Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

[Guruvayur/Guruvayoor] Bhakthy Concept.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Hari OM!

 

Dear Sir,

 

Great artcile! bow to you because Guruvayurappan in you makes you write this.

 

In this context I remember another story of Mahabharatham, like when Krishna want to

go for sometime away from Pandavas, all the 5 brother's objects, Dharmaputra want to use his rationality to stop the Lord, Arjuna fell at Lord's feet and begged not to move away from them even though it is temprary for a few days, Bheema want to use his strength physcally! hahaha what a joke is it not. the Strength in Bheema itself is Guruvayoorappan is it not!, Sahadeva tried to use his strength in control of other's to stop Krishna, but Nakula was smiling and started meditating lovingly with all his Bhakthi.

 

 

Can you imagine what happened, Krishna was able to overcome all the 4 other Brother's except Nakula, The beloved Lord says,

 

Hey Nakula, please untie me now at least temporarily, when your love for me and the devotion for me is standing infront I cannot move an inch! So all the sincere Devotees are gifs from God himself or they are HE alone. no one else. I bow to all the great Bhaktas in this group.in the name of the Lord.

 

And another thing we have to learn from Narada Bhakthi sutras is, like, only the path of devotion never makes one to linger in their Vanity.

 

because study of Vedanta with out devotion comes as Vanity. like I heard people sounding.

 

I have finished Upanishads, almost finishig Bhagawad Geetha, and started Vashista Yoga will finish soon.... whatever it may be are all this knowledge finished your vanity the ego?? that is the question. So Bhakthi we will be always having Vinayam! all Bhagwan ntee Kripa kondu mathram. njan verum oru upakarnam mathram in his hands.

 

 

Like the flute in his hands, with 9 holes, we all humans are the flute in his hands, when he stops playing flute we are only " Oddas " no use! so enjoy the big show of Bhagwan! by holding on to him oru " Shruthi pole Bhagwan ennennum ella Bhaktharude manasillum vilayatte " ennu prarthichu kondu talkalam nirthunu.

 

 

With Love & OM!

 

Krishna Prasad

On 6/23/06, GANAPATHY RAMAN <agraman62 wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Let us carefully dive into the minds and hearts of numerous devotees,who

proclaim their devotion to God with complacency and pride.In most cases the

devotion will be found to be a bargain.God,give so much temporal benefit and the

devotee to offer his namaskarams,archanas,vazhipadus etc in return.Most people frankly declare that in case of the benefit being reaped,the devotion will be confirmed and the proposed offerings etc will be done.Is this Bhakthy?But at the same time it can't be denied this is how devotion starts,is made to start or

 

can start in the vast majority of cases.No objection can be made to rudimentary

bhakthy being so crude.But it would be pitiable indeed if bhakthy should continue to be so crude,after the early stages and days are passed.It is ok in the beginning.The child throws away its teething ring,trundle hoop and spring

 

toys,one after another.So shuld a bhaktha soon recognizes the absurdity of

resorting to God merely to pull out one's earthly chestnuts from the fire.God

is not to be bargained with and God knows what is really good for a devotee

better than the devotee.Regard for God beginning with gratitude for one or more

extraordinary acts of help must turn into Love,the love of a child to its mother

touched into sublimity by dim perception of Infinite Power,Wisdom etc in the

unseen Universal Being.Failure to advance will be not mere stagnation but

descent into lower and lower levels.

 

Let us consider the evil effects of continuous looking to God for earthly benefits.

Our longing for earthly benefits gets strengthened ie. rajas and tamas get more

and more to predominate in our nature,clouding the satwa and even temporarily

banishing it from us.The evils of tamas and rajas rise up at once.A bit of

disappointment makes us angry with God that we hv just worshipped for earthly

objects alone and we even tempt to break our idols and gods and become some type of agnostics.If we but worshipped God in the correct spirit ,nor in terms of

dictation but with humble submission,recognizing the possibility that the All-wise Mother-God might deem it better to disappoint us and make us suffer

in the present,to wipe off old karmic accounts,to develop the satwic side of our

nature and to fit us perhaps for the position decreed by Supreme Wisdom and

mercy.The Omnipotent,Omniscient and Universal Father-Mother provides for the

present and future of innumerable creatures with apparently conflicting interests

and may make use of us as His instruments or even as agents to carry out His

high decrees.It is for the devotees to submit their wills and be receptive.If we are

in this proper mood,prayers are found to be needless assertion of ego,not

promoting but retarding our real progress.

 

After the Great War of Kurukshetra Lord Krishna happened to see Kunti and asked her what boon she wanted.Kunti in her humility replied that she shuld

always be given troubles so that she could always remember Him or else she

would forget Him.Such is the real position of a bhaktha.Let us recognize that

our notions of God are really abstractions and that it is wise not to ignore and

lose the concrete manifestations of God before us in trying to clutch at

abstractions that are so elusive.We must always remember that the Creator

can't be purchased by our promises to do this and that if we get this and that

and if we think it is only obnoxious and rubbish.By that we may be able to

satisfy our ego complexioned mind but that won't hv any effect on the course

which God has decided.Only love,dedication and surrender without reservations

can fetch the ardent devotee His Grace after putting him into lot of trials and

tribulations and make him choke and if the devotion is true there be no doubt

he will be saved at the right time by the Mercy of the Creator. This is the

experience of everso many devotees in the past,present and of course the same will be in the future too.There is no incident that an ardent devotee failed to get

His mercy and Grace in times of distress.May that Bhakthy cult grow.

 

Hare Krishna,

 

agraman.

 

 

India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new

Click hereCatch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India

Click here

-- Krishna Prasad

Dare to give up the comfort of the 'known' and venture into the 'unknown' The more we know, the more we will come to realize what we do not know.If we want to achieve our true potential and live life to the fullest. As Poojya Gurudev said it, "Open your eyes. Burst your shell. Spread your wings and fly!"Swami ChinmayanandaHate not the sinner - hate the sin; and always hate the sin even with an excess of hatred. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Shri. Ganapathy Raman and others,

 

Radhe Krishna!

 

My experience and belief clearly say that one should never be complacent

with the favours we receive from the Lord. When we are alive, we

receive only temporal benefits in return to whatever prayers we make(as

believed to be), but the lasting favour is received only when we depart

from this world, when the para-purushartha of Sayujyam is conferred on

the devotee. Unfortunately, there is no means of knowing this

accomplishment and telling others about it, as once Sayujyam is reached,

he is one with the Lord, and does not get a chance to return and tell

about his experience to others..

 

The socalled trials and tribulations of life are products of our own

Karma, and not given by the Lord. The Lord gives only love and

blessings to his devotees. But for one who thinks of Him, prays to Him

all the time, the Lord is ever ready to help him. This does not mean

that one should be doing Pooja all the time, but nothing stops from

thinking of Him. An ardent Bhakta should think of Him when he eats,

walks, does his daily chores, and all the time.

 

Somebody asked a Swamiji, " Swamiji, can I smoke when I pray? " Swamiji

said, " First of all, you should not smoke, and never smoke when you pray " .

 

The next question came, " In that case, Swamiji, Smoking has become my

habit. I cannot stop it. But can I pray when I smoke? "

Swamiji was flabbergasted. He finally answered, " Son, you can think of

God all the time. Never mind what other thing you are doing. But

think of Him all the time. "

 

This night look to be a joke, but one cannot stop the mind if it thinks

of God all the time. On the contrary, the Lord will come to the rescue

in times of trouble, only if one thinks of Him all the time.. I need

not remind about " Ananyaschinthayantho mam, ye janah paryupasathe,

thesham nithyabhiyukthanam yogakshemam vahamyaham " .

 

Glory to the Lord!

Love

K.V. Gopalakrishna

 

GANAPATHY RAMAN wrote:

 

> Let us carefully dive into the minds and hearts of numerous devotees,who

> proclaim their devotion to God with complacency and pride.In most

> cases the

> devotion will be found to be a bargain.God,give so much temporal

> benefit and the

> devotee to offer his namaskarams,archanas,vazhipadus etc in

> return.Most people frankly declare that in case of the benefit being

> reaped,the devotion will be confirmed and the proposed offerings etc

> will be done.Is this Bhakthy?But at the same time it can't be denied

> this is how devotion starts,is made to start or

> can start in the vast majority of cases.No objection can be made to

> rudimentary

> bhakthy being so crude.But it would be pitiable indeed if bhakthy

> should continue to be so crude,after the early stages and days are

> passed.It is ok in the beginning.The child throws away its teething

> ring,trundle hoop and spring

> toys,one after another.So shuld a bhaktha soon recognizes the absurdity of

> resorting to God merely to pull out one's earthly chestnuts from the

> fire.God

> is not to be bargained with and God knows what is really good for a

> devotee

> better than the devotee.Regard for God beginning with gratitude for

> one or more

> extraordinary acts of help must turn into Love,the love of a child to

> its mother

> touched into sublimity by dim perception of Infinite Power,Wisdom etc

> in the

> unseen Universal Being.Failure to advance will be not mere stagnation but

> descent into lower and lower levels.

>

> Let us consider the evil effects of continuous looking to God for

> earthly benefits.

> Our longing for earthly benefits gets strengthened ie. rajas and tamas

> get more

> and more to predominate in our nature,clouding the satwa and even

> temporarily

> banishing it from us.The evils of tamas and rajas rise up at once.A bit of

> disappointment makes us angry with God that we hv just worshipped for

> earthly

> objects alone and we even tempt to break our idols and gods and become

> some type of agnostics.If we but worshipped God in the correct spirit

> ,nor in terms of

> dictation but with humble submission,recognizing the possibility that

> the All-wise Mother-God might deem it better to disappoint us and make

> us suffer

> in the present,to wipe off old karmic accounts,to develop the satwic

> side of our

> nature and to fit us perhaps for the position decreed by Supreme

> Wisdom and

> mercy.The Omnipotent,Omniscient and Universal Father-Mother provides

> for the

> present and future of innumerable creatures with apparently

> conflicting interests

> and may make use of us as His instruments or even as agents to carry

> out His

> high decrees.It is for the devotees to submit their wills and be

> receptive.If we are

> in this proper mood,prayers are found to be needless assertion of ego,not

> promoting but retarding our real progress.

>

> After the Great War of Kurukshetra Lord Krishna happened to see Kunti

> and asked her what boon she wanted.Kunti in her humility replied that

> she shuld

> always be given troubles so that she could always remember Him or else she

> would forget Him.Such is the real position of a bhaktha.Let us

> recognize that

> our notions of God are really abstractions and that it is wise not to

> ignore and

> lose the concrete manifestations of God before us in trying to clutch at

> abstractions that are so elusive.We must always remember that the Creator

> can't be purchased by our promises to do this and that if we get this

> and that

> and if we think it is only obnoxious and rubbish.By that we may be able to

> satisfy our ego complexioned mind but that won't hv any effect on the

> course

> which God has decided.Only love,dedication and surrender without

> reservations

> can fetch the ardent devotee His Grace after putting him into lot of

> trials and

> tribulations and make him choke and if the devotion is true there be

> no doubt

> he will be saved at the right time by the Mercy of the Creator. This

> is the

> experience of everso many devotees in the past,present and of course

> the same will be in the future too.There is no incident that an ardent

> devotee failed to get

> His mercy and Grace in times of distress.May that Bhakthy cult grow.

>

> Hare Krishna,

>

> agraman.

>

> ------

> India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new Click

> here

>

<http://us.rd./mail/in/mailanswersshare/*http://in.answers./>

> Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click here

>

<http://us.rd./mail/in/mailfifa/*http://in.sports./football/fo\

otball_fifa.html>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Well said Gopalakrishnan! I think that perhaps it is relevant here to examine the following sloka from Gita. Chathurvidhaa bajanthe maamjanaah sukrthino arjunaaatho jignaasurarthaartheejnaanee cha bharathrshbha Krishna says, 'Four types of devotees of noble deeds worship Me, Arjuna,the seeker after worldly possessions, the afflicted,the seeker for knowledge and the man of wisdom, O best of Bharathas A man who believes in God prays for the fulfilment of his cherished objects of the world,wealth or child and so on. When he gets them as a result of his prayer his devotion is strengthened and develops into faith.If he has not already acquired faith he will lose belief if his desire is not fulfilled.This is why we often hear the cry 'I no more believe in God,' from those who face disappointments in

life.Sugreeva and dhruva can be cited as examples of arthaarthee type of devotees, the former devoloped faith after the fulfilment of his desire while Dhruva had both faith and beliefand became a jnani later, elevated to the status of dhruva star. The second kind of devotee who seeks God as his sole refuge when in distress like Droupadi or Gajendra are aarthees with staunch faith that He alone is their saviour, which is termed as mahavisvasam ,among the five requisites of saranagathi. They do not seek Him for worldly pleasures but remain ardent devotees through out their life which alone will make them call out to Him in earnest.In normal life we do not have that faith in God eventhough we have belief in Him and therefore we suffer in consequenceHere comes the importance of the word 'sukrthinah' which Krishna uses to describe the four kinds of devotees. To think of God and yearn for His mercy requires poorvajanmapunya. There is a story to illustrate

this. A man who was a confirmed sinner was sitting on a tree and Lord Siva happened to pass that way with Parvathi. Siva told Parvathi that the man is going to fall from the tree and die since it is his fate. Parvathi, being the divine mother, took pity on the man and said that they should save him to which Siva replied that it was his karma being a sinner to die such a death.When Parvathi remonstrated with him Siva said that He will save the man if he cries out 'appa' and she should save him if he says 'amma' when he falls. Parvathi was happy without realising the real purport of Siva's words.The branch on which the man was sitting broke and he fell down crying'aiyo,' because he did not have the sukrthi to call God's name at the time of death Jignasu is one who has pure devotion and does not seek the pleasures of life nor is he worried about distress because the only thing that could cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and to

acertain extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A jignasu who has pure devotion and does not seek the pleasures of life nor is he worried about distress because the only thing that could cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and to acertain extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A jignasu loves the Lord for his own sake and seeks to acquire the jnana which the Lord Himself gives as in the case of Udhdhava or through someone as He did for Parikshit. The last but not least is the jnani who has realised the truth about the Lord like Prahlada, Narada and other sages who were both bhakthas and jnanis. Besides, Ramanuja says in his sribhashya, 'dhyAnam cha thailadhArAvath avicchinna smrthisanthAna roopam,' continous flow of remembrance like the stream of continously dropping oil. 'DhruvA smrthih ;smrthilambhe sarvagranTheenAm vipramokshah,'(Chan.7-26-2) when the constant,dhruva, remembrance, smrthih is attained all knots are rent asunder. Thus DHruvAsmrthi is prescribed as the means of liberation Saroja Ramanujam . May god bless you, Dr. Saroja Ramanujam, M.A., Ph.D, Siromani in sanskrit.

Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail Beta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Mataji,

Radhe Krishna!

 

I agree with you one hundred per cent. With due regard to what Shri

Ganapathy Raman and Krishna Prasad have said, in some cases, it is a

fact that complacency creeps in when one acquires the object he has been

longing for. This complacency makes him too jubilant, raising his ego

level so high, that he forgets for a time, that what he has acquired is

by divine grace also. I have deliberately added the word " also "

because many people think that one's hard work was responsible for his

upliftment in life, or that it was the cleverness of the doctor and the

efficacy of the medicine that has cured him. I would like to reiterate

here that hard work is definitely required to be done if one wants to

come up in life. Similarly, the doctor's experience and the efficacy

of the medicine play a very important part in curing the disease. But

all these require divine grace to have their effect. Without that, no

medicine will work, and any amount of hard work will not pay. People

have the habit of blaming God when something wrong happens without

realising that the bad that has happened is result of one's own Karma.

Let us not forget that even to think of God, His grace is required.

" Iswaranugrahad eva bhakthirbhavathi Kesave! "

 

Promising to perform a particular " vazhipadu " to God if He favours etc.,

like performing a " Tulabharam " if one gets cured of his ailment etc., is

an inferior type of Bhakti. On the face of the person's promise and

cure of the disease, it may look as though the person got cured because

of the promise made. But really speaking, it is not so. It is the

person's belief on one side and the fruits of Karma on the other cured

him. The Lord will accept anything if offered with Bhakti. But what

He wants is Bhakti and Bhakti alone.

 

Regards

KVG.

 

 

Saroja Ramanujam wrote:

 

> Well said Gopalakrishnan!

> I think that perhaps it is relevant here to examine the following

> sloka from Gita.

>

> Chathurvidhaa bajanthe maamjanaah sukrthino arjuna

> aatho jignaasurarthaartheejnaanee cha bharathrshbha

> Krishna says,

> 'Four types of devotees of noble deeds worship Me, Arjuna,the seeker

> after worldly possessions, the afflicted,the seeker for knowledge and

> the man of wisdom, O best of Bharathas A man who believes in God prays

> for the fulfilment of his cherished objects of the world,wealth or

> child and so on. When he gets them as a result of his prayer his

> devotion is strengthened and develops into faith.If he has not already

> acquired faith he will lose belief if his desire is not fulfilled.This

> is why we often hear the cry 'I no more believe in God,' from those

> who face disappointments in life.

> Sugreeva and dhruva can be cited as examples of arthaarthee type of

> devotees, the former devoloped faith after the fulfilment of his

> desire while Dhruva had both faith and beliefand became a jnani later,

> elevated to the status of dhruva star.

> The second kind of devotee who seeks God as his sole refuge when in

> distress like Droupadi or Gajendra are aarthees with staunch faith

> that He alone is their saviour, which is termed as mahavisvasam ,among

> the five requisites of saranagathi. They do not seek Him for worldly

> pleasures but remain ardent devotees through out their life which

> alone will make them call out to Him in earnest.In normal life we do

> not have that faith in God eventhough we have belief in Him and

> therefore we suffer in consequenceHere comes the importance of the

> word 'sukrthinah' which Krishna uses to describe the four kinds of

> devotees. To think of God and yearn for His mercy requires

> poorvajanmapunya. There is a story to illustrate this.

> A man who was a confirmed sinner was sitting on a tree and Lord Siva

> happened to pass that way with Parvathi. Siva told Parvathi that the

> man is going to fall from the tree and die since it is his fate.

> Parvathi, being the divine mother, took pity on the man and said that

> they should save him to which Siva replied that it was his karma being

> a sinner to die such a death.When Parvathi remonstrated with him Siva

> said that He will save the man if he cries out 'appa' and she should

> save him if he says 'amma' when he falls. Parvathi was happy without

> realising the real purport of Siva's words.The branch on which the man

> was sitting broke and he fell down crying'aiyo,' because he did not

> have the sukrthi to call God's name at the time of death

> Jignasu is one who has pure devotion and does not seek the pleasures

> of life nor is he worried about distress because the only thing that

> could cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and to

> acertain extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A

> jignasu who has pure devotion and does not seek the pleasures of life

> nor is he worried about distress because the only thing that could

> cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and to acertain

> extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A jignasu

> loves the Lord for his own sake and seeks to acquire the jnana which

> the Lord Himself gives as in the case of Udhdhava or through someone

> as He did for Parikshit.

>

> The last but not least is the jnani who has realised the truth about

> the Lord like Prahlada, Narada and other sages who were both bhakthas

> and jnanis.

>

> Besides, Ramanuja says in his sribhashya,

> 'dhyAnam cha thailadhArAvath avicchinna smrthisanthAna roopam,'

> continous flow of remembrance like the stream of continously dropping

> oil. 'DhruvA smrthih ;smrthilambhe sarvagranTheenAm

> vipramokshah,'(Chan.7-26-2) when the constant,dhruva, remembrance,

> smrthih is attained all knots are rent asunder. Thus DHruvAsmrthi is

> prescribed as the means of liberation

>

>

> Saroja Ramanujam

>

>

>

> .

>

>

>

>

> May god bless you,

>

> Dr. Saroja Ramanujam, M.A., Ph.D, Siromani in sanskrit.

>

>

> ------

>

> Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail Beta.

>

<http://us.rd./evt=40791/*http://advision.webevents./handraise\

rs>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Om Namo Narayanaya

A very good topic to discuss on this forum. Everybody should

earnestly participate...since there are bound to be various

questions coming up in our mind...one such question I have

 

It was discussed in one of the Books of AMMA that Guruvayoor does

not need any of our material offerings in cash or kind, all those

goes to the funding account. But if the below concept is followed it

would be very difficult to maintain the temple and the

infrastructure needed and the salary to be paid to various employee.

We in Kerala do not have the concept of KARSEVA as with the Sikh

community where free service is also an offering. The give and take

concept if discouraged would have far reaching consequence on the

day to day working of such institution...I have my own doubts if the

Hindu system would work purely on the Bakthi concept. Currently when

some bad time falls on us, we run to Guruvayoorappan, same way as a

child runs to his/her parents when they are in trouble or even when

they have a bad dream...but since we are not kids we feel it would

not be fair to go empty handed so promise Guruvayoorappan certain

Vazipadu....more over even the Vazipadus are classified into do this

and you get this..do that and that for good health...etc..

 

I shall be very thankful if these doubts are cleared by the good

members in our forum.

 

Narayana Narayana.....

 

Pravin

 

guruvayur , " K.V Gopalakrishna "

<gopalakrishna.kv wrote:

>

> Dear Mataji,

> Radhe Krishna!

>

> I agree with you one hundred per cent. With due regard to what

Shri

> Ganapathy Raman and Krishna Prasad have said, in some cases, it is

a

> fact that complacency creeps in when one acquires the object he

has been

> longing for. This complacency makes him too jubilant, raising

his ego

> level so high, that he forgets for a time, that what he has

acquired is

> by divine grace also. I have deliberately added the word " also "

> because many people think that one's hard work was responsible for

his

> upliftment in life, or that it was the cleverness of the doctor

and the

> efficacy of the medicine that has cured him. I would like to

reiterate

> here that hard work is definitely required to be done if one wants

to

> come up in life. Similarly, the doctor's experience and the

efficacy

> of the medicine play a very important part in curing the

disease. But

> all these require divine grace to have their effect. Without

that, no

> medicine will work, and any amount of hard work will not pay.

People

> have the habit of blaming God when something wrong happens without

> realising that the bad that has happened is result of one's own

Karma.

> Let us not forget that even to think of God, His grace is

required.

> " Iswaranugrahad eva bhakthirbhavathi Kesave! "

>

> Promising to perform a particular " vazhipadu " to God if He favours

etc.,

> like performing a " Tulabharam " if one gets cured of his ailment

etc., is

> an inferior type of Bhakti. On the face of the person's promise

and

> cure of the disease, it may look as though the person got cured

because

> of the promise made. But really speaking, it is not so. It is

the

> person's belief on one side and the fruits of Karma on the other

cured

> him. The Lord will accept anything if offered with Bhakti.

But what

> He wants is Bhakti and Bhakti alone.

>

> Regards

> KVG.

>

>

> Saroja Ramanujam wrote:

>

> > Well said Gopalakrishnan!

> > I think that perhaps it is relevant here to examine the

following

> > sloka from Gita.

> >

> > Chathurvidhaa bajanthe maamjanaah sukrthino arjuna

> > aatho jignaasurarthaartheejnaanee cha bharathrshbha

> > Krishna says,

> > 'Four types of devotees of noble deeds worship Me, Arjuna,the

seeker

> > after worldly possessions, the afflicted,the seeker for

knowledge and

> > the man of wisdom, O best of Bharathas A man who believes in God

prays

> > for the fulfilment of his cherished objects of the world,wealth

or

> > child and so on. When he gets them as a result of his prayer his

> > devotion is strengthened and develops into faith.If he has not

already

> > acquired faith he will lose belief if his desire is not

fulfilled.This

> > is why we often hear the cry 'I no more believe in God,' from

those

> > who face disappointments in life.

> > Sugreeva and dhruva can be cited as examples of arthaarthee type

of

> > devotees, the former devoloped faith after the fulfilment of his

> > desire while Dhruva had both faith and beliefand became a jnani

later,

> > elevated to the status of dhruva star.

> > The second kind of devotee who seeks God as his sole refuge when

in

> > distress like Droupadi or Gajendra are aarthees with staunch

faith

> > that He alone is their saviour, which is termed as

mahavisvasam ,among

> > the five requisites of saranagathi. They do not seek Him for

worldly

> > pleasures but remain ardent devotees through out their life

which

> > alone will make them call out to Him in earnest.In normal life

we do

> > not have that faith in God eventhough we have belief in Him and

> > therefore we suffer in consequenceHere comes the importance of

the

> > word 'sukrthinah' which Krishna uses to describe the four kinds

of

> > devotees. To think of God and yearn for His mercy requires

> > poorvajanmapunya. There is a story to illustrate this.

> > A man who was a confirmed sinner was sitting on a tree and Lord

Siva

> > happened to pass that way with Parvathi. Siva told Parvathi that

the

> > man is going to fall from the tree and die since it is his fate.

> > Parvathi, being the divine mother, took pity on the man and said

that

> > they should save him to which Siva replied that it was his karma

being

> > a sinner to die such a death.When Parvathi remonstrated with him

Siva

> > said that He will save the man if he cries out 'appa' and she

should

> > save him if he says 'amma' when he falls. Parvathi was happy

without

> > realising the real purport of Siva's words.The branch on which

the man

> > was sitting broke and he fell down crying'aiyo,' because he did

not

> > have the sukrthi to call God's name at the time of death

> > Jignasu is one who has pure devotion and does not seek the

pleasures

> > of life nor is he worried about distress because the only thing

that

> > could cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and

to

> > acertain extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of

Bhakthi. A

> > jignasu who has pure devotion and does not seek the pleasures of

life

> > nor is he worried about distress because the only thing that

could

> > cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and to

acertain

> > extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A

jignasu

> > loves the Lord for his own sake and seeks to acquire the jnana

which

> > the Lord Himself gives as in the case of Udhdhava or through

someone

> > as He did for Parikshit.

> >

> > The last but not least is the jnani who has realised the truth

about

> > the Lord like Prahlada, Narada and other sages who were both

bhakthas

> > and jnanis.

> >

> > Besides, Ramanuja says in his sribhashya,

> > 'dhyAnam cha thailadhArAvath avicchinna smrthisanthAna roopam,'

> > continous flow of remembrance like the stream of continously

dropping

> > oil. 'DhruvA smrthih ;smrthilambhe sarvagranTheenAm

> > vipramokshah,'(Chan.7-26-2) when the constant,dhruva,

remembrance,

> > smrthih is attained all knots are rent asunder. Thus

DHruvAsmrthi is

> > prescribed as the means of liberation

> >

> >

> > Saroja Ramanujam

> >

> >

> >

> > .

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > May god bless you,

> >

> > Dr. Saroja Ramanujam, M.A., Ph.D, Siromani in

sanskrit.

> >

> >

> > --------------------------------

-------

> >

> > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail Beta.

> >

<http://us.rd./evt=40791/*http://advision.webevents..co

m/handraisers>

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Pravin,

Radhe Krishna!

Your point is very valid. It is said that when one goes to see god,

children, old people and sick ones, one should not go empty-handed.

the same principle applies when one visits Guruvayoorappan also. One

can put money in the Hundi which will go for the upkeep and day to day

expenses of the temple, feeding poor devotees, and so on and so forth.

One can perform vazhipadus as token of one's Bhakti which the Lord will

be only too pleased to accept. Unbelievers do ask questions like " God

does not accept your gifts physically, nor does He take any neivedyam

you offer, so why take to Him? " This is no argument. Because,

although God has not physically eaten all the Prasadam, He has blessed

it, and any devotee who eats that Prasadam will certainly be

benefitted. There are, stories in our mythology that He has physically

accepted and eaten the neivedyam when the Unni Namboodiri who was too

innocent cried.

 

Similary, one may argue that God is the giver to all. He is the

creator. How can one offer to Him, the same things He has created ?

One should remember that it is not just the material value of the

offering that counts; it is the Bhakti which goes along with that. Has

He not said in Bhagavad gita to Arjuna and in Bhagavatam to Uddhava and

Kuchela, " Patram Pushpam Phalam Toyam, yo me Bhaktya prayacchati,

thadaham bhaktyupahritam asnami prayatatmanaha " . (Whoever offers me with

love, a leaf, a flower, a fruit, or even water, I accept and enjoy that

offering of love by that man of purified intellect.)..Does He not know

that all the four commodities He has listed were created by Him?. Did He

not grab what Kuchela was hiding under his arm-pit, being too shy to

offer the beaten rice he had brought? Did He not eat that beaten rice

that Bhakta had brought, with avarice, as if He has not seen beaten rice

before? and that too, that beaten rice bundled up in a rag and soaked in

Kuchela's sweat? Does it not show His love and fondness for His

devotees? For the Lord, nothing is more important than the devotee,

and nothing dearer than devotion, which is the most intense form of

love.( Prematmaka-bhakti.) So there is nothing absolutely wrong in

making offerings to God

 

What I meant as inferior form of Bhakti was the devotee promising the

Lord, " Lord! Cure my child's sickness-- I will offer you Tulabharam-- "

Many people do, do this sort of promise without thinking that they are

trying to barter with the Lord! One can't blame them, as it has become

part of our culture, under the name of " nercha " , which, to me, looks odd.

 

Love

KVG.

 

 

 

hba9331 wrote:

 

> Om Namo Narayanaya

> A very good topic to discuss on this forum. Everybody should

> earnestly participate...since there are bound to be various

> questions coming up in our mind...one such question I have

>

> It was discussed in one of the Books of AMMA that Guruvayoor does

> not need any of our material offerings in cash or kind, all those

> goes to the funding account. But if the below concept is followed it

> would be very difficult to maintain the temple and the

> infrastructure needed and the salary to be paid to various employee.

> We in Kerala do not have the concept of KARSEVA as with the Sikh

> community where free service is also an offering. The give and take

> concept if discouraged would have far reaching consequence on the

> day to day working of such institution...I have my own doubts if the

> Hindu system would work purely on the Bakthi concept. Currently when

> some bad time falls on us, we run to Guruvayoorappan, same way as a

> child runs to his/her parents when they are in trouble or even when

> they have a bad dream...but since we are not kids we feel it would

> not be fair to go empty handed so promise Guruvayoorappan certain

> Vazipadu....more over even the Vazipadus are classified into do this

> and you get this..do that and that for good health...etc..

>

> I shall be very thankful if these doubts are cleared by the good

> members in our forum.

>

> Narayana Narayana.....

>

> Pravin

>

> guruvayur <guruvayur%40>,

> " K.V Gopalakrishna "

> <gopalakrishna.kv wrote:

> >

> > Dear Mataji,

> > Radhe Krishna!

