Number of 'divine mothers' keep on rising. So which is the genuine one?

September 11, 2006

Dear All,

The number of 'divine mothers' just keep on rising. While searching

for unrelated information i came across another two sites:

Her Holiness Sai Maa Lakshmi Devi

http://www.humanityinunity.org/utility/showArticle/?objectID=1595

Divine Mother Sree Rama Devi

http://divinemother.rediffblogs.com/

So i just searched " divine mother' and this is what i found:

FATHER DIVINE, MOTHER DIVINE

http://fdipmm.libertynet.org/

Who is Ammachi?

http://www.divine-mother.org/

Sarada Devi

http://www.writespirit.net/authors/sarada-devi/

Sri Anandamayi Ma

http://www.writespirit.net/authors/sri_anandamayi_ma/

Meet Divine Mother

http://www.divinemother.net/

The Mother

http://www.writespirit.net/authors/the-mother/

Mother Meera

http://www.par.org.ar/Avatar/meera.html

Maa Kundalini

http://www.maakundalini.com/

Anandmurti GuruMaa

http://www.gurumaa.com/

Ma Jaya Sati Bhagavati

http://www.kashi.org/

Narayani Amma

http://www.narayaniamma.org/

Who is Baba?

http://www.saibaba-aclearview.com/contents2.html

This increase in 'divine mothers' will only confuse future seekers

as to who is the genuine divine mother, if at all. And both Narayani

Amma and Sai Baba males claim they are also the Divine Feminine.

However, one important fact has made these 'divine mothers' more

well-known and successful than the same claim made by SYs. Unlike

SYs, their devotees have always and openly proclaimed their revered

gurus during the 70s and 80s with the same faith and belief they had

in their hearts. Today these 'divine mothers' have far more devotees

and exposure than WCASY could ever dream of. Yet there is no sense

of duty, urgency and need for transparency amongst SYs. i believe it

has more to do with lack of direction, common sense and conscience

given the facts and progress of the other 'divine mothers'.

And when WCASY acts against those who want to proclaim Shri Mataji as

the Divine Mother, and ask Her devotees to help them, then only

fools will fail to understand the nature of the negativity that has

possessed them. Shri Mataji is the only divine mother whose devotees

are behaving this strange way. Is there any incarnation in history

who followers did not have the faith and conviction to stand on

their deepest beliefs?

To be fair, a few concerned souls like Alex did try to stir the

conscience of Sahaja Yogis in 1996 with this letter:

" It is astonishing that the sahaja yogis, who believe Shri Mataji to

be the savior of humanity prophecied by many religious scriptures,

have not the conviction to promote her to the world openly, honestly

and unashamedly as that. Promotion of the savior will draw more

serious attention from many more people than do the current vague

claims about stress relief and peace of mind. This lack of

conviction speaks volumes and is the same reason they fail to

respond to those who challenge SY. You simply can't be one thing and

then attempt to portray yourself as another - no matter how clever

you are, it shows and people see it very clearly. This is called

hypocrisy. It indicates the vast majority of sahaja yogis are in a

state of denial.

On the premise that Shri Mataji is indeed the Adi Shakti, on what

basis do the sahaja yogis take it upon themselves to discriminate as

to whom is delivered the message of her present incarnation and by

what convoluted process that message is selectively delivered? To

take upon themselves to make such discriminations is an expression

of an elitist, missionary culture motivated by power and authority

over others. The message must be very plain and simple if every

person on the planet is to be afforded the opportunity to draw their

own conclusions about the goddess incarnate. Why do the sahaja yogis

make something so simple so complicated?. Why are they doing so poor

a job in telling the world of Shri Mataji, when as the goddess she

will surely stand and be recognised as the reality they claim she is?

My parting word is that like it or not, Shri Mataji and her sahaja

yogis must face the issues presented by those who challenge them.

