the favourite and I was lost. Well that is how our family life began. I was certainly very happy about it. But then I was a bureaucrat, a civil servant, and unfortunately given to idea that absolute honesty must be observed, which meant that we had to live within our means, our salary and all I had to do was to work in office, and I left all the problems of the house to my wife. So I said: " Here's the salary, now do what you can. " And I tell you She managed beautifully within our means. No possibility of anything going wrong. We had two children, two daughters. She brought them up, and brought them up extremely well, arranged for their education, arranged for their marriage. Then they grew up, I didn't know how, for I was from morning until late evening every day in office but ... and She was in charge of the house. She looked after not only my daughters, but I want tell you this. All of us have rich relations and they care for themselves, take care, and we have in India poor relations as well, and when you are in a good position the poor relations flock to you. And they came to our house, children who needed education, and each one of them (we had some sort of hostel running all the time) each one of them was looked after by my wife in the same way as our own daughters; given the same food, given the same affection. Only She could have done that. And they have grown up, they're now in so many places. That was the role She played as a mother. Mother not only to my children, but to the children of the family. And then as we grew further, She had a role to play as my wife. I held some assignments in government in India and abroad in the United Nations. When I was Secretary to the Prime Minister of India, about whom I have written a book now, She was the main motive force behind me. In fact I wouldn't have gone to Mr Shastri if She had not insisted that I must go, and I went and served there. Mr Shastri had very great respect for Her because She was, of course She was obviously a spiritual person but also a very good mother, a very good housewife; and he used to ask Her: " How do you run your house, what are your priorities? " And She would say what She had to say, and Mr Shastri listened to that. Now as a wife She played that role. When I was working with the Prime Minister sometimes I would be in the office till midnight. Why sometimes? Every day. Sometimes till early hours of the morning. But She supported me. She said, " This is your duty now, duty to your country, to your Prime Minister. You must work. Don't worry about the house. Don't worry about the children. I'll take care of them. " Then I went to United Nations. There again, my goodness me, you have to take care of one government was bad enough in India, to take care of 130 governments all over was not easy. Travelling, meeting people, receptions, dinners, a very busy life. But She stood by me, and while doing all that She was at the same time promoting Sahaja Yoga. I don't know how She did it but She has done a wonderful job. You know I saw Sahaja Yoga beginning with four people in London and they were wearing jeans, not very clean either. That was the beginning of Sahaja Yoga. One day I came back home and found a young boy — I'm talking 1974, — young boy sitting in my drawing room, and when I entered the house he looked at me as if I was a stranger, he was the real owner of the house. So I receded. I didn't quite understand, but what surprised me even more was that he was wearing my clothes. I rubbed my eyes. I said: " Am I seeing something real or is it a dream? " Well, then I receded. I came to my wife and I said, " Now who, who is this gentleman? " So She explained. She said, " You know he's a poor young boy, and he was almost lying unattended to, unhelped near Piccadilly Circus. " She had gone out for shopping and She saw him lying almost in a miserable condition. So She stepped out of the car, went to that boy, said: " Why are you lying here, are you alright? " He said no, he was not well at all. She said, " Is there anyone to take care of you? " He said, " No, there's none. " She said, " That's awful. " Then She said, " Okay, hop into the car " , and She brought him home. Then he was given a wash. He had no clothes, so he had to wear my clothes, and that's how he was wearing my clothes. And then for the next some weeks he stayed in the house, and there I saw Sahaja Yoga acting. This boy was suffering from, I think, he was in very bad shape. Within three, four weeks he blossomed. Another three, four weeks became healthy person. And then we got to know that he was from Australia. He was a young engineer who had run away from his house and was in bad shape. After he was cured he became a very good person. He came back to Australia, was united with his mother. I don't know where he is, a Mr Gus, but that was what I saw, the miracle of Sahaja Yoga, and from those four persons, yes four I talked to they.....Once I came home and found four persons wearing jeans, and again I did not know who they were, but they were Sahaja Yogis, and they were the initial Sahaja Yogis. Well, from them to this is a marvel. All I can say is despite all Her attention to the family, to