> >

> > I agree with you one hundred per cent. With due regard to what

> Shri

> > Ganapathy Raman and Krishna Prasad have said, in some cases, it is

> a

> > fact that complacency creeps in when one acquires the object he

> has been

> > longing for. This complacency makes him too jubilant, raising

> his ego

> > level so high, that he forgets for a time, that what he has

> acquired is

> > by divine grace also. I have deliberately added the word " also "

> > because many people think that one's hard work was responsible for

> his

> > upliftment in life, or that it was the cleverness of the doctor

> and the

> > efficacy of the medicine that has cured him. I would like to

> reiterate

> > here that hard work is definitely required to be done if one wants

> to

> > come up in life. Similarly, the doctor's experience and the

> efficacy

> > of the medicine play a very important part in curing the

> disease. But

> > all these require divine grace to have their effect. Without

> that, no

> > medicine will work, and any amount of hard work will not pay.

> People

> > have the habit of blaming God when something wrong happens without

> > realising that the bad that has happened is result of one's own

> Karma.

> > Let us not forget that even to think of God, His grace is

> required.

> > " Iswaranugrahad eva bhakthirbhavathi Kesave! "

> >

> > Promising to perform a particular " vazhipadu " to God if He favours

> etc.,

> > like performing a " Tulabharam " if one gets cured of his ailment

> etc., is

> > an inferior type of Bhakti. On the face of the person's promise

> and

> > cure of the disease, it may look as though the person got cured

> because

> > of the promise made. But really speaking, it is not so. It is

> the

> > person's belief on one side and the fruits of Karma on the other

> cured

> > him. The Lord will accept anything if offered with Bhakti.

> But what

> > He wants is Bhakti and Bhakti alone.

> >

> > Regards

> > KVG.

> >

> >

> > Saroja Ramanujam wrote:

> >

> > > Well said Gopalakrishnan!

> > > I think that perhaps it is relevant here to examine the

> following

> > > sloka from Gita.

> > >

> > > Chathurvidhaa bajanthe maamjanaah sukrthino arjuna

> > > aatho jignaasurarthaartheejnaanee cha bharathrshbha

> > > Krishna says,

> > > 'Four types of devotees of noble deeds worship Me, Arjuna,the

> seeker

> > > after worldly possessions, the afflicted,the seeker for

> knowledge and

> > > the man of wisdom, O best of Bharathas A man who believes in God

> prays

> > > for the fulfilment of his cherished objects of the world,wealth

> or

> > > child and so on. When he gets them as a result of his prayer his

> > > devotion is strengthened and develops into faith.If he has not

> already

> > > acquired faith he will lose belief if his desire is not

> fulfilled.This

> > > is why we often hear the cry 'I no more believe in God,' from

> those

> > > who face disappointments in life.

> > > Sugreeva and dhruva can be cited as examples of arthaarthee type

> of

> > > devotees, the former devoloped faith after the fulfilment of his

> > > desire while Dhruva had both faith and beliefand became a jnani

> later,

> > > elevated to the status of dhruva star.

> > > The second kind of devotee who seeks God as his sole refuge when

> in

> > > distress like Droupadi or Gajendra are aarthees with staunch

> faith

> > > that He alone is their saviour, which is termed as

> mahavisvasam ,among

> > > the five requisites of saranagathi. They do not seek Him for

> worldly

> > > pleasures but remain ardent devotees through out their life

> which

> > > alone will make them call out to Him in earnest.In normal life

> we do

> > > not have that faith in God eventhough we have belief in Him and

> > > therefore we suffer in consequenceHere comes the importance of

> the

> > > word 'sukrthinah' which Krishna uses to describe the four kinds

> of

> > > devotees. To think of God and yearn for His mercy requires

> > > poorvajanmapunya. There is a story to illustrate this.

> > > A man who was a confirmed sinner was sitting on a tree and Lord

> Siva

> > > happened to pass that way with Parvathi. Siva told Parvathi that

> the

> > > man is going to fall from the tree and die since it is his fate.

> > > Parvathi, being the divine mother, took pity on the man and said

> that

> > > they should save him to which Siva replied that it was his karma

> being

> > > a sinner to die such a death.When Parvathi remonstrated with him

> Siva

> > > said that He will save the man if he cries out 'appa' and she

> should

> > > save him if he says 'amma' when he falls. Parvathi was happy

> without

> > > realising the real purport of Siva's words.The branch on which

> the man

> > > was sitting broke and he fell down crying'aiyo,' because he did

> not

> > > have the sukrthi to call God's name at the time of death

> > > Jignasu is one who has pure devotion and does not seek the

> pleasures

> > > of life nor is he worried about distress because the only thing

> that

> > > could cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and

> to

> > > acertain extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of

> Bhakthi. A

> > > jignasu who has pure devotion and does not seek the pleasures of

> life

> > > nor is he worried about distress because the only thing that

> could

> > > cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and to

> acertain

> > > extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A

> jignasu

> > > loves the Lord for his own sake and seeks to acquire the jnana

> which

> > > the Lord Himself gives as in the case of Udhdhava or through

> someone

> > > as He did for Parikshit.

> > >

> > > The last but not least is the jnani who has realised the truth

> about

> > > the Lord like Prahlada, Narada and other sages who were both

> bhakthas

> > > and jnanis.

> > >

> > > Besides, Ramanuja says in his sribhashya,

> > > 'dhyAnam cha thailadhArAvath avicchinna smrthisanthAna roopam,'

> > > continous flow of remembrance like the stream of continously

> dropping

> > > oil. 'DhruvA smrthih ;smrthilambhe sarvagranTheenAm

> > > vipramokshah,'(Chan.7-26-2) when the constant,dhruva,

> remembrance,

> > > smrthih is attained all knots are rent asunder. Thus

> DHruvAsmrthi is

> > > prescribed as the means of liberation

> > >

> > >

> > > Saroja Ramanujam

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > .

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > May god bless you,

> > >

> > > Dr. Saroja Ramanujam, M.A., Ph.D, Siromani in

> sanskrit.

> > >

> > >

> > > -------------------------

> -------

> > >

> > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail Beta.

> > >

> <http://us.rd./evt=40791/*http://advision.webevents..co

> <http://us.rd./evt=40791/*http://advision.webevents..co>

> m/handraisers>

> > >

> > >

> >

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Of course for running the temple,paying salary etc money is required but the point is who are the persons chalking out the various vazhipadus and fixing rates?The temple authorities and not God.If the temple authorities say that to run the temple money is required and hence donate your might they won't get much but if they exhibit in boards that such and such vazhipadus can bring this and that benefit people are glad to contribute whether the same materialises or not and so the authorities are trying to display a long list to collect funds in this way which has nothing to do with Bhakthy or God.This trend has become in vogue during the past decades only.Centuries back there were no such things. Temples like Guruvayur or Sabarimala or Tripati attract devotees in millions and in this way the coffers also can overflow by the so called vazhipadus.A devotee

is happy iif he does some thulabharam with sugar or plantain or anything by paying the rates fixed by the administration thinking that God is pleased with his offering, and the administration is happy that their bank balances increase which can be utilised and misutilised for various things.This is actually what is happening in big temples.On the otherhand there are innumerable temples which don't hv any income even to offer neivedyam to the Deity or having enough oil even to light the lamps.Why the devotees don't flock to those temples also and do the vazhipadus so that those temples too can see the light of the day.Is Guruvayurappan sits only in Guruvayur or Sastha sits only in Sabarimalai when the all pervading God is in every atom and every idol why some temples flourish and some suffer?Does that mean that people who go to those less fortunate temples are not devotees?In Tripati there is a

custom that everyday whatever money and other offerings come will be accounted before the Deity in the night but it is not known how the money is being spent and whether the Deity gives permission for all the expenses?There was even an attempt years back that the amounts collected shuld be invested in Govt bonds thereby diverting the funds of the temple but due to the protest of the devotees the idea was shelved. There is noting wrong in collecting money for the administration of temple by means like vazhipadus but that can't be connected with Bhakthy as there is no sanction from the Deity for the same and it is only the temple administration fixes the same.Years back in GVR udayasthamana pooja was fixed at Rs.5000 but now I don't know the amount but certainly it must be 50000 and what is the guidelines for fixing such exhorbitant rates?The temple

administration members enjoy in all comforts from the so called collections and that too everybody knows.Then how this collection can be linked to ardent Bhakthy?Did the Deity of GVR or Sabarimala told the administration to collect so much money? So in the name of God all these are made.In a country like India with more than a billion people there is always the tendency to resort to superstitions in beliefs and the eagerness to know abt the future thru astrology.If there is something wrong immediately it is decided to conduct an ashtamangalya prasna is conducted.The astrologers say that God is furious because the surroundings are polluted and the devotees are not havig proper devotion,roads are not good and all such things.When the same is said by media and people nobody bothers and when the astrologers say that God is angry immedately steps are taken to ward off evils supposed to happen if the same

are not done.Are they not looking funny? My intention is not to fnd fault with anything that is going on which everybody knows but the pertinent thing is that for a Bhaktha such things appear to be superfluous and when so many temples ae suffering for lack of funs why certain important temples alone take the cakes when we accept that God is everywhere.There is no explanation for this anamoly and the same will continue. So by doing vazhipadus and offerings the temple coffers can be filled up but not lead one to Real Bhakthy.Was there such a system during the days of Bhattathiri and Poonthanam?Because those days they had so much love and devotion to God and never bothered abt other things..Now the trend has changed and money takes the upper hand over Real Bhakthy.What a pity? If anybody is offended by these comments I express regret as I hv only stated what I felt and to enforce the fact

that Bhakthy has nothing to do with the so called offerings and the same depends on individual choices and not on the choice of people running temple administration. Hare Krishna. hba9331 <pravin9 wrote: Om Namo NarayanayaA very good topic to discuss on this forum. Everybody should earnestly participate...since there are bound to be various questions coming

up in our mind...one such question I haveIt was discussed in one of the Books of AMMA that Guruvayoor does not need any of our material offerings in cash or kind, all those goes to the funding account. But if the below concept is followed it would be very difficult to maintain the temple and the infrastructure needed and the salary to be paid to various employee. We in Kerala do not have the concept of KARSEVA as with the Sikh community where free service is also an offering. The give and take concept if discouraged would have far reaching consequence on the day to day working of such institution...I have my own doubts if the Hindu system would work purely on the Bakthi concept. Currently when some bad time falls on us, we run to Guruvayoorappan, same way as a child runs to his/her parents when they are in trouble or even when they have a bad dream...but since we are not kids we feel it would not be fair to

go empty handed so promise Guruvayoorappan certain Vazipadu....more over even the Vazipadus are classified into do this and you get this..do that and that for good health...etc..I shall be very thankful if these doubts are cleared by the good members in our forum.Narayana Narayana.....Pravinguruvayur , "K.V Gopalakrishna" <gopalakrishna.kv wrote:>> Dear Mataji,> Radhe Krishna!> > I agree with you one hundred per cent. With due regard to what Shri > Ganapathy Raman and Krishna Prasad have said, in some cases, it is a > fact that complacency creeps in when one acquires the object he has been > longing for. This complacency makes him too jubilant, raising his ego > level so high, that he forgets for a time, that what he has acquired is

> by divine grace also. I have deliberately added the word "also" > because many people think that one's hard work was responsible for his > upliftment in life, or that it was the cleverness of the doctor and the > efficacy of the medicine that has cured him. I would like to reiterate > here that hard work is definitely required to be done if one wants to > come up in life. Similarly, the doctor's experience and the efficacy > of the medicine play a very important part in curing the disease. But > all these require divine grace to have their effect. Without that, no > medicine will work, and any amount of hard work will not pay. People > have the habit of blaming God when something wrong happens without > realising that the bad that has happened is result of one's own Karma. > Let us not forget that even to think of God, His grace is required.

> "Iswaranugrahad eva bhakthirbhavathi Kesave!"> > Promising to perform a particular "vazhipadu" to God if He favours etc., > like performing a "Tulabharam" if one gets cured of his ailment etc., is > an inferior type of Bhakti. On the face of the person's promise and > cure of the disease, it may look as though the person got cured because > of the promise made. But really speaking, it is not so. It is the > person's belief on one side and the fruits of Karma on the other cured > him. The Lord will accept anything if offered with Bhakti. But what > He wants is Bhakti and Bhakti alone.> > Regards> KVG.> > > Saroja Ramanujam wrote:> > > Well said Gopalakrishnan!> > I think that perhaps it is relevant here to examine the following > > sloka from Gita.> > > > Chathurvidhaa

bajanthe maamjanaah sukrthino arjuna> > aatho jignaasurarthaartheejnaanee cha bharathrshbha> > Krishna says,> > 'Four types of devotees of noble deeds worship Me, Arjuna,the seeker > > after worldly possessions, the afflicted,the seeker for knowledge and > > the man of wisdom, O best of Bharathas A man who believes in God prays > > for the fulfilment of his cherished objects of the world,wealth or > > child and so on. When he gets them as a result of his prayer his > > devotion is strengthened and develops into faith.If he has not already > > acquired faith he will lose belief if his desire is not fulfilled.This > > is why we often hear the cry 'I no more believe in God,' from those > > who face disappointments in life.> > Sugreeva and dhruva can be cited as examples of arthaarthee type of > > devotees, the

former devoloped faith after the fulfilment of his > > desire while Dhruva had both faith and beliefand became a jnani later, > > elevated to the status of dhruva star.> > The second kind of devotee who seeks God as his sole refuge when in > > distress like Droupadi or Gajendra are aarthees with staunch faith > > that He alone is their saviour, which is termed as mahavisvasam ,among > > the five requisites of saranagathi. They do not seek Him for worldly > > pleasures but remain ardent devotees through out their life which > > alone will make them call out to Him in earnest.In normal life we do > > not have that faith in God eventhough we have belief in Him and > > therefore we suffer in consequenceHere comes the importance of the > > word 'sukrthinah' which Krishna uses to describe the four kinds of > > devotees. To

think of God and yearn for His mercy requires > > poorvajanmapunya. There is a story to illustrate this.> > A man who was a confirmed sinner was sitting on a tree and Lord Siva > > happened to pass that way with Parvathi. Siva told Parvathi that the > > man is going to fall from the tree and die since it is his fate. > > Parvathi, being the divine mother, took pity on the man and said that > > they should save him to which Siva replied that it was his karma being > > a sinner to die such a death.When Parvathi remonstrated with him Siva > > said that He will save the man if he cries out 'appa' and she should > > save him if he says 'amma' when he falls. Parvathi was happy without > > realising the real purport of Siva's words.The branch on which the man > > was sitting broke and he fell down crying'aiyo,' because he did not

> > have the sukrthi to call God's name at the time of death> > Jignasu is one who has pure devotion and does not seek the pleasures > > of life nor is he worried about distress because the only thing that > > could cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and to > > acertain extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A > > jignasu who has pure devotion and does not seek the pleasures of life > > nor is he worried about distress because the only thing that could > > cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and to acertain > > extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A jignasu > > loves the Lord for his own sake and seeks to acquire the jnana which > > the Lord Himself gives as in the case of Udhdhava or through someone > > as He did for Parikshit.>

> > > The last but not least is the jnani who has realised the truth about > > the Lord like Prahlada, Narada and other sages who were both bhakthas > > and jnanis.> > > > Besides, Ramanuja says in his sribhashya,> > 'dhyAnam cha thailadhArAvath avicchinna smrthisanthAna roopam,' > > continous flow of remembrance like the stream of continously dropping > > oil. 'DhruvA smrthih ;smrthilambhe sarvagranTheenAm > > vipramokshah,'(Chan.7-26-2) when the constant,dhruva, remembrance, > > smrthih is attained all knots are rent asunder. Thus DHruvAsmrthi is > > prescribed as the means of liberation> > > > > > Saroja Ramanujam> >> > > >> > .> >> >> >> >> > May god bless you,> > > > Dr. Saroja Ramanujam,

M.A., Ph.D, Siromani in sanskrit.> > > >> > --------------------------------> > > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail Beta. > > <http://us.rd./evt=40791/*http://advision.webevents./handraisers> > >> >>

India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new Click here

Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Bravo! Ganapathy Raman, . I totally agree with you. In my opinion praying to God that I will put money in your hundi , for instance, if I get this result is tantamount to makingHim a commission agent.But we cannot criticise those who pray in dire circumstances tht they will do thulabhara when the child get well etc. because they just want to do it as a thanksgiving to Lord for answering their prayers.They belong to 'aarthee' category.As far as I am concerned I always pray that I will read Narayaneeyam or Sundarakandam at one sitting or something like that.When I go to the temple I do whatever I can in the way of offering . This reminds one of Prahladha who, Mukkur Lakshmi narasimhachariar used to say in his discourses, when the Lord asked what boon he wanted , said "I am not a trader and I do not want anything except cotinous devotion to You." God is where you think He is because He is everywhere. Saroja

RamanujamGANAPATHY RAMAN <agraman62 wrote: Of course for running the temple,paying salary etc money is required but the point is who are the persons chalking out the various vazhipadus and fixing rates?The temple authorities and not God.If the temple authorities say that to run the temple money is required and hence donate your might they won't get much but if they exhibit in boards that such and such vazhipadus can bring this and that benefit people are glad to contribute whether

the same materialises or not and so the authorities are trying to display a long list to collect funds in this way which has nothing to do with Bhakthy or God.This trend has become in vogue during the past decades only.Centuries back there were no such things. Temples like Guruvayur or Sabarimala or Tripati attract devotees in millions and in this way the coffers also can overflow by the so called vazhipadus.A devotee is happy iif he does some thulabharam with sugar or plantain or anything by paying the rates fixed by the administration thinking that God is pleased with his offering, and the administration is happy that their bank balances increase which can be utilised and misutilised for various things.This is actually what is happening in big temples.On the otherhand there are innumerable temples which don't hv any income even to offer neivedyam to the Deity or having enough oil even to

light the lamps.Why the devotees don't flock to those temples also and do the vazhipadus so that those temples too can see the light of the day.Is Guruvayurappan sits only in Guruvayur or Sastha sits only in Sabarimalai when the all pervading God is in every atom and every idol why some temples flourish and some suffer?Does that mean that people who go to those less fortunate temples are not devotees?In Tripati there is a custom that everyday whatever money and other offerings come will be accounted before the Deity in the night but it is not known how the money is being spent and whether the Deity gives permission for all the expenses?There was even an attempt years back that the amounts collected shuld be invested in Govt bonds thereby diverting the funds of the temple but due to the protest of the devotees the idea was shelved. There is noting wrong in

collecting money for the administration of temple by means like vazhipadus but that can't be connected with Bhakthy as there is no sanction from the Deity for the same and it is only the temple administration fixes the same.Years back in GVR udayasthamana pooja was fixed at Rs.5000 but now I don't know the amount but certainly it must be 50000 and what is the guidelines for fixing such exhorbitant rates?The temple administration members enjoy in all comforts from the so called collections and that too everybody knows.Then how this collection can be linked to ardent Bhakthy?Did the Deity of GVR or Sabarimala told the administration to collect so much money? So in the name of God all these are made.In a country like India with more than a billion people there is always the tendency to resort to superstitions in beliefs and the eagerness to know abt the future thru astrology.If

there is something wrong immediately it is decided to conduct an ashtamangalya prasna is conducted.The astrologers say that God is furious because the surroundings are polluted and the devotees are not havig proper devotion,roads are not good and all such things.When the same is said by media and people nobody bothers and when the astrologers say that God is angry immedately steps are taken to ward off evils supposed to happen if the same are not done.Are they not looking funny? My intention is not to fnd fault with anything that is going on which everybody knows but the pertinent thing is that for a Bhaktha such things appear to be superfluous and when so many temples ae suffering for lack of funs why certain important temples alone take the cakes when we accept that God is everywhere.There is no explanation for this anamoly and the same will continue. So by doing vazhipadus and offerings the temple

coffers can be filled up but not lead one to Real Bhakthy.Was there such a system during the days of Bhattathiri and Poonthanam?Because those days they had so much love and devotion to God and never bothered abt other things..Now the trend has changed and money takes the upper hand over Real Bhakthy.What a pity? If anybody is offended by these comments I express regret as I hv only stated what I felt and to enforce the fact that Bhakthy has nothing to do with the so called offerings and the same depends on individual choices and not on the choice of people running temple administration. Hare Krishna. hba9331 <pravin9 wrote: Om Namo NarayanayaA very good topic to discuss on this forum. Everybody

should earnestly participate...since there are bound to be various questions coming up in our mind...one such question I haveIt was discussed in one of the Books of AMMA that Guruvayoor does not need any of our material offerings in cash or kind, all those goes to the funding account. But if the below concept is followed it would be very difficult to maintain the temple and the infrastructure needed and the salary to be paid to various employee. We in Kerala do not have the concept of KARSEVA as with the Sikh community where free service is also an offering. The give and take concept if discouraged would have far reaching consequence on the day to day working of such institution...I have my own doubts if the Hindu system would work purely on the Bakthi concept. Currently when some bad time falls on us, we run to Guruvayoorappan, same way as a child runs to his/her parents when they are in trouble or even

when they have a bad dream...but since we are not kids we feel it would not be fair to go empty handed so promise Guruvayoorappan certain Vazipadu....more over even the Vazipadus are classified into do this and you get this..do that and that for good health...etc..I shall be very thankful if these doubts are cleared by the good members in our forum.Narayana Narayana.....Pravinguruvayur , "K.V Gopalakrishna" <gopalakrishna.kv wrote:>> Dear Mataji,> Radhe Krishna!> > I agree with you one hundred per cent. With due regard to what Shri > Ganapathy Raman and Krishna Prasad have said, in some cases, it is a > fact that complacency creeps in when one acquires the object he has been > longing for. This complacency makes him too jubilant, raising his

ego > level so high, that he forgets for a time, that what he has acquired is > by divine grace also. I have deliberately added the word "also" > because many people think that one's hard work was responsible for his > upliftment in life, or that it was the cleverness of the doctor and the > efficacy of the medicine that has cured him. I would like to reiterate > here that hard work is definitely required to be done if one wants to > come up in life. Similarly, the doctor's experience and the efficacy > of the medicine play a very important part in curing the disease. But > all these require divine grace to have their effect. Without that, no > medicine will work, and any amount of hard work will not pay. People > have the habit of blaming God when something wrong happens without > realising that the bad that has happened is result of one's own Karma.

> Let us not forget that even to think of God, His grace is required. > "Iswaranugrahad eva bhakthirbhavathi Kesave!"> > Promising to perform a particular "vazhipadu" to God if He favours etc., > like performing a "Tulabharam" if one gets cured of his ailment etc., is > an inferior type of Bhakti. On the face of the person's promise and > cure of the disease, it may look as though the person got cured because > of the promise made. But really speaking, it is not so. It is the > person's belief on one side and the fruits of Karma on the other cured > him. The Lord will accept anything if offered with Bhakti. But what > He wants is Bhakti and Bhakti alone.> > Regards> KVG.> > > Saroja Ramanujam wrote:> > > Well said Gopalakrishnan!> > I think that perhaps it is relevant here to examine the

following > > sloka from Gita.> > > > Chathurvidhaa bajanthe maamjanaah sukrthino arjuna> > aatho jignaasurarthaartheejnaanee cha bharathrshbha> > Krishna says,> > 'Four types of devotees of noble deeds worship Me, Arjuna,the seeker > > after worldly possessions, the afflicted,the seeker for knowledge and > > the man of wisdom, O best of Bharathas A man who believes in God prays > > for the fulfilment of his cherished objects of the world,wealth or > > child and so on. When he gets them as a result of his prayer his > > devotion is strengthened and develops into faith.If he has not already > > acquired faith he will lose belief if his desire is not fulfilled.This > > is why we often hear the cry 'I no more believe in God,' from those > > who face disappointments in life.> > Sugreeva and

dhruva can be cited as examples of arthaarthee type of > > devotees, the former devoloped faith after the fulfilment of his > > desire while Dhruva had both faith and beliefand became a jnani later, > > elevated to the status of dhruva star.> > The second kind of devotee who seeks God as his sole refuge when in > > distress like Droupadi or Gajendra are aarthees with staunch faith > > that He alone is their saviour, which is termed as mahavisvasam ,among > > the five requisites of saranagathi. They do not seek Him for worldly > > pleasures but remain ardent devotees through out their life which > > alone will make them call out to Him in earnest.In normal life we do > > not have that faith in God eventhough we have belief in Him and > > therefore we suffer in consequenceHere comes the importance of the > > word

'sukrthinah' which Krishna uses to describe the four kinds of > > devotees. To think of God and yearn for His mercy requires > > poorvajanmapunya. There is a story to illustrate this.> > A man who was a confirmed sinner was sitting on a tree and Lord Siva > > happened to pass that way with Parvathi. Siva told Parvathi that the > > man is going to fall from the tree and die since it is his fate. > > Parvathi, being the divine mother, took pity on the man and said that > > they should save him to which Siva replied that it was his karma being > > a sinner to die such a death.When Parvathi remonstrated with him Siva > > said that He will save the man if he cries out 'appa' and she should > > save him if he says 'amma' when he falls. Parvathi was happy without > > realising the real purport of Siva's words.The branch on which the man

> > was sitting broke and he fell down crying'aiyo,' because he did not > > have the sukrthi to call God's name at the time of death> > Jignasu is one who has pure devotion and does not seek the pleasures > > of life nor is he worried about distress because the only thing that > > could cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and to > > acertain extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A > > jignasu who has pure devotion and does not seek the pleasures of life > > nor is he worried about distress because the only thing that could > > cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and to acertain > > extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A jignasu > > loves the Lord for his own sake and seeks to acquire the jnana which > > the Lord Himself gives as in

the case of Udhdhava or through someone > > as He did for Parikshit.> > > > The last but not least is the jnani who has realised the truth about > > the Lord like Prahlada, Narada and other sages who were both bhakthas > > and jnanis.> > > > Besides, Ramanuja says in his sribhashya,> > 'dhyAnam cha thailadhArAvath avicchinna smrthisanthAna roopam,' > > continous flow of remembrance like the stream of continously dropping > > oil. 'DhruvA smrthih ;smrthilambhe sarvagranTheenAm > > vipramokshah,'(Chan.7-26-2) when the constant,dhruva, remembrance, > > smrthih is attained all knots are rent asunder. Thus DHruvAsmrthi is > > prescribed as the means of liberation> > > > > > Saroja Ramanujam> >> > > >> > .> >> >>

>> >> > May god bless you,> > > > Dr. Saroja Ramanujam, M.A., Ph.D, Siromani in sanskrit.> > > >> > --------------------------------> > > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail Beta. > > <http://us.rd./evt=40791/*http://advision.webevents./handraisers> > >> >> India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new Click hereCatch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click here May god bless you, Dr. Saroja Ramanujam, M.A., Ph.D, Siromani in sanskrit.

Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Small Business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Definition of unalloyed bhakti.

 

anyAbhilAs.itA-s'unyam

jnAna-karmAdy-anAvrtam

anukUlyena kris.nAnu-

s'Ilanam bhaktir uttamA

 

“One should render transcendental loving service to

the Supreme Lord Krishna favorably and without desire

for material profit or gain through fruitive

activities or philosophical speculation. That is

called pure devotional service.”

Bhakti-rasAmrta-sindhu 1.1.11 of Rupa Goswami (the

foremost of Sri Chaitanya's direct disciples. One

among the famous 6 goswamis of Vrindavan)

 

Dear Pravin,

 

Karseva is also an important part of bhakti. Bhakti

means devotional service. Service is so important

aspect of bhakti. Service to the holy name and

prasadam is done with the tongue. This is the

beginning of all services. Voluntary services like

cleaning the temple and keeping the shoes of devotees,

cooking for the Lord and devotees etc shoul be

encouraged.

 

Thankyou for bringing up this nice angle.

 

Hare Krishna

Abhilash

 

 

 

 

--- hba9331 <pravin9 wrote:

 

> Om Namo Narayanaya

> A very good topic to discuss on this forum.

> Everybody should

> earnestly participate...since there are bound to be

> various

> questions coming up in our mind...one such question

> I have

>

> It was discussed in one of the Books of AMMA that

> Guruvayoor does

> not need any of our material offerings in cash or

> kind, all those

> goes to the funding account. But if the below

> concept is followed it

> would be very difficult to maintain the temple and

> the

> infrastructure needed and the salary to be paid to

> various employee.

> We in Kerala do not have the concept of KARSEVA as

> with the Sikh

> community where free service is also an offering.

> The give and take

> concept if discouraged would have far reaching

> consequence on the

> day to day working of such institution...I have my

> own doubts if the

> Hindu system would work purely on the Bakthi

> concept. Currently when

> some bad time falls on us, we run to

> Guruvayoorappan, same way as a

> child runs to his/her parents when they are in

> trouble or even when

> they have a bad dream...but since we are not kids we

> feel it would

> not be fair to go empty handed so promise

> Guruvayoorappan certain

> Vazipadu....more over even the Vazipadus are

> classified into do this

> and you get this..do that and that for good

> health...etc..

>

> I shall be very thankful if these doubts are cleared

> by the good

> members in our forum.

>

> Narayana Narayana.....

>

> Pravin

>

> guruvayur , " K.V

> Gopalakrishna "

> <gopalakrishna.kv wrote:

> >

> > Dear Mataji,

> > Radhe Krishna!

> >

> > I agree with you one hundred per cent. With due

> regard to what

> Shri

> > Ganapathy Raman and Krishna Prasad have said, in

> some cases, it is

> a

> > fact that complacency creeps in when one acquires

> the object he

> has been

> > longing for. This complacency makes him too

> jubilant, raising

> his ego

> > level so high, that he forgets for a time, that

> what he has

> acquired is

> > by divine grace also. I have deliberately added

> the word " also "

> > because many people think that one's hard work was

> responsible for

> his

> > upliftment in life, or that it was the cleverness

> of the doctor

> and the

> > efficacy of the medicine that has cured him. I

> would like to

> reiterate

> > here that hard work is definitely required to be

> done if one wants

> to

> > come up in life. Similarly, the doctor's

> experience and the

> efficacy

> > of the medicine play a very important part in

> curing the

> disease. But

> > all these require divine grace to have their

> effect. Without

> that, no

> > medicine will work, and any amount of hard work

> will not pay.

> People

> > have the habit of blaming God when something wrong

> happens without

> > realising that the bad that has happened is result

> of one's own

> Karma.

> > Let us not forget that even to think of God, His

> grace is

> required.

