Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Hebrew word used in the Scriptures to denote spirit is Ruach, a feminine noun.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

" The Hebrew word used to denominate God in Genesis is Elohim. This

word is plural from the feminine singular ALH (Eloh) by adding IM to

it. Since IM is the termination of the masculine plural, added to a

feminine noun it makes ELOHIM a female potency united to a male

principle, and thus capable of having an offspring. The same intended

misconception is given in the Christian idea of the Holy Trinity:

Father, Son and the Holy Ghost. In the Kabbalah the Deity manifests

simultaneously as Mother and Father and thus begets the Son. We are

told that the Holy Spirit is essentially masculine, but the Hebrew

word used in the Scriptures to denote spirit is Ruach, a feminine

noun. The Holy Spirit is really the Mother, and thus the Christian

Trinity properly translated should be Father, Son and Mother. (Migene

Gonzalez-Wippler, A Kabbalah For The Modern World.) "            

 

Peter Occhiogrosso, The Joy of Sects, Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing

Group, Inc., 1996 p. 243.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Jagbir and All,

 

Thanks Jagbir for this information which i will use on the Holy

Spirit/Shekinah website.

 

i have watched Part I of a two part series, the second part which i

also intend to watch on the ABC on " Compass " . The " Compass " topic is

called " Who wrote the Bible? " . Some very surprising (or not so

surprising information, whichever way you look at it) has come up.

 

Dr. Robert Beckford is a genuine Christian and a theologian from

Birmingham in England who as a theologian discovered that what he was

taught in his childhood...namely, that God wrote the Bible, is too

simplistic an answer.

 

So, he goes on a journey from Jerusalem to Rome and traces the

footsteps of who has written the Bible.

 

Through his journey of discovering and the interviewing of numerous

people, much to his shock and contrary to his being taught all along

that it was Moses who wrote the first five books of the Bible, also

called the Pentatech (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and

Deuteronomy)....he finds that in actual fact there are four different

literary sources that underlie the Pentateuch.

 

He comes to the understanding, that obviously Moses can't have written

the first five Books of the Bible, and that believers have been

hoodwinked for centuries!

 

However, he finds that it is true, that THERE ARE FOUR original

sources of the text and each of them has its own distinctive style and

agenda.

 

According to Dr. Beckford, academics give each of the four versions a

letter. Below is how they differentiate the different sources:-

 

" J " ( " J " Source is for Jahweh, because God is called the " Jahweh " )

 

" E " ( " E " Source calls God Elohim)

 

" P " ( " P " Source is the Priestly source)

 

" D " ( " D " Source is named after the Book of Deuteronomy)

 

i have videotaped the program and i have transcribed the information,

more of which i intend to share, so that we can all have a better

understanding of this topic, which is very interesting.

 

warmest regards,

 

violet

 

 

, " jagbir singh "

<adishakti_org wrote:

>

>

> " The Hebrew word used to denominate God in Genesis is Elohim. This

> word is plural from the feminine singular ALH (Eloh) by adding IM to

> it. Since IM is the termination of the masculine plural, added to a

> feminine noun it makes ELOHIM a female potency united to a male

> principle, and thus capable of having an offspring. The same

intended

> misconception is given in the Christian idea of the Holy Trinity:

> Father, Son and the Holy Ghost. In the Kabbalah the Deity manifests

> simultaneously as Mother and Father and thus begets the Son. We are

> told that the Holy Spirit is essentially masculine, but the Hebrew

> word used in the Scriptures to denote spirit is Ruach, a feminine

> noun. The Holy Spirit is really the Mother, and thus the Christian

> Trinity properly translated should be Father, Son and Mother.

(Migene

> Gonzalez-Wippler, A Kabbalah For The Modern World.) "            

>

> Peter Occhiogrosso, The Joy of Sects, Bantam Doubleday Dell

Publishing

> Group, Inc., 1996 p. 243.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Violet and All,

 

We can use such information across the websites i.e., they can help

synthesize the religious traditions and make future visitors

comfortable with teachings 'alien' to their upbringing. Always keep

in mind that time is on our side in all its aspects. You must be

able to see the positive impact modern technologies and relentless

globalization is having on human consciousness, opening them to

information that was not available just a decade or two earlier. The

steady demise of the religious regimes will only accelerate this

process of collective consciousness, especially on the younger

generation. Do not look towards changing those with past religious

conditionings. It is the future generation that matters most as they

will more readily accept what we are saying today.

