Deceitful Sahajist joins horny, porny Sfacets incivility at Wikipedia

[Guest guest]

User talk:Sahajhist

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

CheckUser evidence has confirmed that you have used multiple accounts

abusively, see user:WikiPossum and user:MonitorMan. I would warn you

that any repetition of this behaviour may lead to an immediate block

from further editing. Guy (Help!) 12:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

 

Sahajhist is my old ID. MonitorMan is my new ID. Sahajhist 13:15, 9

December 2007 (UTC)

I see you've blocked my new ID indefinately so its back to the old

one. Tiresome. Sahajhist 15:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

" Old ID " ? Monitorman began editing on November 19, 2007[1] (by

participating in a thread to which Sahajhist had already contributed

[2]). Since then " Sahajhist " has made 23 edits, not including

today's. Changing usernames is OK, using multiple ones at the same

time in the same articles is not.

 

Sahajhist 12:45, November 12, 2007 (hist) (diff) Sahaja Yoga (revert -

really Simon!)

58.109.99.153 14:39, November 12, 2007 (hist) (diff) Sahaja Yoga (rvt

(yawn))

WikiPossum 15:04, November 12, 2007 (hist) (diff) Sahaja Yoga (rvt -

no yawn)

Please remember that the rule is " one editor, one account " . Please

read and comply with WP:SOCK. Using multiple accounts to participate

in a mediation,[3], to make snide remarks,[4][5], to promote yourself

[6], or to disrupt an RfC[7] is just plain deceitful. ·:· Will Beback

·:· 20:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

 

you have been busy. Do you have a life in the real world? (still

posting as)Sahajhist 21:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

 

Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sahajhist "

 

 

Dear self-realized souls,

 

It looks like Sahajist (John Noyce) is as deceitful as Sfacets is

horny and porny. John Noyce has always used multiple IDs to mislead

others - ALWAYS! That is his deceitful way of " loading the dice " in

his favor. He has no qualms about being dishonest as it is not easy

to get caught on the Internet. But folks, he is against guys who are

internet savvy and have tools like CheckUser to nail cheats. And when

Will Beback nailed him John Noyce could only pathetically lash back.

 

i have claimed in previous posts that John Noyce uses multiple IDs to

deceive the unsuspecting. So i will be archiving this Wikipedia

article as evidence of what i have known for years.

 

This whole Sahajist and Sfacets Wikipedia adventure is turning out

into a fiasco. It is a shame that compared to deceitful Sahajist and

horny, porny Sfacets, ordinary folks like Will Beback are acting far

more honestly and morally. How come more than two decades of SY

meditation, footsoaking and treatments cannot rid WCASY approved John

Noyce of such negativity? And what can i say of Sfacets?

 

Just a few days ago on Dec. 5, 2007 John Noyce had the temerity (and

lack of both intelligence and judgment) to defend his horny, porny

pal Sfacets. He sent Violet an email:

 

>

> 2. If you look more carefully at sfacets' bittorrent

> upload page, you'll see that what Jagbir is objecting

> to in his usual colourful language are in fact

> adverts. These adverts have absolutely nothing to do

> with sfacets whatsoever. Check it for yourself. I'd

> say Jagbir needs to apologise for jumping to

> conclusions.

>

 

i waited for nearly a week to positively confirm John Noyce's lack of

both intelligence and judgment about his horny, porny friend Sfacets.

Instead of asking Sfacets to remove his links from the X-rated page

 

http://www.btmon.com/comment_author/sfacets

 

John Noyce is asking an apology from me???!!!! Both John Noyce and

Sfacets do not have the common sense and shame to do what any self-

realized soul would do - remove all links at that X-rated page. As

far as John Noyce is concerned " These adverts have absolutely nothing

to do with sfacets whatsoever. " In other words, those obscene, X-

rated images should in no way reflect on Sfacets or his state of self-

realization. Since that is the case John Noyce, how about advertising

Sahaja Yoga at bittorrent with a nice photo of Shri Mataji? i think

Sfacets has space for that on his page.

 

regards to all,

 

jagbir

 

 

 

>

> Sfacets pokes a spear into Christ's abdomen and taunts the

> Savior: " I am John Noyce's accomplice who also keeps deleting the

> links and am as active as the devil in preventing humanity from

> receiving your message of the Last Judgment. "

>

> Hope that makes your day Sfacets,

>

> jagbir

>

>

> Note: Sfacets, all these posts are being permanently archived at

> http://sahajayoga-shrimataji.org/ so that future generations will

> know exactly what transpired during the winter of Shri Mataji's

> life. As the designated night-soil carrier of Sahaja Yoga i would

> value your opinion and feedback if i am up to task.

