Guest guest Posted April 17, 2008 Report Share Posted April 17, 2008 Dear All, In Part 2 of " The Cosmic Person in the New Testament " , we concluded with these words: When we turn to the earlier Gospels and ask how Jesus was first conceived to have spoken of himself, we should note that when someone addressed him as " good master " , he objected saying, " Why do you call me good? There is no one good but God alone, " (Mark 10:17-18) thus clearly differentiating himself from God. Here now, is Part 3. Enjoy, violet The Cosmic Person in the New Testament - Part 3 (P.117) We can say with certainty that there are two figures with whom Jesus chose to identify himself. The first is that of the Son of Man. It seems absolutely clear that Jesus conceived himself primarily and essentially as the Son of Man. There has been a lot of debate among scholars about this, but that in the synoptic tradition Jesus conceived himself as the Son of Man is unquestionable. It is very revealing that he is practically never referred to as Son of Man in any other of the writings of the early Church. He himself in the Gospel always speaks of himself as Son of Man, and after that the title went out. (P.118) It is almost inconceivable that the Church would have invented this title and given it to him, only to drop it altogether. The term Son of Man is the most meaningful of all the titles of Jesus. The only other example in the New Testament is very soon after Pentecost, when Stephen is martyred and he says, " Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God. " (Acts 7:56) That is the only time it is used apart from Jesus' use of it and after that it drops out altogether. It can be said with certainty, then, that Jesus conceived himself as the Son of Man. What does the term Son of Man mean? First of all it means simply " man " . The Psalmist, for instance, says, " What is man that thou art mindful of him and the son of man that thou dost care for him? " (Psalm 8:4) " Son of man " there is synonymous with " man " . So first of all Jesus presents himself as a man, a man along with the rest of humankind. Secondly, there is an important passage in the Book of Daniel where Daniel sees in his vision, " with the clouds of heaven there came one like a son of man. " (Daniel 7:13) This eschatological Son of Man, a Son of Man who comes at the end of time, was certainly in Jesus' mind. Before the crucifixion, at Jesus' trial before the high priest, the high priest asks him, " Tell us if you are the Christ (the Messiah), the Son of God. " Jesus did not answer that directly because he did not want the title of Messiah which could so easily be misunderstood, but he says, " You have said so. But I tell you, hereafter you will see the Son of Man, seated at the right hand of power and coming on the clouds of heaven. " (Matthew 26:63-64) In this he is clearly identifying himself with the Son of Man in the Book of Daniel who comes at the end of time and receives a kingdom and power and glory, and everything is given to him by God. So Jesus sees himself as man, as a man among men, and as the one who is to come at the end and fulfil all things. (P.119) But he also identifies himself with the suffering servant of Yahweh in the book of Isaiah, that marvellous figure who is the servant of Yahweh rather than Yahweh himself. It is important to be clear that Jesus does not identify himself with Yahweh but with the servant of Yahweh. And that servant of Yahweh is one who suffers on behalf of the world. He gives his life as a sacrifice for many. The fifty-third chapter of Isaiah which speaks of the servant of Yahweh is one of the greatest passages in the Old Testament. Jesus certainly saw himself as the suffering servant, and it seems clear that no one had ever before brought together this transcendent Son of Man coming in the clouds of heaven with the suffering servant who gives his life for the world. So what Jesus did here shows a tremendous insight. Jesus as a man would have been steeped in the Old Testament and would have come to see himself imaged in it. He saw himself as both the Son of Man and as the Suffering Servant of Yahweh and he went obediently to death on the cross because he knew that that was the will of his Father, for the salvation of the world. But Jesus went further. He not only saw himself as man, as Son of Man in heaven, but also he identified himself with all men. He said, " As you did it to one of the least of these my brethren, you did it to me. " (Matthew 25:40) Clearly he understood himself as representative man. Similarly, the suffering servant in Isaiah was representative of Israel. He was apparently an individual but, as we saw in chapter five, he was also representative man. So Jesus is the representative man, the brother of all, who identifies himself with all men and in a real sense represents all men. This leads us to the most interesting question of how the Son of Man is related to the original primordial Man. It is this theme that I particularly want to develop, because this primordial man or cosmic person appears also in the Iranian, Chaldean and Egyptian traditions. (P.120) In other words, these countries surrounding Israel, Persia, Babylon and Egypt all had this idea of a primordial Man, an archetypal Man, from whom creation comes. The idea of the cosmic Person is also developed in Hinduism, Buddhism and in Islam. It is very much a universal concept. It seems clear that if we see Jesus in that context we have an image which relates him much more meaningfully to the history of the world and to humanity's understanding of God. It is very doubtful whether Jesus himself had any knowledge of these traditions, but I think it is very probable that in his mind he understood himself as that primordial Man. Significant here are the passages in St. John's Gospel where Jesus uses the phrase " I am " . " I am " is, of course, the name by which Yahweh revealed himself to Moses and it has become customary to think that by using this phrase Jesus is identifying himself with God. The phrase " before Abraham was I am " , (John 8:58), has certainly been taken to indicate that he must be God. This, I suggest, is not necessarily so. The primordial man was before Abraham and before all men, and I think it is probable that Jesus is identifying himself there with this primordial or heavenly man, who is prior to all creation. A New Vision of Reality (Western Science, Eastern Mysticism and Christian Faith) Bede Griffiths Templegate Publishers - Springfield, Illinois ISBN 0-87243-180-0 Pgs.117-120 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.