Intelligent response is required and what remains to be seen is

whether they are capable of this. The longer they avoid it, the more

SY will be clearly identified to be lacking in credibility and its

members in integrity. The more they will appear to be a cultish

throw-back to the dark ages. I recommend the sahaja yogis today

change their whole approach and start promoting SY as what it is - a

religion focused around a personality who has claimed, and is

understood by them, to be the Adi Shakti, divine mother of the

universe. This is, after all, the year of exposure for SY.

May truth prevail. "

So others did try to stir the conscience of SYs. But till today the

vast majority of SYs are deaf to such impassioned pleas. On the

contrary, those few who bring forth this " we must be truthful " topic

are shunned and viewed with suspicion as elements that are non-

collective .......... even non-SYs. So what is the nature of the

negativity that keeps so many 'self-realized' SY souls silent and

unable to lift a finger to support the Dharma and Truth?

jagbir

September 11, 2006

NEW DELHI, Sep 8 2006 (IANS): The Supreme Court Friday dismissed a

petition filed by a former police officer, who claims to be the

manifestation of Hindu goddess Radha, against an Allahabad High Court

order directing him to pay Rs.6,700 per month as maintenance to his

wife.

A bench of judges B.N. Agrawal and P.P. Naolekar declined to

entertain the petition after hearing counsel M. N. Krishnamani

appearing for petitioner Devendra Kishore Panda, who resigned as

Inspector General of Police, Uttar Pradesh, and calls

himself " Doosri Radha " .

Counsel contended that the high court had proceeded on the wrong

premise that he was getting Rs 20,000 a month as pension though he

was getting only Rs 12,800. He said Panda was prepared to pay one-

third of the pension as maintenance to his wife and a lumpsum amount

as one time full and final settlement.

The Bench noted that since it was only an interim order, the

petitioner should go back to the high court for relief.

Panda's petition seeking a divorce from his wife is already pending

in a trial court in Uttar Pradesh, where Panda was posted.

Another petition by his wife for restitution of conjugal rights is

also pending in the trial court. Panda had resigned following

complaints that he was dressing up like Radha. He had claimed that he

was doing so under instructions from Lord Krishna to live like Radha.

Panda was present in the court Friday. The bench, in a lighter vein,

asked him: " Are you Radha or Krishna today? " Counsel replied Panda

was only a follower of Krishna.

The bench, thereafter, rejected the petition at the admission stage.

SOURCE: Telugu Portal

URL: http://www.teluguportal.net/modules/news/article.php?

storyid=12886

, " jagbir singh "

<adishakti_org wrote:

>

> Dear All,

>

> The number of 'divine mothers' just keep on rising. While searching

> for unrelated information i came across another two sites:

>

> Her Holiness Sai Maa Lakshmi Devi

> http://www.humanityinunity.org/utility/showArticle/?objectID=1595

>

> Divine Mother Sree Rama Devi

> http://divinemother.rediffblogs.com/

>

> So i just searched " divine mother' and this is what i found:

>

> FATHER DIVINE, MOTHER DIVINE

> http://fdipmm.libertynet.org/

>

> Who is Ammachi?

> http://www.divine-mother.org/

>

> Sarada Devi

> http://www.writespirit.net/authors/sarada-devi/

>

> Sri Anandamayi Ma

> http://www.writespirit.net/authors/sri_anandamayi_ma/

>

> Meet Divine Mother

> http://www.divinemother.net/

>

> The Mother

> http://www.writespirit.net/authors/the-mother/

>

> Mother Meera

> http://www.par.org.ar/Avatar/meera.html

>

> Maa Kundalini

> http://www.maakundalini.com/

>

> Anandmurti GuruMaa

> http://www.gurumaa.com/

>

> Ma Jaya Sati Bhagavati

> http://www.kashi.org/

>

> Narayani Amma

> http://www.narayaniamma.org/

>

> Who is Baba?

> http://www.saibaba-aclearview.com/contents2.html

>

> This increase in 'divine mothers' will only confuse future seekers

> as to who is the genuine divine mother, if at all. And both

> Narayani Amma and Sai Baba males claim they are also the Divine

> Feminine.

