Journal of Buddhist Ethics Review of Brian Victoria's Zen War Stories

[Guest guest]

Journal of Buddhist Ethics Review of Brian Victoria's Zen War Stories

Reviewed by David Loy

Professor, Faculty of International Studies

Bunkyo University, Chigasaki, Japan

loy

 

Zen War Stories is a sequel to Victoria's Zen at War (1997), which explored the

relationship between institutional Buddhism (especially Zen) and Japanese

militarism before and during World War II. The first book discomfited many

Western students of Zen by showing how almost all Japanese Zen masters and

institutions had been fervent supporters of colonialism and the Pacific War.

This book supplements the earlier one. There are actually not many battlefield

tales, as Victoria acknowledges in the preface, but the additional historical

material he has dug up is almost as important and uncomfortable for Western

Buddhists.

 

Chapter One summarizes an interview with Nakajima Genjo (1915-2000), who had

retired as head of the Hakuin branch of Rinzai Zen. After an early kensho or

enlightenment experience, he voluntarily enlisted in the Imperial Navy at age 21

and served for ten years. Victoria gives us an abridged version of his

reminiscences, which end by emphasizing how stupid (because badly conducted) the

Pacific War was and by apologizing to his comrades who fell in battle—but, as

Victoria points out, not to the victims of Japanese aggression. Nakajima

acknowledges hearing claims of a great massacre in Nanjing, yet remains firmly

convinced that no such thing ever happened. " It was wartime, however, so there

may have been a little trouble with the women " (7).

 

Chapter Two discusses how much the Imperial military was influenced by Zen

monastic life. Even their mess kits were modelled after monk's eating bowls,

although they became unpopular because made of aluminum, which the troops found

too cold and metallic. The importance of modern weaponry was de-emphasized in

favor of seishin kyoiku " spiritual education, " including a soldier's willingness

to sacrifice himself in attacking. This turned out to be a fatal mistake, given

the mechanical nature of modern warfare, especially American air superiority.

 

Chapter Three and a number of subsequent chapters highlight the role played by

certain Zen masters and their disciples in domestic assassinations. These were

prominent in the early 1930s and contributed to developing the emperor-centered,

military-dominated society that Japan would become by the end of that decade.

For example, Lt. Col. Aizawa Saburo, a student of the Soto sect master Fukusada

Mugai, assassinated Major General Nagata Tetsuzan in July 1935. At his trial he

defended his actions as Zen-like: " I was in an absolute sphere, so there was

neither affirmation nor negation, neither good nor evil " (33). His teacher Mugai

defended him in the same way: " There is no doubt that, given Aizawa's purity of

character and self-sacrificing devotion, he felt compelled to do what he did in

the face of present-day corruption " (34). Aizawa was nevertheless convicted and

executed in 1936.

 

Inoue Nissho (1886-1967) was another Zen-trained ultra-nationalist who led the

" Blood Oath Corps. " In one notorious incident that group intended to assassinate

twenty people and managed to kill two important figures, a former finance

minister and the managing director of the Mitsui zaibatsu. During his 1933 court

trial Inoue was asked about his " Zen-like " manner of thinking: " It is more

correct to say that I have no systematized ideas. I transcend reason and act

completely upon intuition " (215). His actions were defended in court by the

well-known Zen master Yamamoto Gempo, his spiritual father, who declared: " In

light of the events that have befallen our nation of late, there is, apart from

those who are selfish and evil, no fair and upright person who would criticize

the accused for their actions " (216). Inoue was more fortunate than Aizawa: he

was sentenced to fifteen years in prison but was released in 1940 and became an

advisor to the Prime Minister.

 

Chapter Four focuses on #333;mori Sogen (1904-94), a Zen master skilled at

martial arts and well known both inside and outside Japan. Victoria describes

him as " The Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde of Zen. " Zen at War discussed his close

association with the Toyama family, responsible for intimidation, blackmail and

assassination. After the war Sogen established Zen centers in the United States,

became the president of Hanazono University in Kyoto and the only Zen master to

have his own 15-line entry in the 1991 Dictionary of the Right-Wing in Japan for

his active encouragement of fascism at home and imperialism abroad. Although

lauded by some as " the greatest Zen master of modern times, " he always had an

uncritical attitude towards the emperor and remained unreformed after the war.

Victoria's detailed critique of Sogen's own rationalizations of his wartime

conduct shows them to be a combination of lies and half-truths.

