False advertisments or fake IDs confirm a deceitful collective mindset

[Guest guest]

Dear Violet and All,

 

i checked to follow up on John Noyce's Wikipedia deception and, to my

surprise, the thread has been deleted. i have thus realized that we

have been very lucky indeed to catch John Noyce red-handed. (i use

" we " because Violet was the one who first alerted me to John Noyce

and Sfacets editing out http://www.adishakti.org from Wikipedia.)

 

In the first place, you must join just as the comments are posted.

Then there is a narrow timeframe to copy them as John Noyce deletes

the incriminating evidence almost immediately. Indeed we have been so

fortunate to have nabbed him. Something just made me check Wikipedia

in the nick of time.

 

i have also found out something about Wikipedia's Checkuser:

 

" Checkuser

Wikipedia operates a process known as Checkuser to identify some sock

puppets in certain cases. Where it is unclear whether or not sock

puppetry is in progress, server log information can be consulted. To

comply with Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy, this is limited to a

handful of users with checkuser privilege and only done in serious

cases, with reasonable cause, to check if user A is the same as user

B based upon some evidence. "

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry

 

Having access to Checkuser is something like obtaining a search

warrant from a judge. You are only granted if solid evidence of

suspected criminal activity is presented. So in John Noyce's case it

was a slam dunk as Will Beback had a thick dossier on JN's past use of

multiple IDs, a fact that is well-known among those SYs unfortunate to

work with him. (Remember sahaja-yoga-response/

John Noyce?)

 

>

> Will the organisation ever recover from this deception? i don't

> know for sure. Can integrity yet come out from the younger

> generation, in spite of this 'early deception'? Hasn't everyone's

> hands already been 'thoroughly tied'? i remember a Sahaja Yogini

> telling me that Shri Mataji told her in about the 80's, in

> reference to administration, that: " they will tie everything up! "

>

 

Violet, all your fears will come true if you remain silent. But here

we are not only exposing the bare butts of these deceitful, WCASY-

approved candidates but spanking them sore too. However, it is the

evidence gathered and archived that will turn the tide in future. i

am very sure that Shri Mataji will triumph despite the John Noyces,

Alan Wherrys and Yogi Mahajans within the organization.

 

It is without question that the turning point and force will come

from outside the organization. One day we will all witness the birth

of an organization based on the true, transparent teachings and

Divine Message of Shri Mataji. So do not empower the present deceitful

SYSSR organization in any way. It will only delay the onset of the

Blossom Time that Shri Mataji has so tirelessly campaigned for more

than three decades. How much time does our 84-year-old Divine Mother

still have to see that Dawn of Truth?

 

>

> Shri Mataji said a couple of months ago that if SYM doesn't work in

> America then the whole world will be lost.

>

 

Not only will Sahaja Yoga Meditation not work in America, or anywhere

else for the matter, as long as we have deceitful people running the

organization. Whether it is the false advertisments of the present

Sahaja Yoga organization or the fake IDs of John Noyce, they confirm

a deceitful collective mindset.

 

Main Entry: de·ceit·ful

: having a tendency or disposition to deceive:

a: not honest <a deceitful child>

b: deceptive, misleading <deceitful advertising>

 

Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

 

regards to all,

 

jagbir

 

 

, " Violet "

<violet.tubb wrote:

>

> Dear Jagbir and self-realised Souls,

>

> Incredible! And this is the very same deceit that is backed by

WCASY. It is also the very same deceit that has been used to prevent

Sahaja Yogis in the organisation, from giving Her Identity, Mission,

and Message of the Last Judgment and Resurrection to the world!

Surely, they didn't think they had immunity from exposure, just

because they were very clever, not to mention, deceitful with it!

>

> As you have mentioned, Jagbir, we have known about the multiple

I.D.'s of John Noyce for some time now, but just could not prove it.

But now, thanks to Wikipedia, they have exposed this deception

through the use of CheckUser, and i agree that since this is the

case, John Noyce is impudent to expect you to apologize to him! i

doubt that he will ever apologize to you though, because i don't

think he has that kind of a conscience. It seems he can do anything

in the 'name of WCASY'! Still, i am speechless, that the whole

organisation of Sahaja Yoga has been 'so overcome' through the

manipulation into positions of power, by 'administratively deceptive'

people, claiming to be Sahaja Yogis - but their heart is far from it!