>

> However, one important fact has made these 'divine mothers' more

> well-known and successful than the same claim made by SYs. Unlike

> SYs, their devotees have always and openly proclaimed their revered

> gurus during the 70s and 80s with the same faith and belief they

> had in their hearts. Today these 'divine mothers' have far more

> devotees and exposure than WCASY could ever dream of. Yet there is

> no sense of duty, urgency and need for transparency amongst SYs. i

> believe it has more to do with lack of direction, common sense and

> conscience given the facts and progress of the other 'divine

> mothers'.

>

> And when WCASY acts against those who want to proclaim Shri Mataji

> as the Divine Mother, and ask Her devotees to help them, then only

> fools will fail to understand the nature of the negativity that has

> possessed them. Shri Mataji is the only divine mother whose

> devotees are behaving this strange way. Is there any incarnation

> in history who followers did not have the faith and conviction to

> stand on their deepest beliefs?

>

> To be fair, a few concerned souls like Alex did try to stir the

> conscience of Sahaja Yogis in 1996 with this letter:

>

> " It is astonishing that the sahaja yogis, who believe Shri Mataji

> to be the savior of humanity prophecied by many religious

> scriptures, have not the conviction to promote her to the world

> openly, honestly and unashamedly as that. Promotion of the savior

> will draw more serious attention from many more people than do the

> current vague claims about stress relief and peace of mind. This

> lack of conviction speaks volumes and is the same reason they fail

> to respond to those who challenge SY. You simply can't be one

> thing and then attempt to portray yourself as another - no matter

> how clever you are, it shows and people see it very clearly. This

> is called hypocrisy. It indicates the vast majority of sahaja

> yogis are in a state of denial.

>

> On the premise that Shri Mataji is indeed the Adi Shakti, on what

> basis do the sahaja yogis take it upon themselves to discriminate

> as to whom is delivered the message of her present incarnation and

> by what convoluted process that message is selectively delivered?

> To take upon themselves to make such discriminations is an

> expression of an elitist, missionary culture motivated by power

> and authority over others. The message must be very plain and

> simple if every person on the planet is to be afforded the

> opportunity to draw their own conclusions about the goddess

> incarnate. Why do the sahaja yogis make something so simple so

> complicated?. Why are they doing so poor a job in telling the

> world of Shri Mataji, when as the goddess she will surely stand

> and be recognised as the reality they claim she is?

>

> My parting word is that like it or not, Shri Mataji and her sahaja

> yogis must face the issues presented by those who challenge them.

> Intelligent response is required and what remains to be seen is

> whether they are capable of this. The longer they avoid it, the

> more SY will be clearly identified to be lacking in credibility

> and its members in integrity. The more they will appear to be a

> cultish throw-back to the dark ages. I recommend the sahaja yogis

> today change their whole approach and start promoting SY as what

> it is - a religion focused around a personality who has claimed,

> and is understood by them, to be the Adi Shakti, divine mother of

> the universe. This is, after all, the year of exposure for SY.

>

> May truth prevail. "

>

> So others did try to stir the conscience of SYs. But till today the

> vast majority of SYs are deaf to such impassioned pleas. On the

> contrary, those few who bring forth this " we must be truthful "

> topic are shunned and viewed with suspicion as elements that are

> non-collective .......... even non-SYs. So what is the nature of

> the negativity that keeps so many 'self-realized' SY souls silent

> and unable to lift a finger to support the Dharma and Truth?

