Why India is suffering ???

[Guest guest]

Written by Shree Laxminarayan Sarma

The rabid India and Hindu hater, Winston Churchill once said, "The sun never sets on the British Empire". He said this with all the arrogance that only a European Christian can command. Responding to this, a Hindu patriot retorted, "The reason, sir, is that even God does not trust the British in the dark".

And it was precisely at the darkest hour of 12 midnight on August 15, 1947, that the British lowered the Union Jack, and the tricolor was hoisted atop the ramparts of the Red Fort in Delhi. The British quit India leaving the country in the hands of a party called the Indian National Congress led by a British educated barrister called Jawaharlal Nehru, a pucca Brown sahib bred in the finest traditions of the Macaulayan system of education imposed on India after destroying the ancient, traditional holistic Hindu educational system.

And who could have been happier than Lord Macaulay himself (had been alive at the time) to witness power passing on to a man cast in the mould that he outlined in his speech to the British Parliament on February 2, 1835 when he said, " I propose that we replace (India's) old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good, and greater than their than their own, they will lose their self esteem, their native culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation".

And thanks to atheist brown sahibs like Nehru, the British gave a parting kick to the vedic nation BhArat. They broke off almost one third of the most valuable, fertile and strategically important portions of the country and handed it over to create the Islamic state of Pakistan. A Pakistan that mercilessly butchered the Hindus living there. And those who escaped the butchery, raping and jiahdi barbarism, fled to India. At the same time, thanks to the brown sahibs in the Congress, the Muslims were allowed to stay on as Indian citizens enjoying all the rights and privileges that even Hindus did not enjoy, and eventually grew to become the blue eyed boys, an invaluable vote bank that has kept the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty in power to this day.

Hindus fought for the country's freedom. They made enormous sacrifices. They shed their life blood. On the other hand, the contribution of Muslims was insignificant. Despite this, they walked away with one third of undivided India. The contribution of Christians was zero. Almost the entire Christian community kept away from the freedom movement, if not siding with the colonizers. The Christian community was under the sway of the Church. This is best exemplified in the Malayalam novel "Kayar" where there is an episode in which a clergyman exhorts the Christians not to side with the freedom fighters because it would go against their religion. The reason? The crown adorning the head of the English monarch has a cross on it. So defying the British government would amount to dishonouring the Cross.

Freedom at midnight did not mean a Hindu raj. A Hindu raj governed on the basis of the age old Hindu ethos. The Constitution was modeled after the pattern of Christian states. Privileges unknown in the world were conferred upon the minorities. While Muslim personal laws were left intact, Hindus saw a lot of interference in their religious freedom. While Hindu temples and religious institutions came under state control, masjids and churches continued to remain free from government control. And successive Congress governments with their anti Hindu governance have ensured that Hindus have become second rate citizens in their own Hindu land.

The so called minorities have the upper hand today. Almost the entire north eastern region of the country has got Christianized. Hindus are a declining majority In rate of growth terms, Muslims are multiplying faster. This is due to their disregard for family planning. And the special privilege that enables them to have four wives. And large scale illegal infiltration of Bengladeshi Muslims. And unfettered conversions carried out by Christian missionaries.

Add to this, the jihadi terror unleashed on the Hindus by organizations like the SIMI, the church backed organizations in the North east and the naxalites across the country. Compound this with the anti Hindu foreign funded mercenary media, the persecution of Hindu saints and patriots, the showering of favours on the Muslims and Christians and you have a big question

India got freedom at midnight but it never dawned.According to English calender, the day dawns at midnight, but according to Hindu calendar , the day begins by the sunrise only. India got freedom at a bad time (Only Rakshasas and Asuras rule the night) to be ruled by bad leaders like Nehru. (Gandhiji left Congress)Neither the timing to get freedom was right nor the leaders chosen to lead the country were good.

[Guest guest]

Thanks for your revealing message on Indian freedom and Nehru.

