Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Naisthika Brahmacarya and Family Life from Hindu Dharma

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

In the past, some students continued to reside with their guru

without performing the samavartana. Even after his passing, they

remained brahmacarins and remained so all their life.

 

Our dharma takes into account the natural urges of man. The general

rule is that, on his return home from the gurukula, the student must

marry and settle down. It is difficult to go against the natural

urges. But going along with nature does not mean being swept away in

the flow of urges. After all the goal of all our efforts is reaching

the other shore-that is release from the worldly existence. The

householder must lead a life of dharma with his wife. But later he

must become a forest recluse first and then, renouncing everything, a

sannyasin. This path to asceticism through stages is based on the

fact that curbing the natural instincts is likely to be harmful. A

person who decides in his youth to become a naisthika brahmacarin

(lifelong student-bachelor)may later succumb to his natural passions.

This would be an offence against the asrama code of conduct and

therefore sinful. As a householder he is not guilty of any offence if

he goes by his natural urges within the constraints of dharma.

 

There are exceptions to any rule. Those who have firmness and

maturity of mind and strength of character obtained from the

samskaras preformed in an earlier birth may become lifelong

brahmacarins. We have the example of Samarta Ramadasa who lived more

than 300 years ago. It was he who inspired Sivaji to uphold our

dharma against the onslaught of Islam. Ramadasa, the naisthika

brahmacarin, personified one aspect of Hanuman.

 

Sri Sankara Bhagavatpada was an incarnation of Paramesvara and his

mission was re-establishment of the Vedic dharma. He went directly

from the brahmacarya to the ascetic stage of life. His disciples too,

with the exception of Suresvaracarya, did the same. Sankara gave

initiation into sannyasa to Padmapada, Hastamalaka and Totaka. In the

Sankara Matha also brahmacarins are initiated into sannyasa because,

according to the rule, only such sannyasins can occupy the Pitha. All

this points to the fact that everybody need not become a householder

before donning the ascetic's garb. But it must be conceded that only

a few will have the wisdom and mellowness necessary to skip two

asramas (that of the householder and the forest recluse) to take to

sannyasa. Naisthika brahmacarins do not have to perform the following

samskaras: marriage, the five mahayajnas, the seven pakayajnas, the

seven haviryajnas and the seven somayajnas. Their antah-karana must

be sufficiently pure even without going through these rituals. So

they are exceptional cases.

 

Dahana-kriya(cremation)is the last samskara according to the sastras.

It is argued, on the basis of this, that they (the sastras)do not

enjoin all, even the aged, to take to sannyasa. If everybody were to

live through all the asramas (that of bachelor-student, householder,

forest recluse and ascetic) there would truly be no question of the

cremation rite for anybody. Are not sannyasins their attaining

siddhi, instead of being consigned to the flames? If we believe that

asceticism is only for the mature, and not even for the aged among

the rest, the above argument cannot be said to be wrong.

 

The view that cremation rite applies only to those who die too young

to become sannyasins is unfounded. Indeed not only those who die

prematurely but also the old are to be cremated [if they do not

become sannyasins]. So the inference is that sastras do accept aged

people also not taking to sannyasa.

 

A person who has the light of knowledge in him and is free from

passion must live in the forest giving up family responsibilities and

performing only Vedic rites. He must leave his children and property

behind and take only his wife with him to the forest. The wife,

however, is not meant for carnal pleasure but is a partner in the

conduct of rites involving the sacred fire-sacrifices, aupasana, etc.

This is the meaning of vanaprastha. A person qualifies for this stage

of life when he is mature enough to leave home and hearth, children

and relatives. Later he gives up the Vedic karma itself and turns his

mind exclusively to the quest of the Self. This is the time when he

enters the sannyasasrama.

 

The man who has thus separated himself from his wife and given up

Vedic works is initiated into sannyasa by his guru. He must

constantly meditate on the Paramatman and experience the Truth as an

inward reality. Also, he must have the realisation that, " That Truth

am I, all else is false play. " Then he is by himself, beyond his body

and mind, as the Ultimate Truth. This is moksa, liberation. Such a

man will continue to dwell in his body until the fruits of his past

karma are exhausted. But he will not be affected by such karma as a

sannyasin who has inward realisation. From the point of view of the

outside world he may still dwell in his body; but even in this state

he is liberated. He is now a " jivanmukta " . When the body perishes he

becomes a " videhamukta " (liberated without the body). And he himself

is now the unconditioned Ultimate Truth.

 

He who becomes a sannyasin without having lived as a householder and

he who becomes a sannyasin after doing so, performing all the forty

samskaras and acquiring all the eight Atmic qualities, becomes alike

the Ultimate Truth.

 

What is the fate of the man who does not become an ascetic but who

keeps performing, until his death, all the samskaras and cultivates

the eight Atmic qualities? He is cremated on his death, is he not?

After all, the majority of people belong to this category. What

happens to such people after their death?

 

Sankara does not state that they will dissolve in Ultimate Reality.

They do not have the intense urge, the burning desire, to grasp the

Brahman, abandoning everything. If they have the all-consuming desire

for the Truth, no force can hold them back from their quest. It is

because they do not possess such a desire that they do not obtain non-

dualistic release. However, they have faith in the sastras and

perform works according to them and contribute to the well-being of

the mankind and they are also thereby rendered pure inwardly. So,

though they are not united with the Paramatman, they go to the

presence of Isvara, Isvara who is the Paramatman with attributes

(Saguna Brahman)and is behind the affairs of the world.

 

This is called " Hiranyagarbha-sthana " and it is the same as

Brahmaloka. In this there is no inseparable dissolution in the

Paramatman, but the man who attains it remains in

bliss " experiencing " Isvara. Such a state is also to be described as

moksa. There is nothing wanting, there is no sorrow, and there is the

presence of the Lord. What more is wanted? This state is reached by

those who perform all the samskaras even though they do not become

ascetics.

 

 

But one day Isvara(the Saguna Brahman)will put a stop to the

activities of all worlds and dissolve them in the great deluge(maha-

pralaya). He will now become the Nirguna Brahman, the Paramatman

without any attributes. At this time all those who reside by his side

will unite with the Paramatman as the Paramatman, that is non-

dualistic liberation.

 

In the great deluge all creatures-even those who have not performed

any of the prescribed rituals, creatures like worms, reptiles and so

on also -will merge with the Paramatman. Then what is special about

the one who unites with the Supreme Being after having performed all

the samskaras? When the Paramatman, as the Isvara with attributes,

creates the worlds again those who do not perform the samskaras will

be born again according to the karma of their past lives. Only those

who have properly gone through the samskaras and been rendered pure

will be inseparably united with the Brahman.

 

I have come far from the subject of upanayana. I had sought an answer

to the following questions: " Can a person remain a brahmacarin all

his life? Can a brahmacarin become a sannyasin without going through

the stage of the householder? ''

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...