Guest guest Posted November 2, 2008 Report Share Posted November 2, 2008 Dear All, We concluded Part 8 with: (p.248) " This comes very near to the doctrine of Ibn al Arabi. He expresses almost the same view in his teaching that everything in creation and everything in man exists eternally in God. Creation comes forth eternally in God as God, without any difference, and then it comes forth differentiated in time and space. Originally it is God in God. So the image of God exists eternally in God, in its archetype. Ruysbroeck says, " God utters himself in the Spirit eternally without intermediary and in this Word he utters himself and all things. " In the utterance of the Word which comes forth from the Father eternally the whole creation, the whole of humanity, you and I and all created things, are present. Everything and all beings are present in that eternal Word, eternally present with God, in God and as God. We are all participating in the Infinite at that stage, beyond creation. This is what is meant by our uncreated being in the Godhead. Eckhart had the same idea but he expressed it less carefully while Ruysbroeck puts it extremely well. He speaks of " a waylessness and darkness in which we never find ourselves again in a creaturely way. " We lose ourselves in that divine darkness. And he goes on to speak of God, this " God beyond " , as it were, as " a simple nudity, an incomprehensible light " . (p.249) The one who has reached this point " finds himself and feels himself to be that light, gazing at that light, by that light, in that light. Here one has entered totally into the Godhead and one knows in the light and by the light. This is exactly how it is put in the Upanishads and in the 'Bhagavad Gita', where it is said that one knows the 'atman', through the 'atman'. The 'atman' cannot be known by any other means. God is grasped and held through God. " A New Vision of Reality (Western Science, Eastern Mysticism and Christian Faith) Chapter 11, P.248-249 Here now, is Part 9 - the conclusion to 'Christian Mysticism in Relation to Eastern Mysticism'. Enjoy, violet Christian Mysticism in Relation to Eastern Mysticism - Part 9 (p.249) Ruysbroeck then asserts that we have our eternal archetype in God which comes forth forever from the Father in the Son and returns in the Spirit. But then we have a created existence as we come forth from God in creation, in time, and in our created existence we reflect an eternal archetype. In the depth of our being that eternal archetype is always being reflected. So each of us has that reflection of God in the depth of our being, and that is the true image of God in us. So he says, " All creatures come forth from the Son eternally and they are known as other, yet not other in all ways because all in God is God. " So all creation comes forth in God and is other than God in one sense, but yet is not other for it is still God in God. There is no created difference at this point. " Our created being abides in the eternal essence and is one with it in its essential existence. " Our created being has its eternal being in God, which is exactly the doctrine of the most profound thinkers in Hinduism, Buddhism and Islam. It is important to realise that this is not simply the teaching of a particular person but of a universal tradition. When the human mind reaches a certain point of experience it comes to this same understanding and this is what constitutes the perennial philosophy, the universal wisdom. " It has an eternal immanence in the divine essence without distinction and an eternal outflowing in the Son in distinction. " It exists without distinction eternally in the essence and then it comes forth eternally in the Son from the Father in distinction. (p.250) So Ruysbroeck can say, " The image of God is that in which God reflects himself and all things, and in this image all creatures have an eternal life outside themselves, in their eternal archetypes. " All creatures have this eternal archetype in God, beyond themselves, and we come forth from the eternal ground of the Father in an unmanifest state into manifestation in the Son. In the eternal ground of the Father we are unmanifest and in the Son we come forth into manifestation. " And in the divine light they see that as regards their essential essence they are that Ground from which the brightness shines forth and they go forth from themselves above reason in an intuitive gazing, and are transfigured into the light which they see and which they are, and they behold God in all things without distinction in a simple seeing, in the divine brightness. " This is a coming back to the original unity. Everything comes forth from that original unity, from the Father, in the Son and the Spirit. We come forth in time and space with all our differences, all our conflicts, with all the sin and the evil of the world, and then we are drawn back by the love of God. Love is drawing us out of our sin and out of the limitations of this world to the inner image, to the archetype within, and then in that image, in Spirit, we return through the Son to the Father and we reach unity again. We know ourselves in God, as God. Ruysbroeck goes on to say that " the wisdom with all that is in it turns towards the Father, the ground, and then there comes forth the Holy Spirit and this mutual love enfolds and drenches both in action and fruition, the Father and Son and all which lives in both. " The Son comes forth from the Father as his eternal wisdom and then there is this return in the Spirit in the mutual love which enfolds them in one. So within the Godhead there is the distinction, the coming forth, and there is the return. That is eternal, not, as it were, spread out in time but it is one act, both coming forth and returning. (p.251) " In this return in love in the divine ground every divine way and activity and all the attributes of the persons are swallowed up in the rich compass of the essential unity. All the divine means and all conditions, and all living images which are reflected in the mirror of truth, lapse in the one-fold and ineffable waylessness, beyond reason. Here there is naught but eternal rest in the fruitive embrace of an outpouring love. This is the dark silence in which all lovers lose themselves. " This is the rhythm of the universe. Everything comes forth eternally from the Father, the Ground of Being, in the Son, the Word and Wisdom of the Father and returns in the Spirit. The Father, the ground, is pouring itself out eternally in the Son, knowing itself and expressing itself in the Son, and the Father and the Son return to one another, unite with one another, eternally in the embrace of the Holy spirit. We are all enfolded in that love. One particular passage in Ruysbroeck brings this out well. " All things are loved anew by the Father and the Son in the outpouring of the Holy Spirit and this is the active meeting of the Father and the Son in which we are lovingly embraced by the Holy Spirit in eternal love. " We are taken up in this communion of love in the Spirit. " This " , he says, " swallows up every divine way and activity and all the attributes of the persons within the rich compass of the essential unity. To this the persons of the Trinity and all that lives in God must give place. " He goes on, " The abyss itself may not be comprehended unless by the essential unity, so the persons and all that lives in God must give place, for here there is naught else but an eternal rest in the fruitive embrace of an outpouring love. And this is that wayless being which all inferior spirits have chosen above all other good things. " This is the climax of Christian mysticism, as of all mysticism, where there is a return to the original unity of being beyond all distinctions and yet embracing all distinctions. To conclude I would like to make some points about Christian mysticism as a whole. (p.252) First of all it embraces all creation, matter, life, time, history, man, woman. The whole of humanity is taken up in Christ into the life of the Godhead and is restored to unity. The whole creation is gathered into one and in and through Christ the Word, all things and all people return to the Father, in the Spirit. That is the total reintegration of everything, the recapitulation, or gathering into one, of all things. That comes at the end of the world. Secondly, creation is not a fall and it is not God. Creation is often said to be a fall. Ken Wilber, for instance, in his very remarkable book 'Up from Eden', holds that ultimately creation is a fall from God, but in the Christian view this is not so. The world is created by God as the sphere in which human experience can be worked out, which is essentially God giving himself to the world in love and drawing the world back to himself in love. That is the essence of creation. So rather than a fall, it is an outpouring of love. Sin comes in, of course, and brings disintegration and death but the grace of God comes to restore it and bring us back to God. Thirdly, the spirit of man is a capacity for God. It is not God. My 'atman', myself, is not God, but rather it is a capacity for God which can be filled by God and can be transformed into God and this is a gift of pure grace. Fourthly, this capacity is fully realised in Jesus in the resurrection, and so made effective in the Church and the sacraments. In Jesus this outpouring of the Spirit of God was complete. In him, as St Paul says, " dwelt the fullness of the Godhead bodily. " [8] In him human nature was totally transformed, and in and through him we return to the Father. The resurrection and the ascension release a power in the universe so that now it is working throughout the whole creation and the whole of humanity to bring back creation and humanity into life in God. The Church is the sphere in which this divine power is at work, particularly through the sacraments. (p.253) The sacraments constitute the means by which this power, released at the resurrection, is made present to us, first in baptism, then in confirmation and then renewed each day in the Eucharist. In this way, through the Church, we are united as members of the mystical body of Christ and in that mystical body of Christ we return to the Father. Fifthly, the human person is not lost in the divine but enjoys perfect oneness in love. Again and again the tendency is to lose the person in the Ultimate. In both Hinduism and Buddhism this tendency is always at work, so that ultimately there is no individual left and everything dissolves in the pure oneness of being. But in the Christian mystical understanding each person is unique. Each is a unique expression of God, a unique manifestation of the divine, and each is in all and all are in each. There is a total transparency. All are one in God and one in each other. But we are not lost in this oneness; we are found in our total being. " He who will lose his life shall find it. " [9] When we lose ourselves totally in that abyss of love, we find ourselves. Perhaps the fundamental difference is this: that the heart of Christian mysticism is a mystery of love, whereas both in Hinduism and in Buddhism it is primarily a transformation of consciousness. 'Brahman' is 'saccidananda', being, consciousness and bliss. It is not specifically love. Love is included, and was marvellously developed as 'bhakti', but this is not so central either in Hinduism or in Buddhism, whereas the essence of the Christian experience is an experience of love, not primarily of consciousness or of knowledge, though these, of course, are included, and love is self-communication. The nature of love is such that we become persons by loving. We have a capacity to transcend ourselves in love, to go out of ourselves and to experience one another in love, and grow as we communicate in love. It is all a matter of interpersonal relationship. In this understanding the basic need of human existence is growth in interpersonal relationships, in love, and that is so basic that we are called into being by love. (p.254) The love which is given to mother, father, husband, wife, children and friends, all this is simply a created manifestation of a love which created us in the beginning and is drawing us to itself. All created love is a manifestation of the uncreated love from which we come and to which we are moving. In this we do not lose ourselves, just as in a human relationship of love you do not lose yourself. If you love someone you become one with him or her and they become one with you, but you do not cease to be yourself. If that happened it would no longer be love. So it is a communion of love, an experience of oneness in love, and that is the end and meaning of life. This interrelationship in love is the reflection of the life of the Godhead, where the Father and the Son give themselves totally in love and are united in the Spirit in an unfathomable unity. So the interpersonal relationships within the Trinity are the model and exemplar of all interpersonal relationships on earth and ultimately also of all interrelationships in the whole creation. We saw in chapter one how the contemporary physicist describes the universe as a complex web of interdependent relationships. Everything is interdependent and interrelated on the physical level, on the psychological level and finally on the spiritual level; and the Trinity, as far as can be expressed in words, is the exemplar of all interrelationship and the unity of all being in love. A New Vision of Reality (Western Science, Eastern Mysticism and Christian Faith) Chapter 11, P.249-254 Bede Griffiths Templegate Publishers - Springfield, Illinois ISBN 0-87243-180-0 Notes: [8] Colossians 2:9 [9] Matthew 10:39 ff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.