 

Nehru was a great usurper. 12 out 13 provinces had voted for Sardar Patel to be the Prime Minister of the country by Nehru was adamant on it and Gandhi had to surrender before it. If he had been a true democrat he should have accepted the decision of the majority.

 

Nehru was also founder of a corrupt political system. When people told him that there was corruption in his own office he said that if he dismissed one and appointed another in his place he too would take his own bite. This was his approach. He should have given a strong message against corruption. But he did no and the result is that we have a system founded by coruption, run by corruption and sustained by corruption for corrupt people.

 

But teaching of English has done good to us. It helped us in making progress and match the world though to some extent. We have to learn a lot to build our own country in accordance with our basic culture.

 

If Gandhi and Nehru had accepted partition, when Jinnah had threatened civil war. Partition was more acceptable to them than civil war. We are progressing towards a situation when the Muslims will again ask for partition in north east in the near future as intelligence reports published in newspapers say.

 

A.L.Rawal--- On Mon, 21/9/09, narayana_das77 <narayanadas77 wrote:

narayana_das77 <narayanadas77 Why India is suffering ??? Date: Monday, 21 September, 2009, 12:23 PM

 

Written by Shree Laxminarayan Sarma

The rabid India and Hindu hater, Winston Churchill once said, "The sun never sets on the British Empire ". He said this with all the arrogance that only a European Christian can command. Responding to this, a Hindu patriot retorted, "The reason, sir, is that even God does not trust the British in the dark".

And it was precisely at the darkest hour of 12 midnight on August 15, 1947, that the British lowered the Union Jack, and the tricolor was hoisted atop the ramparts of the Red Fort in Delhi . The British quit India leaving the country in the hands of a party called the Indian National Congress led by a British educated barrister called Jawaharlal Nehru, a pucca Brown sahib bred in the finest traditions of the Macaulayan system of education imposed on India after destroying the ancient, traditional holistic Hindu educational system.

And who could have been happier than Lord Macaulay himself (had been alive at the time) to witness power passing on to a man cast in the mould that he outlined in his speech to the British Parliament on February 2, 1835 when he said, " I propose that we replace (India's) old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good, and greater than their than their own, they will lose their self esteem, their native culture and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation".

And thanks to atheist brown sahibs like Nehru, the British gave a parting kick to the vedic nation BhArat. They broke off almost one third of the most valuable, fertile and strategically important portions of the country and handed it over to create the Islamic state of Pakistan . A Pakistan that mercilessly butchered the Hindus living there. And those who escaped the butchery, raping and jiahdi barbarism, fled to India . At the same time, thanks to the brown sahibs in the Congress, the Muslims were allowed to stay on as Indian citizens enjoying all the rights and privileges that even Hindus did not enjoy, and eventually grew to become the blue eyed boys, an invaluable vote bank that has kept the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty in power to this day.

Hindus fought for the country's freedom. They made enormous sacrifices. They shed their life blood. On the other hand, the contribution of Muslims was insignificant. Despite this, they walked away with one third of undivided India . The contribution of Christians was zero. Almost the entire Christian community kept away from the freedom movement, if not siding with the colonizers. The Christian community was under the sway of the Church. This is best exemplified in the Malayalam novel "Kayar" where there is an episode in which a clergyman exhorts the Christians not to side with the freedom fighters because it would go against their religion. The reason? The crown adorning the head of the English monarch has a cross on it. So defying the British government would amount to dishonouring the Cross.

Freedom at midnight did not mean a Hindu raj. A Hindu raj governed on the basis of the age old Hindu ethos. The Constitution was modeled after the pattern of Christian states. Privileges unknown in the world were conferred upon the minorities. While Muslim personal laws were left intact, Hindus saw a lot of interference in their religious freedom. While Hindu temples and religious institutions came under state control, masjids and churches continued to remain free from government control. And successive Congress governments with their anti Hindu governance have ensured that Hindus have become second rate citizens in their own Hindu land.

