Guest guest Posted May 16, 2008 Report Share Posted May 16, 2008 Dear All, In Part 5 of " The Cosmic Person in the New Testament " , we concluded with these words: (P.123) The letter to the Colossians goes further than this when it speaks of Christ as " the image of the invisible God " (Colossians 1:15). Christ is the image, the icon, of God who is invisible, and an image in the deepest sense is that which reflects, so the text is saying that Christ reflects, or manifests, the invisible God. It goes on in the same verse to refer to him as " the firstborn of creation " , which is to say that Christ is not only the man who comes at the end, but the man who was in the beginning. This is the ancient idea that the spiritual world comes first and the heavenly man is the archetypal man, the man who was in the beginning, who is the exemplar from whom all humanity derives. The original man is precisely the archetype, or the firstborn, of creation. And " in him all things were created...all things were created through him and for him " (Colossians 1:16), but, as we saw previously, not by him. God creates all things in Christ, through Christ and for Christ, for this archetypal man. The text of Colossians goes on to say that " in him all things consist " (Colossians 1:17). (Page 124) In him all things come together and hold together. He becomes that centre which gathers the whole creation into unity. Finally it is said that " in him dwells the fullness of the Godhead bodily " (Colossians 2:9). We can see now precisely how it can come to be said that Jesus is God. He receives the fullness of the Godhead " bodily " , that is, in his human being. He is the Cosmic Man in whom the fullness of the Godhead is revealed. A New Vision of Reality (Western Science, Eastern Mysticism and Christian Faith) Bede Griffiths Templegate Publishers - Springfield, Illinois ISBN 0-87243-180-0 Pgs. 123-124 Here now, is Part 6. Enjoy, violet The Cosmic Person in the New Testament - Part 6 (P.124) This conception of Jesus as the Cosmic Person or Cosmic Lord, who is God's self-manifestation to the world, gives us the key to the New Testament understanding of the relation of Jesus to God. This is shown in the use of the term Son of God, as used both by Jesus himself and by his disciples after him. Whether Jesus himself actually used this language has been debated, but, as Oscar Cullman has shown, it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that it goes back to him, though he used it with great discretion. There is no doubt that Jesus experienced himself in relation to God as a son to a Father. He uses the term 'Abba', " Father " , in addressing God, and it has been shown that this was a term of extreme intimacy. This " Abba experience " was fundamental in the life of Jesus. He knew himself in this relation of profound intimacy with God as his Father, and the statement in both St. Matthew's and St. Luke's Gospels: " No one knows the Son but the Father and no one knows the Father but the Son and he to whom the Son chooses to reveal him " (Matthew 11:27; Luke 10:22), certainly expresses the mind of Jesus himself. He knew himself in this unique mode of consciousness, which could only be expressed by speaking of himself as the Son in a unique sense. This, of course, becomes the main theme of the Gospel of St. John, who was no doubt building on the knowledge of Jesus' own intimate experience. This is borne out in an interesting way in the letter to the Hebrews, where it is said, " God who in various ways spoke of old to our fathers by the prophets, in these last days has spoken to us by a Son, whom he appointed heir of all things and through whom he made the world " (Hebrews 1:2). (P.125) Here Jesus is seen, as in St. Paul, as the " heir of all things " , that is, as the One who " brings all things to a head " and is the end of all evolution, but also as the Cosmic Person through whom the world was made. But it is most interesting that while the writer of the Letter to the Hebrews has this exalted understanding of the nature of Jesus Christ, he at the same time has the most profound sense of his humanity. Nowhere in the New Testament is the human frailty of Jesus brought out so profoundly as in this same letter, where it is said, " In the days of his flesh Jesus offered up prayers and supplications with loud cries and tears to him who was able to save him from death and was heard for his godly fear " . Again the figure of the heavenly man and the suffering servant are brought together, and it is said, " though he was a Son he learned obedience from the things which he suffered " (Hebrews 5:7). Once again we see the rich complexity of the New Testament concept of Christ. To this we have only to add the cry of Jesus on the cross, " My God, my God, why have you forsaken me? " to realise the depth of the mystery of Christ, who though he was " in the form of God " , yet emptied himself and experienced that sense of separation from God, which is the burden of fallen humanity. A New Vision of Reality (Western Science, Eastern Mysticism and Christian Faith) Bede Griffiths Templegate Publishers - Springfield, Illinois ISBN 0-87243-180-0 Pgs. 124-125 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.