Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

The future failure/success of SY will depend on the following...

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear Jagbir and all,

 

i would like to thank you for the 'The future failure/success of SY will depend

on the following' article. i would like to make some comments and ask for some

clarifications on these, please:

 

The future failure/success of SY will depend on the following:

 

i) whether you are going to teach them about the Devi and Her incarnation Shri

Mataji, or just Her incarnation;

 

[Jagbir, i remember Shri Mataji stating that Herself incarnated to introduce us

to our " Individual Mother Within " . Is that Individual Mother Within " the Devi? "

Is that Individual Mother Within " Shri Lalita " , as in 'Shri Lalita Sahasranama'?

Shri Mataji also said that Herself is the " Reflection of the Divine Mother

Within " . Was Shri Mataji referring to this relationship --- that as Incarnation

Adi Shakti, Herself is a Reflection of Devi/Shri Lalita Within?

 

In the actual spiritual relationship, these Names are One. But these 'Names'

also serve a purpose of distinction between the 'individual trees' (Individual

Divine Incarnations) and the 'whole forest' (the Whole Divine Mother Who doesn't

totally Incarnate Herself all at once - which is probably not even the best way

to express this!). But i feel it is important to try and understand it anyway,

to understand this Relationship because - there could lie the difference between

a SY being able to teach about the Devi and Her Incarnation Shri Mataji, or

being able to teach " just about Her incarnation " .]

 

 

 

 

ii) whether you are going to teach them to realize the Devi (Self or Antaryamin)

within themselves, or realize the photo on the altar of Her incarnation Shri

Mataji;

 

[Does not the Internal Living Photo of the Divine Mother Within exist also? Our

Spirit is made in God's Image. With Self-realisation the Image of the Holy

Spirit is awakened within us. We recognize our Divine Mother's Image, that She

is there! That's why at Guru Puja 2008, Shri Mataji said we can give

Self-realisation from our Self! If we are aware of that Divine Photo Within, we

can teach people to realize the Devi (Self or Antaryamin). We can have them go

straight to the Source Within themselves. As Sahaja Yogis, we have the power to

do that.]

 

 

 

 

iii) whether you are going to teach them that the Devi exists as the Divine

Feminine in all religions and holy scriptures, or that the subtle system of the

SYSSR exists in all;

 

[Teaching that the Devi exists as the Divine Feminine in all religions and holy

scriptures, is an essential Grounding that won't ever be forgotten. It is a

Grounding that will prepare people to meet their Individual Mother Within. The

subtle system knowledge is/was practical knowledge to bring Shri Mataji's

disciples up to par, so they would have the working knowledge to transform

themselves, before they could help transform others. But the real transformation

came from the Individual Mother Within! Anyone that thinks that it was their

subtle system practices alone that transformed them, is forgetting about the

Divine Mother's role in their spiritual work. She is the Author of any true

Aid!]

 

 

 

 

iv) whether you are going to teach that " Muslims, Hindus, Christians and all

have to evolve to a higher state " during this Blossom Time, or let them continue

doubting, debating, arguing and eventually fleeing the little known SYSSR

(Sahaja Yoga Subtle System Religion);

 

[We have to go for the Big Picture, that " Muslims, Hindus, Christians and all

have to evolve to a higher state " during this Blossom Time. If we get caught up

in the little known SYSSR, then others will also get caught up in it, and may

never come to know the Divine Feminine within. That is why it is important to

teach " first things first " . If the Divine Feminine is understood, then any

subtle system knowledge can be understood in relation to Her, as an optional

help available if needed, like medicine. i think that is the Spirit in which

Shri Mataji doled out subtle system knowledge in any case, but it has been made

into the SYSSR (Sahaja Yoga Subtle System Religion) of all things, which is

absolutely absurd! Because it was always an aid and not the Goal. SYs got so

involved in the aids, that they lost sight of the Goal - the Divine Mother

Within!]

 

 

 

 

v) whether you are going to teach them to meditate without ANY external rituals

as ALL religions strictly demand, or introduce them to the 1001 rituals of the

SYSSR;

 

[Jagbir, which rituals are you referring to? Are you referring to the Kundalini

Awakening Guided Meditation? What about the Bandhan? What about Balancing one's

energy? Are you saying these are not needed? i thought these basics were needed.

They were really helpful for me, is what i am saying. i don't quite understand

not to use " ANY " rituals. Even the strict religions all have a modicum of

rituals. Or are you saying that is what is needed to reach people in some

particularly strict religions that would not accept any rituals whatsoever that

they are not familiar with? So, that for Hindus, a modicum of basic

rituals/subtle system knowledge would be OK, but for Christians, for example, it

would require simply closing one's eyes, and meditating within, without an

external photo, candle, or incense.]

 

 

 

 

vi) whether you are going to tell them to keep on meditating while learning from

www.adishakti.org on the unity and synthesis of all religions, prophets and holy

scriptures, or the unity of all SYs and their collectives against external

criticism from www.sahajayoga.org and the internet;

 

[Yes, that is without a doubt necessary, to have people meditating while

learning from www.adishakti.org and the synthesis of all religions, prophets and

holy scriptures.]

 

 

 

 

vii) whether you are going to teach about how the corrupted religions have been

restored back to their original purity by the Devi and Her incarnation, or

remain silent on how that purity is now being again corrupted by those in charge

of the SY organization;

 

[Yes, it is important to teach about how the corrupted religions have been

restored back to their original purity by the Devi and Her incarnation, and we

must not remain silent on how that purity has been again corrupted by those in

charge of the SY organisation.]

 

 

 

 

viii) whether you are going to teach about how to be truthful, dharmic and in

vidya right from the start, or to be dishonest, adharmic and in avidya from the

beginning;

 

[Yes, that is very important to teach about how to be truthful, dharmic and in

vidya right from the start!]

 

 

 

 

ix) whether you are going to teach yourself to attain moksa by unconditionally

following the Devi and Her incarnation Shri Mataji, or condemn yourself yet

again into the whirlpool of rebirths by preaching others about the SYSSR.

 

[The choice would of course have to teach oneself to attain moksha by

unconditionally following the Devi and Her incarnation Shri Mataji - not the

avidya of the SYSSR.]

 

 

 

 

x) whether you are going to teach them to be their own gurus by forming a new

group based on all the above guidelines, or invite them back to the SYSSR

meditation groups/collectives that 99.99 have consistently always fled for more

than three decades;

 

[Yes, this is a new opportunity to guide others into the Sahaja Yoga that Shri

Mataji taught, and not the SYSSR from which so many have fled over the decades.]

 

 

 

 

> The above applies to all who worship the Devi within and follow Her

> incarnation, Shri Mataji, without. If you cannot be honest and

> upfront to others, it is better you not incur the penalty of

> rebirth. You will never ever liberate yourself and enter the

> Kingdom of God by deliberately misleading humanity. SSSYR SYs claim

> others are false gurus. Are they any better?

>

> But for me SYs are worse because unlike them, false gurus teach out

> of ignorance. Unlike SYs, false gurus also teach out of a genuine

> desire to be truthful and conscientious towards fellow human beings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Jagbir,

 

Re Point v) appended...

 

.....Or are you giving a guideline for a New Organisation, in which we need to be

more 'Standard' in the way we operate. i know the Devi can liberate us without

any rituals. That we can just turn to Her Within. Are you suggesting we turn

right away from all rituals, as an organisation, so nobody need be turned off by

any rituals whatsoever? Do you believe the SYSSR has so spoiled Shri Mataji's

teachings that we really need to go in the opposite direction, and have no

rituals whatsoever? i know this is a somewhat contentious issue, but it would be

good to get your take on this. Do you believe people can have their spiritual

liberation without any ritual help, whatsoever? That is the main point, i would

say.

 

warmest regards,

 

violet

 

 

 

v) whether you are going to teach them to meditate without ANY external rituals

as ALL religions strictly demand, or introduce them to the 1001 rituals of the

SYSSR;

 

[Jagbir, which rituals are you referring to? Are you referring to the Kundalini

Awakening Guided Meditation? What about the Bandhan? What about Balancing one's

energy? Are you saying these are not needed? i thought these basics were needed.

They were really helpful for me, is what i am saying. i don't quite understand

not to use " ANY " rituals. Even the strict religions all have a modicum of

rituals. Or are you saying that is what is needed to reach people in some

particularly strict religions that would not accept any rituals whatsoever that

they are not familiar with? So, that for Hindus, a modicum of basic

rituals/subtle system knowledge would be OK, but for Christians, for example, it

would require simply closing one's eyes, and meditating within, without an

external photo, candle, or incense.]

 

 

, " Violet " <violetubb

wrote:

>

> Dear Jagbir and all,

>

> i would like to thank you for the 'The future failure/success of SY

will depend on the following' article. i would like to make some

comments and ask for some clarifications on these, please:

>

> The future failure/success of SY will depend on the following:

>

> i) whether you are going to teach them about the Devi and Her

incarnation Shri Mataji, or just Her incarnation;

>

> [Jagbir, i remember Shri Mataji stating that Herself incarnated to

introduce us to our " Individual Mother Within " . Is that Individual

Mother Within " the Devi? " Is that Individual Mother Within " Shri

Lalita " , as in 'Shri Lalita Sahasranama'? Shri Mataji also said that

Herself is the " Reflection of the Divine Mother Within " . Was Shri

Mataji referring to this relationship --- that as Incarnation Adi

Shakti, Herself is a Reflection of Devi/Shri Lalita Within?