The so called minorities have the upper hand today. Almost the entire north eastern region of the country has got Christianized. Hindus are a declining majority In rate of growth terms, Muslims are multiplying faster. This is due to their disregard for family planning. And the special privilege that enables them to have four wives. And large scale illegal infiltration of Bengladeshi Muslims. And unfettered conversions carried out by Christian missionaries.

Add to this, the jihadi terror unleashed on the Hindus by organizations like the SIMI, the church backed organizations in the North east and the naxalites across the country. Compound this with the anti Hindu foreign funded mercenary media, the persecution of Hindu saints and patriots, the showering of favours on the Muslims and Christians and you have a big question

India got freedom at midnight but it never dawned.According to English calender, the day dawns at midnight, but according to Hindu calendar , the day begins by the sunrise only. India got freedom at a bad time (Only Rakshasas and Asuras rule the night) to be ruled by bad leaders like Nehru. (Gandhiji left Congress)Neither the timing to get freedom was right nor the leaders chosen to lead the country were good.

From cricket scores to your friends. Try the India Homepage!

[Guest guest]

The incident that we are going to recount took place in mid-sixties. It took place soon after Nehru’s death when Prabhupada was still alive. I was then working in an office in downtown Broadway in New York City, not too far from Brooklyn.

by the-truth-detector  

There at Brooklyn, in Henry Street, Prabhupada used to preach in a small house, which served, at the time, as some kind of a head-quarters of the Hare Krishna people. I used to go and attend their services, now and then, mostly after office and before returning to my apartment in Flushing, Queens.

Prabhupada, whenever he visited New York at the time, put up there and his sermons were attended in the evenings by a big crowd. Not only were there the usual chantings and eventual prasadam but there was a serious question and answer period. And the subjects varied from Varnashram Dharma to Reincarnation and many other similar topics. They were naturally of great interest to the local boys and girls, men and women of America but for us Hindus of India too, the question & answer period was of extreme interest and enlightenment. Those who have had the good fortune of hearing, first hand, Prabhupada’s sermons could easily imagine how charged the discussions were.

Nehru had died only a few weeks ago in India. Ashes from his funeral pyre had been strewn from airplanes, all over India. Every-where in India, the dead man’s eulogy was being sung and this was the man who was at the root of India’s unpreparedness when China attacked, the Kashmir imbroglio, the minority (or Mohammedan) problems in India and so on. It was amazing that many of the American disciples of Prabhupada were better informed of problems in India, generated by Nehru and his incompetence. However, the man had died only recently and out of a sense of propriety, no one spoke ill of Nehru in that congregation at the time.

Then a youngman asked Prabhupada a question on re-imcarnation. Was it true that most dead were reborn and passed through the cycle of life and death once again, except those few good men who attained nirvaana and were not born again but blended with Brahman or the Almighty? If so, could Prabhupada throw some light on the current status of Nehru. Did he obtain nirvaana or was he reborn; if so what kind of a body did he receive on his next birth?

The question was a loaded one, I thought. In fact, I had the misgiving that Prabhupada might refuse to answer. But then, I was wrong. I had not yet known Prabhupada so well. He was undaunted by any question and his reply came forth instantly. Quite clearly Prabhupada knew Nehru like the palm of his hand; it was us who knew so little of the man, thanks to all the well executed suppression of details of Nehru’s private and personal life by the GoI and the Indian media. For instance, even today, some half a century after Nehru and his family took over the reins of Indian government, we do not know who indeed was Indira’s father-in-law!

Prabhupada started his discourse. He said that Nehru was re-born almost immediately after his death, a thing that happens only to the most sinful people. He did not even have a short-lived taste of heaven before he was born again. What was worse, is that Nehru was born this time in the form of a dog. He was a dog in a small town of Sweden. His master had another dog before the dog-Nehru was acquired by him and so the dog-Nehru had to share the love of his master with another dog.