me, (I've been a busy person), She has attended to all the duties of the family; She has created a new universal family of Sahaja Yoga. Each Sahaja Yogi in my view is an angel. And I mean this. I mean this because I have known human beings in the world. The world is terrible. If you look at newspapers you will see all kinds of horror stories, but when you meet a Sahaja Yogi, he or she is a very different person. The face is different, the inner self is different, the outer self is different. It's another creation. And She has created thousands and thousands of such persons. Each one of you is a miracle. You know, it's very difficult to transform human beings. I have worked in United Nations, in India, for 40 years. I cannot honestly say that I was able to transform even one human being. Yes, people followed my example and worked hard, but that's not transformation. Transformation is what I see in you. And that is a miracle. That is what She has done. And now a new world is being created. I sincerely hope that Sahaja Yoga will spread more rapidly. It has spread very, very fast but it needs to spread very much faster. And all over the world there's a race between the forces of good and the forces of evil. You represent the force of good — the forces of evil outside. Have the heart, have the courage. She, Her vibrations and your vibrations will, I hope envelop the world and create a good world, and this bad world will be suppressed, will disappear. This is all that I can say. I thank you very much for receiving me here. I'm delighted to be in Australia. I have liked my visit immensely already. I think in Australia the beautiful thing is that the advantages of a developed world are present here, but the heart seems to be very good, very sound, wonderful. You are open- hearted people, warm people, loving people, and I cannot say how very, very ... I cannot say adequately how very happy I am and how very grateful. I thank you, Ma'am, for letting me come to Australia and I am going to enjoy my stay, so that's all that I can say. " Sir C.P. Srivastava Melbourne Airport, Australia, February 19, 1995 Dasi, you don't know how many times you have asked in your meditation if she is the Goddess. Let me tell you of something similar. i once told my son to ask Jesus if indeed Shri Mataji is the Comforter. i told him that although we all know She is, i just want to ask Him. When Kash meditated and requested permission to approach Jesus the Goddess gently rejected permission. This incident is one of those rare occasions when She refused to accommodate a request. The question was not only frivolous but insulting to the Savior as well since we all knew She is the Comforter sent by Him. Dasi, i am giving you evidence and testimony that She is the Goddess within. If i ask Her the same question you did i am sure there will be no answer. And i don't think She will answer any other question either. Only the SILENCE answers all questions. Just learn to listen to IT. > > Just want to be sure. You also mentioned that you > > are/were a SYogini. Are you out/still hanging on/just > > not sure? > > I would say that I am out of Sahaja Yoga. But I am > confused and not sure if I have done the right thing. > Learn from the mystics banished for what they know and proclaim, not the ignorant, cowardly priests who rule the collective temples. Even if you do not remain you must always seek the company of spiritual people. Do not ever abandon the path to seek the Divine. And seek a guru or path that embraces all religions, prophets and scriptures. Seek the Shakti who is entrenched in all traditions. Only after meeting the Divine Mother is liberation possible. So where else does the Goddess reside, if not in your own Sahasara? jagbir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 Jagbir, Thank you for your kind and encouraging words. There's something I'd like to comment and ask. >Shri Mataji has told SYs to stop checking chakras of >others and take >care of themselves. This is because people, especially >newcomers, >have been hurt by them. Yet these arrogant SYs keep on >giving >unsolicited subtle system diagnosis. What can be done >to stop this >insensitive practise? I know what you mean. I did not like that some yogis were always checking if this or that person is all right. I am not so egoless that I would not mind my subtle system being monitored. But although that was irksome it did not hurt my feelings so much. What hurt me most was that when I tried to talk about my doubts and problems and was asking questions I was told that I am negative. The fact that I have not been able to love and recognize Shri Mataji and have had bad feelings about her is too much. >i have that same experience with SYs close with Shri >Mataji, but my >memories are still painful. One of them is of a >SYogini loudly >scolding my 5-year-old son, accusing him of being on >drugs just >because she suspected him of scribbled something on >the tabla. i >know my son is a gentle soul with a very brave heart, >but he still >burst into tears. How often does a stranger scold you >so heartlessly? I am sorry to hear that. Children who I know scribble something almost everywhere. I think it a good lesson