Guest guest Posted January 27, 2010 Report Share Posted January 27, 2010 9.karmodhaye karmaphalaanuraagaaH thathra anuyaanthi na haranthi mrthyum sadharTha yogaanavagathaath samanthaath pravarthathe bhogayogena dhehee Sanatkumara explains how the ignorant revolve in the cycle of birth and death. Those who are desirous of the fruit of action, do the karma and get the result and hence they do not cross over death,. That is, they keep dying and coming back. They get attached to the sensual pleasures because they do not have the knowledge of the identity of the self with `sath,' Brahman, but identify the self with the body only. The knowledge of the unity of the self with Brahman alone makes one detached from the fruits of action. Ignorance of this truth creates dhehaathma budDhi, the notion that `I am the body,' instead of the awareness that `I am the Supreme Self.' Hence the ignorant are carried away by the senses with their minds running after the senses enjoying the sense objects. Thus the karma done by them with expectation of result creates more attachment and induces more karma as a result of which they have to undergo endless births, which means that they have to die and born again. Therefore Sanatkumara says that they have not transcended death. Like a blind man who rushes headlong without knowing the pitfalls in front, those who are ignorant of their real identity, rush towards birth and death continuously and suffer the ills of the samsara. The wise who are aware of the identity of their self with Brahman, on the other hand, conquer death because they are free from the bondage of karma and do not enter into the cycle of birth and death anymore. In advaita, the term sadharTha yoga the unity with `sath,' Brahman is absolute while in Visishtadvaita it is one of inseparable relation, aprThak sidDhi of sareerasareeribhava, as between the body and the soul, Brahman being the inner self of all which form His sareera. I am explaining this both in terms of advait and visisghtadvaia because santsujatheeya occurs in the Mahabharatha which extols the value of bhakthi besides dharma and the Brahman or `sath' of the Upanishads is taken as attributeless by the advaita of Sankara, whose commentary on this work alone is known. But Brahman of visishtadvaita synonymous with Narayana, is the inner self of the individual self which forms the body of Brahman. The term maya has different connotation in advaita and visishtadvaita which we shall see in the next sloka. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.