>

> jagbir

>

September 13, 2006

Jagbir, Do you think that it is because there are so many others proclaiming to be the Divine Mother and crackpots like Mr. Radha below that makes SYs shy to proclaim who Shri Mataji is? After all when one feels the truth, people will know who Shri Mataji is. Suzyjagbir singh <adishakti_org wrote: NEW DELHI, Sep 8 2006 (IANS): The Supreme Court Friday dismissed apetition filed by a former police officer, who claims to be

themanifestation of Hindu goddess Radha, against an Allahabad High Courtorder directing him to pay Rs.6,700 per month as maintenance to his wife.A bench of judges B.N. Agrawal and P.P. Naolekar declined to entertain the petition after hearing counsel M. N. Krishnamani appearing for petitioner Devendra Kishore Panda, who resigned as Inspector General of Police, Uttar Pradesh, and calls himself "Doosri Radha".Counsel contended that the high court had proceeded on the wrongpremise that he was getting Rs 20,000 a month as pension though he was getting only Rs 12,800. He said Panda was prepared to pay one-third of the pension as maintenance to his wife and a lumpsum amount as one time full and final settlement.The Bench noted that since it was only an interim order, thepetitioner should go back to the high court for relief.Panda's petition seeking a divorce from his wife is already pending in a

trial court in Uttar Pradesh, where Panda was posted.Another petition by his wife for restitution of conjugal rights isalso pending in the trial court. Panda had resigned followingcomplaints that he was dressing up like Radha. He had claimed that hewas doing so under instructions from Lord Krishna to live like Radha.Panda was present in the court Friday. The bench, in a lighter vein,asked him: "Are you Radha or Krishna today?" Counsel replied Panda was only a follower of Krishna.The bench, thereafter, rejected the petition at the admission stage.SOURCE: Telugu PortalURL: http://www.teluguportal.net/modules/news/article.php?storyid=12886--- In , "jagbir singh" <adishakti_org wrote:>>

Dear All,> > The number of 'divine mothers' just keep on rising. While searching> for unrelated information i came across another two sites:> > Her Holiness Sai Maa Lakshmi Devi> http://www.humanityinunity.org/utility/showArticle/?objectID=1595> > Divine Mother Sree Rama Devi> http://divinemother.rediffblogs.com/> > > So i just searched "divine mother' and this is what i found:> > FATHER DIVINE, MOTHER DIVINE> http://fdipmm.libertynet.org/> > Who is Ammachi?> http://www.divine-mother.org/> > Sarada Devi> http://www.writespirit.net/authors/sarada-devi/> > Sri Anandamayi Ma> http://www.writespirit.net/authors/sri_anandamayi_ma/> > Meet Divine Mother> http://www.divinemother.net/> > The Mother> http://www.writespirit.net/authors/the-mother/> > Mother Meera> http://www.par.org.ar/Avatar/meera.html> > Maa Kundalini> http://www.maakundalini.com/> > Anandmurti GuruMaa> http://www.gurumaa.com/> > Ma Jaya Sati

Bhagavati> http://www.kashi.org/> > Narayani Amma> http://www.narayaniamma.org/> > Who is Baba?> http://www.saibaba-aclearview.com/contents2.html> > This increase in 'divine mothers' will only confuse future seekers> as to who is the genuine divine mother, if at all. And both > Narayani Amma and Sai Baba males claim they are also the Divine > Feminine.> > However, one important fact has made these 'divine mothers' more> well-known and successful than the same claim made by SYs. Unlike> SYs, their devotees have always and openly proclaimed their revered> gurus during the 70s and 80s with the same faith and belief they > had in their hearts. Today these 'divine mothers' have far more

> devotees and exposure than WCASY could ever dream of. Yet there is > no sense of duty, urgency and need for transparency amongst SYs. i > believe it has more to do with lack of direction, common sense and > conscience given the facts and progress of the other 'divine > mothers'.> > And when WCASY acts against those who want to proclaim Shri Mataji > as the Divine Mother, and ask Her devotees to help them, then only> fools will fail to understand the nature of the negativity that has> possessed them. Shri Mataji is the only divine mother whose > devotees are behaving this strange way. Is there any incarnation > in history who followers did not have the faith and conviction to > stand on their deepest beliefs?> > To be fair, a few concerned souls like Alex did try to stir the> conscience of Sahaja Yogis in 1996 with this letter:> > "It is