 

Chapter Five addresses the militaristic and antisemitic writings of Yasutani

Haku'un, well-known in the West as one of the founders of the Sanbo Kyodan

school. Victoria summarizes his 1943 book Dogen Zenji to Shshogi, " Master Dogen

and the Treatise on Practice and Enlightenment, " which supports " reverently

assisting in the holy enterprise of bringing the eight corners of the world

under one roof, " i.e., Japanese imperialism. Dogen's Dharma, we read, is

characterized from beginning to end by its emphasis on the great duty of

reverence for the emperor. And what about the Buddhist precept of not taking

life? Those who understand the spirit of the Mahayana precepts must be ready to

kill: " of course one should kill, killing as many as possible. One should,

fighting hard, kill everyone in the enemy army. The reason for this is that in

order to carry compassion and filial obedience through to perfection it is

necessary to assist good and punish evil. However, in killing one should swallow

one's tears, bearing in mind the truth of killing yet not killing " (72).

 

This sophistry was complemented by Yasutani's attack on modern education as a

corruption of the pure Japanese spirit, because it makes " shallow,

cosmopolitan-minded persons " (86). Might some university courses in the

humanities have made Yasutani's own views less shallow? Despite the absence of

Jewish people in Japan, his book included strong antisemitic remarks about

" scheming Jews " and their " demonic views, " mainly because Jewish-rooted ideas

about liberty and democracy were examples of aku byodo " evil equality, " which

contradicted the proper social relations between spiritual superiors and

inferiors. Like many others, Yasutani understood the Japanese spirit as superior

to the liberalism and individualism of the West, which affirmed life but were

unable to affirm death. In developing this point, however, perhaps Victoria goes

too far in seeing a " disturbing parallel " between the Nazi Holocaust and the

Rape of Nanjing, arguing that the journey from demonized other to massacre is

very short. However brutal the Japanese treatment of China, it was not an

attempt at genocide.

 

Chapter Seven discusses the official Field Service Code that urged troops never

to surrender. It was written by Imamura Hitoshi, a brilliant military strategist

and Zen practitioner, so we are not surprised to learn that the major influence

on it was the Zen view of life and death. " That which penetrates life and death

is the lofty spirit of self-sacrifice for the public good. Transcending life and

death, earnestly rush forward to accomplish your duty...what is to be esteemed

is duty, not life. One should take as one's ideal the realization that even

though the body perish, one lives on in the eternal life of the nation through

the oneness of life and death " (118). Both the Rinzai and Soto sects promoted

the Code, which was also applied to laypeople and was used to inculcate

fanatical resistance to the expected Allied invasion. Victoria is horrified by

this and concludes: " In infusing the suicidal Japanese military spirit,

especially when extended to civilians, with the power of religious belief,

Japan's wartime Zen leaders revealed themselves to be thoroughly and completely

morally bankrupt " (144, his emphasis).

 

One might respond that this represents only the military's understanding of Zen,

but he gives a wartime quotation from D. T. Suzuki that is uncomfortably

similar: " It is the warrior spirit that can be rightly said to represent the

Japanese people. I believe that if the warrior spirit, in its purity, were to be

imbibed by all classes in Japan - whether government officials, military men,

industrialists, or intellectuals - then most of the problems presently troubling

us would be swept away as if at the stroke of a sword " (119, from " The Japanese

People's View of Life and Death " [1942]). However, the shock and suffering of

defeat led to a different emphasis in Suzuki's lectures to the emperor eight

months after surrender: " The ego of the nation-state is a form of

self-attachment. Wherever the self exists there is always fighting " (202).

 

Chapter Eight discusses the duties of Buddhist military chaplains, who

emphasized devotion to the emperor and accepting one's karma. Chapter Nine

translates the confessions of one such chaplain, the Nichiren priest Fukushima

Nichi'i (1909-87). It is a gruesome account of how local people in northern

China were treated and killed, with no evident pangs of conscience despite—or

because of?—the author's fervent faith in the Lotus Sutra. Unfortunately, the

chaplains' emphasis on selflessness and karma worked to encourage such war

atrocities: " If my life was not important, an enemy's life became inevitably

much less important.... This philosophy led us to look down on the enemy and

eventually to the mass murder and ill treatment of captives " (Azuma, 146).

 

The main focus of Chapter Ten, " Buddhism—The Last Refuge of War Criminals, " is

the way imprisoned wartime leaders used Buddhism to justify their behavior and

destiny. I found this section somewhat tenuous, however, in its attempts to link

these particular militarists with Buddhism, as if their personal

rationalizations constituted a kind of guilt by association for Japanese

Buddhism. Victoria adds a more interesting post-surrender story about Emperor

Hirohito, whose advisors debated whether he should try to escape retribution by

retiring to become a Buddhist priest—shades of earlier emperors! But the Allies

never suggested he step down or accept any responsibility for his wartime

actions, and in the end his role escaped scrutiny due to the political

expediencies of the Cold War.