>

> In the actual spiritual relationship, these Names are One. But these

'Names' also serve a purpose of distinction between the 'individual

trees' (Individual Divine Incarnations) and the 'whole forest' (the

Whole Divine Mother Who doesn't totally Incarnate Herself all at once

- which is probably not even the best way to express this!). But i

feel it is important to try and understand it anyway, to understand

this Relationship because - there could lie the difference between a

SY being able to teach about the Devi and Her Incarnation Shri Mataji,

or being able to teach " just about Her incarnation " .]

>

>

>

>

> ii) whether you are going to teach them to realize the Devi (Self or

Antaryamin) within themselves, or realize the photo on the altar of

Her incarnation Shri Mataji;

>

> [Does not the Internal Living Photo of the Divine Mother Within

exist also? Our Spirit is made in God's Image. With Self-realisation

the Image of the Holy Spirit is awakened within us. We recognize our

Divine Mother's Image, that She is there! That's why at Guru Puja

2008, Shri Mataji said we can give Self-realisation from our Self! If

we are aware of that Divine Photo Within, we can teach people to

realize the Devi (Self or Antaryamin). We can have them go straight to

the Source Within themselves. As Sahaja Yogis, we have the power to do

that.]

>

>

>

>

> iii) whether you are going to teach them that the Devi exists as the

Divine Feminine in all religions and holy scriptures, or that the

subtle system of the SYSSR exists in all;

>

> [Teaching that the Devi exists as the Divine Feminine in all

religions and holy scriptures, is an essential Grounding that won't

ever be forgotten. It is a Grounding that will prepare people to meet

their Individual Mother Within. The subtle system knowledge is/was

practical knowledge to bring Shri Mataji's disciples up to par, so

they would have the working knowledge to transform themselves, before

they could help transform others. But the real transformation came

from the Individual Mother Within! Anyone that thinks that it was

their subtle system practices alone that transformed them, is

forgetting about the Divine Mother's role in their spiritual work. She

is the Author of any true Aid!]

>

>

>

>

> iv) whether you are going to teach that " Muslims, Hindus, Christians

and all have to evolve to a higher state " during this Blossom Time, or

let them continue doubting, debating, arguing and eventually fleeing

the little known SYSSR (Sahaja Yoga Subtle System Religion);

>

> [We have to go for the Big Picture, that " Muslims, Hindus,

Christians and all have to evolve to a higher state " during this

Blossom Time. If we get caught up in the little known SYSSR, then

others will also get caught up in it, and may never come to know the

Divine Feminine within. That is why it is important to teach " first

things first " . If the Divine Feminine is understood, then any subtle

system knowledge can be understood in relation to Her, as an optional

help available if needed, like medicine. i think that is the Spirit in

which Shri Mataji doled out subtle system knowledge in any case, but

it has been made into the SYSSR (Sahaja Yoga Subtle System Religion)

of all things, which is absolutely absurd! Because it was always an

aid and not the Goal. SYs got so involved in the aids, that they lost

sight of the Goal - the Divine Mother Within!]

>

>

>

>

> v) whether you are going to teach them to meditate without ANY

external rituals as ALL religions strictly demand, or introduce them

to the 1001 rituals of the SYSSR;

>

> [Jagbir, which rituals are you referring to? Are you referring to

the Kundalini Awakening Guided Meditation? What about the Bandhan?

What about Balancing one's energy? Are you saying these are not

needed? i thought these basics were needed. They were really helpful

for me, is what i am saying. i don't quite understand not to use " ANY "

rituals. Even the strict religions all have a modicum of rituals. Or

are you saying that is what is needed to reach people in some

particularly strict religions that would not accept any rituals

whatsoever that they are not familiar with? So, that for Hindus, a

modicum of basic rituals/subtle system knowledge would be OK, but for

Christians, for example, it would require simply closing one's eyes,

and meditating within, without an external photo, candle, or incense.]

>

>

>

>

> vi) whether you are going to tell them to keep on meditating while

learning from www.adishakti.org on the unity and synthesis of all

religions, prophets and holy scriptures, or the unity of all SYs and

their collectives against external criticism from www.sahajayoga.org

and the internet;

>

> [Yes, that is without a doubt necessary, to have people meditating

while learning from www.adishakti.org and the synthesis of all

religions, prophets and holy scriptures.]

>

>

>

>

> vii) whether you are going to teach about how the corrupted

religions have been restored back to their original purity by the Devi

and Her incarnation, or remain silent on how that purity is now being

again corrupted by those in charge of the SY organization;

>

> [Yes, it is important to teach about how the corrupted religions

have been restored back to their original purity by the Devi and Her

incarnation, and we must not remain silent on how that purity has been

again corrupted by those in charge of the SY organisation.]

>

>

>

>

> viii) whether you are going to teach about how to be truthful,

dharmic and in vidya right from the start, or to be dishonest,

adharmic and in avidya from the beginning;

>

> [Yes, that is very important to teach about how to be truthful,

dharmic and in vidya right from the start!]

>

>

>

>

> ix) whether you are going to teach yourself to attain moksa by

unconditionally following the Devi and Her incarnation Shri Mataji, or

condemn yourself yet again into the whirlpool of rebirths by preaching

others about the SYSSR.

>

> [The choice would of course have to teach oneself to attain moksha

by unconditionally following the Devi and Her incarnation Shri Mataji

- not the avidya of the SYSSR.]

>

>

>

>

> x) whether you are going to teach them to be their own gurus by

forming a new group based on all the above guidelines, or invite them

back to the SYSSR meditation groups/collectives that 99.99 have

consistently always fled for more than three decades;

>

> [Yes, this is a new opportunity to guide others into the Sahaja Yoga

that Shri Mataji taught, and not the SYSSR from which so many have

fled over the decades.]

>

>

>

>

> > The above applies to all who worship the Devi within and follow Her

> > incarnation, Shri Mataji, without. If you cannot be honest and

> > upfront to others, it is better you not incur the penalty of

> > rebirth. You will never ever liberate yourself and enter the

> > Kingdom of God by deliberately misleading humanity. SSSYR SYs claim

> > others are false gurus. Are they any better?

> >

> > But for me SYs are worse because unlike them, false gurus teach out

> > of ignorance. Unlike SYs, false gurus also teach out of a genuine

> > desire to be truthful and conscientious towards fellow human beings.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Jagbir,

 

i have one more point to make. Is what you are saying a case of " Knowledge of

the Devi alone, liberates " ? If we have knowledge of the Devi Within, our

relationship with Her alone, will liberate us. Correct?! That is my experience.

The subtle system work helped me, but the Devi alone liberated me.

 

violet

 

 

 

, " Violet " <violetubb

wrote:

>

> Dear Jagbir,

>

> Re Point v) appended...

>

> ....Or are you giving a guideline for a New Organisation, in which

we need to be more 'Standard' in the way we operate. i know the Devi

can liberate us without any rituals. That we can just turn to Her

Within. Are you suggesting we turn right away from all rituals, as an

organisation, so nobody need be turned off by any rituals whatsoever?

Do you believe the SYSSR has so spoiled Shri Mataji's teachings that

we really need to go in the opposite direction, and have no rituals

whatsoever? i know this is a somewhat contentious issue, but it would

be good to get your take on this. Do you believe people can have their

spiritual liberation without any ritual help, whatsoever? That is the

main point, i would say.

>

> warmest regards,

>

> violet

>

>

>

> v) whether you are going to teach them to meditate without ANY

external rituals as ALL religions strictly demand, or introduce them

to the 1001 rituals of the SYSSR;

>

> [Jagbir, which rituals are you referring to? Are you referring to

the Kundalini Awakening Guided Meditation? What about the Bandhan?

What about Balancing one's energy? Are you saying these are not

needed? i thought these basics were needed. They were really helpful

for me, is what i am saying. i don't quite understand not to use " ANY "

rituals. Even the strict religions all have a modicum of rituals. Or

are you saying that is what is needed to reach people in some

particularly strict religions that would not accept any rituals

whatsoever that they are not familiar with? So, that for Hindus, a

modicum of basic rituals/subtle system knowledge would be OK, but for

Christians, for example, it would require simply closing one's eyes,

and meditating within, without an external photo, candle, or incense.]

>

>

> , " Violet " <violetubb@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Jagbir and all,

> >

> > i would like to thank you for the 'The future failure/success of SY

> will depend on the following' article. i would like to make some

> comments and ask for some clarifications on these, please:

> >

> > The future failure/success of SY will depend on the following:

> >

> > i) whether you are going to teach them about the Devi and Her

> incarnation Shri Mataji, or just Her incarnation;

> >

> > [Jagbir, i remember Shri Mataji stating that Herself incarnated to

> introduce us to our " Individual Mother Within " . Is that Individual

> Mother Within " the Devi? " Is that Individual Mother Within " Shri

> Lalita " , as in 'Shri Lalita Sahasranama'? Shri Mataji also said that

> Herself is the " Reflection of the Divine Mother Within " . Was Shri

> Mataji referring to this relationship --- that as Incarnation Adi

> Shakti, Herself is a Reflection of Devi/Shri Lalita Within?