astonishing that the sahaja yogis, who believe Shri Mataji > to be the savior of humanity prophecied by many religious > scriptures, have not the conviction to promote her to the world > openly, honestly and unashamedly as that. Promotion of the savior > will draw more serious attention from many more people than do the > current vague claims about stress relief and peace of mind. This > lack of conviction speaks volumes and is the same reason they fail > to respond to those who challenge SY. You simply can't be one > thing and then attempt to portray yourself as another - no matter > how clever you are, it shows and people see it very clearly. This > is called hypocrisy. It indicates the vast majority of sahaja > yogis are in a state of denial.> > On the premise that Shri Mataji is indeed the Adi Shakti, on what> basis do the sahaja yogis take it upon themselves to

discriminate > as to whom is delivered the message of her present incarnation and > by what convoluted process that message is selectively delivered? > To take upon themselves to make such discriminations is an > expression of an elitist, missionary culture motivated by power > and authority over others. The message must be very plain and > simple if every person on the planet is to be afforded the > opportunity to draw their own conclusions about the goddess > incarnate. Why do the sahaja yogis make something so simple so > complicated?. Why are they doing so poor a job in telling the > world of Shri Mataji, when as the goddess she will surely stand > and be recognised as the reality they claim she is?> > My parting word is that like it or not, Shri Mataji and her sahaja> yogis must face the issues presented by those who challenge them.> Intelligent response is

required and what remains to be seen is> whether they are capable of this. The longer they avoid it, the > more SY will be clearly identified to be lacking in credibility > and its members in integrity. The more they will appear to be a > cultish throw-back to the dark ages. I recommend the sahaja yogis > today change their whole approach and start promoting SY as what > it is - a religion focused around a personality who has claimed, > and is understood by them, to be the Adi Shakti, divine mother of > the universe. This is, after all, the year of exposure for SY.> > May truth prevail."> > > So others did try to stir the conscience of SYs. But till today the> vast majority of SYs are deaf to such impassioned pleas. On the> contrary, those few who bring forth this "we must be truthful" > topic are shunned and viewed with suspicion as elements that are >

non-collective .......... even non-SYs. So what is the nature of > the negativity that keeps so many 'self-realized' SY souls silent > and unable to lift a finger to support the Dharma and Truth?> > jagbir>

All-new Mail - Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.

September 15, 2006

, Suzy Creamcheese

<suzyogi wrote:

>

> Jagbir,

>

> Do you think that it is because there are so many others

> proclaiming to be the Divine Mother and crackpots like Mr. Radha

> below that makes SYs shy to proclaim who Shri Mataji is? After

> all when one feels the truth, people will know who Shri Mataji is.

>

> Suzy

>

No! SYs just are afraid that they will be ridiculed for making such

a statement. Over the years leaders have ingrained this ultra-

cautious approach into the collective psyche, applying the soothing

balm of " just give self-realization " to dull their conscience. That

is why SYs react and regard as negative anyone who does not stand

up, salute and sing along at their subtle system flag-raising

ceremonies. These rebels with a conscience have now no place amongst

the Sahaj Sangha ................... and i am happy to oblige them.

i believe Suzy you are talking about vibrations (cool breeze) when

you say that " when one feels the truth, people will know who Shri

Mataji is " . This is a collective belief that has hardly worked. SY

leaders never had the common sense, knowledge and faith to relate

and quote the holy scriptures as to the real reason one feels the

vibrations. That would mean telling seekers that Shri Mataji is the

Holy Spirit, and that it is the Age of the Resurrection and Last

Judgment. For our former leaders and present WCASY cabal it's a

daunting task that required in-depth knowledge and, more important,

evidence as to Shri Mataji's claims. Till today they have neither.