 

A postscript happily acknowledges that in September 2001 the Myoshinji Branch

assembly of the Rinzai Zen sect issued a proclamation finally acknowledging its

past transgressions in not maintaining a resolute anti-war stance and instead

cooperating with the war effort. (A follow-up statement by branch administrators

acknowledged that Zen at War had been a catalyst for this development.) Also, in

spring 2001 Kubota Jiun of the Sanbo Kyodan apologized for wartime " errant words

and actions " of Yasutani Haku'un. Victoria concludes by hoping that his books

will be catalysts for thoughtful adherents of all faiths to look critically at

the relationship between their own faith and state-initiated warfare.

 

Reading Victoria's new book in late 2003, as an American reflecting on recent

and past U.S. policy in the Middle East, I cannot help wondering about the

comparable role of Christianity in the West. In criticizing the nationalistic

role of Zen, are we holding Japanese Buddhism to higher standards than we have

upheld ourselves? To say that Buddhism was distorted by Japanese society: in the

end, does that mean anything more than that Buddhism too is a religion practiced

by human beings? One of Victoria's epigraphs quotes Robert Bellah: " Every

religion seeks to proclaim a truth which transcends the world, but is enmeshed

in the very world it desires to transcend. Every religion seeks to remake the

world in its own image, but it is always to some extent remade in the image of

the world. " His epilogue quotes an equally prescient passage from Reinhold

Niebuhr: " The nation is always endowed with an aura of the sacred, which is one

reason why religions, which claim universality, are so easily captured and tamed

by national sentiment, religion and patriotism merging in the process.... The

best means of harmonizing the claim to universality with the unique and relative

life of the nation, as revealed in moments of crisis, is to claim general and

universally valid objectives for the nation " (229).

 

Such universalism is everywhere more often espoused than practiced, but Niebuhr

does touch on what is unique about Japan, among the major players on the world

stage today: it never had an Axial revolution, which means, among other things,

that ethical universalism never really took hold. What is good and what is bad

remained (and largely remains) relative to the perspective of one's own group.

The importation of Buddhism did not universalize Japanese ethics; on the

contrary, Japanese culture tended to subordinate and " particularize " Buddhism.

As a consequence, Buddhist selflessness came to be expressed as complete

devotion to one's superiors, and according to the director of the Institute of

Zen Studies at Hanazono University, " Loyalty to one's teacher and the tradition

is more important than the Buddha and the Dharma " (91, quoting Toga

Masataka)—something the Buddha himself never taught.

 

This also explains the emphasis of so many Buddhist teachers on the religious

superiority of Japan, and its future role leading the world to a spiritual

renaissance. Nichiren believed that " Japan was destined to become the wellspring

of true faith for the entire world. " The Rinzai master Ean (1225-77) declared

that " To the end of the end of the last generation will this land of Ours

surpass all other lands. " Even Hakuin shared this ethnocentrism: " though Our

Land is situated out of the Way, everlasting is its Imperial Rule, noble are its

people. Thus Our Land surpasses others by far..... This Land of Ours is pure and

divine " (123). Countless other examples could be cited.

 

The lack of a transcendental Axial perspective also gets at what is so

attractive about Japanese culture, including its religions: Japanese people seem

to be nondual with their world in a way that is very attractive to alienated

Westerners. Yet that does not escape the problem. Of course we want to hold

Japanese Zen to a higher standard than Christianity, because many of us have

given up our Christian or Jewish roots in favor of what we want to see as a

superior religion. We have learned to look upon our Japanese teachers as

superior spiritual beings, so we are shocked by the stories Victoria tells.

Buddhist enlightenment involves a wisdom that overcomes delusion and ego, but

Victoria rubs our noses in the collective delusions and group " wego " that

Japanese Buddhism supported; living as an enlightened being involves manifesting

compassion to all sentient beings, but Japanese Buddhism rationalized

nationalistic aggression and the killing of many innocent people. Does this mean

that our Japanese spiritual models were not really enlightened, after all? That

is a painful thought, so we are tempted to kill the messenger—and Victoria's

sometimes emotive prose can make him an easy target.

 

It is possible that Victoria's books have caused or will cause some Western Zen

students to abandon their practice, but there is another alternative. He

challenges us to mature in our appropriation of the tradition, especially our

understanding what it means to be enlightened. The anti-intellectual emphasis of

Japanese Zen—on an intuition that " transcends " good and evil—works to valorize

the prevailing ideology, but is that emphasis more Japanese than Buddhist? It is

easier to see the difference from outside, although American down-to-earth

pragmatism shares a similar anti-intellectual bias against abstraction. Perhaps

a genuine Buddhist awakening involves, not eliminating concepts, but liberating

them? Thoughts too come from the mind. For enlightened wisdom to manifest most

brightly in our benighted times, our meditation practices need to be

supplemented with a deeper knowledge and understanding of the past as well as

the present world situation. In remembering the sorry history that Victoria's

books reveal, there arises the possibility of a modern Buddhism that might avoid

those mistakes in the future.

 

Journal of Buddhist Ethics Review of Brian Victoria's Zen War Stories