What about William Blake?

[Guest guest]

Let's leave that all side.

 

I am curious to know how you think about William Blake? I didn't have

answer to this question. Why did moderators delete his texts, is he

banned too?

 

Jukkaji

[Guest guest]

, " jukkasavelainen "

<jukkasavelainen> wrote:

> Let's leave that all side.

>

> I am curious to know how you think about William Blake? I didn't

> have answer to this question. Why did moderators delete his texts,

> is he banned too?

>

> Jukkaji

 

i am not privy to the moderators' decisions on the new forum. The

same goes to why William Blake's text were deleted. i believe it is

because you are reading his works through a rather large magnifying

glass and trying to justify your own views. Quoting sheets of

William Blake (or any author for the matter) and justifying it

represents Shri Mataji's views is like looking through the wrong end

of a telescope. What we SYs see is an insignificant aspect of Shri

Mataji vision.

 

But for you William Blake (and your Finnish authors, some of whom

have gone all the way to Rome) is awe-inspiring ..............

and those who delete his posts should be drawn and quartered on

Earth itself. (i shudder to think of the punishments due to them for

what you regard as blasphemous, or something to that effect.)

 

By your own admission you know so little of the incarnations,

religions and the scriptures. What do you think Sahaja Yoga and the

Divine Message of Shri Mataji is all about?

 

jagbir

[Guest guest]

Jagbir wrote:

" i am not privy to the moderators' decisions on the new forum. "

 

Semira: Surely it would be more democratic and better run if you

were. It is possible for people to disagree, or state their views in

a discussion politely, without cruelty and degradation. At present

it is not possible for anyone to have a friendly open discussion, or

to share views in an honest and relaxed manner. Sahaja Yoga is about

the internal transformation of an individual, and is not about being

restricted into theories and texts, whereby the individual

experience is obliterated. The new forum should be promoting

discussion, not obstructing it. However can deeper understanding of

our free spiritual self be attained by constructing barriers?

 

 

Jagbir wrote: " The same goes to why William Blake's text were

deleted. i believe it is

because you are reading his works through a rather large magnifying

glass and trying to justify your own views. Quoting sheets of

William Blake (or any author for the matter) and justifying it

represents Shri Mataji's views is like looking through the wrong end

of a telescope. What we SYs see is an insignificant aspect of Shri

Mataji vision. "

 

Semira: I believe that in the deleted post of Blake's text there

were no personal views stated, simply the text and some comments on

Blake's life by outside critics. Clearly Blake is a realised author,

writing with great insight on the difficult subjects of sexuality,

spirituality and religious behaviour. If SYs saw in Blake's text an

insignificant aspect of Shri Mataji's vision, well, then there would

be no reason whatsoever to delete it. I put it to you that the text

was deleted because it so obviously does not 'fit in' with the

narrow-mindedness of the conditioned religious mind. The text was

deleted because of the fear at the message contained in it.

 

Jagbir wrote:'But for you William Blake (and your Finnish authors,

some of whom

have gone all the way to Rome) is awe-inspiring ..............

and those who delete his posts should be drawn and quartered on

Earth itself. (i shudder to think of the punishments due to them for

what you regard as blasphemous, or something to that effect.) "

 

Semira: I don't think that Jukka anywhere mentioned wrath and

punishment for his posts being deleted. He loves the Poets, and

their creations, it is as simple as this. Looking at the posting

carefully, most of Jukkas posts have been defensive, against the

attacks he got for stating his views. You surely must have noticed,

Jagbir, the cruel and hurtful words of the moderators. To tell

someone that they will certainly be going to hell, that their

posting is nonsense, that they are not realised, that they are anti-

sahaja, that they are negative, is surely not what the Divine

Message is about. Is this not being rather judgemental, the very

thing we are advised against?

 

Jagbir wrote: " By your own admission you know so little of the

incarnations,

religions and the scriptures. What do you think Sahaja Yoga and the

Divine Message of Shri Mataji is all about? "

 

Semira: Yes, Sahaja Yoga and the Divine Message of Shri Mataji is

about the incarnations, the religions and the scriptures, in all

their entirety. We should not pick and choose which writings of

realised souls fit in with our current ideas and personal barriers

or not. We should consider the writings of all realised souls; they

all complement the same message of the Spirit within, there is no

contradiction of this.

We all share the same vision, of the Divine Message reaching all

individuals, that each may know the Truth, that the Adi Shakti is

within each of us, unbound by the external illusions of the physical

world. Let us try to be kind, patient and gentle with each other,

and put disagreements behind us, without anger and bitterness.

With much love, Semira

[Guest guest]

mahAbuddhih : The Great Intelligence.

 

When the intelligence is directed towards her, nothing remains to be

known. The Sruti [Cha. Up., VI. 1] says, " which, when known, the

whole universe is known. " or, from whom one obtains the highest

[mahat] intelligence.

 

BhAskararAya's Commentary

Translated into English by R. Ananthakrishna Sastry

 

 

adishai_sahaja_yoga, " semirafields "

<semirafields> wrote:

> Jagir wote:

> " i am norivy tators' decisns ohe new foum. "

>

> Sema: Surelt would democatic and bter run if you ere. It is poible

for people to digree, or stt a discion polily,

witut cruey and degration. At for anone to have a fridly open

discion, or mnner. Sahaja Yoa is about he inrnal and xts, wreby the

individuperience is obliterated. The new frum shld be proting

> discuion, not self be atned by consucting barrs?

>

>

> Jbir wote: " The samoes to why William Bke's ause you are reading

his workhrough a rather large Quong seets of

> Williake (or any auor for the matter) and jtifying it

> represes Shri Matajiiews is an insignificanpect of Shri

> Mataji vion. "

>

> Sera: I beeve thahe deleted post oke's text there

> wee no personewscritics. Clarlake is a reased athor,

> writing with greasight on the difficult subjects ouality,

> spiritualitnd religioehaviour. Is saw in Blake's text