Christianiti is actually Krishna Neeti....

[Guest guest]

www.iidb.org/vbb/archive/index.php/t-72809.html

 

Christianity is in fact Krishna Neeti

 

aditya

January 5, 2004, 07:17 PM

The new book, titled as 'Jesus the Christ was a Hindu' published by Indian

Foundation for Vedic Science is the English translation of the original book

is authored by the late G.D. alias Babarao Savarkar, a great revolutionary,

who was the elder brother of Veer Savarkar. Babarao

Savarkar was sent to the famous Cellular Jail of the Andamans, for rigorous

imprisonment. In that horrible jail, he was imprisoned from 1910 to 1921.

When he was allowed to read the books available in that jail, Babarao

Savarkar

read many English books on the life of Jesus the Christ and was convinced

that

Jesus Christ was a Tamil Hindu. On release from the jail he wrote a book in

Marathi showing how Jesus Christ was a Hindu. The book was published in

1946; but

before the publication he had lost his life, on 16th March 1945. Dr. P. V.

Vartak

from Pune has translated this marvelous research book in lucid and easy

English.

 

Apparently, to say that Jesus was a Hindu, appears to be ridiculous, but on

reading this book everybody will be convinced that Jesus was a Hindu. He

was

the preacher of Vedic Dharma. Christianity did not denote the religion of

Jesus but it denoted the Krishna nity or Geeta, since Jesus was the

propagator of the theology of Geeta. So Jesus didn't start any new religion.

It was later after his death that Christianity was introduced as a new faith

other than the Vedic one. Deep research of Shri. Babarao Savarkar

presented in this book shows that Jesus was a Tamil Hindu.

Jesus Christ did not go himself to Palestine, but his ancestors migrated

there

long ago. Long before Ramayana, Yayati's sons Anu and Turvasu migrated

there,

from whom arose the Yavanas and Turuks. After the Mahabharata war

Yadavas

and

Abhiras migrated there from India. The word Yadava became 'Yada', while '

Abhira' became Habira and then Hibru. Their God Almighty was 'Jehova' the

Fire of yajna which is registered in the Rigveda 7-6-5, where is stated

" Jahvo Agnih " .

Aristotal was told by a Jew scholar that Jews were originally Indians. Many

western

scholars admit it. The name 'Aremaik' of Palestinian language has arisen

from a

Sanskrit word 'Arvam' denoting " Tamil " . It contains many Tamil words. When

crucified Jesus uttered, " Eloi, Eloi, Lama Sabacthani " . This is a Tamil

sentence, its original form being " Eloi, Eloi, Sabikka Lamada Ni " , which

means

" Oh God, why are you crushing or cursing me like this? "

Many ancient European portraits of Christ illustrated in this book show

Hindu signs on him like dark complexion, a sacred thread, hanging from his

left shoulder, a Dhoti around his waist, a Tilaka on forehead, a Mudra of

his fingers, a Danda in his hand and saffron robe. Those portraits are

painted by Christian European artists some 1500 years ago. Jesus was called

'Ben Pandera'. In Tamil 'Ben' means Child and 'Pandera' means Devotee. The

name Mary arose from Marium, which came from Tamil 'Mariamma'. Her

portraits

show Hindu signs on her body. Her pictures are also ancient, sketched

around

1500 years ago. Sister of Christ was named 'Thamar' which means Lotus in

Tamil, and it is a custom in India to keep name of a girl as lotus. Jesus

often told parables from 'Gheeda'. Gheeda is a corrupt form of 'Geeta'.

There was no such book as Gheeda around Palestine before Jesus. He told

stories of Jash. 'Jash' is a corrupt form of 'Vyasa'. [like Vyankappa =

Yankappa. Yajna = Jajna]. 'Jesus' is derived from Greek 'Jeshua', a

deviation of Keshua or Keshava. He was supposed to be incarnation of

Krishna. The term 'Krishna' corrupted into 'Krishta' and 'Christ'. Therefore

he was termed as 'Jesus the Christ', meaning Keshava the incarnation of

Krishna. Though a carpenter he is called 'Good Shepherd', in memory of

'Gopala' Krishna; because he was supposed to be an incarnation of Krishna.

There are many pictures of Jesus just like lord Krishna and his

incarnations. After his Thread ceremony at 12 years of age, he went to

India for studies and returned at 30. He wore a Philacteris made of Teckilim

or

Darbha. He emphasized a second birth (Dvija) for getting Heaven. This

'Dvija' is

the unique concept of Vedic people. Ample evidence has been showered in

the

book to prove that Christ was a Hindu. Savarkar has given evidence to show

connection of Jesus with the Nath cult of Indian Yogis. A Bengali poem sung

traditionally in Nath Cult is cited in the book, in which Jesus is mentioned

as 'Isha Nath', who had gone to Arab country, died there, but revived again.

In that poem Isha Nath is honoured as a Parama Guru.

Finally, Jesus came to India and died in Kashmir. There are three tombs in

Kashmir - of Jesus, of Marium and of John, the Guru of Jesus.

The whole book is fascinating and is full of strong evidences. Life sketch of

Jesus is presented in a respectful manner. The esteem about Jesus increases

on

reading this book. The original research of Savarkar is superb and the

translator has been quite successful in plucking out the actual significance

of the original Marathi book in English. If all the Christians read this

book, instead of trying to convert Hindus into Christian sect, they would

like to adopt their original Vedic Dharma. They would like to follow the

great theology of Geeta, preached by Jesus. I have a strong belief that on

reading this book the Hindus and Christians will develop brotherly and

peaceful relations.

