Why We Critique Only Islam!

[Guest guest]

Frequently we are facing one common accusation from the Islamists,

semi-Islamists and even from the moderate (ignorant) Muslims—which is

" why only critiquing Islam " and why not critiquing also other

religions? This is of course a very prudent question. And this question

needs to be answered by the group of critics. Critics may think that

enough have been discussed about the fallacies of Islam everywhere in

the whole world. By now every simple mind should understand very well

as to why we only critique Islam! But I am not surprised by the

question, because we must know that—childhood brainwashing of those

moderate Muslims and utter hypocrisies of those erudite Islamists they

mostly fail to realize the truth simply due to their sheer blind-faith

in Islam.

In this essay, I would like to make a hypothetical comparison

between the Islam and all other major religions of the world. I shall

try to establish the very unique and special character of the religion Islam

by an honest and impartial judgment. I shall attempt to answer this

very prudent question by my own style. That is, I will generate the

right answers from the mouth of those questioners themselves. Instead of answering this question, let me ask those Islamists, moderate Muslims and others the following questions:

America has a super plural society having many religions

(Christian, Hindu, Muslim, Jews, Buddha's etc). Every day, every hour

or every minute—we are sick and tired of hearing in the radio, TV, or

newspapers some very common (colorful) adjectives, such as: Muslim

militants, Muslim terrorists, Islamic terrorists, Islamic radicals, and

Islamic militants, Islamic fanatics, Al-Qeada, and Taliban. My

question is that, why do not we hear about terrorists or radicals of

any other religions? Why do not we hear these kind of ear-soothing

colorful adjectives about those millions of atheists, agnostics or even

Homosexual guys? Why it is always attached with the peaceful (?) ISLAM?

In the North America and throughout the western world—there

are hundreds of societies bearing the name of only one religion and

that is ISLAM. Examples: AMC, AMA, NABIC, ICNA, ISNA, CAIR etc. etc.

There are hundreds of Ummatic organizations/societies throughout the

North America and elsewhere in the whole world. Ummatic organizations

mostly preach segregation/isolation of Muslims from other peoples in

general in the host countries. They teach Muslims that they are

superior and their religion is superior and ask to guard their children

from mixing with the western " rotten " society. As a result, future

generations of Muslims can not blend with the society of host country

resulting isolationists and problematic youngsters in an alien society.

Ultimate result is the scenario of item# 13 below. In this, I have many questions: How many Ummatic organizations for Hindu, Christian or Jews can we find? Why no such organization is needed by any other religions? Why only the people of Muslim origin need such Ummatic

organization? What is the purpose of such organization?

Can we find Jihadi organization in any other religions

such: Islamic Jihad, Hamas, Hizbullah, Horkut-ul- Jihad,

Horkut-ul-mujahedin, Jaise Muhamad, Jihad-e-Muhammad,

Tahrik-e-Nifaj-shariaat-e-Muhammad, Al-Hikhma, Al-badr-Mujaheddin,

Jamah-e-Islamia, Hijb-e-Islamia, etc. etc.??? We can find several

dozens of Jihadi Islamic terrorist organizations exists in every Muslim

country throughout the world. Can we find such organization in other religions? If not, then why?

We can find dozens of countries ruled by Islamic Shariaat

(Huhud laws) where Quran is the only viable constitution. Remaining

Muslim majority countries also have family laws enforced as per Quranic

laws. We can still find many Islamic Republics exist in this modern

world of 21st century. My questions here are: Can we find

any country ruled by Bible, Old Testament or Ghita today? Can we find

just one Republic for Christian, Jewish, Hindus or Buddhas? If the

answer is no, then please tell us why no?

Islam has become a fearful religion in the whole world today.

Islamic terrorists are conspiring to kill innocent civilians,

especially western civilians everywhere in the whole world. Whole

civilized world is in a panic situation for fear of Islamic terrorism. Very

recently, German police have arrested an al-Qaeda sympathizer and his

fiancé on suspicion of planning to bomb the U.S. Army's European

headquarters and other targets in Heidelberg, Germany. Interestingly

these arrested al-Qaeda sympathizers were none but Muslims who kept pictures of Osama bin Laden in their apartment.

My questions are: why could not these two human beings belonging Hindu,

Jew or Christian? Why can't we incriminate any other religion for the

similar cause?

Honor killing is the most inhuman and most disgraceful act by any human standard. This act is condemned by any sane human being today. But surprisingly—this horrendous episode is only present

 

in the Muslim countries and Muslim societies. Islamists will argue that

there is nothing in the Quran which suggests honor killing! Well,

question here is, if Islam has nothing to do with it, then why it is

only practiced by Muslims? NO OTHER SOCIETIES EXCEPTISLAM PRACTICE IT, PERIOD.

