Guest guest Posted October 31, 2006 Report Share Posted October 31, 2006 Jai Shri Krishna In the Bhagwad Gita it has been written that an Atma takes birth in different yonies according to its past karmas. Some atmas, having done good deeds may be entitled to take birth as human beings. The question here is that due to adoption of family planning programmes, an atma is not given an opportunity to take birth as a human being. Then where do these atmas that are entitled to human birth go under these circumstances? Are these types of deeds such as family planning an interference in the work of God? or have we (human beings) become more powerful than God? One Sadak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 8, 2006 Report Share Posted November 8, 2006 Dear Purushottamji, Gita doesn't say Atma takes birth, rather it says It is free from birth and death. As I understand, what takes birth is subtle body - Antakaranah - mind-intellect-ego stuff - vasanayukta sukshma sharir sustained by Atma like space would sustain objects but remain untouched by them. Atma is One without a second so there is no question of many atmas. Atma is not doing any karmas; karmas are done in Its Presence as their Witness (so to speak)! Ego falsely identifies with these karmas and assumes doership in ignorance of its true nature. This ignorance continues as cycle of birth and death until Self-knowledge takes place thru divine souls like Swami Ramsukhdasji! Atma is eternal Being(sat-chit-ananda) and doesn't need body(as evidenced by deep sleep in which body-mind is not even there) rather body needs It for its existence. Atma which is impersonal, not yours or mine, but universal(Brahman or GOD)! I am sorry if I have overwhelmed anyone but that's how I see it! One must pursue inquiry into Atma with the help of self realized One and scriptures!.... Sadhak , purushottam maheshwari <pd_maheshwari wrote: > > Jai Shri Krishna > > In the Bhagwad Gita it has been written that a Atma take the birth in different yonies according to its past karma. Some of the atma might have done good deed and were entitled to take birth as human being but due to adoption of family planning programmes they can not take birth as human being. > > Then where these atma goes. and whether this deed of family planning is interference in the work of god or human being has become more powerful than the God. > > One Sadak > > > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2006 Report Share Posted November 9, 2006 If every birth is determined by the past karma, which karma caused the first birth? On 10/31/06, purushottam maheshwari <pd_maheshwari wrote: Jai Shri Krishna In the Bhagwad Gita it has been written that an Atma takes birth in different yonies according to its past karmas. Some atmas, having done good deeds may be entitled to take birth as human beings. The question here is that due to adoption of family planning programmes, an atma is not given an opportunity to take birth as a human being. Then where do these atmas that are entitled to human birth go under these circumstances? Are these types of deeds such as family planning an interference in the work of God? or have we (human beings) become more powerful than God? One Sadak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 11, 2006 Report Share Posted November 11, 2006 Dear all, This is an faq which many people have asked in the past. Which was born first, the mango or the mango tree/-- or, which was born first, the hen or the egg ? According to the theory of evolution in which Hindus believe, the very first persons were the Sanat-kumaras, who were the Manasa-putras (progenies which came out of the mind) of the Creator, Brahma. They were asked by the Creator to assist him in creative work, but they walked off saying that they were not interested in it and went away to perform Tapas (penance) and service of the Lord. When this disobedience was regarded as serious.by the Creator Brahma, he waqs overcome by anger and his anger came out in the form of Rudra, who, right on birth, started crying, and asking for place to live, name etc. This was granted and Rudra was given 11 forms, 11 names, 11 abodes to live and 11 wives to perform procreation work. Rudra created beings just like him, black, ugly-looking with matted hair and what not. When the creator Brahma saw them, He was feeling sorry that he made a mistake of asking Rudra to procreate, and he created beings similar to him. Brahma got worried that if Rudras asked to continue the work, he would fill up the universe with all ugly creatures. Hence he stopped Rudra from the creative work, and requested him to go on Tapas or meditation. Then it is said that much thought was given by the creator how the creative activity would be done in future using the mode of marital Dharma, and Brahma divided himself into