Prabhupada explained that to be born as a dog, after having been born as a Kashmiri Brahmin in India, is a big fall. It indicated that Nehru had led a vile life, a very vile life, during his existence as a man in India. Also, Nehru’s hatred for anything vaishnava did not make things any easier for him.

That Nehru was a meat-eater, specially beef-eater, a regular wine-drinker, made things even worse for him. On top of that, Nehru was (a fact which we did not know then and learnt later, much later, only after having read M.O. Mathai’s treatises on Nehru; Mathai should know for he was the Catholic private secretary for Nehru for a decade or so) a notorious womanizer. It was not only Mrs. Mountbatten that he slept with on a regular basis while our jawans were dying on battle fields in the north-east and in Kashmir; he used to sleep with each and every woman he could lay his hands on. Thus, he had left a chain of bastards one of whom had been delivered in a Catholic nunnery in Bangalore. In the mean time, his sidekick, one Krishna Menon, became the Minister of Defense. First thing he did was dismantle the Ichhapore Gun Factory and turned it into a coffee making machine factory. He was a communist and he loved the Chinese more than he loved Indians.

Prabhupada was quite discreet; we know now, for he did not divulge to us at the time that Nehru finally died of syphilis (exactly like the communist leader Lenin of Russia) and not a bullet wound on the battle front. Prabhupada, however, told us in detail all the harms Nehru did to the Hindus of India, all the insults that he had heaped on them during his reign.

Nehru used to brag of his non-Hindu upbringing. He used to say openly that he was brought up as a Mohammedan, educated as a westerner; it was only by accident that he was born a Hindu. It is now known that he was born in a house in the red-light district of Allahabad, where his father Motilal used to ply a brothel-keeper’s trade. No one wants to talk of this dark side of Nehru’s upbringing. On the other hand, it is said openly, wrongly of course, that he was born in the Anand Bhavan, which was not even owned by Moti Lal at the time Nehru was born.

However, the few little details that we learnt from Prabhupada opened our eyes and I returned home very depressed. I was even more depressed to think that our people in India were singing all kinds of fulsome obituaries for this man who was worse than a traitor to the Hindus, the overwhelming majority of India. What was wrong? The next few years showed us all that was wrong! His daughter, in order to create differences between the Hindus and the Sikhs, the fighting arm of the Hindus since generations, attacked the sacred temple at Hari-Mandir Sahib in Amritsar. She had to pay for the crime with her life and event-ually, as we have all seen, our gods saw to it that the dynasty was totally destroyed for the sins of Nehru, now a dog in Sweden! -

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 7:03 PM, AMRIT LAL RAWAL <rawal_al wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thanks for your revealing message on Indian freedom and Nehru.

 

Nehru was a great usurper. 12 out 13 provinces had voted for Sardar Patel to be the Prime Minister of the country by Nehru was adamant on it and Gandhi had to surrender before it. If he had been a true democrat he should have accepted the decision of the majority.

 

Nehru was also founder of a corrupt political system. When people told him that there was corruption in his own office he said that if he dismissed one and appointed another in his place he too would take his own bite. This was his approach. He should have given a strong message against corruption. But he did no and the result is that we have a system founded by coruption, run by corruption and sustained by corruption for corrupt people.

 

But teaching of English has done good to us. It helped us in making progress and match the world though to some extent. We have to learn a lot to build our own country in accordance with our basic culture.

 

If Gandhi and Nehru had accepted partition, when Jinnah had threatened civil war. Partition was more acceptable to them than civil war. We are progressing towards a situation when the Muslims will again ask for partition in north east in the near future as intelligence reports published in newspapers say.

 

A.L.Rawal--- On Mon, 21/9/09, narayana_das77 <narayanadas77 wrote:

narayana_das77 <narayanadas77 Why India is suffering ???

