Guest guest Posted December 14, 2004 Report Share Posted December 14, 2004 The impersonalists often quotes from the first few chapters of Bhagavad-gita, which mainly explain about the impersonal feature of God. In this way, they try to prove that God is impersonal. However in later chapters, Krsna explains His personal features and says "I am the basis of the impersonal Brahman"(Bg 14.27). We cannot simply accept that part of the scripture we like, and reject what we don't like, and still expect to get the result. For example, a hen lays eggs with its back part and eats with its beak. A farmer may consider, "The front part of the hen is very expensive because I have to feed it. Better to cut it off." But if the head is missing there will be no eggs anymore. Similarly, if we reject the difficult part of the scriptures and obey the part we like, such an interpretation will not help us. We have to accept all the injunctions of the scripture as they are given, not only those that suit us. All the living entities are individual persons, and they are all parts and parcels of the Supreme Whole (Bg 15.7). If the parts and parcels are individual persons, the source of their emanation must not be impersonal. The impersonal idea defies common sense and observation although God has His impersonal aspects also. The impersonal brahman effulgence is one aspect of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Lord Sri Krishna, but it is only a partial representation of the Lord and is ultimately a subordinate emanation from His personal feature. The Lord has two other features known as Paramatma and Bhagavan. In His Paramatma feature the Supreme Lord exists within each and every atom of His creation and also within the hearts of every living being. In this way he pervades and supports the entire universe. This feature of the Lord is also a subordinate emanation from His eternal, original personal form. The word Bhagavan indicates the personal form of the Lord, which is the ultimate source of impersonal effulgence just like sun is the ultimate source of sunshine. This personal feature of the Lord is most sublime and therefore the Lord is known as Krishna, or He who is "all-attractive". To deny the Lord's beautiful personal form, by which He reciprocates in loving exchange with all living beings who desire His association, is insulting because it denies the Lord all of the most attractive and appealing aspects of personal existence. That form, however, is not limited as our material forms are. God has a spiritual form and from that form the whole creation, spiritual and material, is coming. Therefore Lord Brahma prays: "I worship Govinda, the primeval Lord, whose transcendental form is full of bliss, truth and substantiality and is thus full of the most dazzling splendor. Each of the limbs of that transcendental figure possesses, in Himself, the full-fledged functions of all the organs, and eternally sees, maintains and manifests the infinite universes, both spiritual and mundane". (Brahma-samhita 5.32) _____________ He whose mind is fixed on My personal form, always engaged in worshiping Me with great and transcendental faith, is considered by Me to be most perfect -Lord Krsna[bg 12.2] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.