So this " when one feels the truth, people will know who Shri Mataji

is " speculative hope is no different from the dismal results of

" just give self-realization " . This colossal collective failure has

nothing to do with Shri Mataji. You cannot blame Her if SYs just

want to only proclaim the first " Subtle System " chapter as they are

afraid the remaining 107 chapters will subject them to ridicule

without in-depth knowledge and proof of Shri Mataji's claims.

Unlike the devotees of other gurus, standing on Truth and upholding

the Dharma is not a virtue for SYs and WCASY. They will pay dearly

for this dereliction of sacred duty, in case they still believe in

hype and have con-vinced themselves that the Divine is aiding them

in making progress in emancipating humanity. Only the blind, foolish

or ignorant to this collective lie and self-hypnosis.

As WCASY dither and twiddle their thumbs the number of 'divine

mothers' and their devotees only increase. That will only make the

task of proclaiming the advent of Shri Mataji all the more

daunting, in case SYs and WCASY members have yet to realize that

Shri Mataji is 83-years old and has withdrawn completely. (i doubt

they have realized the reasons and implications of Her Silence.)

Thus, when for decades SYs never had the guts to declare Her as the

Divine Mother when She was in Her element and leading the charge,

what hope can any SY harbour of any fleeing foot-soldiers and their

generals turing around as She prepares for Mahasamadhi and departure

from Earth? In the end you will only hear wails and gloom from them.

But all is going well. It is just a matter of time. So be patient

and Silent. And never empower those who do not uphold the Dharma!

jagbir

September 24, 2006

" The Mother:

Mirra Alfassa, later Morisset and Richard (February 21, 1878 -

November 17, 1973) but better known as The Mother, was the spiritual

partner of Sri Aurobindo. She was born in Paris to Turkish and

Egyptian parents and came to his ashram on March 29, 1914 visiting

Pondicherry several times and finally settling there in 1920. After

November 24, 1926, when Sri Aurobindo retired into seclusion, she

supervised the organization of his ashram and institutes. She became

the leader of the community after Sri Aurobindo's death in 1950. She

died in 1973....

In December of that year, Sri Aurobindo decided to withdraw from

public view. It was at this point that he identified Mirra with the

Divine Mother, and instructed his followers to do the same. He

informed his disciples that henceforth The Mother would take full

charge of the ashram and he would live in retirement. Mirra heard

for the first time that this new responsibility was conferred on her

and she had been installed officially as The Mother. She related

later that Sri Aurobindo had not consulted her prior to the

declaration nor did he inform her of his intention, but that she had

heard the news for the first time along with the disciples

(Karmayogi no date).

Sri Aurobindo considered that Mirra was an avatar (incarnation) of

the supreme shakti. In 1927 he wrote:

The One whom we adore as the Mother is the divine Conscious Force

that dominates all existence, one and yet many-sided that to follow

her movement is impossible even for the quickest mind and for the

freest and most vast intelligence.

The Mother p.19.

Sri Aurobindo's letters and instructions to his disciples taught the

path of spiritual surrender through devotion to The Mother; a form

of Bhakti Yoga. "

http://www.answers.com/topic/the-mother

, " jagbir singh "

<adishakti_org wrote:

>

> NEW DELHI, Sep 8 2006 (IANS): The Supreme Court Friday dismissed a

> petition filed by a former police officer, who claims to be the

> manifestation of Hindu goddess Radha, against an Allahabad High

> Court order directing him to pay Rs.6,700 per month as maintenance

> to his wife.

>

> A bench of judges B.N. Agrawal and P.P. Naolekar declined to

> entertain the petition after hearing counsel M. N. Krishnamani

> appearing for petitioner Devendra Kishore Panda, who resigned as

> Inspector General of Police, Uttar Pradesh, and calls

> himself " Doosri Radha " .

>

> Counsel contended that the high court had proceeded on the wrong

> premise that he was getting Rs 20,000 a month as pension though he

> was getting only Rs 12,800. He said Panda was prepared to pay one-

> third of the pension as maintenance to his wife and a lumpsum

> amount as one time full and final settlement.