> > " Iswaranugrahad eva bhakthirbhavathi Kesave! "

> >

> > Promising to perform a particular " vazhipadu " to

> God if He favours

> etc.,

> > like performing a " Tulabharam " if one gets cured

> of his ailment

> etc., is

> > an inferior type of Bhakti. On the face of the

> person's promise

> and

> > cure of the disease, it may look as though the

> person got cured

> because

> > of the promise made. But really speaking, it is

> not so. It is

> the

> > person's belief on one side and the fruits of

> Karma on the other

> cured

> > him. The Lord will accept anything if offered

> with Bhakti.

> But what

> > He wants is Bhakti and Bhakti alone.

> >

> > Regards

> > KVG.

> >

> >

> > Saroja Ramanujam wrote:

> >

> > > Well said Gopalakrishnan!

> > > I think that perhaps it is relevant here to

> examine the

> following

> > > sloka from Gita.

> > >

> > > Chathurvidhaa bajanthe maamjanaah sukrthino

> arjuna

> > > aatho jignaasurarthaartheejnaanee cha

> bharathrshbha

> > > Krishna says,

> > > 'Four types of devotees of noble deeds worship

> Me, Arjuna,the

> seeker

> > > after worldly possessions, the afflicted,the

> seeker for

> knowledge and

> > > the man of wisdom, O best of Bharathas A man who

> believes in God

> prays

> > > for the fulfilment of his cherished objects of

> the world,wealth

> or

> > > child and so on. When he gets them as a result

> of his prayer his

> > > devotion is strengthened and develops into

> faith.If he has not

> already

> > > acquired faith he will lose belief if his desire

> is not

> fulfilled.This

> > > is why we often hear the cry 'I no more believe

> in God,' from

> those

> > > who face disappointments in life.

> > > Sugreeva and dhruva can be cited as examples of

> arthaarthee type

> of

> > > devotees, the former devoloped faith after the

> fulfilment of his

> > > desire while Dhruva had both faith and beliefand

> became a jnani

> later,

> > > elevated to the status of dhruva star.

> > > The second kind of devotee who seeks God as his

> sole refuge when

> in

> > > distress like Droupadi or Gajendra are aarthees

> with staunch

> faith

> > > that He alone is their saviour, which is termed

> as

> mahavisvasam ,among

> > > the five requisites of saranagathi. They do not

> seek Him for

> worldly

> > > pleasures but remain ardent devotees through out

> their life

> which

> > > alone will make them call out to Him in

> earnest.In normal life

> we do

> > > not have that faith in God eventhough we have

> belief in Him and

> > > therefore we suffer in consequenceHere comes the

> importance

=== message truncated ===

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Sri. Ganapathy Raman,

Namaskarams. You have a very valid point. People should patronise

all temples, as it is the same all-pervading Lord is present in all

places, and all temples. It again depends on the beliefs and faiths

of the devotees to decide which temple they should throng. How to

impress upon the devotees about this aspect, I do not know. In my

humble opinion, this can be done only by renovating old temples and

attracting the local devotees to those temples. Temple authorities

have no business to put up boards which describe the nature of Vazhipadu

and the fruits it will give to the devotee. Such temple authorities

should be sued under the consumer protection act if the assured results

are not obtained! How can anybody assure the results when God

dispenses fruits of action? And is there any guarantee that if a

certain vazhipadu is performed, such results will follow? Then there

will be Insurance companies cropping up, collecting premiums and paying

compensations for non-receipt of benefits.

 

I have visited many temples, including Guruvayoor. I have seen boards

which display the cost of rituals which the devotees normally perform,

but I have not seen the enumeration of benefits the devotee will get in

return. Are you sure about it?

 

Regards

KVG.

 

 

GANAPATHY RAMAN wrote:

 

>

>

> Of course for running the temple,paying salary etc money is required

> but the point is who are the persons chalking out the various

> vazhipadus and fixing rates?The temple authorities and not God.If the

> temple authorities say that to

> run the temple money is required and hence donate your might they

> won't get

> much but if they exhibit in boards that such and such vazhipadus can

> bring this and that benefit people are glad to contribute whether the

> same materialises or

> not and so the authorities are trying to display a long list to

> collect funds in this way which has nothing to do with Bhakthy or

> God.This trend has become in vogue during the past decades

> only.Centuries back there were no such things.

>

> Temples like Guruvayur or Sabarimala or Tripati attract devotees in

> millions and

> in this way the coffers also can overflow by the so called

> vazhipadus.A devotee

> is happy iif he does some thulabharam with sugar or plantain or

> anything by paying the rates fixed by the administration thinking that

> God is pleased with his offering, and the administration is happy that

> their bank balances increase which

> can be utilised and misutilised for various things.This is actually

> what is happening in big temples.On the otherhand there are

> innumerable temples which don't hv any income even to offer neivedyam

> to the Deity or having enough oil even to light the lamps.Why the

> devotees don't flock to those temples also and

> do the vazhipadus so that those temples too can see the light of the

> day.Is

> Guruvayurappan sits only in Guruvayur or Sastha sits only in

> Sabarimalai when

> the all pervading God is in every atom and every idol why some temples

> flourish and some suffer?Does that mean that people who go to those

> less fortunate

> temples are not devotees?In Tripati there is a custom that everyday

> whatever

> money and other offerings come will be accounted before the Deity in

> the night

> but it is not known how the money is being spent and whether the Deity

> gives permission for all the expenses?There was even an attempt years

> back that the

> amounts collected shuld be invested in Govt bonds thereby diverting

> the funds of the temple but due to the protest of the devotees the

> idea was shelved.

>

> There is noting wrong in collecting money for the administration of

> temple by

> means like vazhipadus but that can't be connected with Bhakthy as

> there is no

> sanction from the Deity for the same and it is only the temple

> administration fixes the same.Years back in GVR udayasthamana pooja

> was fixed at Rs.5000

> but now I don't know the amount but certainly it must be 50000 and

> what is the

> guidelines for fixing such exhorbitant rates?The temple administration

> members enjoy in all comforts from the so called collections and that

> too everybody knows.Then how this collection can be linked to ardent

> Bhakthy?Did the

> Deity of GVR or Sabarimala told the administration to collect so much

> money?

> So in the name of God all these are made.In a country like India with

> more than a billion people there is always the tendency to resort to

> superstitions in beliefs

> and the eagerness to know abt the future thru astrology.If there is

> something

> wrong immediately it is decided to conduct an ashtamangalya prasna is

> conducted.The astrologers say that God is furious because the

> surroundings are polluted and the devotees are not havig proper

> devotion,roads are not good and all such things.When the same is said

> by media and people nobody bothers and when the astrologers say that

> God is angry immedately steps are taken to ward

> off evils supposed to happen if the same are not done.Are they not

> looking funny?

>

> My intention is not to fnd fault with anything that is going on which

> everybody knows but the pertinent thing is that for a Bhaktha such

> things appear to be superfluous and when so many temples ae suffering

> for lack of funs why certain important temples alone take the cakes

> when we accept that God is everywhere.There is no explanation for this

> anamoly and the same will continue.

> So by doing vazhipadus and offerings the temple coffers can be filled

> up but not lead one to Real Bhakthy.Was there such a system during the

> days of Bhattathiri and Poonthanam?Because those days they had so much

> love and

> devotion to God and never bothered abt other things..Now the trend has

> changed and money takes the upper hand over Real Bhakthy.What a pity?

>

> If anybody is offended by these comments I express regret as I hv only

> stated what I felt and to enforce the fact that Bhakthy has nothing to

> do with the so

> called offerings and the same depends on individual choices and not on

> the

> choice of people running temple administration.

>

>

> Hare Krishna.

>

>

> */hba9331 <pravin9/* wrote:

>

> Om Namo Narayanaya

> A very good topic to discuss on this forum. Everybody should

> earnestly participate...since there are bound to be various

> questions coming up in our mind...one such question I have

>

> It was discussed in one of the Books of AMMA that Guruvayoor does

> not need any of our material offerings in cash or kind, all those

> goes to the funding account. But if the below concept is followed it

> would be very difficult to maintain the temple and the

> infrastructure needed and the salary to be paid to various employee.

> We in Kerala do not have the concept of KARSEVA as with the Sikh

> community where free service is also an offering. The give and take

> concept if discouraged would have far reaching consequence on the

> day to day working of such institution...I have my own doubts if the

> Hindu system would work purely on the Bakthi concept. Currently when

> some bad time falls on us, we run to Guruvayoorappan, same way as a

> child runs to his/her parents when they are in trouble or even when

> they have a bad dream...but since we are not kids we feel it would

> not be fair to go empty handed so promise Guruvayoorappan certain

> Vazipadu....more over even the Vazipadus are classified into do this

> and you get this..do that and that for good health...etc..

>

> I shall be very thankful if these doubts are cleared by the good

> members in our forum.

>

> Narayana Narayana.....

>

> Pravin

>

> guruvayur

> <guruvayur%40>, " K.V Gopalakrishna "

> <gopalakrishna.kv wrote:

> >

> > Dear Mataji,

> > Radhe Krishna!

> >

> > I agree with you one hundred per cent. With due regard to what

> Shri

> > Ganapathy Raman and Krishna Prasad have said, in some cases, it is

> a

> > fact that complacency creeps in when one acquires the object he

> has been

> > longing for. This complacency makes him too jubilant, raising

> his ego

> > level so high, that he forgets for a time, that what he has

> acquired is

> > by divine grace also. I have deliberately added the word " also "

> > because many people think that one's hard work was responsible for

> his

> > upliftment in life, or that it was the cleverness of the doctor

> and the

> > efficacy of the medicine that has cured him. I would like to

> reiterate

> > here that hard work is definitely required to be done if one wants

> to

> > come up in life. Similarly, the doctor's experience and the

> efficacy

> > of the medicine play a very important part in curing the

> disease. But

> > all these require divine grace to have their effect. Without

> that, no

> > medicine will work, and any amount of hard work will not pay.

> People

> > have the habit of blaming God when something wrong happens without

> > realising that the bad that has happened is result of one's own

> Karma.

> > Let us not forget that even to think of God, His grace is

> required.

> > " Iswaranugrahad eva bhakthirbhavathi Kesave! "

> >

> > Promising to perform a particular " vazhipadu " to God if He favours

> etc.,

> > like performing a " Tulabharam " if one gets cured of his ailment

> etc., is

> > an inferior type of Bhakti. On the face of the person's promise

> and

> > cure of the disease, it may look as though the person got cured

> because

> > of the promise made. But really speaking, it is not so. It is

> the

> > person's belief on one side and the fruits of Karma on the other

> cured

> > him. The Lord will accept anything if offered with Bhakti.

> But what

> > He wants is Bhakti and Bhakti alone.

> >

> > Regards

> > KVG.

> >

> >

> > Saroja Ramanujam wrote:

> >

> > > Well said Gopalakrishnan!

> > > I think that perhaps it is relevant here to examine the

> following

> > > sloka from Gita.

> > >

> > > Chathurvidhaa bajanthe maamjanaah sukrthino arjuna

> > > aatho jignaasurarthaartheejnaanee cha bharathrshbha

> > > Krishna says,

> > > 'Four types of devotees of noble deeds worship Me, Arjuna,the

> seeker

> > > after worldly possessions, the afflicted,the seeker for

> knowledge and

> > > the man of wisdom, O best of Bharathas A man who believes in God

> prays

> > > for the fulfilment of his cherished objects of the world,wealth

> or

> > > child and so on. When he gets them as a result of his prayer his

> > > devotion is strengthened and develops into faith.If he has not

> already

> > > acquired faith he will lose belief if his desire is not

> fulfilled.This

> > > is why we often hear the cry 'I no more believe in God,' from

> those

> > > who face disappointments in life.

> > > Sugreeva and dhruva can be cited as examples of arthaarthee type

> of

> > > devotees, the former devoloped faith after the fulfilment of his

> > > desire while Dhruva had both faith and beliefand became a jnani

> later,

> > > elevated to the status of dhruva star.

> > > The second kind of devotee who seeks God as his sole refuge when

> in

> > > distress like Droupadi or Gajendra are aarthees with staunch

> faith

> > > that He alone is their saviour, which is termed as

> mahavisvasam ,among

> > > the five requisites of saranagathi. They do not seek Him for

> worldly

> > > pleasures but remain ardent devotees through out their life

> which

> > > alone will make them call out to Him in earnest.In normal life

> we do

> > > not have that faith in God eventhough we have belief in Him and

> > > therefore we suffer in consequenceHere comes the importance of

> the

> > > word 'sukrthinah' which Krishna uses to describe the four kinds

> of

> > > devotees. To think of God and yearn for His mercy requires

> > > poorvajanmapunya. There is a story to illustrate this.

> > > A man who was a confirmed sinner was sitting on a tree and Lord

> Siva

> > > happened to pass that way with Parvathi. Siva told Parvathi that

> the

> > > man is going to fall from the tree and die since it is his fate.

> > > Parvathi, being the divine mother, took pity on the man and said

> that

> > > they should save him to which Siva replied that it was his karma

> being

> > > a sinner to die such a death.When Parvathi remonstrated with him

> Siva

> > > said that He will save the man if he cries out 'appa' and she

> should

> > > save him if he says 'amma' when he falls. Parvathi was happy

> without

> > > realising the real purport of Siva's words.The branch on which

> the man

> > > was sitting broke and he fell down crying'aiyo,' because he did

> not

> > > have the sukrthi to call God's name at the time of death

> > > Jignasu is one who has pure devotion and does not seek the

> pleasures

> > > of life nor is he worried about distress because the only thing

> that

> > > could cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and

> to

> > > acertain extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of

> Bhakthi. A

> > > jignasu who has pure devotion and does not seek the pleasures of

> life

> > > nor is he worried about distress because the only thing that

> could

> > > cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and to

> acertain

> > > extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A

> jignasu

> > > loves the Lord for his own sake and seeks to acquire the jnana

> which

> > > the Lord Himself gives as in the case of Udhdhava or through

> someone

> > > as He did for Parikshit.

> > >

> > > The last but not least is the jnani who has realised the truth

> about

> > > the Lord like Prahlada, Narada and other sages who were both

> bhakthas

> > > and jnanis.

> > >

> > > Besides, Ramanuja says in his sribhashya,

> > > 'dhyAnam cha thailadhArAvath avicchinna smrthisanthAna roopam,'

> > > continous flow of remembrance like the stream of continously

> dropping

> > > oil. 'DhruvA smrthih ;smrthilambhe sarvagranTheenAm

> > > vipramokshah,'(Chan.7-26-2) when the constant,dhruva,

> remembrance,

> > > smrthih is attained all knots are rent asunder. Thus

> DHruvAsmrthi is

> > > prescribed as the means of liberation

> > >

> > >

> > > Saroja Ramanujam

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > .

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > May god bless you,

> > >

> > > Dr. Saroja Ramanujam, M.A., Ph.D, Siromani in

> sanskrit.

> > >

> > >

> > > -------------------------

> -------

> > >

> > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail Beta.

> > >

> <http://us.rd./evt=40791/*http://advision.webevents..co

> <http://us.rd./evt=40791/*http://advision.webevents..co>

> m/handraisers>

> > >

> > >

> >

>

>

> ------

> India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new Click

> here

>

<http://us.rd./mail/in/mailanswersshare/*http://in.answers./>

> Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click here

>

<http://us.rd./mail/in/mailfifa/*http://in.sports./football/fo\

otball_fifa.html>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Gopalakrishnaji Thank you for the valuable information Regards Syamala"K.V Gopalakrishna" <gopalakrishna.kv wrote: Dear Pravin,Radhe Krishna!Your point is very valid. It is said that when one goes to see god, children, old people and sick ones, one should not go empty-handed. the same principle applies when one visits Guruvayoorappan also. One can put money in the Hundi which will go for the upkeep and day to day expenses of the temple, feeding poor

devotees, and so on and so forth. One can perform vazhipadus as token of one's Bhakti which the Lord will be only too pleased to accept. Unbelievers do ask questions like "God does not accept your gifts physically, nor does He take any neivedyam you offer, so why take to Him?" This is no argument. Because, although God has not physically eaten all the Prasadam, He has blessed it, and any devotee who eats that Prasadam will certainly be benefitted. There are, stories in our mythology that He has physically accepted and eaten the neivedyam when the Unni Namboodiri who was too innocent cried.Similary, one may argue that God is the giver to all. He is the creator. How can one offer to Him, the same things He has created ? One should remember that it is not just the material value of the offering that counts; it is the Bhakti which goes along with that. Has He not said in Bhagavad gita to Arjuna and in Bhagavatam to

Uddhava and Kuchela, " Patram Pushpam Phalam Toyam, yo me Bhaktya prayacchati, thadaham bhaktyupahritam asnami prayatatmanaha". (Whoever offers me with love, a leaf, a flower, a fruit, or even water, I accept and enjoy that offering of love by that man of purified intellect.)..Does He not know that all the four commodities He has listed were created by Him?. Did He not grab what Kuchela was hiding under his arm-pit, being too shy to offer the beaten rice he had brought? Did He not eat that beaten rice that Bhakta had brought, with avarice, as if He has not seen beaten rice before? and that too, that beaten rice bundled up in a rag and soaked in Kuchela's sweat? Does it not show His love and fondness for His devotees? For the Lord, nothing is more important than the devotee, and nothing dearer than devotion, which is the most intense form of love.( Prematmaka-bhakti.) So there is nothing absolutely wrong in

making offerings to GodWhat I meant as inferior form of Bhakti was the devotee promising the Lord, "Lord! Cure my child's sickness-- I will offer you Tulabharam--" Many people do, do this sort of promise without thinking that they are trying to barter with the Lord! One can't blame them, as it has become part of our culture, under the name of "nercha", which, to me, looks odd.LoveKVG.hba9331 wrote:> Om Namo Narayanaya> A very good topic to discuss on this forum. Everybody should> earnestly participate...since there are bound to be various> questions coming up in our mind...one such question I have>> It was discussed in one of the Books of AMMA that Guruvayoor does> not need any of our material offerings in cash or kind, all those> goes to the funding account. But if the below concept is followed it> would be very difficult to maintain the temple and

the> infrastructure needed and the salary to be paid to various employee.> We in Kerala do not have the concept of KARSEVA as with the Sikh> community where free service is also an offering. The give and take> concept if discouraged would have far reaching consequence on the> day to day working of such institution...I have my own doubts if the> Hindu system would work purely on the Bakthi concept. Currently when> some bad time falls on us, we run to Guruvayoorappan, same way as a> child runs to his/her parents when they are in trouble or even when> they have a bad dream...but since we are not kids we feel it would> not be fair to go empty handed so promise Guruvayoorappan certain> Vazipadu....more over even the Vazipadus are classified into do this> and you get this..do that and that for good health...etc..>> I shall be very thankful if these doubts are cleared

by the good> members in our forum.>> Narayana Narayana.....>> Pravin>> guruvayur <guruvayur%40>, > "K.V Gopalakrishna"> <gopalakrishna.kv wrote:> >> > Dear Mataji,> > Radhe Krishna!> >> > I agree with you one hundred per cent. With due regard to what> Shri> > Ganapathy Raman and Krishna Prasad have said, in some cases, it is> a> > fact that complacency creeps in when one acquires the object he> has been> > longing for. This complacency makes him too jubilant, raising> his ego> > level so high, that he forgets for a time, that what he has> acquired is> > by divine grace also. I have deliberately added the word "also"> > because many

people think that one's hard work was responsible for> his> > upliftment in life, or that it was the cleverness of the doctor> and the> > efficacy of the medicine that has cured him. I would like to> reiterate> > here that hard work is definitely required to be done if one wants> to> > come up in life. Similarly, the doctor's experience and the> efficacy> > of the medicine play a very important part in curing the> disease. But> > all these require divine grace to have their effect. Without> that, no> > medicine will work, and any amount of hard work will not pay.> People> > have the habit of blaming God when something wrong happens without> > realising that the bad that has happened is result of one's own> Karma.> > Let us not forget that even to think of God, His grace is> required.> >

"Iswaranugrahad eva bhakthirbhavathi Kesave!"> >> > Promising to perform a particular "vazhipadu" to God if He favours> etc.,> > like performing a "Tulabharam" if one gets cured of his ailment> etc., is> > an inferior type of Bhakti. On the face of the person's promise> and> > cure of the disease, it may look as though the person got cured> because> > of the promise made. But really speaking, it is not so. It is> the> > person's belief on one side and the fruits of Karma on the other> cured> > him. The Lord will accept anything if offered with Bhakti.> But what> > He wants is Bhakti and Bhakti alone.> >> > Regards> > KVG.> >> >> > Saroja Ramanujam wrote:> >> > > Well said Gopalakrishnan!> > > I think that perhaps it is relevant here to

examine the> following> > > sloka from Gita.> > >> > > Chathurvidhaa bajanthe maamjanaah sukrthino arjuna> > > aatho jignaasurarthaartheejnaanee cha bharathrshbha> > > Krishna says,> > > 'Four types of devotees of noble deeds worship Me, Arjuna,the> seeker> > > after worldly possessions, the afflicted,the seeker for> knowledge and> > > the man of wisdom, O best of Bharathas A man who believes in God> prays> > > for the fulfilment of his cherished objects of the world,wealth> or> > > child and so on. When he gets them as a result of his prayer his> > > devotion is strengthened and develops into faith.If he has not> already> > > acquired faith he will lose belief if his desire is not> fulfilled.This> > > is why we often hear the cry 'I no more believe in

God,' from> those> > > who face disappointments in life.> > > Sugreeva and dhruva can be cited as examples of arthaarthee type> of> > > devotees, the former devoloped faith after the fulfilment of his> > > desire while Dhruva had both faith and beliefand became a jnani> later,> > > elevated to the status of dhruva star.> > > The second kind of devotee who seeks God as his sole refuge when> in> > > distress like Droupadi or Gajendra are aarthees with staunch> faith> > > that He alone is their saviour, which is termed as> mahavisvasam ,among> > > the five requisites of saranagathi. They do not seek Him for> worldly> > > pleasures but remain ardent devotees through out their life> which> > > alone will make them call out to Him in earnest.In normal life> we do> >

> not have that faith in God eventhough we have belief in Him and> > > therefore we suffer in consequenceHere comes the importance of> the> > > word 'sukrthinah' which Krishna uses to describe the four kinds> of> > > devotees. To think of God and yearn for His mercy requires> > > poorvajanmapunya. There is a story to illustrate this.> > > A man who was a confirmed sinner was sitting on a tree and Lord> Siva> > > happened to pass that way with Parvathi. Siva told Parvathi that> the> > > man is going to fall from the tree and die since it is his fate.> > > Parvathi, being the divine mother, took pity on the man and said> that> > > they should save him to which Siva replied that it was his karma> being> > > a sinner to die such a death.When Parvathi remonstrated with him> Siva> > >

said that He will save the man if he cries out 'appa' and she> should> > > save him if he says 'amma' when he falls. Parvathi was happy> without> > > realising the real purport of Siva's words.The branch on which> the man> > > was sitting broke and he fell down crying'aiyo,' because he did> not> > > have the sukrthi to call God's name at the time of death> > > Jignasu is one who has pure devotion and does not seek the> pleasures> > > of life nor is he worried about distress because the only thing> that> > > could cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and> to> > > acertain extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of> Bhakthi. A> > > jignasu who has pure devotion and does not seek the pleasures of> life> > > nor is he worried about distress because the only

thing that> could> > > cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and to> acertain> > > extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A> jignasu> > > loves the Lord for his own sake and seeks to acquire the jnana> which> > > the Lord Himself gives as in the case of Udhdhava or through> someone> > > as He did for Parikshit.> > >> > > The last but not least is the jnani who has realised the truth> about> > > the Lord like Prahlada, Narada and other sages who were both> bhakthas> > > and jnanis.> > >> > > Besides, Ramanuja says in his sribhashya,> > > 'dhyAnam cha thailadhArAvath avicchinna smrthisanthAna roopam,'> > > continous flow of remembrance like the stream of continously> dropping> > > oil. 'DhruvA smrthih

;smrthilambhe sarvagranTheenAm> > > vipramokshah,'(Chan.7-26-2) when the constant,dhruva,> remembrance,> > > smrthih is attained all knots are rent asunder. Thus> DHruvAsmrthi is> > > prescribed as the means of liberation> > >> > >> > > Saroja Ramanujam> > >> > >> > >> > > .> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > May god bless you,> > >> > > Dr. Saroja Ramanujam, M.A., Ph.D, Siromani in> sanskrit.> > >> > >> > > -------------------------> -------> > > > > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail Beta.> > >> <http://us.rd./evt=40791/*http://advision.webevents..co > <http://us.rd./evt=40791/*http://advision.webevents..co>> m/handraisers>> > >> > >> >>>

How low will we go? Check out Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Om Namo Narayana !!!

 

Dear Friends and Devotees of Lord Guruvayoorappan!

 

To justify our stand on any subject, we say that God

do not like that thing; God always like this thing

etc. etc. . Who has given us authority to say that

what God Like and what do not and how we know what God

expect from us. So, what we can do is to follow the

path of God. God has always stood by justice; he has

always helped those who are helpless. Mahabharata,

Ramayana and Bhagavat Geetha teach us about this.

So let us also do the same. Let us raise our voice

against injustice, let us help the poor, and let us

spread the message for people to live harmoniously.

 

We give offering to God. It is not anything what we

give to him in return of his blessings. It is like

this: In our family, our parents take care of us, they

love us. Even if we don’t give anything to them, they

love and look after us. They help us whenever we need

their support. Still, we give them some Gift on

special occasions, like Onam, Vishu etc. That is the

way to express our deep love towards them, even if it

is a small gift, they accept it wholeheartedly.

Offering to God by its devotees is also like this. It

is a small gift to God to express their true devotion.

 

 

 

May God Bless All, May God Guide us.

 

 

--- GANAPATHY RAMAN <agraman62 wrote:

 

>

>

> Of course for running the temple,paying salary etc

> money is required but the point is who are the

> persons chalking out the various vazhipadus and

> fixing rates?The temple authorities and not God.If

> the temple authorities say that to

> run the temple money is required and hence donate

> your might they won't get

> much but if they exhibit in boards that such and

> such vazhipadus can bring this and that benefit

> people are glad to contribute whether the same

> materialises or

> not and so the authorities are trying to display a

> long list to collect funds in this way which has

> nothing to do with Bhakthy or God.This trend has

> become in vogue during the past decades

> only.Centuries back there were no such things.

>

> Temples like Guruvayur or Sabarimala or Tripati

> attract devotees in millions and

> in this way the coffers also can overflow by the

> so called vazhipadus.A devotee

> is happy iif he does some thulabharam with sugar

> or plantain or anything by paying the rates fixed by

> the administration thinking that God is pleased with

> his offering, and the administration is happy that

> their bank balances increase which

> can be utilised and misutilised for various

> things.This is actually what is happening in big

> temples.On the otherhand there are innumerable

> temples which don't hv any income even to offer

> neivedyam to the Deity or having enough oil even to

> light the lamps.Why the devotees don't flock to

> those temples also and

> do the vazhipadus so that those temples too can

> see the light of the day.Is

> Guruvayurappan sits only in Guruvayur or Sastha

> sits only in Sabarimalai when

> the all pervading God is in every atom and every

> idol why some temples flourish and some suffer?Does

> that mean that people who go to those less fortunate

>

> temples are not devotees?In Tripati there is a

> custom that everyday whatever

> money and other offerings come will be accounted

> before the Deity in the night

> but it is not known how the money is being spent

> and whether the Deity gives permission for all the

> expenses?There was even an attempt years back that

> the

> amounts collected shuld be invested in Govt bonds

> thereby diverting the funds of the temple but due to

> the protest of the devotees the idea was shelved.

>

> There is noting wrong in collecting money for the

> administration of temple by

> means like vazhipadus but that can't be connected

> with Bhakthy as there is no

> sanction from the Deity for the same and it is

> only the temple administration fixes the same.Years

> back in GVR udayasthamana pooja was fixed at Rs.5000

> but now I don't know the amount but certainly it

> must be 50000 and what is the

> guidelines for fixing such exhorbitant rates?The

> temple administration members enjoy in all comforts

> from the so called collections and that too

> everybody knows.Then how this collection can be

> linked to ardent Bhakthy?Did the

> Deity of GVR or Sabarimala told the administration

> to collect so much money?

> So in the name of God all these are made.In a

> country like India with more than a billion people

> there is always the tendency to resort to

> superstitions in beliefs

> and the eagerness to know abt the future thru

> astrology.If there is something

> wrong immediately it is decided to conduct an

> ashtamangalya prasna is conducted.The astrologers

> say that God is furious because the surroundings are

> polluted and the devotees are not havig proper

> devotion,roads are not good and all such things.When

> the same is said by media and people nobody bothers

> and when the astrologers say that God is angry

> immedately steps are taken to ward

> off evils supposed to happen if the same are not

> done.Are they not looking funny?

>

> My intention is not to fnd fault with anything

> that is going on which everybody knows but the

> pertinent thing is that for a Bhaktha such things

> appear to be superfluous and when so many temples ae

> suffering for lack of funs why certain important

> temples alone take the cakes when we accept that God

> is everywhere.There is no explanation for this

> anamoly and the same will continue.

> So by doing vazhipadus and offerings the temple

> coffers can be filled up but not lead one to Real

> Bhakthy.Was there such a system during the days of

> Bhattathiri and Poonthanam?Because those days they

> had so much love and

> devotion to God and never bothered abt other

> things..Now the trend has changed and money takes

> the upper hand over Real Bhakthy.What a pity?

>

> If anybody is offended by these comments I express

> regret as I hv only stated what I felt and to

> enforce the fact that Bhakthy has nothing to do with

> the so

> called offerings and the same depends on

> individual choices and not on the

> choice of people running temple administration.

>

>

> Hare Krishna.

>

>

> hba9331 <pravin9 wrote:

> Om Namo Narayanaya

> A very good topic to discuss on this forum.

> Everybody should

> earnestly participate...since there are bound to be

> various

> questions coming up in our mind...one such question

> I have

>

> It was discussed in one of the Books of AMMA that

> Guruvayoor does

> not need any of our material offerings in cash or

> kind, all those

> goes to the funding account. But if the below

> concept is followed it

> would be very difficult to maintain the temple and

> the

> infrastructure needed and the salary to be paid to

> various employee.

> We in Kerala do not have the concept of KARSEVA as

> with the Sikh

> community where free service is also an offering.