>

 

And thanks Sfacets for behaving in an uncivilized manner at Wikipedia

which scores highly in my reports on Sahaj Love. So keep up the good

Sahaja Yoga work you are doing in public with John Noyce. Surely WCASY

will one day share Shri Mataji's Will with both of you .......... or

at least with John Noyce.

 

But it is your horny nature er, ............ i mean porny too, that

disturbs me Sfacets. i know you are a tetesterone-laden 24 year-old

roaming the Melbourne campus for relief, but why do you want us to

watch all these X-rated t*ts, pu**ies and ar**s with you?

 

http://www.btmon.com/comment_author/sfacets

 

Well, that is another feather in your illustrious cap John Noyce. So

when can we expect you and co-author Sfacets to publish " The Kama

Yoga of Sahaja Sutra " ?

 

jagbir

[Guest guest]

Dear Jagbir and self-realised Souls,

 

Incredible! And this is the very same deceit that is backed by WCASY. It is also

the very same deceit that has been used to prevent Sahaja Yogis in the

organisation, from giving Her Identity, Mission, and Message of the Last

Judgment and Resurrection to the world! Surely, they didn't think they had

immunity from exposure, just because they were very clever, not to mention,

deceitful with it!

 

As you have mentioned, Jagbir, we have known about the multiple I.D.'s of John

Noyce for some time now, but just could not prove it. But now, thanks to

Wikipedia, they have exposed this deception through the use of CheckUser, and i

agree that since this is the case, John Noyce is impudent to expect you to

apologize to him! i doubt that he will ever apologize to you though, because i

don't think he has that kind of a conscience. It seems he can do anything in the

'name of WCASY'! Still, i am speechless, that the whole organisation of Sahaja

Yoga has been 'so overcome' through the manipulation into positions of power, by

'administratively deceptive' people, claiming to be Sahaja Yogis - but their

heart is far from it!

 

Will the organisation ever recover from this deception? i don't know for sure.

Can integrity yet come out from the younger generation, in spite of this 'early

deception'? Hasn't everyone's hands already been 'thoroughly tied'? i remember a

Sahaja Yogini telling me that Shri Mataji told her in about the 80's, in

reference to administration, that: " they will tie everything up! "

 

So what's left now, that they have " tied everything up? " Where has the integrity

of the organisation gone? Of course, this is a shameful 'eyesore' in the

organisation, yet it is only by exposure that the pus in the wound can be healed

- except that we are talking about a spiritual organisation here! Every

organisation needs honesty, but a spiritual organisation has by its very nature,

to be based on honesty, on integrity! If a spiritual organisation is not based

on honesty, on integrity, what is left of its " spiritual " part?!

 

regards to all,

 

violet

 

 

-- In , " jagbir

singh " <adishakti_org wrote:

>

> User talk:Sahajhist

> From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

> Jump to: navigation, search

> CheckUser evidence has confirmed that you have used multiple

accounts

> abusively, see user:WikiPossum and user:MonitorMan. I would warn

you

> that any repetition of this behaviour may lead to an immediate

block

> from further editing. Guy (Help!) 12:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

>

> Sahajhist is my old ID. MonitorMan is my new ID. Sahajhist 13:15, 9

> December 2007 (UTC)

> I see you've blocked my new ID indefinately so its back to the old

> one. Tiresome. Sahajhist 15:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

> " Old ID " ? Monitorman began editing on November 19, 2007[1] (by

> participating in a thread to which Sahajhist had already

contributed

> [2]). Since then " Sahajhist " has made 23 edits, not including

> today's. Changing usernames is OK, using multiple ones at the same

> time in the same articles is not.

>

> Sahajhist 12:45, November 12, 2007 (hist) (diff) Sahaja Yoga

(revert -

> really Simon!)