If the Pope is lucky enough to this book, he would have to rethink over his

statement made by him during his visit to India in 1999. The Pope boasted

that in the first millennium Christians conquered the Europe, in the second

millennium Christians conquered America and Africa, and in the third

millennium Christians will conquer Asia. On that background Franchois

Gautier wrote an article in the Indian Express dated 25 Oct.1999, showing

how Hindu the Pope is.

A Russian oriental researcher Mr. Sergei Alexeyev in his talk on Moscow

radio said that Jesus Christ was a Hindu Sanyasin, an Indian Hermit. Jesus

made

an in depth study of Hindu texts during his visit to India. Christ toured to

Delhi, Jaipur, Varanasi, Rishikesh. ( Ref. The Times of India 1-7-99).

Dr. Notovitch had done a similar research in the past, studying for 25

years.

Dr. Notovitch traveled in India. At the Buddha temple in Himmus, Tibet, he

was

shown an ancient book, which records the reports of Christ in India for 17

years. It included one short book written by Christ himself. Dr. Notovitch

prepared three copies of that book and sent one to the Pope. However, the

Pope

burnt it and wrote him that he should not do such folly again. Even then,

Dr.Notovitch published the book under title " The Unknown Life of

Jesus " .------

premjan

January 6, 2004, 12:27 AM

you need to do a better job on your propaganda. beanpie of the sudroid

fantasies is currently doing better than this.

 

savarkar is not even a tamilian. how did he get these ideas? you have to

dismiss most of jewish self-history to accept this stuff.

 

that said, I think christian missionaries need to find something better to do

than to convert hindus.

 

I consider highly scripturalist religions like Islam, Christianity and Judaism

to

be " secondary " religions rather than primary religions, since the latter, like

Hinduism tend to focus much more directly on spirituality and much less on

the external forms and

beliefs.------

beanpie

January 6, 2004, 03:14 PM

ANACALYPSIS

 

 

 

Godfrey Higgins

 

 

 

1833

 

 

 

Volume I [867 pages]

Volume II [525 pages]

 

 

 

I think I could scarcely have wished for a more complete proof of the truth of

my doctrine of the renewal of the Avatars, than the above. It shews, in fact,

that

both Buddha and Cristna are nothing but renewed incarnations in each cycle.

 

Mons. De Guignes* states that Fo, or Buddha, was brought forth not from the

matrix, but from the right side, of a virgin, whom a ray of light had

impregnated. The Manich?ans held that this was the case with Jesus Christ,

and by this single fact, without the necessity for any others, they identify

themselves with the Buddhists. - * Hist. des Huns, Tome I. Part. ii. p.224.

 

Buddha as well as Cristna means shepherd. Thus, he was the good

shepherd. M. Guigniaut says, there is a third Guatama, the founder of the

philosophy Nyaya. I ask, may not this be the philosophy of a certain sect,

which in its ceremonies chaunts in honour of Crista the word IEYE, in fact, the

name of the Hebrew God Ieue, or Jehovah as we disguise it ?* We know that

names of persons in passing from one language into another, have often

been surprisingly changed or disguised; but there is no change here; it is the

identical name. - * See Maur. Hist. Hind. Vol. II p.339, ed. 4to.

 

Buddha may be seen in the India House with a glory round his head. This I

consider of great consequence. The glory round the head of Jesus Christ is

always descriptive of his character, as an incarnation of that Higher Power of

which the sun is himself the emblem, or the manifestation.

 

? But yet there is one circumstance of very great importance which is peculiar

to Buddha, and forms a discriminating mark between him and Cristna, which

is, that he is continually described as a Negro, not only with a black

complexion, in which he agrees with Cristna, but with woolly hair and flat face.

M. Creuzer observes, that the black Buddha, with frizzled or curled hair,

attaches himself at the same time to the three systems into which the religion

of India divides itself.

 

Buddha is stated by Sir W. Jones to be Woden, and not a native of India.* But

it is remarkable, that Woden is his Tamul name, and the Tamulese are now in

South India. This will be found of importance hereafter.

 

Previous to this, in the year 63 B.C., the city had been alarmed by a prophecy

of one Figulus, that a king or master of the Romans was about to be born, in

consequence of which the Senate passed a decree, that no father bring up a

male child born that year : but those among the Senators, whose wives were

pregnant, got the decree suppressed.* These prophecies were applied to

Augustus, who was born 63 years before Christ according to some persons,

but 56 according to several writers in the East, such as the author of the

Lebtarikh and others. " Hence it is, that Nicolo de Conti, who was in Bengal

and other parts of India in the fifteenth century, insists that the Vicramaditya

was the same as Augustus, and that his period was reckoned, from the birth of

that Emperor, fifty-six years before Christ. " Now, it is evident that these

fifty-six

years before Christ bring us to the ?ra of the Buddha of Siam, for the

beginning of the new ?ra, foretold by the Cum?an Sibyl, as declared by the

Mantuan or Celtic poet, the Druid of Cisalpine Gaul, in his fourth eclogue.**

This, in some old manuscripts seen by Pierius, is entitled Interpretatio Novi

S?culi.***

 

* See Sup. to Tit. Liv. CII. Decad. Cap. xxxix.

 

 

much more info may be found at,

http://members.tripod.com/~pc93/anacv1b5.htm---\

-----

-------------------------------