> The give and take

> concept if discouraged would have far reaching

> consequence on the

> day to day working of such institution...I have my

> own doubts if the

> Hindu system would work purely on the Bakthi

> concept. Currently when

> some bad time falls on us, we run to

> Guruvayoorappan, same way as a

> child runs to his/her parents when they are in

> trouble or even when

> they have a bad dream...but since we are not kids we

> feel it would

> not be fair to go empty handed so promise

> Guruvayoorappan certain

> Vazipadu....more over even the Vazipadus are

> classified into do this

> and you get this..do that and that for good

> health...etc..

>

> I shall be very thankful if these doubts are cleared

> by the good

> members in our forum.

>

> Narayana Narayana.....

>

> Pravin

>

> guruvayur , " K.V

> Gopalakrishna "

> <gopalakrishna.kv wrote:

> >

> > Dear Mataji,

> > Radhe Krishna!

> >

> > I agree with you one hundred per cent. With due

> regard to what

> Shri

> > Ganapathy Raman and Krishna Prasad have said, in

> some cases, it is

> a

> > fact that complacency creeps in when one acquires

> the object he

> has been

> > longing for. This complacency makes him too

> jubilant, raising

> his ego

> > level so high, that he forgets for a time, that

> what he has

> acquired is

> > by divine grace also. I have deliberately added

> the word " also "

> > because many people think that one's hard work was

> responsible for

> his

> > upliftment in life, or that it was the cleverness

> of the doctor

> and the

> > efficacy of the medicine that has cured him. I

> would like to

> reiterate

> > here that hard work is definitely required to be

> done

=== message truncated ===

 

 

 

 

________

India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new

http://in.answers./

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Sri Guruvayoorappan saranam,

 

A devotee is an instrument of the Bhagavan Sri Krishna ; and it is

the Lord's power that is acting through him/her. It is quite natural

that , a devotee is grateful to the Bhagavan for His kindness ; and

is always pleased to offer something in return.

 

It is easy to criticise the Temple working systems in place , but

difficult to run it . There is no need for the devotee to worry about

the running of temple because Bhagavan is there to take care through

His own ways and means.

 

The religious institutions of non-Hindu religions don't have any

public accountabilty whereas the Devaswam Boards are accountable to

Government. Most of the small temples are run from the income of

Guruvayoor and Sabarimala.

 

So let us be positive in our approach . Don't worry, be happy!!!!

Just chant Om Namo Narayanaya and leave the rest to Bhagavan.

 

A Bhaktan

 

 

 

 

 

guruvayur , GANAPATHY RAMAN <agraman62

wrote:

>

>

>

> Of course for running the temple,paying salary etc money is

required but the point is who are the persons chalking out the

various vazhipadus and fixing rates?The temple authorities and not

God.If the temple authorities say that to

> run the temple money is required and hence donate your might they

won't get

> much but if they exhibit in boards that such and such vazhipadus

can bring this and that benefit people are glad to contribute whether

the same materialises or

> not and so the authorities are trying to display a long list to

collect funds in this way which has nothing to do with Bhakthy or

God.This trend has become in vogue during the past decades

only.Centuries back there were no such things.

>

> Temples like Guruvayur or Sabarimala or Tripati attract devotees

in millions and

> in this way the coffers also can overflow by the so called

vazhipadus.A devotee

> is happy iif he does some thulabharam with sugar or plantain or

anything by paying the rates fixed by the administration thinking

that God is pleased with his offering, and the administration is

happy that their bank balances increase which

> can be utilised and misutilised for various things.This is

actually what is happening in big temples.On the otherhand there are

innumerable temples which don't hv any income even to offer neivedyam

to the Deity or having enough oil even to light the lamps.Why the

devotees don't flock to those temples also and

> do the vazhipadus so that those temples too can see the light of

the day.Is

> Guruvayurappan sits only in Guruvayur or Sastha sits only in

Sabarimalai when

> the all pervading God is in every atom and every idol why some

temples flourish and some suffer?Does that mean that people who go to

those less fortunate

> temples are not devotees?In Tripati there is a custom that

everyday whatever

> money and other offerings come will be accounted before the Deity

in the night

> but it is not known how the money is being spent and whether the

Deity gives permission for all the expenses?There was even an attempt

years back that the

> amounts collected shuld be invested in Govt bonds thereby

diverting the funds of the temple but due to the protest of the

devotees the idea was shelved.

>

> There is noting wrong in collecting money for the administration

of temple by

> means like vazhipadus but that can't be connected with Bhakthy as

there is no

> sanction from the Deity for the same and it is only the temple

administration fixes the same.Years back in GVR udayasthamana pooja

was fixed at Rs.5000

> but now I don't know the amount but certainly it must be 50000

and what is the

> guidelines for fixing such exhorbitant rates?The temple

administration members enjoy in all comforts from the so called

collections and that too everybody knows.Then how this collection can

be linked to ardent Bhakthy?Did the

> Deity of GVR or Sabarimala told the administration to collect so

much money?

> So in the name of God all these are made.In a country like India

with more than a billion people there is always the tendency to

resort to superstitions in beliefs

> and the eagerness to know abt the future thru astrology.If there

is something

> wrong immediately it is decided to conduct an ashtamangalya

prasna is conducted.The astrologers say that God is furious because

the surroundings are polluted and the devotees are not havig proper

devotion,roads are not good and all such things.When the same is said

by media and people nobody bothers and when the astrologers say that

God is angry immedately steps are taken to ward

> off evils supposed to happen if the same are not done.Are they

not looking funny?

>

> My intention is not to fnd fault with anything that is going on

which everybody knows but the pertinent thing is that for a Bhaktha

such things appear to be superfluous and when so many temples ae

suffering for lack of funs why certain important temples alone take

the cakes when we accept that God is everywhere.There is no

explanation for this anamoly and the same will continue.

> So by doing vazhipadus and offerings the temple coffers can be

filled up but not lead one to Real Bhakthy.Was there such a system

during the days of Bhattathiri and Poonthanam?Because those days they

had so much love and

> devotion to God and never bothered abt other things..Now the

trend has changed and money takes the upper hand over Real

Bhakthy.What a pity?

>

> If anybody is offended by these comments I express regret as I hv

only stated what I felt and to enforce the fact that Bhakthy has

nothing to do with the so

> called offerings and the same depends on individual choices and

not on the

> choice of people running temple administration.

>

>

> Hare Krishna.

>

>

> hba9331 <pravin9 wrote:

> Om Namo Narayanaya

> A very good topic to discuss on this forum. Everybody should

> earnestly participate...since there are bound to be various

> questions coming up in our mind...one such question I have

>

> It was discussed in one of the Books of AMMA that Guruvayoor does

> not need any of our material offerings in cash or kind, all those

> goes to the funding account. But if the below concept is followed

it

> would be very difficult to maintain the temple and the

> infrastructure needed and the salary to be paid to various

employee.

> We in Kerala do not have the concept of KARSEVA as with the Sikh

> community where free service is also an offering. The give and take

> concept if discouraged would have far reaching consequence on the

> day to day working of such institution...I have my own doubts if

the

> Hindu system would work purely on the Bakthi concept. Currently

when

> some bad time falls on us, we run to Guruvayoorappan, same way as a

> child runs to his/her parents when they are in trouble or even when

> they have a bad dream...but since we are not kids we feel it would

> not be fair to go empty handed so promise Guruvayoorappan certain

> Vazipadu....more over even the Vazipadus are classified into do

this

> and you get this..do that and that for good health...etc..

>

> I shall be very thankful if these doubts are cleared by the good

> members in our forum.

>

> Narayana Narayana.....

>

> Pravin

>

> guruvayur , " K.V Gopalakrishna "

> <gopalakrishna.kv@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Mataji,

> > Radhe Krishna!

> >

> > I agree with you one hundred per cent. With due regard to what

> Shri

> > Ganapathy Raman and Krishna Prasad have said, in some cases, it

is

> a

> > fact that complacency creeps in when one acquires the object he

> has been

> > longing for. This complacency makes him too jubilant, raising

> his ego

> > level so high, that he forgets for a time, that what he has

> acquired is

> > by divine grace also. I have deliberately added the word " also "

> > because many people think that one's hard work was responsible

for

> his

> > upliftment in life, or that it was the cleverness of the doctor

> and the

> > efficacy of the medicine that has cured him. I would like to

> reiterate

> > here that hard work is definitely required to be done if one

wants

> to

> > come up in life. Similarly, the doctor's experience and the

> efficacy

> > of the medicine play a very important part in curing the

> disease. But

> > all these require divine grace to have their effect. Without

> that, no

> > medicine will work, and any amount of hard work will not pay.

> People

> > have the habit of blaming God when something wrong happens

without

> > realising that the bad that has happened is result of one's own

> Karma.

> > Let us not forget that even to think of God, His grace is

> required.

> > " Iswaranugrahad eva bhakthirbhavathi Kesave! "

> >

> > Promising to perform a particular " vazhipadu " to God if He

favours

> etc.,

> > like performing a " Tulabharam " if one gets cured of his ailment

> etc., is

> > an inferior type of Bhakti. On the face of the person's promise

> and

> > cure of the disease, it may look as though the person got cured

> because

> > of the promise made. But really speaking, it is not so. It is

> the

> > person's belief on one side and the fruits of Karma on the other

> cured

> > him. The Lord will accept anything if offered with Bhakti.

> But what

> > He wants is Bhakti and Bhakti alone.

> >

> > Regards

> > KVG.

> >

> >

> > Saroja Ramanujam wrote:

> >

> > > Well said Gopalakrishnan!

> > > I think that perhaps it is relevant here to examine the

> following

> > > sloka from Gita.

> > >

> > > Chathurvidhaa bajanthe maamjanaah sukrthino arjuna

> > > aatho jignaasurarthaartheejnaanee cha bharathrshbha

> > > Krishna says,

> > > 'Four types of devotees of noble deeds worship Me, Arjuna,the

> seeker

> > > after worldly possessions, the afflicted,the seeker for

> knowledge and

> > > the man of wisdom, O best of Bharathas A man who believes in

God

> prays

> > > for the fulfilment of his cherished objects of the world,wealth

> or

> > > child and so on. When he gets them as a result of his prayer

his

> > > devotion is strengthened and develops into faith.If he has not

> already

> > > acquired faith he will lose belief if his desire is not

> fulfilled.This

> > > is why we often hear the cry 'I no more believe in God,' from

> those

> > > who face disappointments in life.

> > > Sugreeva and dhruva can be cited as examples of arthaarthee

type

> of

> > > devotees, the former devoloped faith after the fulfilment of

his

> > > desire while Dhruva had both faith and beliefand became a jnani

> later,

> > > elevated to the status of dhruva star.

> > > The second kind of devotee who seeks God as his sole refuge

when

> in

> > > distress like Droupadi or Gajendra are aarthees with staunch

> faith

> > > that He alone is their saviour, which is termed as

> mahavisvasam ,among

> > > the five requisites of saranagathi. They do not seek Him for

> worldly

> > > pleasures but remain ardent devotees through out their life

> which

> > > alone will make them call out to Him in earnest.In normal life

> we do

> > > not have that faith in God eventhough we have belief in Him and

> > > therefore we suffer in consequenceHere comes the importance of

> the

> > > word 'sukrthinah' which Krishna uses to describe the four kinds

> of

> > > devotees. To think of God and yearn for His mercy requires

> > > poorvajanmapunya. There is a story to illustrate this.

> > > A man who was a confirmed sinner was sitting on a tree and Lord

> Siva

> > > happened to pass that way with Parvathi. Siva told Parvathi

that

> the

> > > man is going to fall from the tree and die since it is his

fate.

> > > Parvathi, being the divine mother, took pity on the man and

said

> that

> > > they should save him to which Siva replied that it was his

karma

> being

> > > a sinner to die such a death.When Parvathi remonstrated with

him

> Siva

> > > said that He will save the man if he cries out 'appa' and she

> should

> > > save him if he says 'amma' when he falls. Parvathi was happy

> without

> > > realising the real purport of Siva's words.The branch on which

> the man

> > > was sitting broke and he fell down crying'aiyo,' because he did

> not

> > > have the sukrthi to call God's name at the time of death

> > > Jignasu is one who has pure devotion and does not seek the

> pleasures

> > > of life nor is he worried about distress because the only thing

> that

> > > could cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava

and

> to

> > > acertain extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of

> Bhakthi. A

> > > jignasu who has pure devotion and does not seek the pleasures

of

> life

> > > nor is he worried about distress because the only thing that

> could

> > > cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and to

> acertain

> > > extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A

> jignasu

> > > loves the Lord for his own sake and seeks to acquire the jnana

> which

> > > the Lord Himself gives as in the case of Udhdhava or through

> someone

> > > as He did for Parikshit.

> > >

> > > The last but not least is the jnani who has realised the truth

> about

> > > the Lord like Prahlada, Narada and other sages who were both

> bhakthas

> > > and jnanis.

> > >

> > > Besides, Ramanuja says in his sribhashya,

> > > 'dhyAnam cha thailadhArAvath avicchinna smrthisanthAna roopam,'

> > > continous flow of remembrance like the stream of continously

> dropping

> > > oil. 'DhruvA smrthih ;smrthilambhe sarvagranTheenAm

> > > vipramokshah,'(Chan.7-26-2) when the constant,dhruva,

> remembrance,

> > > smrthih is attained all knots are rent asunder. Thus

> DHruvAsmrthi is

> > > prescribed as the means of liberation

> > >

> > >

> > > Saroja Ramanujam

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > .

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > May god bless you,

> > >

> > > Dr. Saroja Ramanujam, M.A., Ph.D, Siromani in

> sanskrit.

> > >

> > >

> > > -------------------------

> -------

> > >

> > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail Beta.

> > >

>

<http://us.rd./evt=40791/*http://advision.webevents..co

> m/handraisers>

> > >

> > >

> >

 

> India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new

Click here

> Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click here

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Krishnadaya, It is quite some time that you hv not been heard in this Group.Here the question is not that of how the temples are administered or how the offerings of devotees are utilised or what interests the devotees to make such offerings.As said that depends on individual choices and there is no need to interfere.But regarding the amounts collected by way of vazhipadus and how they are utilised nobody knows and that is also not our concern.The point is how such things can be correlated to the Bakthy concept?Do you wish to say that by offerings even though with full heart could be construed as Bhakthy?There are hundreds of people who just dump money in the hundi which has become a custom and not a way of expressing Bhakthy.I hv seen in all the big temples .big bundles of notes are deposited in the hundi and do you think that can be termed as bhakthy?or is it some type of bargaining?There are

hundreds of people who never bother to contribute even token amounts to many deserving cases like the Deaf and Dumb society,Blind society,Charitable institutions who run providing succour to the orphans but they are prepared to put waddles of currencies in the hundis and as offerings as if God is in need of that.Why this change in their minds?Instead of dumping money in the hundis if they spend at least a portion to the needy,distressed people will not that bring them the Grace of God as all are His children and due to karma effects they hv born to suffer and giving them a helping hand,will not that please the God?It is said Manavaseva is Madhavaseva-when that is eloquently drummed up in platforms are all practicing the same?By dumping money for the sake of upliftment of temples which are already very rich what purpose does it serve when the teeming millions suffer in desolation and despair?Do you not think

that have nots shuld be protected by those who hv the money power in the interest of God as all are His creatures? Due to good karmas in the earlier births one may possess lot of wealth but shuld not the person think that the same shuld be distributed at least a portion to the needy? I am not a preacher but I say from practical point of view and not to offend anybody.I know you hv enough knowledge to understand what I mean?You are also doing a great service and that too I know in your own way which is surely laudable.As a Krishna bhaktha you shuld hv the compassion to the down trodden also.Of course the whole world can't be made into a paradise overnight by doling out to the needy people but those who do even a bit will surely enjoy great peace and the Grace of God as He is not for the rich and vainglorious people but for the poor,unsung people as He has demonstrated in

the case of Kuchela.If the devotee is the instrument of Bhagawan Krishna whyshuld He make him to be a slave to the material gains without thinking abt His own brothers and sisters who are also the instruments of Him.So that argument carries no weight.It s because there is an element of ego in the minds of His instruments also which even He finds it difficult to dilute.Again you say that Bhagawan will take care of running the temples.In what way?Is He the chairman of the administrative board?or is He giving directions?In your estimate how many temples come under the purview of GVR and Sabarimala temples?Are all the temples properly taken care of by the Boards of the GVR and Sabarimala? Another fun is your advice not to worry and be happy.There is no dearth for happiness in me as I always possess equanimity of mind never bothering abt accolades or derisions as I know that is all part of the game.By chanting Narayana with full faith

will all the ills of the people automatically vanish?Then why shuld one go to the temple and make offerings instead of keeping quiet at home and chanting Narayana all the time.Since you and I know that the same is not practical as the same won't make the world move as even Krishna has said do your duty without expecting rewards simply chanting won't lead anybody anywhere unless the same is also accompanied by the duty,love and devotion and compassion to the fellow beings.That is the only way to get the Mercy and Grace OF God and this what all the scriptures also enunciate.Even Vasudeva Krishna also reiterates the same thing. Krishnadaya,don't get upset over what I hv said as it is not my intention to wound your feelings.You hv said what you think to be a method and I just said what I felt.That is all.As I know you are a great Krishna bhaktha and doing good services in your

own humble way I hv just taken some liberty to bring to your attention that there are many things beyond our control as Hamlet used to say in Othello,'Horatio,there are many wonders in this world than what you imagine'. In essence what I mean by Bhakthy has nothing to do with the so called offerings and vazhipadus though the same are left to the choice of the devotees as I myself don't know whether I am a devotee or not and to what extent I hv progressed in this field as it is an ocean and only God is the arbiter in such things.God Bless.. Hare Krishna, agraman. krishnadaya <krishnadaya wrote: Sri Guruvayoorappan saranam,A devotee is an instrument of the Bhagavan Sri Krishna ; and it is the Lord's power that is acting through him/her. It is quite natural that , a devotee is grateful to the Bhagavan for His kindness ; and is always pleased to offer something in return. It is easy to criticise the Temple working systems in place , but difficult to run it . There is no need for the devotee to worry about the running of temple because Bhagavan is there to take care through His own ways and means. The religious institutions of non-Hindu religions don't have any public accountabilty whereas the Devaswam Boards are accountable to Government. Most of the small temples are run from

the income of Guruvayoor and Sabarimala. So let us be positive in our approach . Don't worry, be happy!!!!Just chant Om Namo Narayanaya and leave the rest to Bhagavan.A Bhaktanguruvayur , GANAPATHY RAMAN <agraman62 wrote:>> > > Of course for running the temple,paying salary etc money is required but the point is who are the persons chalking out the various vazhipadus and fixing rates?The temple authorities and not God.If the temple authorities say that to > run the temple money is required and hence donate your might they won't get > much but if they exhibit in boards that such and such vazhipadus can bring this and that benefit people are glad to contribute whether the same materialises or> not and so the authorities are trying to display a long list to collect funds in

this way which has nothing to do with Bhakthy or God.This trend has become in vogue during the past decades only.Centuries back there were no such things.> > Temples like Guruvayur or Sabarimala or Tripati attract devotees in millions and> in this way the coffers also can overflow by the so called vazhipadus.A devotee > is happy iif he does some thulabharam with sugar or plantain or anything by paying the rates fixed by the administration thinking that God is pleased with his offering, and the administration is happy that their bank balances increase which > can be utilised and misutilised for various things.This is actually what is happening in big temples.On the otherhand there are innumerable temples which don't hv any income even to offer neivedyam to the Deity or having enough oil even to light the lamps.Why the devotees don't flock to those temples also and> do the vazhipadus so

that those temples too can see the light of the day.Is> Guruvayurappan sits only in Guruvayur or Sastha sits only in Sabarimalai when > the all pervading God is in every atom and every idol why some temples flourish and some suffer?Does that mean that people who go to those less fortunate > temples are not devotees?In Tripati there is a custom that everyday whatever > money and other offerings come will be accounted before the Deity in the night> but it is not known how the money is being spent and whether the Deity gives permission for all the expenses?There was even an attempt years back that the > amounts collected shuld be invested in Govt bonds thereby diverting the funds of the temple but due to the protest of the devotees the idea was shelved.> > There is noting wrong in collecting money for the administration of temple by > means like vazhipadus but that can't

be connected with Bhakthy as there is no> sanction from the Deity for the same and it is only the temple administration fixes the same.Years back in GVR udayasthamana pooja was fixed at Rs.5000> but now I don't know the amount but certainly it must be 50000 and what is the > guidelines for fixing such exhorbitant rates?The temple administration members enjoy in all comforts from the so called collections and that too everybody knows.Then how this collection can be linked to ardent Bhakthy?Did the > Deity of GVR or Sabarimala told the administration to collect so much money?> So in the name of God all these are made.In a country like India with more than a billion people there is always the tendency to resort to superstitions in beliefs> and the eagerness to know abt the future thru astrology.If there is something > wrong immediately it is decided to conduct an ashtamangalya

prasna is conducted.The astrologers say that God is furious because the surroundings are polluted and the devotees are not havig proper devotion,roads are not good and all such things.When the same is said by media and people nobody bothers and when the astrologers say that God is angry immedately steps are taken to ward > off evils supposed to happen if the same are not done.Are they not looking funny?> > My intention is not to fnd fault with anything that is going on which everybody knows but the pertinent thing is that for a Bhaktha such things appear to be superfluous and when so many temples ae suffering for lack of funs why certain important temples alone take the cakes when we accept that God is everywhere.There is no explanation for this anamoly and the same will continue.> So by doing vazhipadus and offerings the temple coffers can be filled up but not lead one to Real Bhakthy.Was there

such a system during the days of Bhattathiri and Poonthanam?Because those days they had so much love and > devotion to God and never bothered abt other things..Now the trend has changed and money takes the upper hand over Real Bhakthy.What a pity?> > If anybody is offended by these comments I express regret as I hv only stated what I felt and to enforce the fact that Bhakthy has nothing to do with the so > called offerings and the same depends on individual choices and not on the > choice of people running temple administration.> > > Hare Krishna.> > > hba9331 <pravin9 wrote:> Om Namo Narayanaya> A very good topic to discuss on this forum. Everybody should > earnestly participate...since there are bound to be various > questions coming up in our mind...one such question I have> > It was discussed in one of

the Books of AMMA that Guruvayoor does > not need any of our material offerings in cash or kind, all those > goes to the funding account. But if the below concept is followed it > would be very difficult to maintain the temple and the > infrastructure needed and the salary to be paid to various employee. > We in Kerala do not have the concept of KARSEVA as with the Sikh > community where free service is also an offering. The give and take > concept if discouraged would have far reaching consequence on the > day to day working of such institution...I have my own doubts if the > Hindu system would work purely on the Bakthi concept. Currently when > some bad time falls on us, we run to Guruvayoorappan, same way as a > child runs to his/her parents when they are in trouble or even when > they have a bad dream...but since we are not kids we feel it would > not be fair

to go empty handed so promise Guruvayoorappan certain > Vazipadu....more over even the Vazipadus are classified into do this > and you get this..do that and that for good health...etc..> > I shall be very thankful if these doubts are cleared by the good > members in our forum.> > Narayana Narayana.....> > Pravin> > guruvayur , "K.V Gopalakrishna" > <gopalakrishna.kv@> wrote:> >> > Dear Mataji,> > Radhe Krishna!> > > > I agree with you one hundred per cent. With due regard to what > Shri > > Ganapathy Raman and Krishna Prasad have said, in some cases, it is > a > > fact that complacency creeps in when one acquires the object he > has been > > longing for. This complacency makes him

too jubilant, raising > his ego > > level so high, that he forgets for a time, that what he has > acquired is > > by divine grace also. I have deliberately added the word "also" > > because many people think that one's hard work was responsible for > his > > upliftment in life, or that it was the cleverness of the doctor > and the > > efficacy of the medicine that has cured him. I would like to > reiterate > > here that hard work is definitely required to be done if one wants > to > > come up in life. Similarly, the doctor's experience and the > efficacy > > of the medicine play a very important part in curing the > disease. But > > all these require divine grace to have their effect. Without > that, no > > medicine will work, and any amount of hard work will not pay. > People > > have

the habit of blaming God when something wrong happens without > > realising that the bad that has happened is result of one's own > Karma. > > Let us not forget that even to think of God, His grace is > required. > > "Iswaranugrahad eva bhakthirbhavathi Kesave!"> > > > Promising to perform a particular "vazhipadu" to God if He favours > etc., > > like performing a "Tulabharam" if one gets cured of his ailment > etc., is > > an inferior type of Bhakti. On the face of the person's promise > and > > cure of the disease, it may look as though the person got cured > because > > of the promise made. But really speaking, it is not so. It is > the > > person's belief on one side and the fruits of Karma on the other > cured > > him. The Lord will accept anything if offered with Bhakti. > But what

> > He wants is Bhakti and Bhakti alone.> > > > Regards> > KVG.> > > > > > Saroja Ramanujam wrote:> > > > > Well said Gopalakrishnan!> > > I think that perhaps it is relevant here to examine the > following > > > sloka from Gita.> > > > > > Chathurvidhaa bajanthe maamjanaah sukrthino arjuna> > > aatho jignaasurarthaartheejnaanee cha bharathrshbha> > > Krishna says,> > > 'Four types of devotees of noble deeds worship Me, Arjuna,the > seeker > > > after worldly possessions, the afflicted,the seeker for > knowledge and > > > the man of wisdom, O best of Bharathas A man who believes in God > prays > > > for the fulfilment of his cherished objects of the world,wealth > or > > > child and so on. When he

gets them as a result of his prayer his > > > devotion is strengthened and develops into faith.If he has not > already > > > acquired faith he will lose belief if his desire is not > fulfilled.This > > > is why we often hear the cry 'I no more believe in God,' from > those > > > who face disappointments in life.> > > Sugreeva and dhruva can be cited as examples of arthaarthee type > of > > > devotees, the former devoloped faith after the fulfilment of his > > > desire while Dhruva had both faith and beliefand became a jnani > later, > > > elevated to the status of dhruva star.> > > The second kind of devotee who seeks God as his sole refuge when > in > > > distress like Droupadi or Gajendra are aarthees with staunch > faith > > > that He alone is their saviour, which

is termed as > mahavisvasam ,among > > > the five requisites of saranagathi. They do not seek Him for > worldly > > > pleasures but remain ardent devotees through out their life > which > > > alone will make them call out to Him in earnest.In normal life > we do > > > not have that faith in God eventhough we have belief in Him and > > > therefore we suffer in consequenceHere comes the importance of > the > > > word 'sukrthinah' which Krishna uses to describe the four kinds > of > > > devotees. To think of God and yearn for His mercy requires > > > poorvajanmapunya. There is a story to illustrate this.> > > A man who was a confirmed sinner was sitting on a tree and Lord > Siva > > > happened to pass that way with Parvathi. Siva told Parvathi that > the > > > man is going to

fall from the tree and die since it is his fate. > > > Parvathi, being the divine mother, took pity on the man and said > that > > > they should save him to which Siva replied that it was his karma > being > > > a sinner to die such a death.When Parvathi remonstrated with him > Siva > > > said that He will save the man if he cries out 'appa' and she > should > > > save him if he says 'amma' when he falls. Parvathi was happy > without > > > realising the real purport of Siva's words.The branch on which > the man > > > was sitting broke and he fell down crying'aiyo,' because he did > not > > > have the sukrthi to call God's name at the time of death> > > Jignasu is one who has pure devotion and does not seek the > pleasures > > > of life nor is he worried about distress

because the only thing > that > > > could cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and > to > > > acertain extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of > Bhakthi. A > > > jignasu who has pure devotion and does not seek the pleasures of > life > > > nor is he worried about distress because the only thing that > could > > > cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and to > acertain > > > extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A > jignasu > > > loves the Lord for his own sake and seeks to acquire the jnana > which > > > the Lord Himself gives as in the case of Udhdhava or through > someone > > > as He did for Parikshit.> > > > > > The last but not least is the jnani who has realised the truth > about >

> > the Lord like Prahlada, Narada and other sages who were both > bhakthas > > > and jnanis.> > > > > > Besides, Ramanuja says in his sribhashya,> > > 'dhyAnam cha thailadhArAvath avicchinna smrthisanthAna roopam,' > > > continous flow of remembrance like the stream of continously > dropping > > > oil. 'DhruvA smrthih ;smrthilambhe sarvagranTheenAm > > > vipramokshah,'(Chan.7-26-2) when the constant,dhruva, > remembrance, > > > smrthih is attained all knots are rent asunder. Thus > DHruvAsmrthi is > > > prescribed as the means of liberation> > > > > > > > > Saroja Ramanujam> > >> > > > > >> > > .> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > May god bless you,> > >

> > > Dr. Saroja Ramanujam, M.A., Ph.D, Siromani in > sanskrit.> > > > > >> > > -------------------------> -------> > > > > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail Beta. > > > > <http://us.rd./evt=40791/*http://advision.webevents..co> m/handraisers> > > >> > >> >> > > > > > > > India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new Click here> Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click here>

India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new Click here

Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Sri Guruvayoorappan Saranam,

 

My humble pranams to Sri Guruvayoorapppan and all His devotees ,

 

I respect Sri Ganapathy Raman , but differ with him on those adverse

views against Sri Guruvayoorappan's relevance. Millions of devotees

have experienced the live presence of Lord Sri Krishna in Guruvayoor

temple ; and His deity is not inactive like the Kelappan statue

outside. Not even a leaf will move inside the temple against

Bhagavan's wish ; and this has been time and again revealed

through chosen sources.

 

Each devotee is dear to Bhagavan and this relationship is dependent

on his/her past karma and degree of devotion . As a humble worshipper

of Sri Krishna's lotus feet , I am depending totally on the chanting

of Narayana-nama for everything and from it's strength endeavor to

follow Bhagavan 's advice :

• Do your duty, to the best of your abilities, for Me without

any selfish motive, and remember Me at all times - before starting a

work, at the completion of a task, and while inactive.

• Practice to look upon all creatures as Myself in thought,

word, and deed ; and mentally bow down to them.

• Although I the Supreme God, can never be captured by ordinary

sense perception, My devotees may use their intelligence and

perception (by bhakti-yoga) to directly search for Me through both

apparent and indirect symptoms.

• Awaken your dormant spiritual power (by bhakti-yoga)and

perceive through the activities of mind, senses, breathing, and

emotions that My power is within you at all times, and is constantly

doing all the work using you as a mere instrument " .

 

PRESENT REALITIES

 

In this age of cut throat competition and selfishness , modern India

( ex- Bharatakhanda) as a nation has practically replaced it's

sacred atmic approach with, hypocritical secularism (Godlessness) .

