Guest guest Posted March 31, 2010 Report Share Posted March 31, 2010 29. Import of sruti texts continued 3. sadheva soumya idham agra aaseeth "sadheva soumya idham agra aaseeth ekameva adhvitheeyam," ithyathra "sadheva", "ekameva,"ithi avaDhaaraNadhvayena, "adhvitheeyam" ithyanenacha sanmaathraathireki sajaatheeyavijaatheeyaaH, sarve viSeshaaH nishiDhyantha ithi pratheeyathe ithi cheth, naithadhevam. Ramanuja now examines another text from sadhvidhya, namely "sadheva soumya idham agra aaseeth ekam eva adhvitheeyam", meaning, sath alone existed in the beginning one only without a second, and explains the terms. He rejects the contention that the terms sadheva, ekam eva, and adhvitheeyam, negate all else, sajaatheeya and vijaatheeya apart from the pure Being. The opponent argues that the terms, sath, the pure Being existed alone eva idham agra aaseeth, ekam eva without a second , adhvitheeyam, negate all entities otjher than Brahman, both similar, sajaatheeya and different, vijaatheeya. That is by saying sath only the existence of any other entity is negated, ekam eva negates any other similar entity and adhvitheeyam negates any other entity different from it. Ramanuja refutes this saying naithadhevam, it is not so Kaaryakaaranabhaava avasThaa dhvayaavasThithasya ekasya vasthunaH ekaavasThasya jnaanena avasThaanthara avasThithasyaapi vasthvaikyena jnaathathaam dhrshtaanthena dharSayithvaa,Svethakethoh aprajnaatham sarvasya brahmakaaraNathvam vakthum " sadheva soumya idham" ithyaarabDham." It means that when the one entity which is the cause is entering into another state as the effect, the knowledge of both as the cause and the effect gives the understanding that both are the same entity. This is illustrated by the example of mud and its effects. Thus to Svethakethu who was ignorant of the truth that Brahman is the cause of all, the instruction starts with the statement "sadheva soumya idham agra aaseeth." "idham agre sadheva aaseeth" ithi. agra ithi kaala viseshaH. idham Sabdhavaachyasya prapanchasya sadhaapatthiroopaam kriyaam,sathdhravyathaam cha vadhathi. "ekameva"ithi cha asya naanaa naama roopa vikaara prahaaNam.ethasmin prathipaadhithe asya jagathaH sadhupaadhaanathaa prathipaadhithaa bhavathi.anyathra upaadhaanakaaranasya svayathirikthaaDhshtaathrapekshaadharsane api sarvavilakshaNathvaath asya sarvajnasya brahmaNaH sarva sakthiyogaH na virudDha ithi, adhviitheeya padham aDhishaathrantharamnivaarayathi.sarvasakthiyukthathvaadheva brahmaNah kaaschana SruthayH praThamam upaadhaana kaaraNathvam prathipaadhya, nimitthakaaraNam api thadheva ithi prathipaadhayanthi, yaTheyam sruthiH. Ramanuja now explains the terms. "idham agre sadheva aaseeth" ithi. agra ithi kaala viseshaH. idham Sabdhavaachyasya prapanchasya sadhaapatthiroopaam kriyaam,sathdhravyathaam cha vadhathi. In the statement , "idham agre sadheva aaseeth, sath only was this, in the beginning, the word agre denotes a specific period of time. It refers to the world, denoted by idham, this, which is the effect, kaarya, of sath, Brahman, the dhravya, like the mud,which is the cause. In simple words, it means that the world idham was sath only in the beginning from which it follows that the world. "ekameva"ithi cha asya naanaa naama roopa vikaara prahaaNam ekameva, one only denotes that the various names and forms, which were not existent in the beginning. ethasmin prathipaadhithe asya jagathaH sadhupaadhaanathaa prathipaadhithaa bhavathi. when this is affirmed the sath or Brhaman is known as the material cause of this world. anyathra upaadhaanakaaranasya svavyathiriktha aDhshtaathrapekshaa dharsane api In other instances material cause is known to depend on another efficient cause. That is, clay being the material cause of pot it cannot create the pot without an efficient cause, namely the potter. sarvavilakshaNathvaath asya sarvajnasya brahmaNaH sarva sakthiyogaH na virudDha ithi, adhviitheeya padham aDhishaathrantharam nivaarayathi But with reference to Brahman the term adhvitheeyam negates any other efficient couse and this is not contrary to the usual concept of the material casue and efficient cause being different because Brahman is unlike all else being one only without a second and is omniscient and omnipotent. sarvasakthiyukthathvaadheva brahmaNah kaaschana SruthayaH praThamam upaadhaana kaaraNathvam prathipaadhya, nimitthakaaraNam api thadheva ithi prathipaadhayanthi, yaTheyam sruthiH. Based on the omnipotence of Brahman, some texts denote Brahman as the material cause at first and subsequently state that Brahman is the efficient cause.This text also does the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.