>

> Will the organisation ever recover from this deception? i don't

know for sure. Can integrity yet come out from the younger

generation, in spite of this 'early deception'? Hasn't everyone's

hands already been 'thoroughly tied'? i remember a Sahaja Yogini

telling me that Shri Mataji told her in about the 80's, in reference

to administration, that: " they will tie everything up! "

>

> So what's left now, that they have " tied everything up? " Where has

the integrity of the organisation gone? Of course, this is a

shameful 'eyesore' in the organisation, yet it is only by exposure

that the pus in the wound can be healed - except that we are talking

about a spiritual organisation here! Every organisation needs

honesty, but a spiritual organisation has by its very nature, to be

based on honesty, on integrity! If a spiritual organisation is not

based on honesty, on integrity, what is left of its " spiritual " part?!

>

> regards to all,

>

> violet

>

>

> -- In , " jagbir

> singh " <adishakti_org@> wrote:

> >

> > User talk:Sahajhist

> > From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

> > Jump to: navigation, search

> > CheckUser evidence has confirmed that you have used multiple

> accounts

> > abusively, see user:WikiPossum and user:MonitorMan. I would warn

> you

> > that any repetition of this behaviour may lead to an immediate

> block

> > from further editing. Guy (Help!) 12:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

> >

> > Sahajhist is my old ID. MonitorMan is my new ID. Sahajhist 13:15,

9

> > December 2007 (UTC)

> > I see you've blocked my new ID indefinately so its back to the old

> > one. Tiresome. Sahajhist 15:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

> > " Old ID " ? Monitorman began editing on November 19, 2007[1] (by

> > participating in a thread to which Sahajhist had already

> contributed

> > [2]). Since then " Sahajhist " has made 23 edits, not including

> > today's. Changing usernames is OK, using multiple ones at the same

> > time in the same articles is not.

> >

> > Sahajhist 12:45, November 12, 2007 (hist) (diff) Sahaja Yoga

> (revert -

> > really Simon!)

> > 58.109.99.153 14:39, November 12, 2007 (hist) (diff) Sahaja Yoga

> (rvt

> > (yawn))

> > WikiPossum 15:04, November 12, 2007 (hist) (diff) Sahaja Yoga (rvt

> -

> > no yawn)

> > Please remember that the rule is " one editor, one account " . Please

> > read and comply with WP:SOCK. Using multiple accounts to

> participate

> > in a mediation,[3], to make snide remarks,[4][5], to promote

> yourself

> > [6], or to disrupt an RfC[7] is just plain deceitful. ·:· Will

> Beback

> > ·:· 20:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

> >

> > you have been busy. Do you have a life in the real world? (still

> > posting as)Sahajhist 21:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

> >

> > Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sahajhist "

> >

> >

> > Dear self-realized souls,

> >

> > It looks like Sahajist (John Noyce) is as deceitful as Sfacets is

> > horny and porny. John Noyce has always used multiple IDs to

mislead

> > others - ALWAYS! That is his deceitful way of " loading the dice "

in

> > his favor. He has no qualms about being dishonest as it is not

easy

> > to get caught on the Internet. But folks, he is against guys who

> are

> > internet savvy and have tools like CheckUser to nail cheats. And

> when

> > Will Beback nailed him John Noyce could only pathetically lash

> back.

> >

> > i have claimed in previous posts that John Noyce uses multiple IDs

> to

> > deceive the unsuspecting. So i will be archiving this Wikipedia

> > article as evidence of what i have known for years.

> >

> > This whole Sahajist and Sfacets Wikipedia adventure is turning out

> > into a fiasco. It is a shame that compared to deceitful Sahajist

> and

> > horny, porny Sfacets, ordinary folks like Will Beback are acting

> far

> > more honestly and morally. How come more than two decades of SY

> > meditation, footsoaking and treatments cannot rid WCASY approved

> John

> > Noyce of such negativity? And what can i say of Sfacets?

> >

> > Just a few days ago on Dec. 5, 2007 John Noyce had the temerity

> (and

> > lack of both intelligence and judgment) to defend his horny, porny

> > pal Sfacets. He sent Violet an email:

> >

> > >

> > > 2. If you look more carefully at sfacets' bittorrent

> > > upload page, you'll see that what Jagbir is objecting

> > > to in his usual colourful language are in fact

> > > adverts. These adverts have absolutely nothing to do

> > > with sfacets whatsoever. Check it for yourself. I'd

> > > say Jagbir needs to apologise for jumping to

> > > conclusions.