 

So it is imperative that we build sites with good content that do

just that. Just a single well-presented and informative page

titled " Hebrew word used in the Scriptures to denote spirit is

Ruach, a feminine noun " will go a much further distance because it

is supported by other traditions as well. i hope others can see the

future potential of concentrating on the collective Truth that

penetrates through the thick protective walls of religious regimes.

 

Happy Easter to all,

 

jagbir

 

 

, " Violet "

<violet.tubb wrote:

>

> Dear Jagbir and All,

>

> Thanks Jagbir for this information which i will use on the Holy

> Spirit/Shekinah website.

>

> i have watched Part I of a two part series, the second part which

i

> also intend to watch on the ABC on " Compass " . The " Compass " topic

is

> called " Who wrote the Bible? " . Some very surprising (or not so

> surprising information, whichever way you look at it) has come up.

>

> Dr. Robert Beckford is a genuine Christian and a theologian from

> Birmingham in England who as a theologian discovered that what he

was

> taught in his childhood...namely, that God wrote the Bible, is too

> simplistic an answer.

>

> So, he goes on a journey from Jerusalem to Rome and traces the

> footsteps of who has written the Bible.

>

> Through his journey of discovering and the interviewing of

numerous

> people, much to his shock and contrary to his being taught all

along

> that it was Moses who wrote the first five books of the Bible,

also

> called the Pentatech (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and

> Deuteronomy)....he finds that in actual fact there are four

different

> literary sources that underlie the Pentateuch.

>

> He comes to the understanding, that obviously Moses can't have

written

> the first five Books of the Bible, and that believers have been

> hoodwinked for centuries!

>

> However, he finds that it is true, that THERE ARE FOUR original

> sources of the text and each of them has its own distinctive style

and

> agenda.

>

> According to Dr. Beckford, academics give each of the four

versions a

> letter. Below is how they differentiate the different sources:-

>

> " J " ( " J " Source is for Jahweh, because God is called the " Jahweh " )

>

> " E " ( " E " Source calls God Elohim)

>

> " P " ( " P " Source is the Priestly source)

>

> " D " ( " D " Source is named after the Book of Deuteronomy)

>

> i have videotaped the program and i have transcribed the

information,

> more of which i intend to share, so that we can all have a better

> understanding of this topic, which is very interesting.

>

> warmest regards,

>

> violet

>

>

> , " jagbir singh "

> <adishakti_org@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > " The Hebrew word used to denominate God in Genesis is Elohim.

This

> > word is plural from the feminine singular ALH (Eloh) by adding

IM to

> > it. Since IM is the termination of the masculine plural, added

to a

> > feminine noun it makes ELOHIM a female potency united to a male

> > principle, and thus capable of having an offspring. The same

> intended

> > misconception is given in the Christian idea of the Holy

Trinity:

> > Father, Son and the Holy Ghost. In the Kabbalah the Deity

manifests

> > simultaneously as Mother and Father and thus begets the Son. We

are

> > told that the Holy Spirit is essentially masculine, but the

Hebrew

> > word used in the Scriptures to denote spirit is Ruach, a

feminine

> > noun. The Holy Spirit is really the Mother, and thus the

Christian

> > Trinity properly translated should be Father, Son and Mother.

> (Migene

> > Gonzalez-Wippler, A Kabbalah For The Modern World.) "            

> >

> > Peter Occhiogrosso, The Joy of Sects, Bantam Doubleday Dell

> Publishing

> > Group, Inc., 1996 p. 243.

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Jagbir and All,

 

You said:

 

" You must be able to see the positive impact modern technologies and relentless

globalization is having on human consciousness, opening them to information that

was not available just a decade or two earlier. "

 

i can see the positive impact that modern technologies and relentless

globalization is having on human consciousness, opening them to information that

was not available just a decade or two earlier!