 

Social work and charity have become big business these days ; and

many of the related organizations fight each other to grab own scope

in the event of a natural calamity . In certain cases , even

spirituality is being marketed cleverly ; and the same people ask

their followers not to donate to Guruvayoor temple .

 

There is no accountability for the huge funds being collected by many

anti-vedic social organizations and many of such funds are being used

to destabilize this ancient country which is still a thorn in the

flesh of anti-vedic forces .

 

Guruvayoor temple remains as a ray of hope for the struggling vedic

faith and associated social well being .

 

SCRIPTURAL JUSTIFICATION for OFFERINGS BY DEVOTEES

 

Bhagavan Krishna advises Uddhava ( Srimad Bhagavatam Chapter no.11 )

on temple worship :

 

SB 11.27.15 : One should worship Me in My Deity forms by offering the

most excellent paraphernalia . But a devotee completely freed from

material desire may worship Me with whatever he is able to obtain,

and may even worship Me within his heart with mental paraphernalia.

 

SB 11.27.16-17 : In worshiping the temple Deity, my dear Uddhava,

bathing and decoration are the most pleasing offerings . For the

Deity traced on sacred ground, the process of tattva-viny & #257;sais most

dear. Oblations of sesame and barley soaked in ghee are the preferred

offering to the sacrificial fire, whereas worship consisting of

upasth & #257;na and arghya is preferred for the sun. One should worship Me

in the form of water by offering water itself. Actually, whatever is

offered to Me with faith by My devotee — even if only a little water —

is most dear to Me.

 

SB 11.27.18 : Even very opulent presentations do not satisfy Me if

they are offered by nondevotees . But I am pleased by any

insignificant offering made by My loving devotees, and I am certainly

most pleased when nice presentations of fragrant oil, incense,

flowers and palatable foods are offered with love.

 

SB 11.27.32 : My devotee should then lovingly decorate Me with

clothing, a brahmana thread, various ornaments, marks of tilaka and

garlands, and he should anoint My body with fragrant oils, all in the

prescribed manner.

 

SB 11.27.33 : The worshiper should faithfully present Me with water

for washing My feet and mouth, fragrant oils, flowers and unbroken

grains, along with incense, lamps and other offerings.

 

SB 11.27.34 : Within his means, the devotee should arrange to offer

Me sugar candy, sweet rice, ghee, rice-flour cakes, various sweet

cakes, steamed rice-flour dumplings filled with sweet coconut and

sugar , wheat cakes made with ghee and milk and covered with sugar

and spices], yogurt, vegetable soups and other palatable foods.

 

SB 11.27.35 : On special occasions, and daily if possible, the Deity

should be massaged with ointment, shown a mirror, offered a

eucalyptus stick for brushing His teeth, bathed with the five kinds

of nectar, offered all kinds of opulent foods, and entertained with

singing and dancing.

 

SB 11.27.44 : Singing along with others, chanting loudly and dancing,

acting out My transcendental pastimes, and hearing and telling

stories about Me, the devotee should for some time absorb himself in

such festivity.

 

SB 11.27.45 : The devotee should offer homage to the Lord with all

kinds of hymns and prayers, both from the Pur & #257;n & #803;as and from other

ancient scriptures, and also from ordinary traditions. Praying, " O

Lord, please be merciful to me! " he should fall down flat like a rod

to offer his obeisances.

 

SB 11.27.46 : Placing his head at the feet of the Deity, he should

then stand with folded hands before the Lord and pray, " O my Lord,

please protect me, who am surrendered unto You. I am most fearful of

this ocean of material existence, standing as I am in the mouth of

death. "

 

SB 11.27.47 : Praying in this way, the devotee should respectfully

place upon his head the remnants I offer to him. And if the

particular Deity is meant to be sent away at the end of the worship,

then this should be performed, the devotee once again placing the

light of the Deity's presence inside the light of the lotus within

his own heart.

 

SB 11.27.48 : Whenever one develops faith in Me — in My form as the

Deity or in other bona fide manifestations — one should worship Me in

that form. I certainly exist both within all created beings and also

separately in My original form, since I am the Supreme Soul of all.

 

SB 11.27.49 : By worshiping Me through the various methods prescribed

in the Vedas and tantras, one will gain from Me his desired

perfection in both this life and the next .

 

SB 11.27.50 : The devotee should more fully establish My Deity by

solidly constructing a temple, along with beautiful gardens. These

gardens should be set aside to provide flowers for the regular daily

worship, special Deity processions and holiday observances.

 

SB 11.27.51: One who offers the Deity gifts of land, markets, cities

and villages so that the regular daily worship and special festivals

of the Deity may go on continually will achieve opulence equal to My

own.

 

SB 11.27.52 : By installing the Deity of the Lord one becomes king of

the entire earth, by building a temple for the Lord one becomes ruler

of the three worlds, by worshiping and serving the Deity one goes to

the planet of Lord Brahma and by performing all three of these

activities one achieves a transcendental form like My own.

 

SB 11.27.53: But one who simply engages in devotional service with no

consideration of fruitive results attains Me . Thus whoever worships

Me according to the process I have described will ultimately attain

pure devotional service unto Me .

 

SB 11.27.54 : Anyone who steals the property of the Devas or the

brahmanas, whether originally given to them by himself or someone

else, must live as a worm in stool for one hundred million years.

 

SB 11.27.55 : Not only the performer of the theft but also anyone who

assists him, instigates the crime, or simply approves of it must also

share the reaction in the next life. According to their degree of

participation, they each must suffer a proportionate consequence.

 

MADHAVA SEVA IN A TEMPLE BECOMES MANAVA SEVA TOO

 

Paramacharya Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswati Swamy said :

" Every morning a handful of rice(uncooked) must be set apart for the

poor. All the families must do this without fail every day . The rice

thus kept must be collected from house to house, from quarter to

quarter, cooked offered to the Deity of the local temple

as " naivedya " and then distributed among the poor. With the handful

of rice set apart for the poor, keep just one Rupee also. The Rupees

collected from each family would be sufficient to buy salt, chilli

powder, etc, to mix with the rice to make it more palatable. It would

also serve to buy firewood and to pay the rent for the vessels. To

carry out such a scheme is to do a great service to the poor - and to

the Lord. Charity like this should encourage temple going, not to

speak of devotion. Since the food is first offered as " naivedya " , it

would mean that the poor will take it as prasadam which will impart

them inner purity.

" Annadan " or the gift of food is one kind of service of paropakara.

We talk of service to the poor, social service and so on. Today all

this is done with much fanfare and publicity. In the past the needy

were served naturally, without making any noise. Service comes

under " purta- dharma " and it includes digging wells and ponds for the

public, feeding the poor, building temples for the spiritual well-

being of people, laying our gardens. As we keep serving people in

this way we will obtain inward purity . "

 

Jagadguru K.K. Shankaracharya Swami wrote :

 

" We enjoy the good things in life such as house, food, clothing,

ornaments, music, dance, etc. We pay a tribute in the form of taxes

to the king or to the government, for making it possible for us to

enjoy them by giving us their protection. Even as we render homage to

the king for the enjoyment of these things, we are bound to render

our gratitude to God who has

primarily given us the good things of life.

 

We offer a part of these good things as a token of our gratitude to

Him in the temple. We first offer to the Lord all that He has given

to us in the shape of food, clothing, jewels, music, flowers, light,

incense, etc., with the grateful consciousness that they are His

gifts to us ; and we receive them back from Him as His PRASAAD. The

temple is the place where these offerings are made on behalf of the

collective community. Even if people do not go to the temple, it is

enough if these offerings are made to God on behalf of the community.

The duty of the people at the place is to see that these offerings

are made in the proper manner. "

 

CONCLUSION

 

In addition to bringing the devotees closer to Bhagavan , Guruvayoor

temple also help thousands of people by feeding them directly or

indirectly . It is the duty of all devotees to contribute for the

smooth running of temples ; and to remove public misunderstandings

caused by unfounded allegations.

 

Om Namo Narayanaya !

 

Krishnadaya

 

--------------

guruvayur , GANAPATHY RAMAN <agraman62

wrote:

>

> Dear Krishnadaya,

>

> It is quite some time that you hv not been heard in this

Group.Here the question is not that of how the temples are

administered or how the offerings of devotees

> are utilised or what interests the devotees to make such

offerings.As said that

> depends on individual choices and there is no need to

interfere.But regarding the

> amounts collected by way of vazhipadus and how they are utilised

nobody knows and that is also not our concern.The point is how such

things can be correlated to the Bakthy concept?Do you wish to say

that by offerings even though with full heart could be construed as

Bhakthy?There are hundreds of people who just dump money in the hundi

which has become a custom and not a way of expressing Bhakthy.I hv

seen in all the big temples .big bundles of notes are deposited in

the hundi and do you think that can be termed as bhakthy?or is it

some type of bargaining?There are hundreds of people who never bother

to contribute even token amounts to many deserving cases like the

> Deaf and Dumb society,Blind society,Charitable institutions who

run providing

> succour to the orphans but they are prepared to put waddles of

currencies in the hundis and as offerings as if God is in need of

that.Why this change in their minds?Instead of dumping money in the

hundis if they spend at least a portion to the needy,distressed

people will not that bring them the Grace of God as all are His

children and due to karma effects they hv born to suffer and giving

them a helping hand,will not that please the God?It is said

Manavaseva is Madhavaseva-when that is eloquently drummed up in

platforms are all practicing

> the same?By dumping money for the sake of upliftment of temples

which are

> already very rich what purpose does it serve when the teeming

millions suffer in

> desolation and despair?Do you not think that have nots shuld be

protected by

> those who hv the money power in the interest of God as all are

His creatures?

> Due to good karmas in the earlier births one may possess lot of

wealth but shuld not the person think that the same shuld be

distributed at least a portion

> to the needy?

>

> I am not a preacher but I say from practical point of view and

not to offend anybody.I know you hv enough knowledge to understand

what I mean?You are also doing a great service and that too I know in

your own way which is surely

> laudable.As a Krishna bhaktha you shuld hv the compassion to the

down trodden also.Of course the whole world can't be made into a

paradise overnight

> by doling out to the needy people but those who do even a bit

will surely enjoy

> great peace and the Grace of God as He is not for the rich and

vainglorious people but for the poor,unsung people as He has

demonstrated in the case of

> Kuchela.If the devotee is the instrument of Bhagawan Krishna

whyshuld He make him to be a slave to the material gains without

thinking abt His own brothers and sisters who are also the

instruments of Him.So that argument carries no weight.It s because

there is an element of ego in the minds of His instruments also which

even He finds it difficult to dilute.Again you say that Bhagawan will

take care of running the temples.In what way?Is He the chairman of

the administrative board?or is He giving directions?In your estimate

how many temples come under the purview of GVR and Sabarimala temples?

Are all the temples properly taken care of by the Boards of the GVR

and Sabarimala?

>

> Another fun is your advice not to worry and be happy.There is no

dearth for happiness in me as I always possess equanimity of mind

never bothering abt accolades or derisions as I know that is all part

of the game.By chanting Narayana with full faith will all the ills of

the people automatically vanish?Then why shuld one go to the temple

and make offerings instead of keeping quiet at home and chanting

Narayana all the time.Since you and I know that the same is not

practical as the same won't make the world move as even Krishna has

said

> do your duty without expecting rewards simply chanting won't lead

anybody

> anywhere unless the same is also accompanied by the duty,love and

devotion

> and compassion to the fellow beings.That is the only way to get

the Mercy and Grace OF God and this what all the scriptures also

enunciate.Even Vasudeva

> Krishna also reiterates the same thing.

>

> Krishnadaya,don't get upset over what I hv said as it is not my

intention to wound your feelings.You hv said what you think to be a

method and I just said what I felt.That is all.As I know you are a

great Krishna bhaktha and doing good

> services in your own humble way I hv just taken some liberty to

bring to your

> attention that there are many things beyond our control as Hamlet

used to say

> in Othello,'Horatio,there are many wonders in this world than

what you imagine'.

> In essence what I mean by Bhakthy has nothing to do with the so

called offerings and vazhipadus though the same are left to the

choice of the devotees as I myself don't know whether I am a devotee

or not and to what extent I hv

> progressed in this field as it is an ocean and only God is the

arbiter in such things.God Bless..

>

> Hare Krishna,

> agraman.

>

>

> krishnadaya <krishnadaya wrote:

> Sri Guruvayoorappan saranam,

>

> A devotee is an instrument of the Bhagavan Sri Krishna ; and it is

> the Lord's power that is acting through him/her. It is quite

natural

> that , a devotee is grateful to the Bhagavan for His kindness ; and

> is always pleased to offer something in return.

>

> It is easy to criticise the Temple working systems in place , but

> difficult to run it . There is no need for the devotee to worry

about

> the running of temple because Bhagavan is there to take care

through

> His own ways and means.

>

> The religious institutions of non-Hindu religions don't have any

> public accountabilty whereas the Devaswam Boards are accountable to

> Government. Most of the small temples are run from the income of

> Guruvayoor and Sabarimala.

>

> So let us be positive in our approach . Don't worry, be happy!!!!

> Just chant Om Namo Narayanaya and leave the rest to Bhagavan.

>

> A Bhaktan

>

> guruvayur , GANAPATHY RAMAN <agraman62@>

> wrote:

> >

> >

> >

> > Of course for running the temple,paying salary etc money is

> required but the point is who are the persons chalking out the

> various vazhipadus and fixing rates?The temple authorities and not

> God.If the temple authorities say that to

> > run the temple money is required and hence donate your might they

> won't get

> > much but if they exhibit in boards that such and such vazhipadus

> can bring this and that benefit people are glad to contribute

whether

> the same materialises or

> > not and so the authorities are trying to display a long list to

> collect funds in this way which has nothing to do with Bhakthy or

> God.This trend has become in vogue during the past decades

> only.Centuries back there were no such things.

> >

> > Temples like Guruvayur or Sabarimala or Tripati attract devotees

> in millions and

> > in this way the coffers also can overflow by the so called

> vazhipadus.A devotee

> > is happy iif he does some thulabharam with sugar or plantain or

> anything by paying the rates fixed by the administration thinking

> that God is pleased with his offering, and the administration is

> happy that their bank balances increase which

> > can be utilised and misutilised for various things.This is

> actually what is happening in big temples.On the otherhand there

are

> innumerable temples which don't hv any income even to offer

neivedyam

> to the Deity or having enough oil even to light the lamps.Why the

> devotees don't flock to those temples also and

> > do the vazhipadus so that those temples too can see the light of

> the day.Is

> > Guruvayurappan sits only in Guruvayur or Sastha sits only in

> Sabarimalai when

> > the all pervading God is in every atom and every idol why some

> temples flourish and some suffer?Does that mean that people who go

to

> those less fortunate

> > temples are not devotees?In Tripati there is a custom that

> everyday whatever

> > money and other offerings come will be accounted before the Deity

> in the night

> > but it is not known how the money is being spent and whether the

> Deity gives permission for all the expenses?There was even an

attempt

> years back that the

> > amounts collected shuld be invested in Govt bonds thereby

> diverting the funds of the temple but due to the protest of the

> devotees the idea was shelved.

> >

> > There is noting wrong in collecting money for the administration

> of temple by

> > means like vazhipadus but that can't be connected with Bhakthy as

> there is no

> > sanction from the Deity for the same and it is only the temple

> administration fixes the same.Years back in GVR udayasthamana pooja

> was fixed at Rs.5000

> > but now I don't know the amount but certainly it must be 50000

> and what is the

> > guidelines for fixing such exhorbitant rates?The temple

> administration members enjoy in all comforts from the so called

> collections and that too everybody knows.Then how this collection

can

> be linked to ardent Bhakthy?Did the

> > Deity of GVR or Sabarimala told the administration to collect so

> much money?

> > So in the name of God all these are made.In a country like India

> with more than a billion people there is always the tendency to

> resort to superstitions in beliefs

> > and the eagerness to know abt the future thru astrology.If there

> is something

> > wrong immediately it is decided to conduct an ashtamangalya

> prasna is conducted.The astrologers say that God is furious because

> the surroundings are polluted and the devotees are not havig proper

> devotion,roads are not good and all such things.When the same is

said

> by media and people nobody bothers and when the astrologers say

that

> God is angry immedately steps are taken to ward

> > off evils supposed to happen if the same are not done.Are they

> not looking funny?

> >

> > My intention is not to fnd fault with anything that is going on

> which everybody knows but the pertinent thing is that for a Bhaktha

> such things appear to be superfluous and when so many temples ae

> suffering for lack of funs why certain important temples alone take

> the cakes when we accept that God is everywhere.There is no

> explanation for this anamoly and the same will continue.

> > So by doing vazhipadus and offerings the temple coffers can be

> filled up but not lead one to Real Bhakthy.Was there such a system

> during the days of Bhattathiri and Poonthanam?Because those days

they

> had so much love and

> > devotion to God and never bothered abt other things..Now the

> trend has changed and money takes the upper hand over Real

> Bhakthy.What a pity?

> >

> > If anybody is offended by these comments I express regret as I hv

> only stated what I felt and to enforce the fact that Bhakthy has

> nothing to do with the so

> > called offerings and the same depends on individual choices and

> not on the

> > choice of people running temple administration.

> >

> >

> > Hare Krishna.

> >

> >

> > hba9331 <pravin9@> wrote:

> > Om Namo Narayanaya

> > A very good topic to discuss on this forum. Everybody should

> > earnestly participate...since there are bound to be various

> > questions coming up in our mind...one such question I have

> >

> > It was discussed in one of the Books of AMMA that Guruvayoor does

> > not need any of our material offerings in cash or kind, all those

> > goes to the funding account. But if the below concept is followed

> it

> > would be very difficult to maintain the temple and the

> > infrastructure needed and the salary to be paid to various

> employee.

> > We in Kerala do not have the concept of KARSEVA as with the Sikh

> > community where free service is also an offering. The give and

take

> > concept if discouraged would have far reaching consequence on the

> > day to day working of such institution...I have my own doubts if

> the

> > Hindu system would work purely on the Bakthi concept. Currently

> when

> > some bad time falls on us, we run to Guruvayoorappan, same way as

a

> > child runs to his/her parents when they are in trouble or even

when

> > they have a bad dream...but since we are not kids we feel it

would

> > not be fair to go empty handed so promise Guruvayoorappan certain

> > Vazipadu....more over even the Vazipadus are classified into do

> this

> > and you get this..do that and that for good health...etc..

> >

> > I shall be very thankful if these doubts are cleared by the good

> > members in our forum.

> >

> > Narayana Narayana.....

> >

> > Pravin

> >

> > guruvayur , " K.V Gopalakrishna "

> > <gopalakrishna.kv@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Mataji,

> > > Radhe Krishna!

> > >

> > > I agree with you one hundred per cent. With due regard to what

> > Shri

> > > Ganapathy Raman and Krishna Prasad have said, in some cases, it

> is

> > a

> > > fact that complacency creeps in when one acquires the object he

> > has been

> > > longing for. This complacency makes him too jubilant, raising

> > his ego

> > > level so high, that he forgets for a time, that what he has

> > acquired is

> > > by divine grace also. I have deliberately added the word " also "

> > > because many people think that one's hard work was responsible

> for

> > his

> > > upliftment in life, or that it was the cleverness of the doctor

> > and the

> > > efficacy of the medicine that has cured him. I would like to

> > reiterate

> > > here that hard work is definitely required to be done if one

> wants

> > to

> > > come up in life. Similarly, the doctor's experience and the

> > efficacy

> > > of the medicine play a very important part in curing the

> > disease. But

> > > all these require divine grace to have their effect. Without

> > that, no

> > > medicine will work, and any amount of hard work will not pay.

> > People

> > > have the habit of blaming God when something wrong happens

> without

> > > realising that the bad that has happened is result of one's own

> > Karma.

> > > Let us not forget that even to think of God, His grace is

> > required.

> > > " Iswaranugrahad eva bhakthirbhavathi Kesave! "

> > >

> > > Promising to perform a particular " vazhipadu " to God if He

> favours

> > etc.,

> > > like performing a " Tulabharam " if one gets cured of his ailment

> > etc., is

> > > an inferior type of Bhakti. On the face of the person's promise

> > and

> > > cure of the disease, it may look as though the person got cured

> > because

> > > of the promise made. But really speaking, it is not so. It is

> > the

> > > person's belief on one side and the fruits of Karma on the

other

> > cured

> > > him. The Lord will accept anything if offered with Bhakti.

> > But what

> > > He wants is Bhakti and Bhakti alone.

> > >

> > > Regards

> > > KVG.

> > >

> > >

> > > Saroja Ramanujam wrote:

> > >

> > > > Well said Gopalakrishnan!

> > > > I think that perhaps it is relevant here to examine the

> > following

> > > > sloka from Gita.

> > > >

> > > > Chathurvidhaa bajanthe maamjanaah sukrthino arjuna

> > > > aatho jignaasurarthaartheejnaanee cha bharathrshbha

> > > > Krishna says,

> > > > 'Four types of devotees of noble deeds worship Me, Arjuna,the

> > seeker

> > > > after worldly possessions, the afflicted,the seeker for

> > knowledge and

> > > > the man of wisdom, O best of Bharathas A man who believes in

> God

> > prays

> > > > for the fulfilment of his cherished objects of the

world,wealth

> > or

> > > > child and so on. When he gets them as a result of his prayer

> his

> > > > devotion is strengthened and develops into faith.If he has

not

> > already

> > > > acquired faith he will lose belief if his desire is not

> > fulfilled.This

> > > > is why we often hear the cry 'I no more believe in God,' from

> > those

> > > > who face disappointments in life.

> > > > Sugreeva and dhruva can be cited as examples of arthaarthee

> type

> > of

> > > > devotees, the former devoloped faith after the fulfilment of

> his

> > > > desire while Dhruva had both faith and beliefand became a

jnani

> > later,

> > > > elevated to the status of dhruva star.

> > > > The second kind of devotee who seeks God as his sole refuge

> when

> > in

> > > > distress like Droupadi or Gajendra are aarthees with staunch

> > faith

> > > > that He alone is their saviour, which is termed as

> > mahavisvasam ,among

> > > > the five requisites of saranagathi. They do not seek Him for

> > worldly

> > > > pleasures but remain ardent devotees through out their life

> > which

> > > > alone will make them call out to Him in earnest.In normal

life

> > we do

> > > > not have that faith in God eventhough we have belief in Him

and

> > > > therefore we suffer in consequenceHere comes the importance

of

> > the

> > > > word 'sukrthinah' which Krishna uses to describe the four

kinds

> > of

> > > > devotees. To think of God and yearn for His mercy requires

> > > > poorvajanmapunya. There is a story to illustrate this.

> > > > A man who was a confirmed sinner was sitting on a tree and

Lord

> > Siva

> > > > happened to pass that way with Parvathi. Siva told Parvathi

> that

> > the

> > > > man is going to fall from the tree and die since it is his

> fate.

> > > > Parvathi, being the divine mother, took pity on the man and

> said

> > that

> > > > they should save him to which Siva replied that it was his

> karma

> > being

> > > > a sinner to die such a death.When Parvathi remonstrated with

> him

> > Siva

> > > > said that He will save the man if he cries out 'appa' and she

> > should

> > > > save him if he says 'amma' when he falls. Parvathi was happy

> > without

> > > > realising the real purport of Siva's words.The branch on

which

> > the man

> > > > was sitting broke and he fell down crying'aiyo,' because he

did

> > not

> > > > have the sukrthi to call God's name at the time of death

> > > > Jignasu is one who has pure devotion and does not seek the

> > pleasures

> > > > of life nor is he worried about distress because the only

thing

> > that

> > > > could cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava

> and

> > to

> > > > acertain extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of

> > Bhakthi. A

> > > > jignasu who has pure devotion and does not seek the pleasures

> of

> > life

> > > > nor is he worried about distress because the only thing that

> > could

> > > > cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and to

> > acertain

> > > > extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A

> > jignasu

> > > > loves the Lord for his own sake and seeks to acquire the

jnana

> > which

> > > > the Lord Himself gives as in the case of Udhdhava or through

> > someone

> > > > as He did for Parikshit.

> > > >

> > > > The last but not least is the jnani who has realised the

truth

> > about

> > > > the Lord like Prahlada, Narada and other sages who were both

> > bhakthas

> > > > and jnanis.

> > > >

> > > > Besides, Ramanuja says in his sribhashya,

> > > > 'dhyAnam cha thailadhArAvath avicchinna smrthisanthAna

roopam,'

> > > > continous flow of remembrance like the stream of continously

> > dropping

> > > > oil. 'DhruvA smrthih ;smrthilambhe sarvagranTheenAm

> > > > vipramokshah,'(Chan.7-26-2) when the constant,dhruva,

> > remembrance,

> > > > smrthih is attained all knots are rent asunder. Thus

> > DHruvAsmrthi is

> > > > prescribed as the means of liberation

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Saroja Ramanujam

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > .

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > May god bless you,

> > > >

> > > > Dr. Saroja Ramanujam, M.A., Ph.D, Siromani in

> > sanskrit.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > -------------------------

> > -------

> > > >

> > > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail Beta.

> > > >

> >

>

<http://us.rd./evt=40791/*http://advision.webevents..co

> > m/handraisers>

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new

> Click here

> > Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click

here

> >

 

> India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new

Click here

> Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click here

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Well done Krishnadaya with your quotes from Bhagavatham.I wonder where I hv pinpointed the irrelevance of Sri Guruvayurappan.Perhaps you hv not studied my reply properly and not in a position to assimilate what I hv said.You might hv carried by the thought that I am against Sri Guruvayurappan.In that respect you are way away from the tangent and your Krishna Consciousness aspect might hv made you to think like that.Your quotes from Bhagavatham are laudable.I know what the late Paramacharya of Kanchi said abt the rice separation by each family but that was in a different context and I don't know that practice is still in existenceor not due to efflex of time and the indifference of the bhakthas.I am sure you may not be aware of this fact.The first para of your reply is sometype of vitriolic comment which is not justifiable.You hv quoted some thing which I hv never said- I mean the irrelevance of Sri Guruvayurappan.Of course there are many origanisations who

collect funds and spend in whatever way they like.But just because they do it is it necessary all people shuld follow suit?Strange logic.Where did you find any adverse views of Sri Guruvayurappan? If you go thru my reply carefully you will find that I hv never said anything abt Sri Guruvayurappan but only said the plight of poor temples,downtrodden people,the reluctance of the rich to help the poor.At the same time that those are things which will bring the Grace and Mercy of the God,if some interest is shown to those aspects also.Under such circumstances though you hv taken pains to quote from Bhagavatham,a great effort,seem to be of only academic value when other pressing needs are not addressed.I know Annadhanam is performed in GVR,Tripati,Udipi etc.In Dharmasthala it is a great thing thruout the year.The same way many big temples hv such schemes and this is not confined to GVR only..Further I hv never weaned away

the devotees from making anything in the form of vazhipadus and offerings when I hv said that all those things depend on individual choices.Hence your comments carries no weight though you may differ with my views the charge that I hv said something against Sri Guruvayurappan is really preposterous.I wonder how a Krishna bhaktha like you chose to write without studying what other person has said and write something from imagination..Even in the very first para I hv said the offerings,using funds etc are not our concern.Then where the shoe pinches?I hv covered generally of all the big temples and never confined myself to Guruvayur only.I stressed only the Bhakthy concept which has nothing to do with the offerings only.Anyways I don't want to prolong this issue and your devotion to Krishna thru Krishna Consciousness organisation must hv made you to say some thing.As a good friend I wish you well and you need not be depressed by such

comments and carry on your duty according to the best of your conscience. God Bless. Hare Krishna, agraman. krishnadaya <krishnadaya wrote: Sri Guruvayoorappan Saranam,My humble pranams to Sri Guruvayoorapppan and all His devotees ,I respect Sri Ganapathy Raman

, but differ with him on those adverse views against Sri Guruvayoorappan's relevance. Millions of devotees have experienced the live presence of Lord Sri Krishna in Guruvayoor temple ; and His deity is not inactive like the Kelappan statue outside. Not even a leaf will move inside the temple against Bhagavan's wish ; and this has been time and again revealed through chosen sources. Each devotee is dear to Bhagavan and this relationship is dependent on his/her past karma and degree of devotion . As a humble worshipper of Sri Krishna's lotus feet , I am depending totally on the chanting of Narayana-nama for everything and from it's strength endeavor to follow Bhagavan 's advice :• Do your duty, to the best of your abilities, for Me without any selfish motive, and remember Me at all times - before starting a work, at the completion of a task, and while inactive. • Practice to look upon all creatures as

Myself in thought, word, and deed ; and mentally bow down to them. • Although I the Supreme God, can never be captured by ordinary sense perception, My devotees may use their intelligence and perception (by bhakti-yoga) to directly search for Me through both apparent and indirect symptoms. • Awaken your dormant spiritual power (by bhakti-yoga)and perceive through the activities of mind, senses, breathing, and emotions that My power is within you at all times, and is constantly doing all the work using you as a mere instrument".PRESENT REALITIESIn this age of cut throat competition and selfishness , modern India ( ex- Bharatakhanda) as a nation has practically replaced it's sacred atmic approach with, hypocritical secularism (Godlessness) . Social work and charity have become big business these days ; and many of the related organizations fight each other to grab own scope in the event of a

natural calamity . In certain cases , even spirituality is being marketed cleverly ; and the same people ask their followers not to donate to Guruvayoor temple . There is no accountability for the huge funds being collected by many anti-vedic social organizations and many of such funds are being used to destabilize this ancient country which is still a thorn in the flesh of anti-vedic forces . Guruvayoor temple remains as a ray of hope for the struggling vedic faith and associated social well being . SCRIPTURAL JUSTIFICATION for OFFERINGS BY DEVOTEESBhagavan Krishna advises Uddhava ( Srimad Bhagavatam Chapter no.11 ) on temple worship :SB 11.27.15 : One should worship Me in My Deity forms by offering the most excellent paraphernalia . But a devotee completely freed from material desire may worship Me with whatever he is able to obtain, and may even worship Me within his heart with mental

paraphernalia.SB 11.27.16-17 : In worshiping the temple Deity, my dear Uddhava, bathing and decoration are the most pleasing offerings . For the Deity traced on sacred ground, the process of tattva-viny & #257;sais most dear. Oblations of sesame and barley soaked in ghee are the preferred offering to the sacrificial fire, whereas worship consisting of upasth & #257;na and arghya is preferred for the sun. One should worship Me in the form of water by offering water itself. Actually, whatever is offered to Me with faith by My devotee — even if only a little water —is most dear to Me.SB 11.27.18 : Even very opulent presentations do not satisfy Me if they are offered by nondevotees . But I am pleased by any insignificant offering made by My loving devotees, and I am certainly most pleased when nice presentations of fragrant oil, incense, flowers and palatable foods are offered with love.SB

11.27.32 : My devotee should then lovingly decorate Me with clothing, a brahmana thread, various ornaments, marks of tilaka and garlands, and he should anoint My body with fragrant oils, all in the prescribed manner.SB 11.27.33 : The worshiper should faithfully present Me with water for washing My feet and mouth, fragrant oils, flowers and unbroken grains, along with incense, lamps and other offerings.SB 11.27.34 : Within his means, the devotee should arrange to offer Me sugar candy, sweet rice, ghee, rice-flour cakes, various sweet cakes, steamed rice-flour dumplings filled with sweet coconut and sugar , wheat cakes made with ghee and milk and covered with sugar and spices], yogurt, vegetable soups and other palatable foods.SB 11.27.35 : On special occasions, and daily if possible, the Deity should be massaged with ointment, shown a mirror, offered a eucalyptus stick for brushing His teeth, bathed with

the five kinds of nectar, offered all kinds of opulent foods, and entertained with singing and dancing.SB 11.27.44 : Singing along with others, chanting loudly and dancing, acting out My transcendental pastimes, and hearing and telling stories about Me, the devotee should for some time absorb himself in such festivity.SB 11.27.45 : The devotee should offer homage to the Lord with all kinds of hymns and prayers, both from the Pur & #257;n & #803;as and from other ancient scriptures, and also from ordinary traditions. Praying, "O Lord, please be merciful to me! "he should fall down flat like a rod to offer his obeisances.SB 11.27.46 : Placing his head at the feet of the Deity, he should then stand with folded hands before the Lord and pray, "O my Lord, please protect me, who am surrendered unto You. I am most fearful of this ocean of material existence, standing as I am in the mouth of

death."SB 11.27.47 : Praying in this way, the devotee should respectfully place upon his head the remnants I offer to him. And if the particular Deity is meant to be sent away at the end of the worship, then this should be performed, the devotee once again placing the light of the Deity's presence inside the light of the lotus within his own heart.SB 11.27.48 : Whenever one develops faith in Me — in My form as the Deity or in other bona fide manifestations — one should worship Me in that form. I certainly exist both within all created beings and also separately in My original form, since I am the Supreme Soul of all.SB 11.27.49 : By worshiping Me through the various methods prescribed in the Vedas and tantras, one will gain from Me his desired perfection in both this life and the next .SB 11.27.50 : The devotee should more fully establish My Deity by solidly constructing a temple, along with

beautiful gardens. These gardens should be set aside to provide flowers for the regular daily worship, special Deity processions and holiday observances.SB 11.27.51: One who offers the Deity gifts of land, markets, cities and villages so that the regular daily worship and special festivals of the Deity may go on continually will achieve opulence equal to My own.SB 11.27.52 : By installing the Deity of the Lord one becomes king of the entire earth, by building a temple for the Lord one becomes ruler of the three worlds, by worshiping and serving the Deity one goes to the planet of Lord Brahma and by performing all three of these activities one achieves a transcendental form like My own.SB 11.27.53: But one who simply engages in devotional service with no consideration of fruitive results attains Me . Thus whoever worships Me according to the process I have described will ultimately attain pure

devotional service unto Me .SB 11.27.54 : Anyone who steals the property of the Devas or the brahmanas, whether originally given to them by himself or someone else, must live as a worm in stool for one hundred million years.SB 11.27.55 : Not only the performer of the theft but also anyone who assists him, instigates the crime, or simply approves of it must also share the reaction in the next life. According to their degree of participation, they each must suffer a proportionate consequence.MADHAVA SEVA IN A TEMPLE BECOMES MANAVA SEVA TOOParamacharya Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswati Swamy said : " Every morning a handful of rice(uncooked) must be set apart for the poor. All the families must do this without fail every day . The rice thus kept must be collected from house to house, from quarter to quarter, cooked offered to the Deity of the local temple as "naivedya" and then distributed among the poor.