for us adults to learn what is really important in this world, material things or the joy that children get from their scribbling. >It hurt me more because i witnessed the whole incident >from a blind >spot. How could a self-realized soul and woman hurt an >innocent >child with so much anger? Are all children who >scribble on walls and >floors on drugs!!??? (This SYogini is still very close >with Shri >Mataji.) This is what I mean. Maybe that Sahaja Yogini had a bad day. And some people get easily irritated by children. But if she is always cold-hearted like that, does not Shri Mataji's close presence have any effect? If she gets Mother's love, shouldn't she also emit Mother's love? >Shouldn't SYs then be the most angel-like, loving and >compassionate >people on earth? That is what i thought would be the >case in the >beginning. i was so blissed out by my son's daily >experiences of >witnessing the Goddess in the Sahasrara that i was >awed into >humility. There was so much love, innocence and >humbleness in me >that i became subservient to SYs. All i wanted to do >was to serve >the devotees of the Shakti for the rest of my life. >And SYs were for >years almost weekly served with free, fine food cooked >with so much >love. Such was the inspiration of knowing that the >Creator really >exists, that there is an eternal afterlife, that we >will be judged >by our righteous life on Earth that i was even >prepared to wash >their feet, just like Jesus did to His disciples. i >though those >longer in Sahaja Yoga would be like me, and definitely >better. >But in the end all my castles of compassion and dreams >of divine >humans vanished. My children were ultimately accused >of being >possessed and demonic in nature. Years of my family's >unselfish >service to fellow SYs did not even matter - we were >evil because our >children witnessed the Shakti ............. against >their will. How is it possible? Did they ever say why? Does Shri Mataji know about this and if she knows what is her opinion? >My whole family is so glad to be out of the >collective. Even my >wife, one of the most humble beings i have ever met, >does not want >to go back and join the collective. She was the one >who resisted >breaking off the most but now is convinced that it was >the right >move. The Goddess within has healed us and allowed us >to continue >this journey. For us it was necessary to leave the >collective in >order to be free from all fears and conditioning. Now >we only >meditate with the Shakti within. When you say that you only meditate with the Shakti within, don't you pay any attention to Shri Mataji as a guru and as an incarnation? >i learnt to be hard after i discovered that many SYs >are not angel- >like, loving and compassionate. But it is odd...is there no power in the kundalini awakening then? In the talk by Sir CP that you also sent here Sir CP said that all the Sahaja Yogis are like angels, that Shri Mataji has transformed them. Is Sir CP wrong? Is Shri Mataji not able to transfrom her disciples? Honestly, i do not >feel good telling >some members off at this forum. But i have no choice >as that is the >only way. Some members may think i am not loving and >compassionate. >The same goes for Shri Mataji. If She had not dealt >strongly with >some SYs, there will be chaos in Sahaja Yoga. Shri >>Mataji discovered, just like me, that many SYs are >not angel-like, loving >and compassionate. But she still has so many hard and cold people around her. She has not dealt with them strongly. >Dasi, you don't know how many times you have asked in >your >meditation if she is the Goddess. Let me tell you of >something >similar. >i once told my son to ask Jesus if indeed Shri Mataji >is the >Comforter. i told him that although we all know She >is, i just want >to ask Him. When Kash meditated and requested >permission to approach >Jesus the Goddess gently rejected permission. This >incident is one >of those rare occasions when She refused to >accommodate a request. >The question was not only frivolous but insulting to >the Savior as >well since we all knew She is the Comforter sent by >Him. But I don't! And Sahaja Yogis (like the one here) told me to ask that question. Now you say that these questions should not be asked. Why did everybody else get some great answer when they asked that question? Does the Goddess answer them but not us? How is it possible? Are those answers Sahaja Yogis get just imagination? >Dasi, i am giving you evidence and testimony that She >is the Goddess >within. If i ask Her the same question you did i am >sure there will >be no answer. And i don't think She will answer any >other question >either. Only the SILENCE answers all questions. Just >learn to listen >to IT. But I do listen to the silence. I feel that the Goddess comes to me in silence and emits love, understanding...it is like merging with the whole Universe. She IS the silence. Still I don't see the connection between the silence and Shri Mataji. On the contrary, Shri Mataji takes me AWAY from it. >Learn from the mystics banished for what they know and >proclaim, not >the ignorant, cowardly priests who rule the collective >temples. Even >if you do not remain you must always seek the company >of spiritual >people. The problem is that after being in Sahaja Yoga I am afraid of most spiritual or religious people. It is difficult to find people who are spiritual and still humane. Dasi ______________________ Messenger - Communicate instantly... " Ping " your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger./download/index.