Guest guest Posted May 11, 2008 Report Share Posted May 11, 2008 " The experience of Gnosis is a varied phenomenon: your knowing may be prompted by a moment of utter solitude, or by the presence of another person. You may be reading or writing, watching an image or a tree, or gazing only inward. Gnosis, though related both to mysticism and to wisdom, is quite distinct from either. Mysticism, though it comes in many kinds, by no means opposes itself to faith; perhaps indeed it is the most intense form of faith. Wisdom, in the biblical sense, is allied with the prophetic reception of a God who dominates our world, which is seen having fallen away his original Creation. Gnosis grants you acquaintance with a God unknown to, and remote from, this world, a God in exile from a false creation that, in itself, constituted a fall. You yourself, in knowing and being known by this alienated God, come to see that originally your deepest self was no part of the Creation-Fall, but goes back to an archaic time before time, when that deepest self was part of a fullness that was God, a more human God than any worshipped since. I am very aware that my last sentence requires much unpacking, but it was designed for that purpose, because Gnosis is entirely the doctrine of the deep or deepest self. Gnosis essentially is the act of distinguishing the psyche, or soul, from the deepest self, as an act of distinction that is also a recognition. You cannot strengthen your psyche without reacquainting yourself with your original self, compared to which your psyche is only a remnant, a wounded survivor. Peter Brown, in The Body and Society (1988), his study of " Men, Women, and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity, " expresses this succinctly, in an analysis of the Gnostic doctrine of Valentinus: Even the soul, the psyche, the conscious self, had occurred as an afterthought. It swathed the lucid spirit in a thick fog of doubt, anxiety, and passion. The unredeemed lived as in a waking nightmare. All human thought, even the most profound religious quest, was riven with uncertainty and misplaced ambition. Only the spirit had a right to exist. It stirred in the depths of the initiate with a blind, insistent " ferment, " which betrayed its distant origin in the Place of Fullness. This spirit, the pneuma, was the true person (p. 109). The issue of all Gnosis (and of every Gnosticism) is indeed " the true person. " We have an addiction, in the United States, that involves the quest of an authentic self, in oneself and in the other person. " Harold Bloom, Omens of the Millennium: The Gnosis of Angels, Dreams, and Resurrection, pages 183-4 Paperback: 255 pages Publisher: Riverhead Books (October 1, 1997) Language: English ISBN-10: 1573226297 ISBN-13: 978-1573226295 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.