> >

> > In the actual spiritual relationship, these Names are One. But these

> 'Names' also serve a purpose of distinction between the 'individual

> trees' (Individual Divine Incarnations) and the 'whole forest' (the

> Whole Divine Mother Who doesn't totally Incarnate Herself all at once

> - which is probably not even the best way to express this!). But i

> feel it is important to try and understand it anyway, to understand

> this Relationship because - there could lie the difference between a

> SY being able to teach about the Devi and Her Incarnation Shri Mataji,

> or being able to teach " just about Her incarnation " .]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ii) whether you are going to teach them to realize the Devi (Self or

> Antaryamin) within themselves, or realize the photo on the altar of

> Her incarnation Shri Mataji;

> >

> > [Does not the Internal Living Photo of the Divine Mother Within

> exist also? Our Spirit is made in God's Image. With Self-realisation

> the Image of the Holy Spirit is awakened within us. We recognize our

> Divine Mother's Image, that She is there! That's why at Guru Puja

> 2008, Shri Mataji said we can give Self-realisation from our Self! If

> we are aware of that Divine Photo Within, we can teach people to

> realize the Devi (Self or Antaryamin). We can have them go straight to

> the Source Within themselves. As Sahaja Yogis, we have the power to do

> that.]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > iii) whether you are going to teach them that the Devi exists as the

> Divine Feminine in all religions and holy scriptures, or that the

> subtle system of the SYSSR exists in all;

> >

> > [Teaching that the Devi exists as the Divine Feminine in all

> religions and holy scriptures, is an essential Grounding that won't

> ever be forgotten. It is a Grounding that will prepare people to meet

> their Individual Mother Within. The subtle system knowledge is/was

> practical knowledge to bring Shri Mataji's disciples up to par, so

> they would have the working knowledge to transform themselves, before

> they could help transform others. But the real transformation came

> from the Individual Mother Within! Anyone that thinks that it was

> their subtle system practices alone that transformed them, is

> forgetting about the Divine Mother's role in their spiritual work. She

> is the Author of any true Aid!]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > iv) whether you are going to teach that " Muslims, Hindus, Christians

> and all have to evolve to a higher state " during this Blossom Time, or

> let them continue doubting, debating, arguing and eventually fleeing

> the little known SYSSR (Sahaja Yoga Subtle System Religion);

> >

> > [We have to go for the Big Picture, that " Muslims, Hindus,

> Christians and all have to evolve to a higher state " during this

> Blossom Time. If we get caught up in the little known SYSSR, then

> others will also get caught up in it, and may never come to know the

> Divine Feminine within. That is why it is important to teach " first

> things first " . If the Divine Feminine is understood, then any subtle

> system knowledge can be understood in relation to Her, as an optional

> help available if needed, like medicine. i think that is the Spirit in

> which Shri Mataji doled out subtle system knowledge in any case, but

> it has been made into the SYSSR (Sahaja Yoga Subtle System Religion)

> of all things, which is absolutely absurd! Because it was always an

> aid and not the Goal. SYs got so involved in the aids, that they lost

> sight of the Goal - the Divine Mother Within!]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > v) whether you are going to teach them to meditate without ANY

> external rituals as ALL religions strictly demand, or introduce them

> to the 1001 rituals of the SYSSR;

> >

> > [Jagbir, which rituals are you referring to? Are you referring to

> the Kundalini Awakening Guided Meditation? What about the Bandhan?

> What about Balancing one's energy? Are you saying these are not

> needed? i thought these basics were needed. They were really helpful

> for me, is what i am saying. i don't quite understand not to use " ANY "

> rituals. Even the strict religions all have a modicum of rituals. Or

> are you saying that is what is needed to reach people in some

> particularly strict religions that would not accept any rituals

> whatsoever that they are not familiar with? So, that for Hindus, a

> modicum of basic rituals/subtle system knowledge would be OK, but for

> Christians, for example, it would require simply closing one's eyes,

> and meditating within, without an external photo, candle, or incense.]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > vi) whether you are going to tell them to keep on meditating while

> learning from www.adishakti.org on the unity and synthesis of all

> religions, prophets and holy scriptures, or the unity of all SYs and

> their collectives against external criticism from www.sahajayoga.org

> and the internet;

> >

> > [Yes, that is without a doubt necessary, to have people meditating

> while learning from www.adishakti.org and the synthesis of all

> religions, prophets and holy scriptures.]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > vii) whether you are going to teach about how the corrupted

> religions have been restored back to their original purity by the Devi

> and Her incarnation, or remain silent on how that purity is now being

> again corrupted by those in charge of the SY organization;

> >

> > [Yes, it is important to teach about how the corrupted religions

> have been restored back to their original purity by the Devi and Her

> incarnation, and we must not remain silent on how that purity has been

> again corrupted by those in charge of the SY organisation.]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > viii) whether you are going to teach about how to be truthful,

> dharmic and in vidya right from the start, or to be dishonest,

> adharmic and in avidya from the beginning;

> >

> > [Yes, that is very important to teach about how to be truthful,

> dharmic and in vidya right from the start!]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ix) whether you are going to teach yourself to attain moksa by

> unconditionally following the Devi and Her incarnation Shri Mataji, or

> condemn yourself yet again into the whirlpool of rebirths by preaching

> others about the SYSSR.

> >

> > [The choice would of course have to teach oneself to attain moksha

> by unconditionally following the Devi and Her incarnation Shri Mataji

> - not the avidya of the SYSSR.]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > x) whether you are going to teach them to be their own gurus by

> forming a new group based on all the above guidelines, or invite them

> back to the SYSSR meditation groups/collectives that 99.99 have

> consistently always fled for more than three decades;

> >

> > [Yes, this is a new opportunity to guide others into the Sahaja Yoga

> that Shri Mataji taught, and not the SYSSR from which so many have

> fled over the decades.]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > > The above applies to all who worship the Devi within and follow Her

> > > incarnation, Shri Mataji, without. If you cannot be honest and

> > > upfront to others, it is better you not incur the penalty of

> > > rebirth. You will never ever liberate yourself and enter the

> > > Kingdom of God by deliberately misleading humanity. SSSYR SYs claim

> > > others are false gurus. Are they any better?

> > >

> > > But for me SYs are worse because unlike them, false gurus teach out

> > > of ignorance. Unlike SYs, false gurus also teach out of a genuine

> > > desire to be truthful and conscientious towards fellow human beings.

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, " Violet "

<violetubb wrote:

>

> Dear Jagbir,

>

> Re Point v) appended...

>

> ....Or are you giving a guideline for a New Organisation, in which

we need to be more 'Standard' in the way we operate. i know the Devi

can liberate us without any rituals. That we can just turn to Her

Within. Are you suggesting we turn right away from all rituals, as an

organisation, so nobody need be turned off by any rituals whatsoever?

Do you believe the SYSSR has so spoiled Shri Mataji's teachings that

we really need to go in the opposite direction, and have no rituals

whatsoever? i know this is a somewhat contentious issue, but it would

be good to get your take on this. Do you believe people can have

their spiritual liberation without any ritual help, whatsoever? That

is the main point, i would say.

>

> warmest regards,

>

> violet

>

>

 

Yes Violet, the " Devi can liberate us without any rituals " . i do not

see any need for the 1001 SYSSR rituals, most of which are known

human innovations and corruption of Her teachings. Even a single

ritual is one too many. Accept one and you have to include the other

1000.

 

And i am not giving a guideline for a new organization, just reminding

all that the nature of the Divine is primal, profound Samaadhi:

 

Arbad narbad dhun dhookaaraa.

For endless eons, there was only utter darkness.

Dharan na gagnaa hukam apaaraa.

There was no earth or sky; there was only the infinite Command of His Hukam.

Naa din rain na chand na sooraj sunn samaaDh lagaa-idaa.||1||

There was no day or night, no moon or sun; God sat in primal, profound Samaadhi.

||1||

 

http://www.aykaa-mayee.org/

 

and Silence on Self is that primal, profound Samaadhi! Adding even a

single ritual, dogma, dress code, dietary rule, religious verse, or

anything for that matter is corruption of a most sacred and secret

Truth.

 

>

> v) whether you are going to teach them to meditate without ANY

external rituals as ALL religions strictly demand, or introduce them

to the 1001 rituals of the SYSSR;

>

> [Jagbir, which rituals are you referring to? Are you referring to

the Kundalini Awakening Guided Meditation? What about the Bandhan?

What about Balancing one's energy? Are you saying these are not

needed? i thought these basics were needed. They were really helpful

for me, is what i am saying. i don't quite understand not to

use " ANY " rituals. Even the strict religions all have a modicum of

rituals. Or are you saying that is what is needed to reach people in

some particularly strict religions that would not accept any rituals

whatsoever that they are not familiar with? So, that for Hindus, a

modicum of basic rituals/subtle system knowledge would be OK, but for

> Christians, for example, it would require simply closing one's eyes,

and meditating within, without an external photo, candle, or incense.]