Even in the same country—example Nigeria, Northern Nigerian (Muslims)

do practice this heinous act, but Southern Nigeria (Christians) do not

practice this at all. It may present in any country in the whole

world—but 100% sure that it will happened only in a Muslim family. My

questions here are—please tell me why Muslims only perform this heinous

act? Why this act is totally absent in any other religions? Today in the whole world Muslims are apologetic to the entire

humankind for the shameful terrorisms and constantly trying to erase

this stigma by various apologetic fruitless arguments and excuses. They

are trying very hard to disown Osam Bin Laden and other Islamic

terrorists by saying " Islam has been hijacked " etc. Very recently, ISNA

(Islamic Society of North America) held four days full-fledged program

in the Washington, D.C. to disown the burden of doubt in Islam by using

same-old apologetic slogans— " Islam is a religion of peace " or Prophet Muhammad is the God's mercy to earth " etc. These Islamists of North America also tried to fool the westerners (may be they fooled themselves

)

by quoting a few good/kind Quranic verses. They all simply blamed

Western Media for projecting Islam as the religion of terrorism. With

much hypocrisy they absolutely hide all those hundreds of

hateful/dreadful Quranic verses. My question here is—why any other religionists do not need to do all these hypocrisies like Islamists are doing today?

" Jihad " is the most fearful and despised word

spoken/uttering throughout the whole world today. This famous word

" Jihad " belongs to one religion, and that is— " Islam " . My question is—why Jihad belongs to only Islam?

Suicide-bombing only to kill innocent human beings

is committed by Muslims only. In Palestine-Israeli conflict hundreds of

incidents of such heinous suicide attempts have occurred so far. It was

quite obvious that all these suicide bombers were brainwashed by the fiery inspirational teachings by Islamic clergy citingvarious Quranic dictums and hadiths.

Among the Palestine citizens there are good percentage of Christian

minority who support Palestinian cause and they are also enemy of

Israel. Surprisingly, not a single " suicide bomber " could be found who

was a Christian. My questions here are—why there was no suicide bomber evolved out of those Christian-born Palestinians?Why it is the only Muslims committing this horrendous act of suicide bombing?

 

Mosque-Islamic center connections: all most every

terrorist arrested or identified so far, they obviously (without fail)

belonged to some Mosque or Islamic center. It was quite apparent that

the terrorists arrested or dead was later identified as the

member/visitor of certain famous Mosque or Islamic center. In most

cases—Muslims attacked their rivals after the Friday prayers, because

the fiery sermons of the Imam of the Mosque energize these fanatics. My

questions here are—if Islam and Mosque has nothing to do with

terrorists then why they could not be belonged to some other religious

center such as Hindu Temple, Jewish Temple, Buddhist temple or

Christian church? Or why they could not be even the members of some

atheists/agnostic/homosexual clubs?

Pure (Pukka) Muslims: all most all the terrorists

(John walker Lind, Zakaria Moussai, Padia etc.) so far arrested or

known to the authority are very pure and devoutly good practicing bearded Muslims.

Just last week, Swedish authority has arrested one suspected terrorist

from onboard an aircraft who attempted to hijack the plane and crash it

to the American Embassy in the Western Europe. Later he was identified

as the bearded young Tunisian born devout Muslim by the name Kerim

shatty who wanted to go to join the Islamic conference in London. My

questions are: Why they (terrorists) could not be from some moderate or

not so good Muslim group? Why always terrorist have to be one of those

most devout pukka Muslims? What possibly is the obvious indication

here? Isn't it true that any true followers (real Muslim who follows Quran and hadiths) of Islam could be a terrorist?

Converts: we know conversion to other religion is a

common phenomenon throughout the world. Many people convert to Islam,

Christianity, Buddhism etc. My questions are why it is only those

Muslim converts turn into terrorists or Taliban (American Taliban,

Shoe-bomber and dirty bomber suspect—they all are converted Muslims)?

Why any other converts (Hindu or Christian) could not be a Taliban or

terrorist?

Clash of immigrants with the host: very recently,

there were riots between the immigrant British citizens and the host

Britons. Surprisingly those immigrant British citizens were none other

than the Muslim immigrants (mainly Pakistani and Bangladeshi). Britain

has the immigrants from various countries and various religions. My question here is why those rioting-immigrants could not be from any other religions?

Dress code and food restriction: Do you know Islam

has a special dress code for both men and women? Islam is nothing but

Arab nationalism in the disguise of religion. Anybody from any foreign

land convert to Islam also needs to adopt/change his dress and cultural

habits, which is nothing but Arab national dress and Arab culture. A

devout Bangladeshi, Chinese or a Burmese convert to Islam will pretend

to be a good Muslim by wearing Arab garb or hijab for women, even

though his/her own national dress is not at all similar to Arab

national dress. Muslims also follow very strict food codes. Unlike

other religious groups, Muslims can not eat western most hygienically

produced meat products. Muslims need to eat so called un-hygienically

produced halal meat. Convert Muslims even need to learn Arabic for

daily rituals of Islam. They are not allowed to pray in their own

mother tongue. Result is they do not know what they are praying. But

unlike Muslim convert, Hindu, Christian or Jewish converts do not need

to forsake their own national dress code or languages. My questions

here are why the converts of no other religions need to change their

own national dress code or food habits? Why Islam is so different? Coercive imposition: Islam is the only religion in

which peoples are being forced/coerced to observe Islamic daily

rituals. In any Islamic paradise—like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Talibani