> 58.109.99.153 14:39, November 12, 2007 (hist) (diff) Sahaja Yoga

(rvt

> (yawn))

> WikiPossum 15:04, November 12, 2007 (hist) (diff) Sahaja Yoga (rvt

-

> no yawn)

> Please remember that the rule is " one editor, one account " . Please

> read and comply with WP:SOCK. Using multiple accounts to

participate

> in a mediation,[3], to make snide remarks,[4][5], to promote

yourself

> [6], or to disrupt an RfC[7] is just plain deceitful. ·:· Will

Beback

> ·:· 20:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

>

> you have been busy. Do you have a life in the real world? (still

> posting as)Sahajhist 21:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

>

> Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sahajhist "

>

>

> Dear self-realized souls,

>

> It looks like Sahajist (John Noyce) is as deceitful as Sfacets is

> horny and porny. John Noyce has always used multiple IDs to mislead

> others - ALWAYS! That is his deceitful way of " loading the dice " in

> his favor. He has no qualms about being dishonest as it is not easy

> to get caught on the Internet. But folks, he is against guys who

are

> internet savvy and have tools like CheckUser to nail cheats. And

when

> Will Beback nailed him John Noyce could only pathetically lash

back.

>

> i have claimed in previous posts that John Noyce uses multiple IDs

to

> deceive the unsuspecting. So i will be archiving this Wikipedia

> article as evidence of what i have known for years.

>

> This whole Sahajist and Sfacets Wikipedia adventure is turning out

> into a fiasco. It is a shame that compared to deceitful Sahajist

and

> horny, porny Sfacets, ordinary folks like Will Beback are acting

far

> more honestly and morally. How come more than two decades of SY

> meditation, footsoaking and treatments cannot rid WCASY approved

John

> Noyce of such negativity? And what can i say of Sfacets?

>

> Just a few days ago on Dec. 5, 2007 John Noyce had the temerity

(and

> lack of both intelligence and judgment) to defend his horny, porny

> pal Sfacets. He sent Violet an email:

>

> >

> > 2. If you look more carefully at sfacets' bittorrent

> > upload page, you'll see that what Jagbir is objecting

> > to in his usual colourful language are in fact

> > adverts. These adverts have absolutely nothing to do

> > with sfacets whatsoever. Check it for yourself. I'd

> > say Jagbir needs to apologise for jumping to

> > conclusions.

> >

>

> i waited for nearly a week to positively confirm John Noyce's lack

of

> both intelligence and judgment about his horny, porny friend

Sfacets.

> Instead of asking Sfacets to remove his links from the X-rated page

>

> http://www.btmon.com/comment_author/sfacets

>

> John Noyce is asking an apology from me???!!!! Both John Noyce and

> Sfacets do not have the common sense and shame to do what any self-

> realized soul would do - remove all links at that X-rated page. As

> far as John Noyce is concerned " These adverts have absolutely

nothing

> to do with sfacets whatsoever. " In other words, those obscene, X-

> rated images should in no way reflect on Sfacets or his state of

self-

> realization. Since that is the case John Noyce, how about

advertising

> Sahaja Yoga at bittorrent with a nice photo of Shri Mataji? i think

> Sfacets has space for that on his page.

>

> regards to all,

>

> jagbir

>

>

>

> >

> > Sfacets pokes a spear into Christ's abdomen and taunts the

> > Savior: " I am John Noyce's accomplice who also keeps deleting the

> > links and am as active as the devil in preventing humanity from

> > receiving your message of the Last Judgment. "

> >

> > Hope that makes your day Sfacets,

> >

> > jagbir

> >

> >

> > Note: Sfacets, all these posts are being permanently archived at

> > http://sahajayoga-shrimataji.org/ so that future generations will

> > know exactly what transpired during the winter of Shri Mataji's

> > life. As the designated night-soil carrier of Sahaja Yoga i would

> > value your opinion and feedback if i am up to task.

> >

>

> And thanks Sfacets for behaving in an uncivilized manner at

Wikipedia

> which scores highly in my reports on Sahaj Love. So keep up the

good

> Sahaja Yoga work you are doing in public with John Noyce. Surely

WCASY

> will one day share Shri Mataji's Will with both of you ..........

or

> at least with John Noyce.

>

> But it is your horny nature er, ............ i mean porny too, that

> disturbs me Sfacets. i know you are a tetesterone-laden 24 year-old

> roaming the Melbourne campus for relief, but why do you want us to

> watch all these X-rated t*ts, pu**ies and ar**s with you?

>

> http://www.btmon.com/comment_author/sfacets

>

> Well, that is another feather in your illustrious cap John Noyce.

So

> when can we expect you and co-author Sfacets to publish " The Kama

> Yoga of Sahaja Sutra " ?

>

> jagbir

>