>

 

Once the Kundalini awakening takes place there is no need for rituals.

Shri Mataji has said that the Mother Kundalini takes care of all our

problems. So why must we innovate?

 

Balancing one's energy with the hand is a placebo, no matter how you

argue it. The same goes for all rituals using lemons, chillies,

coconuts, candles, strings, paper and what not. No one seems to

understand that it is the individual's attention/awareness/

consciousness that brings results/heals. As mentioned earlier, adding

even a single ritual, dogma, dress code, dietary rule, religious

verse, or anything for that matter is corruption of a most sacred and

secret Truth.

 

So if you introduce ritual #1, which worked for you, then another

will introduce ritual #2 that gave good results. Then you cannot stop

others from ritual #3, #4, #5 ........... #1001, and they will

recommend you follow too.

 

And what may work for you may not work for many, and vice versa.

Sahaja Yoga is full of such inconsistencies. And when you have 1001

rituals it is a madhouse, to say the least. But despite all these

1001 rituals many SYs have all trypes of catches, fears, phobias,

imbalances. The SYSSR has more holes in it than Swiss cheese. It is

better you flee and regain your sanity and then work towards Self-

realization.

 

Today i do not even raise my kundalini or say a single mantra to

meditate as i feel the cool breeze 24/7. i am grateful that i left SY

and can now advance and make progress towards that primal, profound

Samaadhi. i have never felt so free, free from all types of rules and

doctrines that the vast majority of the religious faithful blindly

follow in ignorance.

 

Violet, you said that " Even the strict religions all have a modicum

of rituals " . The reply is: " Yes, even the strict religions all have a

modicum of rituals but centuries of dogma and indoctrination of these

institutions have made their followers fools and slaves of ignorance. "

What is the difference between physical and mental rituals? You should

know that physical rituals are much easier to give up in order to

bring about healing and enlightenment.

 

>

>

> , " Violet " <violetubb@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Jagbir and all,

> >

> > i would like to thank you for the 'The future failure/success of

SY

> will depend on the following' article. i would like to make some

> comments and ask for some clarifications on these, please:

> >

> > The future failure/success of SY will depend on the following:

> >

> > i) whether you are going to teach them about the Devi and Her

> incarnation Shri Mataji, or just Her incarnation;

> >

> > [Jagbir, i remember Shri Mataji stating that Herself incarnated to

> introduce us to our " Individual Mother Within " . Is that Individual

> Mother Within " the Devi? " Is that Individual Mother Within " Shri

> Lalita " , as in 'Shri Lalita Sahasranama'? Shri Mataji also said that

> Herself is the " Reflection of the Divine Mother Within " . Was Shri

> Mataji referring to this relationship --- that as Incarnation Adi

> Shakti, Herself is a Reflection of Devi/Shri Lalita Within?

> >

> > In the actual spiritual relationship, these Names are One. But

these

> 'Names' also serve a purpose of distinction between the 'individual

> trees' (Individual Divine Incarnations) and the 'whole forest' (the

> Whole Divine Mother Who doesn't totally Incarnate Herself all at

once

> - which is probably not even the best way to express this!). But i

> feel it is important to try and understand it anyway, to understand

> this Relationship because - there could lie the difference between a

> SY being able to teach about the Devi and Her Incarnation Shri

Mataji,

> or being able to teach " just about Her incarnation " .]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ii) whether you are going to teach them to realize the Devi (Self

or

> Antaryamin) within themselves, or realize the photo on the altar of

> Her incarnation Shri Mataji;

> >

> > [Does not the Internal Living Photo of the Divine Mother Within

> exist also? Our Spirit is made in God's Image. With Self-realisation

> the Image of the Holy Spirit is awakened within us. We recognize our

> Divine Mother's Image, that She is there! That's why at Guru Puja

> 2008, Shri Mataji said we can give Self-realisation from our Self!

If

> we are aware of that Divine Photo Within, we can teach people to

> realize the Devi (Self or Antaryamin). We can have them go straight

to

> the Source Within themselves. As Sahaja Yogis, we have the power to

do

> that.]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > iii) whether you are going to teach them that the Devi exists as

the

> Divine Feminine in all religions and holy scriptures, or that the

> subtle system of the SYSSR exists in all;

> >

> > [Teaching that the Devi exists as the Divine Feminine in all

> religions and holy scriptures, is an essential Grounding that won't

> ever be forgotten. It is a Grounding that will prepare people to

meet

> their Individual Mother Within. The subtle system knowledge is/was

> practical knowledge to bring Shri Mataji's disciples up to par, so

> they would have the working knowledge to transform themselves,

before

> they could help transform others. But the real transformation came

> from the Individual Mother Within! Anyone that thinks that it was

> their subtle system practices alone that transformed them, is

> forgetting about the Divine Mother's role in their spiritual work.

She

> is the Author of any true Aid!]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > iv) whether you are going to teach that " Muslims, Hindus,

Christians

> and all have to evolve to a higher state " during this Blossom Time,

or

> let them continue doubting, debating, arguing and eventually fleeing

> the little known SYSSR (Sahaja Yoga Subtle System Religion);

> >

> > [We have to go for the Big Picture, that " Muslims, Hindus,

> Christians and all have to evolve to a higher state " during this

> Blossom Time. If we get caught up in the little known SYSSR, then

> others will also get caught up in it, and may never come to know the

> Divine Feminine within. That is why it is important to teach " first

> things first " . If the Divine Feminine is understood, then any subtle

> system knowledge can be understood in relation to Her, as an

optional

> help available if needed, like medicine. i think that is the Spirit

in

> which Shri Mataji doled out subtle system knowledge in any case, but

> it has been made into the SYSSR (Sahaja Yoga Subtle System Religion)

> of all things, which is absolutely absurd! Because it was always an

> aid and not the Goal. SYs got so involved in the aids, that they

lost

> sight of the Goal - the Divine Mother Within!]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > v) whether you are going to teach them to meditate without ANY

> external rituals as ALL religions strictly demand, or introduce them

> to the 1001 rituals of the SYSSR;

> >

> > [Jagbir, which rituals are you referring to? Are you referring to

> the Kundalini Awakening Guided Meditation? What about the Bandhan?

> What about Balancing one's energy? Are you saying these are not

> needed? i thought these basics were needed. They were really helpful

> for me, is what i am saying. i don't quite understand not to

use " ANY "

> rituals. Even the strict religions all have a modicum of rituals. Or

> are you saying that is what is needed to reach people in some

> particularly strict religions that would not accept any rituals

> whatsoever that they are not familiar with? So, that for Hindus, a

> modicum of basic rituals/subtle system knowledge would be OK, but

for

> Christians, for example, it would require simply closing one's eyes,

> and meditating within, without an external photo, candle, or

incense.]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > vi) whether you are going to tell them to keep on meditating while

> learning from www.adishakti.org on the unity and synthesis of all

> religions, prophets and holy scriptures, or the unity of all SYs and

> their collectives against external criticism from www.sahajayoga.org

> and the internet;

> >

> > [Yes, that is without a doubt necessary, to have people meditating

> while learning from www.adishakti.org and the synthesis of all

> religions, prophets and holy scriptures.]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > vii) whether you are going to teach about how the corrupted

> religions have been restored back to their original purity by the

Devi

> and Her incarnation, or remain silent on how that purity is now

being

> again corrupted by those in charge of the SY organization;

> >

> > [Yes, it is important to teach about how the corrupted religions

> have been restored back to their original purity by the Devi and Her

> incarnation, and we must not remain silent on how that purity has

been

> again corrupted by those in charge of the SY organisation.]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > viii) whether you are going to teach about how to be truthful,

> dharmic and in vidya right from the start, or to be dishonest,

> adharmic and in avidya from the beginning;

> >

> > [Yes, that is very important to teach about how to be truthful,

> dharmic and in vidya right from the start!]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ix) whether you are going to teach yourself to attain moksa by

> unconditionally following the Devi and Her incarnation Shri Mataji,

or

> condemn yourself yet again into the whirlpool of rebirths by

preaching

> others about the SYSSR.

> >

> > [The choice would of course have to teach oneself to attain moksha

> by unconditionally following the Devi and Her incarnation Shri

Mataji

> - not the avidya of the SYSSR.]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > x) whether you are going to teach them to be their own gurus by

> forming a new group based on all the above guidelines, or invite

them

> back to the SYSSR meditation groups/collectives that 99.99 have

> consistently always fled for more than three decades;

> >

> > [Yes, this is a new opportunity to guide others into the Sahaja

Yoga

> that Shri Mataji taught, and not the SYSSR from which so many have

> fled over the decades.]

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > > The above applies to all who worship the Devi within and follow

Her

> > > incarnation, Shri Mataji, without. If you cannot be honest and

> > > upfront to others, it is better you not incur the penalty of

> > > rebirth. You will never ever liberate yourself and enter the

> > > Kingdom of God by deliberately misleading humanity. SSSYR SYs

claim

> > > others are false gurus. Are they any better?

> > >

> > > But for me SYs are worse because unlike them, false gurus teach

out

> > > of ignorance. Unlike SYs, false gurus also teach out of a

genuine

> > > desire to be truthful and conscientious towards fellow human

beings.