> > >

> >

> > i waited for nearly a week to positively confirm John Noyce's lack

> of

> > both intelligence and judgment about his horny, porny friend

> Sfacets.

> > Instead of asking Sfacets to remove his links from the X-rated

page

> >

> > http://www.btmon.com/comment_author/sfacets

> >

> > John Noyce is asking an apology from me???!!!! Both John Noyce and

> > Sfacets do not have the common sense and shame to do what any

self-

> > realized soul would do - remove all links at that X-rated page. As

> > far as John Noyce is concerned " These adverts have absolutely

> nothing

> > to do with sfacets whatsoever. " In other words, those obscene, X-

> > rated images should in no way reflect on Sfacets or his state of

> self-

> > realization. Since that is the case John Noyce, how about

> advertising

> > Sahaja Yoga at bittorrent with a nice photo of Shri Mataji? i

think

> > Sfacets has space for that on his page.

> >

> > regards to all,

> >

> > jagbir

> >

> >

> >

> > >

> > > Sfacets pokes a spear into Christ's abdomen and taunts the

> > > Savior: " I am John Noyce's accomplice who also keeps deleting

the

> > > links and am as active as the devil in preventing humanity from

> > > receiving your message of the Last Judgment. "

> > >

> > > Hope that makes your day Sfacets,

> > >

> > > jagbir

> > >

> > >

> > > Note: Sfacets, all these posts are being permanently archived at

> > > http://sahajayoga-shrimataji.org/ so that future generations

will

> > > know exactly what transpired during the winter of Shri Mataji's

> > > life. As the designated night-soil carrier of Sahaja Yoga i

would

> > > value your opinion and feedback if i am up to task.

> > >

> >

> > And thanks Sfacets for behaving in an uncivilized manner at

> Wikipedia

> > which scores highly in my reports on Sahaj Love. So keep up the

> good

> > Sahaja Yoga work you are doing in public with John Noyce. Surely

> WCASY

> > will one day share Shri Mataji's Will with both of you ..........

> or

> > at least with John Noyce.

> >

> > But it is your horny nature er, ............ i mean porny too,

that

> > disturbs me Sfacets. i know you are a tetesterone-laden 24 year-

old

> > roaming the Melbourne campus for relief, but why do you want us to

> > watch all these X-rated t*ts, pu**ies and ar**s with you?

> >

> > http://www.btmon.com/comment_author/sfacets

> >

> > Well, that is another feather in your illustrious cap John Noyce.

> So

> > when can we expect you and co-author Sfacets to publish " The Kama

> > Yoga of Sahaja Sutra " ?

> >

> > jagbir

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Jagbir and All,

 

That was incredibly fortunate that you got that evidence to nail one of the

'deceivers' of Sahaja Yoga - of Her Last Judgment and Resurrection Message. i

looked at the URL you presented on the forum of:

 

sahaja-yoga-response/

 

i read with interest, Post No. 823, where you, Jagbir, wrote:

 

" Now when Balwinder finally clears the air, which i also requested, ZY just

can't keep his mouth shut. He just keeps on nit-picking on petty issues which

only keeps dragging this issue on. Why can't ZY just let Balwinder say his side

of the story and let matters rest?

 

And if he had just done that the forum members would not have known that he was

that " Indian co-moderator " . i do not know how Balwinder is taking it but if it

had been me then i would have been pretty sore that no one informed me, as

moderator, that the Indian chap from Down Under was actually an Aussie from Down

Under. Why wasn't Dr. Balwinder informed of this, (not that I am looking for an

answer)?

 

So instead of apologizing for keeping him in the dark ZY wants to put Balwinder

down a notch or two for having challenged his co-moderating. He just cannot

allow others the courtesy of clarification nor refrain from unnecessary

comments. Unlike Dr. Balwinder i wonder what professional reputation and public

trust ZY has to defend with all his constant salvos? Can we have closure on this

subject please? "

 

sahaja-yoga-response/message/823?threaded=1 & l=1

 

i read that you describe this 'Zen Yogi' as 'nit-picking on petty issues and

dragging out issues'. Then you suggest that he is not an 'Indian co-moderator',

but an 'Aussie' from Down-Under. Once he is discovered, instead of apologizing

for his deceit in his position of co-moderator - he attacks Dr. Balwinder, who

picked him up on this deceit!