 

There is nothing to fear by Christians and others, if they will realize, just as

Shri Mataji has said, that the Scriptures do point the way to Salvation/Second

Birth, but that the Scriptures have also been tampered with.

 

Dr. Robert Beckford is doing some of this work of revealing where the Scriptures

have been tampered with, or misconstrued, and so forth. i am very happy with

this, because i used to dream that someone would do this, because i too have

wanted to know who actually wrote the Bible, and i have wanted to know this for

my whole life.

 

Fundamentalistic Christians, however, do not like this work that Dr. Beckford is

doing, because they are afraid that their doctrines and dogmas will be ruined.

All i can say, is that Christian Fundamentalists have lost the 'fundamental' of

honest enquiry into things. They should actually be happy, that the Truth is

being revealed at this Time.

 

Above all things, Shri Mataji has said that we are to have an open mind. She has

also clearly stated that all the Original Teachings of the Divine Incarnations

such as Jesus, Buddha, Mohammed and others have been twisted, so that the

meaning of the Teachings have been misconstrued, thereby misinforming people.

 

All we have to do is look at the religious divisions, and this is direct

evidence of the effect that this tampering has had in people's lives, because

the people have been divided, when according to Shri Mataji, the teachings of

the Incarnations agree with each other, and that the True Teachings when

revealed, will again unite people of all spiritual traditions, classes,

cultures, and nations!

 

That is why it is of vital importance to discover where the 'tampering' has

taken place, and who is responsible, and why it was done, and so forth. That way

we can differentiate between the actual Incarnation's Teachings, and the

'would-be's'.

 

That is also why it behooves us not to gullibly accept every obscure and

relative truth that has been passed down to us from our religious and spiritual

traditions, because often these relative truths only sidetrack us from the

essential Truth itself, and this essential Truth is to GO WITHIN AND MEET THE

HOLY SPIRIT, OUR SPIRITUAL MOTHER, who in turn will teach us everything from

within!

 

We will actually know the Absolute Truth...by NOT READING ONLY, but actually

APPLYING the Teachings of Jesus and other Incarnations.

 

The Ultimate Truth that has been taught by Incarnations is that we must have our

Second Birth/Self-Realization/Kunalini Awakening/Enlightenment/Samadhi, etc.

(different terms for the same experience).

 

It has not been available before in an 'en masse' way. Jesus gave the Baptism of

the Spirit to His few Disciples, and that was all. Only a few received it.

 

Shri Mataji has said that She realized that in the past only ascetics and people

who performed austerities, could reach the purity and selflessness and spiritual

seeking that would MAYBE grant them their Second Birth, and that previously, it

was the most difficult thing to attain.....the Pearl of Greatest Price.......the

sacrifice for which was virtually unattainable, except when granted by an

Incarnation like Jesus, or when a person almost had to die to attain that.

 

Therefore the Advent of the Christian Comforter, the Advent of Shri Mataji

Nirmala Devi Herself, who is an Incarnation of the Holy Spirit.....has opened

the Kingdom of Heaven within the Primordial Spiritual Body, so that everyone who

wants.....can have their Second Birth of the Spirit...while still in their

physical bodies! This is EXACTLY as promised by Jesus, and His Promise is being

fulfilled TODAY!

 

They do not have to be completely ready for their Second Birth, inasmuch as they

do not have to be already pretty perfect human beings. They just need to desire

their Second Birth as the Spiritual Mother is HERE within us and Her

Representative is on Earth who has informed us about Her.

 

Happy Easter to everyone!

 

love and best wishes,

 

violet

 

 

, " jagbir singh "

<adishakti_org wrote:

>

> Dear Violet and All,

>

> We can use such information across the websites i.e., they can help

> synthesize the religious traditions and make future visitors

> comfortable with teachings 'alien' to their upbringing. Always keep

> in mind that time is on our side in all its aspects. You must be

> able to see the positive impact modern technologies and relentless

> globalization is having on human consciousness, opening them to

> information that was not available just a decade or two earlier. The

> steady demise of the religious regimes will only accelerate this

> process of collective consciousness, especially on the younger

> generation. Do not look towards changing those with past religious

> conditionings. It is the future generation that matters most as they

> will more readily accept what we are saying today.