Date: Monday, 21 September, 2009, 12:23 PM

 

 

Written by Shree Laxminarayan Sarma

The rabid India and Hindu hater, Winston Churchill once said, " The sun never sets on the British Empire " . He said this with all the arrogance that only a European Christian can command. Responding to this, a Hindu patriot retorted, " The reason,  sir, is that even God does not  trust the British in the dark " .

 

And it was precisely at the darkest hour of 12 midnight on August 15, 1947, that the British lowered the Union Jack,  and the tricolor was hoisted atop the ramparts of the Red Fort in Delhi .  The British quit   India leaving the country in the hands of a party called the Indian National Congress led  by a British educated barrister called Jawaharlal Nehru, a pucca Brown sahib bred in the finest traditions of the Macaulayan  system of education  imposed on India after destroying the  ancient, traditional holistic Hindu educational system.

 

And  who could have been happier than Lord Macaulay himself (had been alive at the time) to witness  power passing on to a man cast in the mould that he outlined in his speech to the British Parliament on February 2, 1835 when he said,   " I propose that we replace (India's) old and ancient education system, her culture,  for if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good, and greater than their than their own, they will lose their self esteem, their native culture  and they will become  what we  want them, a truly dominated nation " .

And thanks to atheist brown sahibs like Nehru, the British gave a parting kick to the vedic nation BhArat. They broke off almost one third of the most valuable, fertile and strategically important portions of the country and handed it over to create the Islamic state of Pakistan . A Pakistan that mercilessly butchered the Hindus living there. And those who escaped the butchery, raping and jiahdi barbarism, fled to India . At the same time, thanks to the brown sahibs in the Congress, the Muslims were allowed to stay on as Indian citizens enjoying all the rights and privileges that even Hindus did not enjoy, and eventually grew to become the blue eyed boys,  an invaluable vote bank that has kept the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty in power to this day.  Hindus fought for the country's freedom. They made enormous sacrifices. They shed their life blood. On the other hand, the contribution of Muslims was insignificant. Despite this, they walked away with one third of undivided India . The contribution of Christians was zero. Almost the entire Christian community kept away from the freedom movement, if not siding with the colonizers. The Christian community was under the sway of the Church. This is best exemplified in the Malayalam novel " Kayar " where there is an episode in which a clergyman exhorts the Christians not to side with the freedom fighters because it would go against their religion. The reason? The crown adorning the head of the English monarch has a cross on it. So defying the British government would amount to dishonouring the Cross. Freedom at midnight did not mean a Hindu raj. A Hindu raj governed on the basis of the age old Hindu ethos. The Constitution was modeled after the pattern of Christian states. Privileges unknown in the world were conferred upon the minorities. While Muslim personal laws were left intact, Hindus saw a lot of interference in their religious freedom. While Hindu temples and religious institutions came under state control, masjids and churches continued to remain free from government control. And successive Congress governments with their anti Hindu governance have ensured that Hindus have become second rate citizens in their own Hindu land.

The so called minorities have the upper hand today. Almost the entire north eastern region  of the country has  got Christianized. Hindus are a declining majority In rate of growth terms, Muslims are multiplying faster. This is due to their disregard for family planning. And the special privilege that enables them to have four wives. And large scale illegal infiltration of Bengladeshi Muslims. And unfettered conversions carried out by Christian missionaries. Add to this, the jihadi terror unleashed on the Hindus by organizations like the SIMI, the church backed organizations in the North east and the naxalites across the country. Compound this with the anti Hindu foreign funded mercenary media, the persecution of Hindu saints and patriots, the showering of favours on the Muslims and Christians and you have a big question

India got freedom at midnight but it never dawned.According to English calender, the day dawns at midnight, but according to Hindu calendar  , the day begins by the sunrise only.

India got freedom at a bad time  (Only Rakshasas and Asuras rule the night) to be ruled by bad leaders like Nehru. (Gandhiji left Congress)Neither the timing to get freedom was right nor the leaders chosen to lead the country were good.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From cricket scores to your friends. Try the India Homepage!