 

Jagbir, i am concluding and am sure i am 99.99999999% correct, that this 'Zen

Yogi' must have been John Noyce! As you know, i like to forensically examine

discrepancies, especially when they are used against Her Identity, Mission, and

Message. Putting together the details that this person nitpicks, gets himself

into an important position (eg. co-moderator), is found out to be deceptive,

puts down another fellow Sahaja Yogi, turns out to be an Aussie from

Down-Under...... well, i know only one such SY from Down-Under. It had to be

John Noyce!

 

i remember Shri Mataji saying that there were these people (administrators) who

were extremely sophisticated in their methods to gain control. i guess 'using

deceit' to gain control, was one of their 'sophisticated methods'.

 

What can i say! i am flabbergasted at this exposure, and it is only the

beginning, i think. What else will we discover?!

 

regards to all,

 

violet

 

 

 

 

, " jagbir

singh " <adishakti_org wrote:

>

> Dear Violet and All,

>

> i checked to follow up on John Noyce's Wikipedia deception and, to

my

> surprise, the thread has been deleted. i have thus realized that we

> have been very lucky indeed to catch John Noyce red-handed. (i use

> " we " because Violet was the one who first alerted me to John Noyce

> and Sfacets editing out http://www.adishakti.org from Wikipedia.)

>

> In the first place, you must join just as the comments are posted.

> Then there is a narrow timeframe to copy them as John Noyce deletes

> the incriminating evidence almost immediately. Indeed we have been

so

> fortunate to have nabbed him. Something just made me check Wikipedia

> in the nick of time.

>

> i have also found out something about Wikipedia's Checkuser:

>

> " Checkuser

> Wikipedia operates a process known as Checkuser to identify some

sock

> puppets in certain cases. Where it is unclear whether or not sock

> puppetry is in progress, server log information can be consulted. To

> comply with Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy, this is limited to

a

> handful of users with checkuser privilege and only done in serious

> cases, with reasonable cause, to check if user A is the same as user

> B based upon some evidence. "

>

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry

>

> Having access to Checkuser is something like obtaining a search

> warrant from a judge. You are only granted if solid evidence of

> suspected criminal activity is presented. So in John Noyce's case it

> was a slam dunk as Will Beback had a thick dossier on JN's past use

of

> multiple IDs, a fact that is well-known among those SYs unfortunate

to

> work with him. (Remember sahaja-yoga-

response/ John Noyce?)

>

> >

> > Will the organisation ever recover from this deception? i don't

> > know for sure. Can integrity yet come out from the younger

> > generation, in spite of this 'early deception'? Hasn't everyone's

> > hands already been 'thoroughly tied'? i remember a Sahaja Yogini

> > telling me that Shri Mataji told her in about the 80's, in

> > reference to administration, that: " they will tie everything up! "

> >

>

> Violet, all your fears will come true if you remain silent. But here

> we are not only exposing the bare butts of these deceitful, WCASY-

> approved candidates but spanking them sore too. However, it is the

> evidence gathered and archived that will turn the tide in future. i

> am very sure that Shri Mataji will triumph despite the John Noyces,

> Alan Wherrys and Yogi Mahajans within the organization.

>

> It is without question that the turning point and force will come

> from outside the organization. One day we will all witness the birth

> of an organization based on the true, transparent teachings and

> Divine Message of Shri Mataji. So do not empower the present

deceitful

> SYSSR organization in any way. It will only delay the onset of the

> Blossom Time that Shri Mataji has so tirelessly campaigned for more

> than three decades. How much time does our 84-year-old Divine Mother

> still have to see that Dawn of Truth?

>

> >

> > Shri Mataji said a couple of months ago that if SYM doesn't work

in

> > America then the whole world will be lost.

> >

>

> Not only will Sahaja Yoga Meditation not work in America, or

anywhere

> else for the matter, as long as we have deceitful people running the

> organization. Whether it is the false advertisments of the present

> Sahaja Yoga organization or the fake IDs of John Noyce, they confirm

> a deceitful collective mindset.

>

> Main Entry: de·ceit·ful

> : having a tendency or disposition to deceive:

> a: not honest <a deceitful child>

> b: deceptive, misleading <deceitful advertising>

>

> Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

>

> regards to all,

>

> jagbir

>

>

> , " Violet "

> <violet.tubb@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Jagbir and self-realised Souls,

> >

> > Incredible! And this is the very same deceit that is backed by

> WCASY. It is also the very same deceit that has been used to prevent

> Sahaja Yogis in the organisation, from giving Her Identity, Mission,

> and Message of the Last Judgment and Resurrection to the world!