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Jagbir

 

This poetry is so beautiful. Is this Kabir's ?

 

Preeti--- On Fri, 10/31/08, jagbir singh <adishakti_org wrote:

jagbir singh <adishakti_org Re: The future failure/success of SY will depend on the following... Date: Friday, October 31, 2008, 5:04 PM

 

 

adishakti_sahaja_ yoga@ .com, "Violet" <violetubb@. ..> wrote:>> Dear Jagbir,> > Re Point v) appended...> > ....Or are you giving a guideline for a New Organisation, in which we need to be more 'Standard' in the way we operate. i know the Devi can liberate us without any rituals. That we can just turn to Her Within. Are you suggesting we turn right away from all rituals, as an organisation, so nobody need be turned off by any rituals whatsoever? Do you believe the SYSSR has so spoiled Shri Mataji's teachings that we really need to go in the opposite direction, and have no rituals whatsoever? i know this is a somewhat contentious issue, but it would be good to get your take on this. Do you believe people can have their spiritual liberation without any ritual

help, whatsoever? That is the main point, i would say.> > warmest regards,> > violet> > Yes Violet, the "Devi can liberate us without any rituals". i do not see any need for the 1001 SYSSR rituals, most of which are known human innovations and corruption of Her teachings. Even a single ritual is one too many. Accept one and you have to include the other 1000.And i am not giving a guideline for a new organization, just remindingall that the nature of the Divine is primal, profound Samaadhi:Arbad narbad dhun dhookaaraa.For endless eons, there was only utter darkness.Dharan na gagnaa hukam apaaraa.There was no earth or sky; there was only the infinite Command of His Hukam. Naa din rain na chand na sooraj sunn samaaDh lagaa-idaa.| |1||There was no day or night, no moon or sun; God sat in primal, profound Samaadhi. ||1|| http://www.aykaa- mayee.org/and Silence on Self is that primal, profound Samaadhi! Adding even a single ritual, dogma, dress code, dietary rule, religious verse, or anything for that matter is corruption of a most sacred and secret Truth.> > v) whether you are going to teach them to meditate without ANY external rituals as ALL religions strictly demand, or introduce them to the 1001 rituals of the SYSSR;> > [Jagbir, which rituals are you referring to? Are you referring to the Kundalini Awakening Guided Meditation? What about the Bandhan? What about Balancing one's energy? Are you saying these are not needed? i thought these basics were needed. They were really helpful for me, is what i am saying. i don't quite understand not to use "ANY" rituals. Even the strict religions all have a modicum of rituals. Or

are you saying that is what is needed to reach people in some particularly strict religions that would not accept any rituals whatsoever that they are not familiar with? So, that for Hindus, a modicum of basic rituals/subtle system knowledge would be OK, but for > Christians, for example, it would require simply closing one's eyes,and meditating within, without an external photo, candle, or incense.]>Once the Kundalini awakening takes place there is no need for rituals.Shri Mataji has said that the Mother Kundalini takes care of all our problems. So why must we innovate?Balancing one's energy with the hand is a placebo, no matter how you argue it. The same goes for all rituals using lemons, chillies, coconuts, candles, strings, paper and what not. No one seems to understand that it is the individual's attention/awareness /consciousness that brings results/heals. As mentioned earlier,

adding even a single ritual, dogma, dress code, dietary rule, religious verse, or anything for that matter is corruption of a most sacred and secret Truth.So if you introduce ritual #1, which worked for you, then another will introduce ritual #2 that gave good results. Then you cannot stop others from ritual #3, #4, #5 ........... #1001, and they will recommend you follow too.And what may work for you may not work for many, and vice versa. Sahaja Yoga is full of such inconsistencies. And when you have 1001 rituals it is a madhouse, to say the least. But despite all these 1001 rituals many SYs have all trypes of catches, fears, phobias, imbalances. The SYSSR has more holes in it than Swiss cheese. It is better you flee and regain your sanity and then work towards Self-realization.Today i do not even raise my kundalini or say a single mantra to meditate as i feel the cool breeze

24/7. i am grateful that i left SY and can now advance and make progress towards that primal, profound Samaadhi. i have never felt so free, free from all types of rules and doctrines that the vast majority of the religious faithful blindly follow in ignorance.Violet, you said that "Even the strict religions all have a modicum of rituals". The reply is: "Yes, even the strict religions all have a modicum of rituals but centuries of dogma and indoctrination of these institutions have made their followers fools and slaves of ignorance."What is the difference between physical and mental rituals? You shouldknow that physical rituals are much easier to give up in order to bring about healing and enlightenment.> > > adishakti_sahaja_ yoga@ .com, "Violet" <violetubb@>>

wrote:> >> > Dear Jagbir and all,> >> > i would like to thank you for the 'The future failure/success of SY> will depend on the following' article. i would like to make some> comments and ask for some clarifications on these, please:> >> > The future failure/success of SY will depend on the following:> >> > i) whether you are going to teach them about the Devi and Her> incarnation Shri Mataji, or just Her incarnation;> >> > [Jagbir, i remember Shri Mataji stating that Herself incarnated to> introduce us to our "Individual Mother Within". Is that Individual> Mother Within "the Devi?" Is that Individual Mother Within "Shri> Lalita", as in 'Shri Lalita Sahasranama' ? Shri Mataji also said that> Herself is the "Reflection of the Divine Mother Within". Was Shri> Mataji referring to this relationship

--- that as Incarnation Adi> Shakti, Herself is a Reflection of Devi/Shri Lalita Within?> >> > In the actual spiritual relationship, these Names are One. But these> 'Names' also serve a purpose of distinction between the 'individual> trees' (Individual Divine Incarnations) and the 'whole forest' (the> Whole Divine Mother Who doesn't totally Incarnate Herself all at once> - which is probably not even the best way to express this!). But i> feel it is important to try and understand it anyway, to understand> this Relationship because - there could lie the difference between a> SY being able to teach about the Devi and Her Incarnation Shri Mataji,> or being able to teach "just about Her incarnation" .]> >> >> >> >> > ii) whether you are going to teach them to realize the Devi (Self or> Antaryamin) within

themselves, or realize the photo on the altar of> Her incarnation Shri Mataji;> >> > [Does not the Internal Living Photo of the Divine Mother Within> exist also? Our Spirit is made in God's Image. With Self-realisation> the Image of the Holy Spirit is awakened within us. We recognize our> Divine Mother's Image, that She is there! That's why at Guru Puja> 2008, Shri Mataji said we can give Self-realisation from our Self! If> we are aware of that Divine Photo Within, we can teach people to> realize the Devi (Self or Antaryamin). We can have them go straight to> the Source Within themselves. As Sahaja Yogis, we have the power to do> that.]> >> >> >> >> > iii) whether you are going to teach them that the Devi exists as the> Divine Feminine in all religions and holy scriptures, or that the> subtle

system of the SYSSR exists in all;> >> > [Teaching that the Devi exists as the Divine Feminine in all> religions and holy scriptures, is an essential Grounding that won't> ever be forgotten. It is a Grounding that will prepare people to meet> their Individual Mother Within. The subtle system knowledge is/was> practical knowledge to bring Shri Mataji's disciples up to par, so> they would have the working knowledge to transform themselves, before> they could help transform others. But the real transformation came> from the Individual Mother Within! Anyone that thinks that it was> their subtle system practices alone that transformed them, is> forgetting about the Divine Mother's role in their spiritual work. She> is the Author of any true Aid!]> >> >> >> >> > iv) whether you are going to teach that

"Muslims, Hindus, Christians> and all have to evolve to a higher state" during this Blossom Time, or> let them continue doubting, debating, arguing and eventually fleeing> the little known SYSSR (Sahaja Yoga Subtle System Religion);> >> > [We have to go for the Big Picture, that "Muslims, Hindus,> Christians and all have to evolve to a higher state" during this> Blossom Time. If we get caught up in the little known SYSSR, then> others will also get caught up in it, and may never come to know the> Divine Feminine within. That is why it is important to teach "first> things first". If the Divine Feminine is understood, then any subtle> system knowledge can be understood in relation to Her, as an optional> help available if needed, like medicine. i think that is the Spirit in> which Shri Mataji doled out subtle system knowledge in any case,

but> it has been made into the SYSSR (Sahaja Yoga Subtle System Religion)> of all things, which is absolutely absurd! Because it was always an> aid and not the Goal. SYs got so involved in the aids, that they lost> sight of the Goal - the Divine Mother Within!]> >> >> >> >> > v) whether you are going to teach them to meditate without ANY> external rituals as ALL religions strictly demand, or introduce them> to the 1001 rituals of the SYSSR;> >> > [Jagbir, which rituals are you referring to? Are you referring to> the Kundalini Awakening Guided Meditation? What about the Bandhan?> What about Balancing one's energy? Are you saying these are not> needed? i thought these basics were needed. They were really helpful> for me, is what i am saying. i don't quite understand not to use "ANY"> rituals. Even the