With the handful of rice set apart for the poor, keep just one Rupee also. The Rupees collected from each family would be sufficient to buy salt, chilli powder, etc, to mix with the rice to make it more palatable. It would also serve to buy firewood and to pay the rent for the vessels. To carry out such a scheme is to do a great service to the poor - and to the Lord. Charity like this should encourage temple going, not to speak of devotion. Since the food is first offered as "naivedya", it would mean that the poor will take it as prasadam which will impart them inner purity. "Annadan" or the gift of food is one kind of service of paropakara. We talk of service to the poor, social service and so on. Today all this is done with much fanfare and publicity. In the past the needy were served naturally, without making any noise. Service comes under "purta- dharma" and it includes digging wells and ponds for the public,

feeding the poor, building temples for the spiritual well-being of people, laying our gardens. As we keep serving people in this way we will obtain inward purity . "Jagadguru K.K. Shankaracharya Swami wrote :" We enjoy the good things in life such as house, food, clothing, ornaments, music, dance, etc. We pay a tribute in the form of taxes to the king or to the government, for making it possible for us to enjoy them by giving us their protection. Even as we render homage to the king for the enjoyment of these things, we are bound to render our gratitude to God who has primarily given us the good things of life.We offer a part of these good things as a token of our gratitude to Him in the temple. We first offer to the Lord all that He has given to us in the shape of food, clothing, jewels, music, flowers, light, incense, etc., with the grateful consciousness that they are His gifts to us ; and we

receive them back from Him as His PRASAAD. The temple is the place where these offerings are made on behalf of the collective community. Even if people do not go to the temple, it is enough if these offerings are made to God on behalf of the community. The duty of the people at the place is to see that these offerings are made in the proper manner."CONCLUSIONIn addition to bringing the devotees closer to Bhagavan , Guruvayoor temple also help thousands of people by feeding them directly or indirectly . It is the duty of all devotees to contribute for the smooth running of temples ; and to remove public misunderstandings caused by unfounded allegations.Om Namo Narayanaya !Krishnadaya--------------guruvayur , GANAPATHY RAMAN <agraman62

wrote:>> Dear Krishnadaya,> > It is quite some time that you hv not been heard in this Group.Here the question is not that of how the temples are administered or how the offerings of devotees> are utilised or what interests the devotees to make such offerings.As said that > depends on individual choices and there is no need to interfere.But regarding the > amounts collected by way of vazhipadus and how they are utilised nobody knows and that is also not our concern.The point is how such things can be correlated to the Bakthy concept?Do you wish to say that by offerings even though with full heart could be construed as Bhakthy?There are hundreds of people who just dump money in the hundi which has become a custom and not a way of expressing Bhakthy.I hv seen in all the big temples .big bundles of notes are deposited in the hundi and do you think that can be termed as bhakthy?or

is it some type of bargaining?There are hundreds of people who never bother to contribute even token amounts to many deserving cases like the > Deaf and Dumb society,Blind society,Charitable institutions who run providing> succour to the orphans but they are prepared to put waddles of currencies in the hundis and as offerings as if God is in need of that.Why this change in their minds?Instead of dumping money in the hundis if they spend at least a portion to the needy,distressed people will not that bring them the Grace of God as all are His children and due to karma effects they hv born to suffer and giving them a helping hand,will not that please the God?It is said Manavaseva is Madhavaseva-when that is eloquently drummed up in platforms are all practicing > the same?By dumping money for the sake of upliftment of temples which are > already very rich what purpose does it serve when the

teeming millions suffer in > desolation and despair?Do you not think that have nots shuld be protected by> those who hv the money power in the interest of God as all are His creatures?> Due to good karmas in the earlier births one may possess lot of wealth but shuld not the person think that the same shuld be distributed at least a portion > to the needy?> > I am not a preacher but I say from practical point of view and not to offend anybody.I know you hv enough knowledge to understand what I mean?You are also doing a great service and that too I know in your own way which is surely> laudable.As a Krishna bhaktha you shuld hv the compassion to the down trodden also.Of course the whole world can't be made into a paradise overnight> by doling out to the needy people but those who do even a bit will surely enjoy> great peace and the Grace of God as He is not for the rich

and vainglorious people but for the poor,unsung people as He has demonstrated in the case of> Kuchela.If the devotee is the instrument of Bhagawan Krishna whyshuld He make him to be a slave to the material gains without thinking abt His own brothers and sisters who are also the instruments of Him.So that argument carries no weight.It s because there is an element of ego in the minds of His instruments also which even He finds it difficult to dilute.Again you say that Bhagawan will take care of running the temples.In what way?Is He the chairman of the administrative board?or is He giving directions?In your estimate how many temples come under the purview of GVR and Sabarimala temples?Are all the temples properly taken care of by the Boards of the GVR and Sabarimala?> > Another fun is your advice not to worry and be happy.There is no dearth for happiness in me as I always possess equanimity of mind

never bothering abt accolades or derisions as I know that is all part of the game.By chanting Narayana with full faith will all the ills of the people automatically vanish?Then why shuld one go to the temple and make offerings instead of keeping quiet at home and chanting Narayana all the time.Since you and I know that the same is not practical as the same won't make the world move as even Krishna has said > do your duty without expecting rewards simply chanting won't lead anybody > anywhere unless the same is also accompanied by the duty,love and devotion> and compassion to the fellow beings.That is the only way to get the Mercy and Grace OF God and this what all the scriptures also enunciate.Even Vasudeva> Krishna also reiterates the same thing.> > Krishnadaya,don't get upset over what I hv said as it is not my intention to wound your feelings.You hv said what you think to be a

method and I just said what I felt.That is all.As I know you are a great Krishna bhaktha and doing good > services in your own humble way I hv just taken some liberty to bring to your > attention that there are many things beyond our control as Hamlet used to say > in Othello,'Horatio,there are many wonders in this world than what you imagine'.> In essence what I mean by Bhakthy has nothing to do with the so called offerings and vazhipadus though the same are left to the choice of the devotees as I myself don't know whether I am a devotee or not and to what extent I hv > progressed in this field as it is an ocean and only God is the arbiter in such things.God Bless..> > Hare Krishna,> agraman.> > > krishnadaya <krishnadaya wrote:> Sri Guruvayoorappan saranam,> > A devotee is an instrument of the Bhagavan Sri Krishna ;

and it is > the Lord's power that is acting through him/her. It is quite natural > that , a devotee is grateful to the Bhagavan for His kindness ; and > is always pleased to offer something in return. > > It is easy to criticise the Temple working systems in place , but > difficult to run it . There is no need for the devotee to worry about > the running of temple because Bhagavan is there to take care through > His own ways and means. > > The religious institutions of non-Hindu religions don't have any > public accountabilty whereas the Devaswam Boards are accountable to > Government. Most of the small temples are run from the income of > Guruvayoor and Sabarimala. > > So let us be positive in our approach . Don't worry, be happy!!!!> Just chant Om Namo Narayanaya and leave the rest to Bhagavan.> > A Bhaktan> > guruvayur , GANAPATHY RAMAN <agraman62@> > wrote:> >> > > > > > Of course for running the temple,paying salary etc money is > required but the point is who are the persons chalking out the > various vazhipadus and fixing rates?The temple authorities and not > God.If the temple authorities say that to > > run the temple money is required and hence donate your might they > won't get > > much but if they exhibit in boards that such and such vazhipadus > can bring this and that benefit people are glad to contribute whether > the same materialises or> > not and so the authorities are trying to display a long list to > collect funds in this way which has nothing to do with Bhakthy or > God.This trend has become in vogue during the past decades > only.Centuries back

there were no such things.> > > > Temples like Guruvayur or Sabarimala or Tripati attract devotees > in millions and> > in this way the coffers also can overflow by the so called > vazhipadus.A devotee > > is happy iif he does some thulabharam with sugar or plantain or > anything by paying the rates fixed by the administration thinking > that God is pleased with his offering, and the administration is > happy that their bank balances increase which > > can be utilised and misutilised for various things.This is > actually what is happening in big temples.On the otherhand there are > innumerable temples which don't hv any income even to offer neivedyam > to the Deity or having enough oil even to light the lamps.Why the > devotees don't flock to those temples also and> > do the vazhipadus so that those temples too can see the light of > the

day.Is> > Guruvayurappan sits only in Guruvayur or Sastha sits only in > Sabarimalai when > > the all pervading God is in every atom and every idol why some > temples flourish and some suffer?Does that mean that people who go to > those less fortunate > > temples are not devotees?In Tripati there is a custom that > everyday whatever > > money and other offerings come will be accounted before the Deity > in the night> > but it is not known how the money is being spent and whether the > Deity gives permission for all the expenses?There was even an attempt > years back that the > > amounts collected shuld be invested in Govt bonds thereby > diverting the funds of the temple but due to the protest of the > devotees the idea was shelved.> > > > There is noting wrong in collecting money for the administration > of temple by

> > means like vazhipadus but that can't be connected with Bhakthy as > there is no> > sanction from the Deity for the same and it is only the temple > administration fixes the same.Years back in GVR udayasthamana pooja > was fixed at Rs.5000> > but now I don't know the amount but certainly it must be 50000 > and what is the > > guidelines for fixing such exhorbitant rates?The temple > administration members enjoy in all comforts from the so called > collections and that too everybody knows.Then how this collection can > be linked to ardent Bhakthy?Did the > > Deity of GVR or Sabarimala told the administration to collect so > much money?> > So in the name of God all these are made.In a country like India > with more than a billion people there is always the tendency to > resort to superstitions in beliefs> > and the eagerness to

know abt the future thru astrology.If there > is something > > wrong immediately it is decided to conduct an ashtamangalya > prasna is conducted.The astrologers say that God is furious because > the surroundings are polluted and the devotees are not havig proper > devotion,roads are not good and all such things.When the same is said > by media and people nobody bothers and when the astrologers say that > God is angry immedately steps are taken to ward > > off evils supposed to happen if the same are not done.Are they > not looking funny?> > > > My intention is not to fnd fault with anything that is going on > which everybody knows but the pertinent thing is that for a Bhaktha > such things appear to be superfluous and when so many temples ae > suffering for lack of funs why certain important temples alone take > the cakes when we accept that God is

everywhere.There is no > explanation for this anamoly and the same will continue.> > So by doing vazhipadus and offerings the temple coffers can be > filled up but not lead one to Real Bhakthy.Was there such a system > during the days of Bhattathiri and Poonthanam?Because those days they > had so much love and > > devotion to God and never bothered abt other things..Now the > trend has changed and money takes the upper hand over Real > Bhakthy.What a pity?> > > > If anybody is offended by these comments I express regret as I hv > only stated what I felt and to enforce the fact that Bhakthy has > nothing to do with the so > > called offerings and the same depends on individual choices and > not on the > > choice of people running temple administration.> > > > > > Hare Krishna.> > > > > >

hba9331 <pravin9@> wrote:> > Om Namo Narayanaya> > A very good topic to discuss on this forum. Everybody should > > earnestly participate...since there are bound to be various > > questions coming up in our mind...one such question I have> > > > It was discussed in one of the Books of AMMA that Guruvayoor does > > not need any of our material offerings in cash or kind, all those > > goes to the funding account. But if the below concept is followed > it > > would be very difficult to maintain the temple and the > > infrastructure needed and the salary to be paid to various > employee. > > We in Kerala do not have the concept of KARSEVA as with the Sikh > > community where free service is also an offering. The give and take > > concept if discouraged would have far reaching consequence on the > > day to day

working of such institution...I have my own doubts if > the > > Hindu system would work purely on the Bakthi concept. Currently > when > > some bad time falls on us, we run to Guruvayoorappan, same way as a > > child runs to his/her parents when they are in trouble or even when > > they have a bad dream...but since we are not kids we feel it would > > not be fair to go empty handed so promise Guruvayoorappan certain > > Vazipadu....more over even the Vazipadus are classified into do > this > > and you get this..do that and that for good health...etc..> > > > I shall be very thankful if these doubts are cleared by the good > > members in our forum.> > > > Narayana Narayana.....> > > > Pravin> > > > guruvayur , "K.V Gopalakrishna" > > <gopalakrishna.kv@> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Mataji,> > > Radhe Krishna!> > > > > > I agree with you one hundred per cent. With due regard to what > > Shri > > > Ganapathy Raman and Krishna Prasad have said, in some cases, it > is > > a > > > fact that complacency creeps in when one acquires the object he > > has been > > > longing for. This complacency makes him too jubilant, raising > > his ego > > > level so high, that he forgets for a time, that what he has > > acquired is > > > by divine grace also. I have deliberately added the word "also" > > > because many people think that one's hard work was responsible > for > > his > >

> upliftment in life, or that it was the cleverness of the doctor > > and the > > > efficacy of the medicine that has cured him. I would like to > > reiterate > > > here that hard work is definitely required to be done if one > wants > > to > > > come up in life. Similarly, the doctor's experience and the > > efficacy > > > of the medicine play a very important part in curing the > > disease. But > > > all these require divine grace to have their effect. Without > > that, no > > > medicine will work, and any amount of hard work will not pay. > > People > > > have the habit of blaming God when something wrong happens > without > > > realising that the bad that has happened is result of one's own > > Karma. > > > Let us not forget that even to think of God, His

grace is > > required. > > > "Iswaranugrahad eva bhakthirbhavathi Kesave!"> > > > > > Promising to perform a particular "vazhipadu" to God if He > favours > > etc., > > > like performing a "Tulabharam" if one gets cured of his ailment > > etc., is > > > an inferior type of Bhakti. On the face of the person's promise > > and > > > cure of the disease, it may look as though the person got cured > > because > > > of the promise made. But really speaking, it is not so. It is > > the > > > person's belief on one side and the fruits of Karma on the other > > cured > > > him. The Lord will accept anything if offered with Bhakti. > > But what > > > He wants is Bhakti and Bhakti alone.> > > > > > Regards> > > KVG.> >

> > > > > > > Saroja Ramanujam wrote:> > > > > > > Well said Gopalakrishnan!> > > > I think that perhaps it is relevant here to examine the > > following > > > > sloka from Gita.> > > > > > > > Chathurvidhaa bajanthe maamjanaah sukrthino arjuna> > > > aatho jignaasurarthaartheejnaanee cha bharathrshbha> > > > Krishna says,> > > > 'Four types of devotees of noble deeds worship Me, Arjuna,the > > seeker > > > > after worldly possessions, the afflicted,the seeker for > > knowledge and > > > > the man of wisdom, O best of Bharathas A man who believes in > God > > prays > > > > for the fulfilment of his cherished objects of the world,wealth > > or > > > > child and so on. When he

gets them as a result of his prayer > his > > > > devotion is strengthened and develops into faith.If he has not > > already > > > > acquired faith he will lose belief if his desire is not > > fulfilled.This > > > > is why we often hear the cry 'I no more believe in God,' from > > those > > > > who face disappointments in life.> > > > Sugreeva and dhruva can be cited as examples of arthaarthee > type > > of > > > > devotees, the former devoloped faith after the fulfilment of > his > > > > desire while Dhruva had both faith and beliefand became a jnani > > later, > > > > elevated to the status of dhruva star.> > > > The second kind of devotee who seeks God as his sole refuge > when > > in > > > > distress like Droupadi or

Gajendra are aarthees with staunch > > faith > > > > that He alone is their saviour, which is termed as > > mahavisvasam ,among > > > > the five requisites of saranagathi. They do not seek Him for > > worldly > > > > pleasures but remain ardent devotees through out their life > > which > > > > alone will make them call out to Him in earnest.In normal life > > we do > > > > not have that faith in God eventhough we have belief in Him and > > > > therefore we suffer in consequenceHere comes the importance of > > the > > > > word 'sukrthinah' which Krishna uses to describe the four kinds > > of > > > > devotees. To think of God and yearn for His mercy requires > > > > poorvajanmapunya. There is a story to illustrate this.> > > > A man

who was a confirmed sinner was sitting on a tree and Lord > > Siva > > > > happened to pass that way with Parvathi. Siva told Parvathi > that > > the > > > > man is going to fall from the tree and die since it is his > fate. > > > > Parvathi, being the divine mother, took pity on the man and > said > > that > > > > they should save him to which Siva replied that it was his > karma > > being > > > > a sinner to die such a death.When Parvathi remonstrated with > him > > Siva > > > > said that He will save the man if he cries out 'appa' and she > > should > > > > save him if he says 'amma' when he falls. Parvathi was happy > > without > > > > realising the real purport of Siva's words.The branch on which > > the man > >

> > was sitting broke and he fell down crying'aiyo,' because he did > > not > > > > have the sukrthi to call God's name at the time of death> > > > Jignasu is one who has pure devotion and does not seek the > > pleasures > > > > of life nor is he worried about distress because the only thing > > that > > > > could cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava > and > > to > > > > acertain extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of > > Bhakthi. A > > > > jignasu who has pure devotion and does not seek the pleasures > of > > life > > > > nor is he worried about distress because the only thing that > > could > > > > cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and to > > acertain > > > > extent

Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A > > jignasu > > > > loves the Lord for his own sake and seeks to acquire the jnana > > which > > > > the Lord Himself gives as in the case of Udhdhava or through > > someone > > > > as He did for Parikshit.> > > > > > > > The last but not least is the jnani who has realised the truth > > about > > > > the Lord like Prahlada, Narada and other sages who were both > > bhakthas > > > > and jnanis.> > > > > > > > Besides, Ramanuja says in his sribhashya,> > > > 'dhyAnam cha thailadhArAvath avicchinna smrthisanthAna roopam,' > > > > continous flow of remembrance like the stream of continously > > dropping > > > > oil. 'DhruvA smrthih ;smrthilambhe sarvagranTheenAm

> > > > vipramokshah,'(Chan.7-26-2) when the constant,dhruva, > > remembrance, > > > > smrthih is attained all knots are rent asunder. Thus > > DHruvAsmrthi is > > > > prescribed as the means of liberation> > > > > > > > > > > > Saroja Ramanujam> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > .> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > May god bless you,> > > > > > > > Dr. Saroja Ramanujam, M.A., Ph.D, Siromani in > > sanskrit.> > > > > > > >> > > > -------------------------> > -------> > > > > > > > Everyone is raving about the

all-new Mail Beta. > > > > > > > <http://us.rd./evt=40791/*http://advision.webevents..co> > m/handraisers> > > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new > Click here> > Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click here> >> > > > > > > > India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new Click here> Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click

here>

India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new Click here

Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Sri Guruvayoorappan saranam,

 

I respect Sri. Ganapathy Raman ; and the focus is entirely on the

topic only and not the individuals discussing it . I wish to

explain further as follows .

 

1. RELEVANCE OF SRI GURUVAYOORAPPAN

 

QUOTE

 

" Again you say that Bhagawan will take care of running the temples.

In what way. ?Is He the chairman of the administrative board ?or is

He giving directions?. By chanting Narayana with full faith will all

the ills of the people automatically vanish?. Then why should one go

to the temple and make offerings instead of keeping quiet at home and

chanting Narayana all the time. "

 

UNQUOTE

 

Guruvayoorappan is a highly interactive Deity ; and He is in overall

control of the temple . ( For instance, when Tippu sultan's army

set fire to the Temple, it was saved due to timely rain ; and when

fire broke out in 1970, the Chuttambalam was only 3 yards off, but

still the fierce fire did not touch even the dry flower garlands,

which hung on the corner of the Sreekovil .) Occasionally people

having bad karma might cause a few problems for some time ; but

the end of storey is not in their favour. Reliable sources , closely

associated with the temple, have confirmed Bhagavan's revelations

through Devaprasna, chosen devotees, Tantris, Pujaris ,etc ; and the

crushing of culprits by strange coincidences .

 

The bhakti-yoga of ordinary devotees are based on Krishna's nama-

sankirtana and temple- worship . And their Atmic progress comes from

the efficacy of chanting Narayana-nama . Consequently , they get

rightly situated in `saranagati' ; and lead a life as Bhagavan's

insbeing guided by the Bhagavan through ` nimithams' ( symptoms).

 

2. GREAT SERVICES BY GURUVAYOOR TEMPLE

 

The offerings of devotees enable Guruavayoor temple to operate to

the vedic rules and to undertake numerous schemes for

vedic ,charity, educational and cultural activities.

A few of the several activities undertaken by Guruvayoor temple are

given below :

• Annadana every day for around 1500 persons. On special days

like Ashtami Rohini, Onam, Utsavam etc, around 10000-15000 devotees

take food here.

• Every year Guruvayoor temple spends a significant portion of

it's surplus income for assisting the financially backward temples

in Kerala.

• Every day food is sent to about 200 persons of the Municipal

orphanage and 100 children of the Kasthurbha child orphanage in the

Guruvayur Munucipality .

• Krishnanattam kalari ( training institute).

• Vedic publications .

• Cultural programs .

• Educational institutions.

• Medical facilities .

We all know how difficult and expensive it is to conduct a vedic puja

or a feast . As such just imagine the complexities involved in

operating a huge Vedic institution like Guruvayoor temple, the abode

of Sri Krishna .

 

In 1766 AD , tyrant Hyder Ali of Mysore captured the kingdom of

Calicut ; and due to insecurity pilgrims receded in Guruvayoor. The

supply of rice was stopped and the tenants stopped annual dues. It

was only due to Krishna's grace in the form of intervention by

Malabar Governor that the temple was saved from extinction. This

explains the relevance of offerings by devotees.

 

Muslims and Christians do have well organized Madrasas and Sunday

schools respectively to provide religious education to their

children . All what vedic believers have is temples . In a recent

press release, it is said that the Travancore Devaswom board has

1200 temples under it's control out of which only 85 are self

sufficient whereas the remaining are surviving form the funds coming

from the surplus income at Sabarimala and a few other major temples.

If the Hindu temple goers don't donate , who will finance to keep

alive the struggling vedic temples ????.

 

CHARITY (by Devotees)

 

Krishna's devotee is like a flower . When he blossoms in kirshna-

bhakty , the sweet aroma of sattvic compassion spreads around ; and

Bhagavan utilizes him most appropriately . The related benefits

flow to the needy ones through Sri Krishna's grace ; as arranged

for by Bhagavan Himself .

 

For instance , the rice collection proposed by Paramacharya is still

happening in the form of sponsored annadana in Krishna temples .

 

Opportunities to help others comes as a part of the service to Sri

Krishna , provided one is honest about his `saranagati ` ; and a

true devotee of Krishna doesn't fail to spend part of his/her

earnings to help the needy on behalf of Bhagavan .

 

Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya !!!

 

Krishnadaya.

------------------------

 

guruvayur , GANAPATHY RAMAN <agraman62

wrote:

>

> Well done Krishnadaya with your quotes from Bhagavatham.I wonder

where I hv pinpointed the irrelevance of Sri Guruvayurappan.Perhaps

you hv not studied my reply properly and not in a position to

assimilate what I hv said.You might hv carried by the thought that I

am against Sri Guruvayurappan.In that respect you are way away from

the tangent and your Krishna Consciousness aspect might

> hv made you to think like that.Your quotes from Bhagavatham are

laudable.I know what the late Paramacharya of Kanchi said abt the

rice separation by each family but that was in a different context

and I don't know that practice is still in existenceor not due to

efflex of time and the indifference of the bhakthas.I am sure you may

not be aware of this fact.The first para of your reply is sometype of

vitriolic comment which is not justifiable.You hv quoted some thing

which I hv never said- I mean the irrelevance of Sri

Guruvayurappan.Of course there are many origanisations who collect

funds and spend in whatever way they like.But just because they do it

is it necessary all people shuld follow suit?Strange logic.Where did

you find any adverse views of Sri Guruvayurappan?

>

> If you go thru my reply carefully you will find that I hv never

said anything abt Sri Guruvayurappan but only said the plight of poor

temples,downtrodden people,the

> reluctance of the rich to help the poor.At the same time that

those are things which will bring the Grace and Mercy of the God,if

some interest is shown to those aspects also.Under such circumstances

though you hv taken pains to quote from Bhagavatham,a great

effort,seem to be of only academic value when

> other pressing needs are not addressed.I know Annadhanam is

performed in GVR,Tripati,Udipi etc.In Dharmasthala it is a great

thing thruout the year.The same way many big temples hv such schemes

and this is not confined to GVR only..Further I hv never weaned away

the devotees from making anything in the

> form of vazhipadus and offerings when I hv said that all those

things depend on individual choices.Hence your comments carries no

weight though you may differ with my views the charge that I hv said

something against Sri Guruvayurappan is really preposterous.I wonder

how a Krishna bhaktha like you chose to write without studying what

other person has said and write something

> from imagination..Even in the very first para I hv said the

offerings,using funds etc are not our concern.Then where the shoe

pinches?I hv covered generally of all the big temples and never

confined myself to Guruvayur only.I stressed only the Bhakthy concept

which has nothing to do with the offerings only.Anyways I

> don't want to prolong this issue and your devotion to Krishna

thru Krishna Consciousness organisation must hv made you to say some

thing.As a good friend I wish you well and you need not be depressed

by such comments and carry on your duty according to the best of your

conscience. God Bless.

>

> Hare Krishna,

>

> agraman.

>

>

krishnadaya <krishnadaya wrote:

>

> Sri Guruvayoorappan Saranam,

>

> My humble pranams to Sri Guruvayoorapppan and all His devotees ,

>

> I respect Sri Ganapathy Raman , but differ with him on those

adverse

> views against Sri Guruvayoorappan's relevance. Millions of devotees

> have experienced the live presence of Lord Sri Krishna in

Guruvayoor

> temple ; and His deity is not inactive like the Kelappan statue

> outside. Not even a leaf will move inside the temple against

> Bhagavan's wish ; and this has been time and again revealed

> through chosen sources.

>

> Each devotee is dear to Bhagavan and this relationship is dependent

> on his/her past karma and degree of devotion . As a humble

worshipper

> of Sri Krishna's lotus feet , I am depending totally on the

chanting

> of Narayana-nama for everything and from it's strength endeavor to

> follow Bhagavan 's advice :

> • Do your duty, to the best of your abilities, for Me without

> any selfish motive, and remember Me at all times - before starting

a

> work, at the completion of a task, and while inactive.

> • Practice to look upon all creatures as Myself in thought,

> word, and deed ; and mentally bow down to them.

> • Although I the Supreme God, can never be captured by ordinary

> sense perception, My devotees may use their intelligence and

> perception (by bhakti-yoga) to directly search for Me through both

> apparent and indirect symptoms.

> • Awaken your dormant spiritual power (by bhakti-yoga)and

> perceive through the activities of mind, senses, breathing, and

> emotions that My power is within you at all times, and is

constantly

> doing all the work using you as a mere instrument " .