> Surely, they didn't think they had immunity from exposure, just

> because they were very clever, not to mention, deceitful with it!

> >

> > As you have mentioned, Jagbir, we have known about the multiple

> I.D.'s of John Noyce for some time now, but just could not prove it.

> But now, thanks to Wikipedia, they have exposed this deception

> through the use of CheckUser, and i agree that since this is the

> case, John Noyce is impudent to expect you to apologize to him! i

> doubt that he will ever apologize to you though, because i don't

> think he has that kind of a conscience. It seems he can do anything

> in the 'name of WCASY'! Still, i am speechless, that the whole

> organisation of Sahaja Yoga has been 'so overcome' through the

> manipulation into positions of power, by 'administratively

deceptive'

> people, claiming to be Sahaja Yogis - but their heart is far from

it!

> >

> > Will the organisation ever recover from this deception? i don't

> know for sure. Can integrity yet come out from the younger

> generation, in spite of this 'early deception'? Hasn't everyone's

> hands already been 'thoroughly tied'? i remember a Sahaja Yogini

> telling me that Shri Mataji told her in about the 80's, in reference

> to administration, that: " they will tie everything up! "

> >

> > So what's left now, that they have " tied everything up? " Where has

> the integrity of the organisation gone? Of course, this is a

> shameful 'eyesore' in the organisation, yet it is only by exposure

> that the pus in the wound can be healed - except that we are talking

> about a spiritual organisation here! Every organisation needs

> honesty, but a spiritual organisation has by its very nature, to be

> based on honesty, on integrity! If a spiritual organisation is not

> based on honesty, on integrity, what is left of its " spiritual "

part?!

> >

> > regards to all,

> >

> > violet

> >

> >

> > -- In , " jagbir

> > singh " <adishakti_org@> wrote:

> > >

> > > User talk:Sahajhist

> > > From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

> > > Jump to: navigation, search

> > > CheckUser evidence has confirmed that you have used multiple

> > accounts

> > > abusively, see user:WikiPossum and user:MonitorMan. I would warn

> > you

> > > that any repetition of this behaviour may lead to an immediate

> > block

> > > from further editing. Guy (Help!) 12:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

> > >

> > > Sahajhist is my old ID. MonitorMan is my new ID. Sahajhist

13:15,

> 9

> > > December 2007 (UTC)

> > > I see you've blocked my new ID indefinately so its back to the

old

> > > one. Tiresome. Sahajhist 15:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

> > > " Old ID " ? Monitorman began editing on November 19, 2007[1] (by

> > > participating in a thread to which Sahajhist had already

> > contributed

> > > [2]). Since then " Sahajhist " has made 23 edits, not including

> > > today's. Changing usernames is OK, using multiple ones at the

same

> > > time in the same articles is not.

> > >

> > > Sahajhist 12:45, November 12, 2007 (hist) (diff) Sahaja Yoga

> > (revert -

> > > really Simon!)

> > > 58.109.99.153 14:39, November 12, 2007 (hist) (diff) Sahaja Yoga

> > (rvt

> > > (yawn))

> > > WikiPossum 15:04, November 12, 2007 (hist) (diff) Sahaja Yoga

(rvt

> > -

> > > no yawn)

> > > Please remember that the rule is " one editor, one account " .

Please

> > > read and comply with WP:SOCK. Using multiple accounts to

> > participate

> > > in a mediation,[3], to make snide remarks,[4][5], to promote

> > yourself

> > > [6], or to disrupt an RfC[7] is just plain deceitful. ·:· Will

> > Beback

> > > ·:· 20:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

> > >

> > > you have been busy. Do you have a life in the real world? (still

> > > posting as)Sahajhist 21:45, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

> > >

> > > Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

User_talk:Sahajhist "

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear self-realized souls,

> > >

> > > It looks like Sahajist (John Noyce) is as deceitful as Sfacets

is

> > > horny and porny. John Noyce has always used multiple IDs to

> mislead

> > > others - ALWAYS! That is his deceitful way of " loading the dice "

> in

> > > his favor. He has no qualms about being dishonest as it is not

> easy

> > > to get caught on the Internet. But folks, he is against guys who

> > are

> > > internet savvy and have tools like CheckUser to nail cheats. And

> > when

> > > Will Beback nailed him John Noyce could only pathetically lash

> > back.

