Guest guest Posted March 23, 2009 Report Share Posted March 23, 2009 “Whoever achieves gnosis becomes " no longer a Christian, but a Christ. " We can see, then, that such gnosticism was more than a protest movement against orthodox Christianity. Gnosticism also included a religious perspective that implicitly opposed the development of the kind of institution that became the early catholic church. Those who expected to " become Christ " themselves were not likely to recognize the institutional structures of the church—its bishops, priest, creed, canon, or ritual—as bearing ultimate authority. This religious perspective differentiates gnosticism not only from orthodoxy, but also, for all the similarities, from psychotherapy, for most members of the psychotherapeutic profession follow Freud in refusing to attribute real existence to the figments of imagination. They do not regard their attempt to discover what is within the psyche as equivalent to discovering the secrets of the universe. But many gnostics, like many artists, search for interior self-knowledge as the key to understanding universal truths — " who are we, where we came from., where we go. " According to the Book of Thomas the Contender, " whoever has not known himself has known nothing, but he who has known himself has at the same time already achieved knowledge about the depths of all things. " This conviction—that whoever explores human experience simultaneously discovers divine reality—is one of the elements that marks gnosticism as a distinctly religious movement. Simon Magus, Hippolytus reports, claimed that each human being is a dwelling place, " and that in him dwells an infinite power ... the root of the universe " ... How is one to realize that potential? Many of the gnostic sources cited so far contain only aphorisms directing the disciple to search for knowledge, but refrain from telling anyone how to search. " Elaine Pagels, The Gnostic Gospels House Inc. New York, 1989, p. 134 " Enlightenment occurs when we awaken to the truth that everything is higher consciousness, or Spirit. This realization, however, is not a mere intellectual exercise. Rather, it is a bodily and mental transformation that shatters all our intellectual presumptions about it. It sweeps us up and grasps and transfigures our entire body-mind. What gets blown to pieces is the idea that we are different from that Reality — that we are an I, an ego, a finite personality. In our realization of higher consciousness, we do not merely conceive it, or speculate about it, or even intuit it. We are it. Or to put it differently, it is all there is. For the ego-personality, our ordinary self, this is a rather frightening prospect. Indeed, for that realization to occur, we must pass through and beyond the fear of our " own " death, the disappearance of the ego-personality to which we are so attached. On the other side, however, infinite bliss, delight, beatitude, and unqualified love awaits us. However, these are not distinct qualities but merely different ways of describing what is essentially indescribable... In other words, enlightenment is not a new state that is called into existence by our efforts. It is not even a state that is external to ourselves and can be attained. The enlightened condition is always true of us, but there are veils in our mind that prevent us from recognizing this truth. These veils are energetic blockages that have karmic causes. As we purify ourselves through spiritual discipline, these inner obstructions are gradually removed, and then, one day, we suddenly face the inner sanctum of the universal Mind, which is our own nature and the inherent nature of everything else. " Georg Feuerstein, Lucid Waking Inner Traditions International, 1997, p. 128-43 ISBN-10: 0892816139 ISBN-13: 978-0892816132 " The Reality, considered as the innermost Self of any particular creature or object, is called the Atman — as we have already seen. When the Reality is spoken of in its universal aspect, it is called Brahman. This may sound confusing, at first, to Western students, but the concept should not be strange to them. Christian terminology employs two phrases — God immanent and God transcendent — which makes a similar distinction. Again and again, in Hindu and Christian literature, we find this great paradox restated — that God is both within and without, instantly present and infinitely everywhere, the dweller in the atom and the abode of all things. But this is the same Reality, the same God head, seen in its two relations to the cosmos. These relations are described by two different words simply in order to help us think about them. They imply no kind of duality. Atman and Brahman are one. " Swami Prabhavananda and C. Isherwood The Yoga Aphorisms of Patanjali, Penguin Books, Inc., 1969, p. 23.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.