>

> The Bench noted that since it was only an interim order, the

> petitioner should go back to the high court for relief.

>

> Panda's petition seeking a divorce from his wife is already

> pending in a trial court in Uttar Pradesh, where Panda was posted.

>

> Another petition by his wife for restitution of conjugal rights is

> also pending in the trial court. Panda had resigned following

> complaints that he was dressing up like Radha. He had claimed that

> he was doing so under instructions from Lord Krishna to live like

> Radha.

>

> Panda was present in the court Friday. The bench, in a lighter

> vein, asked him: " Are you Radha or Krishna today? " Counsel replied

> Panda was only a follower of Krishna.

>

> The bench, thereafter, rejected the petition at the admission

> stage.

>

> SOURCE: Telugu Portal

> URL: http://www.teluguportal.net/modules/news/article.php?

> storyid=12886

>

> , " jagbir singh "

> <adishakti_org@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear All,

> >

> > The number of 'divine mothers' just keep on rising. While

> > searching for unrelated information i came across another two

> > sites:

> >

> > Her Holiness Sai Maa Lakshmi Devi

> > http://www.humanityinunity.org/utility/showArticle/?objectID=1595

> >

> > Divine Mother Sree Rama Devi

> > http://divinemother.rediffblogs.com/

> >

> > So i just searched " divine mother' and this is what i found:

> >

> > FATHER DIVINE, MOTHER DIVINE

> > http://fdipmm.libertynet.org/

> >

> > Who is Ammachi?

> > http://www.divine-mother.org/

> >

> > Sarada Devi

> > http://www.writespirit.net/authors/sarada-devi/

> >

> > Sri Anandamayi Ma

> > http://www.writespirit.net/authors/sri_anandamayi_ma/

> >

> > Meet Divine Mother

> > http://www.divinemother.net/

> >

> > The Mother

> > http://www.writespirit.net/authors/the-mother/

> >

> > Mother Meera

> > http://www.par.org.ar/Avatar/meera.html

> >

> > Maa Kundalini

> > http://www.maakundalini.com/

> >

> > Anandmurti GuruMaa

> > http://www.gurumaa.com/

> >

> > Ma Jaya Sati Bhagavati

> > http://www.kashi.org/

> >

> > Narayani Amma

> > http://www.narayaniamma.org/

> >

> > Who is Baba?

> > http://www.saibaba-aclearview.com/contents2.html

> >

> > This increase in 'divine mothers' will only confuse future

> > seekers as to who is the genuine divine mother, if at all. And

> > both Narayani Amma and Sai Baba males claim they are also the

> > Divine Feminine.

> >

> > However, one important fact has made these 'divine mothers' more

> > well-known and successful than the same claim made by SYs. Unlike

> > SYs, their devotees have always and openly proclaimed their

> > revered gurus during the 70s and 80s with the same faith and

> > belief they had in their hearts. Today these 'divine mothers'

> > have far more devotees and exposure than WCASY could ever dream

> > of. Yet there is no sense of duty, urgency and need for

> > transparency amongst SYs. i believe it has more to do with lack

> > of direction, common sense and conscience given the facts and

> > progress of the other 'divine mothers'.

> >

> > And when WCASY acts against those who want to proclaim Shri

> > Mataji as the Divine Mother, and ask Her devotees to help them,

> > then only fools will fail to understand the nature of the

> > negativity that has possessed them. Shri Mataji is the only

> > divine mother whose devotees are behaving this strange way. Is

> > there any incarnation in history who followers did not have the

> > faith and conviction to stand on their deepest beliefs?