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2004 Report Share Posted December 19, 2004 shriadishakti , A L <vindhyavasinidasi> wrote: > > Jagbir, > > Thank you for your kind and encouraging words. > There's something I'd like to comment and ask. > > > >Shri Mataji has told SYs to stop checking chakras of > >others and take > >care of themselves. This is because people, > especially >newcomers, > >have been hurt by them. Yet these arrogant SYs keep > on >giving > >unsolicited subtle system diagnosis. What can be done > >to stop this > >insensitive practise? > > I know what you mean. I did not like that some yogis > were always checking if this or that person is all > right. I am not so egoless that I would not mind my > subtle system being monitored. But although that was > irksome it did not hurt my feelings so much. What hurt > me most was that when I tried to talk about my doubts > and problems and was asking questions I was told that > I am negative. The fact that I have not been able to > love and recognize Shri Mataji and have had bad > feelings about her is too much. > There is nothing i can do to make you change your feelings about Her. You have not been able to understand what it takes to transform humans i.e. dealing with all sorts of characters. There is bound to be conflicts in any human organization. How they are resolved is subjective. What may be regarded as enlightenment by some may be viewed as high-handedness by others. Charging a few thousands dollars for a series of mantras or scaling up the Scientology grades may be reasonable for many but charging $108 for pujas may be highway robbery to others. It is all in your mind. > > >i have that same experience with SYs close with Shri > >Mataji, but my > >memories are still painful. One of them is of a > >SYogini loudly > >scolding my 5-year-old son, accusing him of being on > >drugs just > >because she suspected him of scribbled something on > >the tabla. i > >know my son is a gentle soul with a very brave heart, > >but he still > >burst into tears. How often does a stranger scold you > >so heartlessly? > > I am sorry to hear that. Children who I know scribble > something almost everywhere. I think it a good lesson > for us adults to learn what is really important in > this world, material things or the joy that children > get from their scribbling. > > >It hurt me more because i witnessed the whole > incident >from a blind > >spot. How could a self-realized soul and woman hurt > an >innocent > >child with so much anger? Are all children who > >scribble on walls and > >floors on drugs!!??? (This SYogini is still very > close >with Shri > >Mataji.) > > This is what I mean. Maybe that Sahaja Yogini had a > bad day. And some people get easily irritated by > children. But if she is always cold-hearted like that, > does not Shri Mataji's close presence have any effect? > If she gets Mother's love, shouldn't she also emit > Mother's love? The vast majority of SYoginis are loving, nurturing and compassionate. That was the only incident i had of a negative SYogini. Yes, maybe she may have had a bad day but i was shocked at her behavior. But picking one SYogini and questioning why she cannot emit Mother's Love is asking for way too much. It is just like looking at thousands of shining stars and picking one that has less lustre, and wondering what went wrong. You should know that Shri Mataji has transformed tens of thousands of people to live better, spiritual lives. Putting our attention on a few fallen ones will always create doubts in our minds about Shri Mataji abilities. > > >Shouldn't SYs then be the most angel-like, loving and > >compassionate > >people on earth? That is what i thought would be the > >case in the > >beginning. i was so blissed out by my son's daily > >experiences of > >witnessing the Goddess in the Sahasrara that i was > >awed into > >humility. There was so much love, innocence and > >humbleness in me > >that i became subservient to SYs. All i wanted to do > >was to serve > >the devotees of the Shakti for the rest of my life. > >And SYs were for > >years almost weekly served with free, fine food > cooked >with so much > >love. Such was the inspiration of knowing that the > >Creator really > >exists, that there is an eternal afterlife, that we > >will be judged > >by our righteous life on Earth that i was even > >prepared to wash > >their feet, just like Jesus did to His disciples. i > >though those > >longer in Sahaja Yoga would be like me, and > definitely >better. > > >But in the end all my castles of compassion and > dreams >of divine > >humans vanished. My children were ultimately accused > >of being > >possessed and demonic in nature. Years of my family's > >unselfish > >service to fellow SYs did not even matter - we were > >evil because our > >children witnessed the Shakti ............. against > >their will. > > How is it possible? Did they ever say why? Does Shri > Mataji know about this and if she knows what is her > opinion? > This is a long story that is still unfolding. > > >My whole family is so glad to be out of the > >collective. Even my > >wife, one of the most humble beings i have ever met, > >does not want > >to go back and join the collective. She was the one > >who resisted > >breaking off the most but now is convinced that it > was >the right > >move. The Goddess within has healed us and allowed us > >to continue > >this journey. For us it was necessary to leave the > >collective in > >order to be free from all fears and conditioning. Now > >we only > >meditate with the Shakti within. > > When you say that you only meditate with the Shakti > within, don't you pay any attention to Shri Mataji as > a guru and as an incarnation? > No - there is nothing external to pay attention to. i just meditate on the Adi Shakti within my Sahasrara. > > >i learnt to be hard after i discovered that many SYs > >are not angel- > >like, loving and compassionate. > > But it is odd...is there no power in the kundalini > awakening then? In the talk by Sir CP that you also > sent here Sir CP said that all the Sahaja Yogis are > like angels, that Shri Mataji has transformed them. Is > Sir CP wrong? Is Shri Mataji not able to transfrom her > disciples? > As i said before most SYs are kind, considerate and loving. Yes, Sir CP said that all the Sahaja Yogis are like angels and Shri Mataji has transformed them. i don't see anything false about this statement. Can you name me one guru/religious organization that has been able to make their followers unconditionally embrace all religions, ther messengers and scriptures? How is it possible for so many SYs who were former drunks, drug adicts, social misfits, hippies etc. to give up all these vices and believe in the Divine? Why do you feel Sir CP is wrong and Shri Mataji is not able to transform her disciples? It just does not make sense. > Honestly, i do not >feel good telling > >some members off at this forum. But i have no choice > >as that is the > >only way. Some members may think i am not loving and > >compassionate. > >The same goes for Shri Mataji. If She had not dealt > >strongly with > >some SYs, there will be chaos in Sahaja Yoga. Shri > >>Mataji discovered, just like me, that many SYs are > >not angel-like, loving > >and compassionate. > > But she still has so many hard and cold people around > her. She has not dealt with them strongly. > i wonder why you think they must be dealt strongly. Did they murder, rape or embezzle? What is the seriousness of their crimes that has left you unsatisfied? Have you witnessed them first-hand or just depending on rumours and hearsay? Shri Mataji has expelled a number of leaders from Sahaja Yoga for wrongdoings. Are you not satisfied by Her having the guts to expell those capable of damaging Sahaja Yoga once out of the organization? Why do you think you know better? > > >Dasi, you don't know how many times you have asked in > >your > >meditation if she is the Goddess. Let me tell you of > >something > >similar. > > >i once told my son to ask Jesus if indeed Shri Mataji > >is the > >Comforter. i told him that although we all know She > >is, i just want > >to ask Him. When Kash meditated and requested > >permission to approach > >Jesus the Goddess gently rejected permission. This > >incident is one > >of those rare occasions when She refused to > >accommodate a request. > >The question was not only frivolous but insulting to > >the Savior as > >well since we all knew She is the Comforter sent by > >Him. > > But I don't! And Sahaja Yogis (like the one here) told > me to ask that question. Now you say that these > questions should not be asked. Why did everybody else > get some great answer when they asked that question? > Does the Goddess answer them but not us? How is it > possible? Are those answers Sahaja Yogis get just > imagination? > They are ALL asking the vibrations and that is how they get answers. i am surprised that you did not know this fundamental fact. > >Dasi, i am giving you evidence and testimony that She > >is the Goddess > >within. If i ask Her the same question you did i am > >sure there will > >be no answer. And i don't think She will answer any > >other question > >either. Only the SILENCE answers all questions. Just > >learn to listen > >to IT. > > But I do listen to the silence. I feel that the > Goddess comes to me in silence and emits love, > understanding...it is like merging with the whole > Universe. She IS the silence. Still I don't see the > connection between the silence and Shri Mataji. On the > contrary, Shri Mataji takes me AWAY from it. > If you are truly in Silence nothing can take you away from anything. Shri Mataji IS the incarantion of the Goddess within. After 10 years and thousands of visits in the Sahasrara there is no way anyone can demolish this Truth. There is just no way any human can do so, unless of course they just do not want to believe. They must logically deny all the evidence i have presented so far and will present in the future. There is just no way anyone can do so. Whether humans believe