Guest guest Posted July 2, 2008 Report Share Posted July 2, 2008 Hello all,Hare Krishna !I too am a vegetarian. Can we all join Mr Manoj's path and take it as a dedication towards Lord ? At least that many animals will not be killed for we the group people for which I am sure, Lord will be pleased ! best regards2008/7/1 Manoj Kunniyur <kunniyurmanoj: Om Namo Narayanaya Respected Guruvayur family members, As Savitriji and Panickerji say , let we all Guruvayurappa devotees be vegetarians. Proud to say that i became vegetarian after my membership in our group. I stopped having non veg food to show my grattitude to Bhagavan for His kind blessings. When i decided to be vegetarian everybody told me to think twice as already i was so slim when i was at home last time. They concerned that i may lack protins. But i had prayed Bhagavan and strongly decided to continue...believe it or not now my weight is inceased than earlier and i feel more healthy. I think people afraid of lacking protins while being vegetarians. It is not true. Having right vegetables and nuts give more protins than non veg. The other reason can be the unwillingness to quit the non veg taste. If we have some personal experiences where Bhagavan saved us why we should not sacrifies something for Bhagavan? " Lokame tharavad thanikkee chidikalum pulkalum puzhukkalum koodithan kudumbakkar " Hare Guruvayurappa!!! Manoj Kunniyur. --- On Fri, 6/27/08, Savitri Puram <savitriopuram wrote: Savitri Puram <savitriopuramRe: [Guruvayur] Namasthe- Sita and parrots guruvayur Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 11:58 PM Dear and respected Gopalkrishnaji, Since it was a sukhaparyavasaayi , it was really nice to read your real life story. The connection is amazing. I can imagine what all of you would have gone through when his whereabouts were unknown. I remember a story of a Nambudiri who destroyed several snake hills (pampu puttu) to cultivate something exotic. In that process, I think several snakes were killed. It seems his mother advised him not to destroy them like that. After a few months he was bitten by an extremely poisonous snake and he died before he could get any help. I was about 13 years when this happened. I still remember everybody talking about the curse of the snake. As small children we used to make paper boats, put small ants in the boat and let it flow in the rain water flowing down the steps or slopes. Whenever amma sees this she used to tell how sad the mother ant will feel if they were separated and something happens to either of them and told us not to do that. When things happen in the same life, and if we remember what paapam we did, we can try to connect. But when we get the results from past birth, we are unable to connect or do pariharam. Only thing karaneeyam or doable for us is to cause the least harm to the gross and subtle body of all creatures and even to plants and inanimate things. Once poet Vishnunarayanan Nambudiri told " Hinduism believes in living in harmony with he whole creation. We do not believe that God made everything on earth for us to use and enjoy life. That is one reason of recommending to be a vegetarian. Even killing plants is not desirable. But we stick to the principle of doing the least harm possible for our survival. This is how Hinduism is conceptually different from other religions. " Regards and prayers Savitri On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:51 AM, K.V Gopalakrishna <gopalakrishna. kv (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: Dear all,Radhe Krishna!Beautiful story from Padma Puranam which Savitriji has told us. I shall tell you my personal experience.Although my father was a Sanskrit scholar and written the commentary of Narayaneeyam and many other stotras, it so happened that when we were living in Mavelikara, somebody brought a cage containing two parrots and presented to my father, and he took it. We as children were very fond of the parrots, and my father trained them to talk, etc., and they used to come out of the cage and sit on his hand, etc. They were so tamed. One day, one of the parrots escaped and flew away and only the other remained in the cage. My elder sister was married at the age of twelve in 1938. My B-i-l was living in Burmah at that time. After the marriage, my sister was not sent along with her husband as she had not attained puberty. When she attained puberty at the age of 14, my b-i-l came from Burmah and she was sent along with him to Burmah. And they were having a happy life, with the other members of the family also present in Burmah. In 1942, when the Japanese occupied Burmah, all women and children were asked to evacuate Burmah. My sister was one who came along with the others, and stayed with us. All the other members of the family were also allowed to go and they all came back, except my b-i-l who was threatened by the Burmah Corporation with whom he was working, with severe punishment if he attempted to go. He was stuck there in Burmah till 1945, facing the perils of war, and all atrocities the Japanese committed, somehow escaping death every day. His whereabouts were not known for nearly 4 years. We, especially my sister were so anxious and we could not do anything else other than to pray for my b-i-l's safety. My father immediately released the other parrot also.By end of 1945, we got one letter from him that he was safe, and he came back by beginning of 1946.My father realised that all these happened because we had kept the parrot in captivity. Ever since, we learned a lesson that we should never keep birds, animals, etc., in captivity. RegardsKVG. Savitri Puram wrote: Dear all, This is a story from Padma puranam. Heroine is our little Sita Devi of Mithila. She was about seven years old and was playing with her friends in her beautiful garden. Then two green parrots came there and started singing beautifully. It was not chirping of parrots, but they were singing Ramayana story as if somebody had taught them. They sang that part of the story where Rama came to Mithila and married Sita by breaking Siva's bow. Songs of the parrots were very clear and sweet. Sita fell in love with those parrots and asked where they learnt this song and who was this Rama and Sita. They said they learnt it from Valmiki Maharshi himself because they stayed in the same forest. Then they explained that Sita is the little girl in front of them asking questions and charming Prince Rama would come one day to marry her. Sita requested them to stay back so that she could listen to them everyday. Then the female parrot told Sita that she was pregnant and she would like to go back to her own forest and would come back after she delivered the children. But Sita could not resist the temptation of owning her and enjoying her sweet music and did not allow her to go. Female parrot was captured and was put in a beautiful cage. Sita told the female parrot: " I shall release you when that charming Rama you described come and marry me " . Male parrot also begged Sita to free his wife, but Sita told him to come back later. This parrot who was pregnant was very sad to be separated from her beloved husband. She refused to eat and cried and cursed Sita, " Since you separated me from my beloved husband during pregnancy, you also will have to experience the same fate " . Having spoken thus the miserable female parrot uttered Rama naamam and died. Seeing this the male parrot was extremely sad and distressed and fell in to the Ganga and drowned himself. His last words were : " You killed my beautiful pregnant wife by separating her from me. I will take janma in Ayodhya and will cause your separation from your husband during your pregnancy " . Later Rama married Sita. Ravana kidnapped her and Rama defeated Ravana and brought her back to Ayodhya. This male parrot was born as Krodhan, the washerman in Ayodhya and because of his harsh words Sita was exiled to the forest. Sita was pregnant at that time and she had to face separation from her husband living alone in the forest. Padma purana says that everybody has to experience the results of each and every karma we do. Either the results will be experienced in the same janma or in the subsequent janmaas. Rama and Sita being Purusha and Prakrithi, acted as if they were going through the suffering to show us that karmaphalam will always follow karmam. This story tells us to be considerate to other fellow creatures' feelings and pain. According to Njaanaananda Saraswathi Sukritham and Dushkritham are like bouncing balls. If we throw the ball of sukrutham, only the ball of sukrutham will bounce back. If we throw ball of Dushkrutham, only ball of dushkrutham will bounce back. But what about the balls of dushkruthum that we threw in the previous janmaas? We do not know how many balls we played with. Scriptures say, sankeerthanam and satsangam will change the direction of the ball of dushkrutham or at least lessen the force with which it will bounce back on us. Regards and prayers savitri -- Best regardsJayasree MenonBangalore+9900149461--A well-thought out plan, execution excellence, market timing, personal leadership are drivers of the growth trajectory. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 Dear friends,It really makes me happy to see that I became one of the reason for Mr Manoj to become vegetarian. Few times I was feeling that I should write some thing on vegetarianism. But restrained myself as it may be out of subject for the group. If people are interested I can post some information on the subject now and then, only if it is OK with the owner of the group. I don't like to offend any one.Thanks.Jayasree Menon <euroanuster wrote: Hello all,Hare Krishna !I too am a vegetarian. Can we all join Mr Manoj's path and take it as a dedication towards Lord ? At least that many animals will not be killed for we the group people for which I am sure, Lord will be pleased ! best regards2008/7/1 Manoj Kunniyur <kunniyurmanoj >: Om Namo Narayanaya Respected Guruvayur family members, As Savitriji and Panickerji say , let we all Guruvayurappa devotees be vegetarians. Proud to say that i became vegetarian after my membership in our group. I stopped having non veg food to show my grattitude to Bhagavan for His kind blessings. When i decided to be vegetarian everybody told me to think twice as already i was so slim when i was at home last time. They concerned that i may lack protins. But i had prayed Bhagavan and strongly decided to continue...believe it or not now my weight is inceased than earlier and i feel more healthy. I think people afraid of lacking protins while being vegetarians. It is not true. Having right vegetables and nuts give more protins than non veg. The other reason can be the unwillingness to quit the non veg taste. If we have some personal experiences where Bhagavan saved us why we should not sacrifies something for Bhagavan? "Lokame tharavad thanikkee chidikalum pulkalum puzhukkalum koodithan kudumbakkar" Hare Guruvayurappa!!! Manoj Kunniyur. --- On Fri, 6/27/08, Savitri Puram <savitriopuram > wrote: Savitri Puram <savitriopuram >Re: [Guruvayur] Namasthe- Sita and parrots guruvayur Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 11:58 PM Dear and respected Gopalkrishnaji, Since it was a sukhaparyavasaayi , it was really nice to read your real life story. The connection is amazing. I can imagine what all of you would have gone through when his whereabouts were unknown. I remember a story of a Nambudiri who destroyed several snake hills (pampu puttu) to cultivate something exotic. In that process, I think several snakes were killed. It seems his mother advised him not to destroy them like that. After a few months he was bitten by an extremely poisonous snake and he died before he could get any help. I was about 13 years when this happened. I still remember everybody talking about the curse of the snake. As small children we used to make paper boats, put small ants in the boat and let it flow in the rain water flowing down the steps or slopes. Whenever amma sees this she used to tell how sad the mother ant will feel if they were separated and something happens to either of them and told us not to do that. When things happen in the same life, and if we remember what paapam we did, we can try to connect. But when we get the results from past birth, we are unable to connect or do pariharam. Only thing karaneeyam or doable for us is to cause the least harm to the gross and subtle body of all creatures and even to plants and inanimate things. Once poet Vishnunarayanan Nambudiri told" Hinduism believes in living in harmony with he whole creation. We do not believe that God made everything on earth for us to use and enjoy life. That is one reason of recommending to be a vegetarian. Even killing plants is not desirable. But we stick to the principle of doing the least harm possible for our survival. This is how Hinduism is conceptually different from other religions." Regards and prayers Savitri On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:51 AM, K.V Gopalakrishna <gopalakrishna. kv (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: Dear all,Radhe Krishna!Beautiful story from Padma Puranam which Savitriji has told us. I shall tell you my personal experience.Although my father was a Sanskrit scholar and written the commentary of Narayaneeyam and many other stotras, it so happened that when we were living in Mavelikara, somebody brought a cage containing two parrots and presented to my father, and he took it. We as children were very fond of the parrots, and my father trained them to talk, etc., and they used to come out of the cage and sit on his hand, etc. They were so tamed. One day, one of the parrots escaped and flew away and only the other remained in the cage. My elder sister was married at the age of twelve in 1938. My B-i-l was living in Burmah at that time. After the marriage, my sister was not sent along with her husband as she had not attained puberty. When she attained puberty at the age of 14, my b-i-l came from Burmah and she was sent along with him to Burmah. And they were having a happy life, with the other members of the family also present in Burmah. In 1942, when the Japanese occupied Burmah, all women and children were asked to evacuate Burmah. My sister was one who came along with the others, and stayed with us. All the other members of the family were also allowed to go and they all came back, except my b-i-l who was threatened by the Burmah Corporation with whom he was working, with severe punishment if he attempted to go. He was stuck there in Burmah till 1945, facing the perils of war, and all atrocities the Japanese committed, somehow escaping death every day. His whereabouts were not known for nearly 4 years. We, especially my sister were so anxious and we could not do anything else other than to pray for my b-i-l's safety. My father immediately released the other parrot also.By end of 1945, we got one letter from him that he was safe, and he came back by beginning of 1946.My father realised that all these happened because we had kept the parrot in captivity. Ever since, we learned a lesson that we should never keep birds, animals, etc., in captivity. RegardsKVG. Savitri Puram wrote: Dear all, This is a story from Padma puranam. Heroine is our little Sita Devi of Mithila. She was about seven years old and was playing with her friends in her beautiful garden. Then two green parrots came there and started singing beautifully. It was not chirping of parrots, but they were singing Ramayana story as if somebody had taught them. They sang that part of the story where Rama came to Mithila and married Sita by breaking Siva's bow. Songs of the parrots were very clear and sweet. Sita fell in love with those parrots and asked where they learnt this song and who was this Rama and Sita. They said they learnt it from Valmiki Maharshi himself because they stayed in the same forest. Then they explained that Sita is the little girl in front of them asking questions and charming Prince Rama would come one day to marry her. Sita requested them to stay back so that she could listen to them everyday. Then the female parrot told Sita that she was pregnant and she would like to go back to her own forest and would come back after she delivered the children. But Sita could not resist the temptation of owning her and enjoying her sweet music and did not allow her to go. Female parrot was captured and was put in a beautiful cage. Sita told the female parrot: " I shall release you when that charming Rama you described come and marry me". Male parrot also begged Sita to free his wife, but Sita told him to come back later. This parrot who was pregnant was very sad to be separated from her beloved husband. She refused to eat and cried and cursed Sita, "Since you separated me from my beloved husband during pregnancy, you also will have to experience the same fate" . Having spoken thus the miserable female parrot uttered Rama naamam and died. Seeing this the male parrot was extremely sad and distressed and fell in to the Ganga and drowned himself. His last words were : "You killed my beautiful pregnant wife by separating her from me. I will take janma in Ayodhya and will cause your separation from your husband during your pregnancy". Later Rama married Sita. Ravana kidnapped her and Rama defeated Ravana and brought her back to Ayodhya. This male parrot was born as Krodhan, the washerman in Ayodhya and because of his harsh words Sita was exiled to the forest. Sita was pregnant at that time and she had to face separation from her husband living alone in the forest. Padma purana says that everybody has to experience the results of each and every karma we do. Either the results will be experienced in the same janma or in the subsequent janmaas. Rama and Sita being Purusha and Prakrithi, acted as if they were going through the suffering to show us that karmaphalam will always follow karmam. This story tells us to be considerate to other fellow creatures' feelings and pain. According to Njaanaananda Saraswathi Sukritham and Dushkritham are like bouncing balls. If we throw the ball of sukrutham, only the ball of sukrutham will bounce back. If we throw ball of Dushkrutham, only ball of dushkrutham will bounce back. But what about the balls of dushkruthum that we threw in the previous janmaas? We do not know how many balls we played with. Scriptures say, sankeerthanam and satsangam will change the direction of the ball of dushkrutham or at least lessen the force with which it will bounce back on us. Regards and prayers savitri -- Best regardsJayasree MenonBangalore+9900149461--A well-thought out plan, execution excellence, market timing, personal leadership are drivers of the growth trajectory. Sincerely,Udayabhanu Panickaraum namahh ShivaayaOUR BODY IS THE ABODE OF THE JEEVATMAN, WHICH IS IN FACT THE PARABRAHMAN. LET US NOT MAKE IT A GRAVEYARD. LET US NOT EAT FLESH. LET US BE VEGETARIANS AND STAY HEALTHY. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 3, 2008 Report Share Posted July 3, 2008 Dear Devotees, Vegetarianism is vital for improving the Devotee's Spiritual Discipline . The food has a decisive influence on one's mental well being as well . Man is a natural vegetarian . The unnatural food (Meat) prompts animal instincts such as lust for materailistic pleasures .By becoming a Vegetarian , one does a great help to himself and the world . It is not only service to Lord Krishna but a great achievement for the Devotee himself . Of course, Bhaktavalsala is happy when His devotee makes such a remarkable spiritual improvement . The beauty of Krishna's philosophy is that it's regulations benefit both faithful follower and the environment . Hare Krishna !!! Dasan guruvayur , " Vinayaraj V R " <vinayarajvr wrote: > > Killing animals for eating is a very very unholly thing. We > all who believe in Lord Krishna should be pure vegetarians irrespect > of our caste or creed. Let us be true Vaishnavas. I see everyday cows > are being transported in lorries and by road to be killed. I see > tears in their eyes. They are beaten heavily if they pause a bit on > the road. I can not believe they will be killed to be eaten. > > One who believes in Lord Krishna truly can never eat meat. Let us use > this group and every available occassion to spread the message of > vegetarianism. > > regards > > > guruvayur , Manoj Kunniyur <kunniyurmanoj@> > wrote: > > > > Om Namo Narayanaya > > > > Respected Guruvayur family members, > > > > As Savitriji and Panickerji say , let > we all Guruvayurappa devotees be vegetarians. Proud to say that i > became vegetarian after my membership in our group. I stopped having > non veg food to show my grattitude to Bhagavan for His kind > blessings. > > > > When i decided to be vegetarian everybody told me to > think twice as already i was so slim when i was at home last time. > They concerned that i may lack protins. But i had prayed Bhagavan and > strongly decided to continue...believe it or not now my weight is > inceased than earlier and i feel more healthy. > > > > I think people afraid of lacking protins while being > vegetarians. It is not true. Having right vegetables and nuts give > more protins than non veg. The other reason can be the unwillingness > to quit the non veg taste. If we have some personal experiences where > Bhagavan saved us why we should not sacrifies something > for Bhagavan? > > > > " Lokame tharavad thanikkee chidikalum > > pulkalum puzhukkalum koodithan kudumbakkar " > > > > > > Hare Guruvayurappa!!! > > > > > > Manoj Kunniyur. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 6/27/08, Savitri Puram <savitriopuram@> wrote: > > > > Savitri Puram <savitriopuram@> > > Re: [Guruvayur] Namasthe- Sita and parrots > > guruvayur > > Friday, June 27, 2008, 11:58 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear and respected Gopalkrishnaji, > > > > Since it was a sukhaparyavasaayi , it was really nice to read your > real life story. The connection is amazing. I can imagine what all of > you would have gone through when his whereabouts were unknown. > > > > I remember a story of a Nambudiri who destroyed several snake hills > (pampu puttu) to cultivate something exotic. In that process, I think > several snakes were killed. It seems his mother advised him not to > destroy them like that. After a few months he was bitten by an > extremely poisonous snake and he died before he could get any help. I > was about 13 years when this happened. I still remember everybody > talking about the curse of the snake. > > > > As small children we used to make paper boats, put small ants in > the boat and let it flow in the rain water flowing down the steps or > slopes. Whenever amma sees this she used to tell how sad the mother > ant will feel if they were separated and something happens to either > of them and told us not to do that. > > > > When things happen in the same life, and if we remember what paapam > we did, we can try to connect. But when we get the results from past > birth, we are unable to connect or do pariharam. Only thing > karaneeyam or doable for us is to cause the least harm to the > gross and subtle body of all creatures and even to plants and > inanimate things. Once poet Vishnunarayanan Nambudiri told " Hinduism > believes in living in harmony with he whole creation. We do not > believe that God made everything on earth for us to use and enjoy > life. That is one reason of recommending to be a vegetarian. Even > killing plants is not desirable. But we stick to the principle of > doing the least harm possible for our survival. This is how Hinduism > is conceptually different from other religions. " > > > > Regards and prayers > > > > Savitri > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:51 AM, K.V Gopalakrishna <gopalakrishna. > kv (AT) gmail (DOT) . com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear all, > > Radhe Krishna! > > Beautiful story from Padma Puranam which Savitriji has told us. I > shall tell you my personal experience. > > > > Although my father was a Sanskrit scholar and written the > commentary of Narayaneeyam and many other stotras, it so happened > that when we were living in Mavelikara, somebody brought a cage > containing two parrots and presented to my father, and he took it. > We as children were very fond of the parrots, and my father trained > them to talk, etc., and they used to come out of the cage and sit on > his hand, etc. They were so tamed. One day, one of the parrots > escaped and flew away and only the other remained in the cage. > > > > My elder sister was married at the age of twelve in 1938. My B- i-l > was living in Burmah at that time. After the marriage, my sister > was not sent along with her husband as she had not attained > puberty. When she attained puberty at the age of 14, my b-i-l came > from Burmah and she was sent along with him to Burmah. And they > were having a happy life, with the other members of the family also > present in Burmah. > > > > In 1942, when the Japanese occupied Burmah, all women and children > were asked to evacuate Burmah. My sister was one who came along with > the others, and stayed with us. All the other members of the family > were also allowed to go and they all came back, except my b-i-l who > was threatened by the Burmah Corporation with whom he was working, > with severe punishment if he attempted to go. He was stuck there in > Burmah till 1945, facing the perils of war, and all atrocities the > Japanese committed, somehow escaping death every day. His > whereabouts were not known for nearly 4 years. We, especially my > sister were so anxious and we could not do anything else other than > to pray for my b-i-l's safety. My father immediately released the > other parrot also. > > > > By end of 1945, we got one letter from him that he was safe, and he > came back by beginning of 1946. > > > > My father realised that all these happened because we had kept the > parrot in captivity. Ever since, we learned a lesson that we should > never keep birds, animals, etc., in captivity. > > > > Regards > > KVG. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Savitri Puram wrote: > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > This is a story from Padma puranam. Heroine is our little Sita Devi > of Mithila. She was about seven years old and was playing with her > friends in her beautiful garden. Then two green parrots came there > and started singing beautifully. It was not chirping of parrots, but > they were singing Ramayana story as if somebody had taught them. They > sang that part of the story where Rama came to Mithila and married > Sita by breaking Siva's bow. Songs of the parrots were very clear and > sweet. Sita fell in love with those parrots and asked where they > learnt this song and who was this Rama and Sita. They said they > learnt it from Valmiki Maharshi himself because they stayed in the > same forest. Then they explained that Sita is the little girl in > front of them asking questions and charming Prince Rama would come > one day to marry her. > > > > Sita requested them to stay back so that she could listen to them > everyday. Then the female parrot told Sita that she was pregnant and > she would like to go back to her own forest and would come back after > she delivered the children. But Sita could not resist the temptation > of owning her and enjoying her sweet music and did not allow her to > go. Female parrot was captured and was put in a beautiful cage. Sita > told the female parrot: " I shall release you when that charming Rama > you described come and marry me " . > > > > Male parrot also begged Sita to free his wife, but Sita told him > to come back later. This parrot who was pregnant was very sad to be > separated from her beloved husband. She refused to eat and cried > and cursed Sita, " Since you separated me from my beloved husband > during pregnancy, you also will have to experience the same fate " . > > > > Having spoken thus the miserable female parrot uttered Rama naamam > and died.. Seeing this the male parrot was extremely sad and > distressed and fell in to the Ganga and drowned himself. His last > words were : " You killed my beautiful pregnant wife by separating her > from me. I will take janma in Ayodhya and will cause your > separation from your husband during your pregnancy " . > > > > Later Rama married Sita. Ravana kidnapped her and Rama defeated > Ravana and brought her back to Ayodhya. This male parrot was born as > Krodhan, the washerman in Ayodhya and because of his harsh words > Sita was exiled to the forest. Sita was pregnant at that time and she > had to face separation from her husband living alone in the forest. > Padma purana says that everybody has to experience the results of > each and every karma we do. Either the results will be experienced in > the same janma or in the subsequent janmaas. > > > > Rama and Sita being Purusha and Prakrithi, acted as if they were > going through the suffering to show us that karmaphalam will always > follow karmam. This story tells us to be considerate to other fellow > creatures' feelings and pain. > > > > According to Njaanaananda Saraswathi Sukritham and Dushkritham are > like bouncing balls. If we throw the ball of sukrutham, only the ball > of sukrutham will bounce back. If we throw ball of Dushkrutham, only > ball of dushkrutham will bounce back. But what about the balls of > dushkruthum that we threw in the previous janmaas? We do not know how > many balls we played with. Scriptures say, sankeerthanam and > satsangam will change the direction of the ball of dushkrutham or at > least lessen the force with which it will bounce back on us. > > > > Regards and prayers > > > > savitri > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 Dear Friends,Here is an article on vegetarian food. Hope it is OK with the moderators.Thanks. Dr. Colin Campbell: Plant-Based Diet Is Key To Healthy Living by RunTex Staff, 5/19/2005 Dr. Colin Campbell: Plant-Based Diet Is Key To Healthy Living By Wish Dr. T. Colin Campbell, author of The China Study, presented a compelling (and at times, chilling) argument Wednesday night that a plant-based diet can virtually wipe out most of the common diseases and health risks that afflict millions of Americans every year. As the second guest in the RunTex Speaker Series, Campbell spoke before a packed house of runners, vegans and a handful of skeptics at RunTex. Campbell was introduced to the RunTex crowd by local triathlete Rip Esselstyn whose father-Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn Jr.-was the first speaker in the series who also espoused the key to healthy living is a plant-based diet. In that respect, Campbell didn't differ from Esselstyn whom he called "a kindred spirit." Both men are nutritional researchers who have studied the dietary and nutritional customs of cultures all over the world. Their studies and others have concluded, according to Campbell, "That all favor a plant-based diet for minimal disease risk. While Esselstyn's primary interest is the positive effects of a plant-based diet on artery and heart disease, Campbell's presentation-It's Time to Take Our Food Choices Seriously-was more geared to making healthier choices (i.e., plant-based foods) for improved performance. He said how a vegan diet not only does not reduce strength, but cited two prominent studies that showed how it improves strength significantly. He mentioned such well-known vegan performance athletes as Ironman Dave Scott, two-time Olympic marathon Pete Pfitzinger and tennis star Martina Navratilova who all had exceptionally long athletic careers which, Campbell said, was due in part to their vegan diet Like Esselstyn, Campbell was raised on a farm and "went to college as a meat and potatoes guy to learn how to grow cattle. I was happy to believe that the American diet was the best in the world." But what he found was much different. In the 1950s, Campbell was part of a team of researchers who went to the Philippines to study ways to introduce more protein into the diet of malnourished children. He was initially confused why so many Filipino children were being diagnosed with liver cancer, primarily an adult disease. What he found was that the children from the more affluent families who had the most protein in their diet also had the highest incidence of liver cancer. The poorer children who had less protein had the lowest incidence of liver cancer. Campbell, who is a professor emeritus of nutritional biochemistry at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, delved deeper into the relationship between high protein diets and diseases. He presented two remarkable animal studies last night. One of the studies was done on two control groups of rats. The first group was fed a diet which was comprised of 20 percent protein. The other group was fed a diet of only five percent protein. In the first group, every one of the 30 rats developed tumors and cancers. There were none in the second group. In another two-year study of two animal groups, one was fed a diet of 20 percent protein (in this case, casein which is an experimental protein that is 87 percent cows' milk). The other group was fed a diet of five percent soy and wheat protein. After two years, all the animals on the protein-rich diet were dead. There were no casualties in the other group. Campbell's conclusion? "Cancer is a diet and lifestyle decision," he told the crowd at RunTex. "It is not a genetic event. Family history and genes do not matter." Essentially, that's what Campbell's landmark, 20-year China Study also demonstrated. He and his team of researchers studied and collected data from adults in villages all over China. After analyzing the results, Campbell summarized: "People who ate the most animal-based foods got the most chronic disease. People who favored a plant-based diet were the healthiest and avoided disease." In contrast, Campbell showed that American women are five times more likely to get breast cancer and reach menopause four years earlier than Chinese women. American men are certainly not immune. Twelve of 14 studies showed a positive association between consumption of dairy products and prostate cancer, Campbell said. "There is little question," said Campbell, "that a plant-based diet has a broad-based effect that will prevent typical American diseases such as acne, depression, Alzheimer's, kidney stones, multiple sclerosis and heart disease." Campbell then wondered aloud why, if the negative impact of too much protein in the diet and the benefits of a plant-based diet are true, we haven't heard more about it. The reason, Campbell made clear, is the food industry and its powerful lobbying efforts as well as the government's irresponsible research which is often funded by the food industry. As evidence, Campbell showed the recommendations by the Food and Nutrition Board that "to meet the body's daily nutritional needs while minimizing risk for disease, adults should consume 10-35 percent of their diet from protein." Not! It should be less than 10 percent, says Campbell. Another study, sponsored by such groups as M & Ms, the Dannon Yogurt Board and the soft drink industry, recommended that added sugars-soft and fruit drinks, pastries and candy-should comprise no more than 25 percent of total calorie consumption when it should be miniscule. Clearly the blame, Campbell said, lies with the funding of such studies and the wide dissemination which he also blames on researchers who have been bought off by the food industry. Campbell concluded his talk by admonishing the audience, "It's time we stop thinking of health coming from a pill and start thinking of health as coming from food." Indeed. FROM: http://www.runtex.com/web/1-189.asp Manoj Kunniyur <kunniyurmanoj wrote: Om Namo Narayanaya Respected Guruvayur family members, As Savitriji and Panickerji say , let we all Guruvayurappa devotees be vegetarians. Proud to say that i became vegetarian after my membership in our group. I stopped having non veg food to show my grattitude to Bhagavan for His kind blessings. When i decided to be vegetarian everybody told me to think twice as already i was so slim when i was at home last time. They concerned that i may lack protins. But i had prayed Bhagavan and strongly decided to continue...believe it or not now my weight is inceased than earlier and i feel more healthy. I think people afraid of lacking protins while being vegetarians. It is not true. Having right vegetables and nuts give more protins than non veg. The other reason can be the unwillingness to quit the non veg taste. If we have some personal experiences where Bhagavan saved us why we should not sacrifies something for Bhagavan? "Lokame tharavad thanikkee chidikalum pulkalum puzhukkalum koodithan kudumbakkar" Hare Guruvayurappa!!! Manoj Kunniyur. --- On Fri, 6/27/08, Savitri Puram <savitriopuram > wrote: Savitri Puram <savitriopuram >Re: [Guruvayur] Namasthe- Sita and parrotsguruvayur Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 11:58 PM Dear and respected Gopalkrishnaji, Since it was a sukhaparyavasaayi , it was really nice to read your real life story. The connection is amazing. I can imagine what all of you would have gone through when his whereabouts were unknown. I remember a story of a Nambudiri who destroyed several snake hills (pampu puttu) to cultivate something exotic. In that process, I think several snakes were killed. It seems his mother advised him not to destroy them like that. After a few months he was bitten by an extremely poisonous snake and he died before he could get any help. I was about 13 years when this happened. I still remember everybody talking about the curse of the snake. As small children we used to make paper boats, put small ants in the boat and let it flow in the rain water flowing down the steps or slopes. Whenever amma sees this she used to tell how sad the mother ant will feel if they were separated and something happens to either of them and told us not to do that. When things happen in the same life, and if we remember what paapam we did, we can try to connect. But when we get the results from past birth, we are unable to connect or do pariharam. Only thing karaneeyam or doable for us is to cause the least harm to the gross and subtle body of all creatures and even to plants and inanimate things. Once poet Vishnunarayanan Nambudiri told" Hinduism believes in living in harmony with he whole creation. We do not believe that God made everything on earth for us to use and enjoy life. That is one reason of recommending to be a vegetarian. Even killing plants is not desirable. But we stick to the principle of doing the least harm possible for our survival. This is how Hinduism is conceptually different from other religions." Regards and prayers Savitri On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:51 AM, K.V Gopalakrishna <gopalakrishna. kv (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: Dear all,Radhe Krishna!Beautiful story from Padma Puranam which Savitriji has told us. I shall tell you my personal experience.Although my father was a Sanskrit scholar and written the commentary of Narayaneeyam and many other stotras, it so happened that when we were living in Mavelikara, somebody brought a cage containing two parrots and presented to my father, and he took it. We as children were very fond of the parrots, and my father trained them to talk, etc., and they used to come out of the cage and sit on his hand, etc. They were so tamed. One day, one of the parrots escaped and flew away and only the other remained in the cage.My elder sister was married at the age of twelve in 1938. My B-i-l was living in Burmah at that time. After the marriage, my sister was not sent along with her husband as she had not attained puberty. When she attained puberty at the age of 14, my b-i-l came from Burmah and she was sent along with him to Burmah. And they were having a happy life, with the other members of the family also present in Burmah. In 1942, when the Japanese occupied Burmah, all women and children were asked to evacuate Burmah. My sister was one who came along with the others, and stayed with us. All the other members of the family were also allowed to go and they all came back, except my b-i-l who was threatened by the Burmah Corporation with whom he was working, with severe punishment if he attempted to go. He was stuck there in Burmah till 1945, facing the perils of war, and all atrocities the Japanese committed, somehow escaping death every day. His whereabouts were not known for nearly 4 years. We, especially my sister were so anxious and we could not do anything else other than to pray for my b-i-l's safety. My father immediately released the other parrot also.By end of 1945, we got one letter from him that he was safe, and he came back by beginning of 1946.My father realised that all these happened because we had kept the parrot in captivity. Ever since, we learned a lesson that we should never keep birds, animals, etc., in captivity.RegardsKVG. Savitri Puram wrote: Dear all, This is a story from Padma puranam. Heroine is our little Sita Devi of Mithila. She was about seven years old and was playing with her friends in her beautiful garden. Then two green parrots came there and started singing beautifully. It was not chirping of parrots, but they were singing Ramayana story as if somebody had taught them. They sang that part of the story where Rama came to Mithila and married Sita by breaking Siva's bow. Songs of the parrots were very clear and sweet. Sita fell in love with those parrots and asked where they learnt this song and who was this Rama and Sita. They said they learnt it from Valmiki Maharshi himself because they stayed in the same forest. Then they explained that Sita is the little girl in front of them asking questions and charming Prince Rama would come one day to marry her. Sita requested them to stay back so that she could listen to them everyday. Then the female parrot told Sita that she was pregnant and she would like to go back to her own forest and would come back after she delivered the children. But Sita could not resist the temptation of owning her and enjoying her sweet music and did not allow her to go. Female parrot was captured and was put in a beautiful cage. Sita told the female parrot: " I shall release you when that charming Rama you described come and marry me". Male parrot also begged Sita to free his wife, but Sita told him to come back later. This parrot who was pregnant was very sad to be separated from her beloved husband. She refused to eat and cried and cursed Sita, "Since you separated me from my beloved husband during pregnancy, you also will have to experience the same fate" . Having spoken thus the miserable female parrot uttered Rama naamam and died. Seeing this the male parrot was extremely sad and distressed and fell in to the Ganga and drowned himself. His last words were : "You killed my beautiful pregnant wife by separating her from me. I will take janma in Ayodhya and will cause your separation from your husband during your pregnancy". Later Rama married Sita. Ravana kidnapped her and Rama defeated Ravana and brought her back to Ayodhya. This male parrot was born as Krodhan, the washerman in Ayodhya and because of his harsh words Sita was exiled to the forest. Sita was pregnant at that time and she had to face separation from her husband living alone in the forest. Padma purana says that everybody has to experience the results of each and every karma we do. Either the results will be experienced in the same janma or in the subsequent janmaas. Rama and Sita being Purusha and Prakrithi, acted as if they were going through the suffering to show us that karmaphalam will always follow karmam. This story tells us to be considerate to other fellow creatures' feelings and pain. According to Njaanaananda Saraswathi Sukritham and Dushkritham are like bouncing balls. If we throw the ball of sukrutham, only the ball of sukrutham will bounce back. If we throw ball of Dushkrutham, only ball of dushkrutham will bounce back. But what about the balls of dushkruthum that we threw in the previous janmaas? We do not know how many balls we played with. Scriptures say, sankeerthanam and satsangam will change the direction of the ball of dushkrutham or at least lessen the force with which it will bounce back on us. Regards and prayers savitri Sincerely,Udayabhanu Panickaraum namahh Shivaaya OUR BODY IS THE ABODE OF THE JEEVATMAN, WHICH IS IN FACT THE PARABRAHMAN. LET US NOT MAKE IT A GRAVEYARD. LET US NOT EAT FLESH. LET US BE VEGETARIANS AND STAY HEALTHY. Chattampi Swamikal said that animals are to be loved, not eaten. Eating flesh is good neither for the mind nor for the intellect, not even for the body. It distorts the basic character of human. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 Dear Jaysree Menon and others,At least I have seen few Guruvayurappan devotees who eat meat and even beef. How can it eating flesh and Guruvayurappan devotion go together. See what one of our great Spiritual personality said about flesh eating.Abstain from eating the flesh of dead creatures. Living organisms are to be loved, not eaten. Non-vegetarianism is good neither for the mind nor for the intellect, not even for the body. Saints and Spiritual Masters have invariably advocated vegetarianism. Flesh eating distorts the basic character of human. This universe is the manifestation of but One mind, the Absolute. Alienation between one mind and another mind is unnatural. The mind of human is in no way different from the mind of any other creature. Love an insect, and it can be seen that it reciprocates. Moksham (Salvation) is the ultimate outcome of non-violence. Shree Vidyadhiraja Chattampi Swamikal Jayasree Menon <euroanuster wrote: Hello all,Hare Krishna !I too am a vegetarian. Can we all join Mr Manoj's path and take it as a dedication towards Lord ? At least that many animals will not be killed for we the group people for which I am sure, Lord will be pleased ! best regards2008/7/1 Manoj Kunniyur <kunniyurmanoj >: Om Namo Narayanaya Respected Guruvayur family members, As Savitriji and Panickerji say , let we all Guruvayurappa devotees be vegetarians. Proud to say that i became vegetarian after my membership in our group. I stopped having non veg food to show my grattitude to Bhagavan for His kind blessings. When i decided to be vegetarian everybody told me to think twice as already i was so slim when i was at home last time. They concerned that i may lack protins. But i had prayed Bhagavan and strongly decided to continue...believe it or not now my weight is inceased than earlier and i feel more healthy. I think people afraid of lacking protins while being vegetarians. It is not true. Having right vegetables and nuts give more protins than non veg. The other reason can be the unwillingness to quit the non veg taste. If we have some personal experiences where Bhagavan saved us why we should not sacrifies something for Bhagavan? "Lokame tharavad thanikkee chidikalum pulkalum puzhukkalum koodithan kudumbakkar" Hare Guruvayurappa!!! Manoj Kunniyur. --- On Fri, 6/27/08, Savitri Puram <savitriopuram > wrote: Savitri Puram <savitriopuram >Re: [Guruvayur] Namasthe- Sita and parrots guruvayur Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 11:58 PM Dear and respected Gopalkrishnaji, Since it was a sukhaparyavasaayi , it was really nice to read your real life story. The connection is amazing. I can imagine what all of you would have gone through when his whereabouts were unknown. I remember a story of a Nambudiri who destroyed several snake hills (pampu puttu) to cultivate something exotic. In that process, I think several snakes were killed. It seems his mother advised him not to destroy them like that. After a few months he was bitten by an extremely poisonous snake and he died before he could get any help. I was about 13 years when this happened. I still remember everybody talking about the curse of the snake. As small children we used to make paper boats, put small ants in the boat and let it flow in the rain water flowing down the steps or slopes. Whenever amma sees this she used to tell how sad the mother ant will feel if they were separated and something happens to either of them and told us not to do that. When things happen in the same life, and if we remember what paapam we did, we can try to connect. But when we get the results from past birth, we are unable to connect or do pariharam. Only thing karaneeyam or doable for us is to cause the least harm to the gross and subtle body of all creatures and even to plants and inanimate things. Once poet Vishnunarayanan Nambudiri told" Hinduism believes in living in harmony with he whole creation. We do not believe that God made everything on earth for us to use and enjoy life. That is one reason of recommending to be a vegetarian. Even killing plants is not desirable. But we stick to the principle of doing the least harm possible for our survival. This is how Hinduism is conceptually different from other religions." Regards and prayers Savitri On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:51 AM, K.V Gopalakrishna <gopalakrishna. kv (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: Dear all,Radhe Krishna!Beautiful story from Padma Puranam which Savitriji has told us. I shall tell you my personal experience.Although my father was a Sanskrit scholar and written the commentary of Narayaneeyam and many other stotras, it so happened that when we were living in Mavelikara, somebody brought a cage containing two parrots and presented to my father, and he took it. We as children were very fond of the parrots, and my father trained them to talk, etc., and they used to come out of the cage and sit on his hand, etc. They were so tamed. One day, one of the parrots escaped and flew away and only the other remained in the cage. My elder sister was married at the age of twelve in 1938. My B-i-l was living in Burmah at that time. After the marriage, my sister was not sent along with her husband as she had not attained puberty. When she attained puberty at the age of 14, my b-i-l came from Burmah and she was sent along with him to Burmah. And they were having a happy life, with the other members of the family also present in Burmah. In 1942, when the Japanese occupied Burmah, all women and children were asked to evacuate Burmah. My sister was one who came along with the others, and stayed with us. All the other members of the family were also allowed to go and they all came back, except my b-i-l who was threatened by the Burmah Corporation with whom he was working, with severe punishment if he attempted to go. He was stuck there in Burmah till 1945, facing the perils of war, and all atrocities the Japanese committed, somehow escaping death every day. His whereabouts were not known for nearly 4 years. We, especially my sister were so anxious and we could not do anything else other than to pray for my b-i-l's safety. My father immediately released the other parrot also.By end of 1945, we got one letter from him that he was safe, and he came back by beginning of 1946.My father realised that all these happened because we had kept the parrot in captivity. Ever since, we learned a lesson that we should never keep birds, animals, etc., in captivity. RegardsKVG. Savitri Puram wrote: Dear all, This is a story from Padma puranam. Heroine is our little Sita Devi of Mithila. She was about seven years old and was playing with her friends in her beautiful garden. Then two green parrots came there and started singing beautifully. It was not chirping of parrots, but they were singing Ramayana story as if somebody had taught them. They sang that part of the story where Rama came to Mithila and married Sita by breaking Siva's bow. Songs of the parrots were very clear and sweet. Sita fell in love with those parrots and asked where they learnt this song and who was this Rama and Sita. They said they learnt it from Valmiki Maharshi himself because they stayed in the same forest. Then they explained that Sita is the little girl in front of them asking questions and charming Prince Rama would come one day to marry her. Sita requested them to stay back so that she could listen to them everyday. Then the female parrot told Sita that she was pregnant and she would like to go back to her own forest and would come back after she delivered the children. But Sita could not resist the temptation of owning her and enjoying her sweet music and did not allow her to go. Female parrot was captured and was put in a beautiful cage. Sita told the female parrot: " I shall release you when that charming Rama you described come and marry me". Male parrot also begged Sita to free his wife, but Sita told him to come back later. This parrot who was pregnant was very sad to be separated from her beloved husband. She refused to eat and cried and cursed Sita, "Since you separated me from my beloved husband during pregnancy, you also will have to experience the same fate" . Having spoken thus the miserable female parrot uttered Rama naamam and died. Seeing this the male parrot was extremely sad and distressed and fell in to the Ganga and drowned himself. His last words were : "You killed my beautiful pregnant wife by separating her from me. I will take janma in Ayodhya and will cause your separation from your husband during your pregnancy". Later Rama married Sita. Ravana kidnapped her and Rama defeated Ravana and brought her back to Ayodhya. This male parrot was born as Krodhan, the washerman in Ayodhya and because of his harsh words Sita was exiled to the forest. Sita was pregnant at that time and she had to face separation from her husband living alone in the forest. Padma purana says that everybody has to experience the results of each and every karma we do. Either the results will be experienced in the same janma or in the subsequent janmaas. Rama and Sita being Purusha and Prakrithi, acted as if they were going through the suffering to show us that karmaphalam will always follow karmam. This story tells us to be considerate to other fellow creatures' feelings and pain. According to Njaanaananda Saraswathi Sukritham and Dushkritham are like bouncing balls. If we throw the ball of sukrutham, only the ball of sukrutham will bounce back. If we throw ball of Dushkrutham, only ball of dushkrutham will bounce back. But what about the balls of dushkruthum that we threw in the previous janmaas? We do not know how many balls we played with. Scriptures say, sankeerthanam and satsangam will change the direction of the ball of dushkrutham or at least lessen the force with which it will bounce back on us. Regards and prayers savitri -- Best regardsJayasree MenonBangalore+9900149461--A well-thought out plan, execution excellence, market timing, personal leadership are drivers of the growth trajectory. Sincerely,Udayabhanu Panickaraum namahh Shivaaya OUR BODY IS THE ABODE OF THE JEEVATMAN, WHICH IS IN FACT THE PARABRAHMAN. LET US NOT MAKE IT A GRAVEYARD. LET US NOT EAT FLESH. LET US BE VEGETARIANS AND STAY HEALTHY. Chattampi Swamikal said that animals are to be loved, not eaten. Eating flesh is good neither for the mind nor for the intellect, not even for the body. It distorts the basic character of human. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2008 Report Share Posted July 17, 2008 Hare Krishna!It has been clearly mentioned in our Bhagavatham that human body is not meant for flesh eating; but our food has been decided as vegetables. I totally agree with Udayabhanu sir, that there are lot of people who eat non veg while they go to temple.... How come is it happening? I mean, our conciousness will not stop us from stepping into the temple? I am not here to force anybody to be vegetarian.... But if by this mail, one devotee of this group realises and changes himself/herself, the purpose of this mail is served.May Lord Bless all!with regards 2008/7/17 Udayabhanu Panickar <udhayabhanupanickar: Dear Jaysree Menon and others,At least I have seen few Guruvayurappan devotees who eat meat and even beef. How can it eating flesh and Guruvayurappan devotion go together. See what one of our great Spiritual personality said about flesh eating. Abstain from eating the flesh of dead creatures. Living organisms are to be loved, not eaten. Non-vegetarianism is good neither for the mind nor for the intellect, not even for the body. Saints and Spiritual Masters have invariably advocated vegetarianism. Flesh eating distorts the basic character of human. This universe is the manifestation of but One mind, the Absolute. Alienation between one mind and another mind is unnatural. The mind of human is in no way different from the mind of any other creature. Love an insect, and it can be seen that it reciprocates. Moksham (Salvation) is the ultimate outcome of non-violence. Shree Vidyadhiraja Chattampi Swamikal Jayasree Menon <euroanuster wrote: Hello all,Hare Krishna !I too am a vegetarian. Can we all join Mr Manoj's path and take it as a dedication towards Lord ? At least that many animals will not be killed for we the group people for which I am sure, Lord will be pleased ! best regards2008/7/1 Manoj Kunniyur <kunniyurmanoj: Om Namo Narayanaya Respected Guruvayur family members, As Savitriji and Panickerji say , let we all Guruvayurappa devotees be vegetarians. Proud to say that i became vegetarian after my membership in our group. I stopped having non veg food to show my grattitude to Bhagavan for His kind blessings. When i decided to be vegetarian everybody told me to think twice as already i was so slim when i was at home last time. They concerned that i may lack protins. But i had prayed Bhagavan and strongly decided to continue...believe it or not now my weight is inceased than earlier and i feel more healthy. I think people afraid of lacking protins while being vegetarians. It is not true. Having right vegetables and nuts give more protins than non veg. The other reason can be the unwillingness to quit the non veg taste. If we have some personal experiences where Bhagavan saved us why we should not sacrifies something for Bhagavan? " Lokame tharavad thanikkee chidikalum pulkalum puzhukkalum koodithan kudumbakkar " Hare Guruvayurappa!!! Manoj Kunniyur. --- On Fri, 6/27/08, Savitri Puram <savitriopuram wrote: Savitri Puram <savitriopuramRe: [Guruvayur] Namasthe- Sita and parrots guruvayur Date: Friday, June 27, 2008, 11:58 PM Dear and respected Gopalkrishnaji, Since it was a sukhaparyavasaayi , it was really nice to read your real life story. The connection is amazing. I can imagine what all of you would have gone through when his whereabouts were unknown. I remember a story of a Nambudiri who destroyed several snake hills (pampu puttu) to cultivate something exotic. In that process, I think several snakes were killed. It seems his mother advised him not to destroy them like that. After a few months he was bitten by an extremely poisonous snake and he died before he could get any help. I was about 13 years when this happened. I still remember everybody talking about the curse of the snake. As small children we used to make paper boats, put small ants in the boat and let it flow in the rain water flowing down the steps or slopes. Whenever amma sees this she used to tell how sad the mother ant will feel if they were separated and something happens to either of them and told us not to do that. When things happen in the same life, and if we remember what paapam we did, we can try to connect. But when we get the results from past birth, we are unable to connect or do pariharam. Only thing karaneeyam or doable for us is to cause the least harm to the gross and subtle body of all creatures and even to plants and inanimate things. Once poet Vishnunarayanan Nambudiri told " Hinduism believes in living in harmony with he whole creation. We do not believe that God made everything on earth for us to use and enjoy life. That is one reason of recommending to be a vegetarian. Even killing plants is not desirable. But we stick to the principle of doing the least harm possible for our survival. This is how Hinduism is conceptually different from other religions. " Regards and prayers Savitri On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:51 AM, K.V Gopalakrishna <gopalakrishna. kv (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: Dear all,Radhe Krishna!Beautiful story from Padma Puranam which Savitriji has told us. I shall tell you my personal experience.Although my father was a Sanskrit scholar and written the commentary of Narayaneeyam and many other stotras, it so happened that when we were living in Mavelikara, somebody brought a cage containing two parrots and presented to my father, and he took it. We as children were very fond of the parrots, and my father trained them to talk, etc., and they used to come out of the cage and sit on his hand, etc. They were so tamed. One day, one of the parrots escaped and flew away and only the other remained in the cage. My elder sister was married at the age of twelve in 1938. My B-i-l was living in Burmah at that time. After the marriage, my sister was not sent along with her husband as she had not attained puberty. When she attained puberty at the age of 14, my b-i-l came from Burmah and she was sent along with him to Burmah. And they were having a happy life, with the other members of the family also present in Burmah. In 1942, when the Japanese occupied Burmah, all women and children were asked to evacuate Burmah. My sister was one who came along with the others, and stayed with us. All the other members of the family were also allowed to go and they all came back, except my b-i-l who was threatened by the Burmah Corporation with whom he was working, with severe punishment if he attempted to go. He was stuck there in Burmah till 1945, facing the perils of war, and all atrocities the Japanese committed, somehow escaping death every day. His whereabouts were not known for nearly 4 years. We, especially my sister were so anxious and we could not do anything else other than to pray for my b-i-l's safety. My father immediately released the other parrot also.By end of 1945, we got one letter from him that he was safe, and he came back by beginning of 1946.My father realised that all these happened because we had kept the parrot in captivity. Ever since, we learned a lesson that we should never keep birds, animals, etc., in captivity. RegardsKVG. Savitri Puram wrote: Dear all, This is a story from Padma puranam. Heroine is our little Sita Devi of Mithila. She was about seven years old and was playing with her friends in her beautiful garden. Then two green parrots came there and started singing beautifully. It was not chirping of parrots, but they were singing Ramayana story as if somebody had taught them. They sang that part of the story where Rama came to Mithila and married Sita by breaking Siva's bow. Songs of the parrots were very clear and sweet. Sita fell in love with those parrots and asked where they learnt this song and who was this Rama and Sita. They said they learnt it from Valmiki Maharshi himself because they stayed in the same forest. Then they explained that Sita is the little girl in front of them asking questions and charming Prince Rama would come one day to marry her. Sita requested them to stay back so that she could listen to them everyday. Then the female parrot told Sita that she was pregnant and she would like to go back to her own forest and would come back after she delivered the children. But Sita could not resist the temptation of owning her and enjoying her sweet music and did not allow her to go. Female parrot was captured and was put in a beautiful cage. Sita told the female parrot: " I shall release you when that charming Rama you described come and marry me " . Male parrot also begged Sita to free his wife, but Sita told him to come back later. This parrot who was pregnant was very sad to be separated from her beloved husband. She refused to eat and cried and cursed Sita, " Since you separated me from my beloved husband during pregnancy, you also will have to experience the same fate " . Having spoken thus the miserable female parrot uttered Rama naamam and died. Seeing this the male parrot was extremely sad and distressed and fell in to the Ganga and drowned himself. His last words were : " You killed my beautiful pregnant wife by separating her from me. I will take janma in Ayodhya and will cause your separation from your husband during your pregnancy " . Later Rama married Sita. Ravana kidnapped her and Rama defeated Ravana and brought her back to Ayodhya. This male parrot was born as Krodhan, the washerman in Ayodhya and because of his harsh words Sita was exiled to the forest. Sita was pregnant at that time and she had to face separation from her husband living alone in the forest. Padma purana says that everybody has to experience the results of each and every karma we do. Either the results will be experienced in the same janma or in the subsequent janmaas. Rama and Sita being Purusha and Prakrithi, acted as if they were going through the suffering to show us that karmaphalam will always follow karmam. This story tells us to be considerate to other fellow creatures' feelings and pain. According to Njaanaananda Saraswathi Sukritham and Dushkritham are like bouncing balls. If we throw the ball of sukrutham, only the ball of sukrutham will bounce back. If we throw ball of Dushkrutham, only ball of dushkrutham will bounce back. But what about the balls of dushkruthum that we threw in the previous janmaas? We do not know how many balls we played with. Scriptures say, sankeerthanam and satsangam will change the direction of the ball of dushkrutham or at least lessen the force with which it will bounce back on us. Regards and prayers savitri -- Best regardsJayasree MenonBangalore+9900149461--A well-thought out plan, execution excellence, market timing, personal leadership are drivers of the growth trajectory. Sincerely,Udayabhanu Panickaraum namahh Shivaaya OUR BODY IS THE ABODE OF THE JEEVATMAN, WHICH IS IN FACT THE PARABRAHMAN. LET US NOT MAKE IT A GRAVEYARD. LET US NOT EAT FLESH. LET US BE VEGETARIANS AND STAY HEALTHY. Chattampi Swamikal said that animals are to be loved, not eaten. Eating flesh is good neither for the mind nor for the intellect, not even for the body. It distorts the basic character of human. -- Best regardsJayasree MenonBangalore+9900149461--A well-thought out plan, execution excellence, market timing, personal leadership are drivers of the growth trajectory. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 Hari-Om. We do not have to look far for an answer. Our Bapuji was an ardent vegetarian . Let's all follow his foot steps. Mahatma Gandhi's Third Principle - Vegetarianism --------------- As a young child, Gandhi experimented with meat-eating. This was due partially to his inherent curiosity as well as his rather persuasive peer and friend Sheikh Mehtab. The idea of vegetarianism is deeply ingrained in Hindu and Jain traditions in India, and, in his native land of Gujarat, most Hindus were vegetarian and so are all Jains. The Gandhi family was no exception. Before leaving for his studies in London, Gandhi made a promise to his mother, Putlibai and his uncle, Becharji Swami that he would abstain from eating meat, taking alcohol, and engaging in promiscuity. He held fast to his promise and gained more than a diet: he gained a basis for his life-long philosophies. As Gandhi grew into adulthood, he became a strict vegetarian. He wrote the book The Moral Basis of Vegetarianism and several articles on the subject, some of which were published in the London Vegetarian Society's publication, The Vegetarian. Gandhi, himself, became inspired by many great minds during this period and befriended the chairman of the London Vegetarian Society, Dr. Josiah Oldfield. Having also read and admired the work of Henry Stephens Salt, the young Mohandas met and often corresponded with the vegetarian campaigner. Gandhi spent much time advocating vegetarianism during and after his time in London. To Gandhi, a vegetarian diet would not only satisfy the requirements of the body, it would also serve an economic purpose as meat was, and still is, generally more expensive than grains, vegetables, and fruits. Also, many Indians of the time struggled with low income, thus vegetarianism was seen not only as a spiritual practice but also a practical one. He abstained from eating for long periods, using fasting as a form of political protest. He refused to eat until his death or his demands were met. It was noted in his autobiography that vegetarianism was the beginning of his deep commitment to Brahmacharya; without total control of the palate, his success in Bramacharya would likely falter. Bapu had been a frutarian, but started taking goat's milk on the advice of his doctor. He never took the dairy products (of cow) largely because of his philosophical views, partially because of disgust for phooka, and, specifically, because of a vow to his late mother. Jai Shree Krishna ! guruvayur , Udayabhanu Panickar <udhayabhanupanickar wrote: > > Dear Jaysree Menon and others, > > At least I have seen few Guruvayurappan devotees who eat meat and even beef. How can it eating flesh and Guruvayurappan devotion go together. See what one of our great Spiritual personality said about flesh eating. > > Abstain from eating the flesh of dead creatures. Living organisms are to be loved, not eaten. Non-vegetarianism is good neither for the mind nor for the intellect, not even for the body. Saints and Spiritual Masters have invariably advocated vegetarianism. Flesh eating distorts the basic character of human. This universe is the manifestation of but One mind, the Absolute. Alienation between one mind and another mind is unnatural. The mind of human is in no way different from the mind of any other creature. Love an insect, and it can be seen that it reciprocates. Moksham (Salvation) is the ultimate outcome of non-violence. > > Shree Vidyadhiraja Chattampi Swamikal > > Jayasree Menon <euroanuster wrote: Hello all, > > Hare Krishna ! > > I too am a vegetarian. Can we all join Mr Manoj's path and take it as a dedication towards Lord ? At least that many animals will not be killed for we the group people for which I am sure, Lord will be pleased ! > > best regards > > > > > > 2008/7/1 Manoj Kunniyur <kunniyurmanoj: > > Om Namo Narayanaya > > Respected Guruvayur family members, > > As Savitriji and Panickerji say , let we all Guruvayurappa devotees be vegetarians. Proud to say that i became vegetarian after my membership in our group. I stopped having non veg food to show my grattitude to Bhagavan for His kind blessings. > > When i decided to be vegetarian everybody told me to think twice as already i was so slim when i was at home last time. They concerned that i may lack protins. But i had prayed Bhagavan and strongly decided to continue...believe it or not now my weight is inceased than earlier and i feel more healthy. > > I think people afraid of lacking protins while being vegetarians. It is not true. Having right vegetables and nuts give more protins than non veg. The other reason can be the unwillingness to quit the non veg taste. If we have some personal experiences where Bhagavan saved us why we should not sacrifies something for Bhagavan? > > " Lokame tharavad thanikkee chidikalum > pulkalum puzhukkalum koodithan kudumbakkar " > > > Hare Guruvayurappa!!! > > > Manoj Kunniyur. > > > > --- On Fri, 6/27/08, Savitri Puram <savitriopuram wrote: > > Savitri Puram <savitriopuram > Re: [Guruvayur] Namasthe- Sita and parrots > guruvayur > Friday, June 27, 2008, 11:58 PM > > > Dear and respected Gopalkrishnaji, > > Since it was a sukhaparyavasaayi , it was really nice to read your real life story. The connection is amazing. I can imagine what all of you would have gone through when his whereabouts were unknown. > > I remember a story of a Nambudiri who destroyed several snake hills (pampu puttu) to cultivate something exotic. In that process, I think several snakes were killed. It seems his mother advised him not to destroy them like that. After a few months he was bitten by an extremely poisonous snake and he died before he could get any help. I was about 13 years when this happened. I still remember everybody talking about the curse of the snake. > > As small children we used to make paper boats, put small ants in the boat and let it flow in the rain water flowing down the steps or slopes. Whenever amma sees this she used to tell how sad the mother ant will feel if they were separated and something happens to either of them and told us not to do that. > > When things happen in the same life, and if we remember what paapam we did, we can try to connect. But when we get the results from past birth, we are unable to connect or do pariharam. Only thing karaneeyam or doable for us is to cause the least harm to the gross and subtle body of all creatures and even to plants and inanimate things. Once poet Vishnunarayanan Nambudiri told " Hinduism believes in living in harmony with he whole creation. We do not believe that God made everything on earth for us to use and enjoy life. That is one reason of recommending to be a vegetarian. Even killing plants is not desirable. But we stick to the principle of doing the least harm possible for our survival. This is how Hinduism is conceptually different from other religions. " > > Regards and prayers > > Savitri > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:51 AM, K.V Gopalakrishna <gopalakrishna. kv (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: > Dear all, > Radhe Krishna! > Beautiful story from Padma Puranam which Savitriji has told us. I shall tell you my personal experience. > > Although my father was a Sanskrit scholar and written the commentary of Narayaneeyam and many other stotras, it so happened that when we were living in Mavelikara, somebody brought a cage containing two parrots and presented to my father, and he took it. We as children were very fond of the parrots, and my father trained them to talk, etc., and they used to come out of the cage and sit on his hand, etc. They were so tamed. One day, one of the parrots escaped and flew away and only the other remained in the cage. > > My elder sister was married at the age of twelve in 1938. My B-i-l was living in Burmah at that time. After the marriage, my sister was not sent along with her husband as she had not attained puberty. When she attained puberty at the age of 14, my b-i-l came from Burmah and she was sent along with him to Burmah. And they were having a happy life, with the other members of the family also present in Burmah. > > In 1942, when the Japanese occupied Burmah, all women and children were asked to evacuate Burmah. My sister was one who came along with the others, and stayed with us. All the other members of the family were also allowed to go and they all came back, except my b-i-l who was threatened by the Burmah Corporation with whom he was working, with severe punishment if he attempted to go. He was stuck there in Burmah till 1945, facing the perils of war, and all atrocities the Japanese committed, somehow escaping death every day. His whereabouts were not known for nearly 4 years. We, especially my sister were so anxious and we could not do anything else other than to pray for my b-i-l's safety. My father immediately released the other parrot also. > > By end of 1945, we got one letter from him that he was safe, and he came back by beginning of 1946. > > My father realised that all these happened because we had kept the parrot in captivity. Ever since, we learned a lesson that we should never keep birds, animals, etc., in captivity. > > Regards > KVG. > > > > > > Savitri Puram wrote: Dear all, > > > This is a story from Padma puranam. Heroine is our little Sita Devi of Mithila. She was about seven years old and was playing with her friends in her beautiful garden. Then two green parrots came there and started singing beautifully. It was not chirping of parrots, but they were singing Ramayana story as if somebody had taught them. They sang that part of the story where Rama came to Mithila and married Sita by breaking Siva's bow. Songs of the parrots were very clear and sweet. Sita fell in love with those parrots and asked where they learnt this song and who was this Rama and Sita. They said they learnt it from Valmiki Maharshi himself because they stayed in the same forest. Then they explained that Sita is the little girl in front of them asking questions and charming Prince Rama would come one day to marry her. > > Sita requested them to stay back so that she could listen to them everyday. Then the female parrot told Sita that she was pregnant and she would like to go back to her own forest and would come back after she delivered the children. But Sita could not resist the temptation of owning her and enjoying her sweet music and did not allow her to go. Female parrot was captured and was put in a beautiful cage. Sita told the female parrot: " I shall release you when that charming Rama you described come and marry me " . > > Male parrot also begged Sita to free his wife, but Sita told him to come back later. This parrot who was pregnant was very sad to be separated from her beloved husband. She refused to eat and cried and cursed Sita, " Since you separated me from my beloved husband during pregnancy, you also will have to experience the same fate " . > > Having spoken thus the miserable female parrot uttered Rama naamam and died. Seeing this the male parrot was extremely sad and distressed and fell in to the Ganga and drowned himself. His last words were : " You killed my beautiful pregnant wife by separating her from me. I will take janma in Ayodhya and will cause your separation from your husband during your pregnancy " . > > Later Rama married Sita. Ravana kidnapped her and Rama defeated Ravana and brought her back to Ayodhya. This male parrot was born as Krodhan, the washerman in Ayodhya and because of his harsh words Sita was exiled to the forest. Sita was pregnant at that time and she had to face separation from her husband living alone in the forest. Padma purana says that everybody has to experience the results of each and every karma we do. Either the results will be experienced in the same janma or in the subsequent janmaas. > > Rama and Sita being Purusha and Prakrithi, acted as if they were going through the suffering to show us that karmaphalam will always follow karmam. This story tells us to be considerate to other fellow creatures' feelings and pain. > > According to Njaanaananda Saraswathi Sukritham and Dushkritham are like bouncing balls. If we throw the ball of sukrutham, only the ball of sukrutham will bounce back. If we throw ball of Dushkrutham, only ball of dushkrutham will bounce back. But what about the balls of dushkruthum that we threw in the previous janmaas? We do not know how many balls we played with. Scriptures say, sankeerthanam and satsangam will change the direction of the ball of dushkrutham or at least lessen the force with which it will bounce back on us. > > Regards and prayers > > savitri > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards > > Jayasree Menon > Bangalore > +9900149461 > -- ------------ > A well-thought out plan, execution excellence, market timing, personal leadership are drivers of the growth trajectory. > > > > > > Sincerely, > > Udayabhanu Panickar > aum namahh Shivaaya > > OUR BODY IS THE ABODE OF THE JEEVATMAN, WHICH IS IN FACT THE PARABRAHMAN. LET US NOT MAKE IT A GRAVEYARD. LET US NOT EAT FLESH. LET US BE VEGETARIANS AND STAY HEALTHY. Chattampi Swamikal said that animals are to be loved, not eaten. Eating flesh is good neither for the mind nor for the intellect, not even for the body. It distorts the basic character of human. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 Very Interesting article, i also like to use vegitable foods , but in middle east there is no chance to use everyday, but after read that we ll try to change. tks for this nice article --- On Thu, 7/17/08, Udayabhanu Panickar <udhayabhanupanickar wrote: Udayabhanu Panickar <udhayabhanupanickarRe: [Guruvayur] Lets be vegetarians.guruvayur Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008, 9:32 AM Dear Friends,Here is an article on vegetarian food. Hope it is OK with the moderators.Thanks. Dr. Colin Campbell: Plant-Based Diet Is Key To Healthy Livingby RunTex Staff, 5/19/2005 Dr. Colin Campbell: Plant-Based Diet Is Key To Healthy Living By Wish Dr. T. Colin Campbell, author of The China Study, presented a compelling (and at times, chilling) argument Wednesday night that a plant-based diet can virtually wipe out most of the common diseases and health risks that afflict millions of Americans every year. As the second guest in the RunTex Speaker Series, Campbell spoke before a packed house of runners, vegans and a handful of skeptics at RunTex. Campbell was introduced to the RunTex crowd by local triathlete Rip Esselstyn whose father-Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn Jr.-was the first speaker in the series who also espoused the key to healthy living is a plant-based diet. In that respect, Campbell didn't differ from Esselstyn whom he called "a kindred spirit." Both men are nutritional researchers who have studied the dietary and nutritional customs of cultures all over the world. Their studies and others have concluded, according to Campbell, "That all favor a plant-based diet for minimal disease risk. While Esselstyn's primary interest is the positive effects of a plant-based diet on artery and heart disease, Campbell's presentation- It's Time to Take Our Food Choices Seriously-was more geared to making healthier choices (i.e., plant-based foods) for improved performance. He said how a vegan diet not only does not reduce strength, but cited two prominent studies that showed how it improves strength significantly. He mentioned such well-known vegan performance athletes as Ironman Dave Scott, two-time Olympic marathon Pete Pfitzinger and tennis star Martina Navratilova who all had exceptionally long athletic careers which, Campbell said, was due in part to their vegan diet Like Esselstyn, Campbell was raised on a farm and "went to college as a meat and potatoes guy to learn how to grow cattle. I was happy to believe that the American diet was the best in the world." But what he found was much different. In the 1950s, Campbell was part of a team of researchers who went to the Philippines to study ways to introduce more protein into the diet of malnourished children. He was initially confused why so many Filipino children were being diagnosed with liver cancer, primarily an adult disease. What he found was that the children from the more affluent families who had the most protein in their diet also had the highest incidence of liver cancer. The poorer children who had less protein had the lowest incidence of liver cancer. Campbell, who is a professor emeritus of nutritional biochemistry at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, delved deeper into the relationship between high protein diets and diseases. He presented two remarkable animal studies last night. One of the studies was done on two control groups of rats. The first group was fed a diet which was comprised of 20 percent protein. The other group was fed a diet of only five percent protein. In the first group, every one of the 30 rats developed tumors and cancers. There were none in the second group. In another two-year study of two animal groups, one was fed a diet of 20 percent protein (in this case, casein which is an experimental protein that is 87 percent cows' milk). The other group was fed a diet of five percent soy and wheat protein. After two years, all the animals on the protein-rich diet were dead. There were no casualties in the other group. Campbell's conclusion? "Cancer is a diet and lifestyle decision," he told the crowd at RunTex. "It is not a genetic event. Family history and genes do not matter." Essentially, that's what Campbell's landmark, 20-year China Study also demonstrated. He and his team of researchers studied and collected data from adults in villages all over China. After analyzing the results, Campbell summarized: "People who ate the most animal-based foods got the most chronic disease. People who favored a plant-based diet were the healthiest and avoided disease." In contrast, Campbell showed that American women are five times more likely to get breast cancer and reach menopause four years earlier than Chinese women. American men are certainly not immune. Twelve of 14 studies showed a positive association between consumption of dairy products and prostate cancer, Campbell said. "There is little question," said Campbell, "that a plant-based diet has a broad-based effect that will prevent typical American diseases such as acne, depression, Alzheimer's, kidney stones, multiple sclerosis and heart disease." Campbell then wondered aloud why, if the negative impact of too much protein in the diet and the benefits of a plant-based diet are true, we haven't heard more about it. The reason, Campbell made clear, is the food industry and its powerful lobbying efforts as well as the government's irresponsible research which is often funded by the food industry. As evidence, Campbell showed the recommendations by the Food and Nutrition Board that "to meet the body's daily nutritional needs while minimizing risk for disease, adults should consume 10-35 percent of their diet from protein." Not! It should be less than 10 percent, says Campbell. Another study, sponsored by such groups as M & Ms, the Dannon Yogurt Board and the soft drink industry, recommended that added sugars-soft and fruit drinks, pastries and candy-should comprise no more than 25 percent of total calorie consumption when it should be miniscule. Clearly the blame, Campbell said, lies with the funding of such studies and the wide dissemination which he also blames on researchers who have been bought off by the food industry. Campbell concluded his talk by admonishing the audience, "It's time we stop thinking of health coming from a pill and start thinking of health as coming from food." Indeed. FROM: http://www.runtex. com/web/1- 189.asp Manoj Kunniyur <kunniyurmanoj@ > wrote: Om Namo Narayanaya Respected Guruvayur family members, As Savitriji and Panickerji say , let we all Guruvayurappa devotees be vegetarians. Proud to say that i became vegetarian after my membership in our group. I stopped having non veg food to show my grattitude to Bhagavan for His kind blessings. When i decided to be vegetarian everybody told me to think twice as already i was so slim when i was at home last time. They concerned that i may lack protins. But i had prayed Bhagavan and strongly decided to continue...believe it or not now my weight is inceased than earlier and i feel more healthy. I think people afraid of lacking protins while being vegetarians. It is not true. Having right vegetables and nuts give more protins than non veg. The other reason can be the unwillingness to quit the non veg taste. If we have some personal experiences where Bhagavan saved us why we should not sacrifies something for Bhagavan? "Lokame tharavad thanikkee chidikalum pulkalum puzhukkalum koodithan kudumbakkar" Hare Guruvayurappa! !! Manoj Kunniyur. --- On Fri, 6/27/08, Savitri Puram <savitriopuram@ gmail.com> wrote: Savitri Puram <savitriopuram@ gmail.com>Re: [Guruvayur] Namasthe- Sita and parrotsguruvayur@grou ps.comFriday, June 27, 2008, 11:58 PM Dear and respected Gopalkrishnaji, Since it was a sukhaparyavasaayi , it was really nice to read your real life story. The connection is amazing. I can imagine what all of you would have gone through when his whereabouts were unknown. I remember a story of a Nambudiri who destroyed several snake hills (pampu puttu) to cultivate something exotic. In that process, I think several snakes were killed. It seems his mother advised him not to destroy them like that. After a few months he was bitten by an extremely poisonous snake and he died before he could get any help. I was about 13 years when this happened. I still remember everybody talking about the curse of the snake. As small children we used to make paper boats, put small ants in the boat and let it flow in the rain water flowing down the steps or slopes. Whenever amma sees this she used to tell how sad the mother ant will feel if they were separated and something happens to either of them and told us not to do that. When things happen in the same life, and if we remember what paapam we did, we can try to connect. But when we get the results from past birth, we are unable to connect or do pariharam. Only thing karaneeyam or doable for us is to cause the least harm to the gross and subtle body of all creatures and even to plants and inanimate things. Once poet Vishnunarayanan Nambudiri told" Hinduism believes in living in harmony with he whole creation. We do not believe that God made everything on earth for us to use and enjoy life. That is one reason of recommending to be a vegetarian. Even killing plants is not desirable. But we stick to the principle of doing the least harm possible for our survival. This is how Hinduism is conceptually different from other religions." Regards and prayers Savitri On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:51 AM, K.V Gopalakrishna <gopalakrishna. kv (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: Dear all,Radhe Krishna!Beautiful story from Padma Puranam which Savitriji has told us. I shall tell you my personal experience.Although my father was a Sanskrit scholar and written the commentary of Narayaneeyam and many other stotras, it so happened that when we were living in Mavelikara, somebody brought a cage containing two parrots and presented to my father, and he took it. We as children were very fond of the parrots, and my father trained them to talk, etc., and they used to come out of the cage and sit on his hand, etc. They were so tamed. One day, one of the parrots escaped and flew away and only the other remained in the cage.My elder sister was married at the age of twelve in 1938. My B-i-l was living in Burmah at that time. After the marriage, my sister was not sent along with her husband as she had not attained puberty. When she attained puberty at the age of 14, my b-i-l came from Burmah and she was sent along with him to Burmah. And they were having a happy life, with the other members of the family also present in Burmah. In 1942, when the Japanese occupied Burmah, all women and children were asked to evacuate Burmah. My sister was one who came along with the others, and stayed with us. All the other members of the family were also allowed to go and they all came back, except my b-i-l who was threatened by the Burmah Corporation with whom he was working, with severe punishment if he attempted to go. He was stuck there in Burmah till 1945, facing the perils of war, and all atrocities the Japanese committed, somehow escaping death every day. His whereabouts were not known for nearly 4 years. We, especially my sister were so anxious and we could not do anything else other than to pray for my b-i-l's safety. My father immediately released the other parrot also.By end of 1945, we got one letter from him that he was safe, and he came back by beginning of 1946.My father realised that all these happened because we had kept the parrot in captivity. Ever since, we learned a lesson that we should never keep birds, animals, etc., in captivity.RegardsKVG. Savitri Puram wrote: Dear all, This is a story from Padma puranam. Heroine is our little Sita Devi of Mithila. She was about seven years old and was playing with her friends in her beautiful garden. Then two green parrots came there and started singing beautifully. It was not chirping of parrots, but they were singing Ramayana story as if somebody had taught them. They sang that part of the story where Rama came to Mithila and married Sita by breaking Siva's bow. Songs of the parrots were very clear and sweet. Sita fell in love with those parrots and asked where they learnt this song and who was this Rama and Sita. They said they learnt it from Valmiki Maharshi himself because they stayed in the same forest. Then they explained that Sita is the little girl in front of them asking questions and charming Prince Rama would come one day to marry her. Sita requested them to stay back so that she could listen to them everyday. Then the female parrot told Sita that she was pregnant and she would like to go back to her own forest and would come back after she delivered the children. But Sita could not resist the temptation of owning her and enjoying her sweet music and did not allow her to go. Female parrot was captured and was put in a beautiful cage. Sita told the female parrot: " I shall release you when that charming Rama you described come and marry me". Male parrot also begged Sita to free his wife, but Sita told him to come back later. This parrot who was pregnant was very sad to be separated from her beloved husband. She refused to eat and cried and cursed Sita, "Since you separated me from my beloved husband during pregnancy, you also will have to experience the same fate" . Having spoken thus the miserable female parrot uttered Rama naamam and died. Seeing this the male parrot was extremely sad and distressed and fell in to the Ganga and drowned himself. His last words were : "You killed my beautiful pregnant wife by separating her from me. I will take janma in Ayodhya and will cause your separation from your husband during your pregnancy". Later Rama married Sita. Ravana kidnapped her and Rama defeated Ravana and brought her back to Ayodhya. This male parrot was born as Krodhan, the washerman in Ayodhya and because of his harsh words Sita was exiled to the forest. Sita was pregnant at that time and she had to face separation from her husband living alone in the forest. Padma purana says that everybody has to experience the results of each and every karma we do. Either the results will be experienced in the same janma or in the subsequent janmaas. Rama and Sita being Purusha and Prakrithi, acted as if they were going through the suffering to show us that karmaphalam will always follow karmam. This story tells us to be considerate to other fellow creatures' feelings and pain. According to Njaanaananda Saraswathi Sukritham and Dushkritham are like bouncing balls. If we throw the ball of sukrutham, only the ball of sukrutham will bounce back. If we throw ball of Dushkrutham, only ball of dushkrutham will bounce back. But what about the balls of dushkruthum that we threw in the previous janmaas? We do not know how many balls we played with. Scriptures say, sankeerthanam and satsangam will change the direction of the ball of dushkrutham or at least lessen the force with which it will bounce back on us. Regards and prayers savitri Sincerely,Udayabhanu Panickaraum namahh ShivaayaOUR BODY IS THE ABODE OF THE JEEVATMAN, WHICH IS IN FACT THE PARABRAHMAN. LET US NOT MAKE IT A GRAVEYARD. LET US NOT EAT FLESH. LET US BE VEGETARIANS AND STAY HEALTHY. Chattampi Swamikal said that animals are to be loved, not eaten. Eating flesh is good neither for the mind nor for the intellect, not even for the body. It distorts the basic character of human. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 Hello all non vegetariansIf you all want to change to vegetarianism, is it not possible to switch over to grains like Rajma, Dal, Kabuli channa are available with which probably people are managing... Sorry if my options are not acceptable.... best regardsHare Krishna !2008/7/18 vinod gopal <vinodgopalpillai: Very Interesting article, i also like to use vegitable foods , but in middle east there is no chance to use everyday, but after read that we ll try to change. tks for this nice article --- On Thu, 7/17/08, Udayabhanu Panickar <udhayabhanupanickar wrote: Udayabhanu Panickar <udhayabhanupanickar Re: [Guruvayur] Lets be vegetarians.guruvayur Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008, 9:32 AM Dear Friends,Here is an article on vegetarian food. Hope it is OK with the moderators.Thanks. Dr. Colin Campbell: Plant-Based Diet Is Key To Healthy Livingby RunTex Staff, 5/19/2005 Dr. Colin Campbell: Plant-Based Diet Is Key To Healthy Living By Wish Dr. T. Colin Campbell, author of The China Study, presented a compelling (and at times, chilling) argument Wednesday night that a plant-based diet can virtually wipe out most of the common diseases and health risks that afflict millions of Americans every year. As the second guest in the RunTex Speaker Series, Campbell spoke before a packed house of runners, vegans and a handful of skeptics at RunTex. Campbell was introduced to the RunTex crowd by local triathlete Rip Esselstyn whose father-Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn Jr.-was the first speaker in the series who also espoused the key to healthy living is a plant-based diet. In that respect, Campbell didn't differ from Esselstyn whom he called " a kindred spirit. " Both men are nutritional researchers who have studied the dietary and nutritional customs of cultures all over the world. Their studies and others have concluded, according to Campbell, " That all favor a plant-based diet for minimal disease risk. While Esselstyn's primary interest is the positive effects of a plant-based diet on artery and heart disease, Campbell's presentation- It's Time to Take Our Food Choices Seriously-was more geared to making healthier choices (i.e., plant-based foods) for improved performance. He said how a vegan diet not only does not reduce strength, but cited two prominent studies that showed how it improves strength significantly. He mentioned such well-known vegan performance athletes as Ironman Dave Scott, two-time Olympic marathon Pete Pfitzinger and tennis star Martina Navratilova who all had exceptionally long athletic careers which, Campbell said, was due in part to their vegan diet Like Esselstyn, Campbell was raised on a farm and " went to college as a meat and potatoes guy to learn how to grow cattle. I was happy to believe that the American diet was the best in the world. " But what he found was much different. In the 1950s, Campbell was part of a team of researchers who went to the Philippines to study ways to introduce more protein into the diet of malnourished children. He was initially confused why so many Filipino children were being diagnosed with liver cancer, primarily an adult disease. What he found was that the children from the more affluent families who had the most protein in their diet also had the highest incidence of liver cancer. The poorer children who had less protein had the lowest incidence of liver cancer. Campbell, who is a professor emeritus of nutritional biochemistry at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, delved deeper into the relationship between high protein diets and diseases. He presented two remarkable animal studies last night. One of the studies was done on two control groups of rats. The first group was fed a diet which was comprised of 20 percent protein. The other group was fed a diet of only five percent protein. In the first group, every one of the 30 rats developed tumors and cancers. There were none in the second group. In another two-year study of two animal groups, one was fed a diet of 20 percent protein (in this case, casein which is an experimental protein that is 87 percent cows' milk). The other group was fed a diet of five percent soy and wheat protein. After two years, all the animals on the protein-rich diet were dead. There were no casualties in the other group. Campbell's conclusion? " Cancer is a diet and lifestyle decision, " he told the crowd at RunTex. " It is not a genetic event. Family history and genes do not matter. " Essentially, that's what Campbell's landmark, 20-year China Study also demonstrated. He and his team of researchers studied and collected data from adults in villages all over China. After analyzing the results, Campbell summarized: " People who ate the most animal-based foods got the most chronic disease. People who favored a plant-based diet were the healthiest and avoided disease. " In contrast, Campbell showed that American women are five times more likely to get breast cancer and reach menopause four years earlier than Chinese women. American men are certainly not immune. Twelve of 14 studies showed a positive association between consumption of dairy products and prostate cancer, Campbell said. " There is little question, " said Campbell, " that a plant-based diet has a broad-based effect that will prevent typical American diseases such as acne, depression, Alzheimer's, kidney stones, multiple sclerosis and heart disease. " Campbell then wondered aloud why, if the negative impact of too much protein in the diet and the benefits of a plant-based diet are true, we haven't heard more about it. The reason, Campbell made clear, is the food industry and its powerful lobbying efforts as well as the government's irresponsible research which is often funded by the food industry. As evidence, Campbell showed the recommendations by the Food and Nutrition Board that " to meet the body's daily nutritional needs while minimizing risk for disease, adults should consume 10-35 percent of their diet from protein. " Not! It should be less than 10 percent, says Campbell. Another study, sponsored by such groups as M & Ms, the Dannon Yogurt Board and the soft drink industry, recommended that added sugars-soft and fruit drinks, pastries and candy-should comprise no more than 25 percent of total calorie consumption when it should be miniscule. Clearly the blame, Campbell said, lies with the funding of such studies and the wide dissemination which he also blames on researchers who have been bought off by the food industry. Campbell concluded his talk by admonishing the audience, " It's time we stop thinking of health coming from a pill and start thinking of health as coming from food. " Indeed. FROM: http://www.runtex. com/web/1- 189.asp Manoj Kunniyur <kunniyurmanoj@ > wrote: Om Namo Narayanaya Respected Guruvayur family members, As Savitriji and Panickerji say , let we all Guruvayurappa devotees be vegetarians. Proud to say that i became vegetarian after my membership in our group. I stopped having non veg food to show my grattitude to Bhagavan for His kind blessings. When i decided to be vegetarian everybody told me to think twice as already i was so slim when i was at home last time. They concerned that i may lack protins. But i had prayed Bhagavan and strongly decided to continue...believe it or not now my weight is inceased than earlier and i feel more healthy. I think people afraid of lacking protins while being vegetarians. It is not true. Having right vegetables and nuts give more protins than non veg. The other reason can be the unwillingness to quit the non veg taste. If we have some personal experiences where Bhagavan saved us why we should not sacrifies something for Bhagavan? " Lokame tharavad thanikkee chidikalum pulkalum puzhukkalum koodithan kudumbakkar " Hare Guruvayurappa! !! Manoj Kunniyur. --- On Fri, 6/27/08, Savitri Puram <savitriopuram@ gmail.com> wrote: Savitri Puram <savitriopuram@ gmail.com>Re: [Guruvayur] Namasthe- Sita and parrots guruvayur@grou ps.comFriday, June 27, 2008, 11:58 PM Dear and respected Gopalkrishnaji, Since it was a sukhaparyavasaayi , it was really nice to read your real life story. The connection is amazing. I can imagine what all of you would have gone through when his whereabouts were unknown. I remember a story of a Nambudiri who destroyed several snake hills (pampu puttu) to cultivate something exotic. In that process, I think several snakes were killed. It seems his mother advised him not to destroy them like that. After a few months he was bitten by an extremely poisonous snake and he died before he could get any help. I was about 13 years when this happened. I still remember everybody talking about the curse of the snake. As small children we used to make paper boats, put small ants in the boat and let it flow in the rain water flowing down the steps or slopes. Whenever amma sees this she used to tell how sad the mother ant will feel if they were separated and something happens to either of them and told us not to do that. When things happen in the same life, and if we remember what paapam we did, we can try to connect. But when we get the results from past birth, we are unable to connect or do pariharam. Only thing karaneeyam or doable for us is to cause the least harm to the gross and subtle body of all creatures and even to plants and inanimate things. Once poet Vishnunarayanan Nambudiri told " Hinduism believes in living in harmony with he whole creation. We do not believe that God made everything on earth for us to use and enjoy life. That is one reason of recommending to be a vegetarian. Even killing plants is not desirable. But we stick to the principle of doing the least harm possible for our survival. This is how Hinduism is conceptually different from other religions. " Regards and prayers Savitri On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:51 AM, K.V Gopalakrishna <gopalakrishna. kv (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote: Dear all,Radhe Krishna!Beautiful story from Padma Puranam which Savitriji has told us. I shall tell you my personal experience.Although my father was a Sanskrit scholar and written the commentary of Narayaneeyam and many other stotras, it so happened that when we were living in Mavelikara, somebody brought a cage containing two parrots and presented to my father, and he took it. We as children were very fond of the parrots, and my father trained them to talk, etc., and they used to come out of the cage and sit on his hand, etc. They were so tamed. One day, one of the parrots escaped and flew away and only the other remained in the cage. My elder sister was married at the age of twelve in 1938. My B-i-l was living in Burmah at that time. After the marriage, my sister was not sent along with her husband as she had not attained puberty. When she attained puberty at the age of 14, my b-i-l came from Burmah and she was sent along with him to Burmah. And they were having a happy life, with the other members of the family also present in Burmah. In 1942, when the Japanese occupied Burmah, all women and children were asked to evacuate Burmah. My sister was one who came along with the others, and stayed with us. All the other members of the family were also allowed to go and they all came back, except my b-i-l who was threatened by the Burmah Corporation with whom he was working, with severe punishment if he attempted to go. He was stuck there in Burmah till 1945, facing the perils of war, and all atrocities the Japanese committed, somehow escaping death every day. His whereabouts were not known for nearly 4 years. We, especially my sister were so anxious and we could not do anything else other than to pray for my b-i-l's safety. My father immediately released the other parrot also.By end of 1945, we got one letter from him that he was safe, and he came back by beginning of 1946.My father realised that all these happened because we had kept the parrot in captivity. Ever since, we learned a lesson that we should never keep birds, animals, etc., in captivity. RegardsKVG. Savitri Puram wrote: Dear all, This is a story from Padma puranam. Heroine is our little Sita Devi of Mithila. She was about seven years old and was playing with her friends in her beautiful garden. Then two green parrots came there and started singing beautifully. It was not chirping of parrots, but they were singing Ramayana story as if somebody had taught them. They sang that part of the story where Rama came to Mithila and married Sita by breaking Siva's bow. Songs of the parrots were very clear and sweet. Sita fell in love with those parrots and asked where they learnt this song and who was this Rama and Sita. They said they learnt it from Valmiki Maharshi himself because they stayed in the same forest. Then they explained that Sita is the little girl in front of them asking questions and charming Prince Rama would come one day to marry her. Sita requested them to stay back so that she could listen to them everyday. Then the female parrot told Sita that she was pregnant and she would like to go back to her own forest and would come back after she delivered the children. But Sita could not resist the temptation of owning her and enjoying her sweet music and did not allow her to go. Female parrot was captured and was put in a beautiful cage. Sita told the female parrot: " I shall release you when that charming Rama you described come and marry me " . Male parrot also begged Sita to free his wife, but Sita told him to come back later. This parrot who was pregnant was very sad to be separated from her beloved husband. She refused to eat and cried and cursed Sita, " Since you separated me from my beloved husband during pregnancy, you also will have to experience the same fate " . Having spoken thus the miserable female parrot uttered Rama naamam and died. Seeing this the male parrot was extremely sad and distressed and fell in to the Ganga and drowned himself. His last words were : " You killed my beautiful pregnant wife by separating her from me. I will take janma in Ayodhya and will cause your separation from your husband during your pregnancy " . Later Rama married Sita. Ravana kidnapped her and Rama defeated Ravana and brought her back to Ayodhya. This male parrot was born as Krodhan, the washerman in Ayodhya and because of his harsh words Sita was exiled to the forest. Sita was pregnant at that time and she had to face separation from her husband living alone in the forest. Padma purana says that everybody has to experience the results of each and every karma we do. Either the results will be experienced in the same janma or in the subsequent janmaas. Rama and Sita being Purusha and Prakrithi, acted as if they were going through the suffering to show us that karmaphalam will always follow karmam. This story tells us to be considerate to other fellow creatures' feelings and pain. According to Njaanaananda Saraswathi Sukritham and Dushkritham are like bouncing balls. If we throw the ball of sukrutham, only the ball of sukrutham will bounce back. If we throw ball of Dushkrutham, only ball of dushkrutham will bounce back. But what about the balls of dushkruthum that we threw in the previous janmaas? We do not know how many balls we played with. Scriptures say, sankeerthanam and satsangam will change the direction of the ball of dushkrutham or at least lessen the force with which it will bounce back on us. Regards and prayers savitri Sincerely,Udayabhanu Panickaraum namahh Shivaaya OUR BODY IS THE ABODE OF THE JEEVATMAN, WHICH IS IN FACT THE PARABRAHMAN. LET US NOT MAKE IT A GRAVEYARD. LET US NOT EAT FLESH. LET US BE VEGETARIANS AND STAY HEALTHY. Chattampi Swamikal said that animals are to be loved, not eaten. Eating flesh is good neither for the mind nor for the intellect, not even for the body. It distorts the basic character of human. -- Best regardsJayasree MenonBangalore+9900149461--A well-thought out plan, execution excellence, market timing, personal leadership are drivers of the growth trajectory. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2008 Report Share Posted July 18, 2008 Dear Friends, Radhe Krishna!~ Here is an article on vegetarian food, received from another group, based on a scientific study by a foreigner. Hope it is OK with the moderators. Thanks. KVG Dr. Colin Campbell: Plant-Based Diet Is Key To Healthy Living by RunTex Staff, 5/19/2005 Dr. Colin Campbell: Plant-Based Diet Is Key To Healthy Living By Wish Dr. T. Colin Campbell, author of The China Study, presented a compelling (and at times, chilling) argument Wednesday night that a plant-based diet can virtually wipe out most of the common diseases and health risks that afflict millions of Americans every year. As the second guest in the RunTex Speaker Series, Campbell spoke before a packed house of runners, vegans and a handful of skeptics at RunTex. Campbell was introduced to the RunTex crowd by local triathlete Rip Esselstyn whose father-Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn Jr.-was the first speaker in the series who also espoused the key to healthy living is a plant-based diet. In that respect, Campbell didn't differ from Esselstyn whom he called "a kindred spirit." Both men are nutritional researchers who have studied the dietary and nutritional customs of cultures all over the world. Their studies and others have concluded, according to Campbell, "That all favor a plant-based diet for minimal disease risk. While Esselstyn's primary interest is the positive effects of a plant-based diet on artery and heart disease, Campbell's presentation-It's Time to Take Our Food Choices Seriously-was more geared to making healthier choices (i.e., plant-based foods) for improved performance. He said how a vegan diet not only does not reduce strength, but cited two prominent studies that showed how it improves strength significantly. He mentioned such well-known vegan performance athletes as Ironman Dave Scott, two-time Olympic marathon Pete Pfitzinger and tennis star Martina Navratilova who all had exceptionally long athletic careers which, Campbell said, was due in part to their vegan diet Like Esselstyn, Campbell was raised on a farm and "went to college as a meat and potatoes guy to learn how to grow cattle. I was happy to believe that the American diet was the best in the world." But what he found was much different. In the 1950s, Campbell was part of a team of researchers who went to the Philippines to study ways to introduce more protein into the diet of malnourished children. He was initially confused why so many Filipino children were being diagnosed with liver cancer, primarily an adult disease. What he found was that the children from the more affluent families who had the most protein in their diet also had the highest incidence of liver cancer. The poorer children who had less protein had the lowest incidence of liver cancer. Campbell, who is a professor emeritus of nutritional biochemistry at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, delved deeper into the relationship between high protein diets and diseases. He presented two remarkable animal studies last night. One of the studies was done on two control groups of rats. The first group was fed a diet which was comprised of 20 percent protein. The other group was fed a diet of only five percent protein. In the first group, every one of the 30 rats developed tumors and cancers. There were none in the second group. In another two-year study of two animal groups, one was fed a diet of 20 percent protein (in this case, casein which is an experimental protein that is 87 percent cows' milk). The other group was fed a diet of five percent soy and wheat protein. After two years, all the animals on the protein-rich diet were dead. There were no casualties in the other group. Campbell's conclusion? "Cancer is a diet and lifestyle decision," he told the crowd at RunTex. "It is not a genetic event. Family history and genes do not matter." Essentially, that's what Campbell's landmark, 20-year China Study also demonstrated. He and his team of researchers studied and collected data from adults in villages all over China. After analyzing the results, Campbell summarized: "People who ate the most animal-based foods got the most chronic disease. People who favored a plant-based diet were the healthiest and avoided disease." In contrast, Campbell showed that American women are five times more likely to get breast cancer and reach menopause four years earlier than Chinese women. American men are certainly not immune. Twelve of 14 studies showed a positive association between consumption of dairy products and prostate cancer, Campbell said. "There is little question," said Campbell, "that a plant-based diet has a broad-based effect that will prevent typical American diseases such as acne, depression, Alzheimer's, kidney stones, multiple sclerosis and heart disease." Campbell then wondered aloud why, if the negative impact of too much protein in the diet and the benefits of a plant-based diet are true, we haven't heard more about it. The reason, Campbell made clear, is the food industry and its powerful lobbying efforts as well as the government's irresponsible research which is often funded by the food industry. As evidence, Campbell showed the recommendations by the Food and Nutrition Board that "to meet the body's daily nutritional needs while minimizing risk for disease, adults should consume 10-35 percent of their diet from protein." Not! It should be less than 10 percent, says Campbell. Another study, sponsored by such groups as M & Ms, the Dannon Yogurt Board and the soft drink industry, recommended that added sugars-soft and fruit drinks, pastries and candy-should comprise no more than 25 percent of total calorie consumption when it should be miniscule. Clearly the blame, Campbell said, lies with the funding of such studies and the wide dissemination which he also blames on researchers who have been bought off by the food industry. Campbell concluded his talk by admonishing the audience, "It's time we stop thinking of health coming from a pill and start thinking of health as coming from food." Indeed. FROM: http://www.runtex.com/web/1-189.asp Manoj Kunniyur <kunniyurmanoj > wrote: Om Namo Narayanaya Respected Guruvayur family members, As Savitriji and Panickerji say , let we all Guruvayurappa devotees be vegetarians. Proud to say that i became vegetarian after my membership in our group. I stopped having non veg food to show my grattitude to Bhagavan for His kind blessings. When i decided to be vegetarian everybody told me to think twice as already i was so slim when i was at home last time. They concerned that i may lack protins. But i had prayed Bhagavan and strongly decided to continue...believe it or not now my weight is inceased than earlier and i feel more healthy. I think people afraid of lacking protins while being vegetarians. It is not true. Having right vegetables and nuts give more protins than non veg. The other reason can be the unwillingness to quit the non veg taste. If we have some personal experiences where Bhagavan saved us why we should not sacrifies something for Bhagavan? "Lokame tharavad thanikkee chidikalum pulkalum puzhukkalum koodithan kudumbakkar" Hare Guruvayurappa!!! Manoj Kunniyur. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2008 Report Share Posted July 19, 2008 It is heartening to note that discussions on vegetarianism is going on without stop. Compared to other states in India, there are more non-vegetarians in Kerala. Let's make this forum as an opportunity to spread the message of vegetarianism. Vinayaraj http://proudvegetarian.blogspot.com/ guruvayur , " Jayasree Menon " <euroanuster wrote: > > Hello all non vegetarians > > If you all want to change to vegetarianism, is it not possible to switch > over to grains like Rajma, Dal, Kabuli channa are available with which > probably people are managing... Sorry if my options are not acceptable.... > > best regards > > Hare Krishna ! > > > > > 2008/7/18 vinod gopal <vinodgopalpillai: > > > > > > > Very Interesting article, i also like to use vegitable foods , but in > > middle east there is no chance to use everyday, but after read that we ll > > try to change. tks for this nice article > > > > > > > > > > --- On *Thu, 7/17/08, Udayabhanu Panickar <udhayabhanupanickar*wrote: > > > > Udayabhanu Panickar <udhayabhanupanickar > > Re: [Guruvayur] Lets be vegetarians. > > guruvayur > > Thursday, July 17, 2008, 9:32 AM > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > Here is an article on vegetarian food. Hope it is OK with the moderators. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Dr. Colin Campbell: Plant-Based Diet Is Key To Healthy Living > > by RunTex Staff, 5/19/2005 > > > > Dr. Colin Campbell: Plant-Based Diet > > Is Key To Healthy Living > > > > By Wish > > > > Dr. T. Colin Campbell, author of The China Study, presented a compelling > > (and at times, chilling) argument Wednesday night that a plant- based diet > > can virtually wipe out most of the common diseases and health risks that > > afflict millions of Americans every year. As the second guest in the RunTex > > Speaker Series, Campbell spoke before a packed house of runners, vegans and > > a handful of skeptics at RunTex. > > > > Campbell was introduced to the RunTex crowd by local triathlete Rip > > Esselstyn whose father-Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn Jr.-was the first speaker in > > the series who also espoused the key to healthy living is a plant- based > > diet. > > > > In that respect, Campbell didn't differ from Esselstyn whom he called " a > > kindred spirit. " Both men are nutritional researchers who have studied the > > dietary and nutritional customs of cultures all over the world. Their > > studies and others have concluded, according to Campbell, " That all favor a > > plant-based diet for minimal disease risk. > > > > While Esselstyn's primary interest is the positive effects of a plant-based > > diet on artery and heart disease, Campbell's presentation- It's Time to Take > > Our Food Choices Seriously-was more geared to making healthier choices > > (i.e., plant-based foods) for improved performance. He said how a vegan diet > > not only does not reduce strength, but cited two prominent studies that > > showed how it improves strength significantly. He mentioned such well-known > > vegan performance athletes as Ironman Dave Scott, two-time Olympic marathon > > Pete Pfitzinger and tennis star Martina Navratilova who all had > > exceptionally long athletic careers which, Campbell said, was due in part to > > their vegan diet > > > > Like Esselstyn, Campbell was raised on a farm and " went to college as a > > meat and potatoes guy to learn how to grow cattle. I was happy to believe > > that the American diet was the best in the world. " But what he found was > > much different. > > > > In the 1950s, Campbell was part of a team of researchers who went to the > > Philippines to study ways to introduce more protein into the diet of > > malnourished children. He was initially confused why so many Filipino > > children were being diagnosed with liver cancer, primarily an adult disease. > > > > > > What he found was that the children from the more affluent families who had > > the most protein in their diet also had the highest incidence of liver > > cancer. The poorer children who had less protein had the lowest incidence of > > liver cancer. > > > > Campbell, who is a professor emeritus of nutritional biochemistry at > > Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, delved deeper into the relationship > > between high protein diets and diseases. He presented two remarkable animal > > studies last night. > > > > One of the studies was done on two control groups of rats. The first group > > was fed a diet which was comprised of 20 percent protein. The other group > > was fed a diet of only five percent protein. In the first group, every one > > of the 30 rats developed tumors and cancers. There were none in the second > > group. > > > > In another two-year study of two animal groups, one was fed a diet of 20 > > percent protein (in this case, casein which is an experimental protein that > > is 87 percent cows' milk). The other group was fed a diet of five percent > > soy and wheat protein. > > > > After two years, all the animals on the protein-rich diet were dead. There > > were no casualties in the other group. > > > > Campbell's conclusion? " Cancer is a diet and lifestyle decision, " he told > > the crowd at RunTex. " It is not a genetic event. Family history and genes do > > not matter. " > > > > Essentially, that's what Campbell's landmark, 20-year China Study also > > demonstrated. He and his team of researchers studied and collected data from > > adults in villages all over China. After analyzing the results, Campbell > > summarized: " People who ate the most animal-based foods got the most chronic > > disease. People who favored a plant-based diet were the healthiest and > > avoided disease. " > > > > In contrast, Campbell showed that American women are five times more likely > > to get breast cancer and reach menopause four years earlier than Chinese > > women. > > > > American men are certainly not immune. Twelve of 14 studies showed a > > positive association between consumption of dairy products and prostate > > cancer, Campbell said. > > > > " There is little question, " said Campbell, " that a plant-based diet has a > > broad-based effect that will prevent typical American diseases such as acne, > > depression, Alzheimer's, kidney stones, multiple sclerosis and heart > > disease. " > > > > Campbell then wondered aloud why, if the negative impact of too much > > protein in the diet and the benefits of a plant-based diet are true, we > > haven't heard more about it. > > > > The reason, Campbell made clear, is the food industry and its powerful > > lobbying efforts as well as the government's irresponsible research which is > > often funded by the food industry. > > > > As evidence, Campbell showed the recommendations by the Food and Nutrition > > Board that " to meet the body's daily nutritional needs while minimizing risk > > for disease, adults should consume 10-35 percent of their diet from > > protein. " > > > > Not! It should be less than 10 percent, says Campbell. > > > > Another study, sponsored by such groups as M & Ms, the Dannon Yogurt Board > > and the soft drink industry, recommended that added sugars-soft and fruit > > drinks, pastries and candy-should comprise no more than 25 percent of total > > calorie consumption when it should be miniscule. > > > > Clearly the blame, Campbell said, lies with the funding of such studies and > > the wide dissemination which he also blames on researchers who have been > > bought off by the food industry. > > > > Campbell concluded his talk by admonishing the audience, " It's time we stop > > thinking of health coming from a pill and start thinking of health as coming > > from food. " > > > > Indeed. > > > > FROM: http://www.runtex. com/web/1- 189.asp<http://www.runtex.com/ web/1-189.asp> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Manoj Kunniyur <kunniyurmanoj@ >* wrote: > > > > *Om Namo Narayanaya > > * > > * Respected Guruvayur family members,* > > * * > > * As Savitriji and Panickerji say , let we all > > Guruvayurappa devotees be vegetarians. Proud to say that i became vegetarian > > after my membership in our group. I stopped having non veg food to show my > > grattitude to Bhagavan for His kind blessings. * > > ** > > * When i decided to be vegetarian everybody told me to think > > twice as already i was so slim when i was at home last time. They concerned > > that i may lack protins. But i had prayed Bhagavan and strongly decided to > > continue...believe it or not now my weight is inceased than earlier and i > > feel more healthy. * > > * * > > * I think people afraid of lacking protins while being vegetarians. > > It is not true. Having right vegetables and nuts give more protins than non > > veg. The other reason can be the unwillingness to quit the non veg taste. If > > we have some personal experiences where Bhagavan saved us why we should not > > sacrifies something for Bhagavan? * > > ** > > * " Lokame tharavad thanikkee chidikalum* > > * pulkalum puzhukkalum koodithan kudumbakkar " * > > ** > > ** > > * Hare Guruvayurappa! !!* > > ** > > ** > > * Manoj Kunniyur.* > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On *Fri, 6/27/08, Savitri Puram <savitriopuram@ gmail.com>* wrote: > > > > Savitri Puram <savitriopuram@ gmail.com> > > Re: [Guruvayur] Namasthe- Sita and parrots > > guruvayur@grou ps.com > > > > Friday, June 27, 2008, 11:58 PM > > > > Dear and respected Gopalkrishnaji, > > > > Since it was a sukhaparyavasaayi , it was really nice to read your real > > life story. The connection is amazing. I can imagine what all of you would > > have gone through when his whereabouts were unknown. > > > > I remember a story of a Nambudiri who destroyed several snake hills (pampu > > puttu) to cultivate something exotic. In that process, I think several > > snakes were killed. It seems his mother advised him not to destroy them like > > that. After a few months he was bitten by an extremely poisonous snake and > > he died before he could get any help. I was about 13 years when this > > happened. I still remember everybody talking about the curse of the snake. > > > > As small children we used to make paper boats, put small ants in the boat > > and let it flow in the rain water flowing down the steps or slopes. Whenever > > amma sees this she used to tell how sad the mother ant will feel if they > > were separated and something happens to either of them and told us not to do > > that. > > > > When things happen in the same life, and if we remember what paapam we did, > > we can try to connect. But when we get the results from past birth, we are > > unable to connect or do pariharam. Only thing karaneeyam or doable for us is > > to cause the least harm to the gross and subtle body of all creatures and > > even to plants and inanimate things. Once poet Vishnunarayanan > > Nambudiri told " Hinduism believes in living in harmony with he whole > > creation. We do not believe that God made everything on earth for us to use > > and enjoy life. That is one reason of recommending to be a vegetarian. Even > > killing plants is not desirable. But we stick to the principle of doing the > > least harm possible for our survival. This is how Hinduism is conceptually > > different from other religions. " > > > > Regards and prayers > > > > Savitri > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:51 AM, K.V Gopalakrishna <gopalakrishna. > > kv (AT) gmail (DOT) com <gopalakrishna.kv> wrote: > > > >> Dear all, > >> Radhe Krishna! > >> Beautiful story from Padma Puranam which Savitriji has told us. I shall > >> tell you my personal experience. > >> > >> Although my father was a Sanskrit scholar and written the commentary of > >> Narayaneeyam and many other stotras, it so happened that when we were living > >> in Mavelikara, somebody brought a cage containing two parrots and presented > >> to my father, and he took it. We as children were very fond of the > >> parrots, and my father trained them to talk, etc., and they used to come out > >> of the cage and sit on his hand, etc. They were so tamed. One day, one > >> of the parrots escaped and flew away and only the other remained in the > >> cage. > >> > >> My elder sister was married at the age of twelve in 1938. My B- i-l was > >> living in Burmah at that time. After the marriage, my sister was not sent > >> along with her husband as she had not attained puberty. When she attained > >> puberty at the age of 14, my b-i-l came from Burmah and she was sent along > >> with him to Burmah. And they were having a happy life, with the other > >> members of the family also present in Burmah. > >> > >> In 1942, when the Japanese occupied Burmah, all women and children were > >> asked to evacuate Burmah. My sister was one who came along with the others, > >> and stayed with us. All the other members of the family were also allowed > >> to go and they all came back, except my b-i-l who was threatened by the > >> Burmah Corporation with whom he was working, with severe punishment if he > >> attempted to go. He was stuck there in Burmah till 1945, facing the perils > >> of war, and all atrocities the Japanese committed, somehow escaping death > >> every day. His whereabouts were not known for nearly 4 years. We, > >> especially my sister were so anxious and we could not do anything else > >> other than to pray for my b-i-l's safety. My father immediately released > >> the other parrot also. > >> > >> By end of 1945, we got one letter from him that he was safe, and he came > >> back by beginning of 1946. > >> > >> My father realised that all these happened because we had kept the parrot > >> in captivity. Ever since, we learned a lesson that we should never keep > >> birds, animals, etc., in captivity. > >> > >> Regards > >> KVG. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Savitri Puram wrote: > >> > >> Dear all, > >> > >> > >> This is a story from Padma puranam. Heroine is our little Sita Devi of > >> Mithila. She was about seven years old and was playing with her friends in > >> her beautiful garden. Then two green parrots came there and started singing > >> beautifully. It was not chirping of parrots, but they were singing Ramayana > >> story as if somebody had taught them. They sang that part of the story where > >> Rama came to Mithila and married Sita by breaking Siva's bow. Songs of the > >> parrots were very clear and sweet. Sita fell in love with those parrots > >> and asked where they learnt this song and who was this Rama and > >> Sita. They said they learnt it from Valmiki Maharshi himself because they > >> stayed in the same forest. Then they explained that Sita is the little girl > >> in front of them asking questions and charming Prince Rama would come one > >> day to marry her. > >> > >> Sita requested them to stay back so that she could listen to them > >> everyday. Then the female parrot told Sita that she was pregnant and she > >> would like to go back to her own forest and would come back after > >> she delivered the children. But Sita could not resist the temptation of > >> owning her and enjoying her sweet music and did not allow her to go. Female > >> parrot was captured and was put in a beautiful cage. Sita told the female > >> parrot: " I shall release you when that charming Rama you described come and > >> marry me " . > >> > >> Male parrot also begged Sita to free his wife, but Sita told him to come > >> back later. This parrot who was pregnant was very sad to be separated from > >> her beloved husband. She refused to eat and cried and cursed Sita, " Since > >> you separated me from my beloved husband during pregnancy, you also will > >> have to experience the same fate " . > >> > >> Having spoken thus the miserable female parrot uttered Rama naamam and > >> died. Seeing this the male parrot was extremely sad and distressed and fell > >> in to the Ganga and drowned himself. His last words were : " You killed my > >> beautiful pregnant wife by separating her from me. I will take janma in > >> Ayodhya and will cause your separation from your husband during your > >> pregnancy " . > >> > >> Later Rama married Sita. Ravana kidnapped her and Rama defeated Ravana and > >> brought her back to Ayodhya. This male parrot was born as Krodhan, the > >> washerman in Ayodhya and because of his harsh words Sita was exiled to the > >> forest. Sita was pregnant at that time and she had to face separation from > >> her husband living alone in the forest. Padma purana says that everybody has > >> to experience the results of each and every karma we do. Either the results > >> will be experienced in the same janma or in the subsequent janmaas. > >> > >> Rama and Sita being Purusha and Prakrithi, acted as if they were going > >> through the suffering to show us that karmaphalam will always follow karmam. > >> This story tells us to be considerate to other fellow creatures' feelings > >> and pain. > >> > >> According to Njaanaananda Saraswathi Sukritham and Dushkritham are like > >> bouncing balls. If we throw the ball of sukrutham, only the ball of > >> sukrutham will bounce back. If we throw ball of Dushkrutham, only ball of > >> dushkrutham will bounce back. But what about the balls of dushkruthum that > >> we threw in the previous janmaas? We do not know how many balls we played > >> with. Scriptures say, sankeerthanam and satsangam will change the direction > >> of the ball of dushkrutham or at least lessen the force with which it will > >> bounce back on us. > >> > >> Regards and prayers > >> > >> savitri > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Udayabhanu Panickar > > aum namahh Shivaaya > > > > OUR BODY IS THE ABODE OF THE JEEVATMAN, WHICH IS IN FACT THE PARABRAHMAN. > > LET US NOT MAKE IT A GRAVEYARD. LET US NOT EAT FLESH. LET US BE VEGETARIANS > > AND STAY HEALTHY. Chattampi Swamikal said that animals are to be loved, > > not eaten. Eating flesh is good neither for the mind nor for the intellect, > > not even for the body. It distorts the basic character of human. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Best regards > > Jayasree Menon > Bangalore > +9900149461 > -- ------------ > A well-thought out plan, execution excellence, market timing, personal > leadership are drivers of the growth trajectory. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.