Guest guest Posted May 27, 2006 Report Share Posted May 27, 2006 The glory of the Lord is such that even the Vedas, which are the primary source of knowledge about Him, are not able to do full justice to His description. Desika portrays the Vedas as the bards trying to sing about His merits and he says that when they start extolling even one of His infinite auspicious attributes, they become tired. ‘ Ekaika gunapraanthe sranthaah nigamavandhinah.’ Then Desika expresses his humility by saying that under such circumstances what can those with limited intellect expect to accomplish, meaning himself. He goes on to reassure himself that the subject is sourikatha, story of Krishna, which is like nectar that will be relished even if it is told by a dull witted person. He reaffirms his position by claiming that there could be nothing wrong in following the footsteps of the great poets like Valmiki and Vyasa. Then Desika extols the kavithva saying that a kavi , poet, whose creation is full of merits such as rasa, bhaava and alamkara is akin to the creator, Brahma, in whom Sarasvathi revels. Rasa is the nine kinds of sentiment , srngara etc. bhaava here means the accompanying moods that go with each sentiment , called vibhaava, anubhaava and sanchaaribhaava and alamkara is the figure of speech. Such a poetry is like goddess Sarasvathi expressive beautiful and well adorned with ornaments. The poet who is endowed with all these skills is like Brahma associated with Sarasvathi. But should perfection be a essential characteristic in composing poetry? No, says Desika. If a talented dancer makes a slip in her performance a connoisseur will ignore it and will appreciate only the overall effect . Similarly considering the vishayagourava, the merit of the subject matter which is Bhagavatvishaya, story of the Lord, even if there may be any fault, it can be excused. So, says Desika, “I will now speak of the story of Krishna, which is the nectar emerging out of the ocean of Vyasaveda, the Mahabharatha, without any hesitancy.†What is implied here is that the most enjoyable part of Mahabharatha is the story of Krishna. Vyasaveda may also mean the Vedas, the essence of which is the Lord, as Ramanuja says in the mangala sloka of Sribhaashya, sruthi sirasi vidheepthe brahmani Srinivaase, the Lord forms the crown of the Vedas. So the story of Krishna is the sarabhootha, essence of Vedas as well as Mahabharatha which is later given by Vyasa as Bhagavathapurana like extracting the butter out of the milk of Mahabharatha. Desika calls the story of Krishna vibhudhajeevaathu, the elixir for vibhudha, devas as the incarnation took place on being entreated by the devas and the Bhoodevi. The word vibhudha also means men of wisdom of whom the story of Krishna is the paramoushadham greatest antidote for the ills of the samsara. In this context it would be interesting to note the peculiar circumstances which made Vyasa write the Bhagavatha purana. The Dasamaskandha, tenth section of Bhagavathapurana contains the story of Krishna , the subject matter of Yadhavaabhyudhaya. It seemed that after Vyasa had finished Mahabharatha and other vedantic works he became depressed for no reason. Narada came to him and told him that his feeling of depression born out of dissatisfaction was due to the fact that though he exhaustively wrote about dharma and Vedanta he did not write about the exploits and the glory of Krishna and the incarnations of the Lord which would inculcate bhakthi . Hence his heart became dry and depressed. Then Narada told him the whole Bhagavata as he had learnt from Brahma. This was the inducement for Vyasa to write the Bhagavatha purana. That is why Desika calls it vibhudhajeevaathu, the life-giving elixir. .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.