> >

> > To be fair, a few concerned souls like Alex did try to stir the

> > conscience of Sahaja Yogis in 1996 with this letter:

> >

> > " It is astonishing that the sahaja yogis, who believe Shri

> > Mataji to be the savior of humanity prophecied by many

> > religious scriptures, have not the conviction to promote her to

> > the world openly, honestly and unashamedly as that. Promotion of

> > the savior will draw more serious attention from many more

> > people than do the current vague claims about stress relief and

> > peace of mind. This lack of conviction speaks volumes and is the

> > same reason they fail to respond to those who challenge SY. You

> > simply can't be one thing and then attempt to portray yourself

> > as another - no matter how clever you are, it shows and people

> > see it very clearly. This is called hypocrisy. It indicates the

> > vast majority of sahaja

> > yogis are in a state of denial.

> >

> > On the premise that Shri Mataji is indeed the Adi Shakti, on what

> > basis do the sahaja yogis take it upon themselves to

discriminate as to whom is delivered the message of her present

incarnation and by what convoluted process that message is

selectively delivered? To take upon themselves to make such

discriminations is an expression of an elitist, missionary culture

motivated by power and authority over others. The message must be

very plain and simple if every person on the planet is to be

afforded the opportunity to draw their own conclusions about the

goddess incarnate. Why do the sahaja yogis make something so simple

so complicated?. Why are they doing so poor a job in telling the

> > world of Shri Mataji, when as the goddess she will surely stand

> > and be recognised as the reality they claim she is?

> >

> > My parting word is that like it or not, Shri Mataji and her

sahaja yogis must face the issues presented by those who challenge

them. Intelligent response is required and what remains to be seen is

> > whether they are capable of this. The longer they avoid it, the

> > more SY will be clearly identified to be lacking in credibility

> > and its members in integrity. The more they will appear to be a

> > cultish throw-back to the dark ages. I recommend the sahaja

yogis today change their whole approach and start promoting SY as

what it is - a religion focused around a personality who has

claimed, and is understood by them, to be the Adi Shakti, divine

mother of the universe. This is, after all, the year of exposure for

SY.

> >

> > May truth prevail. "

> >

> > So others did try to stir the conscience of SYs. But till today

the vast majority of SYs are deaf to such impassioned pleas. On the

> > contrary, those few who bring forth this " we must be truthful "

> > topic are shunned and viewed with suspicion as elements that are

> > non-collective .......... even non-SYs. So what is the nature

of the negativity that keeps so many 'self-realized' SY souls silent

> > and unable to lift a finger to support the Dharma and Truth?

> >

> > jagbir

> >

>

November 8, 2006

Rajasthan Politician Worships Chief Minister as Durga

Sunday, November 05, 2006

JAIPUR (November 05, 2006): In a case of sycophancy scaling new

heights, a minister in the Rajasthan government worships Chief

Minister Vasundhara Raje as an equivalent of Hindu goddess Durga and

even performs daily rituals before her photograph:

Rajasthan Minister for Urban Development Pratap Sing Singhvi has a

photograph of " Goddess Vasundhara " at his official residence here

before which he offers regular prayers and also carries out daily

rituals like those offered to a Hindu deity.

He went to the extent of having Vasundhara's photograph done up to

resemble that of goddess Durga, with the chief minister sitting on a

tiger and her eight hands carrying different weapons. She is shown

wearing traditional attire and is decorated with heavy gold

jewellery.

The picture bears the words: " Maa teri surat se alag bhagwan ki

surat kya hogi " (Mother your face cannot be different from god).

Singhvi says in defence: " Yes, we worship Raje and offer prayers.

Prayers are offered everyday by one of the party men. I attend the

prayer whenever I get time. I think there is no harm in worshipping

Raje as she is a woman and women are worshipped in the Hindu

religion. So what is the problem? "

Singhvi's subordinates and the ruling Bharatiya Janata party men

even chant " Vasundhara Chalisa " everyday at the time of prayers.

" Vasundhara Chalisa " was prepared by a party worker. After offering

prayers, Singhvi or his subordinates distribute " prasad " to the

people present at his residence.

SOURCE: IANS/IndiaeNews.com

URL: http://www.indiaenews.com/politics/20061105/27612.htm