>

> So it is imperative that we build sites with good content that do

> just that. Just a single well-presented and informative page

> titled " Hebrew word used in the Scriptures to denote spirit is

> Ruach, a feminine noun " will go a much further distance because it

> is supported by other traditions as well. i hope others can see the

> future potential of concentrating on the collective Truth that

> penetrates through the thick protective walls of religious regimes.

>

> Happy Easter to all,

>

> jagbir

>

>

> , " Violet "

> <violet.tubb@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Jagbir and All,

> >

> > Thanks Jagbir for this information which i will use on the Holy

> > Spirit/Shekinah website.

> >

> > i have watched Part I of a two part series, the second part which

> i

> > also intend to watch on the ABC on " Compass " . The " Compass " topic

> is

> > called " Who wrote the Bible? " . Some very surprising (or not so

> > surprising information, whichever way you look at it) has come up.

> >

> > Dr. Robert Beckford is a genuine Christian and a theologian from

> > Birmingham in England who as a theologian discovered that what he

> was

> > taught in his childhood...namely, that God wrote the Bible, is too

> > simplistic an answer.

> >

> > So, he goes on a journey from Jerusalem to Rome and traces the

> > footsteps of who has written the Bible.

> >

> > Through his journey of discovering and the interviewing of

> numerous

> > people, much to his shock and contrary to his being taught all

> along

> > that it was Moses who wrote the first five books of the Bible,

> also

> > called the Pentatech (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and

> > Deuteronomy)....he finds that in actual fact there are four

> different

> > literary sources that underlie the Pentateuch.

> >

> > He comes to the understanding, that obviously Moses can't have

> written

> > the first five Books of the Bible, and that believers have been

> > hoodwinked for centuries!

> >

> > However, he finds that it is true, that THERE ARE FOUR original

> > sources of the text and each of them has its own distinctive style

> and

> > agenda.

> >

> > According to Dr. Beckford, academics give each of the four

> versions a

> > letter. Below is how they differentiate the different sources:-

> >

> > " J " ( " J " Source is for Jahweh, because God is called the " Jahweh " )

> >

> > " E " ( " E " Source calls God Elohim)

> >

> > " P " ( " P " Source is the Priestly source)

> >

> > " D " ( " D " Source is named after the Book of Deuteronomy)

> >

> > i have videotaped the program and i have transcribed the

> information,

> > more of which i intend to share, so that we can all have a better

> > understanding of this topic, which is very interesting.

> >

> > warmest regards,

> >

> > violet

> >

> >

> > , " jagbir singh "

> > <adishakti_org@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > " The Hebrew word used to denominate God in Genesis is Elohim.

> This

> > > word is plural from the feminine singular ALH (Eloh) by adding

> IM to

> > > it. Since IM is the termination of the masculine plural, added

> to a

> > > feminine noun it makes ELOHIM a female potency united to a male

> > > principle, and thus capable of having an offspring. The same

> > intended

> > > misconception is given in the Christian idea of the Holy

> Trinity:

> > > Father, Son and the Holy Ghost. In the Kabbalah the Deity

> manifests

> > > simultaneously as Mother and Father and thus begets the Son. We

> are

> > > told that the Holy Spirit is essentially masculine, but the

> Hebrew

> > > word used in the Scriptures to denote spirit is Ruach, a

> feminine

> > > noun. The Holy Spirit is really the Mother, and thus the

> Christian

> > > Trinity properly translated should be Father, Son and Mother.

> > (Migene

> > > Gonzalez-Wippler, A Kabbalah For The Modern World.) "            

> > >

> > > Peter Occhiogrosso, The Joy of Sects, Bantam Doubleday Dell

> > Publishing

> > > Group, Inc., 1996 p. 243.

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...