>

> PRESENT REALITIES

>

> In this age of cut throat competition and selfishness , modern

India

> ( ex- Bharatakhanda) as a nation has practically replaced it's

> sacred atmic approach with, hypocritical secularism (Godlessness) .

>

> Social work and charity have become big business these days ; and

> many of the related organizations fight each other to grab own

scope

> in the event of a natural calamity . In certain cases , even

> spirituality is being marketed cleverly ; and the same people ask

> their followers not to donate to Guruvayoor temple .

>

> There is no accountability for the huge funds being collected by

many

> anti-vedic social organizations and many of such funds are being

used

> to destabilize this ancient country which is still a thorn in the

> flesh of anti-vedic forces .

>

> Guruvayoor temple remains as a ray of hope for the struggling vedic

> faith and associated social well being .

>

> SCRIPTURAL JUSTIFICATION for OFFERINGS BY DEVOTEES

>

> Bhagavan Krishna advises Uddhava ( Srimad Bhagavatam Chapter

no.11 )

> on temple worship :

>

> SB 11.27.15 : One should worship Me in My Deity forms by offering

the

> most excellent paraphernalia . But a devotee completely freed from

> material desire may worship Me with whatever he is able to obtain,

> and may even worship Me within his heart with mental paraphernalia.

>

> SB 11.27.16-17 : In worshiping the temple Deity, my dear Uddhava,

> bathing and decoration are the most pleasing offerings . For the

> Deity traced on sacred ground, the process of tattva-viny & #257;sais

most

> dear. Oblations of sesame and barley soaked in ghee are the

preferred

> offering to the sacrificial fire, whereas worship consisting of

> upasth & #257;na and arghya is preferred for the sun. One should

worship Me

> in the form of water by offering water itself. Actually, whatever

is

> offered to Me with faith by My devotee — even if only a little

water —

> is most dear to Me.

>

> SB 11.27.18 : Even very opulent presentations do not satisfy Me if

> they are offered by nondevotees . But I am pleased by any

> insignificant offering made by My loving devotees, and I am

certainly

> most pleased when nice presentations of fragrant oil, incense,

> flowers and palatable foods are offered with love.

>

> SB 11.27.32 : My devotee should then lovingly decorate Me with

> clothing, a brahmana thread, various ornaments, marks of tilaka and

> garlands, and he should anoint My body with fragrant oils, all in

the

> prescribed manner.

>

> SB 11.27.33 : The worshiper should faithfully present Me with water

> for washing My feet and mouth, fragrant oils, flowers and unbroken

> grains, along with incense, lamps and other offerings.

>

> SB 11.27.34 : Within his means, the devotee should arrange to offer

> Me sugar candy, sweet rice, ghee, rice-flour cakes, various sweet

> cakes, steamed rice-flour dumplings filled with sweet coconut and

> sugar , wheat cakes made with ghee and milk and covered with sugar

> and spices], yogurt, vegetable soups and other palatable foods.

>

> SB 11.27.35 : On special occasions, and daily if possible, the

Deity

> should be massaged with ointment, shown a mirror, offered a

> eucalyptus stick for brushing His teeth, bathed with the five kinds

> of nectar, offered all kinds of opulent foods, and entertained with

> singing and dancing.

>

> SB 11.27.44 : Singing along with others, chanting loudly and

dancing,

> acting out My transcendental pastimes, and hearing and telling

> stories about Me, the devotee should for some time absorb himself

in

> such festivity.

>

> SB 11.27.45 : The devotee should offer homage to the Lord with all

> kinds of hymns and prayers, both from the Pur & #257;n & #803;as and

from other

> ancient scriptures, and also from ordinary traditions. Praying, " O

> Lord, please be merciful to me! " he should fall down flat like a

rod

> to offer his obeisances.

>

> SB 11.27.46 : Placing his head at the feet of the Deity, he should

> then stand with folded hands before the Lord and pray, " O my Lord,

> please protect me, who am surrendered unto You. I am most fearful

of

> this ocean of material existence, standing as I am in the mouth of

> death. "

>

> SB 11.27.47 : Praying in this way, the devotee should respectfully

> place upon his head the remnants I offer to him. And if the

> particular Deity is meant to be sent away at the end of the

worship,

> then this should be performed, the devotee once again placing the

> light of the Deity's presence inside the light of the lotus within

> his own heart.

>

> SB 11.27.48 : Whenever one develops faith in Me — in My form as the

> Deity or in other bona fide manifestations — one should worship Me

in

> that form. I certainly exist both within all created beings and

also

> separately in My original form, since I am the Supreme Soul of all.

>

> SB 11.27.49 : By worshiping Me through the various methods

prescribed

> in the Vedas and tantras, one will gain from Me his desired

> perfection in both this life and the next .

>

> SB 11.27.50 : The devotee should more fully establish My Deity by

> solidly constructing a temple, along with beautiful gardens. These

> gardens should be set aside to provide flowers for the regular

daily

> worship, special Deity processions and holiday observances.

>

> SB 11.27.51: One who offers the Deity gifts of land, markets,

cities

> and villages so that the regular daily worship and special

festivals

> of the Deity may go on continually will achieve opulence equal to

My

> own.

>

> SB 11.27.52 : By installing the Deity of the Lord one becomes king

of

> the entire earth, by building a temple for the Lord one becomes

ruler

> of the three worlds, by worshiping and serving the Deity one goes

to

> the planet of Lord Brahma and by performing all three of these

> activities one achieves a transcendental form like My own.

>

> SB 11.27.53: But one who simply engages in devotional service with

no

> consideration of fruitive results attains Me . Thus whoever

worships

> Me according to the process I have described will ultimately attain

> pure devotional service unto Me .

>

> SB 11.27.54 : Anyone who steals the property of the Devas or the

> brahmanas, whether originally given to them by himself or someone

> else, must live as a worm in stool for one hundred million years.

>

> SB 11.27.55 : Not only the performer of the theft but also anyone

who

> assists him, instigates the crime, or simply approves of it must

also

> share the reaction in the next life. According to their degree of

> participation, they each must suffer a proportionate consequence.

>

> MADHAVA SEVA IN A TEMPLE BECOMES MANAVA SEVA TOO

>

> Paramacharya Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswati Swamy said :

> " Every morning a handful of rice(uncooked) must be set apart for

the

> poor. All the families must do this without fail every day . The

rice

> thus kept must be collected from house to house, from quarter to

> quarter, cooked offered to the Deity of the local temple

> as " naivedya " and then distributed among the poor. With the handful

> of rice set apart for the poor, keep just one Rupee also. The

Rupees

> collected from each family would be sufficient to buy salt, chilli

> powder, etc, to mix with the rice to make it more palatable. It

would

> also serve to buy firewood and to pay the rent for the vessels. To

> carry out such a scheme is to do a great service to the poor - and

to

> the Lord. Charity like this should encourage temple going, not to

> speak of devotion. Since the food is first offered as " naivedya " ,

it

> would mean that the poor will take it as prasadam which will impart

> them inner purity.

> " Annadan " or the gift of food is one kind of service of paropakara.

> We talk of service to the poor, social service and so on. Today all

> this is done with much fanfare and publicity. In the past the needy

> were served naturally, without making any noise. Service comes

> under " purta- dharma " and it includes digging wells and ponds for

the

> public, feeding the poor, building temples for the spiritual well-

> being of people, laying our gardens. As we keep serving people in

> this way we will obtain inward purity . "

>

> Jagadguru K.K. Shankaracharya Swami wrote :

>

> " We enjoy the good things in life such as house, food, clothing,

> ornaments, music, dance, etc. We pay a tribute in the form of taxes

> to the king or to the government, for making it possible for us to

> enjoy them by giving us their protection. Even as we render homage

to

> the king for the enjoyment of these things, we are bound to render

> our gratitude to God who has

> primarily given us the good things of life.

>

> We offer a part of these good things as a token of our gratitude to

> Him in the temple. We first offer to the Lord all that He has given

> to us in the shape of food, clothing, jewels, music, flowers,

light,

> incense, etc., with the grateful consciousness that they are His

> gifts to us ; and we receive them back from Him as His PRASAAD. The

> temple is the place where these offerings are made on behalf of the

> collective community. Even if people do not go to the temple, it is

> enough if these offerings are made to God on behalf of the

community.

> The duty of the people at the place is to see that these offerings

> are made in the proper manner. "

>

> CONCLUSION

>

> In addition to bringing the devotees closer to Bhagavan ,

Guruvayoor

> temple also help thousands of people by feeding them directly or

> indirectly . It is the duty of all devotees to contribute for the

> smooth running of temples ; and to remove public misunderstandings

> caused by unfounded allegations.

>

> Om Namo Narayanaya !

>

> Krishnadaya

>

> --------------

> guruvayur , GANAPATHY RAMAN <agraman62@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Krishnadaya,

> >

> > It is quite some time that you hv not been heard in this

> Group.Here the question is not that of how the temples are

> administered or how the offerings of devotees

> > are utilised or what interests the devotees to make such

> offerings.As said that

> > depends on individual choices and there is no need to

> interfere.But regarding the

> > amounts collected by way of vazhipadus and how they are utilised

> nobody knows and that is also not our concern.The point is how such

> things can be correlated to the Bakthy concept?Do you wish to say

> that by offerings even though with full heart could be construed as

> Bhakthy?There are hundreds of people who just dump money in the

hundi

> which has become a custom and not a way of expressing Bhakthy.I hv

> seen in all the big temples .big bundles of notes are deposited in

> the hundi and do you think that can be termed as bhakthy?or is it

> some type of bargaining?There are hundreds of people who never

bother

> to contribute even token amounts to many deserving cases like the

> > Deaf and Dumb society,Blind society,Charitable institutions who

> run providing

> > succour to the orphans but they are prepared to put waddles of

> currencies in the hundis and as offerings as if God is in need of

> that.Why this change in their minds?Instead of dumping money in the

> hundis if they spend at least a portion to the needy,distressed

> people will not that bring them the Grace of God as all are His

> children and due to karma effects they hv born to suffer and giving

> them a helping hand,will not that please the God?It is said

> Manavaseva is Madhavaseva-when that is eloquently drummed up in

> platforms are all practicing

> > the same?By dumping money for the sake of upliftment of temples

> which are

> > already very rich what purpose does it serve when the teeming

> millions suffer in

> > desolation and despair?Do you not think that have nots shuld be

> protected by

> > those who hv the money power in the interest of God as all are

> His creatures?

> > Due to good karmas in the earlier births one may possess lot of

> wealth but shuld not the person think that the same shuld be

> distributed at least a portion

> > to the needy?

> >

> > I am not a preacher but I say from practical point of view and

> not to offend anybody.I know you hv enough knowledge to understand

> what I mean?You are also doing a great service and that too I know

in

> your own way which is surely

> > laudable.As a Krishna bhaktha you shuld hv the compassion to the

> down trodden also.Of course the whole world can't be made into a

> paradise overnight

> > by doling out to the needy people but those who do even a bit

> will surely enjoy

> > great peace and the Grace of God as He is not for the rich and

> vainglorious people but for the poor,unsung people as He has

> demonstrated in the case of

> > Kuchela.If the devotee is the instrument of Bhagawan Krishna

> whyshuld He make him to be a slave to the material gains without

> thinking abt His own brothers and sisters who are also the

> instruments of Him.So that argument carries no weight.It s because

> there is an element of ego in the minds of His instruments also

which

> even He finds it difficult to dilute.Again you say that Bhagawan

will

> take care of running the temples.In what way?Is He the chairman of

> the administrative board?or is He giving directions?In your

estimate

> how many temples come under the purview of GVR and Sabarimala

temples?

> Are all the temples properly taken care of by the Boards of the GVR

> and Sabarimala?

> >

> > Another fun is your advice not to worry and be happy.There is no

> dearth for happiness in me as I always possess equanimity of mind

> never bothering abt accolades or derisions as I know that is all

part

> of the game.By chanting Narayana with full faith will all the ills

of

> the people automatically vanish?Then why shuld one go to the temple

> and make offerings instead of keeping quiet at home and chanting

> Narayana all the time.Since you and I know that the same is not

> practical as the same won't make the world move as even Krishna has

> said

> > do your duty without expecting rewards simply chanting won't lead

> anybody

> > anywhere unless the same is also accompanied by the duty,love and

> devotion

> > and compassion to the fellow beings.That is the only way to get

> the Mercy and Grace OF God and this what all the scriptures also

> enunciate.Even Vasudeva

> > Krishna also reiterates the same thing.

> >

> > Krishnadaya,don't get upset over what I hv said as it is not my

> intention to wound your feelings.You hv said what you think to be a

> method and I just said what I felt.That is all.As I know you are a

> great Krishna bhaktha and doing good

> > services in your own humble way I hv just taken some liberty to

> bring to your

> > attention that there are many things beyond our control as Hamlet

> used to say

> > in Othello,'Horatio,there are many wonders in this world than

> what you imagine'.

> > In essence what I mean by Bhakthy has nothing to do with the so

> called offerings and vazhipadus though the same are left to the

> choice of the devotees as I myself don't know whether I am a

devotee

> or not and to what extent I hv

> > progressed in this field as it is an ocean and only God is the

> arbiter in such things.God Bless..

> >

> > Hare Krishna,

> > agraman.

> >

> >

> > krishnadaya <krishnadaya@> wrote:

> > Sri Guruvayoorappan saranam,

> >

> > A devotee is an instrument of the Bhagavan Sri Krishna ; and it

is

> > the Lord's power that is acting through him/her. It is quite

> natural

> > that , a devotee is grateful to the Bhagavan for His kindness ;

and

> > is always pleased to offer something in return.

> >

> > It is easy to criticise the Temple working systems in place , but

> > difficult to run it . There is no need for the devotee to worry

> about

> > the running of temple because Bhagavan is there to take care

> through

> > His own ways and means.

> >

> > The religious institutions of non-Hindu religions don't have any

> > public accountabilty whereas the Devaswam Boards are accountable

to

> > Government. Most of the small temples are run from the income of

> > Guruvayoor and Sabarimala.

> >

> > So let us be positive in our approach . Don't worry, be happy!!!!

> > Just chant Om Namo Narayanaya and leave the rest to Bhagavan.

> >

> > A Bhaktan

> >

> > guruvayur , GANAPATHY RAMAN <agraman62@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Of course for running the temple,paying salary etc money is

> > required but the point is who are the persons chalking out the

> > various vazhipadus and fixing rates?The temple authorities and

not

> > God.If the temple authorities say that to

> > > run the temple money is required and hence donate your might

they

> > won't get

> > > much but if they exhibit in boards that such and such

vazhipadus

> > can bring this and that benefit people are glad to contribute

> whether

> > the same materialises or

> > > not and so the authorities are trying to display a long list to

> > collect funds in this way which has nothing to do with Bhakthy or

> > God.This trend has become in vogue during the past decades

> > only.Centuries back there were no such things.

> > >

> > > Temples like Guruvayur or Sabarimala or Tripati attract

devotees

> > in millions and

> > > in this way the coffers also can overflow by the so called

> > vazhipadus.A devotee

> > > is happy iif he does some thulabharam with sugar or plantain or

> > anything by paying the rates fixed by the administration thinking

> > that God is pleased with his offering, and the administration is

> > happy that their bank balances increase which

> > > can be utilised and misutilised for various things.This is

> > actually what is happening in big temples.On the otherhand there

> are

> > innumerable temples which don't hv any income even to offer

> neivedyam

> > to the Deity or having enough oil even to light the lamps.Why the

> > devotees don't flock to those temples also and

> > > do the vazhipadus so that those temples too can see the light

of

> > the day.Is

> > > Guruvayurappan sits only in Guruvayur or Sastha sits only in

> > Sabarimalai when

> > > the all pervading God is in every atom and every idol why some

> > temples flourish and some suffer?Does that mean that people who

go

> to

> > those less fortunate

> > > temples are not devotees?In Tripati there is a custom that

> > everyday whatever

> > > money and other offerings come will be accounted before the

Deity

> > in the night

> > > but it is not known how the money is being spent and whether

the

> > Deity gives permission for all the expenses?There was even an

> attempt

> > years back that the

> > > amounts collected shuld be invested in Govt bonds thereby

> > diverting the funds of the temple but due to the protest of the

> > devotees the idea was shelved.

> > >

> > > There is noting wrong in collecting money for the

administration

> > of temple by

> > > means like vazhipadus but that can't be connected with Bhakthy

as

> > there is no

> > > sanction from the Deity for the same and it is only the temple

> > administration fixes the same.Years back in GVR udayasthamana

pooja

> > was fixed at Rs.5000

> > > but now I don't know the amount but certainly it must be 50000

> > and what is the

> > > guidelines for fixing such exhorbitant rates?The temple

> > administration members enjoy in all comforts from the so called

> > collections and that too everybody knows.Then how this collection

> can

> > be linked to ardent Bhakthy?Did the

> > > Deity of GVR or Sabarimala told the administration to collect

so

> > much money?

> > > So in the name of God all these are made.In a country like

India

> > with more than a billion people there is always the tendency to

> > resort to superstitions in beliefs

> > > and the eagerness to know abt the future thru astrology.If

there

> > is something

> > > wrong immediately it is decided to conduct an ashtamangalya

> > prasna is conducted.The astrologers say that God is furious

because

> > the surroundings are polluted and the devotees are not havig

proper

> > devotion,roads are not good and all such things.When the same is

> said

> > by media and people nobody bothers and when the astrologers say

> that

> > God is angry immedately steps are taken to ward

> > > off evils supposed to happen if the same are not done.Are they

> > not looking funny?

> > >

> > > My intention is not to fnd fault with anything that is going on

> > which everybody knows but the pertinent thing is that for a

Bhaktha

> > such things appear to be superfluous and when so many temples ae

> > suffering for lack of funs why certain important temples alone

take

> > the cakes when we accept that God is everywhere.There is no

> > explanation for this anamoly and the same will continue.

> > > So by doing vazhipadus and offerings the temple coffers can be

> > filled up but not lead one to Real Bhakthy.Was there such a

system

> > during the days of Bhattathiri and Poonthanam?Because those days

> they

> > had so much love and

> > > devotion to God and never bothered abt other things..Now the

> > trend has changed and money takes the upper hand over Real

> > Bhakthy.What a pity?

> > >

> > > If anybody is offended by these comments I express regret as I

hv

> > only stated what I felt and to enforce the fact that Bhakthy has

> > nothing to do with the so

> > > called offerings and the same depends on individual choices and

> > not on the

> > > choice of people running temple administration.

> > >

> > >

> > > Hare Krishna.

> > >

> > >

> > > hba9331 <pravin9@> wrote:

> > > Om Namo Narayanaya

> > > A very good topic to discuss on this forum. Everybody should

> > > earnestly participate...since there are bound to be various

> > > questions coming up in our mind...one such question I have

> > >

> > > It was discussed in one of the Books of AMMA that Guruvayoor

does

> > > not need any of our material offerings in cash or kind, all

those

> > > goes to the funding account. But if the below concept is

followed

> > it

> > > would be very difficult to maintain the temple and the

> > > infrastructure needed and the salary to be paid to various

> > employee.

> > > We in Kerala do not have the concept of KARSEVA as with the

Sikh

> > > community where free service is also an offering. The give and

> take

> > > concept if discouraged would have far reaching consequence on

the

> > > day to day working of such institution...I have my own doubts

if

> > the

> > > Hindu system would work purely on the Bakthi concept. Currently

> > when

> > > some bad time falls on us, we run to Guruvayoorappan, same way

as

> a

> > > child runs to his/her parents when they are in trouble or even

> when

> > > they have a bad dream...but since we are not kids we feel it

> would

> > > not be fair to go empty handed so promise Guruvayoorappan

certain

> > > Vazipadu....more over even the Vazipadus are classified into do

> > this

> > > and you get this..do that and that for good health...etc..

> > >

> > > I shall be very thankful if these doubts are cleared by the

good

> > > members in our forum.

> > >

> > > Narayana Narayana.....

> > >

> > > Pravin

> > >

> > > guruvayur , " K.V Gopalakrishna "

> > > <gopalakrishna.kv@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Mataji,

> > > > Radhe Krishna!

> > > >

> > > > I agree with you one hundred per cent. With due regard to

what

> > > Shri

> > > > Ganapathy Raman and Krishna Prasad have said, in some cases,

it

> > is

> > > a

> > > > fact that complacency creeps in when one acquires the object

he

> > > has been

> > > > longing for. This complacency makes him too jubilant, raising

> > > his ego

> > > > level so high, that he forgets for a time, that what he has

> > > acquired is

> > > > by divine grace also. I have deliberately added the

word " also "

> > > > because many people think that one's hard work was

responsible

> > for

> > > his

> > > > upliftment in life, or that it was the cleverness of the

doctor

> > > and the

> > > > efficacy of the medicine that has cured him. I would like to

> > > reiterate

> > > > here that hard work is definitely required to be done if one

> > wants

> > > to

> > > > come up in life. Similarly, the doctor's experience and the

> > > efficacy

> > > > of the medicine play a very important part in curing the

> > > disease. But

> > > > all these require divine grace to have their effect. Without

> > > that, no

> > > > medicine will work, and any amount of hard work will not pay.

> > > People

> > > > have the habit of blaming God when something wrong happens

> > without

> > > > realising that the bad that has happened is result of one's

own

> > > Karma.

> > > > Let us not forget that even to think of God, His grace is

> > > required.

> > > > " Iswaranugrahad eva bhakthirbhavathi Kesave! "

> > > >

> > > > Promising to perform a particular " vazhipadu " to God if He

> > favours

> > > etc.,

> > > > like performing a " Tulabharam " if one gets cured of his

ailment

> > > etc., is

> > > > an inferior type of Bhakti. On the face of the person's

promise

> > > and

> > > > cure of the disease, it may look as though the person got

cured

> > > because

> > > > of the promise made. But really speaking, it is not so. It is

> > > the

> > > > person's belief on one side and the fruits of Karma on the

> other

> > > cured

> > > > him. The Lord will accept anything if offered with Bhakti.

> > > But what

> > > > He wants is Bhakti and Bhakti alone.

> > > >

> > > > Regards

> > > > KVG.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Saroja Ramanujam wrote:

> > > >

> > > > > Well said Gopalakrishnan!

> > > > > I think that perhaps it is relevant here to examine the

> > > following

> > > > > sloka from Gita.

> > > > >

> > > > > Chathurvidhaa bajanthe maamjanaah sukrthino arjuna

> > > > > aatho jignaasurarthaartheejnaanee cha bharathrshbha

> > > > > Krishna says,

> > > > > 'Four types of devotees of noble deeds worship Me,

Arjuna,the

> > > seeker

> > > > > after worldly possessions, the afflicted,the seeker for

> > > knowledge and

> > > > > the man of wisdom, O best of Bharathas A man who believes

in

> > God

> > > prays

> > > > > for the fulfilment of his cherished objects of the

> world,wealth

> > > or

> > > > > child and so on. When he gets them as a result of his

prayer

> > his

> > > > > devotion is strengthened and develops into faith.If he has

> not

> > > already

> > > > > acquired faith he will lose belief if his desire is not

> > > fulfilled.This

> > > > > is why we often hear the cry 'I no more believe in God,'

from

> > > those

> > > > > who face disappointments in life.

> > > > > Sugreeva and dhruva can be cited as examples of arthaarthee

> > type

> > > of

> > > > > devotees, the former devoloped faith after the fulfilment

of

> > his

> > > > > desire while Dhruva had both faith and beliefand became a

> jnani

> > > later,

> > > > > elevated to the status of dhruva star.

> > > > > The second kind of devotee who seeks God as his sole refuge

> > when

> > > in

> > > > > distress like Droupadi or Gajendra are aarthees with

staunch

> > > faith

> > > > > that He alone is their saviour, which is termed as

> > > mahavisvasam ,among

> > > > > the five requisites of saranagathi. They do not seek Him

for

> > > worldly

> > > > > pleasures but remain ardent devotees through out their life

> > > which

> > > > > alone will make them call out to Him in earnest.In normal

> life

> > > we do

> > > > > not have that faith in God eventhough we have belief in Him

> and

> > > > > therefore we suffer in consequenceHere comes the importance

> of

> > > the

> > > > > word 'sukrthinah' which Krishna uses to describe the four

> kinds

> > > of

> > > > > devotees. To think of God and yearn for His mercy requires

> > > > > poorvajanmapunya. There is a story to illustrate this.

> > > > > A man who was a confirmed sinner was sitting on a tree and

> Lord

> > > Siva

> > > > > happened to pass that way with Parvathi. Siva told Parvathi

> > that

> > > the

> > > > > man is going to fall from the tree and die since it is his

> > fate.

> > > > > Parvathi, being the divine mother, took pity on the man and

> > said

> > > that

> > > > > they should save him to which Siva replied that it was his

> > karma

> > > being

> > > > > a sinner to die such a death.When Parvathi remonstrated

with

> > him

> > > Siva

> > > > > said that He will save the man if he cries out 'appa' and

she

> > > should

> > > > > save him if he says 'amma' when he falls. Parvathi was

happy

> > > without

> > > > > realising the real purport of Siva's words.The branch on

> which

> > > the man

> > > > > was sitting broke and he fell down crying'aiyo,' because he

> did

> > > not

> > > > > have the sukrthi to call God's name at the time of death

> > > > > Jignasu is one who has pure devotion and does not seek the

> > > pleasures

> > > > > of life nor is he worried about distress because the only

> thing

> > > that

> > > > > could cause pain to him is being away from the Lord.

Uddhava

> > and

> > > to

> > > > > acertain extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of

> > > Bhakthi. A

> > > > > jignasu who has pure devotion and does not seek the

pleasures

> > of

> > > life

> > > > > nor is he worried about distress because the only thing

that

> > > could

> > > > > cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and

to

> > > acertain

> > > > > extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A

> > > jignasu

> > > > > loves the Lord for his own sake and seeks to acquire the

> jnana

> > > which

> > > > > the Lord Himself gives as in the case of Udhdhava or

through

> > > someone

> > > > > as He did for Parikshit.

> > > > >

> > > > > The last but not least is the jnani who has realised the

> truth

> > > about

> > > > > the Lord like Prahlada, Narada and other sages who were

both

> > > bhakthas

> > > > > and jnanis.

> > > > >

> > > > > Besides, Ramanuja says in his sribhashya,

> > > > > 'dhyAnam cha thailadhArAvath avicchinna smrthisanthAna

> roopam,'

> > > > > continous flow of remembrance like the stream of

continously

> > > dropping

> > > > > oil. 'DhruvA smrthih ;smrthilambhe sarvagranTheenAm

> > > > > vipramokshah,'(Chan.7-26-2) when the constant,dhruva,

> > > remembrance,

> > > > > smrthih is attained all knots are rent asunder. Thus

> > > DHruvAsmrthi is

> > > > > prescribed as the means of liberation

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Saroja Ramanujam

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > .

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > May god bless you,

> > > > >

> > > > > Dr. Saroja Ramanujam, M.A., Ph.D, Siromani in

> > > sanskrit.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > -------------------------

> > > -------

> > > > >

> > > > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail Beta.

> > > > >

> > >

> >

>

<http://us.rd./evt=40791/*http://advision.webevents..co

> > > m/handraisers>

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new

> > Click here

> > > Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click

> here

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new

> Click here

> > Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click

here

> >

 

> India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new

Click here

> Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click here

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Ok Krishnadaya.Still you hv not been able to grasp the niceties of what I hv stated.I am not for any further controversy or to wound the feelings of the devotees.So let us close this chapter May God Bless you.krishnadaya <krishnadaya wrote: Sri Guruvayoorappan saranam,I respect Sri. Ganapathy Raman ; and the focus is entirely on the topic only and not the individuals discussing it . I wish to explain further as follows .

