Guest guest Posted May 12, 2009 Report Share Posted May 12, 2009 Dear all, Suka Maharshi hardly ever mentioned Radha's name in Bhagavatham. She was just one of the Gopikas. It is said that there are two reasons for Suka maharshi not to mention the name of Radha Devi in Bhagavatham. 1. Radha is contained in each name of Krishna and there is no need to mention the name of the inseparable Shakthi of Krishna. 2. Whenever Suka maharshi thought or mentioned the name of Radha Devi, his Bhakthi for Radha Devi took him immediately to the stage of samadhi and he could not continue the stories of Bhagavathm to King Parikshit. King Parikshit was very eager to hear them and he had only 7 days left in his life. So Suka Maharshi decided not to mention the name of Radha Devi throughout his Bhagavatham discourse to King Parikshit! Gargabhagavatham illustrates the divine relationship with more examples: 11. If Krishna is Siva, Radha is Parvathi 12. If Krishna is Vishnu, Radha is Lakshmi 13. When Krishna is Varaham (boar) , Radha is Vasudha (bhoomi) 14. If Krishna is Kapila, Radha is Siddhi 15. If Krishna is Datthaathreyan, Radha is Jnaanam 16 If Krishna is Dhanwanthari, Radha is Divyasudha (Amritham) 17. When Krishna became Rama, Radha became Sita. 18. When Krishna is Emperor Prithu, Radha is Archiss 19. When Krishna is Vedavyasan, Radha is Vedaantham 20. When Krishna became Nandagopaputra, Radha became Vrishabhanuputhri It is interesting to note that most of the words representing Radha is contained in the corresponding words representing Krishna. parasparam sandhita vigrahaabyaam namo yuvaabhyaam Hari Raadhikaabhyaam Regards and prayers Savitri Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.