RE : What are the identifying characteristics of a Divine Incarnation?

[Guest guest]

Dear all, Namasté !

 

Jay Shri Mataji !

 

Nobody will or can replace Shri Mataji!!!!!!!!!

As we had under Moises the time of " the father " ,

With Christ " The Son "

Now the time of " The Mother " ,

 

We will have to wait another 2000 years for a new

Yuga...

Untill then " we " ought to establish " Her Kingdom " ,

and before She will leave , She will tell us

everything " HERSELF " and nobody else!

 

Love to all ... **Sharmila**

 

--- caraleen98 <caraleen98 a écrit :

 

>

> Dear Jagbir and friends,

> The question I am asking is what many people are

> asking. What has

> Shri Mataji said about the future of the SY

> organisation and SY? Are

> people to be too afraid of being attacked to ask and

> say openly and

> honestly what is in their hearts and minds? I don't

> want people's

> opinions or prejudices; I want the words of Shri

> Mataji.

> And for the record; anyone who thinks that I would

> wish the pain and

> terrible treatment that incarnations always face on

> someone I love

> must be cracked in the head.

> Love, Semira

>

>

>

> ,

> " jagbir singh "

> <adishakti_org wrote:

> >

> > BINGO! Let the record stand!

> >

> > ,

> " caraleen98 "

> > <caraleen98@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Jagbir,

> > > The person who is to be Shri Mataji's successor

> will make no

> claims

> > > of divinity, or desire any worship or glory for

> their own

> person,

> > > but will draw and focus the attention of all to

> the Eternal

> Mother.

> > > Love, Semira

> > >

> > > ,

> " jagbir singh "

> > > <adishakti_org@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > ,

> " caraleen98 "

> > > > <caraleen98@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Friends,

> > > > > Did Shri Mataji say specifically that She

> has no earthly

> > > successor?

> > > > > What are Her words on this subject?

> > > > > Love, Semira

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Semira,

> > > >

> > > > i am 100% sure Shri Mataji has never ever

> mentioned any earthly

> > > > successor. It is just absurd to even

> contemplete this - it is

> a

> > > sure

> > > > sign that you have quite a distance to cover.

> Worse are those

> who

> > > > claim Sir CP is the incarnation of Shri Shiva.

> But nothing

> beats

> > > SYs

> > > > who believe that WCASY is re/presenting Her

> Will.

> > > >

> > > > However there always will be sick individuals

> claiming

> divinity -

> > > > praise and empower them at your own peril! Is

> Ishmael on your

> mind

> > > > Semira? Perhaps Violet's question: " What are

> the identifying

> > > > characteristics of a Divine Incarnation? "

> gives you hope. i am

> > > quite

> > > > sure you would want to worship Ishmael too (or

> are already

> doing

> > > so).

> > > > Refute that categorically and i will apologize

> in public. If

> not,

> > > let

> > > > the record stand.

> > > >

> > > > regards,

> > > >

> > > > jagbir

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > --- In

> , " Violet "

> > > > > <violet.tubb@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Jagbir,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thank you for this explanation. It is just

> so well put. i

> will

> > > > > definitely be keeping this Post No. in my

> filing system, to

> > refer

> > > > > to. Being the Adi Shakti requires very

> specific fulfilment.

> i

> > > have

> > > > > never heard of someone being 'discovered' as

> an incarnation

> at a

> > > > > senior age. Usually it is very early in

> their childhood,

> even at

> > > > > birth, that it is recognized by enlightened

> ones, that the

> > person

> > > > is

> > > > > an incarnation. Signs usually accompany, as

> they did with

> Shri

> > > > > Mataji Nirmala Devi's parents.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > There are a lot of 'would be Mataji's'

> being proclaimed,

> but

> > > how

> > > > > much 'eschatology' and 'entrenchment' do

> they really have in

> all

> > > > the

> > > > > Scriptures?! It also surprises me, how often

> if the the

> husband

> > > or

> > > > > wife is 'declared to be an incarnation',

> that people decide

> > their

> > > > > married partner has to be one too! This

> propensity always

> smacks

> > > > > of 'dynasty-making' to me. That is why i am

> so pleased that

> Shri

> > > > > Mataji never said that there was another

> incarnation in Her

> > > family.

> > > > > i am also pleased that She never appointed

> any successor,

> which

> > > is

> > > > > also in the tradition of Christ Jesus, who

> also never

> appointed

> > > any

> > > > > successor. It's not a dynasty, which is

> usually 'man-made'!

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Jagbir, do you know, if there were actual

> real husband and

> > wife

> > > > > incarnations on Earth at the same time. i

> know we hear of

> > > > > Lakshmi/Vishnu, Shiva/Parvati, Radha/Krishna

> and so forth in

> the

> > > > > legends. Did these actually reincarnate

> together, which it

> seems

> > > > > they did?! i feel they must have done so.

> But i would not

> mind

> > > > > confirmation on that, to be sure.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Sometimes also, as in Christ Jesus and

> Mother Mary,

> > > incarnations

> > > > > were together on Earth, in this case as Son

> and Mother, but

> the

> > > > > Mother sort of stayed in the background,

> purposely it seems.

> Yet

> > > > the

> > > > > annunciation and specialty of Mother Mary

> was there, as a

> young

> > > > > woman, in the early years!

> > > > > >

>

=== message truncated ===

 

 

 

______________________________\

____________

Mail innove : interface hyper pratique, messenger intégré, couleurs -

http://mail..fr