> > >

> > > i have claimed in previous posts that John Noyce uses multiple

IDs

> > to

> > > deceive the unsuspecting. So i will be archiving this Wikipedia

> > > article as evidence of what i have known for years.

> > >

> > > This whole Sahajist and Sfacets Wikipedia adventure is turning

out

> > > into a fiasco. It is a shame that compared to deceitful Sahajist

> > and

> > > horny, porny Sfacets, ordinary folks like Will Beback are acting

> > far

> > > more honestly and morally. How come more than two decades of SY

> > > meditation, footsoaking and treatments cannot rid WCASY approved

> > John

> > > Noyce of such negativity? And what can i say of Sfacets?

> > >

> > > Just a few days ago on Dec. 5, 2007 John Noyce had the temerity

> > (and

> > > lack of both intelligence and judgment) to defend his horny,

porny

> > > pal Sfacets. He sent Violet an email:

> > >

> > > >

> > > > 2. If you look more carefully at sfacets' bittorrent

> > > > upload page, you'll see that what Jagbir is objecting

> > > > to in his usual colourful language are in fact

> > > > adverts. These adverts have absolutely nothing to do

> > > > with sfacets whatsoever. Check it for yourself. I'd

> > > > say Jagbir needs to apologise for jumping to

> > > > conclusions.

> > > >

> > >

> > > i waited for nearly a week to positively confirm John Noyce's

lack

> > of

> > > both intelligence and judgment about his horny, porny friend

> > Sfacets.

> > > Instead of asking Sfacets to remove his links from the X-rated

> page

> > >

> > > http://www.btmon.com/comment_author/sfacets

> > >

> > > John Noyce is asking an apology from me???!!!! Both John Noyce

and

> > > Sfacets do not have the common sense and shame to do what any

> self-

> > > realized soul would do - remove all links at that X-rated page.

As

> > > far as John Noyce is concerned " These adverts have absolutely

> > nothing

> > > to do with sfacets whatsoever. " In other words, those obscene,

X-

> > > rated images should in no way reflect on Sfacets or his state of

> > self-

> > > realization. Since that is the case John Noyce, how about

> > advertising

> > > Sahaja Yoga at bittorrent with a nice photo of Shri Mataji? i

> think

> > > Sfacets has space for that on his page.

> > >

> > > regards to all,

> > >

> > > jagbir

> > >

> > > -------------------------------

--

> > >

> > > >

> > > > Sfacets pokes a spear into Christ's abdomen and taunts the

> > > > Savior: " I am John Noyce's accomplice who also keeps deleting

> the

> > > > links and am as active as the devil in preventing humanity

from

> > > > receiving your message of the Last Judgment. "

> > > >

> > > > Hope that makes your day Sfacets,

> > > >

> > > > jagbir

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Note: Sfacets, all these posts are being permanently archived

at

> > > > http://sahajayoga-shrimataji.org/ so that future generations

> will

> > > > know exactly what transpired during the winter of Shri

Mataji's

> > > > life. As the designated night-soil carrier of Sahaja Yoga i

> would

> > > > value your opinion and feedback if i am up to task.

> > > >

> > >

> > > And thanks Sfacets for behaving in an uncivilized manner at

> > Wikipedia

> > > which scores highly in my reports on Sahaj Love. So keep up the

> > good

> > > Sahaja Yoga work you are doing in public with John Noyce. Surely

> > WCASY

> > > will one day share Shri Mataji's Will with both of you

..........

> > or

> > > at least with John Noyce.

> > >

> > > But it is your horny nature er, ............ i mean porny too,

> that

> > > disturbs me Sfacets. i know you are a tetesterone-laden 24 year-

> old

> > > roaming the Melbourne campus for relief, but why do you want us

to

> > > watch all these X-rated t*ts, pu**ies and ar**s with you?

> > >

> > > http://www.btmon.com/comment_author/sfacets

> > >

> > > Well, that is another feather in your illustrious cap John

Noyce.

> > So

> > > when can we expect you and co-author Sfacets to publish " The

Kama

> > > Yoga of Sahaja Sutra " ?

> > >

> > > jagbir

> > >

> >

>