Guest guest Posted January 27, 2008 Report Share Posted January 27, 2008 , " jagbir singh " <adishakti_org wrote: > > > > > Yes, only highly evolved SYs souls practising the awesome SYSSR > > can reach such states of enlightenment. Yogikumund has his work > > cut out for him to reach those levels. And myself, having only > > reached 2% of enlightenment, should not even consider to be the > > dirty salt of their daily foot-soaked feet. > > > > Dear all, > > Recently i received a partial transcript of Shri Mataji's 2007 > Diwali talk where She was critical of SYs: > > " So the first thing you have to do is never be a dishonest person > nor let others become or be dishonest. This is very important and > all of you should together make it possible. > > The milk is adulterated, ghee is adulterated. Where ever I see > everything is adulterated. All the people laugh at us, nobody > believes us.... > > And second point is you don't have to tell any lies. What is the > need to tell any lies? You tell the truth! The person who will > always tell the truth, he will be a special and if he is a Sahaja > Yogi then he will be magnificent. " (Shri Mataji) > > But my point here is not to beg SYs to be honest as i am both tired > and ashamed of myself having to be associated with cowards and > liars. (Maybe there should be no reason for me to be ashamed of the > actions of others, but you have to since tens of thousands are > involved in this collective deceit - TENS OF THOUSANDS!) > " A spiritually imperfect teacher is liable to mislead his disciples. He who does not know the Reality himself cannot impart Truth to his disciples. Sayeth Guru Nanak: — " The disciples whose Guru is blind commit evil deeds. They do everything according to their own will and always tell lies. They practise falsehoods and always slander others. These slanderers drown themselves and all their families " .... For the Buddhist Dhamma is synonymous with Truth. The Buddha identified himself with this immanent and transcendental law of righteousness. In the Pali canon, a person, who is dedicated to this Truth, is a Sikh. Sikhism has approved this doctrine. " If one knoweth, one realiseth that there is but one religion of Truth. " [3] " A Sikh is one who travels towards the house of Truth that the Guru hath built. " [4] So the word Sikh does not mean a mere 'Shishya' (as used in Sanskrit), the pupil, the taught, disciple or a follower. A mere allegiance to a person or doctrine does not make one a Sikh. " A Sikh is one who is dedicated to Truth; he who travels towards the Truth that the Guru has built. " A Sikh is, therefore, one who values Truth above all other things of the world. Those who follow the teachings of Sikh Gurus can be called Sikhs. But if I simply say that Guru Nanak is my Guru, I do not become a Sikh. A Sikh is one in whose character there is regeneration; he is advancing towards the Truth under the guidance of his Guru. He is learning and is following the path of spiritual perfection; he has not realised Perfect Truth as yet; he is on the way. " (3 P. 1188, Adi Granth 4. Adi Granth) Pritam Singh Gill, The Trinity of Sikhism New Academic Publishing Co., Jullundur, India, 1990, p. 162-84. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.