or not is immaterial. In the end it is the Divine Message that matters and you know what it is. Denying that Shri Mataji is the Goddess does nothing to diminish that Message. It will stand on this Earth as long as it exists! > > >Learn from the mystics banished for what they know > and >proclaim, not > >the ignorant, cowardly priests who rule the > collective >temples. Even > >if you do not remain you must always seek the company > >of spiritual > >people. > > The problem is that after being in Sahaja Yoga I am > afraid of most spiritual or religious people. It is > difficult to find people who are spiritual and still > humane. > It is the Divine Message that matters after all. You are free to do as you wish. jagbir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2004 Report Share Posted December 20, 2004 Jagbir, I feel that you got angy with me and now make me feel ignorant and stupid. Maybe you are right about that, but I am not revengeful like you suggested. And why tell me first that this is a safe place to talk when your reaction to my doubts and questions is just the same as those Sahaja Yogis' who hurt me? Do you think that after one nice and kind message my doubts will be cleared just like that and suddenly I start feeling positive about Shri Mataji? I don't understand some other things either. First you say that you are disappointed with Sahaja Yogis and don't want to be in the collective. Now you say that you have only met one negative Sahaja Yogini and most Sahaja Yogis are just like angels. If they are, why are you out of the collective then? Didn't Shri Mataji say that it is important to be in the collective? Don't her words matter? Dasi ______________________ Messenger - Communicate instantly... " Ping " your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger./download/index.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2004 Report Share Posted December 20, 2004 shriadishakti , A L <vindhyavasinidasi> wrote: > > Jagbir, > > I feel that you got angy with me and now make me feel > ignorant and stupid. Maybe you are right about that, > but I am not revengeful like you suggested. And why > tell me first that this is a safe place to talk when > your reaction to my doubts and questions is just the > same as those Sahaja Yogis' who hurt me? Do you think > that after one nice and kind message my doubts will be > cleared just like that and suddenly I start feeling > positive about Shri Mataji? > Dasi, Why are you so sure that i am angry with you? How have i made you into an ignorant and stupid person? If you are going to be so sensitive then it will be difficult to be honest and truthful because the ego gets bruised. So what made you feel ignorant and stupid, and think that i was angry? ------------ > > >i learnt to be hard after i discovered that many SYs > >are not angel- > >like, loving and compassionate. > > But it is odd...is there no power in the kundalini > awakening then? In the talk by Sir CP that you also > sent here Sir CP said that all the Sahaja Yogis are > like angels, that Shri Mataji has transformed them. Is > Sir CP wrong? Is Shri Mataji not able to transform her > disciples? > As i said before most SYs are kind, considerate and loving. Yes, Sir CP said that all the Sahaja Yogis are like angels and Shri Mataji has transformed them. i don't see anything false about this statement. Can you name me one guru/religious organization that has been able to make their followers unconditionally embrace all religions, their messengers and scriptures? How is it possible for so many SYs who were former drunks, drug addicts, social misfits, hippies etc. to give up all these vices and believe in the Divine? Why do you feel Sir CP is wrong and Shri Mataji is not able to transform her disciples? It just does not make sense. ----------- Maybe the above answer made you feel that way. But what is so hurtful about it? You are doubting Shri Mataji is able to transform humans, even implying that Sir CP could be wrong! i am trying to make you understand that is just not true because Sir CP just does not make bombastic statements. He is a very distinguished diplomat who served as Secretary General of the UN International Maritime Organization for a record term of 16 years. Sir C.P. Srivastava is himself distinguished not only as India's most decorated civil servant but also as the first Indian to be knighted by Queen Elizabeth II for his contribution to the United Nations. You just don't accuse such eminent beings of being wrong, especially when he has been married to Her for more than half a century. He knows Shri Mataji far more than anyone else. That is why his words carry weight and we have to respect his point of view. However i think you are doubting him because of he used the word " angel " . Perhaps that is all there it to it. But " angel " is just a figure of speech. And Sir CP says they are LIKE angels, not angels. Please try to understand what people are trying to say when such descriptive terms are used. Does President Bush's " axis of evil " make all Iraqis, Iranians and North Koreans into wicked beings? Does greeting others with " Good Morning " make the morning better or subject to arguments? They are