two, one male (Swayambhuva Manu) and a female, (Satarupa). These two entities (Adam and Eve) were the first ones who started the creative activity and procreated five childrem. As there was no fruits of action (Karama-phalam) at that time, they were all created as good people with no bad qualities. People started getting different qualities based on the preponderance of the three Gunas or modes of the primordial nature, Sattva, Rajas and Tamas. So actions and fruits thereof, came into being only later. Love K.V. Gopalakrishna. Anup Wadhwa wrote: If every birth is determined by the past karma, which karma caused the first birth? On 10/31/06, purushottam maheshwari <pd_maheshwari > wrote: Jai Shri Krishna In the Bhagwad Gita it has been written that an Atma takes birth in different yonies according to its past karmas. Some atmas, having done good deeds may be entitled to take birth as human beings. The question here is that due to adoption of family planning programmes, an atma is not given an opportunity to take birth as a human being. Then where do these atmas that are entitled to human birth go under these circumstances? Are these types of deeds such as family planning an interference in the work of God? or have we (human beings) become more powerful than God? One Sadak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 11, 2006 Report Share Posted November 11, 2006 A topic beyond human comprehension. Family planning. Suppose (for the sake of argument) all people decide not to marry and remain as Brahmacharis, and hence the creative activity among human beings comes to a standstill, what will happen to all the souls which are qualified to re-incarnate as human beings? It is the job of the Creator who dispenses justice to give an appropriate body to every soul, depending upon the Karma of each individual soul, after it ceases its mundane existence! All actions including family planning, are performed, as ordained by the inscrutable Lord. Why should man worry about God's job--He may have some better plans for that soul! Love K.V. Gopalakrishna purushottam maheshwari wrote: Jai Shri Krishna In the Bhagwad Gita it has been written that an Atma takes birth in different yonies according to its past karmas. Some atmas, having done good deeds may be entitled to take birth as human beings. The question here is that due to adoption of family planning programmes, an atma is not given an opportunity to take birth as a human being. Then where do these atmas that are entitled to human birth go under these circumstances? Are these types of deeds such as family planning an interference in the work of God? or have we (human beings) become more powerful than God? One Sadak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 11, 2006 Report Share Posted November 11, 2006 Dear Souls, The law of karma is very difficult to understand in all its intricacies. Its dispensation is in the hands of the ´¨paramesvara¨¨. Yet, as there is the general rule that for every action lies an equal an opposite reaction. Thus for one who stops the birth of a child either by abortion or contraception we should expect a similar reaction to address those involved in the next life. Thus, the child who is aborted by submission to the codes of family planning, may only be receiving the reaction for what crime he was an accomplice to in the previous life. Avadhoot "K.V Gopalakrishna" <gopalakrishna.kv wrote: A topic beyond human comprehension. Family planning. Suppose (for the sake of argument) all people decide not to marry and remain as Brahmacharis, and hence the creative activity among human beings comes to a standstill, what will happen to all the souls which are qualified to re-incarnate as human beings? It is the job of the Creator who dispenses justice to give an appropriate body to every soul, depending upon the Karma of each individual soul, after it ceases its mundane existence! All actions including family planning, are performed, as ordained by the inscrutable Lord. Why should man worry about God's job--He may have some better plans for that soul! LoveK.V. Gopalakrishnapurushottam maheshwari wrote: Jai Shri Krishna In the Bhagwad Gita it has been written that an Atma takes birth in different yonies according to its past karmas. Some atmas, having done good deeds may be entitled to take birth as human beings. The question here is that due to adoption of family planning programmes, an atma is not given an opportunity to take birth as a human being. Then where do these atmas that are entitled to human birth go under these circumstances? Are these types of deeds such as family planning an interference in the work of God? or have we (human beings) become more powerful than God? One Sadak Want to start your own business? Learn how on Small Business. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.