Guest guest Posted March 12, 2008 Report Share Posted March 12, 2008 Om Namo Narayanaya Nama, Dear all, That would be a good idea . I was also thinking about it. I do agree that we should talk about those kind of things as well. But when we discuss it here seriously , it seems we are slipping away from our actual intention. Manoj Kunniyur."PS, Vinod K (GE Infra, Energy)" <vinod.ps wrote: !! Sri Rama Jayam !! Dear Devotees, As stated by Shri Saseedharan & Shri Gopi, I repeat that the group in place is focussed only for Bhakti/spirituality related topics. The topic raised here has more of a religious flavour than spirituality. Yes, it is quite IMP to discuss such things as well. These kind of discussions have occurred on numerous occasion & most of them were left open with no outcome at the end. That is not what we want. Our group should not become a medium to discharge our negative emotions only. While raising such issues we must also keep in mind of solving it as well. If we believe that it is do-able, let's unite & attain what we want. Sunil ji - Can we create a daughter group & settle all such kinds of discussions there instead of driving it our main forum ? By doing this we will have a better control of our group activities. Wish to read others opinion !! Hare Krishna Hare Rama guruvayur [guruvayur ] On Behalf Of chirattapuramTuesday, March 11, 2008 4:13 AMguruvayur Subject: Re: [Guruvayur/Guruvayoor] sudhakaran the minister Our problem is not Sudhakran or Stalin or Mao 0r Namboodiripad. It is the lack of unity among Hindus.we should have a united front, not just in name only but an action minded organisation to fight injustice against Hindus. Have we ever thought why the communists do not interfere with the Christian churches or the muslims mosques? because those communities have a well organised system run by sincere, honest , dedicated persons. So long as we do not have such a set up, these vultures will feast on,and bilk the Guruvayoor, Shabarimala and other temple wealth. Kaattile maram , thevarude Ana, valiyeda, vali. How true!Jai Shree Krishna 1guruvayur , C.K.Narayanan <C.K.Narayanan wrote:>> Dear saseedharan,> > With due respect,> > We should feel free to discuss anything that effects "Guruvayur" be it> Sudhakaran or be it curruption in the Devasom board, as long as some decorum> is maintained.> > It is this attitude of "acceptance" that now they are discussing about> opening Sabrimala to all genders of all ages, etc. Never would they have had> the guts to do this to any other religious group.> > So my opinion is that lets keep the forum open for a decent info decimation.> > The rest is senior opinion....> > Regards> ck> > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:29 PM, saseedharan_vk <saseedharan_vk> wrote:> > > Dear members,> >> > should this Bhakti related forum be polluted by talking about the> > shenaningan of the devaswom minister Sudhakaran-we have come together> > to discuss bhakti for Guruvayurappan and let us restrict ourselves to> > our purpose without discussing politics.> > saseedharan> >> > > >> > > > -- > C.K.Narayanan> messenger: cknarayanan> MSN Messenger: cknarayanan Skype: cknarayanan> Google Talk: c.k.narayanan> Mobile: +65. 93899297> http://www.linkedin.com/in/cknarayanan> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Search. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2008 Report Share Posted March 12, 2008 just a few words, I do not wish to prolong this discussion. This forum is for expressing bhakti and related items about Guruvayoorappan. It is a Bhakta's duty and obligation to defend the sanctity of Guruvayoorappan and the temple. Any comments related to the defence of violations aginst the holy shrine is not religious matter but ones faith in the Lord. Jai Shree Krishna ! guruvayur , Manoj Kunniyur <kunniyur_manoj wrote: > > Om Namo Narayanaya Nama, > > Dear all, > > That would be a good idea . I was also thinking about it. I do agree that we should talk about those kind of things as well. But when we discuss it here seriously , it seems we are slipping away from our actual intention. > > Manoj Kunniyur. > > " PS, Vinod K (GE Infra, Energy) " <vinod.ps wrote: > !! Sri Rama Jayam !! > > Dear Devotees, > > As stated by Shri Saseedharan & Shri Gopi, I repeat that the group in place is focussed only for Bhakti/spirituality related topics. The topic raised here has more of a religious flavour than spirituality. Yes, it is quite IMP to discuss such things as well. > > These kind of discussions have occurred on numerous occasion & most of them were left open with no outcome at the end. That is not what we want. Our group should not become a medium to discharge our negative emotions only. While raising such issues we must also keep in mind of solving it as well. If we believe that it is do-able, let's unite & attain what we want. > > Sunil ji - Can we create a daughter group & settle all such kinds of discussions there instead of driving it our main forum ? By doing this we will have a better control of our group activities. > > Wish to read others opinion !! > > Hare Krishna > Hare Rama > > guruvayur [guruvayur ] On Behalf Of chirattapuram > Tuesday, March 11, 2008 4:13 AM > guruvayur > Re: [Guruvayur/Guruvayoor] sudhakaran the minister > > > > Our problem is not Sudhakran or Stalin or Mao 0r Namboodiripad. > It is the lack of unity among Hindus.we should have a united front, > not just in name only but an action minded organisation to fight > injustice against Hindus. > Have we ever thought why the communists do not interfere with the > Christian churches or the muslims mosques? because those communities > have a well organised system run by sincere, honest , dedicated > persons. > So long as we do not have such a set up, these vultures will feast on, > and bilk the Guruvayoor, Shabarimala and other temple wealth. > Kaattile maram , thevarude Ana, valiyeda, vali. How true! > > Jai Shree Krishna 1 > > guruvayur , C.K.Narayanan <C.K.Narayanan@> > wrote: > > > > Dear saseedharan, > > > > With due respect, > > > > We should feel free to discuss anything that effects " Guruvayur " be > it > > Sudhakaran or be it curruption in the Devasom board, as long as > some decorum > > is maintained. > > > > It is this attitude of " acceptance " that now they are discussing > about > > opening Sabrimala to all genders of all ages, etc. Never would they > have had > > the guts to do this to any other religious group. > > > > So my opinion is that lets keep the forum open for a decent info > decimation. > > > > The rest is senior opinion.... > > > > Regards > > ck > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:29 PM, saseedharan_vk <saseedharan_vk@> > > wrote: > > > > > Dear members, > > > > > > should this Bhakti related forum be polluted by talking about the > > > shenaningan of the devaswom minister Sudhakaran-we have come > together > > > to discuss bhakti for Guruvayurappan and let us restrict > ourselves to > > > our purpose without discussing politics. > > > saseedharan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > C.K.Narayanan > > messenger: cknarayanan > > MSN Messenger: cknarayanan@ > > Skype: cknarayanan > > Google Talk: c.k.narayanan > > Mobile: +65. 93899297 > > http://www.linkedin.com/in/cknarayanan > > > > > Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Search. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.