all figures of speech. A figure of speech, sometimes termed a rhetorical figure or device, or elocution, is a word or phrase that departs from straightforward, literal language. Figures of speech are often used and crafted for emphasis, freshness of expression, or clarity. However, clarity may also suffer from their use when Oprah Winfrey, along with millions of others, say so often " You are an angel. " At least Sir CP was more precise, truthful and less flattering when he used the term " like angels " . ------------- > But she still has so many hard and cold people around > her. She has not dealt with them strongly. > i wonder why you think they must be dealt strongly. Did they murder, rape or embezzle? What is the seriousness of their crimes that has left you unsatisfied? Have you witnessed them first-hand or just depending on rumours and hearsay? Shri Mataji has expelled a number of leaders from Sahaja Yoga for wrongdoings. Are you not satisfied by Her having the guts to expell those capable of damaging Sahaja Yoga once out of the organization? Why do you think you know better? ----------- i think you are very judgmental when you say " she still has so many hard and cold people around her. She has not dealt with them strongly. " In fact you are accusing all of them of some imaginary crime which, in your case, is being hard and cold. Maybe your comprehension of " hard and cold " may actually be a case of quiet, stoic, meditative individuals. Have you met all of them personally? Maybe they are busy carrying out their duties. Maybe they have met funny people and try not to waste their energies when it can be better used. There are so many reasons and we are just speculating. For all we know they may actually be very warm, nice and friendly people. The video tapes of pujas and public programs are proof of what i am saying. Where are the " many hard and cold people around her " that you have seen? Yes, many one or two may be hard and cold and that is a big MAYBE. But you are speaking of many hard and cold people. This is just not true Dasi. Now i am wondering why you want them to be punished and that Shri Mataji must deal with them strongly. What have they done wrong? Why do you feel they must be punished? Why do you think you know better? If asking you to justify your accusations with solid facts make you think i am angry, what can i really ask you then? And the fact is that i am not. i am just asking questions that strip accusations of falsehood and expose the naked truth. Please do not expect me to butter you just to make you believe in Shri Mataji. > I don't understand some other things either. First you > say that you are disappointed with Sahaja Yogis and > don't want to be in the collective. Now you say that > you have only met one negative Sahaja Yogini and most > Sahaja Yogis are just like angels. If they are, why > are you out of the collective then? Didn't Shri Mataji > say that it is important to be in the collective? > Don't her words matter? > > i am very disappointed with SYs because they do not have the courage and conviction to announce the Last Judgment and Resurrection. i am also very concerned about the way they put so much emphasis on cleansing chakras and treatments. i am appalled by the fear exhibited by some SYs regarding all types of evil entities - cats, bats, bhoots, spiders and what not. Yes, i met only one negative SY because of what she did. Perhaps she has improved since. My definition of " negative' may not be what others think it is. We will start splitting hairs is we try to argue about this. Most SYs are LIKE angels, not angels and don't get me wrong this time. All humans who try to live a honest righteous life, believe in God and love ALL others are LIKE angels. i am sure millions of priests, pastors, reverends, bishops, popes, rabbis, clerics, imams, mullahs, shaikhs, ulema, ayatollahs, gurus, swamis, pandits, brahmins, acaryas, bhagwans, granthis, gianis, lamas, monks, dalai lamas have described humans as angels. So please do not crucify me if i think SYs are like angels, not angels. i came out of the collective because it was necessary for me to heal myself. When others think your children are possessed for having that cosmic vision it is time to protect your family by isolation. Moreover my views are very strong and opposed to what SYs are doing to spread the advent of Shri Mataji. At the time i leaving i was already begin to argue and question the integrity of SYs. i still am. Yes, Shri Mataji did say to be collective. This is crucial for initial growth. Once the kundalini is established you have to ascend. It becomes necessary to be in Collective Consciousness. Many SYs are still in local collective consciousness. They still have not understood what She means by being collective. Shri Mataji has said exactly what i am telling you. Yes, Her words do matter. It all depends on how you comprehend their deeper meanings. That is why it is necessary to listen to Her tapes many times ................... unless you depend on the SILENCE by meditating on Her in the Sahasrara. The SILENCE will teach you the true meaning of being collective. jagbir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.