strict religions all have a modicum of rituals. Or> are you saying that is what is needed to reach people in some> particularly strict religions that would not accept any rituals> whatsoever that they are not familiar with? So, that for Hindus, a> modicum of basic rituals/subtle system knowledge would be OK, but for> Christians, for example, it would require simply closing one's eyes,> and meditating within, without an external photo, candle, or incense.]> >> >> >> >> > vi) whether you are going to tell them to keep on meditating while> learning from www.adishakti. org on the unity and synthesis of all> religions, prophets and holy scriptures, or the unity of all SYs and> their collectives against external criticism from www.sahajayoga. org> and the internet;> >> > [Yes, that is without a doubt necessary, to

have people meditating> while learning from www.adishakti. org and the synthesis of all> religions, prophets and holy scriptures.]> >> >> >> >> > vii) whether you are going to teach about how the corrupted> religions have been restored back to their original purity by the Devi> and Her incarnation, or remain silent on how that purity is now being> again corrupted by those in charge of the SY organization;> >> > [Yes, it is important to teach about how the corrupted religions> have been restored back to their original purity by the Devi and Her> incarnation, and we must not remain silent on how that purity has been> again corrupted by those in charge of the SY organisation. ]> >> >> >> >> > viii) whether you are going to teach about how to be truthful,> dharmic

and in vidya right from the start, or to be dishonest,> adharmic and in avidya from the beginning;> >> > [Yes, that is very important to teach about how to be truthful,> dharmic and in vidya right from the start!]> >> >> >> >> > ix) whether you are going to teach yourself to attain moksa by> unconditionally following the Devi and Her incarnation Shri Mataji, or> condemn yourself yet again into the whirlpool of rebirths by preaching> others about the SYSSR.> >> > [The choice would of course have to teach oneself to attain moksha> by unconditionally following the Devi and Her incarnation Shri Mataji> - not the avidya of the SYSSR.]> >> >> >> >> > x) whether you are going to teach them to be their own gurus by> forming a new group based on all the

above guidelines, or invite them> back to the SYSSR meditation groups/collectives that 99.99 have> consistently always fled for more than three decades;> >> > [Yes, this is a new opportunity to guide others into the Sahaja Yoga> that Shri Mataji taught, and not the SYSSR from which so many have> fled over the decades.]> >> >> >> >> > > The above applies to all who worship the Devi within and follow Her> > > incarnation, Shri Mataji, without. If you cannot be honest and> > > upfront to others, it is better you not incur the penalty of> > > rebirth. You will never ever liberate yourself and enter the> > > Kingdom of God by deliberately misleading humanity. SSSYR SYs claim> > > others are false gurus. Are they any better?> > >> > > But for me SYs are

worse because unlike them, false gurus teach out> > > of ignorance. Unlike SYs, false gurus also teach out of a genuine> > > desire to be truthful and conscientious towards fellow human beings.> >>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, " Violet "

<violetubb wrote:

>

> Dear Jagbir,

>

> i have one more point to make. Is what you are saying a case

of " Knowledge of the Devi alone, liberates " ? If we have knowledge of

the Devi Within, our relationship with Her alone, will liberate us.

Correct?! That is my experience. The subtle system work helped me,

but the Devi alone liberated me.

>

> violet

>

 

The subtle system is but the first few steps that commenced this 1000

mile spiritual journey towards Self-realization. After the first mile

you should have forgotten it. If you still have not i doubt you

actually walked a mile. But if you insist you did then i am sure you

lost your way, and need to get your bearings and change direction to

reach that first milestone.

 

>

>

> , " Violet " <violetubb@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Jagbir,

> >

> > Re Point v) appended...

> >

> > ....Or are you giving a guideline for a New Organisation, in which

> we need to be more 'Standard' in the way we operate. i know the Devi

> can liberate us without any rituals. That we can just turn to Her

> Within. Are you suggesting we turn right away from all rituals, as

an

> organisation, so nobody need be turned off by any rituals

whatsoever?

> Do you believe the SYSSR has so spoiled Shri Mataji's teachings that

> we really need to go in the opposite direction, and have no rituals

> whatsoever? i know this is a somewhat contentious issue, but it

would

> be good to get your take on this. Do you believe people can have

their

> spiritual liberation without any ritual help, whatsoever? That is

the

> main point, i would say.

> >

> > warmest regards,

> >

> > violet

> >

> >

> >

> > v) whether you are going to teach them to meditate without ANY

> external rituals as ALL religions strictly demand, or introduce them

> to the 1001 rituals of the SYSSR;

> >

> > [Jagbir, which rituals are you referring to? Are you referring to

> the Kundalini Awakening Guided Meditation? What about the Bandhan?

> What about Balancing one's energy? Are you saying these are not

> needed? i thought these basics were needed. They were really helpful

> for me, is what i am saying. i don't quite understand not to

use " ANY "

> rituals. Even the strict religions all have a modicum of rituals. Or

> are you saying that is what is needed to reach people in some

> particularly strict religions that would not accept any rituals

> whatsoever that they are not familiar with? So, that for Hindus, a

> modicum of basic rituals/subtle system knowledge would be OK, but

for

> Christians, for example, it would require simply closing one's eyes,

> and meditating within, without an external photo, candle, or

incense.]

> >

> >

> > , " Violet "

<violetubb@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Jagbir and all,

> > >

> > > i would like to thank you for the 'The future failure/success

of SY

> > will depend on the following' article. i would like to make some

> > comments and ask for some clarifications on these, please:

> > >

> > > The future failure/success of SY will depend on the following:

> > >

> > > i) whether you are going to teach them about the Devi and Her

> > incarnation Shri Mataji, or just Her incarnation;

> > >

> > > [Jagbir, i remember Shri Mataji stating that Herself incarnated

to

> > introduce us to our " Individual Mother Within " . Is that Individual

> > Mother Within " the Devi? " Is that Individual Mother Within " Shri

> > Lalita " , as in 'Shri Lalita Sahasranama'? Shri Mataji also said

that

> > Herself is the " Reflection of the Divine Mother Within " . Was Shri

> > Mataji referring to this relationship --- that as Incarnation Adi

> > Shakti, Herself is a Reflection of Devi/Shri Lalita Within?

> > >

> > > In the actual spiritual relationship, these Names are One. But

these

> > 'Names' also serve a purpose of distinction between

the 'individual

> > trees' (Individual Divine Incarnations) and the 'whole forest'

(the

> > Whole Divine Mother Who doesn't totally Incarnate Herself all at

once

> > - which is probably not even the best way to express this!). But i

> > feel it is important to try and understand it anyway, to

understand

> > this Relationship because - there could lie the difference

between a

> > SY being able to teach about the Devi and Her Incarnation Shri

Mataji,

> > or being able to teach " just about Her incarnation " .]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ii) whether you are going to teach them to realize the Devi

(Self or

> > Antaryamin) within themselves, or realize the photo on the altar

of

> > Her incarnation Shri Mataji;

> > >

> > > [Does not the Internal Living Photo of the Divine Mother Within

> > exist also? Our Spirit is made in God's Image. With Self-

realisation

> > the Image of the Holy Spirit is awakened within us. We recognize

our

> > Divine Mother's Image, that She is there! That's why at Guru Puja

> > 2008, Shri Mataji said we can give Self-realisation from our

Self! If

> > we are aware of that Divine Photo Within, we can teach people to

> > realize the Devi (Self or Antaryamin). We can have them go

straight to

> > the Source Within themselves. As Sahaja Yogis, we have the power

to do

> > that.]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > iii) whether you are going to teach them that the Devi exists

as the

> > Divine Feminine in all religions and holy scriptures, or that the

> > subtle system of the SYSSR exists in all;

> > >

> > > [Teaching that the Devi exists as the Divine Feminine in all

> > religions and holy scriptures, is an essential Grounding that

won't

> > ever be forgotten. It is a Grounding that will prepare people to

meet

> > their Individual Mother Within. The subtle system knowledge is/was

> > practical knowledge to bring Shri Mataji's disciples up to par, so

> > they would have the working knowledge to transform themselves,

before

> > they could help transform others. But the real transformation came

> > from the Individual Mother Within! Anyone that thinks that it was

> > their subtle system practices alone that transformed them, is

> > forgetting about the Divine Mother's role in their spiritual

work. She

> > is the Author of any true Aid!]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > iv) whether you are going to teach that " Muslims, Hindus,

Christians

> > and all have to evolve to a higher state " during this Blossom

Time, or

> > let them continue doubting, debating, arguing and eventually

fleeing

> > the little known SYSSR (Sahaja Yoga Subtle System Religion);

> > >

> > > [We have to go for the Big Picture, that " Muslims, Hindus,

> > Christians and all have to evolve to a higher state " during this

> > Blossom Time. If we get caught up in the little known SYSSR, then

> > others will also get caught up in it, and may never come to know

the

> > Divine Feminine within. That is why it is important to

teach " first

> > things first " . If the Divine Feminine is understood, then any

subtle

> > system knowledge can be understood in relation to Her, as an

optional

> > help available if needed, like medicine. i think that is the

Spirit in

> > which Shri Mataji doled out subtle system knowledge in any case,

but

> > it has been made into the SYSSR (Sahaja Yoga Subtle System

Religion)

> > of all things, which is absolutely absurd! Because it was always

an

> > aid and not the Goal. SYs got so involved in the aids, that they

lost

> > sight of the Goal - the Divine Mother Within!]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > v) whether you are going to teach them to meditate without ANY

> > external rituals as ALL religions strictly demand, or introduce

them

> > to the 1001 rituals of the SYSSR;

> > >

> > > [Jagbir, which rituals are you referring to? Are you referring

to

> > the Kundalini Awakening Guided Meditation? What about the Bandhan?