Afghanistan, or any other Islamic Arab countries—Islamic police

(Muttawalli) force general citizens to observe daily rituals very

strictly. Anybody who fails to obey is punished by beating severely or

even by imprisonment. Even in the moderate Muslim countries like

Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Malaysia etc. Clergies, general public

or the elders will repeatedly remind or even force people to join the

daily five time prayers/rituals of Islam. Anybody who do not join or

refuse to join will be cursed, looked down or insulted by the seniors. Punishments for the crime: Punishments for the

crime (like stealing, adultery, killings etc.) in Islamic paradise

(Saudi Arabia, Iran, Nigeria, Pakistan, Sudan and many other Arab

nations) according to Allah's laws (Islamic Shariaat or hudud laws) are

cutting/chopping hands, feet and even chopping heads, or stoning death

and lashings one hundred and one times. My questions here are:

could we find such ancient uncivilized/draconian laws in any other

religions today? If the answer is no, then please tell us why?

Brotherhood in Islam: Islam is the only religion

having brotherhood or Ummatic provision. One muslim is considered

brother of another muslim only. A muslim can not be a brother of Hindu,

Christian or Jews or infidels. Muslims are forbidden even to pray for

any infidels. Therefore, Islam is like a large-scale religious cult which does not recognize any other religion as pure religion. My question here is why no other religious group has such separatist brotherhood system?

Islam and poverty: Poverty and Islam goes side by side. Islam

means submission to Allah. Therefore, general muslims become like a

dependent servant of unseen authority in the sky. Muslims loose their

strength and desire of freethinking and innovation. Result is pure

poverty. Look everywhere—muslims are the most poor human beings on

earth. Go to Africa or Asia—every muslim majority country is a

desperately poor country. Please don't try to cite some Arab oil-rich

countries as the denial to my assertion. Because, that happened only

due to the discovery of oil by the west—such as America and Britain.

Before that, all the Arabs were miserably poor country. Muslims are

poor even in a same country or region: In Nigeria—northern (Muslim

majority) people are poor, but southern (Christian majority) people are

rich and affluent. In Europe—only two most poor countries are Bosnia

and Albania. Both of these European countries are populated by convert

Muslims of same Caucasian white peoples. But they are poorer than their

neighbors. My question here is why it has to be always like that?

Muslim World: Do you know we have two worlds in the

same planet earth? One is the real world (with every nation except the

Islamic nations) and other is the Muslim world (with all the

Islamic nations only). Surprisingly, there is no Christian world, no

Hindu world or any Jewish world, Buddies world or infidel world. But we

have Muslim world. My question here is: why there is no Christian, Hindu, Buddies or Jewish world?

Democracy: Democracy was invented to

establish people's rules to govern a nation. Entire mankind know it

well that no religious edicts/rules can be compatible with the modern

democracy. But do you know—Islamists make their laughable claim that,

" Islam is compatible with the democracy " ? Islam is 100% incompatible

with the democracy; even then Islamists readily claim that— " Islam is

compatible with democracy " ! My question here is: do we hear about Christian, Hindu or Jewish democracy?

September 11, Episode: America and other nations of

the entire world will remember Sept.11 as the most terrible day of the

human history and everybody will pass the day with much sorrow and

somber mood. But do you know there are some Islamic folks (special human species) in Finsbury Park Mosque in north London who will celebrate this horrible day as the " towering day " of Islam???

These Islamic fanatics will hail/applaud the Sept.11 devilish deeds of

those al-Qaeda heroes as the best deeds any Muslim can do. They will

form the supreme Islamic council of London and will vow to fight for

making England an Islamic Paradise. Their future plan will be to

convert entire world including infidel America into a perfect Islamic

Paradise. My questions are: do we get to see this kind of madness amongst any other religions? If not then why? -- Haridev S Vhttp://krishnajnehru.blogspot.com/

http://www.wikiislam.com/wiki/Shameful_admissionshttp://www.nehrufamily.com/इनà¥à¤¦à¥à¤°à¤‚ मितà¥à¤°à¤‚ वरà¥à¤£à¤®à¤—à¥à¤¨à¤¿à¤®à¤¾à¤¹à¥à¤°à¤¥à¥‹ दिवà¥à¤¯à¤ƒ स सà¥à¤ªà¤°à¥à¤£à¥‹ गरà¥à¤¤à¥à¤®à¤¾à¤¨ |

à¤à¤•à¤‚ सद विपà¥à¤°à¤¾ बहà¥à¤§à¤¾ वदनà¥à¤¤à¥à¤¯à¤—à¥à¤¨à¤¿à¤‚ यमं मातरिशà¥à¤µà¤¾à¤¨à¤®à¤¾à¤¹à¥à¤ƒ ||