1. RELEVANCE OF SRI GURUVAYOORAPPANQUOTE" Again you say that Bhagawan will take care of running the temples. In what way. ?Is He the chairman of the administrative board ?or is He giving directions?. By chanting Narayana with full faith will all the ills of the people automatically vanish?. Then why should one go to the temple and make offerings instead of keeping quiet at home and chanting Narayana all the time. "UNQUOTEGuruvayoorappan is a highly interactive Deity ; and He is in overall control of the temple . ( For instance, when Tippu sultan's army set fire to the Temple, it was saved due to timely rain ; and when fire broke out in 1970, the Chuttambalam was only 3 yards off, but still the fierce fire did not touch even the dry flower garlands, which hung on the corner of the Sreekovil .) Occasionally people having bad karma might cause a few problems for some time ; but the end of

storey is not in their favour. Reliable sources , closely associated with the temple, have confirmed Bhagavan's revelations through Devaprasna, chosen devotees, Tantris, Pujaris ,etc ; and the crushing of culprits by strange coincidences . The bhakti-yoga of ordinary devotees are based on Krishna's nama-sankirtana and temple- worship . And their Atmic progress comes from the efficacy of chanting Narayana-nama . Consequently , they get rightly situated in `saranagati' ; and lead a life as Bhagavan's insbeing guided by the Bhagavan through ` nimithams' ( symptoms).2. GREAT SERVICES BY GURUVAYOOR TEMPLEThe offerings of devotees enable Guruavayoor temple to operate to the vedic rules and to undertake numerous schemes for vedic ,charity, educational and cultural activities. A few of the several activities undertaken by Guruvayoor temple are given below :• Annadana every day for around 1500 persons. On

special days like Ashtami Rohini, Onam, Utsavam etc, around 10000-15000 devotees take food here.• Every year Guruvayoor temple spends a significant portion of it's surplus income for assisting the financially backward temples in Kerala. • Every day food is sent to about 200 persons of the Municipal orphanage and 100 children of the Kasthurbha child orphanage in the Guruvayur Munucipality .• Krishnanattam kalari ( training institute).• Vedic publications .• Cultural programs . • Educational institutions.• Medical facilities . We all know how difficult and expensive it is to conduct a vedic puja or a feast . As such just imagine the complexities involved in operating a huge Vedic institution like Guruvayoor temple, the abode of Sri Krishna . In 1766 AD , tyrant Hyder Ali of Mysore captured the kingdom of Calicut ; and due to insecurity pilgrims receded in Guruvayoor. The supply of rice was

stopped and the tenants stopped annual dues. It was only due to Krishna's grace in the form of intervention by Malabar Governor that the temple was saved from extinction. This explains the relevance of offerings by devotees. Muslims and Christians do have well organized Madrasas and Sunday schools respectively to provide religious education to their children . All what vedic believers have is temples . In a recent press release, it is said that the Travancore Devaswom board has 1200 temples under it's control out of which only 85 are self sufficient whereas the remaining are surviving form the funds coming from the surplus income at Sabarimala and a few other major temples. If the Hindu temple goers don't donate , who will finance to keep alive the struggling vedic temples ????.CHARITY (by Devotees) Krishna's devotee is like a flower . When he blossoms in kirshna-bhakty , the sweet aroma of sattvic

compassion spreads around ; and Bhagavan utilizes him most appropriately . The related benefits flow to the needy ones through Sri Krishna's grace ; as arranged for by Bhagavan Himself . For instance , the rice collection proposed by Paramacharya is still happening in the form of sponsored annadana in Krishna temples . Opportunities to help others comes as a part of the service to Sri Krishna , provided one is honest about his `saranagati ` ; and a true devotee of Krishna doesn't fail to spend part of his/her earnings to help the needy on behalf of Bhagavan . Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya !!!Krishnadaya. ------------------------guruvayur , GANAPATHY RAMAN <agraman62 wrote:>> Well done Krishnadaya with your quotes from Bhagavatham.I

wonder where I hv pinpointed the irrelevance of Sri Guruvayurappan.Perhaps you hv not studied my reply properly and not in a position to assimilate what I hv said.You might hv carried by the thought that I am against Sri Guruvayurappan.In that respect you are way away from the tangent and your Krishna Consciousness aspect might > hv made you to think like that.Your quotes from Bhagavatham are laudable.I know what the late Paramacharya of Kanchi said abt the rice separation by each family but that was in a different context and I don't know that practice is still in existenceor not due to efflex of time and the indifference of the bhakthas.I am sure you may not be aware of this fact.The first para of your reply is sometype of vitriolic comment which is not justifiable.You hv quoted some thing which I hv never said- I mean the irrelevance of Sri Guruvayurappan.Of course there are many

origanisations who collect funds and spend in whatever way they like.But just because they do it is it necessary all people shuld follow suit?Strange logic.Where did you find any adverse views of Sri Guruvayurappan?> > If you go thru my reply carefully you will find that I hv never said anything abt Sri Guruvayurappan but only said the plight of poor temples,downtrodden people,the > reluctance of the rich to help the poor.At the same time that those are things which will bring the Grace and Mercy of the God,if some interest is shown to those aspects also.Under such circumstances though you hv taken pains to quote from Bhagavatham,a great effort,seem to be of only academic value when> other pressing needs are not addressed.I know Annadhanam is performed in GVR,Tripati,Udipi etc.In Dharmasthala it is a great thing thruout the year.The same way many big temples hv such schemes and this is

not confined to GVR only..Further I hv never weaned away the devotees from making anything in the > form of vazhipadus and offerings when I hv said that all those things depend on individual choices.Hence your comments carries no weight though you may differ with my views the charge that I hv said something against Sri Guruvayurappan is really preposterous.I wonder how a Krishna bhaktha like you chose to write without studying what other person has said and write something > from imagination..Even in the very first para I hv said the offerings,using funds etc are not our concern.Then where the shoe pinches?I hv covered generally of all the big temples and never confined myself to Guruvayur only.I stressed only the Bhakthy concept which has nothing to do with the offerings only.Anyways I > don't want to prolong this issue and your devotion to Krishna thru Krishna Consciousness organisation must hv

made you to say some thing.As a good friend I wish you well and you need not be depressed by such comments and carry on your duty according to the best of your conscience. God Bless.> > Hare Krishna,> > agraman.> > > > > > > > > krishnadaya <krishnadaya wrote:> > Sri Guruvayoorappan Saranam,> > My humble pranams to Sri Guruvayoorapppan and all His devotees ,> > I respect Sri Ganapathy Raman , but differ with him on those adverse > views against Sri Guruvayoorappan's relevance. Millions of devotees > have experienced the live presence of Lord Sri Krishna in Guruvayoor > temple ; and His deity is not inactive like the Kelappan statue > outside. Not even a leaf will move inside the temple against > Bhagavan's wish ; and this has been time and again revealed >

through chosen sources. > > Each devotee is dear to Bhagavan and this relationship is dependent > on his/her past karma and degree of devotion . As a humble worshipper > of Sri Krishna's lotus feet , I am depending totally on the chanting > of Narayana-nama for everything and from it's strength endeavor to > follow Bhagavan 's advice :> • Do your duty, to the best of your abilities, for Me without > any selfish motive, and remember Me at all times - before starting a > work, at the completion of a task, and while inactive. > • Practice to look upon all creatures as Myself in thought, > word, and deed ; and mentally bow down to them. > • Although I the Supreme God, can never be captured by ordinary > sense perception, My devotees may use their intelligence and > perception (by bhakti-yoga) to directly search for Me through both > apparent and indirect

symptoms. > • Awaken your dormant spiritual power (by bhakti-yoga)and > perceive through the activities of mind, senses, breathing, and > emotions that My power is within you at all times, and is constantly > doing all the work using you as a mere instrument".> > PRESENT REALITIES> > In this age of cut throat competition and selfishness , modern India > ( ex- Bharatakhanda) as a nation has practically replaced it's > sacred atmic approach with, hypocritical secularism (Godlessness) . > > Social work and charity have become big business these days ; and > many of the related organizations fight each other to grab own scope > in the event of a natural calamity . In certain cases , even > spirituality is being marketed cleverly ; and the same people ask > their followers not to donate to Guruvayoor temple . > > There is no

accountability for the huge funds being collected by many > anti-vedic social organizations and many of such funds are being used > to destabilize this ancient country which is still a thorn in the > flesh of anti-vedic forces . > > Guruvayoor temple remains as a ray of hope for the struggling vedic > faith and associated social well being . > > SCRIPTURAL JUSTIFICATION for OFFERINGS BY DEVOTEES> > Bhagavan Krishna advises Uddhava ( Srimad Bhagavatam Chapter no.11 ) > on temple worship :> > SB 11.27.15 : One should worship Me in My Deity forms by offering the > most excellent paraphernalia . But a devotee completely freed from > material desire may worship Me with whatever he is able to obtain, > and may even worship Me within his heart with mental paraphernalia.> > SB 11.27.16-17 : In worshiping the temple Deity, my dear Uddhava,

> bathing and decoration are the most pleasing offerings . For the > Deity traced on sacred ground, the process of tattva-viny & #257;sais most > dear. Oblations of sesame and barley soaked in ghee are the preferred > offering to the sacrificial fire, whereas worship consisting of > upasth & #257;na and arghya is preferred for the sun. One should worship Me > in the form of water by offering water itself. Actually, whatever is > offered to Me with faith by My devotee — even if only a little water —> is most dear to Me.> > SB 11.27.18 : Even very opulent presentations do not satisfy Me if > they are offered by nondevotees . But I am pleased by any > insignificant offering made by My loving devotees, and I am certainly > most pleased when nice presentations of fragrant oil, incense, > flowers and palatable foods are offered with

love.> > SB 11.27.32 : My devotee should then lovingly decorate Me with > clothing, a brahmana thread, various ornaments, marks of tilaka and > garlands, and he should anoint My body with fragrant oils, all in the > prescribed manner.> > SB 11.27.33 : The worshiper should faithfully present Me with water > for washing My feet and mouth, fragrant oils, flowers and unbroken > grains, along with incense, lamps and other offerings.> > SB 11.27.34 : Within his means, the devotee should arrange to offer > Me sugar candy, sweet rice, ghee, rice-flour cakes, various sweet > cakes, steamed rice-flour dumplings filled with sweet coconut and > sugar , wheat cakes made with ghee and milk and covered with sugar > and spices], yogurt, vegetable soups and other palatable foods.> > SB 11.27.35 : On special occasions, and daily if possible, the Deity >

should be massaged with ointment, shown a mirror, offered a > eucalyptus stick for brushing His teeth, bathed with the five kinds > of nectar, offered all kinds of opulent foods, and entertained with > singing and dancing.> > SB 11.27.44 : Singing along with others, chanting loudly and dancing, > acting out My transcendental pastimes, and hearing and telling > stories about Me, the devotee should for some time absorb himself in > such festivity.> > SB 11.27.45 : The devotee should offer homage to the Lord with all > kinds of hymns and prayers, both from the Pur & #257;n & #803;as and from other > ancient scriptures, and also from ordinary traditions. Praying, "O > Lord, please be merciful to me! "he should fall down flat like a rod > to offer his obeisances.> > SB 11.27.46 : Placing his head at the feet of the Deity, he should >

then stand with folded hands before the Lord and pray, "O my Lord, > please protect me, who am surrendered unto You. I am most fearful of > this ocean of material existence, standing as I am in the mouth of > death."> > SB 11.27.47 : Praying in this way, the devotee should respectfully > place upon his head the remnants I offer to him. And if the > particular Deity is meant to be sent away at the end of the worship, > then this should be performed, the devotee once again placing the > light of the Deity's presence inside the light of the lotus within > his own heart.> > SB 11.27.48 : Whenever one develops faith in Me — in My form as the > Deity or in other bona fide manifestations — one should worship Me in > that form. I certainly exist both within all created beings and also > separately in My original form, since I am the Supreme Soul of all.>

> SB 11.27.49 : By worshiping Me through the various methods prescribed > in the Vedas and tantras, one will gain from Me his desired > perfection in both this life and the next .> > SB 11.27.50 : The devotee should more fully establish My Deity by > solidly constructing a temple, along with beautiful gardens. These > gardens should be set aside to provide flowers for the regular daily > worship, special Deity processions and holiday observances.> > SB 11.27.51: One who offers the Deity gifts of land, markets, cities > and villages so that the regular daily worship and special festivals > of the Deity may go on continually will achieve opulence equal to My > own.> > SB 11.27.52 : By installing the Deity of the Lord one becomes king of > the entire earth, by building a temple for the Lord one becomes ruler > of the three worlds,

by worshiping and serving the Deity one goes to > the planet of Lord Brahma and by performing all three of these > activities one achieves a transcendental form like My own.> > SB 11.27.53: But one who simply engages in devotional service with no > consideration of fruitive results attains Me . Thus whoever worships > Me according to the process I have described will ultimately attain > pure devotional service unto Me .> > SB 11.27.54 : Anyone who steals the property of the Devas or the > brahmanas, whether originally given to them by himself or someone > else, must live as a worm in stool for one hundred million years.> > SB 11.27.55 : Not only the performer of the theft but also anyone who > assists him, instigates the crime, or simply approves of it must also > share the reaction in the next life. According to their degree of >

participation, they each must suffer a proportionate consequence.> > MADHAVA SEVA IN A TEMPLE BECOMES MANAVA SEVA TOO> > Paramacharya Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswati Swamy said : > " Every morning a handful of rice(uncooked) must be set apart for the > poor. All the families must do this without fail every day . The rice > thus kept must be collected from house to house, from quarter to > quarter, cooked offered to the Deity of the local temple > as "naivedya" and then distributed among the poor. With the handful > of rice set apart for the poor, keep just one Rupee also. The Rupees > collected from each family would be sufficient to buy salt, chilli > powder, etc, to mix with the rice to make it more palatable. It would > also serve to buy firewood and to pay the rent for the vessels. To > carry out such a scheme is to do a great service to the poor - and

to > the Lord. Charity like this should encourage temple going, not to > speak of devotion. Since the food is first offered as "naivedya", it > would mean that the poor will take it as prasadam which will impart > them inner purity. > "Annadan" or the gift of food is one kind of service of paropakara. > We talk of service to the poor, social service and so on. Today all > this is done with much fanfare and publicity. In the past the needy > were served naturally, without making any noise. Service comes > under "purta- dharma" and it includes digging wells and ponds for the > public, feeding the poor, building temples for the spiritual well-> being of people, laying our gardens. As we keep serving people in > this way we will obtain inward purity . "> > Jagadguru K.K. Shankaracharya Swami wrote :> > " We enjoy the good things in life such as house,

food, clothing, > ornaments, music, dance, etc. We pay a tribute in the form of taxes > to the king or to the government, for making it possible for us to > enjoy them by giving us their protection. Even as we render homage to > the king for the enjoyment of these things, we are bound to render > our gratitude to God who has > primarily given us the good things of life.> > We offer a part of these good things as a token of our gratitude to > Him in the temple. We first offer to the Lord all that He has given > to us in the shape of food, clothing, jewels, music, flowers, light, > incense, etc., with the grateful consciousness that they are His > gifts to us ; and we receive them back from Him as His PRASAAD. The > temple is the place where these offerings are made on behalf of the > collective community. Even if people do not go to the temple, it is > enough if

these offerings are made to God on behalf of the community. > The duty of the people at the place is to see that these offerings > are made in the proper manner."> > CONCLUSION> > In addition to bringing the devotees closer to Bhagavan , Guruvayoor > temple also help thousands of people by feeding them directly or > indirectly . It is the duty of all devotees to contribute for the > smooth running of temples ; and to remove public misunderstandings > caused by unfounded allegations.> > Om Namo Narayanaya !> > Krishnadaya> > --------------> guruvayur , GANAPATHY RAMAN <agraman62@> > wrote:> >> > Dear Krishnadaya,> > > > It is quite some time that you hv not been heard in

this > Group.Here the question is not that of how the temples are > administered or how the offerings of devotees> > are utilised or what interests the devotees to make such > offerings.As said that > > depends on individual choices and there is no need to > interfere.But regarding the > > amounts collected by way of vazhipadus and how they are utilised > nobody knows and that is also not our concern.The point is how such > things can be correlated to the Bakthy concept?Do you wish to say > that by offerings even though with full heart could be construed as > Bhakthy?There are hundreds of people who just dump money in the hundi > which has become a custom and not a way of expressing Bhakthy.I hv > seen in all the big temples .big bundles of notes are deposited in > the hundi and do you think that can be termed as bhakthy?or is it > some type of

bargaining?There are hundreds of people who never bother > to contribute even token amounts to many deserving cases like the > > Deaf and Dumb society,Blind society,Charitable institutions who > run providing> > succour to the orphans but they are prepared to put waddles of > currencies in the hundis and as offerings as if God is in need of > that.Why this change in their minds?Instead of dumping money in the > hundis if they spend at least a portion to the needy,distressed > people will not that bring them the Grace of God as all are His > children and due to karma effects they hv born to suffer and giving > them a helping hand,will not that please the God?It is said > Manavaseva is Madhavaseva-when that is eloquently drummed up in > platforms are all practicing > > the same?By dumping money for the sake of upliftment of temples > which are > >

already very rich what purpose does it serve when the teeming > millions suffer in > > desolation and despair?Do you not think that have nots shuld be > protected by> > those who hv the money power in the interest of God as all are > His creatures?> > Due to good karmas in the earlier births one may possess lot of > wealth but shuld not the person think that the same shuld be > distributed at least a portion > > to the needy?> > > > I am not a preacher but I say from practical point of view and > not to offend anybody.I know you hv enough knowledge to understand > what I mean?You are also doing a great service and that too I know in > your own way which is surely> > laudable.As a Krishna bhaktha you shuld hv the compassion to the > down trodden also.Of course the whole world can't be made into a > paradise overnight> > by

doling out to the needy people but those who do even a bit > will surely enjoy> > great peace and the Grace of God as He is not for the rich and > vainglorious people but for the poor,unsung people as He has > demonstrated in the case of> > Kuchela.If the devotee is the instrument of Bhagawan Krishna > whyshuld He make him to be a slave to the material gains without > thinking abt His own brothers and sisters who are also the > instruments of Him.So that argument carries no weight.It s because > there is an element of ego in the minds of His instruments also which > even He finds it difficult to dilute.Again you say that Bhagawan will > take care of running the temples.In what way?Is He the chairman of > the administrative board?or is He giving directions?In your estimate > how many temples come under the purview of GVR and Sabarimala temples?> Are all

the temples properly taken care of by the Boards of the GVR > and Sabarimala?> > > > Another fun is your advice not to worry and be happy.There is no > dearth for happiness in me as I always possess equanimity of mind > never bothering abt accolades or derisions as I know that is all part > of the game.By chanting Narayana with full faith will all the ills of > the people automatically vanish?Then why shuld one go to the temple > and make offerings instead of keeping quiet at home and chanting > Narayana all the time.Since you and I know that the same is not > practical as the same won't make the world move as even Krishna has > said > > do your duty without expecting rewards simply chanting won't lead > anybody > > anywhere unless the same is also accompanied by the duty,love and > devotion> > and compassion to the fellow beings.That is

the only way to get > the Mercy and Grace OF God and this what all the scriptures also > enunciate.Even Vasudeva> > Krishna also reiterates the same thing.> > > > Krishnadaya,don't get upset over what I hv said as it is not my > intention to wound your feelings.You hv said what you think to be a > method and I just said what I felt.That is all.As I know you are a > great Krishna bhaktha and doing good > > services in your own humble way I hv just taken some liberty to > bring to your > > attention that there are many things beyond our control as Hamlet > used to say > > in Othello,'Horatio,there are many wonders in this world than > what you imagine'.> > In essence what I mean by Bhakthy has nothing to do with the so > called offerings and vazhipadus though the same are left to the > choice of the devotees as I myself don't

know whether I am a devotee > or not and to what extent I hv > > progressed in this field as it is an ocean and only God is the > arbiter in such things.God Bless..> > > > Hare Krishna,> > agraman.> > > > > > krishnadaya <krishnadaya@> wrote:> > Sri Guruvayoorappan saranam,> > > > A devotee is an instrument of the Bhagavan Sri Krishna ; and it is > > the Lord's power that is acting through him/her. It is quite > natural > > that , a devotee is grateful to the Bhagavan for His kindness ; and > > is always pleased to offer something in return. > > > > It is easy to criticise the Temple working systems in place , but > > difficult to run it . There is no need for the devotee to worry > about > > the running of temple because Bhagavan is there to take care

> through > > His own ways and means. > > > > The religious institutions of non-Hindu religions don't have any > > public accountabilty whereas the Devaswam Boards are accountable to > > Government. Most of the small temples are run from the income of > > Guruvayoor and Sabarimala. > > > > So let us be positive in our approach . Don't worry, be happy!!!!> > Just chant Om Namo Narayanaya and leave the rest to Bhagavan.> > > > A Bhaktan> > > > guruvayur , GANAPATHY RAMAN <agraman62@> > > wrote:> > >> > > > > > > > > Of course for running the temple,paying salary etc money is > > required but the point is who are the persons chalking out the > > various vazhipadus and fixing

rates?The temple authorities and not > > God.If the temple authorities say that to > > > run the temple money is required and hence donate your might they > > won't get > > > much but if they exhibit in boards that such and such vazhipadus > > can bring this and that benefit people are glad to contribute > whether > > the same materialises or> > > not and so the authorities are trying to display a long list to > > collect funds in this way which has nothing to do with Bhakthy or > > God.This trend has become in vogue during the past decades > > only.Centuries back there were no such things.> > > > > > Temples like Guruvayur or Sabarimala or Tripati attract devotees > > in millions and> > > in this way the coffers also can overflow by the so called > > vazhipadus.A devotee > >

> is happy iif he does some thulabharam with sugar or plantain or > > anything by paying the rates fixed by the administration thinking > > that God is pleased with his offering, and the administration is > > happy that their bank balances increase which > > > can be utilised and misutilised for various things.This is > > actually what is happening in big temples.On the otherhand there > are > > innumerable temples which don't hv any income even to offer > neivedyam > > to the Deity or having enough oil even to light the lamps.Why the > > devotees don't flock to those temples also and> > > do the vazhipadus so that those temples too can see the light of > > the day.Is> > > Guruvayurappan sits only in Guruvayur or Sastha sits only in > > Sabarimalai when > > > the all pervading God is in every atom and every idol

why some > > temples flourish and some suffer?Does that mean that people who go > to > > those less fortunate > > > temples are not devotees?In Tripati there is a custom that > > everyday whatever > > > money and other offerings come will be accounted before the Deity > > in the night> > > but it is not known how the money is being spent and whether the > > Deity gives permission for all the expenses?There was even an > attempt > > years back that the > > > amounts collected shuld be invested in Govt bonds thereby > > diverting the funds of the temple but due to the protest of the > > devotees the idea was shelved.> > > > > > There is noting wrong in collecting money for the administration > > of temple by > > > means like vazhipadus but that can't be connected with

Bhakthy as > > there is no> > > sanction from the Deity for the same and it is only the temple > > administration fixes the same.Years back in GVR udayasthamana pooja > > was fixed at Rs.5000> > > but now I don't know the amount but certainly it must be 50000 > > and what is the > > > guidelines for fixing such exhorbitant rates?The temple > > administration members enjoy in all comforts from the so called > > collections and that too everybody knows.Then how this collection > can > > be linked to ardent Bhakthy?Did the > > > Deity of GVR or Sabarimala told the administration to collect so > > much money?> > > So in the name of God all these are made.In a country like India > > with more than a billion people there is always the tendency to > > resort to superstitions in beliefs>

> > and the eagerness to know abt the future thru astrology.If there > > is something > > > wrong immediately it is decided to conduct an ashtamangalya > > prasna is conducted.The astrologers say that God is furious because > > the surroundings are polluted and the devotees are not havig proper > > devotion,roads are not good and all such things.When the same is > said > > by media and people nobody bothers and when the astrologers say > that > > God is angry immedately steps are taken to ward > > > off evils supposed to happen if the same are not done.Are they > > not looking funny?> > > > > > My intention is not to fnd fault with anything that is going on > > which everybody knows but the pertinent thing is that for a Bhaktha > > such things appear to be superfluous and when so many temples ae

> > suffering for lack of funs why certain important temples alone take > > the cakes when we accept that God is everywhere.There is no > > explanation for this anamoly and the same will continue.> > > So by doing vazhipadus and offerings the temple coffers can be > > filled up but not lead one to Real Bhakthy.Was there such a system > > during the days of Bhattathiri and Poonthanam?Because those days > they > > had so much love and > > > devotion to God and never bothered abt other things..Now the > > trend has changed and money takes the upper hand over Real > > Bhakthy.What a pity?> > > > > > If anybody is offended by these comments I express regret as I hv > > only stated what I felt and to enforce the fact that Bhakthy has > > nothing to do with the so > > > called offerings and the same

depends on individual choices and > > not on the > > > choice of people running temple administration.> > > > > > > > > Hare Krishna.> > > > > > > > > hba9331 <pravin9@> wrote:> > > Om Namo Narayanaya> > > A very good topic to discuss on this forum. Everybody should > > > earnestly participate...since there are bound to be various > > > questions coming up in our mind...one such question I have> > > > > > It was discussed in one of the Books of AMMA that Guruvayoor does > > > not need any of our material offerings in cash or kind, all those > > > goes to the funding account. But if the below concept is followed > > it > > > would be very difficult to maintain the temple and the > > > infrastructure needed and the

salary to be paid to various > > employee. > > > We in Kerala do not have the concept of KARSEVA as with the Sikh > > > community where free service is also an offering. The give and > take > > > concept if discouraged would have far reaching consequence on the > > > day to day working of such institution...I have my own doubts if > > the > > > Hindu system would work purely on the Bakthi concept. Currently > > when > > > some bad time falls on us, we run to Guruvayoorappan, same way as > a > > > child runs to his/her parents when they are in trouble or even > when > > > they have a bad dream...but since we are not kids we feel it > would > > > not be fair to go empty handed so promise Guruvayoorappan certain > > > Vazipadu....more over even the Vazipadus are

classified into do > > this > > > and you get this..do that and that for good health...etc..> > > > > > I shall be very thankful if these doubts are cleared by the good > > > members in our forum.> > > > > > Narayana Narayana.....> > > > > > Pravin> > > > > > guruvayur , "K.V Gopalakrishna" > > > <gopalakrishna.kv@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Mataji,> > > > Radhe Krishna!> > > > > > > > I agree with you one hundred per cent. With due regard to what > > > Shri > > > > Ganapathy Raman and Krishna Prasad have said, in some cases, it > > is > > > a > > > > fact that

complacency creeps in when one acquires the object he > > > has been > > > > longing for. This complacency makes him too jubilant, raising > > > his ego > > > > level so high, that he forgets for a time, that what he has > > > acquired is > > > > by divine grace also. I have deliberately added the word "also" > > > > because many people think that one's hard work was responsible > > for > > > his > > > > upliftment in life, or that it was the cleverness of the doctor > > > and the > > > > efficacy of the medicine that has cured him. I would like to > > > reiterate > > > > here that hard work is definitely required to be done if one > > wants > > > to > > > > come up in life. Similarly, the doctor's experience and the

> > > efficacy > > > > of the medicine play a very important part in curing the > > > disease. But > > > > all these require divine grace to have their effect. Without > > > that, no > > > > medicine will work, and any amount of hard work will not pay. > > > People > > > > have the habit of blaming God when something wrong happens > > without > > > > realising that the bad that has happened is result of one's own > > > Karma. > > > > Let us not forget that even to think of God, His grace is > > > required. > > > > "Iswaranugrahad eva bhakthirbhavathi Kesave!"> > > > > > > > Promising to perform a particular "vazhipadu" to God if He > > favours > > > etc., > > > > like performing a "Tulabharam" if one

gets cured of his ailment > > > etc., is > > > > an inferior type of Bhakti. On the face of the person's promise > > > and > > > > cure of the disease, it may look as though the person got cured > > > because > > > > of the promise made. But really speaking, it is not so. It is > > > the > > > > person's belief on one side and the fruits of Karma on the > other > > > cured > > > > him. The Lord will accept anything if offered with Bhakti. > > > But what > > > > He wants is Bhakti and Bhakti alone.> > > > > > > > Regards> > > > KVG.> > > > > > > > > > > > Saroja Ramanujam wrote:> > > > > > > > > Well said Gopalakrishnan!> > > > > I think

that perhaps it is relevant here to examine the > > > following > > > > > sloka from Gita.> > > > > > > > > > Chathurvidhaa bajanthe maamjanaah sukrthino arjuna> > > > > aatho jignaasurarthaartheejnaanee cha bharathrshbha> > > > > Krishna says,> > > > > 'Four types of devotees of noble deeds worship Me, Arjuna,the > > > seeker > > > > > after worldly possessions, the afflicted,the seeker for > > > knowledge and > > > > > the man of wisdom, O best of Bharathas A man who believes in > > God > > > prays > > > > > for the fulfilment of his cherished objects of the > world,wealth > > > or > > > > > child and so on. When he gets them as a result of his prayer > > his > > >

> > devotion is strengthened and develops into faith.If he has > not > > > already > > > > > acquired faith he will lose belief if his desire is not > > > fulfilled.This > > > > > is why we often hear the cry 'I no more believe in God,' from > > > those > > > > > who face disappointments in life.> > > > > Sugreeva and dhruva can be cited as examples of arthaarthee > > type > > > of > > > > > devotees, the former devoloped faith after the fulfilment of > > his > > > > > desire while Dhruva had both faith and beliefand became a > jnani > > > later, > > > > > elevated to the status of dhruva star.> > > > > The second kind of devotee who seeks God as his sole refuge > > when > > > in >

> > > > distress like Droupadi or Gajendra are aarthees with staunch > > > faith > > > > > that He alone is their saviour, which is termed as > > > mahavisvasam ,among > > > > > the five requisites of saranagathi. They do not seek Him for > > > worldly > > > > > pleasures but remain ardent devotees through out their life > > > which > > > > > alone will make them call out to Him in earnest.In normal > life > > > we do > > > > > not have that faith in God eventhough we have belief in Him > and > > > > > therefore we suffer in consequenceHere comes the importance > of > > > the > > > > > word 'sukrthinah' which Krishna uses to describe the four > kinds > > > of > > > > > devotees. To think

of God and yearn for His mercy requires > > > > > poorvajanmapunya. There is a story to illustrate this.> > > > > A man who was a confirmed sinner was sitting on a tree and > Lord > > > Siva > > > > > happened to pass that way with Parvathi. Siva told Parvathi > > that > > > the > > > > > man is going to fall from the tree and die since it is his > > fate. > > > > > Parvathi, being the divine mother, took pity on the man and > > said > > > that > > > > > they should save him to which Siva replied that it was his > > karma > > > being > > > > > a sinner to die such a death.When Parvathi remonstrated with > > him > > > Siva > > > > > said that He will save the man if he cries out 'appa' and she

> > > should > > > > > save him if he says 'amma' when he falls. Parvathi was happy > > > without > > > > > realising the real purport of Siva's words.The branch on > which > > > the man > > > > > was sitting broke and he fell down crying'aiyo,' because he > did > > > not > > > > > have the sukrthi to call God's name at the time of death> > > > > Jignasu is one who has pure devotion and does not seek the > > > pleasures > > > > > of life nor is he worried about distress because the only > thing > > > that > > > > > could cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava > > and > > > to > > > > > acertain extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of > > > Bhakthi. A

> > > > > jignasu who has pure devotion and does not seek the pleasures > > of > > > life > > > > > nor is he worried about distress because the only thing that > > > could > > > > > cause pain to him is being away from the Lord. Uddhava and to > > > acertain > > > > > extent Paikshit are the examples of this kind of Bhakthi. A > > > jignasu > > > > > loves the Lord for his own sake and seeks to acquire the > jnana > > > which > > > > > the Lord Himself gives as in the case of Udhdhava or through > > > someone > > > > > as He did for Parikshit.> > > > > > > > > > The last but not least is the jnani who has realised the > truth > > > about > > > > > the Lord

like Prahlada, Narada and other sages who were both > > > bhakthas > > > > > and jnanis.> > > > > > > > > > Besides, Ramanuja says in his sribhashya,> > > > > 'dhyAnam cha thailadhArAvath avicchinna smrthisanthAna > roopam,' > > > > > continous flow of remembrance like the stream of continously > > > dropping > > > > > oil. 'DhruvA smrthih ;smrthilambhe sarvagranTheenAm > > > > > vipramokshah,'(Chan.7-26-2) when the constant,dhruva, > > > remembrance, > > > > > smrthih is attained all knots are rent asunder. Thus > > > DHruvAsmrthi is > > > > > prescribed as the means of liberation> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Saroja Ramanujam> > > > >> > >

> > > > > > >> > > > > .> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > May god bless you,> > > > > > > > > > Dr. Saroja Ramanujam, M.A., Ph.D, Siromani in > > > sanskrit.> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > -------------------------> > > -------> > > > > > > > > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail Beta. > > > > > > > > > > > <http://us.rd./evt=40791/*http://advision.webevents..co> > > m/handraisers> >

> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new > > Click here> > > Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click > here> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new > Click here> > Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click here> >> > > > > > > > India Answers: Share what you know. Learn

something new Click here> Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click here>

India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new Click here

Catch all the FIFA World Cup 2006 action on India Click here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...