> > What about Balancing one's energy? Are you saying these are not

> > needed? i thought these basics were needed. They were really

helpful

> > for me, is what i am saying. i don't quite understand not to

use " ANY "

> > rituals. Even the strict religions all have a modicum of rituals.

Or

> > are you saying that is what is needed to reach people in some

> > particularly strict religions that would not accept any rituals

> > whatsoever that they are not familiar with? So, that for Hindus, a

> > modicum of basic rituals/subtle system knowledge would be OK, but

for

> > Christians, for example, it would require simply closing one's

eyes,

> > and meditating within, without an external photo, candle, or

incense.]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > vi) whether you are going to tell them to keep on meditating

while

> > learning from www.adishakti.org on the unity and synthesis of all

> > religions, prophets and holy scriptures, or the unity of all SYs

and

> > their collectives against external criticism from

www.sahajayoga.org

> > and the internet;

> > >

> > > [Yes, that is without a doubt necessary, to have people

meditating

> > while learning from www.adishakti.org and the synthesis of all

> > religions, prophets and holy scriptures.]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > vii) whether you are going to teach about how the corrupted

> > religions have been restored back to their original purity by the

Devi

> > and Her incarnation, or remain silent on how that purity is now

being

> > again corrupted by those in charge of the SY organization;

> > >

> > > [Yes, it is important to teach about how the corrupted religions

> > have been restored back to their original purity by the Devi and

Her

> > incarnation, and we must not remain silent on how that purity has

been

> > again corrupted by those in charge of the SY organisation.]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > viii) whether you are going to teach about how to be truthful,

> > dharmic and in vidya right from the start, or to be dishonest,

> > adharmic and in avidya from the beginning;

> > >

> > > [Yes, that is very important to teach about how to be truthful,

> > dharmic and in vidya right from the start!]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ix) whether you are going to teach yourself to attain moksa by

> > unconditionally following the Devi and Her incarnation Shri

Mataji, or

> > condemn yourself yet again into the whirlpool of rebirths by

preaching

> > others about the SYSSR.

> > >

> > > [The choice would of course have to teach oneself to attain

moksha

> > by unconditionally following the Devi and Her incarnation Shri

Mataji

> > - not the avidya of the SYSSR.]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > x) whether you are going to teach them to be their own gurus by

> > forming a new group based on all the above guidelines, or invite

them

> > back to the SYSSR meditation groups/collectives that 99.99 have

> > consistently always fled for more than three decades;

> > >

> > > [Yes, this is a new opportunity to guide others into the Sahaja

Yoga

> > that Shri Mataji taught, and not the SYSSR from which so many have

> > fled over the decades.]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > > The above applies to all who worship the Devi within and

follow Her

> > > > incarnation, Shri Mataji, without. If you cannot be honest and

> > > > upfront to others, it is better you not incur the penalty of

> > > > rebirth. You will never ever liberate yourself and enter the

> > > > Kingdom of God by deliberately misleading humanity. SSSYR SYs

claim

> > > > others are false gurus. Are they any better?

> > > >

> > > > But for me SYs are worse because unlike them, false gurus

teach out

> > > > of ignorance. Unlike SYs, false gurus also teach out of a

genuine

> > > > desire to be truthful and conscientious towards fellow human

beings.

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

, " jagbir singh "

<adishakti_org wrote:

>

> , " Violet "

> <violetubb@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Jagbir,

> >

> > Re Point v) appended...

> >

> > ....Or are you giving a guideline for a New Organisation, in which

> we need to be more 'Standard' in the way we operate. i know the Devi

> can liberate us without any rituals. That we can just turn to Her

> Within. Are you suggesting we turn right away from all rituals, as an

> organisation, so nobody need be turned off by any rituals whatsoever?

> Do you believe the SYSSR has so spoiled Shri Mataji's teachings that

> we really need to go in the opposite direction, and have no rituals

> whatsoever? i know this is a somewhat contentious issue, but it would

> be good to get your take on this. Do you believe people can have

> their spiritual liberation without any ritual help, whatsoever? That

> is the main point, i would say.

> >

> > warmest regards,

> >

> > violet

> >

> >

>

> Yes Violet, the " Devi can liberate us without any rituals " . i do not

> see any need for the 1001 SYSSR rituals, most of which are known

> human innovations and corruption of Her teachings. Even a single

> ritual is one too many. Accept one and you have to include the other

> 1000.

 

[i want to thank you Jagbir, for stating upfront/loud and clear that the Devi

can liberate without any rituals being needed whatsoever. Even though we know

these things, it is good to hear them said. i wonder how many SYs can believe

that, seeing they are so indoctrinated in the subtle system. Yet it is true that

the Devi can liberate from within.

 

Like all other SYs, i started out with the rituals taught in Sahaja Yoga, but i

always put my attention on the Holy Spirit/Divine Within. When She came to my

rescue through personal experience, i realized it is not about ritual, but about

relationship.

 

i understand your point, that if you accept one ritual, then you have to accept

the next and the next one, and before long, you have rituals a mile-long!]

 

 

> And i am not giving a guideline for a new organization, just reminding

> all that the nature of the Divine is primal, profound Samaadhi:

>

> Arbad narbad dhun dhookaaraa.

> For endless eons, there was only utter darkness.

> Dharan na gagnaa hukam apaaraa.

> There was no earth or sky; there was only the infinite Command of

His Hukam.

> Naa din rain na chand na sooraj sunn samaaDh lagaa-idaa.||1||

> There was no day or night, no moon or sun; God sat in primal,

profound Samaadhi. ||1||

>

> http://www.aykaa-mayee.org/

 

[That is very beautiful.]

 

 

> and Silence on Self is that primal, profound Samaadhi! Adding even a

> single ritual, dogma, dress code, dietary rule, religious verse, or

> anything for that matter is corruption of a most sacred and secret

> Truth.

 

[Yes.]

 

 

> > v) whether you are going to teach them to meditate without ANY

> external rituals as ALL religions strictly demand, or introduce them

> to the 1001 rituals of the SYSSR;

> >

> > [Jagbir, which rituals are you referring to? Are you referring to

> the Kundalini Awakening Guided Meditation? What about the Bandhan?

> What about Balancing one's energy? Are you saying these are not

> needed? i thought these basics were needed. They were really helpful

> for me, is what i am saying. i don't quite understand not to

> use " ANY " rituals. Even the strict religions all have a modicum of

> rituals. Or are you saying that is what is needed to reach people in

> some particularly strict religions that would not accept any rituals

> whatsoever that they are not familiar with? So, that for Hindus, a

> modicum of basic rituals/subtle system knowledge would be OK, but for

> > Christians, for example, it would require simply closing one's eyes,

> and meditating within, without an external photo, candle, or incense.]

> >

>

> Once the Kundalini awakening takes place there is no need for rituals.

> Shri Mataji has said that the Mother Kundalini takes care of all our

> problems. So why must we innovate?

>

> Balancing one's energy with the hand is a placebo, no matter how you

> argue it. The same goes for all rituals using lemons, chillies,

> coconuts, candles, strings, paper and what not. No one seems to

> understand that it is the individual's attention/awareness/

> consciousness that brings results/heals. As mentioned earlier, adding

> even a single ritual, dogma, dress code, dietary rule, religious

> verse, or anything for that matter is corruption of a most sacred and

> secret Truth.

>

> So if you introduce ritual #1, which worked for you, then another

> will introduce ritual #2 that gave good results. Then you cannot stop

> others from ritual #3, #4, #5 ........... #1001, and they will

> recommend you follow too.

>

> And what may work for you may not work for many, and vice versa.

> Sahaja Yoga is full of such inconsistencies. And when you have 1001

> rituals it is a madhouse, to say the least. But despite all these

> 1001 rituals many SYs have all trypes of catches, fears, phobias,

> imbalances. The SYSSR has more holes in it than Swiss cheese. It is

> better you flee and regain your sanity and then work towards Self-

> realization.

>

> Today i do not even raise my kundalini or say a single mantra to

> meditate as i feel the cool breeze 24/7. i am grateful that i left SY

> and can now advance and make progress towards that primal, profound

> Samaadhi. i have never felt so free, free from all types of rules and

> doctrines that the vast majority of the religious faithful blindly

> follow in ignorance.

>

> Violet, you said that " Even the strict religions all have a modicum

> of rituals " . The reply is: " Yes, even the strict religions all have a

> modicum of rituals but centuries of dogma and indoctrination of these

> institutions have made their followers fools and slaves of ignorance. "

> What is the difference between physical and mental rituals? You should

> know that physical rituals are much easier to give up in order to

> bring about healing and enlightenment.

