Guest guest Posted January 1, 2009 Report Share Posted January 1, 2009 Dear Sadhak Community (1) Is the purpose of this forum only to discuss the meaning behind Gita slokas? and / or (2) interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life? (By practical life, I mean one living the normal life while in the quest for God, Gita does not shun the karma, but the attachment towards it) While I understand both are important, Gita is directing its readers like us to grow from Tatwa vaadibhi (one who reads and discusses about the essential element) to tatva darsibhi (one who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat'). I am particularly and practically interested in this transition, because some of the comments from my fellow sadhaks like 'then the soul leaves the body','everything has nothing, while nothing has every thing' while the same people are also suggesting 'no one may have seen God' 'Tatvadarsibhi' (who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat') is referred in Gita 2:16 of Sankhya Yoga. Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' here. Let me know your views on the transition. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- NEW POSTING Dear Sadhakas, Namaste! I have been thinking on the same line( as response to BG 8:3 & 4 or stand alone) to bring in more emphasis in our posts that will bring changes in us - transition the teaching of Gita or any authentic teachings into reality as Venuji has said here! We have had several nice posts explaining the BG Ch 8:3 & 4 and 2:16 recently. What is the relationship of that Brahman, the Imperishable, That ISNESS to I, Adhyatman, Adhibhutas etc.? Unless we experience, and as a result change, it is of little use, we would think. Brahman may look out of reach, far away! As I see there is no substitute for deep understanding which comes from looking at inner experience as we read or hear spiritual discourses. In otherwords, we can receive information on such matters and we can say " ok I know, I am embodied soul or Existence/Sat " just as we know Delhi is north-East to Mumbai. This works in the objective world, but I don't think it will work in the field we are dealing on this platform as we have to rise beyond mind. We need to discover experientially we are Consciousness, by knowing what Consciousness means, in the first place! My humble suggestion would be to see, feel deeply those words of wisdom, let them resonate in our consciousness or awareness, in our silence, long enough! They will convey some understanding based on experience that is your own, if mind opens up to receive! When such power ladden words merge in silence they take " us " in Divine Presence! It is important not to push away such intimations by saying " no, its not according to such and such... " . At this point I would stop here to hit this point which I have found very helpful in all my pursuits. Everything we hear or read from Realized ones like Swamiji, we need to translate them in our own ways of putting it in practice in order to say we have understood them. It is clarity that speaks through us, not " an informed person " who impersonates us! More on the subject later! Namaskar.......Pratap Bhatt ------------------------------ Hari Om The Q of Venuji had two facets. One re the object of this Satsanga Forum. While I am not in any way a Founder of this Forum but as I see there is a common thread binding all Sadhaks - Swamiji Shri Ramsukhdasji Maharaj and Holy Gita. The sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal- beyond all faiths and religions- covering humanity at large. This forum is in my view at present " evolving " and the deliberations are getting divine and divine. We , in fact, can easily state that we are part of a Jnana Yagya within the meaning of Holy Gita. Hence I don't see any limitations on the scope of this forum. Since Holy Gita encompasses entire humanity , both principles and practice of ideal human conduct - I see nothing wrong in our addressing any type of problems faced by Sadhaks in their spiritual journey. All my personal views as one of the many Sadhaks of this divine group. Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Dear all , Yes , if we can implement the teachings of gita , in our day to day living , not only will it make life Less stressful , but more meaningful . After all we live in our communities and mingle / work / interact, so i Feel as long as we understand The true meaning (spirit of the message ) of the message sought to be Conveyed by the gita and try & Impact the same in our lives , things will be much better . In short ,what we want to be is better human beings , because only than can we be better Parents / children / friends / spouses /sadhaks / teachers/ Rgds Arvind Malhotra ---------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The very existence is " SAT " . Those who have experienced the characteristics of " SAT " and ever changing function of nature- " ASAT " , they in practice experience " their obvious , self proven, natural, automatic positioning in the existence viz SAT . In their experience there is nothing known as ASAT existing. In other words in their experience only SAT is existing- nothing else is existing. Such great people are called " tattva darshibhih " . In their experience only their positioning in SAT- imperishable, permanent, ever present existence- remains. Through that positioning they get highest rewards. In BG 2:16- the term " ubhayorapi " - represents " conscience " ! " Antah " - represents " element knowledge " !! " Drishtah " - represents " experience " !!! Meaning thereby that " conscience has transformed ( " transition " term as used by the questioner) in to the experiential knowledge and now what has remained is SAT - existence only! This is the highest state of Jnana Yoga!! The Highest reward! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16). Swamiji has been very clear about this... " Real " (Sat) is our natural state. Natural is what needs no effort. It is ever attained. It simply IS. Be situate in it. The essence (Real) is always there - will always be there. The real is not created. The unreal is created from the Real, stays in the real and then merges in the real. It has no existence of its own. One has to simply give importance to ones own experience. No need to believe in the scriptures. Your existence always IS. What is NOT can never exist. The IS always remains IS. To experience 'I AM', no effort is required. No practice. There is no doubt of our existence. The real essence is our existence. The base, the foundation of all appearance - of all creation. That is Paramatma (Supreme Consciousness,God). Meera Das Ram Ram ---------------------------- This is the sanest stuff I heard in a while! Hare Krishna! Gurunath Prakash ---------------------------- GITA TALK GROUP GUIDELINES: 1. Purpose of the group is to help Sadhakas clarify their doubts related to Gitaji shalokas. Therefore, responses which further clarify the understanding of Gitaji, will only be posted. 2. Wherever possible, please quote Gitaji or other scriptures to substantiate your response. 3. Kindly limit personal feelings, opinions, beliefs etc. to the extent that they further help in understanding the Gita shlokas 4. Please be as concise and to the point as possible, respecting sadhaka's time. 5. Kindly focus your writing to the subject at hand only. 6. Please do not include links to the other sites or other organizations. 7. Kindly do not include your personal information such as phone number, address etc. 8. Please do not address the response to a particular individual since the message is going to the entire group. 9. Due to the large readership, all responses may not be posted. 10. Moderator at his discretion, may modify the posting, if content is unclear or not appropriate for distribution to the group. 11. Please respond taking into consideration the novices, youth, westerners, non-sectarian audience. Kindly limit the use to Sanskrit words only, rather provide the English word with Sanskrit bracketed wherever possible. MODERATOR Ram Ram ------------------------ Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 7, 2009 Report Share Posted January 7, 2009 Dear Sadhak Community (1) Is the purpose of this forum only to discuss the meaning behind Gita slokas? and / or (2) interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life? (By practical life, I mean one living the normal life while in the quest for God, Gita does not shun the karma, but the attachment towards it) While I understand both are important, Gita is directing its readers like us to grow from Tatwa vaadibhi (one who reads and discusses about the essential element) to tatva darsibhi (one who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat'). I am particularly and practically interested in this transition, because some of the comments from my fellow sadhaks like 'then the soul leaves the body','everything has nothing, while nothing has every thing' while the same people are also suggesting 'no one may have seen God' 'Tatvadarsibhi' (who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat') is referred in Gita 2:16 of Sankhya Yoga. Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' here. Let me know your views on the transition. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- NEW POSTING Wonderful dear Venu. In other words, you are telling us all to shut up! Yes that is very much required for any serious seeker. You are very right … no scripture recommends tattva-vada. Definitely, tattva-vada can be a potential plague … most often, it is better to be ignorant rather than being a tattava-vadin: Andhantamah pravishanti ye avidyaamupaasate | Tato bhuya iva te tamo ye u vidyaayaam rataah || But, … is there any other way toward becoming a tattva-darshin? Manasaivedamaaptavyam neha naanaasti kinchana || We have to retrace the same path in which we collected our garbage (ignorance and inertia) to remove the same – our minds and bodies. You know, the vaccine is in the very germ! We have to turn the same germ against itself to releive ourselves from our deseases. We are helpless but to indulge in this vada (fight with our own bodily and mental demands) to remove the ignorance and inertia harbored within. The darshana (attainment of peace) is an eventuality of the vada (the war within). No war … no peace! No war within is a suicide in other words … Tangste pretyaabhigacchhanti ye kechaatmahano janaah || One who persihes without fighting the ignorance and inertia harbored within is the worst of all suicides. Therefore, a true vada (a truthful fight against one's own ignorance and inertia - you may want to call the vaccine, Tattva Vimarsha) is very essential to attain The Peace (Tattva Darshana) … after all a war is a war … things can go wrong … but it is definitely better than a suicide … definitely better than being consumed by our own tendencies as time passes over rendering no resistance like a pashu … Off course, the vada has the most vicious side effect that it itself can become the biggest vasana … well, as far as one is cognizant of the vada and its vicuous side effects, it is good and … that is the only way. The clouds of our ignorance and inertia become thinner and thinner as our truthfulness in our Tattva Vada intensifies in our internal search for the truth (Vada should be pitched against one's own well- established stupidity NOT ON THE STUPIDITY WISHFULLY PERCEIVED IN OTHERS!). Clarity of the truth (Tattva darshana) naturally increases as the clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner and thinner … it is an eventuality that we look forward to so that we can finally perform your wonderful suggestion – SHUT UP! Till then … let us poor things perform the ritual waging the war within. Once in a while, please keep peeping in to remind us that we really wage it only for the correct reason (to burn the ignorance within) and only on the correct targets (to uproot the inertia within). That is helpful. THANK YOU. Respects. Naga Narayana ------------------------------- Dear sadaks, Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' This is what Bagavan said to Arjuna. Bagavan said, " What is use of knowing all knowledge when I (bagavan) is right in front of you " . Means do not worry of Sadanas, Karmas, Scripts, knowledge on Sat etc when the SAT (bagavan) has comes. That is surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan who will take care of all the good what knowledge could give and also eradicate all vasanas, Karmas by HIS sankalpa itself. We have been trying over several births and still landing here. But if Bagavan tries you, the there is no any obstacle to liberate. But if Bagavan wants to try one, then he must have Niskama Prema Bakthi, which Bagavan has said in Geetha. Jai Sri Krishna baiya sathyanarayan ------------------------- Happy new year 2009 to all sadhaks Thanks for your co-operation and guide regarding Gita 2.16 pawan singhal -------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear Sadhakas, Namaste! I have been thinking on the same line( as response to BG 8:3 & 4 or stand alone) to bring in more emphasis in our posts that will bring changes in us - transition the teaching of Gita or any authentic teachings into reality as Venuji has said here! We have had several nice posts explaining the BG Ch 8:3 & 4 and 2:16 recently. What is the relationship of that Brahman, the Imperishable, That ISNESS to I, Adhyatman, Adhibhutas etc.? Unless we experience, and as a result change, it is of little use, we would think. Brahman may look out of reach, far away! As I see there is no substitute for deep understanding which comes from looking at inner experience as we read or hear spiritual discourses. In otherwords, we can receive information on such matters and we can say " ok I know, I am embodied soul or Existence/Sat " just as we know Delhi is north-East to Mumbai. This works in the objective world, but I don't think it will work in the field we are dealing on this platform as we have to rise beyond mind. We need to discover experientially we are Consciousness, by knowing what Consciousness means, in the first place! My humble suggestion would be to see, feel deeply those words of wisdom, let them resonate in our consciousness or awareness, in our silence, long enough! They will convey some understanding based on experience that is your own, if mind opens up to receive! When such power ladden words merge in silence they take " us " in Divine Presence! It is important not to push away such intimations by saying " no, its not according to such and such... " . At this point I would stop here to hit this point which I have found very helpful in all my pursuits. Everything we hear or read from Realized ones like Swamiji, we need to translate them in our own ways of putting it in practice in order to say we have understood them. It is clarity that speaks through us, not " an informed person " who impersonates us! More on the subject later! Namaskar.......Pratap Bhatt ------------------------------ Hari Om The Q of Venuji had two facets. One re the object of this Satsanga Forum. While I am not in any way a Founder of this Forum but as I see there is a common thread binding all Sadhaks - Swamiji Shri Ramsukhdasji Maharaj and Holy Gita. The sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal- beyond all faiths and religions- covering humanity at large. This forum is in my view at present " evolving " and the deliberations are getting divine and divine. We , in fact, can easily state that we are part of a Jnana Yagya within the meaning of Holy Gita. Hence I don't see any limitations on the scope of this forum. Since Holy Gita encompasses entire humanity , both principles and practice of ideal human conduct - I see nothing wrong in our addressing any type of problems faced by Sadhaks in their spiritual journey. All my personal views as one of the many Sadhaks of this divine group. Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Dear all , Yes , if we can implement the teachings of gita , in our day to day living , not only will it make life Less stressful , but more meaningful . After all we live in our communities and mingle / work / interact, so i Feel as long as we understand The true meaning (spirit of the message ) of the message sought to be Conveyed by the gita and try & Impact the same in our lives , things will be much better . In short ,what we want to be is better human beings , because only than can we be better Parents / children / friends / spouses /sadhaks / teachers/ Rgds Arvind Malhotra ---------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The very existence is " SAT " . Those who have experienced the characteristics of " SAT " and ever changing function of nature- " ASAT " , they in practice experience " their obvious , self proven, natural, automatic positioning in the existence viz SAT . In their experience there is nothing known as ASAT existing. In other words in their experience only SAT is existing- nothing else is existing. Such great people are called " tattva darshibhih " . In their experience only their positioning in SAT- imperishable, permanent, ever present existence- remains. Through that positioning they get highest rewards. In BG 2:16- the term " ubhayorapi " - represents " conscience " ! " Antah " - represents " element knowledge " !! " Drishtah " - represents " experience " !!! Meaning thereby that " conscience has transformed ( " transition " term as used by the questioner) in to the experiential knowledge and now what has remained is SAT - existence only! This is the highest state of Jnana Yoga!! The Highest reward! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16). Swamiji has been very clear about this... " Real " (Sat) is our natural state. Natural is what needs no effort. It is ever attained. It simply IS. Be situate in it. The essence (Real) is always there - will always be there. The real is not created. The unreal is created from the Real, stays in the real and then merges in the real. It has no existence of its own. One has to simply give importance to ones own experience. No need to believe in the scriptures. Your existence always IS. What is NOT can never exist. The IS always remains IS. To experience 'I AM', no effort is required. No practice. There is no doubt of our existence. The real essence is our existence. The base, the foundation of all appearance - of all creation. That is Paramatma (Supreme Consciousness,God). Meera Das Ram Ram ---------------------------- This is the sanest stuff I heard in a while! Hare Krishna! Gurunath Prakash ---------------------------- GITA TALK GROUP GUIDELINES: 1. Purpose of the group is to help Sadhakas clarify their doubts related to Gitaji shalokas. Therefore, responses which further clarify the understanding of Gitaji, will only be posted. 2. Wherever possible, please quote Gitaji or other scriptures to substantiate your response. 3. Kindly limit personal feelings, opinions, beliefs etc. to the extent that they further help in understanding the Gita shlokas 4. Please be as concise and to the point as possible, respecting sadhaka's time. 5. Kindly focus your writing to the subject at hand only. 6. Please do not include links to the other sites or other organizations. 7. Kindly do not include your personal information such as phone number, address etc. 8. Please do not address the response to a particular individual since the message is going to the entire group. 9. Due to the large readership, all responses may not be posted. 10. Moderator at his discretion, may modify the posting, if content is unclear or not appropriate for distribution to the group. 11. Please respond taking into consideration the novices, youth, westerners, non-sectarian audience. Kindly limit the use to Sanskrit words only, rather provide the English word with Sanskrit bracketed wherever possible. MODERATOR Ram Ram ------------------------ Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2009 Report Share Posted January 15, 2009 Dear Sadhak Community (1) Is the purpose of this forum only to discuss the meaning behind Gita slokas? and / or (2) interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life? (By practical life, I mean one living the normal life while in the quest for God, Gita does not shun the karma, but the attachment towards it) While I understand both are important, Gita is directing its readers like us to grow from Tatwa vaadibhi (one who reads and discusses about the essential element) to tatva darsibhi (one who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat'). I am particularly and practically interested in this transition, because some of the comments from my fellow sadhaks like 'then the soul leaves the body','everything has nothing, while nothing has every thing' while the same people are also suggesting 'no one may have seen God' 'Tatvadarsibhi' (who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat') is referred in Gita 2:16 of Sankhya Yoga. Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' here. Let me know your views on the transition. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- SUMMARY OF SADHAK RESPONSES Ram Ram no scripture recommends only tattva-vada sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal. It addresses principles and practice of ideal human conduct. All issues can be addressed. As clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner, clarity increases " tattva darshibhih " remain only in SAT (Existence) " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16) Sadhak is to be tattva darsibhi (by living/practicing 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). Surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan and all vasanas will be eradicated Bhagwan will reveal himself to his children and bring his children together in the way they resort to Him. Implementing the teachings of gita - KEY to better you and world Ram Ram ---------------------------- NEW POSTING Dear Venu Komanduri, B.G. 4 In whatever way they resort To Me do I thus reward them. It is My path which ev'rywhere All men follow, O Arjuna. (11). People the world over from many different faiths, or even non faiths, who started their journey so very long ago, who hear as it were the ringing of the sacred bells, and have a yearning in their hearts for the unknown Beloved, they feel that Love, they know it is there. Do you not think that Divine Krishna would not take his children by the hand and show them the way home, 'The last miles'. It is by means of their actions by their morality and there love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. Do you think HE would not bring his children together so they may find comfort, be supported and support others in Divine Forum. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ----------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Wonderful dear Venu. In other words, you are telling us all to shut up! Yes that is very much required for any serious seeker. You are very right … no scripture recommends tattva-vada. Definitely, tattva-vada can be a potential plague … most often, it is better to be ignorant rather than being a tattava-vadin: Andhantamah pravishanti ye avidyaamupaasate | Tato bhuya iva te tamo ye u vidyaayaam rataah || But, … is there any other way toward becoming a tattva-darshin? Manasaivedamaaptavyam neha naanaasti kinchana || We have to retrace the same path in which we collected our garbage (ignorance and inertia) to remove the same – our minds and bodies. You know, the vaccine is in the very germ! We have to turn the same germ against itself to releive ourselves from our deseases. We are helpless but to indulge in this vada (fight with our own bodily and mental demands) to remove the ignorance and inertia harbored within. The darshana (attainment of peace) is an eventuality of the vada (the war within). No war … no peace! No war within is a suicide in other words … Tangste pretyaabhigacchhanti ye kechaatmahano janaah || One who persihes without fighting the ignorance and inertia harbored within is the worst of all suicides. Therefore, a true vada (a truthful fight against one's own ignorance and inertia - you may want to call the vaccine, Tattva Vimarsha) is very essential to attain The Peace (Tattva Darshana) … after all a war is a war … things can go wrong … but it is definitely better than a suicide … definitely better than being consumed by our own tendencies as time passes over rendering no resistance like a pashu … Off course, the vada has the most vicious side effect that it itself can become the biggest vasana … well, as far as one is cognizant of the vada and its vicuous side effects, it is good and … that is the only way. The clouds of our ignorance and inertia become thinner and thinner as our truthfulness in our Tattva Vada intensifies in our internal search for the truth (Vada should be pitched against one's own well- established stupidity NOT ON THE STUPIDITY WISHFULLY PERCEIVED IN OTHERS!). Clarity of the truth (Tattva darshana) naturally increases as the clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner and thinner … it is an eventuality that we look forward to so that we can finally perform your wonderful suggestion – SHUT UP! Till then … let us poor things perform the ritual waging the war within. Once in a while, please keep peeping in to remind us that we really wage it only for the correct reason (to burn the ignorance within) and only on the correct targets (to uproot the inertia within). That is helpful. THANK YOU. Respects. Naga Narayana ------------------------------- Dear sadaks, Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' This is what Bagavan said to Arjuna. Bagavan said, " What is use of knowing all knowledge when I (bagavan) is right in front of you " . Means do not worry of Sadanas, Karmas, Scripts, knowledge on Sat etc when the SAT (bagavan) has comes. That is surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan who will take care of all the good what knowledge could give and also eradicate all vasanas, Karmas by HIS sankalpa itself. We have been trying over several births and still landing here. But if Bagavan tries you, the there is no any obstacle to liberate. But if Bagavan wants to try one, then he must have Niskama Prema Bakthi, which Bagavan has said in Geetha. Jai Sri Krishna baiya sathyanarayan =========================================== Happy new year 2009 to all sadhaks Thanks for your co-operation and guide regarding Gita 2.16 pawan singhal -------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The Q of Venuji had two facets. One re the object of this Satsanga Forum. While I am not in any way a Founder of this Forum but as I see there is a common thread binding all Sadhaks - Swamiji Shri Ramsukhdasji Maharaj and Holy Gita. The sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal- beyond all faiths and religions- covering humanity at large. This forum is in my view at present " evolving " and the deliberations are getting divine and divine. We , in fact, can easily state that we are part of a Jnana Yagya within the meaning of Holy Gita. Hence I don't see any limitations on the scope of this forum. Since Holy Gita encompasses entire humanity , both principles and practice of ideal human conduct - I see nothing wrong in our addressing any type of problems faced by Sadhaks in their spiritual journey. All my personal views as one of the many Sadhaks of this divine group. Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Dear all , Yes , if we can implement the teachings of gita , in our day to day living , not only will it make life Less stressful , but more meaningful . After all we live in our communities and mingle / work / interact, so i Feel as long as we understand The true meaning (spirit of the message ) of the message sought to be Conveyed by the gita and try & Impact the same in our lives , things will be much better . In short ,what we want to be is better human beings , because only than can we be better Parents / children / friends / spouses /sadhaks / teachers/ Rgds Arvind Malhotra ---------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The very existence is " SAT " . Those who have experienced the characteristics of " SAT " and ever changing function of nature- " ASAT " , they in practice experience " their obvious , self proven, natural, automatic positioning in the existence viz SAT . In their experience there is nothing known as ASAT existing. In other words in their experience only SAT is existing- nothing else is existing. Such great people are called " tattva darshibhih " . In their experience only their positioning in SAT- imperishable, permanent, ever present existence- remains. Through that positioning they get highest rewards. In BG 2:16- the term " ubhayorapi " - represents " conscience " ! " Antah " - represents " element knowledge " !! " Drishtah " - represents " experience " !!! Meaning thereby that " conscience has transformed ( " transition " term as used by the questioner) in to the experiential knowledge and now what has remained is SAT - existence only! This is the highest state of Jnana Yoga!! The Highest reward! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16). Swamiji has been very clear about this... " Real " (Sat) is our natural state. Natural is what needs no effort. It is ever attained. It simply IS. Be situate in it. The essence (Real) is always there - will always be there. The real is not created. The unreal is created from the Real, stays in the real and then merges in the real. It has no existence of its own. One has to simply give importance to ones own experience. No need to believe in the scriptures. Your existence always IS. What is NOT can never exist. The IS always remains IS. To experience 'I AM', no effort is required. No practice. There is no doubt of our existence. The real essence is our existence. The base, the foundation of all appearance - of all creation. That is Paramatma (Supreme Consciousness,God). Meera Das Ram Ram ---------------------------- This is the sanest stuff I heard in a while! Hare Krishna! Gurunath Prakash ---------------------------- GITA TALK GROUP GUIDELINES: 1. Purpose of the group is to help Sadhakas clarify their doubts related to Gitaji shalokas. Therefore, responses which further clarify the understanding of Gitaji, will only be posted. 2. Wherever possible, please quote Gitaji or other scriptures to substantiate your response. 3. Kindly limit personal feelings, opinions, beliefs etc. to the extent that they further help in understanding the Gita shlokas 4. Please be as concise and to the point as possible, respecting sadhaka's time. 5. Kindly focus your writing to the subject at hand only. 6. Please do not include links to the other sites or other organizations. 7. Kindly do not include your personal information such as phone number, address etc. 8. Please do not address the response to a particular individual since the message is going to the entire group. 9. Due to the large readership, all responses may not be posted. 10. Moderator at his discretion, may modify the posting, if content is unclear or not appropriate for distribution to the group. 11. Please respond taking into consideration the novices, youth, westerners, non-sectarian audience. Kindly limit the use to Sanskrit words only, rather provide the English word with Sanskrit bracketed wherever possible. MODERATOR Ram Ram ------------------------ Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2009 Report Share Posted January 16, 2009 Dear Sadhak Community (1) Is the purpose of this forum only to discuss the meaning behind Gita slokas? and / or (2) interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life? (By practical life, I mean one living the normal life while in the quest for God, Gita does not shun the karma, but the attachment towards it) While I understand both are important, Gita is directing its readers like us to grow from Tatwa vaadibhi (one who reads and discusses about the essential element) to tatva darsibhi (one who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat'). I am particularly and practically interested in this transition, because some of the comments from my fellow sadhaks like 'then the soul leaves the body','everything has nothing, while nothing has every thing' while the same people are also suggesting 'no one may have seen God' 'Tatvadarsibhi' (who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat') is referred in Gita 2:16 of Sankhya Yoga. Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' here. Let me know your views on the transition. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- FOLLOW-UP Gita also says - 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - not waiting for God's hand. ---------------------------- SUMMARY OF SADHAK RESPONSES Ram Ram - No scripture recommends only tattva-vada (reading/discussing only) - Interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! - Sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal. It addresses principles and practice of ideal human conduct. All issues can be addressed. - As clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner, clarity increases - " tattva darshibhih " remain only SAT (Existence) - " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16) - Sadhak is to be tattva darsibhi (by living/practicing 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). - Surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan and all vasanas will be eradicated - Bhagwan will reveal himself to his children and bring his children together in the way they resort to Him. - Have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for yourr life (lessons from other pilgrims) - Implementing Gita teachings - KEY to betterment - Practices Gita in one's life probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion - Yes! one has to " live " Gita principles. There is no doubt, No contradiction. - God and His creation are all one - WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life. KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFEBELT - GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. - THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth. Ram Ram ---------------------------- NEW POSTING Hari Om. Hinduism never never compels one to read Gita at any point of one's life. There may be crores of hindus pass by their birth without even looking at HOLY GITA. Krushna has never uttered a word that everyone should surely read GIta. Krushna has given us Gita not to just read it and please HIM!!!!!!! He has taken pity on each and everyone of us!!!! We really dont understand the birth cycle at all !!!!! TO Krushna is attached the Vishnu Maya and Krushna is OMNI PRESENT in PRACRUTHI (Nature) !!!! WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life !!!! We keep facing cyclone after cyclone and we get lost in this action of pracruthi (Nature) !!!! Some start losing faith in God as they are shaken as disaster after disaster ruin their life !!!! This continues till we surrender to Krushna and take Gita in our hand. Here comes a great change in our life as KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFE BELT ---GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. He explains in detail the dimensions of nature-pracruthi, what our body is made of, what our mind does, what our intellect does, what is SATH CHITH. He has taken great care to educate us on Sthira Bhuddhi, Ignorance and true knowledge. THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth !!!!! So interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! With regards, Usha Sridhar. ---------------------------- Hari Om Dear Sadhak Venu ! What is your question? I wonder if any sadhak contradicted what you mean to say ! Yes- one has to " live " Gita principles. How and where there is doubt on the same? Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B ---------------------------- Re:Tatwa vaadibhi to tatva darsibhi Venu Komanduri is absolutely right: the ultimate aim is tatva darsibhi, though tatva darsibhi may be the initial step towards that. If an individual gets too attached to discussions and interpretation on Gita, the focus on practice to become tatva darsibhi may be lost. And, when one practices Gita in one's life it is probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion on Gita. I am sure God will help and direct you along the path. If you have learnt that God and His creation are all one, realize that by living your life on that principle even as you have to act as a person distict from others. Difficult. But I try this path hoping that one day God will ensure successful transition to Oneness. Basudeb Sen ---------------------------- Dear Sadhak Community There is a nice response from Mike Keenor, nice in the sense there is outpouring positivism. I approached Gita in many ways - scientific, athiestic and spiritual. From all the angles I see there is immense wisdom stored in Gita. Ever since I have been studying Gita, specially the last 2 years, I am amazed at the down to earth messages. So I remain on earth and talk about the practical messages clearly indicated, they are neither hidden nor hinted, in Gita. Being a science student and in engineering profession, I always question things / dictum before my mind sees the rationale behind them - be it Vedas / Gita or otherwise. There are many slokas in Gita that showers the life management principles even if I study them as an athiest - ignore the fruits of desires (twaktaphalam), live in the 9-holed town (navadwarava pure dehi). Only to say 'critical examination of any scripture' is utmost necessary, I quote from Gita ( 2:42, 2:43, 2:44 ) which suggested not get trapped by the 'karma kanda' /'swargabhoga' (the rituals and the pleasures of the heaven) in the early part of Vedas. That is being rational about the objective of Gita. Despite my strong faith and belief in Gita, I do not trust in rebirth, saying that 'people suffer from the karma of previous births', 'concept of sin / virtue' as account maintained by God or some power. No! I do not!! There can be many interpretations to those words / usages in Gita. Remember that though Gita was documented in 2nd century AD, the slokas were known even before 1500 BC. We are 3500 years from the source and its meaning. Mike - I like your positivism, but Gita is also suggesting 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - meaning there is controllable part the sadhak has to do (not waiting for God's hand), wherever he cannot, he should seek help from others (remember God lives in all). For all this sport of activities, the energy comes from the positivism / belief / imagination /critical thinking /relating the messages to the practical difficulties of life. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram The KARMA issue will be addressed as a separate topic. Kindly stay with one topic and subject at hand. Gita Talk Moderators, Ram Ram ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear Venu Komanduri, B.G. 4 In whatever way they resort To Me do I thus reward them. It is My path which ev'rywhere All men follow, O Arjuna. (11). People the world over from many different faiths, or even non faiths, who started their journey so very long ago, who hear as it were the ringing of the sacred bells, and have a yearning in their hearts for the unknown Beloved, they feel that Love, they know it is there. Do you not think that Divine Krishna would not take his children by the hand and show them the way home, 'The last miles'. It is by means of their actions by their morality and there love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. Do you think HE would not bring his children together so they may find comfort, be supported and support others in Divine Forum. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ----------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Wonderful dear Venu. In other words, you are telling us all to shut up! Yes that is very much required for any serious seeker. You are very right … no scripture recommends tattva-vada. Definitely, tattva-vada can be a potential plague … most often, it is better to be ignorant rather than being a tattava-vadin: Andhantamah pravishanti ye avidyaamupaasate | Tato bhuya iva te tamo ye u vidyaayaam rataah || But, … is there any other way toward becoming a tattva-darshin? Manasaivedamaaptavyam neha naanaasti kinchana || We have to retrace the same path in which we collected our garbage (ignorance and inertia) to remove the same – our minds and bodies. You know, the vaccine is in the very germ! We have to turn the same germ against itself to releive ourselves from our deseases. We are helpless but to indulge in this vada (fight with our own bodily and mental demands) to remove the ignorance and inertia harbored within. The darshana (attainment of peace) is an eventuality of the vada (the war within). No war … no peace! No war within is a suicide in other words … Tangste pretyaabhigacchhanti ye kechaatmahano janaah || One who persihes without fighting the ignorance and inertia harbored within is the worst of all suicides. Therefore, a true vada (a truthful fight against one's own ignorance and inertia - you may want to call the vaccine, Tattva Vimarsha) is very essential to attain The Peace (Tattva Darshana) … after all a war is a war … things can go wrong … but it is definitely better than a suicide … definitely better than being consumed by our own tendencies as time passes over rendering no resistance like a pashu … Off course, the vada has the most vicious side effect that it itself can become the biggest vasana … well, as far as one is cognizant of the vada and its vicuous side effects, it is good and … that is the only way. The clouds of our ignorance and inertia become thinner and thinner as our truthfulness in our Tattva Vada intensifies in our internal search for the truth (Vada should be pitched against one's own well- established stupidity NOT ON THE STUPIDITY WISHFULLY PERCEIVED IN OTHERS!). Clarity of the truth (Tattva darshana) naturally increases as the clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner and thinner … it is an eventuality that we look forward to so that we can finally perform your wonderful suggestion – SHUT UP! Till then … let us poor things perform the ritual waging the war within. Once in a while, please keep peeping in to remind us that we really wage it only for the correct reason (to burn the ignorance within) and only on the correct targets (to uproot the inertia within). That is helpful. THANK YOU. Respects. Naga Narayana ------------------------------- Dear sadaks, Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' This is what Bagavan said to Arjuna. Bagavan said, " What is use of knowing all knowledge when I (bagavan) is right in front of you " . Means do not worry of Sadanas, Karmas, Scripts, knowledge on Sat etc when the SAT (bagavan) has comes. That is surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan who will take care of all the good what knowledge could give and also eradicate all vasanas, Karmas by HIS sankalpa itself. We have been trying over several births and still landing here. But if Bagavan tries you, the there is no any obstacle to liberate. But if Bagavan wants to try one, then he must have Niskama Prema Bakthi, which Bagavan has said in Geetha. Jai Sri Krishna baiya sathyanarayan =========================================== Happy new year 2009 to all sadhaks Thanks for your co-operation and guide regarding Gita 2.16 pawan singhal -------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The Q of Venuji had two facets. One re the object of this Satsanga Forum. While I am not in any way a Founder of this Forum but as I see there is a common thread binding all Sadhaks - Swamiji Shri Ramsukhdasji Maharaj and Holy Gita. The sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal- beyond all faiths and religions- covering humanity at large. This forum is in my view at present " evolving " and the deliberations are getting divine and divine. We , in fact, can easily state that we are part of a Jnana Yagya within the meaning of Holy Gita. Hence I don't see any limitations on the scope of this forum. Since Holy Gita encompasses entire humanity , both principles and practice of ideal human conduct - I see nothing wrong in our addressing any type of problems faced by Sadhaks in their spiritual journey. All my personal views as one of the many Sadhaks of this divine group. Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Dear all , Yes , if we can implement the teachings of gita , in our day to day living , not only will it make life Less stressful , but more meaningful . After all we live in our communities and mingle / work / interact, so i Feel as long as we understand The true meaning (spirit of the message ) of the message sought to be Conveyed by the gita and try & Impact the same in our lives , things will be much better . In short ,what we want to be is better human beings , because only than can we be better Parents / children / friends / spouses /sadhaks / teachers/ Rgds Arvind Malhotra ---------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The very existence is " SAT " . Those who have experienced the characteristics of " SAT " and ever changing function of nature- " ASAT " , they in practice experience " their obvious , self proven, natural, automatic positioning in the existence viz SAT . In their experience there is nothing known as ASAT existing. In other words in their experience only SAT is existing- nothing else is existing. Such great people are called " tattva darshibhih " . In their experience only their positioning in SAT- imperishable, permanent, ever present existence- remains. Through that positioning they get highest rewards. In BG 2:16- the term " ubhayorapi " - represents " conscience " ! " Antah " - represents " element knowledge " !! " Drishtah " - represents " experience " !!! Meaning thereby that " conscience has transformed ( " transition " term as used by the questioner) in to the experiential knowledge and now what has remained is SAT - existence only! This is the highest state of Jnana Yoga!! The Highest reward! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16). Swamiji has been very clear about this... " Real " (Sat) is our natural state. Natural is what needs no effort. It is ever attained. It simply IS. Be situate in it. The essence (Real) is always there - will always be there. The real is not created. The unreal is created from the Real, stays in the real and then merges in the real. It has no existence of its own. One has to simply give importance to ones own experience. No need to believe in the scriptures. Your existence always IS. What is NOT can never exist. The IS always remains IS. To experience 'I AM', no effort is required. No practice. There is no doubt of our existence. The real essence is our existence. The base, the foundation of all appearance - of all creation. That is Paramatma (Supreme Consciousness,God). Meera Das Ram Ram ---------------------------- This is the sanest stuff I heard in a while! Hare Krishna! Gurunath Prakash ---------------------------- GITA TALK GROUP GUIDELINES: 1. Purpose of the group is to help Sadhakas clarify their doubts related to Gitaji shalokas. Therefore, responses which further clarify the understanding of Gitaji, will only be posted. 2. Wherever possible, please quote Gitaji or other scriptures to substantiate your response. 3. Kindly limit personal feelings, opinions, beliefs etc. to the extent that they further help in understanding the Gita shlokas 4. Please be as concise and to the point as possible, respecting sadhaka's time. 5. Kindly focus your writing to the subject at hand only. 6. Please do not include links to the other sites or other organizations. 7. Kindly do not include your personal information such as phone number, address etc. 8. Please do not address the response to a particular individual since the message is going to the entire group. 9. Due to the large readership, all responses may not be posted. 10. Moderator at his discretion, may modify the posting, if content is unclear or not appropriate for distribution to the group. 11. Please respond taking into consideration the novices, youth, westerners, non-sectarian audience. Kindly limit the use to Sanskrit words only, rather provide the English word with Sanskrit bracketed wherever possible. MODERATOR Ram Ram ------------------------ Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 17, 2009 Report Share Posted January 17, 2009 Dear Sadhak Community (1) Is the purpose of this forum only to discuss the meaning behind Gita slokas? and / or (2) interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life? (By practical life, I mean one living the normal life while in the quest for God, Gita does not shun the karma, but the attachment towards it) While I understand both are important, Gita is directing its readers like us to grow from Tatwa vaadibhi (one who reads and discusses about the essential element) to tatva darsibhi (one who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat'). I am particularly and practically interested in this transition, because some of the comments from my fellow sadhaks like 'then the soul leaves the body','everything has nothing, while nothing has every thing' while the same people are also suggesting 'no one may have seen God' 'Tatvadarsibhi' (who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat') is referred in Gita 2:16 of Sankhya Yoga. Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' here. Let me know your views on the transition. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- FOLLOW-UP Gita also says - 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - not waiting for God's hand. ---------------------------- SUMMARY OF SADHAK RESPONSES Ram Ram - No scripture recommends only tattva-vada (reading/discussing only) - Interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! - Sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal. It addresses principles and practice of ideal human conduct. All issues can be addressed. - As clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner, clarity increases - " tattva darshibhih " remain only SAT (Existence) - " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16) - Sadhak is to be tattva darsibhi (by living/practicing 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). - It is no about simply waiting for God to do. - It is by means of sadhak's actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. - The great souls, these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. - Surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan and all vasanas will be eradicated - Bhagwan will reveal himself to his children and bring his children together in the way they resort to Him. - Have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for yourr life (lessons from other pilgrims) - Implementing Gita teachings - KEY to betterment - Practices Gita in one's life probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion - Yes! one has to " live " Gita principles. There is no doubt, No contradiction. - Without cause-effect (rebirth), what causes such inequanimity in births, situations, circumstances etc.? - Critical Examination of Gita/God, is it possible? - Paramatma is not easily conquerable by our critical thinking etc. - Aren't Mind / Belief opposite / separate subjects altogether? - No need to believe in theories, believe your own experience - God and His creation are all one - WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life. KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFEBELT - GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. - THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth. Ram Ram ---------------------------- NEW POSTING -Shree Hari- Dear Venu Komanduri, Thanks for your comments on my post. I like to mention to you at first, that I have spent my whole life in the field of electronics, logic was one of my favorite subjects. There came a time in my life when logic, and common sense were confounded. (You will have to take my word on that, there will be hundreds of sadhaks who will understand what I am saying). Actually I was putting the opposite spin on the common view, that is practicing intuitively, maybe from the inner conscience a way of life, searching all avenues for answer to the paradoxes of existence. One must remember, there are many great souls in the world who have never heard of the Bhagavad Gita, and when they come across it they are amazed. Analize carefully what I wrote: 'It is by means of their actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives.' I really do not think I implied one should await for GOD, if it appeared that way I apologize. B.G. 11: Prostrating in adoration, do I crave Forgiveness: as a father forgives his son, A friend his dear friend, and a lover his love†" Thus even so should You forgive Me, O God. (44 Overjoyed am I, seeing Your form, and yet My mind is distracted with terror. Show me, In mercy Lord, only Your previous form†" O Lord of gods, Abode of the universe. (45 Purely out of interest what do you make of that from a logical approach. You ask about transition, it can come slowly a gently path, or fierce and fast, like fire. But whatever, " You keep chopping wood, and fetching water " . B.G. 2: Attached to pleasure and power Their minds are drawn away by this Speech, and to them is not granted The insight from meditation. (44) The introspective ones I talk of, ponder meditate, these 'Pilgrims', prefer a quiet life, you know scientists, technocrats, woodchoppers, whatever, but they do not seek glory. To quote you: 'I do not trust in rebirth, saying that 'people suffer from the karma of previous births' Talking of Yogis, or Yogis to be: Yoga Aphorism: Concentration II: (39). When he is fixed in none receiving, he gets the memory of past life. B.G. 18 And even that man who hears this, Full of faith and free from scoffing, He, liberated, shall attain The happy worlds of the righteous. (71) Has this been heard, O Pritha’s son, By you with a one-pointed mind? Moreover, has the delusion Of your ignorance been destroyed? (72) Arjuna said: Yea, destroyed is my delusion, And I have gained my memory Through Your grace, and my doubts are gone. I am firm; I will do Your word. (73) I hope my friend I have answers some of your questions, I can only tell you the truth as I see it. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ---------------------------- Hari Om Dear Mr Venu It is great to note that your kind self respects Gita except some portions of it. I have few questions. Kindly oblige by replying to the same. Please use your rational/logical mind and sharp intellect while responding so that we may reap maximum benefits. What is that " cleverness " which you referred while giving your version of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " ? Since you don't believe in rebirth, hence by your logical and rational sharp mind/intellect/ego please enlighten us as to how one child gets born in a hut and another in a palace? Is it pure coincidence or there are some laws behind the same? Why one should abstain from evil conduct? Why not, at least when one is sure of death, one should reap maximum pleasure from the world , by whatever means, as there will no rebirth to pay for_ Since there are no sins/virtues accumulating? What/Who leaves a live body so as to make it a corpse? How come 2 children of same parents have differences, inspite of living in same environment? How come in an accident one survives while another does not? Your more learned views are also solicited on that " karma kanda/swarga bhog " verses of Gitaji referred by you. What according to you may be the reasons of Lord Krishna advising us not to fall prey to the enticement of Karma Kand of Vedas? You said Sir that Krishna lives in all beings. Can you enlighten us as to why and for what time and since when? " Critical examination of Gita " - what according to you makes that necessary? Who is qualified to conduct that examination? What should be the basis of such exercise? How it should be conducted- any yardsticks in your logical/rationale mind ? Your elaborate views are solicited for benefit of us all. Most of the Sadhaks in this forum , including me, have more belief than logic/rationale. Your association and contribution therefore should enrich us. May be in the end you also walk out richer too. I trust you will respond " positively " . Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Jai Hanuman Venuji Maharaj ! I noted your kind advice to our Brother Mike Keenor . I quote below the last para - Kindly elaborate as to what is this " belief " ? Being a science student yourself and luckily ( " luckily " -since you don't believe in rebirth etc-or you don't believe in " luck " also ?) you also have mind and sharp intellect. Naturally , therefore, you critically evaluate everything before any acceptance- even if that is Holy Gita. Then what is this animal called " belief " which you referred in your elaborate advice to Mike Bhaiyya? Where then, Jee, is space for " belief " in your critical/sharp/logical/rational/thinking/evaluating/analytical/energe tic as well as energy producing/imaginative mind and intellect? Are not mind and belief two different and opposite subjects altogether? Like North Pole and South Pole? Bolo Jee! Boliye Sir !! Waiting for a positive response, Jee. Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram What " rationale " what " critical exam " We think, God is that easily conquerable by us? by our rationale and critical examination? Until one realizes the a speck on nothingness that we are compared to God ...then and then only true knowledge will reveal itself (rather we will allow it to flow into us) . We are like that upside down bowl, when it is raining. Swamiji has given this example... that the rain is pouring equallly on all. What can God do if we chose to keep our bowl, upside down? He is equally accessible to all. No one is forcing one to believe. Let us believe in our own experience. All our lives we have been learning only from " cause and effect " no other reason. We avoid fire, because sometime or the other we felt the heat and knew it to be dangerous. We learn from our mistakes, because there is a consequence. There is a price to be paid. We don't need to believe in theories as Swamiji says, just believe in our own experiences(anubhav). Ram Ram ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om. Hinduism never never compels one to read Gita at any point of one's life. There may be crores of hindus pass by their birth without even looking at HOLY GITA. Krushna has never uttered a word that everyone should surely read GIta. Krushna has given us Gita not to just read it and please HIM!!!!!!! He has taken pity on each and everyone of us!!!! We really dont understand the birth cycle at all !!!!! TO Krushna is attached the Vishnu Maya and Krushna is OMNI PRESENT in PRACRUTHI (Nature) !!!! WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life !!!! We keep facing cyclone after cyclone and we get lost in this action of pracruthi (Nature) !!!! Some start losing faith in God as they are shaken as disaster after disaster ruin their life !!!! This continues till we surrender to Krushna and take Gita in our hand. Here comes a great change in our life as KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFE BELT ---GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. He explains in detail the dimensions of nature-pracruthi, what our body is made of, what our mind does, what our intellect does, what is SATH CHITH. He has taken great care to educate us on Sthira Bhuddhi, Ignorance and true knowledge. THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth !!!!! So interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! With regards, Usha Sridhar. ---------------------------- Hari Om Dear Sadhak Venu ! What is your question? I wonder if any sadhak contradicted what you mean to say ! Yes- one has to " live " Gita principles. How and where there is doubt on the same? Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B ---------------------------- Re:Tatwa vaadibhi to tatva darsibhi Venu Komanduri is absolutely right: the ultimate aim is tatva darsibhi, though tatva darsibhi may be the initial step towards that. If an individual gets too attached to discussions and interpretation on Gita, the focus on practice to become tatva darsibhi may be lost. And, when one practices Gita in one's life it is probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion on Gita. I am sure God will help and direct you along the path. If you have learnt that God and His creation are all one, realize that by living your life on that principle even as you have to act as a person distict from others. Difficult. But I try this path hoping that one day God will ensure successful transition to Oneness. Basudeb Sen ---------------------------- Dear Sadhak Community There is a nice response from Mike Keenor, nice in the sense there is outpouring positivism. I approached Gita in many ways - scientific, athiestic and spiritual. From all the angles I see there is immense wisdom stored in Gita. Ever since I have been studying Gita, specially the last 2 years, I am amazed at the down to earth messages. So I remain on earth and talk about the practical messages clearly indicated, they are neither hidden nor hinted, in Gita. Being a science student and in engineering profession, I always question things / dictum before my mind sees the rationale behind them - be it Vedas / Gita or otherwise. There are many slokas in Gita that showers the life management principles even if I study them as an athiest - ignore the fruits of desires (twaktaphalam), live in the 9-holed town (navadwarava pure dehi). Only to say 'critical examination of any scripture' is utmost necessary, I quote from Gita ( 2:42, 2:43, 2:44 ) which suggested not get trapped by the 'karma kanda' /'swargabhoga' (the rituals and the pleasures of the heaven) in the early part of Vedas. That is being rational about the objective of Gita. Despite my strong faith and belief in Gita, I do not trust in rebirth, saying that 'people suffer from the karma of previous births', 'concept of sin / virtue' as account maintained by God or some power. No! I do not!! There can be many interpretations to those words / usages in Gita. Remember that though Gita was documented in 2nd century AD, the slokas were known even before 1500 BC. We are 3500 years from the source and its meaning. Mike - I like your positivism, but Gita is also suggesting 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - meaning there is controllable part the sadhak has to do (not waiting for God's hand), wherever he cannot, he should seek help from others (remember God lives in all). For all this sport of activities, the energy comes from the positivism / belief / imagination /critical thinking /relating the messages to the practical difficulties of life. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram The KARMA issue will be addressed as a separate topic. Kindly stay with one topic and subject at hand. Gita Talk Moderators, Ram Ram ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear Venu Komanduri, B.G. 4 In whatever way they resort To Me do I thus reward them. It is My path which ev'rywhere All men follow, O Arjuna. (11). People the world over from many different faiths, or even non faiths, who started their journey so very long ago, who hear as it were the ringing of the sacred bells, and have a yearning in their hearts for the unknown Beloved, they feel that Love, they know it is there. Do you not think that Divine Krishna would not take his children by the hand and show them the way home, 'The last miles'. It is by means of their actions by their morality and there love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. Do you think HE would not bring his children together so they may find comfort, be supported and support others in Divine Forum. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ----------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Wonderful dear Venu. In other words, you are telling us all to shut up! Yes that is very much required for any serious seeker. You are very right … no scripture recommends tattva-vada. Definitely, tattva-vada can be a potential plague … most often, it is better to be ignorant rather than being a tattava-vadin: Andhantamah pravishanti ye avidyaamupaasate | Tato bhuya iva te tamo ye u vidyaayaam rataah || But, … is there any other way toward becoming a tattva-darshin? Manasaivedamaaptavyam neha naanaasti kinchana || We have to retrace the same path in which we collected our garbage (ignorance and inertia) to remove the same – our minds and bodies. You know, the vaccine is in the very germ! We have to turn the same germ against itself to releive ourselves from our deseases. We are helpless but to indulge in this vada (fight with our own bodily and mental demands) to remove the ignorance and inertia harbored within. The darshana (attainment of peace) is an eventuality of the vada (the war within). No war … no peace! No war within is a suicide in other words … Tangste pretyaabhigacchhanti ye kechaatmahano janaah || One who persihes without fighting the ignorance and inertia harbored within is the worst of all suicides. Therefore, a true vada (a truthful fight against one's own ignorance and inertia - you may want to call the vaccine, Tattva Vimarsha) is very essential to attain The Peace (Tattva Darshana) … after all a war is a war … things can go wrong … but it is definitely better than a suicide … definitely better than being consumed by our own tendencies as time passes over rendering no resistance like a pashu … Off course, the vada has the most vicious side effect that it itself can become the biggest vasana … well, as far as one is cognizant of the vada and its vicuous side effects, it is good and … that is the only way. The clouds of our ignorance and inertia become thinner and thinner as our truthfulness in our Tattva Vada intensifies in our internal search for the truth (Vada should be pitched against one's own well- established stupidity NOT ON THE STUPIDITY WISHFULLY PERCEIVED IN OTHERS!). Clarity of the truth (Tattva darshana) naturally increases as the clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner and thinner … it is an eventuality that we look forward to so that we can finally perform your wonderful suggestion – SHUT UP! Till then … let us poor things perform the ritual waging the war within. Once in a while, please keep peeping in to remind us that we really wage it only for the correct reason (to burn the ignorance within) and only on the correct targets (to uproot the inertia within). That is helpful. THANK YOU. Respects. Naga Narayana ------------------------------- Dear sadaks, Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' This is what Bagavan said to Arjuna. Bagavan said, " What is use of knowing all knowledge when I (bagavan) is right in front of you " . Means do not worry of Sadanas, Karmas, Scripts, knowledge on Sat etc when the SAT (bagavan) has comes. That is surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan who will take care of all the good what knowledge could give and also eradicate all vasanas, Karmas by HIS sankalpa itself. We have been trying over several births and still landing here. But if Bagavan tries you, the there is no any obstacle to liberate. But if Bagavan wants to try one, then he must have Niskama Prema Bakthi, which Bagavan has said in Geetha. Jai Sri Krishna baiya sathyanarayan =========================================== Happy new year 2009 to all sadhaks Thanks for your co-operation and guide regarding Gita 2.16 pawan singhal -------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The Q of Venuji had two facets. One re the object of this Satsanga Forum. While I am not in any way a Founder of this Forum but as I see there is a common thread binding all Sadhaks - Swamiji Shri Ramsukhdasji Maharaj and Holy Gita. The sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal- beyond all faiths and religions- covering humanity at large. This forum is in my view at present " evolving " and the deliberations are getting divine and divine. We , in fact, can easily state that we are part of a Jnana Yagya within the meaning of Holy Gita. Hence I don't see any limitations on the scope of this forum. Since Holy Gita encompasses entire humanity , both principles and practice of ideal human conduct - I see nothing wrong in our addressing any type of problems faced by Sadhaks in their spiritual journey. All my personal views as one of the many Sadhaks of this divine group. Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Dear all , Yes , if we can implement the teachings of gita , in our day to day living , not only will it make life Less stressful , but more meaningful . After all we live in our communities and mingle / work / interact, so i Feel as long as we understand The true meaning (spirit of the message ) of the message sought to be Conveyed by the gita and try & Impact the same in our lives , things will be much better . In short ,what we want to be is better human beings , because only than can we be better Parents / children / friends / spouses /sadhaks / teachers/ Rgds Arvind Malhotra ---------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The very existence is " SAT " . Those who have experienced the characteristics of " SAT " and ever changing function of nature- " ASAT " , they in practice experience " their obvious , self proven, natural, automatic positioning in the existence viz SAT . In their experience there is nothing known as ASAT existing. In other words in their experience only SAT is existing- nothing else is existing. Such great people are called " tattva darshibhih " . In their experience only their positioning in SAT- imperishable, permanent, ever present existence- remains. Through that positioning they get highest rewards. In BG 2:16- the term " ubhayorapi " - represents " conscience " ! " Antah " - represents " element knowledge " !! " Drishtah " - represents " experience " !!! Meaning thereby that " conscience has transformed ( " transition " term as used by the questioner) in to the experiential knowledge and now what has remained is SAT - existence only! This is the highest state of Jnana Yoga!! The Highest reward! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16). Swamiji has been very clear about this... " Real " (Sat) is our natural state. Natural is what needs no effort. It is ever attained. It simply IS. Be situate in it. The essence (Real) is always there - will always be there. The real is not created. The unreal is created from the Real, stays in the real and then merges in the real. It has no existence of its own. One has to simply give importance to ones own experience. No need to believe in the scriptures. Your existence always IS. What is NOT can never exist. The IS always remains IS. To experience 'I AM', no effort is required. No practice. There is no doubt of our existence. The real essence is our existence. The base, the foundation of all appearance - of all creation. That is Paramatma (Supreme Consciousness,God). Meera Das Ram Ram ---------------------------- This is the sanest stuff I heard in a while! Hare Krishna! Gurunath Prakash ---------------------------- GITA TALK GROUP GUIDELINES: 1. Purpose of the group is to help Sadhakas clarify their doubts related to Gitaji shalokas. Therefore, responses which further clarify the understanding of Gitaji, will only be posted. 2. Wherever possible, please quote Gitaji or other scriptures to substantiate your response. 3. Kindly limit personal feelings, opinions, beliefs etc. to the extent that they further help in understanding the Gita shlokas 4. Please be as concise and to the point as possible, respecting sadhaka's time. 5. Kindly focus your writing to the subject at hand only. 6. Please do not include links to the other sites or other organizations. 7. Kindly do not include your personal information such as phone number, address etc. 8. Please do not address the response to a particular individual since the message is going to the entire group. 9. Due to the large readership, all responses may not be posted. 10. Moderator at his discretion, may modify the posting, if content is unclear or not appropriate for distribution to the group. 11. Please respond taking into consideration the novices, youth, westerners, non-sectarian audience. Kindly limit the use to Sanskrit words only, rather provide the English word with Sanskrit bracketed wherever possible. MODERATOR Ram Ram ------------------------ Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2009 Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 Dear Sadhak Community (1) Is the purpose of this forum only to discuss the meaning behind Gita slokas? and / or (2) interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life? (By practical life, I mean one living the normal life while in the quest for God, Gita does not shun the karma, but the attachment towards it) While I understand both are important, Gita is directing its readers like us to grow from Tatwa vaadibhi (one who reads and discusses about the essential element) to tatva darsibhi (one who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat'). I am particularly and practically interested in this transition, because some of the comments from my fellow sadhaks like 'then the soul leaves the body','everything has nothing, while nothing has every thing' while the same people are also suggesting 'no one may have seen God' 'Tatvadarsibhi' (who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat') is referred in Gita 2:16 of Sankhya Yoga. Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' here. Let me know your views on the transition. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- FOLLOW-UP Gita also says - 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - not waiting for God's hand. ---------------------------- NEW POSTING Dear sadaks, Once soul leaves the body, it takes nothing of worldly things is the meaning. A crorepathi on death can never carry with him anything, even his body except his own cause and effects (Karmas). Of course many has seen GOD in the past. But we never believed them. We insulted them as " Chitta Brama " . We never knew their Chitta was with Brama. Mother Andal in SriRangam has seen God. Thrirupan Alwar, Nandanar, Kannaper, Samartha Ramadoss, Bradrachalla Ramadoss, Shridi Sai Baba, Ramana Rishi, Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa showed God to Vivekanath. Paramathuma is NOT object has been discussed so many times. HE is to be known through Gyana/Bakthi. In Srimath Bagavath it is said that Bakthi Maatha unable to wake up her 2 children Gyana and Virag as Kali was Born. For a person with poorna faith, he can see God in many. For a person with distrubed & uncertain faith, even if God appears he will start thinking whether it is illusion, just like Duryodan saw Viswaroop. For Valmiki with years of Ram Naam Ant hill covering him, never lost faith. Fraction of faith lost, will show no any results. Though in Bible, the example is nice. Christ was walking on water. A disciple also wanted to walk on water. Christ said come. He walked on water. But as he was waliking on water, a doubt came in his mind , " What if I sink " . He sank. Christ said to disciple, " When you lost faith- faithlessness sank you " . Sri Ragavendar Swamy in his teen age gave food to Sri Krishna Idol which never ate. He profusly cried to extent of fainting, Sri Krishna came and ate. So was in case of Namadev. Mother Yasoda said today I will tie up Krishna. She tried with a rope and it was getting short of 2 Inches. When she surrendered to Sri Krishna saying with love,' Oh Krishna I cannot tie you. Bagavan gave HIS hip to be tied. Bakthi (physical surrender), intellect (Mind surrender), faith (Budhi Surrender) known as Trikarna Sudhi, Bagavan appears in the form you desire. Purpose of this forum is to impart Gyana so that one can see God. Guru (this forum) shows the way, it is up to one to catch up fast with faith. Have faith on a stone, Bagavan appears. Jai Sri Krishna --------------------------- Dear Sadhakom There is a hot response for my posting. Thank you all for giving me an opportunity to explain what I said and try to answer your questions. Before that I want to mention 3 of points here: (a) We all who participated in this posting believe in God, I believe we differ in how we perceive God. I do not see and do not expect you would see this as an anomaly as we are all seeking the same target in different paths (types of yoga). (b) All sadhaks may not be at the same level of sadhana and making spiritual progress at same speed. I may be at basic level and you may be at advanced stages. There is no measure to it. © Please show tolerance / constraint to different view points – when you have 6 billion people, they all could be different. Being in the advanced stages, a sadhak will show more constraint towards others (I do not need to read or quote from Gita for this simple fundamental on human relations) Since our moderator advised brevity, I will try to follow the same, but cannot be sure of the same: I studied Gita (mainly the first 7 chapters repeatedly and others once) and was relating many of the down-to-earth messages of Gitacharya to my own personal life to remove tensions, developing relationship with my fellow citizens around and writing my own observations in a dairy. When I joined this forum, the topics postings suggested to me the sadhaks are in advanced stage of saadhana. As I went through the communication, I was not clear on some statements from the sadhaks connected with postings like `samaadhi / moksha', expressions like `soul leaving body' if they have visualized these states and responding. If I were you I would not venture to answer the posting like on samaadhi vs moksha, without experiencing both the states. So my posting was to get some clarity on the practice / examples own experiences. Mike – I understood your writing then and now the same way, no disagreement with you on it. I only brought an additional point, in support of viewing Gita from different angles. Gita is neither directly nor indirectly suggesting us to switch off our brains. Use our skills and intellect, question our way up so we may progress and make the progress in a best way – is what I meant by `yogah karmasu kousalam', is also stated in Gita again as `muktasanjna karma samaacharh'. On rebirth, let me know how the following contradicts Gita? God is of many forms. For simplicity of understanding, let us say divine (purusha or Lord) form and non-divine form (prakriti – Nature). If I consider divine form as a divine ocean (water), man takes birth as the water enters into a bottle. Water + bottle(B) = man. There could be different men B1, B2, B3 etc.We identify the characteristics of the bottle (the color, the shape) to water also, so we see different men (with different colors and shapes). When death arrives, bottle breaks and water gets back to the ocean. After death, there is no B1, B2 and B3, right? It is all gone back to divine form (to God). In ocean you do cannot trace the water thrown back. There will be births from the ocean, but nothing cannot be called `rebirth'. Sorry I cannot prove it, no way different from that you cannot prove rebirths – other than believing our scriptures. Its 50: 50 chance, right? But see this: If rebirths are to be accepted as the fact (other than just belief), there has be to be 1:1. (I am taking India as an example here) How come the population exploded from 350 million to about 1000 million in about last 35 years and not before? Are we to assume that more living beings are transmuting to human beings now? I am not suggesting the above is truth, but a view point. I am open to criticism here, but be logical in what you say. Man has to pay for his own karma in this birth itself that is very much evident. If I negligently drive the car, I am sure to make accidents. Gita warns us to be more responsible and be skillful in our actions or karma. Again like I said I am focusing on Gita messages which are down-to-earth, I am not there yet where I have experienced God in every human being and treated them the same way, no I am not there yet. Vyasji At the times Gita was documented, our ancestors do not have as much writing / editing tools that have today. They have documented what has been practiced by many for 100s of years before in a very brief manner. That is the reason there are so many written commentaries about same one Gita from different great people later and there could be other reasons also. Different perspectives!! God has given man intellect and an area of independence. Within that area man has the control and beyond it others, society, nature and God. We need to use that to the fullest extent before seeking help from God. This is not `egoism', this is use of the God-gifted assets. Use intellect and do karmas skillfully, but do not desire the fruits. Desire for fruits causes expectations, microscopic changes in brain. These changes are waiting forces (papas or sins) which will spring up, when the expectations are not met, causing uncontrollable emotions for men. Is that not a rational? Is that not what our modern psychology saying? 1000s of years after Gita said the truth!! The more I see the rationality behind Gita messages, the more my admiration grows to Gitacharya. Your question on rebirth, hut and palace, difference between children of same parents. Hut and palace – how is this connected with a rebirth? If parents are wealthy, children are born in palace. By your statement, you believe that who are born in huts have done (sins), in palace have done virtues (Punya). Do not you see that is just chance but not karma? If so, how come Gandhi is not born in a hut chooses to live in huts to be close to common man? Obama, born of a poorman, now is US president. Gandhi is great because he made great karmas, not because he was born great!! Accidents – since you believe in karma, you asked such question. Did you every try blindly running across a heavy traffic of cars? You would not and I would not, because we know it is not safe, nothing to do with past life karma. Same thing with accidents. To answer your questions, when accidents happened more people died when they did not wear safety helmets / safety belts. If your statement has to be true, we do not need courts to punish criminals, because every task is governed by past life karma. Sorry about it!! Difference in children of the same parents - it is all due to DNA – genetic. If you are interested and want to be rational, you can search internet on `DNA', you will get tons of information. I did not understand your question on Krishna, sorry so I cannot answer the same. Critical examination – this word may have pained you and may be others also, I apologize if it did. That's what happens when our beliefs are hurt. I went through this painful experience when I read `Indian Philosophy' by former Indian President S.Radhakrishnan, which talks about how the 6 systems of Indian philosophy have originated, scriptures – Vedas, Upanishads and epics were (and what times) compiled. My beliefs to perceive God in human form (like Vishnu, Shiva etc) was deeply hurt. However, I had go through that pain and overcome that to now have broader belief system. Please do not be under the impression that `critical examination' is going aginst a system or philosophy. Its mindset to probe and ask questions to gather more information about whatever you do /read or study. I am not saying `right' information. Certain things do not sound logical and need deep understanding / reading of other books. Lot of people will be surprised to know that Indian geometry (mathematics) originated from or for `aagama' shastra. (To know more about it type `sulabha sutras' in Google). And now we know that sciences originated and proliferated into many branches from mathematics. So when I read Gita or other puranas, I cannot switch of my rationale if there are some questions around it. I do not think our ancestors expected that too. If so, I am wondering if so many commentaries on Gita or other scriptures are necessary. Shasaikalaji You talked about `luck' and it depends on how define `luck'. Take a minute and try to define the word `luck' or see a dictionary. We use this word in general, whether we believe in it or not, even I use it and I do not believe in it. There is positive way of having `luck' and conventional way of using it. If some one gets lottery or promotion or money, we say `he is lucky'. Is that what you mean? I consider I am lucky when I read a nice poem in `bhagavatam' that God gave me a mind to enjoy to my fullest extent. Can a billionaire enjoy that poem as much as I do if God has not given him that mind (bank balance does not change it). He can buy a top model car/ building, not the mind. He has to use his own, good or bad. Holy Gita, Ramayana or Bharata – God never said follow everything blindly. When it occurs to your brain, even if it is Vedas, Upanishads, please do have question on that, but most obediently, so the beliefs are not hurt. Your questions enrich your belief, like I explained in my note to Vyasji. Energy comes to us when we are open to criticism and same way we lose energy when we react negatively to a criticism. We are human beings with emotions. So being a science student is not that I am a scientist or any big person, the tendency to be inquisitive. Mind and belief – Can you define `mind' for me? Its is difficult, of course, our dictionaries provide definition, you can say it a `collection of thoughts, feelings and emotions'. Your beliefs come out of your `mind' and are an intense emotion. Belief is one you think is right (whether that is right or wrong for society or others). You may derive the knowledge your belief from books, parents, society and they are likely to change naturally or by force. I believe that `Vaada' is very important aspect of learning and being open about `vaada' is equally important too, I would encourage you to read the chronology of Indian scriptures, so we will have a better perspective of how much our ancestors struggled to store their wisdom for us, how they transmitted the same through generations. Sorry I took lot of your time/space, Moderatorji!!! Venu Komanduri SUMMARY OF SADHAK RESPONSES Ram Ram - No scripture recommends only tattva-vada (reading/discussing only) - Interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! - Sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal. It addresses principles and practice of ideal human conduct. All issues can be addressed. - As clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner, clarity increases - " tattva darshibhih " remain only SAT (Existence) - " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16) - Sadhak is to be tattva darsibhi (by living/practicing 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). - It is no about simply waiting for God to do. - It is by means of sadhak's actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. - The great souls, these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. - Surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan and all vasanas will be eradicated - Bhagwan will reveal himself to his children and bring his children together in the way they resort to Him. - Have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for yourr life (lessons from other pilgrims) - Implementing Gita teachings - KEY to betterment - Practices Gita in one's life probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion - Yes! one has to " live " Gita principles. There is no doubt, No contradiction. - Without cause-effect (rebirth), what causes such inequanimity in births, situations, circumstances etc.? - Critical Examination of Gita/God, is it possible? - Paramatma is not easily conquerable by our critical thinking etc. - Aren't Mind / Belief opposite / separate subjects altogether? - No need to believe in theories, believe your own experience - God and His creation are all one - WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life. KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFEBELT - GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. - THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth. Ram Ram ---------------------------- NEW POSTING -Shree Hari- Dear Venu Komanduri, Thanks for your comments on my post. I like to mention to you at first, that I have spent my whole life in the field of electronics, logic was one of my favorite subjects. There came a time in my life when logic, and common sense were confounded. (You will have to take my word on that, there will be hundreds of sadhaks who will understand what I am saying). Actually I was putting the opposite spin on the common view, that is practicing intuitively, maybe from the inner conscience a way of life, searching all avenues for answer to the paradoxes of existence. One must remember, there are many great souls in the world who have never heard of the Bhagavad Gita, and when they come across it they are amazed. Analize carefully what I wrote: 'It is by means of their actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives.' I really do not think I implied one should await for GOD, if it appeared that way I apologize. B.G. 11: Prostrating in adoration, do I crave Forgiveness: as a father forgives his son, A friend his dear friend, and a lover his love†" Thus even so should You forgive Me, O God. (44 Overjoyed am I, seeing Your form, and yet My mind is distracted with terror. Show me, In mercy Lord, only Your previous form†" O Lord of gods, Abode of the universe. (45 Purely out of interest what do you make of that from a logical approach. You ask about transition, it can come slowly a gently path, or fierce and fast, like fire. But whatever, " You keep chopping wood, and fetching water " . B.G. 2: Attached to pleasure and power Their minds are drawn away by this Speech, and to them is not granted The insight from meditation. (44) The introspective ones I talk of, ponder meditate, these 'Pilgrims', prefer a quiet life, you know scientists, technocrats, woodchoppers, whatever, but they do not seek glory. To quote you: 'I do not trust in rebirth, saying that 'people suffer from the karma of previous births' Talking of Yogis, or Yogis to be: Yoga Aphorism: Concentration II: (39). When he is fixed in none receiving, he gets the memory of past life. B.G. 18 And even that man who hears this, Full of faith and free from scoffing, He, liberated, shall attain The happy worlds of the righteous. (71) Has this been heard, O Pritha’s son, By you with a one-pointed mind? Moreover, has the delusion Of your ignorance been destroyed? (72) Arjuna said: Yea, destroyed is my delusion, And I have gained my memory Through Your grace, and my doubts are gone. I am firm; I will do Your word. (73) I hope my friend I have answers some of your questions, I can only tell you the truth as I see it. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ---------------------------- Hari Om Dear Mr Venu It is great to note that your kind self respects Gita except some portions of it. I have few questions. Kindly oblige by replying to the same. Please use your rational/logical mind and sharp intellect while responding so that we may reap maximum benefits. What is that " cleverness " which you referred while giving your version of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " ? Since you don't believe in rebirth, hence by your logical and rational sharp mind/intellect/ego please enlighten us as to how one child gets born in a hut and another in a palace? Is it pure coincidence or there are some laws behind the same? Why one should abstain from evil conduct? Why not, at least when one is sure of death, one should reap maximum pleasure from the world , by whatever means, as there will no rebirth to pay for_ Since there are no sins/virtues accumulating? What/Who leaves a live body so as to make it a corpse? How come 2 children of same parents have differences, inspite of living in same environment? How come in an accident one survives while another does not? Your more learned views are also solicited on that " karma kanda/swarga bhog " verses of Gitaji referred by you. What according to you may be the reasons of Lord Krishna advising us not to fall prey to the enticement of Karma Kand of Vedas? You said Sir that Krishna lives in all beings. Can you enlighten us as to why and for what time and since when? " Critical examination of Gita " - what according to you makes that necessary? Who is qualified to conduct that examination? What should be the basis of such exercise? How it should be conducted- any yardsticks in your logical/rationale mind ? Your elaborate views are solicited for benefit of us all. Most of the Sadhaks in this forum , including me, have more belief than logic/rationale. Your association and contribution therefore should enrich us. May be in the end you also walk out richer too. I trust you will respond " positively " . Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Jai Hanuman Venuji Maharaj ! I noted your kind advice to our Brother Mike Keenor . I quote below the last para - Kindly elaborate as to what is this " belief " ? Being a science student yourself and luckily ( " luckily " -since you don't believe in rebirth etc-or you don't believe in " luck " also ?) you also have mind and sharp intellect. Naturally , therefore, you critically evaluate everything before any acceptance- even if that is Holy Gita. Then what is this animal called " belief " which you referred in your elaborate advice to Mike Bhaiyya? Where then, Jee, is space for " belief " in your critical/sharp/logical/rational/thinking/evaluating/analytical/energe tic as well as energy producing/imaginative mind and intellect? Are not mind and belief two different and opposite subjects altogether? Like North Pole and South Pole? Bolo Jee! Boliye Sir !! Waiting for a positive response, Jee. Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram What " rationale " what " critical exam " We think, God is that easily conquerable by us? by our rationale and critical examination? Until one realizes the a speck on nothingness that we are compared to God ...then and then only true knowledge will reveal itself (rather we will allow it to flow into us) . We are like that upside down bowl, when it is raining. Swamiji has given this example... that the rain is pouring equallly on all. What can God do if we chose to keep our bowl, upside down? He is equally accessible to all. No one is forcing one to believe. Let us believe in our own experience. All our lives we have been learning only from " cause and effect " no other reason. We avoid fire, because sometime or the other we felt the heat and knew it to be dangerous. We learn from our mistakes, because there is a consequence. There is a price to be paid. We don't need to believe in theories as Swamiji says, just believe in our own experiences(anubhav). Ram Ram ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om. Hinduism never never compels one to read Gita at any point of one's life. There may be crores of hindus pass by their birth without even looking at HOLY GITA. Krushna has never uttered a word that everyone should surely read GIta. Krushna has given us Gita not to just read it and please HIM!!!!!!! He has taken pity on each and everyone of us!!!! We really dont understand the birth cycle at all !!!!! TO Krushna is attached the Vishnu Maya and Krushna is OMNI PRESENT in PRACRUTHI (Nature) !!!! WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life !!!! We keep facing cyclone after cyclone and we get lost in this action of pracruthi (Nature) !!!! Some start losing faith in God as they are shaken as disaster after disaster ruin their life !!!! This continues till we surrender to Krushna and take Gita in our hand. Here comes a great change in our life as KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFE BELT ---GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. He explains in detail the dimensions of nature-pracruthi, what our body is made of, what our mind does, what our intellect does, what is SATH CHITH. He has taken great care to educate us on Sthira Bhuddhi, Ignorance and true knowledge. THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth !!!!! So interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! With regards, Usha Sridhar. ---------------------------- Hari Om Dear Sadhak Venu ! What is your question? I wonder if any sadhak contradicted what you mean to say ! Yes- one has to " live " Gita principles. How and where there is doubt on the same? Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B ---------------------------- Re:Tatwa vaadibhi to tatva darsibhi Venu Komanduri is absolutely right: the ultimate aim is tatva darsibhi, though tatva darsibhi may be the initial step towards that. If an individual gets too attached to discussions and interpretation on Gita, the focus on practice to become tatva darsibhi may be lost. And, when one practices Gita in one's life it is probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion on Gita. I am sure God will help and direct you along the path. If you have learnt that God and His creation are all one, realize that by living your life on that principle even as you have to act as a person distict from others. Difficult. But I try this path hoping that one day God will ensure successful transition to Oneness. Basudeb Sen ---------------------------- Dear Sadhak Community There is a nice response from Mike Keenor, nice in the sense there is outpouring positivism. I approached Gita in many ways - scientific, athiestic and spiritual. From all the angles I see there is immense wisdom stored in Gita. Ever since I have been studying Gita, specially the last 2 years, I am amazed at the down to earth messages. So I remain on earth and talk about the practical messages clearly indicated, they are neither hidden nor hinted, in Gita. Being a science student and in engineering profession, I always question things / dictum before my mind sees the rationale behind them - be it Vedas / Gita or otherwise. There are many slokas in Gita that showers the life management principles even if I study them as an athiest - ignore the fruits of desires (twaktaphalam), live in the 9-holed town (navadwarava pure dehi). Only to say 'critical examination of any scripture' is utmost necessary, I quote from Gita ( 2:42, 2:43, 2:44 ) which suggested not get trapped by the 'karma kanda' /'swargabhoga' (the rituals and the pleasures of the heaven) in the early part of Vedas. That is being rational about the objective of Gita. Despite my strong faith and belief in Gita, I do not trust in rebirth, saying that 'people suffer from the karma of previous births', 'concept of sin / virtue' as account maintained by God or some power. No! I do not!! There can be many interpretations to those words / usages in Gita. Remember that though Gita was documented in 2nd century AD, the slokas were known even before 1500 BC. We are 3500 years from the source and its meaning. Mike - I like your positivism, but Gita is also suggesting 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - meaning there is controllable part the sadhak has to do (not waiting for God's hand), wherever he cannot, he should seek help from others (remember God lives in all). For all this sport of activities, the energy comes from the positivism / belief / imagination /critical thinking /relating the messages to the practical difficulties of life. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram The KARMA issue will be addressed as a separate topic. Kindly stay with one topic and subject at hand. Gita Talk Moderators, Ram Ram ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear Venu Komanduri, B.G. 4 In whatever way they resort To Me do I thus reward them. It is My path which ev'rywhere All men follow, O Arjuna. (11). People the world over from many different faiths, or even non faiths, who started their journey so very long ago, who hear as it were the ringing of the sacred bells, and have a yearning in their hearts for the unknown Beloved, they feel that Love, they know it is there. Do you not think that Divine Krishna would not take his children by the hand and show them the way home, 'The last miles'. It is by means of their actions by their morality and there love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. Do you think HE would not bring his children together so they may find comfort, be supported and support others in Divine Forum. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ----------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Wonderful dear Venu. In other words, you are telling us all to shut up! Yes that is very much required for any serious seeker. You are very right … no scripture recommends tattva-vada. Definitely, tattva-vada can be a potential plague … most often, it is better to be ignorant rather than being a tattava-vadin: Andhantamah pravishanti ye avidyaamupaasate | Tato bhuya iva te tamo ye u vidyaayaam rataah || But, … is there any other way toward becoming a tattva-darshin? Manasaivedamaaptavyam neha naanaasti kinchana || We have to retrace the same path in which we collected our garbage (ignorance and inertia) to remove the same – our minds and bodies. You know, the vaccine is in the very germ! We have to turn the same germ against itself to releive ourselves from our deseases. We are helpless but to indulge in this vada (fight with our own bodily and mental demands) to remove the ignorance and inertia harbored within. The darshana (attainment of peace) is an eventuality of the vada (the war within). No war … no peace! No war within is a suicide in other words … Tangste pretyaabhigacchhanti ye kechaatmahano janaah || One who persihes without fighting the ignorance and inertia harbored within is the worst of all suicides. Therefore, a true vada (a truthful fight against one's own ignorance and inertia - you may want to call the vaccine, Tattva Vimarsha) is very essential to attain The Peace (Tattva Darshana) … after all a war is a war … things can go wrong … but it is definitely better than a suicide … definitely better than being consumed by our own tendencies as time passes over rendering no resistance like a pashu … Off course, the vada has the most vicious side effect that it itself can become the biggest vasana … well, as far as one is cognizant of the vada and its vicuous side effects, it is good and … that is the only way. The clouds of our ignorance and inertia become thinner and thinner as our truthfulness in our Tattva Vada intensifies in our internal search for the truth (Vada should be pitched against one's own well- established stupidity NOT ON THE STUPIDITY WISHFULLY PERCEIVED IN OTHERS!). Clarity of the truth (Tattva darshana) naturally increases as the clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner and thinner … it is an eventuality that we look forward to so that we can finally perform your wonderful suggestion – SHUT UP! Till then … let us poor things perform the ritual waging the war within. Once in a while, please keep peeping in to remind us that we really wage it only for the correct reason (to burn the ignorance within) and only on the correct targets (to uproot the inertia within). That is helpful. THANK YOU. Respects. Naga Narayana ------------------------------- Dear sadaks, Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' This is what Bagavan said to Arjuna. Bagavan said, " What is use of knowing all knowledge when I (bagavan) is right in front of you " . Means do not worry of Sadanas, Karmas, Scripts, knowledge on Sat etc when the SAT (bagavan) has comes. That is surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan who will take care of all the good what knowledge could give and also eradicate all vasanas, Karmas by HIS sankalpa itself. We have been trying over several births and still landing here. But if Bagavan tries you, the there is no any obstacle to liberate. But if Bagavan wants to try one, then he must have Niskama Prema Bakthi, which Bagavan has said in Geetha. Jai Sri Krishna baiya sathyanarayan =========================================== Happy new year 2009 to all sadhaks Thanks for your co-operation and guide regarding Gita 2.16 pawan singhal -------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The Q of Venuji had two facets. One re the object of this Satsanga Forum. While I am not in any way a Founder of this Forum but as I see there is a common thread binding all Sadhaks - Swamiji Shri Ramsukhdasji Maharaj and Holy Gita. The sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal- beyond all faiths and religions- covering humanity at large. This forum is in my view at present " evolving " and the deliberations are getting divine and divine. We , in fact, can easily state that we are part of a Jnana Yagya within the meaning of Holy Gita. Hence I don't see any limitations on the scope of this forum. Since Holy Gita encompasses entire humanity , both principles and practice of ideal human conduct - I see nothing wrong in our addressing any type of problems faced by Sadhaks in their spiritual journey. All my personal views as one of the many Sadhaks of this divine group. Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Dear all , Yes , if we can implement the teachings of gita , in our day to day living , not only will it make life Less stressful , but more meaningful . After all we live in our communities and mingle / work / interact, so i Feel as long as we understand The true meaning (spirit of the message ) of the message sought to be Conveyed by the gita and try & Impact the same in our lives , things will be much better . In short ,what we want to be is better human beings , because only than can we be better Parents / children / friends / spouses /sadhaks / teachers/ Rgds Arvind Malhotra ---------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The very existence is " SAT " . Those who have experienced the characteristics of " SAT " and ever changing function of nature- " ASAT " , they in practice experience " their obvious , self proven, natural, automatic positioning in the existence viz SAT . In their experience there is nothing known as ASAT existing. In other words in their experience only SAT is existing- nothing else is existing. Such great people are called " tattva darshibhih " . In their experience only their positioning in SAT- imperishable, permanent, ever present existence- remains. Through that positioning they get highest rewards. In BG 2:16- the term " ubhayorapi " - represents " conscience " ! " Antah " - represents " element knowledge " !! " Drishtah " - represents " experience " !!! Meaning thereby that " conscience has transformed ( " transition " term as used by the questioner) in to the experiential knowledge and now what has remained is SAT - existence only! This is the highest state of Jnana Yoga!! The Highest reward! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16). Swamiji has been very clear about this... " Real " (Sat) is our natural state. Natural is what needs no effort. It is ever attained. It simply IS. Be situate in it. The essence (Real) is always there - will always be there. The real is not created. The unreal is created from the Real, stays in the real and then merges in the real. It has no existence of its own. One has to simply give importance to ones own experience. No need to believe in the scriptures. Your existence always IS. What is NOT can never exist. The IS always remains IS. To experience 'I AM', no effort is required. No practice. There is no doubt of our existence. The real essence is our existence. The base, the foundation of all appearance - of all creation. That is Paramatma (Supreme Consciousness,God). Meera Das Ram Ram ---------------------------- This is the sanest stuff I heard in a while! Hare Krishna! Gurunath Prakash ---------------------------- GITA TALK GROUP GUIDELINES: 1. Purpose of the group is to help Sadhakas clarify their doubts related to Gitaji shalokas. Therefore, responses which further clarify the understanding of Gitaji, will only be posted. 2. Wherever possible, please quote Gitaji or other scriptures to substantiate your response. 3. Kindly limit personal feelings, opinions, beliefs etc. to the extent that they further help in understanding the Gita shlokas 4. Please be as concise and to the point as possible, respecting sadhaka's time. 5. Kindly focus your writing to the subject at hand only. 6. Please do not include links to the other sites or other organizations. 7. Kindly do not include your personal information such as phone number, address etc. 8. Please do not address the response to a particular individual since the message is going to the entire group. 9. Due to the large readership, all responses may not be posted. 10. Moderator at his discretion, may modify the posting, if content is unclear or not appropriate for distribution to the group. 11. Please respond taking into consideration the novices, youth, westerners, non-sectarian audience. Kindly limit the use to Sanskrit words only, rather provide the English word with Sanskrit bracketed wherever possible. MODERATOR Ram Ram ------------------------ Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 Dear Sadhak Community (1) Is the purpose of this forum only to discuss the meaning behind Gita slokas? and / or (2) interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life? (By practical life, I mean one living the normal life while in the quest for God, Gita does not shun the karma, but the attachment towards it) While I understand both are important, Gita is directing its readers like us to grow from Tatwa vaadibhi (one who reads and discusses about the essential element) to tatva darsibhi (one who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat'). I am particularly and practically interested in this transition, because some of the comments from my fellow sadhaks like 'then the soul leaves the body','everything has nothing, while nothing has every thing' while the same people are also suggesting 'no one may have seen God' 'Tatvadarsibhi' (who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat') is referred in Gita 2:16 of Sankhya Yoga. Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' here. Let me know your views on the transition. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- FOLLOW-UP Gita also says - 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - not waiting for God's hand. ---------------------------- NEW POSTING -Shree Hari- Dear Venu Komanduri, Firstly I will reiterate what I first quoted: Yoga Aphorism Concentration II 39 : When he is fixed in non-receiving he gets the memory of past life. Swami Vivekananda made no bones about, it he said the memory of past life is the first power a yogi obtains. Now you can say all of this is lunacy, that really is fine by me. Lord Krishna told Arjuna about the reality of rebirth/past life. Chapter 2 Even as a man casts off his worn-out clothes And then clothes himself in others which are new So the embodied casts off worn-out bodies And then enters into others which are new. (22) Of that which is born, death is sure, Of that which is dead, birth is sure. Over the unavoidable, Therefore you never should lament. (27) Chapter 4 The Holy Lord said: Many the births that I have passed– Many passed by you, Arjuna. I have full knowledge of them all, While you do not, Scorcher of Foes. (5) Many more examples, I am not sure how one rationalizes this to mean something else. Actually I will tell you something, if you apply fierce logic in your quest, not backing away from your task to be at one with the universal truth, then all your questions will melt away, but hold onto your hat! 'It is by means of their actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives.' With all due respect your water bottle analogy is like comparing, sardines to bananas. Looking at the logic of the water analogy no mater what form or where those molecules go, they remain those molecules. Now the eternal self is not mega water molecules, but the individual eternal soul, that may become part of the whole plain of oneness but remains like a water molecule that one individual, just like the one water molecule now in the ocean is existent for all of existence. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike (Keenor). --------------------------- Dear sadaks, Sri Venu Komandurisays-- Bagavan suggests tattva darsibhi is better and there is NO appeal. !08 upanashids mentions here and there that it (Upanashids) unable to describe GOD. They why strain on tattva vadibhi. By sticking and practicing SAT? Means deataching to objects and emotions, strongly knowing in mind the dear and near can collapse any time, one came alone and goes alone, all things on earth is only visible by Maya, amount of input of attachment is sorrow of same amount later, Maanusha degam Dullabam, just pretend that one is affectionate, attached, caring and perform actions (karmas) only at body level, always in Anniyachitha of Bagavan. Talking about SAT one has abosolutely NO knowledge how IT is. Can just say what imagined or very little known. One does not see Air but can feel. God is very clearly said HE is Apprameyam. Means no pramanam, not object, cannot be seen or felt by any human senses. Then HIS sankalpa to take a form and show us HIS vision. In Srimat Bagavat it is very clear about GOD told by Elephant Gajendra- HE is AKKILA KARANAM, ARPUTHA KARANAM, NISH KARANAM. May be it contradictory but has wonderful message that is said in Bagavath Geetha Transition- Like birds migrating from one place to other. Like changing cloths. In Saffire dress or Pyjama, or suit you are the same person. When Jeva leaves it takes with it it`s own Karmas, Vasanas, Dana & Dharm, Paapa & Puniya etc that was experienced on earth and NOTHING materialistically from earth. In case Jeeva leaves without anything said above, it travels on Archanathi Marg northern side of earth and reaches Paramathuma. Jai Sri Krishna B.Sathyanarayan ----------------------- Venuji, please clarify your perspective. In my eyes there appear to be vaccilation between belief and mind. Thakurlingam ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear sadaks, Once soul leaves the body, it takes nothing of worldly things is the meaning. A crorepathi on death can never carry with him anything, even his body except his own cause and effects (Karmas). Of course many has seen GOD in the past. But we never believed them. We insulted them as " Chitta Brama " . We never knew their Chitta was with Brama. Mother Andal in SriRangam has seen God. Thrirupan Alwar, Nandanar, Kannaper, Samartha Ramadoss, Bradrachalla Ramadoss, Shridi Sai Baba, Ramana Rishi, Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa showed God to Vivekanath. Paramathuma is NOT object has been discussed so many times. HE is to be known through Gyana/Bakthi. In Srimath Bagavath it is said that Bakthi Maatha unable to wake up her 2 children Gyana and Virag as Kali was Born. For a person with poorna faith, he can see God in many. For a person with distrubed & uncertain faith, even if God appears he will start thinking whether it is illusion, just like Duryodan saw Viswaroop. For Valmiki with years of Ram Naam Ant hill covering him, never lost faith. Fraction of faith lost, will show no any results. Though in Bible, the example is nice. Christ was walking on water. A disciple also wanted to walk on water. Christ said come. He walked on water. But as he was waliking on water, a doubt came in his mind , " What if I sink " . He sank. Christ said to disciple, " When you lost faith- faithlessness sank you " . Sri Ragavendar Swamy in his teen age gave food to Sri Krishna Idol which never ate. He profusly cried to extent of fainting, Sri Krishna came and ate. So was in case of Namadev. Mother Yasoda said today I will tie up Krishna. She tried with a rope and it was getting short of 2 Inches. When she surrendered to Sri Krishna saying with love,' Oh Krishna I cannot tie you. Bagavan gave HIS hip to be tied. Bakthi (physical surrender), intellect (Mind surrender), faith (Budhi Surrender) known as Trikarna Sudhi, Bagavan appears in the form you desire. Purpose of this forum is to impart Gyana so that one can see God. Guru (this forum) shows the way, it is up to one to catch up fast with faith. Have faith on a stone, Bagavan appears. Jai Sri Krishna --------------------------- Dear Sadhakom There is a hot response for my posting. Thank you all for giving me an opportunity to explain what I said and try to answer your questions. Before that I want to mention 3 of points here: (a) We all who participated in this posting believe in God, I believe we differ in how we perceive God. I do not see and do not expect you would see this as an anomaly as we are all seeking the same target in different paths (types of yoga). (b) All sadhaks may not be at the same level of sadhana and making spiritual progress at same speed. I may be at basic level and you may be at advanced stages. There is no measure to it. © Please show tolerance / constraint to different view points – when you have 6 billion people, they all could be different. Being in the advanced stages, a sadhak will show more constraint towards others (I do not need to read or quote from Gita for this simple fundamental on human relations) Since our moderator advised brevity, I will try to follow the same, but cannot be sure of the same: I studied Gita (mainly the first 7 chapters repeatedly and others once) and was relating many of the down-to-earth messages of Gitacharya to my own personal life to remove tensions, developing relationship with my fellow citizens around and writing my own observations in a dairy. When I joined this forum, the topics postings suggested to me the sadhaks are in advanced stage of saadhana. As I went through the communication, I was not clear on some statements from the sadhaks connected with postings like `samaadhi / moksha', expressions like `soul leaving body' if they have visualized these states and responding. If I were you I would not venture to answer the posting like on samaadhi vs moksha, without experiencing both the states. So my posting was to get some clarity on the practice / examples own experiences. Mike – I understood your writing then and now the same way, no disagreement with you on it. I only brought an additional point, in support of viewing Gita from different angles. Gita is neither directly nor indirectly suggesting us to switch off our brains. Use our skills and intellect, question our way up so we may progress and make the progress in a best way – is what I meant by `yogah karmasu kousalam', is also stated in Gita again as `muktasanjna karma samaacharh'. On rebirth, let me know how the following contradicts Gita? God is of many forms. For simplicity of understanding, let us say divine (purusha or Lord) form and non-divine form (prakriti – Nature). If I consider divine form as a divine ocean (water), man takes birth as the water enters into a bottle. Water + bottle(B) = man. There could be different men B1, B2, B3 etc.We identify the characteristics of the bottle (the color, the shape) to water also, so we see different men (with different colors and shapes). When death arrives, bottle breaks and water gets back to the ocean. After death, there is no B1, B2 and B3, right? It is all gone back to divine form (to God). In ocean you do cannot trace the water thrown back. There will be births from the ocean, but nothing cannot be called `rebirth'. Sorry I cannot prove it, no way different from that you cannot prove rebirths – other than believing our scriptures. Its 50: 50 chance, right? But see this: If rebirths are to be accepted as the fact (other than just belief), there has be to be 1:1. (I am taking India as an example here) How come the population exploded from 350 million to about 1000 million in about last 35 years and not before? Are we to assume that more living beings are transmuting to human beings now? I am not suggesting the above is truth, but a view point. I am open to criticism here, but be logical in what you say. Man has to pay for his own karma in this birth itself that is very much evident. If I negligently drive the car, I am sure to make accidents. Gita warns us to be more responsible and be skillful in our actions or karma. Again like I said I am focusing on Gita messages which are down-to-earth, I am not there yet where I have experienced God in every human being and treated them the same way, no I am not there yet. Vyasji At the times Gita was documented, our ancestors do not have as much writing / editing tools that have today. They have documented what has been practiced by many for 100s of years before in a very brief manner. That is the reason there are so many written commentaries about same one Gita from different great people later and there could be other reasons also. Different perspectives!! God has given man intellect and an area of independence. Within that area man has the control and beyond it others, society, nature and God. We need to use that to the fullest extent before seeking help from God. This is not `egoism', this is use of the God-gifted assets. Use intellect and do karmas skillfully, but do not desire the fruits. Desire for fruits causes expectations, microscopic changes in brain. These changes are waiting forces (papas or sins) which will spring up, when the expectations are not met, causing uncontrollable emotions for men. Is that not a rational? Is that not what our modern psychology saying? 1000s of years after Gita said the truth!! The more I see the rationality behind Gita messages, the more my admiration grows to Gitacharya. Your question on rebirth, hut and palace, difference between children of same parents. Hut and palace – how is this connected with a rebirth? If parents are wealthy, children are born in palace. By your statement, you believe that who are born in huts have done (sins), in palace have done virtues (Punya). Do not you see that is just chance but not karma? If so, how come Gandhi is not born in a hut chooses to live in huts to be close to common man? Obama, born of a poorman, now is US president. Gandhi is great because he made great karmas, not because he was born great!! Accidents – since you believe in karma, you asked such question. Did you every try blindly running across a heavy traffic of cars? You would not and I would not, because we know it is not safe, nothing to do with past life karma. Same thing with accidents. To answer your questions, when accidents happened more people died when they did not wear safety helmets / safety belts. If your statement has to be true, we do not need courts to punish criminals, because every task is governed by past life karma. Sorry about it!! Difference in children of the same parents - it is all due to DNA – genetic. If you are interested and want to be rational, you can search internet on `DNA', you will get tons of information. I did not understand your question on Krishna, sorry so I cannot answer the same. Critical examination – this word may have pained you and may be others also, I apologize if it did. That's what happens when our beliefs are hurt. I went through this painful experience when I read `Indian Philosophy' by former Indian President S.Radhakrishnan, which talks about how the 6 systems of Indian philosophy have originated, scriptures – Vedas, Upanishads and epics were (and what times) compiled. My beliefs to perceive God in human form (like Vishnu, Shiva etc) was deeply hurt. However, I had go through that pain and overcome that to now have broader belief system. Please do not be under the impression that `critical examination' is going aginst a system or philosophy. Its mindset to probe and ask questions to gather more information about whatever you do /read or study. I am not saying `right' information. Certain things do not sound logical and need deep understanding / reading of other books. Lot of people will be surprised to know that Indian geometry (mathematics) originated from or for `aagama' shastra. (To know more about it type `sulabha sutras' in Google). And now we know that sciences originated and proliferated into many branches from mathematics. So when I read Gita or other puranas, I cannot switch of my rationale if there are some questions around it. I do not think our ancestors expected that too. If so, I am wondering if so many commentaries on Gita or other scriptures are necessary. Shasaikalaji You talked about `luck' and it depends on how define `luck'. Take a minute and try to define the word `luck' or see a dictionary. We use this word in general, whether we believe in it or not, even I use it and I do not believe in it. There is positive way of having `luck' and conventional way of using it. If some one gets lottery or promotion or money, we say `he is lucky'. Is that what you mean? I consider I am lucky when I read a nice poem in `bhagavatam' that God gave me a mind to enjoy to my fullest extent. Can a billionaire enjoy that poem as much as I do if God has not given him that mind (bank balance does not change it). He can buy a top model car/ building, not the mind. He has to use his own, good or bad. Holy Gita, Ramayana or Bharata – God never said follow everything blindly. When it occurs to your brain, even if it is Vedas, Upanishads, please do have question on that, but most obediently, so the beliefs are not hurt. Your questions enrich your belief, like I explained in my note to Vyasji. Energy comes to us when we are open to criticism and same way we lose energy when we react negatively to a criticism. We are human beings with emotions. So being a science student is not that I am a scientist or any big person, the tendency to be inquisitive. Mind and belief – Can you define `mind' for me? Its is difficult, of course, our dictionaries provide definition, you can say it a `collection of thoughts, feelings and emotions'. Your beliefs come out of your `mind' and are an intense emotion. Belief is one you think is right (whether that is right or wrong for society or others). You may derive the knowledge your belief from books, parents, society and they are likely to change naturally or by force. I believe that `Vaada' is very important aspect of learning and being open about `vaada' is equally important too, I would encourage you to read the chronology of Indian scriptures, so we will have a better perspective of how much our ancestors struggled to store their wisdom for us, how they transmitted the same through generations. Sorry I took lot of your time/space, Moderatorji!!! Venu Komanduri SUMMARY OF SADHAK RESPONSES Ram Ram - No scripture recommends only tattva-vada (reading/discussing only) - Interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! - Sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal. It addresses principles and practice of ideal human conduct. All issues can be addressed. - As clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner, clarity increases - " tattva darshibhih " remain only SAT (Existence) - " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16) - Sadhak is to be tattva darsibhi (by living/practicing 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). - It is no about simply waiting for God to do. - It is by means of sadhak's actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. - The great souls, these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. - Surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan and all vasanas will be eradicated - Bhagwan will reveal himself to his children and bring his children together in the way they resort to Him. - Have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for yourr life (lessons from other pilgrims) - Implementing Gita teachings - KEY to betterment - Practices Gita in one's life probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion - Yes! one has to " live " Gita principles. There is no doubt, No contradiction. - Without cause-effect (rebirth), what causes such inequanimity in births, situations, circumstances etc.? - Critical Examination of Gita/God, is it possible? - Paramatma is not easily conquerable by our critical thinking etc. - Aren't Mind / Belief opposite / separate subjects altogether? - No need to believe in theories, believe your own experience - God and His creation are all one - WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life. KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFEBELT - GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. - THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth. Ram Ram ---------------------------- NEW POSTING -Shree Hari- Dear Venu Komanduri, Thanks for your comments on my post. I like to mention to you at first, that I have spent my whole life in the field of electronics, logic was one of my favorite subjects. There came a time in my life when logic, and common sense were confounded. (You will have to take my word on that, there will be hundreds of sadhaks who will understand what I am saying). Actually I was putting the opposite spin on the common view, that is practicing intuitively, maybe from the inner conscience a way of life, searching all avenues for answer to the paradoxes of existence. One must remember, there are many great souls in the world who have never heard of the Bhagavad Gita, and when they come across it they are amazed. Analize carefully what I wrote: 'It is by means of their actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives.' I really do not think I implied one should await for GOD, if it appeared that way I apologize. B.G. 11: Prostrating in adoration, do I crave Forgiveness: as a father forgives his son, A friend his dear friend, and a lover his love†" Thus even so should You forgive Me, O God. (44 Overjoyed am I, seeing Your form, and yet My mind is distracted with terror. Show me, In mercy Lord, only Your previous form†" O Lord of gods, Abode of the universe. (45 Purely out of interest what do you make of that from a logical approach. You ask about transition, it can come slowly a gently path, or fierce and fast, like fire. But whatever, " You keep chopping wood, and fetching water " . B.G. 2: Attached to pleasure and power Their minds are drawn away by this Speech, and to them is not granted The insight from meditation. (44) The introspective ones I talk of, ponder meditate, these 'Pilgrims', prefer a quiet life, you know scientists, technocrats, woodchoppers, whatever, but they do not seek glory. To quote you: 'I do not trust in rebirth, saying that 'people suffer from the karma of previous births' Talking of Yogis, or Yogis to be: Yoga Aphorism: Concentration II: (39). When he is fixed in none receiving, he gets the memory of past life. B.G. 18 And even that man who hears this, Full of faith and free from scoffing, He, liberated, shall attain The happy worlds of the righteous. (71) Has this been heard, O Pritha’s son, By you with a one-pointed mind? Moreover, has the delusion Of your ignorance been destroyed? (72) Arjuna said: Yea, destroyed is my delusion, And I have gained my memory Through Your grace, and my doubts are gone. I am firm; I will do Your word. (73) I hope my friend I have answers some of your questions, I can only tell you the truth as I see it. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ---------------------------- Hari Om Dear Mr Venu It is great to note that your kind self respects Gita except some portions of it. I have few questions. Kindly oblige by replying to the same. Please use your rational/logical mind and sharp intellect while responding so that we may reap maximum benefits. What is that " cleverness " which you referred while giving your version of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " ? Since you don't believe in rebirth, hence by your logical and rational sharp mind/intellect/ego please enlighten us as to how one child gets born in a hut and another in a palace? Is it pure coincidence or there are some laws behind the same? Why one should abstain from evil conduct? Why not, at least when one is sure of death, one should reap maximum pleasure from the world , by whatever means, as there will no rebirth to pay for_ Since there are no sins/virtues accumulating? What/Who leaves a live body so as to make it a corpse? How come 2 children of same parents have differences, inspite of living in same environment? How come in an accident one survives while another does not? Your more learned views are also solicited on that " karma kanda/swarga bhog " verses of Gitaji referred by you. What according to you may be the reasons of Lord Krishna advising us not to fall prey to the enticement of Karma Kand of Vedas? You said Sir that Krishna lives in all beings. Can you enlighten us as to why and for what time and since when? " Critical examination of Gita " - what according to you makes that necessary? Who is qualified to conduct that examination? What should be the basis of such exercise? How it should be conducted- any yardsticks in your logical/rationale mind ? Your elaborate views are solicited for benefit of us all. Most of the Sadhaks in this forum , including me, have more belief than logic/rationale. Your association and contribution therefore should enrich us. May be in the end you also walk out richer too. I trust you will respond " positively " . Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Jai Hanuman Venuji Maharaj ! I noted your kind advice to our Brother Mike Keenor . I quote below the last para - Kindly elaborate as to what is this " belief " ? Being a science student yourself and luckily ( " luckily " -since you don't believe in rebirth etc-or you don't believe in " luck " also ?) you also have mind and sharp intellect. Naturally , therefore, you critically evaluate everything before any acceptance- even if that is Holy Gita. Then what is this animal called " belief " which you referred in your elaborate advice to Mike Bhaiyya? Where then, Jee, is space for " belief " in your critical/sharp/logical/rational/thinking/evaluating/analytical/energe tic as well as energy producing/imaginative mind and intellect? Are not mind and belief two different and opposite subjects altogether? Like North Pole and South Pole? Bolo Jee! Boliye Sir !! Waiting for a positive response, Jee. Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram What " rationale " what " critical exam " We think, God is that easily conquerable by us? by our rationale and critical examination? Until one realizes the a speck on nothingness that we are compared to God ...then and then only true knowledge will reveal itself (rather we will allow it to flow into us) . We are like that upside down bowl, when it is raining. Swamiji has given this example... that the rain is pouring equallly on all. What can God do if we chose to keep our bowl, upside down? He is equally accessible to all. No one is forcing one to believe. Let us believe in our own experience. All our lives we have been learning only from " cause and effect " no other reason. We avoid fire, because sometime or the other we felt the heat and knew it to be dangerous. We learn from our mistakes, because there is a consequence. There is a price to be paid. We don't need to believe in theories as Swamiji says, just believe in our own experiences(anubhav). Ram Ram ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om. Hinduism never never compels one to read Gita at any point of one's life. There may be crores of hindus pass by their birth without even looking at HOLY GITA. Krushna has never uttered a word that everyone should surely read GIta. Krushna has given us Gita not to just read it and please HIM!!!!!!! He has taken pity on each and everyone of us!!!! We really dont understand the birth cycle at all !!!!! TO Krushna is attached the Vishnu Maya and Krushna is OMNI PRESENT in PRACRUTHI (Nature) !!!! WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life !!!! We keep facing cyclone after cyclone and we get lost in this action of pracruthi (Nature) !!!! Some start losing faith in God as they are shaken as disaster after disaster ruin their life !!!! This continues till we surrender to Krushna and take Gita in our hand. Here comes a great change in our life as KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFE BELT ---GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. He explains in detail the dimensions of nature-pracruthi, what our body is made of, what our mind does, what our intellect does, what is SATH CHITH. He has taken great care to educate us on Sthira Bhuddhi, Ignorance and true knowledge. THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth !!!!! So interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! With regards, Usha Sridhar. ---------------------------- Hari Om Dear Sadhak Venu ! What is your question? I wonder if any sadhak contradicted what you mean to say ! Yes- one has to " live " Gita principles. How and where there is doubt on the same? Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B ---------------------------- Re:Tatwa vaadibhi to tatva darsibhi Venu Komanduri is absolutely right: the ultimate aim is tatva darsibhi, though tatva darsibhi may be the initial step towards that. If an individual gets too attached to discussions and interpretation on Gita, the focus on practice to become tatva darsibhi may be lost. And, when one practices Gita in one's life it is probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion on Gita. I am sure God will help and direct you along the path. If you have learnt that God and His creation are all one, realize that by living your life on that principle even as you have to act as a person distict from others. Difficult. But I try this path hoping that one day God will ensure successful transition to Oneness. Basudeb Sen ---------------------------- Dear Sadhak Community There is a nice response from Mike Keenor, nice in the sense there is outpouring positivism. I approached Gita in many ways - scientific, athiestic and spiritual. From all the angles I see there is immense wisdom stored in Gita. Ever since I have been studying Gita, specially the last 2 years, I am amazed at the down to earth messages. So I remain on earth and talk about the practical messages clearly indicated, they are neither hidden nor hinted, in Gita. Being a science student and in engineering profession, I always question things / dictum before my mind sees the rationale behind them - be it Vedas / Gita or otherwise. There are many slokas in Gita that showers the life management principles even if I study them as an athiest - ignore the fruits of desires (twaktaphalam), live in the 9-holed town (navadwarava pure dehi). Only to say 'critical examination of any scripture' is utmost necessary, I quote from Gita ( 2:42, 2:43, 2:44 ) which suggested not get trapped by the 'karma kanda' /'swargabhoga' (the rituals and the pleasures of the heaven) in the early part of Vedas. That is being rational about the objective of Gita. Despite my strong faith and belief in Gita, I do not trust in rebirth, saying that 'people suffer from the karma of previous births', 'concept of sin / virtue' as account maintained by God or some power. No! I do not!! There can be many interpretations to those words / usages in Gita. Remember that though Gita was documented in 2nd century AD, the slokas were known even before 1500 BC. We are 3500 years from the source and its meaning. Mike - I like your positivism, but Gita is also suggesting 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - meaning there is controllable part the sadhak has to do (not waiting for God's hand), wherever he cannot, he should seek help from others (remember God lives in all). For all this sport of activities, the energy comes from the positivism / belief / imagination /critical thinking /relating the messages to the practical difficulties of life. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram The KARMA issue will be addressed as a separate topic. Kindly stay with one topic and subject at hand. Gita Talk Moderators, Ram Ram ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear Venu Komanduri, B.G. 4 In whatever way they resort To Me do I thus reward them. It is My path which ev'rywhere All men follow, O Arjuna. (11). People the world over from many different faiths, or even non faiths, who started their journey so very long ago, who hear as it were the ringing of the sacred bells, and have a yearning in their hearts for the unknown Beloved, they feel that Love, they know it is there. Do you not think that Divine Krishna would not take his children by the hand and show them the way home, 'The last miles'. It is by means of their actions by their morality and there love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. Do you think HE would not bring his children together so they may find comfort, be supported and support others in Divine Forum. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ----------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Wonderful dear Venu. In other words, you are telling us all to shut up! Yes that is very much required for any serious seeker. You are very right … no scripture recommends tattva-vada. Definitely, tattva-vada can be a potential plague … most often, it is better to be ignorant rather than being a tattava-vadin: Andhantamah pravishanti ye avidyaamupaasate | Tato bhuya iva te tamo ye u vidyaayaam rataah || But, … is there any other way toward becoming a tattva-darshin? Manasaivedamaaptavyam neha naanaasti kinchana || We have to retrace the same path in which we collected our garbage (ignorance and inertia) to remove the same – our minds and bodies. You know, the vaccine is in the very germ! We have to turn the same germ against itself to releive ourselves from our deseases. We are helpless but to indulge in this vada (fight with our own bodily and mental demands) to remove the ignorance and inertia harbored within. The darshana (attainment of peace) is an eventuality of the vada (the war within). No war … no peace! No war within is a suicide in other words … Tangste pretyaabhigacchhanti ye kechaatmahano janaah || One who persihes without fighting the ignorance and inertia harbored within is the worst of all suicides. Therefore, a true vada (a truthful fight against one's own ignorance and inertia - you may want to call the vaccine, Tattva Vimarsha) is very essential to attain The Peace (Tattva Darshana) … after all a war is a war … things can go wrong … but it is definitely better than a suicide … definitely better than being consumed by our own tendencies as time passes over rendering no resistance like a pashu … Off course, the vada has the most vicious side effect that it itself can become the biggest vasana … well, as far as one is cognizant of the vada and its vicuous side effects, it is good and … that is the only way. The clouds of our ignorance and inertia become thinner and thinner as our truthfulness in our Tattva Vada intensifies in our internal search for the truth (Vada should be pitched against one's own well- established stupidity NOT ON THE STUPIDITY WISHFULLY PERCEIVED IN OTHERS!). Clarity of the truth (Tattva darshana) naturally increases as the clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner and thinner … it is an eventuality that we look forward to so that we can finally perform your wonderful suggestion – SHUT UP! Till then … let us poor things perform the ritual waging the war within. Once in a while, please keep peeping in to remind us that we really wage it only for the correct reason (to burn the ignorance within) and only on the correct targets (to uproot the inertia within). That is helpful. THANK YOU. Respects. Naga Narayana ------------------------------- Dear sadaks, Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' This is what Bagavan said to Arjuna. Bagavan said, " What is use of knowing all knowledge when I (bagavan) is right in front of you " . Means do not worry of Sadanas, Karmas, Scripts, knowledge on Sat etc when the SAT (bagavan) has comes. That is surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan who will take care of all the good what knowledge could give and also eradicate all vasanas, Karmas by HIS sankalpa itself. We have been trying over several births and still landing here. But if Bagavan tries you, the there is no any obstacle to liberate. But if Bagavan wants to try one, then he must have Niskama Prema Bakthi, which Bagavan has said in Geetha. Jai Sri Krishna baiya sathyanarayan =========================================== Happy new year 2009 to all sadhaks Thanks for your co-operation and guide regarding Gita 2.16 pawan singhal -------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The Q of Venuji had two facets. One re the object of this Satsanga Forum. While I am not in any way a Founder of this Forum but as I see there is a common thread binding all Sadhaks - Swamiji Shri Ramsukhdasji Maharaj and Holy Gita. The sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal- beyond all faiths and religions- covering humanity at large. This forum is in my view at present " evolving " and the deliberations are getting divine and divine. We , in fact, can easily state that we are part of a Jnana Yagya within the meaning of Holy Gita. Hence I don't see any limitations on the scope of this forum. Since Holy Gita encompasses entire humanity , both principles and practice of ideal human conduct - I see nothing wrong in our addressing any type of problems faced by Sadhaks in their spiritual journey. All my personal views as one of the many Sadhaks of this divine group. Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Dear all , Yes , if we can implement the teachings of gita , in our day to day living , not only will it make life Less stressful , but more meaningful . After all we live in our communities and mingle / work / interact, so i Feel as long as we understand The true meaning (spirit of the message ) of the message sought to be Conveyed by the gita and try & Impact the same in our lives , things will be much better . In short ,what we want to be is better human beings , because only than can we be better Parents / children / friends / spouses /sadhaks / teachers/ Rgds Arvind Malhotra ---------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The very existence is " SAT " . Those who have experienced the characteristics of " SAT " and ever changing function of nature- " ASAT " , they in practice experience " their obvious , self proven, natural, automatic positioning in the existence viz SAT . In their experience there is nothing known as ASAT existing. In other words in their experience only SAT is existing- nothing else is existing. Such great people are called " tattva darshibhih " . In their experience only their positioning in SAT- imperishable, permanent, ever present existence- remains. Through that positioning they get highest rewards. In BG 2:16- the term " ubhayorapi " - represents " conscience " ! " Antah " - represents " element knowledge " !! " Drishtah " - represents " experience " !!! Meaning thereby that " conscience has transformed ( " transition " term as used by the questioner) in to the experiential knowledge and now what has remained is SAT - existence only! This is the highest state of Jnana Yoga!! The Highest reward! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16). Swamiji has been very clear about this... " Real " (Sat) is our natural state. Natural is what needs no effort. It is ever attained. It simply IS. Be situate in it. The essence (Real) is always there - will always be there. The real is not created. The unreal is created from the Real, stays in the real and then merges in the real. It has no existence of its own. One has to simply give importance to ones own experience. No need to believe in the scriptures. Your existence always IS. What is NOT can never exist. The IS always remains IS. To experience 'I AM', no effort is required. No practice. There is no doubt of our existence. The real essence is our existence. The base, the foundation of all appearance - of all creation. That is Paramatma (Supreme Consciousness,God). Meera Das Ram Ram ---------------------------- This is the sanest stuff I heard in a while! Hare Krishna! Gurunath Prakash ---------------------------- GITA TALK GROUP GUIDELINES: 1. Purpose of the group is to help Sadhakas clarify their doubts related to Gitaji shalokas. Therefore, responses which further clarify the understanding of Gitaji, will only be posted. 2. Wherever possible, please quote Gitaji or other scriptures to substantiate your response. 3. Kindly limit personal feelings, opinions, beliefs etc. to the extent that they further help in understanding the Gita shlokas 4. Please be as concise and to the point as possible, respecting sadhaka's time. 5. Kindly focus your writing to the subject at hand only. 6. Please do not include links to the other sites or other organizations. 7. Kindly do not include your personal information such as phone number, address etc. 8. Please do not address the response to a particular individual since the message is going to the entire group. 9. Due to the large readership, all responses may not be posted. 10. Moderator at his discretion, may modify the posting, if content is unclear or not appropriate for distribution to the group. 11. Please respond taking into consideration the novices, youth, westerners, non-sectarian audience. Kindly limit the use to Sanskrit words only, rather provide the English word with Sanskrit bracketed wherever possible. MODERATOR Ram Ram ------------------------ Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2009 Report Share Posted February 7, 2009 Dear Sadhak Community (1) Is the purpose of this forum only to discuss the meaning behind Gita slokas? and / or (2) interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life? (By practical life, I mean one living the normal life while in the quest for God, Gita does not shun the karma, but the attachment towards it) While I understand both are important, Gita is directing its readers like us to grow from Tatwa vaadibhi (one who reads and discusses about the essential element) to tatva darsibhi (one who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat'). I am particularly and practically interested in this transition, because some of the comments from my fellow sadhaks like 'then the soul leaves the body','everything has nothing, while nothing has every thing' while the same people are also suggesting 'no one may have seen God' 'Tatvadarsibhi' (who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat') is referred in Gita 2:16 of Sankhya Yoga. Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' here. Let me know your views on the transition. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- FOLLOW-UP Gita also says - 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - not waiting for God's hand. ---------------------------- NEW POSTING thought this may be of value dinesh Become givers, not takers: Spiritualists Patel, Dinesh -------------------------------- Hari Om I often used to wonder as to why Swamiji wrote a separate article in many books on " Yogah Karmashu Kaushalam " stated in BG 2:50. Then I thought that it is to establish importance of " Equanimity " in practical life. But when I read interpretation of Mr Venu along with his theory of sins and concept of no re-birth , it occurred to me how great 'visionary' (of trends in Kaliyuga) was Swamiji Ramsukhdasji Maharaj. No Mr Venu ! It does not mean - " Cleverness in doing karmas is Yoga " . It means - In doing karma equanimity(yoga) is skill ! Here the term " kaushalam " ( cleverness/skill) is an adjective/respect/ glory (mahimaa) of " equanimity " not of karmas. Chaos in the world will emerge if the interpretation taken by you is held valid. What to say when it is with your theory of incurring sin and no rebirth ! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Jai Hanuman Mr Venu ! Replies to some of your observations, please kindly keep an open mind. These are not criticisms. We are all only sadhaks. You said that Gita is neither directly nor indirectly suggesting us to switch off our brains. Reply is that in fact Gita is both directly and indirectly suggesting us to switch off our brains !! Post a separate Q on this. We shall tell you as to how, Jee ! Belief can be very powerful and must not be underestimated. Can you prove your parents " other than by just belief " ? You don't remember your birth- no body does ! Now how a human being can prove as to who is his father without " believing " based on " personal knowledge " ? No way- I repeat no way !! Be sure, you will not be able to do that - because births/rebirths are always and exclusively subject matter of " belief " only, never never of " acquired knowledge " - PURE MINDLESS BELIEF !! Come on, Jee ! Argue !! Else " accept " !!! On one hand we can't prove this life birth without belief and you are talking about eternal father and eternal scriptures of Sanatan Dharma ?? Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala ---------------------------- Radhey Radhey The interpretation by Mr Venu of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " reminds me of what is stated in BG 18:32. It squarely opposite of what is reality and highly dangerous. " skilled karmas " are not " yoga " - as Mr Venu right from his first message to the last repeating, repeating and repeating. It can not be so. If this view is held true, then a thief who does theft skillfully will be declared to be a YOGI !! This interpretation along with his novel and unique theory of " change in mental metabolism " causing the sins, and mindless insistence upon theory of no re birth etc - may put him on a wrong path- spiritually. The best thing which has happened therefore for him, by Divine Will, is that he has come in touch with this divine, self less, real satsanga site ! He should thank his " prior karmas " for the same and rather than trying to teach should equip himself " mentally " to learn. Swamiji has written an entire chapter on the subject of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " . Here the skilled word has been used to GLORIFY the yoga. It means - Yoga is the skill in karmas. Your karmas become non binding only when YOGA is in them. YOGA means EQUANIMITY. Hence practice of equanimity in doing karma is skill. Nisha Chatterji -------------------- Jai Hanuman So you say, not only say, insist so frequently that " clevery executed karma " is Yoga under Gita 2:50 ! Sins get incurred only when the expectations are not met as some chemical reaction takes place in the brain and that " cleverness " of the execution of karmas is vitiated ! There is no rebirth, therefore no worry for future ! You think that some body does " ghor karma " (evil deed) very cleverly and succeeds in that, then he does not incur any sins? Now think !! Rethink ! Please read Swamiji's messages on Karma Yog / past Gita Talk messages and kindly get back to us with your findings! What Mike Bhaiyya ! It is so simple to be " Yogi " Jee !! Yogi under Holy Gita, Brother ! Dhanya Ho !! Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala ---------------------- Shri Hari The theory advanced by Venuji about incurring of sins, caused by change in mental chemistry is surprising. Almost each of his concepts need a thorough re-orientation. Good that he has reached here somehow. Let this soul get direction. Shyama Chhangani ------------------------ Mr Venu ! It is my feeling that the observations, the logic, the theories advanced in your note have not been influenced by sadhak messages in this forum, such as the discussion on " Vasudeva Sarvam " " Divine is everywhere " . Let us all be open to listening to new ideas and being brief in our own usage of words and experience the divinity in this forum! Regards Khan Jarsingh ------------------------------- My Salutations to all in this forum Interesting, really very very intersting !Will experienced and learned sadhaks clarify in detail as to whether the theories so painstakingly advanced by Mr Venu K. are correct ? I have not so far during my 6/7 month association with this forum come across concepts as such. I am more interested in his theory regarding sins and his interpretation that nicely/skillfully/cleverly executed actions make a person " yogi " under Gita. If that is so, then I think it is very simple to be " yogi " and a lot of humanity gets covered by this definition. Does Gita confirm that when expectations are not met, there are changes in the brain chemistry? Well, yes, it is difficult to establish re birth. I am eagerly looking forward to deliberations. Please also explain what is this " vaadibhi " and " darshibhi " and Gitacharya stated by Mr Venu ? Thanks Luca B --------------------------- Dear Sadhaks > > Amazing and novel theories put forward nu so laboriously 1. Theory of Rebirth 2. Theory reg Poulation increase 3 Yoga under Gita 4. Practicing vis a vis talking about Gita - need for practical living of Gita 5. Theory reg change in brain to initiate sinful conduct 6.. Mind vs Belief . Mike Keenor please clarify your response as it appeared somewhat vague. Thanks, Audrey Rodrigues ------------------------- PRIOR POSTING -Shree Hari- Dear Venu Komanduri, Firstly I will reiterate what I first quoted: Yoga Aphorism Concentration II 39 : When he is fixed in non-receiving he gets the memory of past life. Swami Vivekananda made no bones about, it he said the memory of past life is the first power a yogi obtains. Now you can say all of this is lunacy, that really is fine by me. Lord Krishna told Arjuna about the reality of rebirth/past life. Chapter 2 Even as a man casts off his worn-out clothes And then clothes himself in others which are new So the embodied casts off worn-out bodies And then enters into others which are new. (22) Of that which is born, death is sure, Of that which is dead, birth is sure. Over the unavoidable, Therefore you never should lament. (27) Chapter 4 The Holy Lord said: Many the births that I have passed– Many passed by you, Arjuna. I have full knowledge of them all, While you do not, Scorcher of Foes. (5) Many more examples, I am not sure how one rationalizes this to mean something else. Actually I will tell you something, if you apply fierce logic in your quest, not backing away from your task to be at one with the universal truth, then all your questions will melt away, but hold onto your hat! 'It is by means of their actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives.' With all due respect your water bottle analogy is like comparing, sardines to bananas. Looking at the logic of the water analogy no mater what form or where those molecules go, they remain those molecules. Now the eternal self is not mega water molecules, but the individual eternal soul, that may become part of the whole plain of oneness but remains like a water molecule that one individual, just like the one water molecule now in the ocean is existent for all of existence. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike (Keenor). --------------------------- Dear sadaks, Sri Venu Komandurisays-- Bagavan suggests tattva darsibhi is better and there is NO appeal. !08 upanashids mentions here and there that it (Upanashids) unable to describe GOD. They why strain on tattva vadibhi. By sticking and practicing SAT? Means deataching to objects and emotions, strongly knowing in mind the dear and near can collapse any time, one came alone and goes alone, all things on earth is only visible by Maya, amount of input of attachment is sorrow of same amount later, Maanusha degam Dullabam, just pretend that one is affectionate, attached, caring and perform actions (karmas) only at body level, always in Anniyachitha of Bagavan. Talking about SAT one has abosolutely NO knowledge how IT is. Can just say what imagined or very little known. One does not see Air but can feel. God is very clearly said HE is Apprameyam. Means no pramanam, not object, cannot be seen or felt by any human senses. Then HIS sankalpa to take a form and show us HIS vision. In Srimat Bagavat it is very clear about GOD told by Elephant Gajendra- HE is AKKILA KARANAM, ARPUTHA KARANAM, NISH KARANAM. May be it contradictory but has wonderful message that is said in Bagavath Geetha Transition- Like birds migrating from one place to other. Like changing cloths. In Saffire dress or Pyjama, or suit you are the same person. When Jeva leaves it takes with it it`s own Karmas, Vasanas, Dana & Dharm, Paapa & Puniya etc that was experienced on earth and NOTHING materialistically from earth. In case Jeeva leaves without anything said above, it travels on Archanathi Marg northern side of earth and reaches Paramathuma. Jai Sri Krishna B.Sathyanarayan ----------------------- Venuji, please clarify your perspective. In my eyes there appear to be vaccilation between belief and mind. Thakurlingam ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear sadaks, Once soul leaves the body, it takes nothing of worldly things is the meaning. A crorepathi on death can never carry with him anything, even his body except his own cause and effects (Karmas). Of course many has seen GOD in the past. But we never believed them. We insulted them as " Chitta Brama " . We never knew their Chitta was with Brama. Mother Andal in SriRangam has seen God. Thrirupan Alwar, Nandanar, Kannaper, Samartha Ramadoss, Bradrachalla Ramadoss, Shridi Sai Baba, Ramana Rishi, Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa showed God to Vivekanath. Paramathuma is NOT object has been discussed so many times. HE is to be known through Gyana/Bakthi. In Srimath Bagavath it is said that Bakthi Maatha unable to wake up her 2 children Gyana and Virag as Kali was Born. For a person with poorna faith, he can see God in many. For a person with distrubed & uncertain faith, even if God appears he will start thinking whether it is illusion, just like Duryodan saw Viswaroop. For Valmiki with years of Ram Naam Ant hill covering him, never lost faith. Fraction of faith lost, will show no any results. Though in Bible, the example is nice. Christ was walking on water. A disciple also wanted to walk on water. Christ said come. He walked on water. But as he was waliking on water, a doubt came in his mind , " What if I sink " . He sank. Christ said to disciple, " When you lost faith- faithlessness sank you " . Sri Ragavendar Swamy in his teen age gave food to Sri Krishna Idol which never ate. He profusly cried to extent of fainting, Sri Krishna came and ate. So was in case of Namadev. Mother Yasoda said today I will tie up Krishna. She tried with a rope and it was getting short of 2 Inches. When she surrendered to Sri Krishna saying with love,' Oh Krishna I cannot tie you. Bagavan gave HIS hip to be tied. Bakthi (physical surrender), intellect (Mind surrender), faith (Budhi Surrender) known as Trikarna Sudhi, Bagavan appears in the form you desire. Purpose of this forum is to impart Gyana so that one can see God. Guru (this forum) shows the way, it is up to one to catch up fast with faith. Have faith on a stone, Bagavan appears. Jai Sri Krishna --------------------------- Dear Sadhakom There is a hot response for my posting. Thank you all for giving me an opportunity to explain what I said and try to answer your questions. Before that I want to mention 3 of points here: (a) We all who participated in this posting believe in God, I believe we differ in how we perceive God. I do not see and do not expect you would see this as an anomaly as we are all seeking the same target in different paths (types of yoga). (b) All sadhaks may not be at the same level of sadhana and making spiritual progress at same speed. I may be at basic level and you may be at advanced stages. There is no measure to it. © Please show tolerance / constraint to different view points – when you have 6 billion people, they all could be different. Being in the advanced stages, a sadhak will show more constraint towards others (I do not need to read or quote from Gita for this simple fundamental on human relations) Since our moderator advised brevity, I will try to follow the same, but cannot be sure of the same: I studied Gita (mainly the first 7 chapters repeatedly and others once) and was relating many of the down-to-earth messages of Gitacharya to my own personal life to remove tensions, developing relationship with my fellow citizens around and writing my own observations in a dairy. When I joined this forum, the topics postings suggested to me the sadhaks are in advanced stage of saadhana. As I went through the communication, I was not clear on some statements from the sadhaks connected with postings like `samaadhi / moksha', expressions like `soul leaving body' if they have visualized these states and responding. If I were you I would not venture to answer the posting like on samaadhi vs moksha, without experiencing both the states. So my posting was to get some clarity on the practice / examples own experiences. Mike – I understood your writing then and now the same way, no disagreement with you on it. I only brought an additional point, in support of viewing Gita from different angles. Gita is neither directly nor indirectly suggesting us to switch off our brains. Use our skills and intellect, question our way up so we may progress and make the progress in a best way – is what I meant by `yogah karmasu kousalam', is also stated in Gita again as `muktasanjna karma samaacharh'. On rebirth, let me know how the following contradicts Gita? God is of many forms. For simplicity of understanding, let us say divine (purusha or Lord) form and non-divine form (prakriti – Nature). If I consider divine form as a divine ocean (water), man takes birth as the water enters into a bottle. Water + bottle(B) = man. There could be different men B1, B2, B3 etc.We identify the characteristics of the bottle (the color, the shape) to water also, so we see different men (with different colors and shapes). When death arrives, bottle breaks and water gets back to the ocean. After death, there is no B1, B2 and B3, right? It is all gone back to divine form (to God). In ocean you do cannot trace the water thrown back. There will be births from the ocean, but nothing cannot be called `rebirth'. Sorry I cannot prove it, no way different from that you cannot prove rebirths – other than believing our scriptures. Its 50: 50 chance, right? But see this: If rebirths are to be accepted as the fact (other than just belief), there has be to be 1:1. (I am taking India as an example here) How come the population exploded from 350 million to about 1000 million in about last 35 years and not before? Are we to assume that more living beings are transmuting to human beings now? I am not suggesting the above is truth, but a view point. I am open to criticism here, but be logical in what you say. Man has to pay for his own karma in this birth itself that is very much evident. If I negligently drive the car, I am sure to make accidents. Gita warns us to be more responsible and be skillful in our actions or karma. Again like I said I am focusing on Gita messages which are down-to-earth, I am not there yet where I have experienced God in every human being and treated them the same way, no I am not there yet. Vyasji At the times Gita was documented, our ancestors do not have as much writing / editing tools that have today. They have documented what has been practiced by many for 100s of years before in a very brief manner. That is the reason there are so many written commentaries about same one Gita from different great people later and there could be other reasons also. Different perspectives!! God has given man intellect and an area of independence. Within that area man has the control and beyond it others, society, nature and God. We need to use that to the fullest extent before seeking help from God. This is not `egoism', this is use of the God-gifted assets. Use intellect and do karmas skillfully, but do not desire the fruits. Desire for fruits causes expectations, microscopic changes in brain. These changes are waiting forces (papas or sins) which will spring up, when the expectations are not met, causing uncontrollable emotions for men. Is that not a rational? Is that not what our modern psychology saying? 