group/sahajamatch - http://groups..com/group/sahajamatch/

[Guest guest]

JSM,

 

No the links are very much active.

 

sahajamatch/

 

and we are growing...!!

 

JSM,

Prerna

 

 

, " jagbir singh "

<adishakti_org> wrote:

>

> Dear Mahesh et all,

>

> Prerna has deleted the links.

>

> i just wanted to know what about people like me who children are

> regarded as possessed and demonic? Since i am not a SY in the eyes

> of WCASY and thus cannot use their matchmaking services what

choice

> do i have for my kids? Do you know i am in the process of getting

my

> eldest son married to a non-SY? The thought of using the services

of

> SY marriage brokers did not even cross my mind because since my

> family members are all outcasts i did not want to give them the

> pleasure of rejecting my son's marraige application.

>

> More questions: Since Shri Mataji does not personally match the

> couples who has the power? Do you think those humans now 'endowned

> with the powers to matchmake' can make a better choice than SY

> parents to find partners for their children? Will SYs be

> increasingly dependent on a WCASY sanctioned marriage similar to

> those perfromed and sanctified by churches and temples? Will such

> powers be abused, as they clearly are in my case, to punish those

> not towing the offiical line/rules by preventing marriages?

>

> i know what Shri Mataji said a decade or two about marriages. But

> She has now almost completely receded from physical sight and

those

> taking over and presenting Her Will are not following the Dharma.

Do

> i join them by closing the websites and pretend Sahaja Yoga is

about kundalini awakening for the sake of getting a SY daughter-in-

law or do i resist and stand my ground that it is about the Divine

Message to humanity delivered by the Adi Shakti?

>

> Jai Shri Mataji,

>

>

> jagbir

>

> , mahesh khatri

> <maheshkhatri> wrote:

> >

> > This New group should be closed immediately. Prerna you need

some

> meditation. Ask Shri Mataji's forgiveness for indulging in

antisahaj

> activities. Shri Ganesh is not going to like it and it could be

> dangerous for you to play with fire.

> >

> > Jai Shri Mataji

> >

> > Mahesh Khatri

> >

> > india107 sahaji <india335> wrote:

> > This is absurd Prena.

> > If u are not aware of what ur doing, then please read

> > the following word of Shri Mataji.

> >

> > Raksha-Bandhan and Maryadas for Sahaja Yogis

> >

> > Shri Mataji,

> > Hounslow, London

> > 11th

> > Aug. 1984

> >

> > Today is a very great day of Rakshabandhan. So I have

> > to tell

> > you something about Raksha-bandhan. Before that we

> > have to

> > talk about the maryadas (boundaries of pure

> > relationships)

> > that have to be observed by Sahaja Yogis.

> > One of the things I discovered here, in the West, that

> > though

> > we have understood the importance of Mooladhara, which

> > is a

> > very important thing, that unless and until we

> > establish our

> > Mooladhara fully we are not going to have speediest

> > ascent.

> > Despite all that, there are lingering things you see

> > around.

> > Like, people start choosing their life-partners in

> > Sahaja

> > Yoga. That is not allowed. That is not allowed.

> > You are not to spoil your Ashrams, your centres -

> > using them

> > for a marriage searching society. You must respect

> > this point,

> > you must respect. If you have to marry, then you can

> > find your

> > life partners 'outside' Sahaja Yoga - to begin with -

> > But if

> > you want to marry 'in' Sahaja Yoga, then you should

> > not go on

> > searching people in Sahaja Yoga. It is 'very

> > dangerous' thing

> > for Sahaja Yoga itself, and for you people. That is

> > one thing

> > one should 'never' try to do with Sahaja Yoga. For all

> > practical purposes you are brothers and sisters. And

> > that's

> > why I always encouraged marriage between people who

> > belong to

> > another country or another centres.

> > As we are now having a big marriage programme, I would

> > say

> > that most of the

> > marriages which were done like that, are 'very'

> > successful

> > than the marriages that were selected and were done.

> > It's very

> > wrong to do such a thing as to arrange your marriage

> > with a

> > Sahaja Yogi by yourself. It will be dangerous. I don't

> > want to

> > say anything; but it wouldn't turn out to be good

> > because it

> > is anti-God activity. Absolutely anti-God. You are

> > supposed to

> > develop your brahmacharya, you are supposed to develop

> > your

> > Mooladhara. Instead of that if you start using a

> > Sahaja Yogini

> > or a Sahaja Yogi for the selection of your married

> > life, it's

> > going to be very very troublesome, your Mooladhara is

> > not

> > going to settle down. I mean that's a bad stroke for

> > your

> > development.