>

> >

> >

> > , " Violet " <violetubb@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Jagbir and all,

> > >

> > > i would like to thank you for the 'The future failure/success of

> SY

> > will depend on the following' article. i would like to make some

> > comments and ask for some clarifications on these, please:

> > >

> > > The future failure/success of SY will depend on the following:

> > >

> > > i) whether you are going to teach them about the Devi and Her

> > incarnation Shri Mataji, or just Her incarnation;

> > >

> > > [Jagbir, i remember Shri Mataji stating that Herself incarnated to

> > introduce us to our " Individual Mother Within " . Is that Individual

> > Mother Within " the Devi? " Is that Individual Mother Within " Shri

> > Lalita " , as in 'Shri Lalita Sahasranama'? Shri Mataji also said that

> > Herself is the " Reflection of the Divine Mother Within " . Was Shri

> > Mataji referring to this relationship --- that as Incarnation Adi

> > Shakti, Herself is a Reflection of Devi/Shri Lalita Within?

> > >

> > > In the actual spiritual relationship, these Names are One. But

> these

> > 'Names' also serve a purpose of distinction between the 'individual

> > trees' (Individual Divine Incarnations) and the 'whole forest' (the

> > Whole Divine Mother Who doesn't totally Incarnate Herself all at

> once

> > - which is probably not even the best way to express this!). But i

> > feel it is important to try and understand it anyway, to understand

> > this Relationship because - there could lie the difference between a

> > SY being able to teach about the Devi and Her Incarnation Shri

> Mataji,

> > or being able to teach " just about Her incarnation " .]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ii) whether you are going to teach them to realize the Devi (Self

> or

> > Antaryamin) within themselves, or realize the photo on the altar of

> > Her incarnation Shri Mataji;

> > >

> > > [Does not the Internal Living Photo of the Divine Mother Within

> > exist also? Our Spirit is made in God's Image. With Self-realisation

> > the Image of the Holy Spirit is awakened within us. We recognize our

> > Divine Mother's Image, that She is there! That's why at Guru Puja

> > 2008, Shri Mataji said we can give Self-realisation from our Self!

> If

> > we are aware of that Divine Photo Within, we can teach people to

> > realize the Devi (Self or Antaryamin). We can have them go straight

> to

> > the Source Within themselves. As Sahaja Yogis, we have the power to

> do

> > that.]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > iii) whether you are going to teach them that the Devi exists as

> the

> > Divine Feminine in all religions and holy scriptures, or that the

> > subtle system of the SYSSR exists in all;

> > >

> > > [Teaching that the Devi exists as the Divine Feminine in all

> > religions and holy scriptures, is an essential Grounding that won't

> > ever be forgotten. It is a Grounding that will prepare people to

> meet

> > their Individual Mother Within. The subtle system knowledge is/was

> > practical knowledge to bring Shri Mataji's disciples up to par, so

> > they would have the working knowledge to transform themselves,

> before

> > they could help transform others. But the real transformation came

> > from the Individual Mother Within! Anyone that thinks that it was

> > their subtle system practices alone that transformed them, is

> > forgetting about the Divine Mother's role in their spiritual work.

> She

> > is the Author of any true Aid!]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > iv) whether you are going to teach that " Muslims, Hindus,

> Christians

> > and all have to evolve to a higher state " during this Blossom Time,

> or

> > let them continue doubting, debating, arguing and eventually fleeing

> > the little known SYSSR (Sahaja Yoga Subtle System Religion);

> > >

> > > [We have to go for the Big Picture, that " Muslims, Hindus,

> > Christians and all have to evolve to a higher state " during this

> > Blossom Time. If we get caught up in the little known SYSSR, then

> > others will also get caught up in it, and may never come to know the

> > Divine Feminine within. That is why it is important to teach " first

> > things first " . If the Divine Feminine is understood, then any subtle

> > system knowledge can be understood in relation to Her, as an

> optional

> > help available if needed, like medicine. i think that is the Spirit

> in

> > which Shri Mataji doled out subtle system knowledge in any case, but

> > it has been made into the SYSSR (Sahaja Yoga Subtle System Religion)

> > of all things, which is absolutely absurd! Because it was always an

> > aid and not the Goal. SYs got so involved in the aids, that they

> lost

> > sight of the Goal - the Divine Mother Within!]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > v) whether you are going to teach them to meditate without ANY

> > external rituals as ALL religions strictly demand, or introduce them

> > to the 1001 rituals of the SYSSR;

> > >

> > > [Jagbir, which rituals are you referring to? Are you referring to

> > the Kundalini Awakening Guided Meditation? What about the Bandhan?

> > What about Balancing one's energy? Are you saying these are not

> > needed? i thought these basics were needed. They were really helpful

> > for me, is what i am saying. i don't quite understand not to

> use " ANY "

> > rituals. Even the strict religions all have a modicum of rituals. Or

> > are you saying that is what is needed to reach people in some

> > particularly strict religions that would not accept any rituals

> > whatsoever that they are not familiar with? So, that for Hindus, a

> > modicum of basic rituals/subtle system knowledge would be OK, but

> for

> > Christians, for example, it would require simply closing one's eyes,

> > and meditating within, without an external photo, candle, or

> incense.]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > vi) whether you are going to tell them to keep on meditating while

> > learning from www.adishakti.org on the unity and synthesis of all

> > religions, prophets and holy scriptures, or the unity of all SYs and

> > their collectives against external criticism from www.sahajayoga.org

> > and the internet;

> > >

> > > [Yes, that is without a doubt necessary, to have people meditating

> > while learning from www.adishakti.org and the synthesis of all

> > religions, prophets and holy scriptures.]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > vii) whether you are going to teach about how the corrupted

> > religions have been restored back to their original purity by the

> Devi

> > and Her incarnation, or remain silent on how that purity is now

> being

> > again corrupted by those in charge of the SY organization;

> > >

> > > [Yes, it is important to teach about how the corrupted religions

> > have been restored back to their original purity by the Devi and Her

> > incarnation, and we must not remain silent on how that purity has

> been

> > again corrupted by those in charge of the SY organisation.]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > viii) whether you are going to teach about how to be truthful,

> > dharmic and in vidya right from the start, or to be dishonest,

> > adharmic and in avidya from the beginning;

> > >

> > > [Yes, that is very important to teach about how to be truthful,

> > dharmic and in vidya right from the start!]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ix) whether you are going to teach yourself to attain moksa by

> > unconditionally following the Devi and Her incarnation Shri Mataji,

> or

> > condemn yourself yet again into the whirlpool of rebirths by

> preaching

> > others about the SYSSR.

> > >

> > > [The choice would of course have to teach oneself to attain moksha

> > by unconditionally following the Devi and Her incarnation Shri

> Mataji

> > - not the avidya of the SYSSR.]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > x) whether you are going to teach them to be their own gurus by

> > forming a new group based on all the above guidelines, or invite

> them

> > back to the SYSSR meditation groups/collectives that 99.99 have

> > consistently always fled for more than three decades;

> > >

> > > [Yes, this is a new opportunity to guide others into the Sahaja

> Yoga

> > that Shri Mataji taught, and not the SYSSR from which so many have

> > fled over the decades.]

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > > The above applies to all who worship the Devi within and follow

> Her

> > > > incarnation, Shri Mataji, without. If you cannot be honest and

> > > > upfront to others, it is better you not incur the penalty of

> > > > rebirth. You will never ever liberate yourself and enter the

> > > > Kingdom of God by deliberately misleading humanity. SSSYR SYs

> claim

> > > > others are false gurus. Are they any better?

> > > >

> > > > But for me SYs are worse because unlike them, false gurus teach

> out

> > > > of ignorance. Unlike SYs, false gurus also teach out of a

> genuine

> > > > desire to be truthful and conscientious towards fellow human

> beings.

> > >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does this work Jagbir? Are not going against Sri Mataji by your

views because Sri Mataji has been encouraging all these things you

say we don't need? Are you suggesting she has not been accurate with

everything perhaps? and some things we have to dissect for ourselves?

 

But you are right though. Most people I have ever brought to the

programs do not really want to go to pujas or take part in the

external rituals- first reactions from people are usually along the

lines of 'is this really necessary?'. They kind of just go along with

it after some sweet talking - and eventually without knowing it

become brainwashed into it I suspect- I know this might sound harsh

to some people - just a viewpoint to consider. Even me, I felt I was

expected to go with the rest of the sheep otherwise I would not

really be welcome at the meetings. I am not saying there is no self

gain by these rituals etc but I think they are just keeping sahaja

yoga a small sect - problem is, when you're in there living it,

ofcourse you don't see it as a sect. I still believe sahaja yoga can

be extremely unhealthy for some peoples minds because of all the

things Jagbir has mentioned. My first few weeks were great until all

the other stuff got introduced to me gradually confusing me. Few more

months down the line I started to feel disturbed. The superstition in

sahaj needs to be eradicated quickly if we are to attract more people

and stop them from deteriorating psychologically. Some people at

these meetings carry on like they are qualified mental health

practitioners or doctors haha.....and the scary part is they don't

even realize it half the time. They issue out all kinds of advice to

people with serious conditions they themselves have never

experienced.. leading them on to believe their ridiculous treatments

will make a major difference...even cure you. It is a struggle for

them to recommend a doctor or someone who doesn't have a cool breeze

emitting from somewhere. Better to take advice from someone with some

cool breeze and no qualifications than someone with no cool breeze

but a lifetime of professional medical experience.

 

Right, better foot-soak with some salt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...