Guest guest Posted March 8, 2009 Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 Papal Sin Structures of Deceit by Garry Wills Publisher: Doubleday; 1st edition (June 6, 2000) ISBN-10: 0385494106 ISBN-13: 978-0385494106 Hardcover: Jun 2000, 326 pages. From the Jacket " The truth, we are told, will make us free. It is time to free Catholics, lay as well as clerical, from the structures of deceit that are our subtle modern form of papal sin. Paler, subtler, less dramatic than the sins castigated by Orcagna or Dante, these are the quiet sins of intellectual betrayal. " --from the Introduction From Pulitzer Prize-winning author Garry Wills comes an assured, acutely insightful--and occasionally stinging--critique of the Catholic Church and its hierarchy from the nineteenth century to the present. Papal Sin in the past was blatant, as Catholics themselves realized when they painted popes roasting in hell on their own church walls. Surely, the great abuses of the past--the nepotism, murders, and wars of conquest--no longer prevail; yet, the sin of the modern papacy, as revealed by Garry Wills in his penetrating new book, is every bit as real, though less obvious than the old sins. Wills describes a papacy that seems steadfastly unwilling to face the truth about itself, its past, and its relations with others. The refusal of the authorities of the Church to be honest about its teachings has needlessly exacerbated original mistakes. Even when the Vatican has tried to tell the truth--e.g., about Catholics and the Holocaust--it has ended up resorting to historical distortions and evasions. The same is true when the papacy has attempted to deal with its record of discrimination against women, or with its unbelievable assertion that " natural law " dictates its sexual code. Though the blithe disregard of some Catholics for papal directives has occasionally been attributed to mere hedonism or willfulness, it actually reflects a failure, after long trying on their part, to find a credible level of honesty in the official positions adopted by modern popes. On many issues outside the realm of revealed doctrine, the papacy has made itself unbelievable even to the well-disposed laity. The resulting distrust is in fact a neglected reason for the shortage of priests. Entirely aside from the public uproar over celibacy, potential clergy have proven unwilling to put themselves in a position that supports dishonest teachings. Wills traces the rise of the papacy's stubborn resistance to the truth, beginning with the challenges posed in the nineteenth century by science, democracy, scriptural scholarship, and rigorous history. The legacy of that resistance, despite the brief flare of John XXIII's papacy and some good initiatives in the 1960s by the Second Vatican Council (later baffled), is still strong in the Vatican. Finally Wills reminds the reader of the positive potential of the Church by turning to some great truth tellers of the Catholic tradition--St. Augustine, John Henry Newman, John Acton, and John XXIII. In them, Wills shows that the righteous path can still be taken, if only the Vatican will muster the courage to speak even embarrassing truths in the name of Truth itself. www.bookbrowse.com/reviews/index.cfm?book_number=577 -------- Garry Wills, Papal Sin: Structures of Deceit The Ecumenical Review, July, 2002 by John Jay Hughes London, Darton, Longman & 2000, 334pp., 12.95 [pounds sterling]. Written by a Pulitzer prize-winning Catholic author whose previous books deal with topics ranging from Richard Nixon and John Wayne to Abraham Lincoln and St Augustine, this book is a publisher's dream. Wills takes aim at liberal Catholicism's usual suspects: Catholic antisemitism, papal infallibility, clerical celibacy, church teaching about the indissolubility of marriage and the attempt to mitigate this through the annulment process, the rejection of women priests, the condemnation of contraception, abortion, and homosexual acts. The book will put heart into the dwindling ranks of liberal Catholics, scandalize the pious, and confirm the familiar indictment of the church by secularists who hold that there is no such thing as truth, only different opinions. " Catholics have fallen out of the healthy old habit " , Wills writes at the outset, " of reminding each other how sinful popes can be. " In the middle ages Dante performed this service for his fellow Catholics, castigating popes for greed, venality, and the quest for power and wealth. The sins of modern popes, Wills contends, are more subtle: continuing to defend positions that are no longer tenable, because admitting change could be tantamount to conceding that the church, which claims to be the divinely guided teacher of truth, had been wrong. " The irony is that the very attempt to prove that the church has never changed leads to innovating arguments, to modern adjustments or additions, that just show how ill they accord with the monument they are trying to shore up. When ancient props for certain moral stands are removed, or crumble of themselves, the thing they upheld is not allowed to fall with them. New jerry-built contrivances are shoved under them to keep them in place ... a rickety makeshift that tries to pose as an eternal truth " (p.7f.). Responsible for this " structure of deceit " , Wills charges, are the modern popes and their sycophantic helpers: " not men who lack intelligence themselves, though it sometimes seems that they believe all others do " (p.6). Let no one suppose that Wills is not skilled at polemic. The Ecumenical Review July, 2002 -------- Publisher Notes Wills describes a papacy that seems steadfastly unwilling to face the truth about itself, its past, and its relations with others. the refusal of the authorities of the church to admit that they could err or do wrong to others has needlessly exacerbated their original mistakes. Even when the Vatican has tried to tell the truth--e.g., about Catholics and the Holocaust--it has ended up resorting to distortion, evasion, and blindness. The same is true when the papacy has attempted to deal with its record of discrimination against women, or with its unbelievable assertion that " natural " law dictates it sexual code....Wills traces the rise of the papacy's stubborn resistance to the truth, beginning with the challenges posed in the nineteenth century by science, democracy, scriptural scholarship, and rigorous history. The legacy of that resistance, despite the brief flare of John XXIII's papacy and some good initiatives in the 1960s by the Second Vatican Council (later baffled), is still strong in the Vatican. -------- Amazon.com Review " Catholics have fallen out of the healthy old habit of reminding each other how sinful Popes can be, " notes Garry Wills in the introduction to Papal Sin: Structures of Deceit. In his book, Wills alludes occasionally to the most egregious papal scoundrels: " In the tenth century a dissolute teenager could be elected Pope (John XII) because of his family connections and die a decade later in the bed of a married woman. " But most of the author's energy is devoted to an incisive analysis of recent popes' doctrinal pronouncements, which Wills believes have eroded the Church's moral authority and contributed to the drastic decline in vocations to the priesthood today. " The arguments for much of what passes as current church doctrine are so intellectually contemptible that mere self-respect forbids a man to voice them as his own, " Wills writes. " The cartoon version of natural law used to argue against contraception, or artificial insemination, or masturbation, would make a sophomore blush. The attempt to whitewash past attitudes toward Jews is so dishonest in its use of historical evidence that a man condemns himself in his own eyes if he tries to claim that he agrees with it. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.