> > Because of the background and the kind of the

> > conditioning you

> > have had, you people don't understand that it is

> > important to

> > maintain the purity of the centres. And of every

> > place. So any

> > such relationship in one city is a very very wrong

> > thing. It

> > spoils everyone. To add up to the trouble, it's a

> > habit of

> > people, I have heard, that they try to tease that

> > ''you look

> > better together'', ''you're nice together''. They

> > 'tease' and

> > enjoy. It's a kind of a very perverted enjoyment of

> > mooladhara. To tease others, ''You are looking very

> > nice with

> > him, and you better marry him.'' It's a kind of a

> > romantic non-

> > sense.

> > Of course, for all this, yogis - they have to have a

> > Brahmacharya. But even if you can't have brahmacharya.

> > You

> > must have 'Maryadas.' Not to tease each other and

> > enjoy that

> > kind of a non-sense, when the marriage is not settled;

> > - if

> > marriage is settled it is alright. And this kills

> > completely

> > the joy of marriage. because there is no curiosity

> > left. And

> > many a times I find that 'absurd' relations are

> > established.

> > Some of them are really no good. And they will really

> > be

> > detrimental and some of them are never established. So

> > if they

> > are established, they are wrong, and if they are not

> > established, they are heartbreaking.

> > So all this kind of thing you should not do. You have

> > got

> > experiences of people who married outside and brought

> > 'wonderful' people to Sahaja Yoga. If you can do it,

> > you

> > should do it. If you have to marry Sahaja Yogi, you

> > should not

> > marry them at the cost of destroying the purity and

> > the

> > idealism it has. For your own sake, for your 'own'

> > pleasures

> > you should not spoil the name of Sahaja Yoga.

> > That is one thing I have seen, so I would say that

> > today, as

> > it is the day of purity between relationships, let us

> > know

> > that you have to treat each other as brothers and

> > sisters. No

> > such play should be followed. Don't allow your mind to

> > drift

> > into this. Because if you allow, then there's no end

> > to it. As

> > it is, you know how hard it is to bring you back to

> > normalcy.

> > When Christ had said, " Thou shalt not have adulterous

> > eyes " ,

> > He did not say it because it was not practical. It is

> > quite

> > practical for Sahaja Yogis. And there is nothing to

> > worry

> > about marriages so much, what is so important ? So

> > many are

> > married and what has happened to them. 'Even' with the

> > Sahaja

> > Yoga marriage, some have failed because of these bad

> > habits.

> > So you 'better' get rid of these bad habits before

> > marriage.

> > Because after marriage also they go on like this, and

> > searching for boys and girls. Because if these habits

> > are not

> > curbed, 'before' marriage, then they go on lingering

> > on. So,

> > one should not try to do all these things before

> > marriage. And

> > I have seen such marriages are never, never successful

> > so far.

> > And even if they are, it is a sort of make-believe

> > thing. It

> > doesn't give real joy, it's a joyless pursuit. May be

> > in one

> > case - may be - successful, that does not mean that

> > you take

> > help from such difficult things, but have 'normal'

> > marriage

> > which are enjoyable, which have created permanent

> > bondages

> > between people.

> >

> >

> > --- sahajamatch <sahajamatch> wrote:

> >

> > > JSM,

> > >

> > > We introduce a new to you:

> > > sahajamatch

> > > -----------------------

> > > Dear Sahaja Yogi's and Yogini's

> > >

> > > If you are a Sahaja Yogi of marriageable age, and

> > > were wanting to

> > > explore options to marry another Sahaja Yogi, but

> > > were not able to do

> > > so for various reasons, here is YOUR platform, where

> > > you exercise

> > > YOUR

> > > RIGHT to be YOUR OWN GURU.

> > >

> > > Here you may post your matrimonial profile, and view

> > > other sahaja

> > > yogi's profiles, communicate, and make your own

> > > decision if you would

> > > want to marry that person. Yes! Let us be as own own

> > > masters and be

> > > able to talk to each other.

> > >

> > > I am waiting for your suggestions. Remember, this

> > > forum is created

> > > for you and you are welcome to air your views.

> > > Ofcourse with each

> > > right there is a responsiblity. Lets keep this forum

> > > an honest,

> > > decent & friendly one.

> > >

> > > God bless you all, JSM.

> > > Love....Prerna.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Music Unlimited

> > Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.

> > http://music./unlimited/

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >