Guest guest Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 pls bless us on ur birth day--- On Mon, 7/7/08, NB Nair <nbnair2000 wrote:NB Nair <nbnair2000[Guruvayur] Re: Sita and parrots – Lets be vegetarians. alternate email id - correctionguruvayur Date: Monday, 7 July, 2008, 1:21 PM HARI AUM Kindly note a correction in my alternate email id. It is nbnair (AT) gmail (DOT) com [nbnair(@)gmail. com]. Regards, NB Nair. guruvayur@grou ps.com, "NB Nair" <nbnair2000@ ...> wrote: > > HARI AUM > > > Sub: It was my mistake – my sincere apology to my fellow devotees. > > Dear Shri Vinayaraj and Shri Manoj Kunniyur > > The confusion/ misunderstanding created was solely due to my mistake/ > carelessness. Both of you had reasons to feel bad about it. I should > have been more careful while quoting your opinions. My unconditional > apologies for, the same, to both of you. There should not be any ill > will created between two Guruvayur Devotees (because of my > carelessness) . I considered these discussions only as issue-based and > not personality based: and in such a case I should not have made a > miss-quoting! > > Today is my birth day, the 72nd one. If you two are convinced of my > point and you send me emails (to nbair > <nbair@ ... – nbnair(@)gmail. com - as I don't > want the Guruvayur Group to be unnecessarily crowded) stating that you > don't have any ill will between you, I will consider those as the > most cherished BirthDay Presents. > > Regards, NB Nair. > > guruvayur@grou ps.com, Manoj Kunniyur kunniyurmanoj@ > wrote: > > > > Om Namo Narayanaya > > > > Dear Shri Vinayaraj, > > > > Thank you for the msg. I was just mentioning that a statement > attributed to my name was not from my side. Lets dont discuss about this > subject anymore in the group. > > > > Hare Guruvayurappa. > > > > Manoj Kunniyur. > > --- On Sun, 7/6/08, Vinayaraj V R vinayarajvr@ wrote: > > > > Vinayaraj V R vinayarajvr@ > > Re: [Guruvayur] Re: Sita and parrots â€" Lets be > vegetarians. . > > guruvayur@grou ps.com > > Sunday, July 6, 2008, 5:10 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Manoj > > > > It is easy to blame the circumstances and find many excuses. > > > > But > > > > "chiththam chalippathine hEthu muthirnnunilkkE > > nechchil kulukkamillaaththav anaaNu dheeran" > > > > Brave are those who won't fail when there are > > reasons for the mind to aflutter. > > > > > > regards > > Vinayaraj > > > > > > --- On Sun, 7/6/08, Manoj Kunniyur <kunniyurmanoj@ > wrote: > > > > Manoj Kunniyur <kunniyurmanoj@ > > > Re: [Guruvayur] Re: Sita and parrots â€" Lets be > vegetarians. . > > guruvayur@grou ps.com > > Sunday, July 6, 2008, 12:27 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Om Namo Narayanaya > >  > >     Dear Shri Nairji, > >  > >           Thank you for the > message. I would like to point you out that the satement you quoted in > your message as mine was not right ("all who believe in Lord Krishna > should be pure vegetarians irrespective of their caste or creed") . If i > am right it was Shri Vinayaraj´s. Let me humbly disagree with > you that the travellers can be found it difficult to be vegetarians. > >  > >               >            Respectfully > >  > >               >               >      Manoj Kunniyur. > >  > >  > >  > > > > > > --- On Fri, 7/4/08, NB Nair nbnair2000 > wrote: > > > > NB Nair nbnair2000 > > > [Guruvayur] Re: Sita and parrots â€" Lets be > vegetarians. > > guruvayur@grou ps.com > > Friday, July 4, 2008, 8:54 AM > > > > > > > > > > HARI AUM > > Sub: Sita and parrots â€" Vegetarianism > > It is heartening to note that Smt Savitri Puram's inspirational story, > "Sita and Parrots" is leading our esteemed Guruvayur Group family to do > a lot of introspection on the various aspects True Devotion to > Kannan! It is all His Blessings to the Group! > > Out of the various topics of discussion under this, let me present a > few humble points on vegetarianism. I am personally convinced that > vegetarianism is good on many accounts. I was born and brought up > in a non-vegetarian family and lived up to about 50 years as such. Then > over a period of a couple of years I slowly changed over to be a pure > vegetarian, for no apparent external reasons. And now for the past > two decades I am a pure veg and very enthusiastic in propagating > vegetarianism, as I am personally convinced of its merits.  > > I used to notice Shri Udayabhanu Panickar's inspiring message on > vegetarianism under his signature in his posts. Also, I do fully > agree with the views put forward by M/S Jayasree Menon, Shri Dasan, and > others on the topic. > > Shri Manoj Kunniyurji, you had presented the issue with good > appeal. I know that the poem you had quoted is not yours, or else > as a fellow devotee, I would have earnestly requested you to add > "Kompananakalum" in that, at least after "Puzhukkalum" , to represent > those 60+ all male hapless elephants of Punnathur Ana Kota. > > The sight of cattle being transported in lorries and on foot by road > in Kerala should make any Keralite - veg or non-veg - hang his head in > shame.  I had traveled through the length and breadth of India and > also lived for 35 years with in a few kilometers of a major abattoir in > Bombay : but never, never had seen such horrible sights! What I had seen > during a road journey from Palakkad to Ernakulam on a summer day, a few > years back still haunts me! I was told "It is how live-meat flows > from TN to Kerala! > > However, I find it difficult to agree with Shri Manoj's view "all who > believe in Lord Krishna should be pure vegetarians irrespective of their > caste or creed".  In the first place how can any one prescribe a > minimum qualification for a devotee? Also, our devotion to > Guruvayurappan should not divide our Guruvayur Group in any way. We > can advocate vegetarianism but how could we insist on it? Let us > leave the choice of food habits of people to themselves. > > In fact I don't insist on my children or grand children to be strict > vegs. Who knows if they have to travel the world over tomorrow they > may find it a problem. There are many pure vegs settled the world > over. But for casual travelers the case is different. The > plight of a pure veg nascent traveler may not be any thing better than > that of a person used only to Indian style WCs or 'open air comfort > stations' during such travels! > > Moreover, until I read Shri Kamalesh's reply post â€" GoMata - , > I was feeling great, having had become a veg. He had shown to us > that "killing of those cows right away will be better for them than > postponing it (the killing) till their old age and torturing to exploit > them in the mean time for our milk." Then in what way we who take that > milk are better than the non-vegs? > > Our irshies and saints had advocated vegetarianism for centuries. > No one can change the world over night. We should also say our > frank opinion - I believe that is our Niyuktha Karma. Do it > sincerely and boldly, but don't insist on the results - its bhala.  > It may take its own time for the changes. We need not feel angry or > frustrated on that account. Also, we should not stop our campaign: > we should keep on talking as and when required. That is again, my > understanding of Gita II-47.. > > With Regards to all my fellow devotees, > > Yours Sincerely, NB Nair. > >  > > guruvayur@grou ps.com, Manoj Kunniyur <kunniyurmanoj@ .....> > wrote: > > > > > > Om Namo Narayanaya > > > > > > Respected Guruvayur family members, > > > > > > As Savitriji and Panickerji say , let we all Guruvayurappa devotees > be vegetarians. Proud to say that i became vegetarian after my > membership in our group. I stopped having non veg food to show my > grattitude to Bhagavan for His kind blessings. > > > > > > When i decided to be vegetarian everybody told me to think twice as > already i was so slim when i was at home last time. They concerned that > i may lack protins. But i had prayed Bhagavan and strongly decided to > continue...believe it or not now my weight is inceased than earlier and > i feel more healthy. > > > > > > I think people afraid of lacking protins while being vegetarians. It > is not true. Having right vegetables and nuts give more protins than non > veg. The other reason can be the unwillingness to quit the non veg > taste. If we have some personal experiences where Bhagavan saved us why > we should not sacrifies something for Bhagavan? > > > > > > "Lokame tharavad thanikkee chidikalum > > > pulkalum puzhukkalum koodithan kudumbakkar" > > > > > > > > > Hare Guruvayurappa! !! > > > > > > > > > Manoj Kunniyur. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 6/27/08, Savitri Puram savitriopuram@ ... wrote: > > > > > > Savitri Puram savitriopuram@ ... > > > Re: [Guruvayur] Namasthe- Sita and parrots > > > guruvayur@grou ps.com > > > Friday, June 27, 2008, 11:58 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear and respected Gopalkrishnaji, > > > > > > Since it was a sukhaparyavasaayi , it was really nice to read your > real life story. The connection is amazing. I can imagine what all of > you would have gone through when his whereabouts were unknown. > > > > > > I remember a story of a Nambudiri who destroyed several snake hills > (pampu puttu) to cultivate something exotic. In that process, I think > several snakes were killed. It seems his mother advised him not to > destroy them like that. After a few months he was bitten by an extremely > poisonous snake and he died before he could get any help. I was about 13 > years when this happened. I still remember everybody talking about the > curse of the snake. > > > > > > As small children we used to make paper boats, put small ants in the > boat and let it flow in the rain water flowing down the steps or slopes. > Whenever amma sees this she used to tell how sad the mother ant will > feel if they were separated and something happens to either of them and > told us not to do that. > > > > > > When things happen in the same life, and if we remember what paapam > we did, we can try to connect. But when we get the results from past > birth, we are unable to connect or do pariharam. Only thing karaneeyam > or doable for us is to cause the least harm to the gross and subtle body > of all creatures and even to plants and inanimate things. Once poet > Vishnunarayanan Nambudiri told" Hinduism believes in living in harmony > with he whole creation. We do not believe that God made everything on > earth for us to use and enjoy life. That is one reason of recommending > to be a vegetarian. Even killing plants is not desirable. But we stick > to the principle of doing the least harm possible for our survival. This > is how Hinduism is conceptually different from other religions." > > > > > > Regards and prayers > > > > > > Savitri > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:51 AM, K.V Gopalakrishna <gopalakrishna. > kv (AT) gmail (DOT) . com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > Radhe Krishna! > > > Beautiful story from Padma Puranam which Savitriji has told us. I > shall tell you my personal experience. > > > > > > Although my father was a Sanskrit scholar and written the commentary > of Narayaneeyam and many other stotras, it so happened that when we were > living in Mavelikara, somebody brought a cage containing two parrots and > presented to my father, and he took it. We as children were very fond of > the parrots, and my father trained them to talk, etc., and they used to > come out of the cage and sit on his hand, etc. They were so tamed. One > day, one of the parrots escaped and flew away and only the other > remained in the cage. > > > > > > My elder sister was married at the age of twelve in 1938. My B-i-l > was living in Burmah at that time. After the marriage, my sister was not > sent along with her husband as she had not attained puberty. When she > attained puberty at the age of 14, my b-i-l came from Burmah and she was > sent along with him to Burmah. And they were having a happy life, with > the other members of the family also present in Burmah. > > > > > > In 1942, when the Japanese occupied Burmah, all women and children > were asked to evacuate Burmah. My sister was one who came along with the > others, and stayed with us. All the other members of the family were > also allowed to go and they all came back, except my b-i-l who was > threatened by the Burmah Corporation with whom he was working, with > severe punishment if he attempted to go. He was stuck there in Burmah > till 1945, facing the perils of war, and all atrocities the Japanese > committed, somehow escaping death every day. His whereabouts were not > known for nearly 4 years. We, especially my sister were so anxious and > we could not do anything else other than to pray for my b-i-l's safety. > My father immediately released the other parrot also.. > > > > > > By end of 1945, we got one letter from him that he was safe, and he > came back by beginning of 1946. > > > > > > My father realised that all these happened because we had kept the > parrot in captivity. Ever since, we learned a lesson that we should > never keep birds, animals, etc., in captivity. > > > > > > Regards > > > KVG. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Savitri Puram wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > > > > This is a story from Padma puranam. Heroine is our little Sita Devi > of Mithila. She was about seven years old and was playing with her > friends in her beautiful garden. Then two green parrots came there and > started singing beautifully. It was not chirping of parrots, but they > were singing Ramayana story as if somebody had taught them. They sang > that part of the story where Rama came to Mithila and married Sita by > breaking Siva's bow. Songs of the parrots were very clear and sweet. > Sita fell in love with those parrots and asked where they learnt this > song and who was this Rama and Sita. They said they learnt it from > Valmiki Maharshi himself because they stayed in the same forest. Then > they explained that Sita is the little girl in front of them asking > questions and charming Prince Rama would come one day to marry her. > > > > > > Sita requested them to stay back so that she could listen to them > everyday. Then the female parrot told Sita that she was pregnant and she > would like to go back to her own forest and would come back after she > delivered the children. But Sita could not resist the temptation of > owning her and enjoying her sweet music and did not allow her to go. > Female parrot was captured and was put in a beautiful cage. Sita told > the female parrot: " I shall release you when that charming Rama you > described come and marry me". > > > > > > Male parrot also begged Sita to free his wife, but Sita told him to > come back later. This parrot who was pregnant was very sad to be > separated from her beloved husband. She refused to eat and cried and > cursed Sita, "Since you separated me from my beloved husband during > pregnancy, you also will have to experience the same fate" . > > > > > > Having spoken thus the miserable female parrot uttered Rama naamam > and died.. Seeing this the male parrot was extremely sad and distressed > and fell in to the Ganga and drowned himself. His last words were : "You > killed my beautiful pregnant wife by separating her from me. I will take > janma in Ayodhya and will cause your separation from your husband during > your pregnancy".. > > > > > > Later Rama married Sita. Ravana kidnapped her and Rama defeated > Ravana and brought her back to Ayodhya. This male parrot was born as > Krodhan, the washerman in Ayodhya and because of his harsh words Sita > was exiled to the forest. Sita was pregnant at that time and she had to > face separation from her husband living alone in the forest. Padma > purana says that everybody has to experience the results of each and > every karma we do. Either the results will be experienced in the same > janma or in the subsequent janmaas. > > > > > > Rama and Sita being Purusha and Prakrithi, acted as if they were > going through the suffering to show us that karmaphalam will always > follow karmam. This story tells us to be considerate to other fellow > creatures' feelings and pain. > > > > > > According to Njaanaananda Saraswathi Sukritham and Dushkritham are > like bouncing balls. If we throw the ball of sukrutham, only the ball of > sukrutham will bounce back. If we throw ball of Dushkrutham, only ball > of dushkrutham will bounce back. But what about the balls of dushkruthum > that we threw in the previous janmaas? We do not know how many balls we > played with. Scriptures say, sankeerthanam and satsangam will change the > direction of the ball of dushkrutham or at least lessen the force with > which it will bounce back on us. > > > > > > Regards and prayers > > > > > > savitri > > > > > > Save all your chat conversations. Find them online. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.