1000s of years after Gita said the truth!! The more I see the rationality behind Gita messages, the more my admiration grows to Gitacharya. Your question on rebirth, hut and palace, difference between children of same parents. Hut and palace – how is this connected with a rebirth? If parents are wealthy, children are born in palace. By your statement, you believe that who are born in huts have done (sins), in palace have done virtues (Punya). Do not you see that is just chance but not karma? If so, how come Gandhi is not born in a hut chooses to live in huts to be close to common man? Obama, born of a poorman, now is US president. Gandhi is great because he made great karmas, not because he was born great!! Accidents – since you believe in karma, you asked such question. Did you every try blindly running across a heavy traffic of cars? You would not and I would not, because we know it is not safe, nothing to do with past life karma. Same thing with accidents. To answer your questions, when accidents happened more people died when they did not wear safety helmets / safety belts. If your statement has to be true, we do not need courts to punish criminals, because every task is governed by past life karma. Sorry about it!! Difference in children of the same parents - it is all due to DNA – genetic. If you are interested and want to be rational, you can search internet on `DNA', you will get tons of information. I did not understand your question on Krishna, sorry so I cannot answer the same. Critical examination – this word may have pained you and may be others also, I apologize if it did. That's what happens when our beliefs are hurt. I went through this painful experience when I read `Indian Philosophy' by former Indian President S.Radhakrishnan, which talks about how the 6 systems of Indian philosophy have originated, scriptures – Vedas, Upanishads and epics were (and what times) compiled. My beliefs to perceive God in human form (like Vishnu, Shiva etc) was deeply hurt. However, I had go through that pain and overcome that to now have broader belief system. Please do not be under the impression that `critical examination' is going aginst a system or philosophy. Its mindset to probe and ask questions to gather more information about whatever you do /read or study. I am not saying `right' information. Certain things do not sound logical and need deep understanding / reading of other books. Lot of people will be surprised to know that Indian geometry (mathematics) originated from or for `aagama' shastra. (To know more about it type `sulabha sutras' in Google). And now we know that sciences originated and proliferated into many branches from mathematics. So when I read Gita or other puranas, I cannot switch of my rationale if there are some questions around it. I do not think our ancestors expected that too. If so, I am wondering if so many commentaries on Gita or other scriptures are necessary. Shasaikalaji You talked about `luck' and it depends on how define `luck'. Take a minute and try to define the word `luck' or see a dictionary. We use this word in general, whether we believe in it or not, even I use it and I do not believe in it. There is positive way of having `luck' and conventional way of using it. If some one gets lottery or promotion or money, we say `he is lucky'. Is that what you mean? I consider I am lucky when I read a nice poem in `bhagavatam' that God gave me a mind to enjoy to my fullest extent. Can a billionaire enjoy that poem as much as I do if God has not given him that mind (bank balance does not change it). He can buy a top model car/ building, not the mind. He has to use his own, good or bad. Holy Gita, Ramayana or Bharata – God never said follow everything blindly. When it occurs to your brain, even if it is Vedas, Upanishads, please do have question on that, but most obediently, so the beliefs are not hurt. Your questions enrich your belief, like I explained in my note to Vyasji. Energy comes to us when we are open to criticism and same way we lose energy when we react negatively to a criticism. We are human beings with emotions. So being a science student is not that I am a scientist or any big person, the tendency to be inquisitive. Mind and belief – Can you define `mind' for me? Its is difficult, of course, our dictionaries provide definition, you can say it a `collection of thoughts, feelings and emotions'. Your beliefs come out of your `mind' and are an intense emotion. Belief is one you think is right (whether that is right or wrong for society or others). You may derive the knowledge your belief from books, parents, society and they are likely to change naturally or by force. I believe that `Vaada' is very important aspect of learning and being open about `vaada' is equally important too, I would encourage you to read the chronology of Indian scriptures, so we will have a better perspective of how much our ancestors struggled to store their wisdom for us, how they transmitted the same through generations. Sorry I took lot of your time/space, Moderatorji!!! Venu Komanduri SUMMARY OF SADHAK RESPONSES Ram Ram - No scripture recommends only tattva-vada (reading/discussing only) - Interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! - Sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal. It addresses principles and practice of ideal human conduct. All issues can be addressed. - As clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner, clarity increases - " tattva darshibhih " remain only SAT (Existence) - " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16) - Sadhak is to be tattva darsibhi (by living/practicing 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). - It is no about simply waiting for God to do. - It is by means of sadhak's actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. - The great souls, these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. - Surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan and all vasanas will be eradicated - Bhagwan will reveal himself to his children and bring his children together in the way they resort to Him. - Have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for yourr life (lessons from other pilgrims) - Implementing Gita teachings - KEY to betterment - Practices Gita in one's life probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion - Yes! one has to " live " Gita principles. There is no doubt, No contradiction. - Without cause-effect (rebirth), what causes such inequanimity in births, situations, circumstances etc.? - Critical Examination of Gita/God, is it possible? - Paramatma is not easily conquerable by our critical thinking etc. - Aren't Mind / Belief opposite / separate subjects altogether? - No need to believe in theories, believe your own experience - God and His creation are all one - WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life. KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFEBELT - GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. - THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth. Ram Ram ---------------------------- NEW POSTING -Shree Hari- Dear Venu Komanduri, Thanks for your comments on my post. I like to mention to you at first, that I have spent my whole life in the field of electronics, logic was one of my favorite subjects. There came a time in my life when logic, and common sense were confounded. (You will have to take my word on that, there will be hundreds of sadhaks who will understand what I am saying). Actually I was putting the opposite spin on the common view, that is practicing intuitively, maybe from the inner conscience a way of life, searching all avenues for answer to the paradoxes of existence. One must remember, there are many great souls in the world who have never heard of the Bhagavad Gita, and when they come across it they are amazed. Analize carefully what I wrote: 'It is by means of their actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives.' I really do not think I implied one should await for GOD, if it appeared that way I apologize. B.G. 11: Prostrating in adoration, do I crave Forgiveness: as a father forgives his son, A friend his dear friend, and a lover his love†" Thus even so should You forgive Me, O God. (44 Overjoyed am I, seeing Your form, and yet My mind is distracted with terror. Show me, In mercy Lord, only Your previous form†" O Lord of gods, Abode of the universe. (45 Purely out of interest what do you make of that from a logical approach. You ask about transition, it can come slowly a gently path, or fierce and fast, like fire. But whatever, " You keep chopping wood, and fetching water " . B.G. 2: Attached to pleasure and power Their minds are drawn away by this Speech, and to them is not granted The insight from meditation. (44) The introspective ones I talk of, ponder meditate, these 'Pilgrims', prefer a quiet life, you know scientists, technocrats, woodchoppers, whatever, but they do not seek glory. To quote you: 'I do not trust in rebirth, saying that 'people suffer from the karma of previous births' Talking of Yogis, or Yogis to be: Yoga Aphorism: Concentration II: (39). When he is fixed in none receiving, he gets the memory of past life. B.G. 18 And even that man who hears this, Full of faith and free from scoffing, He, liberated, shall attain The happy worlds of the righteous. (71) Has this been heard, O Pritha’s son, By you with a one-pointed mind? Moreover, has the delusion Of your ignorance been destroyed? (72) Arjuna said: Yea, destroyed is my delusion, And I have gained my memory Through Your grace, and my doubts are gone. I am firm; I will do Your word. (73) I hope my friend I have answers some of your questions, I can only tell you the truth as I see it. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ---------------------------- Hari Om Dear Mr Venu It is great to note that your kind self respects Gita except some portions of it. I have few questions. Kindly oblige by replying to the same. Please use your rational/logical mind and sharp intellect while responding so that we may reap maximum benefits. What is that " cleverness " which you referred while giving your version of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " ? Since you don't believe in rebirth, hence by your logical and rational sharp mind/intellect/ego please enlighten us as to how one child gets born in a hut and another in a palace? Is it pure coincidence or there are some laws behind the same? Why one should abstain from evil conduct? Why not, at least when one is sure of death, one should reap maximum pleasure from the world , by whatever means, as there will no rebirth to pay for_ Since there are no sins/virtues accumulating? What/Who leaves a live body so as to make it a corpse? How come 2 children of same parents have differences, inspite of living in same environment? How come in an accident one survives while another does not? Your more learned views are also solicited on that " karma kanda/swarga bhog " verses of Gitaji referred by you. What according to you may be the reasons of Lord Krishna advising us not to fall prey to the enticement of Karma Kand of Vedas? You said Sir that Krishna lives in all beings. Can you enlighten us as to why and for what time and since when? " Critical examination of Gita " - what according to you makes that necessary? Who is qualified to conduct that examination? What should be the basis of such exercise? How it should be conducted- any yardsticks in your logical/rationale mind ? Your elaborate views are solicited for benefit of us all. Most of the Sadhaks in this forum , including me, have more belief than logic/rationale. Your association and contribution therefore should enrich us. May be in the end you also walk out richer too. I trust you will respond " positively " . Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Jai Hanuman Venuji Maharaj ! I noted your kind advice to our Brother Mike Keenor . I quote below the last para - Kindly elaborate as to what is this " belief " ? Being a science student yourself and luckily ( " luckily " -since you don't believe in rebirth etc-or you don't believe in " luck " also ?) you also have mind and sharp intellect. Naturally , therefore, you critically evaluate everything before any acceptance- even if that is Holy Gita. Then what is this animal called " belief " which you referred in your elaborate advice to Mike Bhaiyya? Where then, Jee, is space for " belief " in your critical/sharp/logical/rational/thinking/evaluating/analytical/energe tic as well as energy producing/imaginative mind and intellect? Are not mind and belief two different and opposite subjects altogether? Like North Pole and South Pole? Bolo Jee! Boliye Sir !! Waiting for a positive response, Jee. Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram What " rationale " what " critical exam " We think, God is that easily conquerable by us? by our rationale and critical examination? Until one realizes the a speck on nothingness that we are compared to God ...then and then only true knowledge will reveal itself (rather we will allow it to flow into us) . We are like that upside down bowl, when it is raining. Swamiji has given this example... that the rain is pouring equallly on all. What can God do if we chose to keep our bowl, upside down? He is equally accessible to all. No one is forcing one to believe. Let us believe in our own experience. All our lives we have been learning only from " cause and effect " no other reason. We avoid fire, because sometime or the other we felt the heat and knew it to be dangerous. We learn from our mistakes, because there is a consequence. There is a price to be paid. We don't need to believe in theories as Swamiji says, just believe in our own experiences(anubhav). Ram Ram ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om. Hinduism never never compels one to read Gita at any point of one's life. There may be crores of hindus pass by their birth without even looking at HOLY GITA. Krushna has never uttered a word that everyone should surely read GIta. Krushna has given us Gita not to just read it and please HIM!!!!!!! He has taken pity on each and everyone of us!!!! We really dont understand the birth cycle at all !!!!! TO Krushna is attached the Vishnu Maya and Krushna is OMNI PRESENT in PRACRUTHI (Nature) !!!! WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life !!!! We keep facing cyclone after cyclone and we get lost in this action of pracruthi (Nature) !!!! Some start losing faith in God as they are shaken as disaster after disaster ruin their life !!!! This continues till we surrender to Krushna and take Gita in our hand. Here comes a great change in our life as KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFE BELT ---GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. He explains in detail the dimensions of nature-pracruthi, what our body is made of, what our mind does, what our intellect does, what is SATH CHITH. He has taken great care to educate us on Sthira Bhuddhi, Ignorance and true knowledge. THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth !!!!! So interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! With regards, Usha Sridhar. ---------------------------- Hari Om Dear Sadhak Venu ! What is your question? I wonder if any sadhak contradicted what you mean to say ! Yes- one has to " live " Gita principles. How and where there is doubt on the same? Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B ---------------------------- Re:Tatwa vaadibhi to tatva darsibhi Venu Komanduri is absolutely right: the ultimate aim is tatva darsibhi, though tatva darsibhi may be the initial step towards that. If an individual gets too attached to discussions and interpretation on Gita, the focus on practice to become tatva darsibhi may be lost. And, when one practices Gita in one's life it is probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion on Gita. I am sure God will help and direct you along the path. If you have learnt that God and His creation are all one, realize that by living your life on that principle even as you have to act as a person distict from others. Difficult. But I try this path hoping that one day God will ensure successful transition to Oneness. Basudeb Sen ---------------------------- Dear Sadhak Community There is a nice response from Mike Keenor, nice in the sense there is outpouring positivism. I approached Gita in many ways - scientific, athiestic and spiritual. From all the angles I see there is immense wisdom stored in Gita. Ever since I have been studying Gita, specially the last 2 years, I am amazed at the down to earth messages. So I remain on earth and talk about the practical messages clearly indicated, they are neither hidden nor hinted, in Gita. Being a science student and in engineering profession, I always question things / dictum before my mind sees the rationale behind them - be it Vedas / Gita or otherwise. There are many slokas in Gita that showers the life management principles even if I study them as an athiest - ignore the fruits of desires (twaktaphalam), live in the 9-holed town (navadwarava pure dehi). Only to say 'critical examination of any scripture' is utmost necessary, I quote from Gita ( 2:42, 2:43, 2:44 ) which suggested not get trapped by the 'karma kanda' /'swargabhoga' (the rituals and the pleasures of the heaven) in the early part of Vedas. That is being rational about the objective of Gita. Despite my strong faith and belief in Gita, I do not trust in rebirth, saying that 'people suffer from the karma of previous births', 'concept of sin / virtue' as account maintained by God or some power. No! I do not!! There can be many interpretations to those words / usages in Gita. Remember that though Gita was documented in 2nd century AD, the slokas were known even before 1500 BC. We are 3500 years from the source and its meaning. Mike - I like your positivism, but Gita is also suggesting 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - meaning there is controllable part the sadhak has to do (not waiting for God's hand), wherever he cannot, he should seek help from others (remember God lives in all). For all this sport of activities, the energy comes from the positivism / belief / imagination /critical thinking /relating the messages to the practical difficulties of life. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram The KARMA issue will be addressed as a separate topic. Kindly stay with one topic and subject at hand. Gita Talk Moderators, Ram Ram ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear Venu Komanduri, B.G. 4 In whatever way they resort To Me do I thus reward them. It is My path which ev'rywhere All men follow, O Arjuna. (11). People the world over from many different faiths, or even non faiths, who started their journey so very long ago, who hear as it were the ringing of the sacred bells, and have a yearning in their hearts for the unknown Beloved, they feel that Love, they know it is there. Do you not think that Divine Krishna would not take his children by the hand and show them the way home, 'The last miles'. It is by means of their actions by their morality and there love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. Do you think HE would not bring his children together so they may find comfort, be supported and support others in Divine Forum. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ----------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Wonderful dear Venu. In other words, you are telling us all to shut up! Yes that is very much required for any serious seeker. You are very right … no scripture recommends tattva-vada. Definitely, tattva-vada can be a potential plague … most often, it is better to be ignorant rather than being a tattava-vadin: Andhantamah pravishanti ye avidyaamupaasate | Tato bhuya iva te tamo ye u vidyaayaam rataah || But, … is there any other way toward becoming a tattva-darshin? Manasaivedamaaptavyam neha naanaasti kinchana || We have to retrace the same path in which we collected our garbage (ignorance and inertia) to remove the same – our minds and bodies. You know, the vaccine is in the very germ! We have to turn the same germ against itself to releive ourselves from our deseases. We are helpless but to indulge in this vada (fight with our own bodily and mental demands) to remove the ignorance and inertia harbored within. The darshana (attainment of peace) is an eventuality of the vada (the war within). No war … no peace! No war within is a suicide in other words … Tangste pretyaabhigacchhanti ye kechaatmahano janaah || One who persihes without fighting the ignorance and inertia harbored within is the worst of all suicides. Therefore, a true vada (a truthful fight against one's own ignorance and inertia - you may want to call the vaccine, Tattva Vimarsha) is very essential to attain The Peace (Tattva Darshana) … after all a war is a war … things can go wrong … but it is definitely better than a suicide … definitely better than being consumed by our own tendencies as time passes over rendering no resistance like a pashu … Off course, the vada has the most vicious side effect that it itself can become the biggest vasana … well, as far as one is cognizant of the vada and its vicuous side effects, it is good and … that is the only way. The clouds of our ignorance and inertia become thinner and thinner as our truthfulness in our Tattva Vada intensifies in our internal search for the truth (Vada should be pitched against one's own well- established stupidity NOT ON THE STUPIDITY WISHFULLY PERCEIVED IN OTHERS!). Clarity of the truth (Tattva darshana) naturally increases as the clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner and thinner … it is an eventuality that we look forward to so that we can finally perform your wonderful suggestion – SHUT UP! Till then … let us poor things perform the ritual waging the war within. Once in a while, please keep peeping in to remind us that we really wage it only for the correct reason (to burn the ignorance within) and only on the correct targets (to uproot the inertia within). That is helpful. THANK YOU. Respects. Naga Narayana ------------------------------- Dear sadaks, Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' This is what Bagavan said to Arjuna. Bagavan said, " What is use of knowing all knowledge when I (bagavan) is right in front of you " . Means do not worry of Sadanas, Karmas, Scripts, knowledge on Sat etc when the SAT (bagavan) has comes. That is surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan who will take care of all the good what knowledge could give and also eradicate all vasanas, Karmas by HIS sankalpa itself. We have been trying over several births and still landing here. But if Bagavan tries you, the there is no any obstacle to liberate. But if Bagavan wants to try one, then he must have Niskama Prema Bakthi, which Bagavan has said in Geetha. Jai Sri Krishna baiya sathyanarayan =========================================== Happy new year 2009 to all sadhaks Thanks for your co-operation and guide regarding Gita 2.16 pawan singhal -------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The Q of Venuji had two facets. One re the object of this Satsanga Forum. While I am not in any way a Founder of this Forum but as I see there is a common thread binding all Sadhaks - Swamiji Shri Ramsukhdasji Maharaj and Holy Gita. The sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal- beyond all faiths and religions- covering humanity at large. This forum is in my view at present " evolving " and the deliberations are getting divine and divine. We , in fact, can easily state that we are part of a Jnana Yagya within the meaning of Holy Gita. Hence I don't see any limitations on the scope of this forum. Since Holy Gita encompasses entire humanity , both principles and practice of ideal human conduct - I see nothing wrong in our addressing any type of problems faced by Sadhaks in their spiritual journey. All my personal views as one of the many Sadhaks of this divine group. Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Dear all , Yes , if we can implement the teachings of gita , in our day to day living , not only will it make life Less stressful , but more meaningful . After all we live in our communities and mingle / work / interact, so i Feel as long as we understand The true meaning (spirit of the message ) of the message sought to be Conveyed by the gita and try & Impact the same in our lives , things will be much better . In short ,what we want to be is better human beings , because only than can we be better Parents / children / friends / spouses /sadhaks / teachers/ Rgds Arvind Malhotra ---------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The very existence is " SAT " . Those who have experienced the characteristics of " SAT " and ever changing function of nature- " ASAT " , they in practice experience " their obvious , self proven, natural, automatic positioning in the existence viz SAT . In their experience there is nothing known as ASAT existing. In other words in their experience only SAT is existing- nothing else is existing. Such great people are called " tattva darshibhih " . In their experience only their positioning in SAT- imperishable, permanent, ever present existence- remains. Through that positioning they get highest rewards. In BG 2:16- the term " ubhayorapi " - represents " conscience " ! " Antah " - represents " element knowledge " !! " Drishtah " - represents " experience " !!! Meaning thereby that " conscience has transformed ( " transition " term as used by the questioner) in to the experiential knowledge and now what has remained is SAT - existence only! This is the highest state of Jnana Yoga!! The Highest reward! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16). Swamiji has been very clear about this... " Real " (Sat) is our natural state. Natural is what needs no effort. It is ever attained. It simply IS. Be situate in it. The essence (Real) is always there - will always be there. The real is not created. The unreal is created from the Real, stays in the real and then merges in the real. It has no existence of its own. One has to simply give importance to ones own experience. No need to believe in the scriptures. Your existence always IS. What is NOT can never exist. The IS always remains IS. To experience 'I AM', no effort is required. No practice. There is no doubt of our existence. The real essence is our existence. The base, the foundation of all appearance - of all creation. That is Paramatma (Supreme Consciousness,God). Meera Das Ram Ram ---------------------------- This is the sanest stuff I heard in a while! Hare Krishna! Gurunath Prakash ---------------------------- GITA TALK GROUP GUIDELINES: 1. Purpose of the group is to help Sadhakas clarify their doubts related to Gitaji shalokas. Therefore, responses which further clarify the understanding of Gitaji, will only be posted. 2. Wherever possible, please quote Gitaji or other scriptures to substantiate your response. 3. Kindly limit personal feelings, opinions, beliefs etc. to the extent that they further help in understanding the Gita shlokas 4. Please be as concise and to the point as possible, respecting sadhaka's time. 5. Kindly focus your writing to the subject at hand only. 6. Please do not include links to the other sites or other organizations. 7. Kindly do not include your personal information such as phone number, address etc. 8. Please do not address the response to a particular individual since the message is going to the entire group. 9. Due to the large readership, all responses may not be posted. 10. Moderator at his discretion, may modify the posting, if content is unclear or not appropriate for distribution to the group. 11. Please respond taking into consideration the novices, youth, westerners, non-sectarian audience. Kindly limit the use to Sanskrit words only, rather provide the English word with Sanskrit bracketed wherever possible. MODERATOR Ram Ram ------------------------ Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Dear Sadhak Community (1) Is the purpose of this forum only to discuss the meaning behind Gita slokas? and / or (2) interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life? (By practical life, I mean one living the normal life while in the quest for God, Gita does not shun the karma, but the attachment towards it) While I understand both are important, Gita is directing its readers like us to grow from Tatwa vaadibhi (one who reads and discusses about the essential element) to tatva darsibhi (one who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat'). I am particularly and practically interested in this transition, because some of the comments from my fellow sadhaks like 'then the soul leaves the body','everything has nothing, while nothing has every thing' while the same people are also suggesting 'no one may have seen God' 'Tatvadarsibhi' (who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat') is referred in Gita 2:16 of Sankhya Yoga. Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' here. Let me know your views on the transition. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- FOLLOW-UP Gita also says - 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - not waiting for God's hand. ---------------------------- NEW POSTING Shree Hari- Dear Moderator, My hands have been tied, and thus it must remain, for the good of myself and others. I have always inferred that absolute desire for the Truth, and the primordial cry to GOD, has awesome power, and will be answered. What I have pasted below is a mute response to Sister Shashikalaji's question to me, an answer in silence. This is what I wrote when dealing with more than I thought possible. but GOD gives only what you can take, I wrote it about ten or eleven years ago.(I knew nothing of Jeeva, and the wisdom of Sanatana Dharma, at that time). That Is Me If my soul is racked in pain, and every fiber of being cries out in remorse of past deeds. It's just me. And my body goes numb with fear, with screaming voices hunting me, with anger and indignation rising within. That's me. Falling to the ground, my heart broken in disbelief and awful horror, deep mourning for a lost beloved. Simply me. Laying in sad loneliness of passing life, passing through the void of death to new life and the joy of birth. Again is me. Watching in horror at mans insanity, turning the cross of joy and hope into a symbol of greatest darkness. That's me. Feeling the joy and bliss of the angels embrace, and the breathtaking divine love of God. Yes that's me. MK With Respect and Divine Love, Mike (Keenor) ---------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram What Mike has written, is a clear indication that just like the law of gravity existed even before Newton's discovery, similarly Sanatana Dharma existed even before it's discovery. From Gita Talk Moderators, Ram Ram ----------------------------- Hari Om Venuji ! You have skipped many of questions raised by me. You said: When death arrives, bottle breaks and water gets back to the ocean. After death, there is no B1, B2 and B3, right? I say: Wrong ! Absolutely wrong !! You don't go back to ocean till you are liberated. Death is just change of cloths- you keep travelling in various bodies till you are emancipated. Read Gita again not for a tip or two, but for very knowledge as to who you are, why you are, what are you doing, and what you should be doing. You say: Man has to pay for his own karma in this birth itself that is very much evident. If I negligently drive the car, I am sure to make accidents. I say: It is not at all evident- where is the Q of " very much evident " ? People walking on footpaths can also get hit without being negligent. Read newspapers on a daily basis. You say: Gita warns us to be more responsible and be skillful in our actions or karma. I say: Again wrong ! " Yogah Karmashu kausalam " does not mean that yoga is skillful karmas. It means- In doing Karmas, skill is Yoga (Equanimity) ! Skill is an adjective/ respect given to Equanimity not to karmas. You say: Again like I said I am focusing on Gita messages which are down-to- earth. I say: There is no message of Gita which is not down to earth. You Say: I am not there yet where I have experienced God in every human being and treated them the same way, no I am not there yet. I say: Make that your goal for balance life. Gita, Saints, Scriptures, Satsanga help you there. Believe in them. You have power of belief given to you by God. Utilise that more often than not, particularly on spiritual matters. Else prove to us that you never 'believed' ! You say: At the times Gita was documented, our ancestors do not have as much writing / editing tools that have today. They have documented what has been practiced by many for 100s of years before in a very brief manner. I say: You have not seen the enormity of Scriptures of Sanatan Dharma. Vedas, Puranas, Smritis, Upnishads, Mahabharata, Ramayana, Ramcharitmans, Gita - who says they are brief? You say: God has given man intellect and ......... We need to use that to the fullest extent before seeking help from God... Use intellect and do karmas skillfully, but do not desire the fruits. Desire for fruits causes expectations, microscopic changes in brain. These changes are waiting forces (papas or sins) which will spring up, when the expectations are not met, causing uncontrollable emotions for men. Is that not a rational? I Say: Microscopic changes occur in not only mind but in every element belonging to nature. " To change " is essential characteristics of nature. Microscopic changes do not necessarily result in 'sins' ! Can't they result in virtues? Besides, mind/intellect you have also been given power of discrimination. One should use that also ! What kind of use you can make of those elements which do not remain static even for a fraction of a second ? There is nothing wrong in throwing the mind into a dust bin after you have used it for performance of your duties. Recommended for you, too ! Use 'viveka' more than mind. Former never changes unlike the latter. You say: Your question on rebirth, hut and palace, difference between children of same parents. Hut and palace " how is this connected with a rebirth? If parents are wealthy, children are born in palace. By your statement, you believe that who are born in huts have done (sins), in palace have done virtues (Punya). Do not you see that is just chance but not karma? I say: Yes ! I believe and have reasons to believe that past life virtues/sins (karmas) produce this life births. No I don't see that it is just a chance. If I do believe in what you say I will fall within the ambit of BG 16:8 ! I have support of Sanatan Dharma behind me ! What is the use of reading Gita if we can't distinguish between soul and body? Gita is not some novel or fiction ! You say: If so, how come Gandhi is not born in a hut chooses to live in huts to be close to common man? Obama, born of a poorman, now is US president. Gandhi is great because he made great karmas, not because he was born great!! I say: " Prior " life karmas cause rebirths. You are unnecessarily talking about " present " life karmas. Totally irrelevant. You say: Accidents " since you believe in karma, you asked such question. I say: Don't you believe in karma? Read your preceding paragraph. You say: Same thing with accidents. To answer your questions, when accidents happened more people died when they did not wear safety helmets/ safety belts. I say: Have you never heard of accidental deaths even when safety helmets/seat belts are fully in position. You say: If your statement has to be true, we do not need courts to punish criminals, because every task is governed by past life karma. Sorry about it!! I say: Who said " every task is governed by past life karma " ? Please do not rely too much on your mind. It changes !! We are talking about re birth Dear Sir ! You say: Difference in children of the same parents - it is all due to DNA genetic. I say: What causes that difference, when parents are same ?? Reply ! Chance/luck/karmas ?? Read BG 16:8 and BG 8:19 ! You say: I did not understand your question on Krishna, sorry so I cannot answer the same. I say: I can appreciate why you can not understand and reply. This will have to be understood if not now , then tomorrow or may be say 100 aeons later. We can't run away from it. Better do it in this human birth only. You say: So when I read Gita or other puranas, I cannot switch of my rationale if there are some questions around it. I do not think our ancestors expected that too. I say I believe that our ancestors were wiser and far far better than us and expected many things which are even yet beyond us. There are times when one has to switch off what you call rationale (mind) and simply Believe ! We have to believe! In fact you are all along believing only, but you don't know that you are believing ! That is MAYA !! Over to Brother Mike and Shashikalaji !! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B ------------------------------- -Shree Hari- Dear Audrey, Please ask me to clarify my response, with a direct question, that would help me a lot. Thanks. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike (Keenor). ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING thought this may be of value dinesh Become givers, not takers: Spiritualists Patel, Dinesh -------------------------------- Hari Om I often used to wonder as to why Swamiji wrote a separate article in many books on " Yogah Karmashu Kaushalam " stated in BG 2:50. Then I thought that it is to establish importance of " Equanimity " in practical life. But when I read interpretation of Mr Venu along with his theory of sins and concept of no re-birth , it occurred to me how great 'visionary' (of trends in Kaliyuga) was Swamiji Ramsukhdasji Maharaj. No Mr Venu ! It does not mean - " Cleverness in doing karmas is Yoga " . It means - In doing karma equanimity(yoga) is skill ! Here the term " kaushalam " ( cleverness/skill) is an adjective/respect/ glory (mahimaa) of " equanimity " not of karmas. Chaos in the world will emerge if the interpretation taken by you is held valid. What to say when it is with your theory of incurring sin and no rebirth ! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Jai Hanuman Mr Venu ! Replies to some of your observations, please kindly keep an open mind. These are not criticisms. We are all only sadhaks. You said that Gita is neither directly nor indirectly suggesting us to switch off our brains. Reply is that in fact Gita is both directly and indirectly suggesting us to switch off our brains !! Post a separate Q on this. We shall tell you as to how, Jee ! Belief can be very powerful and must not be underestimated. Can you prove your parents " other than by just belief " ? You don't remember your birth- no body does ! Now how a human being can prove as to who is his father without " believing " based on " personal knowledge " ? No way- I repeat no way !! Be sure, you will not be able to do that - because births/rebirths are always and exclusively subject matter of " belief " only, never never of " acquired knowledge " - PURE MINDLESS BELIEF !! Come on, Jee ! Argue !! Else " accept " !!! On one hand we can't prove this life birth without belief and you are talking about eternal father and eternal scriptures of Sanatan Dharma ?? Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala ---------------------------- Radhey Radhey The interpretation by Mr Venu of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " reminds me of what is stated in BG 18:32. It squarely opposite of what is reality and highly dangerous. " skilled karmas " are not " yoga " - as Mr Venu right from his first message to the last repeating, repeating and repeating. It can not be so. If this view is held true, then a thief who does theft skillfully will be declared to be a YOGI !! This interpretation along with his novel and unique theory of " change in mental metabolism " causing the sins, and mindless insistence upon theory of no re birth etc - may put him on a wrong path- spiritually. The best thing which has happened therefore for him, by Divine Will, is that he has come in touch with this divine, self less, real satsanga site ! He should thank his " prior karmas " for the same and rather than trying to teach should equip himself " mentally " to learn. Swamiji has written an entire chapter on the subject of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " . Here the skilled word has been used to GLORIFY the yoga. It means - Yoga is the skill in karmas. Your karmas become non binding only when YOGA is in them. YOGA means EQUANIMITY. Hence practice of equanimity in doing karma is skill. Nisha Chatterji -------------------- Jai Hanuman So you say, not only say, insist so frequently that " clevery executed karma " is Yoga under Gita 2:50 ! Sins get incurred only when the expectations are not met as some chemical reaction takes place in the brain and that " cleverness " of the execution of karmas is vitiated ! There is no rebirth, therefore no worry for future ! You think that some body does " ghor karma " (evil deed) very cleverly and succeeds in that, then he does not incur any sins? Now think !! Rethink ! Please read Swamiji's messages on Karma Yog / past Gita Talk messages and kindly get back to us with your findings! What Mike Bhaiyya ! It is so simple to be " Yogi " Jee !! Yogi under Holy Gita, Brother ! Dhanya Ho !! Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala ---------------------- Shri Hari The theory advanced by Venuji about incurring of sins, caused by change in mental chemistry is surprising. Almost each of his concepts need a thorough re-orientation. Good that he has reached here somehow. Let this soul get direction. Shyama Chhangani ------------------------ Mr Venu ! It is my feeling that the observations, the logic, the theories advanced in your note have not been influenced by sadhak messages in this forum, such as the discussion on " Vasudeva Sarvam " " Divine is everywhere " . Let us all be open to listening to new ideas and being brief in our own usage of words and experience the divinity in this forum! Regards Khan Jarsingh ------------------------------- My Salutations to all in this forum Interesting, really very very intersting !Will experienced and learned sadhaks clarify in detail as to whether the theories so painstakingly advanced by Mr Venu K. are correct ? I have not so far during my 6/7 month association with this forum come across concepts as such. I am more interested in his theory regarding sins and his interpretation that nicely/skillfully/cleverly executed actions make a person " yogi " under Gita. If that is so, then I think it is very simple to be " yogi " and a lot of humanity gets covered by this definition. Does Gita confirm that when expectations are not met, there are changes in the brain chemistry? Well, yes, it is difficult to establish re birth. I am eagerly looking forward to deliberations. Please also explain what is this " vaadibhi " and " darshibhi " and Gitacharya stated by Mr Venu ? Thanks Luca B --------------------------- Dear Sadhaks > > Amazing and novel theories put forward nu so laboriously 1. Theory of Rebirth 2. Theory reg Poulation increase 3 Yoga under Gita 4. Practicing vis a vis talking about Gita - need for practical living of Gita 5. Theory reg change in brain to initiate sinful conduct 6.. Mind vs Belief . Mike Keenor please clarify your response as it appeared somewhat vague. Thanks, Audrey Rodrigues ------------------------- PRIOR POSTING -Shree Hari- Dear Venu Komanduri, Firstly I will reiterate what I first quoted: Yoga Aphorism Concentration II 39 : When he is fixed in non-receiving he gets the memory of past life. Swami Vivekananda made no bones about, it he said the memory of past life is the first power a yogi obtains. Now you can say all of this is lunacy, that really is fine by me. Lord Krishna told Arjuna about the reality of rebirth/past life. Chapter 2 Even as a man casts off his worn-out clothes And then clothes himself in others which are new So the embodied casts off worn-out bodies And then enters into others which are new. (22) Of that which is born, death is sure, Of that which is dead, birth is sure. Over the unavoidable, Therefore you never should lament. (27) Chapter 4 The Holy Lord said: Many the births that I have passed– Many passed by you, Arjuna. I have full knowledge of them all, While you do not, Scorcher of Foes. (5) Many more examples, I am not sure how one rationalizes this to mean something else. Actually I will tell you something, if you apply fierce logic in your quest, not backing away from your task to be at one with the universal truth, then all your questions will melt away, but hold onto your hat! 'It is by means of their actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives.' With all due respect your water bottle analogy is like comparing, sardines to bananas. Looking at the logic of the water analogy no mater what form or where those molecules go, they remain those molecules. Now the eternal self is not mega water molecules, but the individual eternal soul, that may become part of the whole plain of oneness but remains like a water molecule that one individual, just like the one water molecule now in the ocean is existent for all of existence. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike (Keenor). --------------------------- Dear sadaks, Sri Venu Komandurisays-- Bagavan suggests tattva darsibhi is better and there is NO appeal. !08 upanashids mentions here and there that it (Upanashids) unable to describe GOD. They why strain on tattva vadibhi. By sticking and practicing SAT? Means deataching to objects and emotions, strongly knowing in mind the dear and near can collapse any time, one came alone and goes alone, all things on earth is only visible by Maya, amount of input of attachment is sorrow of same amount later, Maanusha degam Dullabam, just pretend that one is affectionate, attached, caring and perform actions (karmas) only at body level, always in Anniyachitha of Bagavan. Talking about SAT one has abosolutely NO knowledge how IT is. Can just say what imagined or very little known. One does not see Air but can feel. God is very clearly said HE is Apprameyam. Means no pramanam, not object, cannot be seen or felt by any human senses. Then HIS sankalpa to take a form and show us HIS vision. In Srimat Bagavat it is very clear about GOD told by Elephant Gajendra- HE is AKKILA KARANAM, ARPUTHA KARANAM, NISH KARANAM. May be it contradictory but has wonderful message that is said in Bagavath Geetha Transition- Like birds migrating from one place to other. Like changing cloths. In Saffire dress or Pyjama, or suit you are the same person. When Jeva leaves it takes with it it`s own Karmas, Vasanas, Dana & Dharm, Paapa & Puniya etc that was experienced on earth and NOTHING materialistically from earth. In case Jeeva leaves without anything said above, it travels on Archanathi Marg northern side of earth and reaches Paramathuma. Jai Sri Krishna B.Sathyanarayan ----------------------- Venuji, please clarify your perspective. In my eyes there appear to be vaccilation between belief and mind. Thakurlingam ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear sadaks, Once soul leaves the body, it takes nothing of worldly things is the meaning. A crorepathi on death can never carry with him anything, even his body except his own cause and effects (Karmas). Of course many has seen GOD in the past. But we never believed them. We insulted them as " Chitta Brama " . We never knew their Chitta was with Brama. Mother Andal in SriRangam has seen God. Thrirupan Alwar, Nandanar, Kannaper, Samartha Ramadoss, Bradrachalla Ramadoss, Shridi Sai Baba, Ramana Rishi, Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa showed God to Vivekanath. Paramathuma is NOT object has been discussed so many times. HE is to be known through Gyana/Bakthi. In Srimath Bagavath it is said that Bakthi Maatha unable to wake up her 2 children Gyana and Virag as Kali was Born. For a person with poorna faith, he can see God in many. For a person with distrubed & uncertain faith, even if God appears he will start thinking whether it is illusion, just like Duryodan saw Viswaroop. For Valmiki with years of Ram Naam Ant hill covering him, never lost faith. Fraction of faith lost, will show no any results. Though in Bible, the example is nice. Christ was walking on water. A disciple also wanted to walk on water. Christ said come. He walked on water. But as he was waliking on water, a doubt came in his mind , " What if I sink " . He sank. Christ said to disciple, " When you lost faith- faithlessness sank you " . Sri Ragavendar Swamy in his teen age gave food to Sri Krishna Idol which never ate. He profusly cried to extent of fainting, Sri Krishna came and ate. So was in case of Namadev. Mother Yasoda said today I will tie up Krishna. She tried with a rope and it was getting short of 2 Inches. When she surrendered to Sri Krishna saying with love,' Oh Krishna I cannot tie you. Bagavan gave HIS hip to be tied. Bakthi (physical surrender), intellect (Mind surrender), faith (Budhi Surrender) known as Trikarna Sudhi, Bagavan appears in the form you desire. Purpose of this forum is to impart Gyana so that one can see God. Guru (this forum) shows the way, it is up to one to catch up fast with faith. Have faith on a stone, Bagavan appears. Jai Sri Krishna --------------------------- Dear Sadhakom There is a hot response for my posting. Thank you all for giving me an opportunity to explain what I said and try to answer your questions. Before that I want to mention 3 of points here: (a) We all who participated in this posting believe in God, I believe we differ in how we perceive God. I do not see and do not expect you would see this as an anomaly as we are all seeking the same target in different paths (types of yoga). (b) All sadhaks may not be at the same level of sadhana and making spiritual progress at same speed. I may be at basic level and you may be at advanced stages. There is no measure to it. © Please show tolerance / constraint to different view points – when you have 6 billion people, they all could be different. Being in the advanced stages, a sadhak will show more constraint towards others (I do not need to read or quote from Gita for this simple fundamental on human relations) Since our moderator advised brevity, I will try to follow the same, but cannot be sure of the same: I studied Gita (mainly the first 7 chapters repeatedly and others once) and was relating many of the down-to-earth messages of Gitacharya to my own personal life to remove tensions, developing relationship with my fellow citizens around and writing my own observations in a dairy. When I joined this forum, the topics postings suggested to me the sadhaks are in advanced stage of saadhana. As I went through the communication, I was not clear on some statements from the sadhaks connected with postings like `samaadhi / moksha', expressions like `soul leaving body' if they have visualized these states and responding. If I were you I would not venture to answer the posting like on samaadhi vs moksha, without experiencing both the states. So my posting was to get some clarity on the practice / examples own experiences. Mike – I understood your writing then and now the same way, no disagreement with you on it. I only brought an additional point, in support of viewing Gita from different angles. Gita is neither directly nor indirectly suggesting us to switch off our brains. Use our skills and intellect, question our way up so we may progress and make the progress in a best way – is what I meant by `yogah karmasu kousalam', is also stated in Gita again as `muktasanjna karma samaacharh'. On rebirth, let me know how the following contradicts Gita? God is of many forms. For simplicity of understanding, let us say divine (purusha or Lord) form and non-divine form (prakriti – Nature). If I consider divine form as a divine ocean (water), man takes birth as the water enters into a bottle. Water + bottle(B) = man. There could be different men B1, B2, B3 etc.We identify the characteristics of the bottle (the color, the shape) to water also, so we see different men (with different colors and shapes). When death arrives, bottle breaks and water gets back to the ocean. After death, there is no B1, B2 and B3, right? It is all gone back to divine form (to God). In ocean you do cannot trace the water thrown back. There will be births from the ocean, but nothing cannot be called `rebirth'. Sorry I cannot prove it, no way different from that you cannot prove rebirths – other than believing our scriptures. Its 50: 50 chance, right? But see this: If rebirths are to be accepted as the fact (other than just belief), there has be to be 1:1. (I am taking India as an example here) How come the population exploded from 350 million to about 1000 million in about last 35 years and not before? Are we to assume that more living beings are transmuting to human beings now? I am not suggesting the above is truth, but a view point. I am open to criticism here, but be logical in what you say. Man has to pay for his own karma in this birth itself that is very much evident. If I negligently drive the car, I am sure to make accidents. Gita warns us to be more responsible and be skillful in our actions or karma. Again like I said I am focusing on Gita messages which are down-to-earth, I am not there yet where I have experienced God in every human being and treated them the same way, no I am not there yet. Vyasji At the times Gita was documented, our ancestors do not have as much writing / editing tools that have today. They have documented what has been practiced by many for 100s of years before in a very brief manner. That is the reason there are so many written commentaries about same one Gita from different great people later and there could be other reasons also. Different perspectives!! God has given man intellect and an area of independence. Within that area man has the control and beyond it others, society, nature and God. We need to use that to the fullest extent before seeking help from God. This is not `egoism', this is use of the God-gifted assets. Use intellect and do karmas skillfully, but do not desire the fruits. Desire for fruits causes expectations, microscopic changes in brain. These changes are waiting forces (papas or sins) which will spring up, when the expectations are not met, causing uncontrollable emotions for men. Is that not a rational? Is that not what our modern psychology saying? 1000s of years after Gita said the truth!! The more I see the rationality behind Gita messages, the more my admiration grows to Gitacharya. Your question on rebirth, hut and palace, difference between children of same parents. Hut and palace – how is this connected with a rebirth? If parents are wealthy, children are born in palace. By your statement, you believe that who are born in huts have done (sins), in palace have done virtues (Punya). Do not you see that is just chance but not karma? If so, how come Gandhi is not born in a hut chooses to live in huts to be close to common man? Obama, born of a poorman, now is US president. Gandhi is great because he made great karmas, not because he was born great!! Accidents – since you believe in karma, you asked such question. Did you every try blindly running across a heavy traffic of cars? You would not and I would not, because we know it is not safe, nothing to do with past life karma. Same thing with accidents. To answer your questions, when accidents happened more people died when they did not wear safety helmets / safety belts. If your statement has to be true, we do not need courts to punish criminals, because every task is governed by past life karma. Sorry about it!! Difference in children of the same parents - it is all due to DNA – genetic. If you are interested and want to be rational, you can search internet on `DNA', you will get tons of information. I did not understand your question on Krishna, sorry so I cannot answer the same. Critical examination – this word may have pained you and may be others also, I apologize if it did. That's what happens when our beliefs are hurt. I went through this painful experience when I read `Indian Philosophy' by former Indian President S.Radhakrishnan, which talks about how the 6 systems of Indian philosophy have originated, scriptures – Vedas, Upanishads and epics were (and what times) compiled. My beliefs to perceive God in human form (like Vishnu, Shiva etc) was deeply hurt. However, I had go through that pain and overcome that to now have broader belief system. Please do not be under the impression that `critical examination' is going aginst a system or philosophy. Its mindset to probe and ask questions to gather more information about whatever you do /read or study. I am not saying `right' information. Certain things do not sound logical and need deep understanding / reading of other books. Lot of people will be surprised to know that Indian geometry (mathematics) originated from or for `aagama' shastra. (To know more about it type `sulabha sutras' in Google). And now we know that sciences originated and proliferated into many branches from mathematics. So when I read Gita or other puranas, I cannot switch of my rationale if there are some questions around it. I do not think our ancestors expected that too. If so, I am wondering if so many commentaries on Gita or other scriptures are necessary. Shasaikalaji You talked about `luck' and it depends on how define `luck'. Take a minute and try to define the word `luck' or see a dictionary. We use this word in general, whether we believe in it or not, even I use it and I do not believe in it. There is positive way of having `luck' and conventional way of using it. If some one gets lottery or promotion or money, we say `he is lucky'. Is that what you mean? I consider I am lucky when I read a nice poem in `bhagavatam' that God gave me a mind to enjoy to my fullest extent. Can a billionaire enjoy that poem as much as I do if God has not given him that mind (bank balance does not change it). He can buy a top model car/ building, not the mind. He has to use his own, good or bad. Holy Gita, Ramayana or Bharata – God never said follow everything blindly. When it occurs to your brain, even if it is Vedas, Upanishads, please do have question on that, but most obediently, so the beliefs are not hurt. Your questions enrich your belief, like I explained in my note to Vyasji. Energy comes to us when we are open to criticism and same way we lose energy when we react negatively to a criticism. We are human beings with emotions. So being a science student is not that I am a scientist or any big person, the tendency to be inquisitive. Mind and belief – Can you define `mind' for me? Its is difficult, of course, our dictionaries provide definition, you can say it a `collection of thoughts, feelings and emotions'. Your beliefs come out of your `mind' and are an intense emotion. Belief is one you think is right (whether that is right or wrong for society or others). You may derive the knowledge your belief from books, parents, society and they are likely to change naturally or by force. I believe that `Vaada' is very important aspect of learning and being open about `vaada' is equally important too, I would encourage you to read the chronology of Indian scriptures, so we will have a better perspective of how much our ancestors struggled to store their wisdom for us, how they transmitted the same through generations. Sorry I took lot of your time/space, Moderatorji!!! Venu Komanduri SUMMARY OF SADHAK RESPONSES Ram Ram - No scripture recommends only tattva-vada (reading/discussing only) - Interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! - Sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal. It addresses principles and practice of ideal human conduct. All issues can be addressed. - As clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner, clarity increases - " tattva darshibhih " remain only SAT (Existence) - " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16) - Sadhak is to be tattva darsibhi (by living/practicing 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). - It is no about simply waiting for God to do. - It is by means of sadhak's actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. - The great souls, these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. - Surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan and all vasanas will be eradicated - Bhagwan will reveal himself to his children and bring his children together in the way they resort to Him. - Have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for yourr life (lessons from other pilgrims) - Implementing Gita teachings - KEY to betterment - Practices Gita in one's life probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion - Yes! one has to " live " Gita principles. There is no doubt, No contradiction. - Without cause-effect (rebirth), what causes such inequanimity in births, situations, circumstances etc.? - Critical Examination of Gita/God, is it possible? - Paramatma is not easily conquerable by our critical thinking etc. - Aren't Mind / Belief opposite / separate subjects altogether? - No need to believe in theories, believe your own experience - God and His creation are all one - WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life. KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFEBELT - GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. - THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth. Ram Ram ---------------------------- NEW POSTING -Shree Hari- Dear Venu Komanduri, Thanks for your comments on my post. I like to mention to you at first, that I have spent my whole life in the field of electronics, logic was one of my favorite subjects. There came a time in my life when logic, and common sense were confounded. (You will have to take my word on that, there will be hundreds of sadhaks who will understand what I am saying). Actually I was putting the opposite spin on the common view, that is practicing intuitively, maybe from the inner conscience a way of life, searching all avenues for answer to the paradoxes of existence. One must remember, there are many great souls in the world who have never heard of the Bhagavad Gita, and when they come across it they are amazed. Analize carefully what I wrote: 'It is by means of their actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives.' I really do not think I implied one should await for GOD, if it appeared that way I apologize. B.G. 11: Prostrating in adoration, do I crave Forgiveness: as a father forgives his son, A friend his dear friend, and a lover his love†" Thus even so should You forgive Me, O God. (44 Overjoyed am I, seeing Your form, and yet My mind is distracted with terror. Show me, In mercy Lord, only Your previous form†" O Lord of gods, Abode of the universe. (45 Purely out of interest what do you make of that from a logical approach. You ask about transition, it can come slowly a gently path, or fierce and fast, like fire. But whatever, " You keep chopping wood, and fetching water " . B.G. 2: Attached to pleasure and power Their minds are drawn away by this Speech, and to them is not granted The insight from meditation. (44) The introspective ones I talk of, ponder meditate, these 'Pilgrims', prefer a quiet life, you know scientists, technocrats, woodchoppers, whatever, but they do not seek glory. To quote you: 'I do not trust in rebirth, saying that 'people suffer from the karma of previous births' Talking of Yogis, or Yogis to be: Yoga Aphorism: Concentration II: (39). When he is fixed in none receiving, he gets the memory of past life. B.G. 18 And even that man who hears this, Full of faith and free from scoffing, He, liberated, shall attain The happy worlds of the righteous. (71) Has this been heard, O Pritha’s son, By you with a one-pointed mind? Moreover, has the delusion Of your ignorance been destroyed? (72) Arjuna said: Yea, destroyed is my delusion, And I have gained my memory Through Your grace, and my doubts are gone. I am firm; I will do Your word. (73) I hope my friend I have answers some of your questions, I can only tell you the truth as I see it. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ---------------------------- Hari Om Dear Mr Venu It is great to note that your kind self respects Gita except some portions of it. I have few questions. Kindly oblige by replying to the same. Please use your rational/logical mind and sharp intellect while responding so that we may reap maximum benefits. What is that " cleverness " which you referred while giving your version of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " ? Since you don't believe in rebirth, hence by your logical and rational sharp mind/intellect/ego please enlighten us as to how one child gets born in a hut and another in a palace? Is it pure coincidence or there are some laws behind the same? Why one should abstain from evil conduct? Why not, at least when one is sure of death, one should reap maximum pleasure from the world , by whatever means, as there will no rebirth to pay for_ Since there are no sins/virtues accumulating? What/Who leaves a live body so as to make it a corpse? How come 2 children of same parents have differences, inspite of living in same environment? How come in an accident one survives while another does not? Your more learned views are also solicited on that " karma kanda/swarga bhog " verses of Gitaji referred by you. What according to you may be the reasons of Lord Krishna advising us not to fall prey to the enticement of Karma Kand of Vedas? You said Sir that Krishna lives in all beings. Can you enlighten us as to why and for what time and since when? " Critical examination of Gita " - what according to you makes that necessary? Who is qualified to conduct that examination? What should be the basis of such exercise? How it should be conducted- any yardsticks in your logical/rationale mind ? Your elaborate views are solicited for benefit of us all. Most of the Sadhaks in this forum , including me, have more belief than logic/rationale. Your association and contribution therefore should enrich us. May be in the end you also walk out richer too. I trust you will respond " positively " . Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Jai Hanuman Venuji Maharaj ! I noted your kind advice to our Brother Mike Keenor . I quote below the last para - Kindly elaborate as to what is this " belief " ? Being a science student yourself and luckily ( " luckily " -since you don't believe in rebirth etc-or you don't believe in " luck " also ?) you also have mind and sharp intellect. Naturally , therefore, you critically evaluate everything before any acceptance- even if that is Holy Gita. Then what is this animal called " belief " which you referred in your elaborate advice to Mike Bhaiyya? Where then, Jee, is space for " belief " in your critical/sharp/logical/rational/thinking/evaluating/analytical/energe tic as well as energy producing/imaginative mind and intellect? Are not mind and belief two different and opposite subjects altogether? Like North Pole and South Pole? Bolo Jee! Boliye Sir !! Waiting for a positive response, Jee. Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram What " rationale " what " critical exam " We think, God is that easily conquerable by us? by our rationale and critical examination? Until one realizes the a speck on nothingness that we are compared to God ...then and then only true knowledge will reveal itself (rather we will allow it to flow into us) . We are like that upside down bowl, when it is raining. Swamiji has given this example... that the rain is pouring equallly on all. What can God do if we chose to keep our bowl, upside down? He is equally accessible to all. No one is forcing one to believe. Let us believe in our own experience. All our lives we have been learning only from " cause and effect " no other reason. We avoid fire, because sometime or the other we felt the heat and knew it to be dangerous. We learn from our mistakes, because there is a consequence. There is a price to be paid. We don't need to believe in theories as Swamiji says, just believe in our own experiences(anubhav). Ram Ram ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om. Hinduism never never compels one to read Gita at any point of one's life. There may be crores of hindus pass by their birth without even looking at HOLY GITA. Krushna has never uttered a word that everyone should surely read GIta. Krushna has given us Gita not to just read it and please HIM!!!!!!! He has taken pity on each and everyone of us!!!! We really dont understand the birth cycle at all !!!!! TO Krushna is attached the Vishnu Maya and Krushna is OMNI PRESENT in PRACRUTHI (Nature) !!!! WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life !!!! We keep facing cyclone after cyclone and we get lost in this action of pracruthi (Nature) !!!! Some start losing faith in God as they are shaken as disaster after disaster ruin their life !!!! This continues till we surrender to Krushna and take Gita in our hand. Here comes a great change in our life as KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFE BELT ---GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. He explains in detail the dimensions of nature-pracruthi, what our body is made of, what our mind does, what our intellect does, what is SATH CHITH. He has taken great care to educate us on Sthira Bhuddhi, Ignorance and true knowledge. THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth !!!!! So interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! With regards, Usha Sridhar. ---------------------------- Hari Om Dear Sadhak Venu ! What is your question? I wonder if any sadhak contradicted what you mean to say ! Yes- one has to " live " Gita principles. How and where there is doubt on the same? Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B ---------------------------- Re:Tatwa vaadibhi to tatva darsibhi Venu Komanduri is absolutely right: the ultimate aim is tatva darsibhi, though tatva darsibhi may be the initial step towards that. If an individual gets too attached to discussions and interpretation on Gita, the focus on practice to become tatva darsibhi may be lost. And, when one practices Gita in one's life it is probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion on Gita. I am sure God will help and direct you along the path. If you have learnt that God and His creation are all one, realize that by living your life on that principle even as you have to act as a person distict from others. Difficult. But I try this path hoping that one day God will ensure successful transition to Oneness. Basudeb Sen ---------------------------- Dear Sadhak Community There is a nice response from Mike Keenor, nice in the sense there is outpouring positivism. I approached Gita in many ways - scientific, athiestic and spiritual. From all the angles I see there is immense wisdom stored in Gita. Ever since I have been studying Gita, specially the last 2 years, I am amazed at the down to earth messages. So I remain on earth and talk about the practical messages clearly indicated, they are neither hidden nor hinted, in Gita. Being a science student and in engineering profession, I always question things / dictum before my mind sees the rationale behind them - be it Vedas / Gita or otherwise. There are many slokas in Gita that showers the life management principles even if I study them as an athiest - ignore the fruits of desires (twaktaphalam), live in the 9-holed town (navadwarava pure dehi). Only to say 'critical examination of any scripture' is utmost necessary, I quote from Gita ( 2:42, 2:43, 2:44 ) which suggested not get trapped by the 'karma kanda' /'swargabhoga' (the rituals and the pleasures of the heaven) in the early part of Vedas. That is being rational about the objective of Gita. Despite my strong faith and belief in Gita, I do not trust in rebirth, saying that 'people suffer from the karma of previous births', 'concept of sin / virtue' as account maintained by God or some power. No! I do not!! There can be many interpretations to those words / usages in Gita. Remember that though Gita was documented in 2nd century AD, the slokas were known even before 1500 BC. We are 3500 years from the source and its meaning. Mike - I like your positivism, but Gita is also suggesting 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - meaning there is controllable part the sadhak has to do (not waiting for God's hand), wherever he cannot, he should seek help from others (remember God lives in all). For all this sport of activities, the energy comes from the positivism / belief / imagination /critical thinking /relating the messages to the practical difficulties of life. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram The KARMA issue will be addressed as a separate topic. Kindly stay with one topic and subject at hand. Gita Talk Moderators, Ram Ram ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear Venu Komanduri, B.G. 4 In whatever way they resort To Me do I thus reward them. It is My path which ev'rywhere All men follow, O Arjuna. (11). People the world over from many different faiths, or even non faiths, who started their journey so very long ago, who hear as it were the ringing of the sacred bells, and have a yearning in their hearts for the unknown Beloved, they feel that Love, they know it is there. Do you not think that Divine Krishna would not take his children by the hand and show them the way home, 'The last miles'. It is by means of their actions by their morality and there love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. Do you think HE would not bring his children together so they may find comfort, be supported and support others in Divine Forum. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ----------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Wonderful dear Venu. In other words, you are telling us all to shut up! Yes that is very much required for any serious seeker. You are very right … no scripture recommends tattva-vada. Definitely, tattva-vada can be a potential plague … most often, it is better to be ignorant rather than being a tattava-vadin: Andhantamah pravishanti ye avidyaamupaasate | Tato bhuya iva te tamo ye u vidyaayaam rataah || But, … is there any other way toward becoming a tattva-darshin? Manasaivedamaaptavyam neha naanaasti kinchana || We have to retrace the same path in which we collected our garbage (ignorance and inertia) to remove the same – our minds and bodies. You know, the vaccine is in the very germ! We have to turn the same germ against itself to releive ourselves from our deseases. We are helpless but to indulge in this vada (fight with our own bodily and mental demands) to remove the ignorance and inertia harbored within. The darshana (attainment of peace) is an eventuality of the vada (the war within). No war … no peace! No war within is a suicide in other words … Tangste pretyaabhigacchhanti ye kechaatmahano janaah || One who persihes without fighting the ignorance and inertia harbored within is the worst of all suicides. Therefore, a true vada (a truthful fight against one's own ignorance and inertia - you may want to call the vaccine, Tattva Vimarsha) is very essential to attain The Peace (Tattva Darshana) … after all a war is a war … things can go wrong … but it is definitely better than a suicide … definitely better than being consumed by our own tendencies as time passes over rendering no resistance like a pashu … Off course, the vada has the most vicious side effect that it itself can become the biggest vasana … well, as far as one is cognizant of the vada and its vicuous side effects, it is good and … that is the only way. The clouds of our ignorance and inertia become thinner and thinner as our truthfulness in our Tattva Vada intensifies in our internal search for the truth (Vada should be pitched against one's own well- established stupidity NOT ON THE STUPIDITY WISHFULLY PERCEIVED IN OTHERS!). Clarity of the truth (Tattva darshana) naturally increases as the clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner and thinner … it is an eventuality that we look forward to so that we can finally perform your wonderful suggestion – SHUT UP! Till then … let us poor things perform the ritual waging the war within. Once in a while, please keep peeping in to remind us that we really wage it only for the correct reason (to burn the ignorance within) and only on the correct targets (to uproot the inertia within). That is helpful. THANK YOU. Respects. Naga Narayana ------------------------------- Dear sadaks, Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' This is what Bagavan said to Arjuna. Bagavan said, " What is use of knowing all knowledge when I (bagavan) is right in front of you " . Means do not worry of Sadanas, Karmas, Scripts, knowledge on Sat etc when the SAT (bagavan) has comes. That is surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan who will take care of all the good what knowledge could give and also eradicate all vasanas, Karmas by HIS sankalpa itself. We have been trying over several births and still landing here. But if Bagavan tries you, the there is no any obstacle to liberate. But if Bagavan wants to try one, then he must have Niskama Prema Bakthi, which Bagavan has said in Geetha. Jai Sri Krishna baiya sathyanarayan =========================================== Happy new year 2009 to all sadhaks Thanks for your co-operation and guide regarding Gita 2.16 pawan singhal -------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The Q of Venuji had two facets. One re the object of this Satsanga Forum. While I am not in any way a Founder of this Forum but as I see there is a common thread binding all Sadhaks - Swamiji Shri Ramsukhdasji Maharaj and Holy Gita. The sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal- beyond all faiths and religions- covering humanity at large. This forum is in my view at present " evolving " and the deliberations are getting divine and divine. We , in fact, can easily state that we are part of a Jnana Yagya within the meaning of Holy Gita. Hence I don't see any limitations on the scope of this forum. Since Holy Gita encompasses entire humanity , both principles and practice of ideal human conduct - I see nothing wrong in our addressing any type of problems faced by Sadhaks in their spiritual journey. All my personal views as one of the many Sadhaks of this divine group. Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Dear all , Yes , if we can implement the teachings of gita , in our day to day living , not only will it make life Less stressful , but more meaningful . After all we live in our communities and mingle / work / interact, so i Feel as long as we understand The true meaning (spirit of the message ) of the message sought to be Conveyed by the gita and try & Impact the same in our lives , things will be much better . In short ,what we want to be is better human beings , because only than can we be better Parents / children / friends / spouses /sadhaks / teachers/ Rgds Arvind Malhotra ---------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The very existence is " SAT " . Those who have experienced the characteristics of " SAT " and ever changing function of nature- " ASAT " , they in practice experience " their obvious , self proven, natural, automatic positioning in the existence viz SAT . In their experience there is nothing known as ASAT existing. In other words in their experience only SAT is existing- nothing else is existing. Such great people are called " tattva darshibhih " . In their experience only their positioning in SAT- imperishable, permanent, ever present existence- remains. Through that positioning they get highest rewards. In BG 2:16- the term " ubhayorapi " - represents " conscience " ! " Antah " - represents " element knowledge " !! " Drishtah " - represents " experience " !!! Meaning thereby that " conscience has transformed ( " transition " term as used by the questioner) in to the experiential knowledge and now what has remained is SAT - existence only! This is the highest state of Jnana Yoga!! The Highest reward! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16). Swamiji has been very clear about this... " Real " (Sat) is our natural state. Natural is what needs no effort. It is ever attained. It simply IS. Be situate in it. The essence (Real) is always there - will always be there. The real is not created. The unreal is created from the Real, stays in the real and then merges in the real. It has no existence of its own. One has to simply give importance to ones own experience. No need to believe in the scriptures. Your existence always IS. What is NOT can never exist. The IS always remains IS. To experience 'I AM', no effort is required. No practice. There is no doubt of our existence. The real essence is our existence. The base, the foundation of all appearance - of all creation. That is Paramatma (Supreme Consciousness,God). Meera Das Ram Ram ---------------------------- This is the sanest stuff I heard in a while! Hare Krishna! Gurunath Prakash ---------------------------- GITA TALK GROUP GUIDELINES: 1. Purpose of the group is to help Sadhakas clarify their doubts related to Gitaji shalokas. Therefore, responses which further clarify the understanding of Gitaji, will only be posted. 2. Wherever possible, please quote Gitaji or other scriptures to substantiate your response. 3. Kindly limit personal feelings, opinions, beliefs etc. to the extent that they further help in understanding the Gita shlokas 4. Please be as concise and to the point as possible, respecting sadhaka's time. 5. Kindly focus your writing to the subject at hand only. 6. Please do not include links to the other sites or other organizations. 7. Kindly do not include your personal information such as phone number, address etc. 8. Please do not address the response to a particular individual since the message is going to the entire group. 9. Due to the large readership, all responses may not be posted. 10. Moderator at his discretion, may modify the posting, if content is unclear or not appropriate for distribution to the group. 11. Please respond taking into consideration the novices, youth, westerners, non-sectarian audience. Kindly limit the use to Sanskrit words only, rather provide the English word with Sanskrit bracketed wherever possible. MODERATOR Ram Ram ------------------------ Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 10, 2009 Report Share Posted February 10, 2009 Dear Sadhak Community (1) Is the purpose of this forum only to discuss the meaning behind Gita slokas? and / or (2) interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life? (By practical life, I mean one living the normal life while in the quest for God, Gita does not shun the karma, but the attachment towards it) While I understand both are important, Gita is directing its readers like us to grow from Tatwa vaadibhi (one who reads and discusses about the essential element) to tatva darsibhi (one who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat'). I am particularly and practically interested in this transition, because some of the comments from my fellow sadhaks like 'then the soul leaves the body','everything has nothing, while nothing has every thing' while the same people are also suggesting 'no one may have seen God' 'Tatvadarsibhi' (who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat') is referred in Gita 2:16 of Sankhya Yoga. Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' here. Let me know your views on the transition. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- FOLLOW-UP Gita also says - 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - not waiting for God's hand. ---------------------------- NEW POSTING Dear Sadaks, One Sadak said, " Gita also says - 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - not waiting for God's hand. " Excellent very short explanation. But can we take the line instead of " not waiting for God`s hand " ---AS--- " performing things (Actions) as per God` s will. Jai Sri Krishna B.Sathyanarayan ---------------------------- Dear Sadhak, It is not necessary that a learned person is realized or a realized one is learned. But for sure a realized know all the answers, as they are hidden deep in SELF. We all sadhak/sadhika in this forum are practicing the " Sat " as much as God wants us to. So those who have seen the Truth are also sincerely practicing IT.I have no doubt about that. No ponga pandits here. Now in yr words- (By practical life, I mean one living the normal life while in the quest for God, Gita does not shun the karma, but the attachment towards it) I always quote monkey's story who grabs peas in the fist and wants to take his hand out of the container, but he cannot. To take his hand out of the container he must drop the peas. We want to live a " practical normal life while in quest for God " this very desire to live a normal life is a hindrance to reach God. If someone sincerely wants to reach God, he/she must drop all desires...How can one reach God while holding Sansar tightly ? Now to yr theories about rebirths and yoga. Could you please tell us how the water went into the bottle ? Surely if water goes back to ocean, there is no rebirth, but what if the water keeps on changing bottles? (the same desire which brings water into the bottle will multiply and force water to change different bottles unless it rerealizests true nature and uselessness of bottles) My dear, you have longing for Truth but you are trying to reach it through yr mind. Drop yr mind, drop yr thinking and surrender to Lord Krishna, He will unfold the Truth for you...Believe me it is not difficult. When you will face the Truth, you will laugh and cry at the same time. Trust Lord Krishna, believe in His words, follow His words.... Instead of reading many puranas, just read Gitaji and explanation given by Swamiji.Go deep within,cry for Him, Light will be there. Nasto vidhyate bhavo, nabhavo vidhyate sat..Gitaji Our mind(thought) is the only hindrance in seeing the Truth. Go in deep silence, meditate and attend the thoughtless stage, and you will see the Truth!!! Because only " Sat " Exist... with Love, a sadhika Sadhna Karigar ----------------------------- Rebirth The body made up of bones, flesh, blood etc. is known as the gross body. Inside this gross body is subtle body. This subtle body comprise of 17 elements. They are five senses of knowledge (ears, nose, eyes, tongue and skin), five senses of performing actions (hands, feet, mouth, genital organ and anus), five life-breath (pran, apan, saman, vyan and udan), mind and intellect. These 17 elements constitute the subtle body. Inside this subtle body is causal body which is also known as ignorance-body (agyanmay-kosh) and nature (swabhav). Action holds prominence in gross body, thinking holds prominence in subtle body and positioning holds prominence in causal body. Wake- state is an affair of gross body, dream-state is an affair of subtle body and deep-sleep state (when we don't remember anything) is an affair of causal body. Senses, mind and intellect i.e. subtle body resides in life-breath. At the time of death, this life-breath assembles in heart. When the last breath is exhaled this subtle body (with causal body inside) departs from any of the nine gates of the gross body. This departure of subtle body from gross body is only known as death. Jeeva's next body is determined by last thought. Lord says " Arjun, thinking of whatever entity one leaves the body at the time of death, that and that alone one attains, being ever absorbed in that thought " (Gita 8.6) This subtle body then lives in space. In whichever womb the jeeva has to take next birth it will first go in that male body either through breath or any food particle. He will then make way in female body through sexual intercourse. In one drop of man's semen there are lakhs of jeevas (sperm cells). Out of this only that jeeva which has strong karma relationship and is destined to take birth will find place in female's womb. Rest other jeevas will die. In due course that sperm cell will grow limbs, hands, mouth etc. Then after stipulated time it will come out of womb. This whole process is known as rebirth. It is the subtle body which comes and goes. Lord says " Even as the wind wafts scents from their seat, so, too, the Jivatma, which is the controller of the body etc., taking the mind and senses from the body, which it leaves behind, forthwith migrates to the body which it acquires. " (Gita 15.8) Soul does not come and go anywhere. That thing which comes and goes anywhere is bound by time and space. That thing which is bound by time and space, it can never be imperishable. But soul is imperishable. For the soul, Lord says " Know that alone to be imperishable which pervades this universe " (Gita 2.17) That imperishable element which pervades this universe how can it go from one body to another. No way. Wherever in Gita and other Hindu scriptures it is said that the soul leaves the body etc. it should be taken for the subtle body. Some FAQ 1. When the subtle body departs from gross body why is it not visible? A. It is not visible because it is not a subject of eyes. One sense cannot even perform the same functioning of another sense i.e. smelling, touching, tasting etc. cannot be done by eyes. Subtle body is beyond senses so it cannot be seen, heard, touched etc. 2. The organs like tongue, eyes etc. of the gross body, do these elements belong to subtle body? A. No. Tongue, eyes, hands, mouth etc. are parts of the gross body. The power to hear, touch, see, taste and smell forms the five senses of knowledge of subtle body. Similarly the power to walk, eat and speak, give and take, urinate and passing feces forms the five senses of action of subtle body. All these powers are in life-breath and it appears in respective parts of the body. For example, the power of seeing comes to eyes etc. 3. Where are the five pran located? A. Pran, Apan, Saman, Udan and Vyan respectively reside in heart, anus, navel, throat and entire body. If anyone has knowledge of what today's science has said about the 17 elements of the subtle body, please share with the whole group. Hare Krishna Varun P. Paprunia ----------------------------- Priy Sadhaks I think we shouldnt involve in I say u say. rather we must understand & experience wat geetaji says. Gyata-Gyan-Gyeya drista-darshan-drishya When all three churn upto only one ur Q will be solved. Its ASHABD PAD. ANUBHAVGAMYA. Thanx Raja Gurdasani ---------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram Rajaji or anyone, If possible would appreciate the english meanings. From Gita Talk Moderators ---------------------- Dear Sadhakom Gita has defined yoga in few places. Let us just take one subject at a time. I used (2:50) 'yogah karmasu kausalam' to refer to rationality. Yes, there is already reference of yoga in 2:48 'Yogastah kuru karmani sangam tvatka dhanajnjaya, sidhya asidhyo samobhutva, samatvam yoga uchyate' meaning 'the eqanimity in doing karma'. Here Gitacharya is advising the sadhak to acquire the skill to the karma wthout attchment and with equanimity. Sadhak would need these acquire this qualilites of attachment and equanimity by practice and once one acquire them the sadhak will be in a position 'yogastha' to do them. Here my brethren mistook me that 'acquiring any skill is yogah'. This sloka is down to earth in that whether a person believes in God or not, he attains the results if he acquires this skill. Will talk about law of karma / rebirth as a separate topic. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Shree Hari- Dear Moderator, My hands have been tied, and thus it must remain, for the good of myself and others. I have always inferred that absolute desire for the Truth, and the primordial cry to GOD, has awesome power, and will be answered. What I have pasted below is a mute response to Sister Shashikalaji's question to me, an answer in silence. This is what I wrote when dealing with more than I thought possible. but GOD gives only what you can take, I wrote it about ten or eleven years ago.(I knew nothing of Jeeva, and the wisdom of Sanatana Dharma, at that time). That Is Me If my soul is racked in pain, and every fiber of being cries out in remorse of past deeds. It's just me. And my body goes numb with fear, with screaming voices hunting me, with anger and indignation rising within. That's me. Falling to the ground, my heart broken in disbelief and awful horror, deep mourning for a lost beloved. Simply me. Laying in sad loneliness of passing life, passing through the void of death to new life and the joy of birth. Again is me. Watching in horror at mans insanity, turning the cross of joy and hope into a symbol of greatest darkness. That's me. Feeling the joy and bliss of the angels embrace, and the breathtaking divine love of God. Yes that's me. MK With Respect and Divine Love, Mike (Keenor) ---------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram What Mike has written, is a clear indication that just like the law of gravity existed even before Newton's discovery, similarly Sanatana Dharma existed even before it's discovery. From Gita Talk Moderators, Ram Ram ----------------------------- Hari Om Venuji ! You have skipped many of questions raised by me. You said: When death arrives, bottle breaks and water gets back to the ocean. After death, there is no B1, B2 and B3, right? I say: Wrong ! Absolutely wrong !! You don't go back to ocean till you are liberated. Death is just change of cloths- you keep travelling in various bodies till you are emancipated. Read Gita again not for a tip or two, but for very knowledge as to who you are, why you are, what are you doing, and what you should be doing. You say: Man has to pay for his own karma in this birth itself that is very much evident. If I negligently drive the car, I am sure to make accidents. I say: It is not at all evident- where is the Q of " very much evident " ? People walking on footpaths can also get hit without being negligent. Read newspapers on a daily basis. You say: Gita warns us to be more responsible and be skillful in our actions or karma. I say: Again wrong ! " Yogah Karmashu kausalam " does not mean that yoga is skillful karmas. It means- In doing Karmas, skill is Yoga (Equanimity) ! Skill is an adjective/ respect given to Equanimity not to karmas. You say: Again like I said I am focusing on Gita messages which are down-to- earth. I say: There is no message of Gita which is not down to earth. You Say: I am not there yet where I have experienced God in every human being and treated them the same way, no I am not there yet. I say: Make that your goal for balance life. Gita, Saints, Scriptures, Satsanga help you there. Believe in them. You have power of belief given to you by God. Utilise that more often than not, particularly on spiritual matters. Else prove to us that you never 'believed' ! You say: At the times Gita was documented, our ancestors do not have as much writing / editing tools that have today. They have documented what has been practiced by many for 100s of years before in a very brief manner. I say: You have not seen the enormity of Scriptures of Sanatan Dharma. Vedas, Puranas, Smritis, Upnishads, Mahabharata, Ramayana, Ramcharitmans, Gita - who says they are brief? You say: God has given man intellect and ......... We need to use that to the fullest extent before seeking help from God... Use intellect and do karmas skillfully, but do not desire the fruits. Desire for fruits causes expectations, microscopic changes in brain. These changes are waiting forces (papas or sins) which will spring up, when the expectations are not met, causing uncontrollable emotions for men. Is that not a rational? I Say: Microscopic changes occur in not only mind but in every element belonging to nature. " To change " is essential characteristics of nature. Microscopic changes do not necessarily result in 'sins' ! Can't they result in virtues? Besides, mind/intellect you have also been given power of discrimination. One should use that also ! What kind of use you can make of those elements which do not remain static even for a fraction of a second ? There is nothing wrong in throwing the mind into a dust bin after you have used it for performance of your duties. Recommended for you, too ! Use 'viveka' more than mind. Former never changes unlike the latter. You say: Your question on rebirth, hut and palace, difference between children of same parents. Hut and palace " how is this connected with a rebirth? If parents are wealthy, children are born in palace. By your statement, you believe that who are born in huts have done (sins), in palace have done virtues (Punya). Do not you see that is just chance but not karma? I say: Yes ! I believe and have reasons to believe that past life virtues/sins (karmas) produce this life births. No I don't see that it is just a chance. If I do believe in what you say I will fall within the ambit of BG 16:8 ! I have support of Sanatan Dharma behind me ! What is the use of reading Gita if we can't distinguish between soul and body? Gita is not some novel or fiction ! You say: If so, how come Gandhi is not born in a hut chooses to live in huts to be close to common man? Obama, born of a poorman, now is US president. Gandhi is great because he made great karmas, not because he was born great!! I say: " Prior " life karmas cause rebirths. You are unnecessarily talking about " present " life karmas. Totally irrelevant. You say: Accidents " since you believe in karma, you asked such question. I say: Don't you believe in karma? Read your preceding paragraph. You say: Same thing with accidents. To answer your questions, when accidents happened more people died when they did not wear safety helmets/ safety belts. I say: Have you never heard of accidental deaths even when safety helmets/seat belts are fully in position. You say: If your statement has to be true, we do not need courts to punish criminals, because every task is governed by past life karma. Sorry about it!! I say: Who said " every task is governed by past life karma " ? Please do not rely too much on your mind. It changes !! We are talking about re birth Dear Sir ! You say: Difference in children of the same parents - it is all due to DNA genetic. I say: What causes that difference, when parents are same ?? Reply ! Chance/luck/karmas ?? Read BG 16:8 and BG 8:19 ! You say: I did not understand your question on Krishna, sorry so I cannot answer the same. I say: I can appreciate why you can not understand and reply. This will have to be understood if not now , then tomorrow or may be say 100 aeons later. We can't run away from it. Better do it in this human birth only. You say: So when I read Gita or other puranas, I cannot switch of my rationale if there are some questions around it. I do not think our ancestors expected that too. I say I believe that our ancestors were wiser and far far better than us and expected many things which are even yet beyond us. There are times when one has to switch off what you call rationale (mind) and simply Believe ! We have to believe! In fact you are all along believing only, but you don't know that you are believing ! That is MAYA !! Over to Brother Mike and Shashikalaji !! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B ------------------------------- -Shree Hari- Dear Audrey, Please ask me to clarify my response, with a direct question, that would help me a lot. Thanks. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike (Keenor). ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING thought this may be of value dinesh Become givers, not takers: Spiritualists Patel, Dinesh -------------------------------- Hari Om I often used to wonder as to why Swamiji wrote a separate article in many books on " Yogah Karmashu Kaushalam " stated in BG 2:50. Then I thought that it is to establish importance of " Equanimity " in practical life. But when I read interpretation of Mr Venu along with his theory of sins and concept of no re-birth , it occurred to me how great 'visionary' (of trends in Kaliyuga) was Swamiji Ramsukhdasji Maharaj. No Mr Venu ! It does not mean - " Cleverness in doing karmas is Yoga " . It means - In doing karma equanimity(yoga) is skill ! Here the term " kaushalam " ( cleverness/skill) is an adjective/respect/ glory (mahimaa) of " equanimity " not of karmas. Chaos in the world will emerge if the interpretation taken by you is held valid. What to say when it is with your theory of incurring sin and no rebirth ! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Jai Hanuman Mr Venu ! Replies to some of your observations, please kindly keep an open mind. These are not criticisms. We are all only sadhaks. You said that Gita is neither directly nor indirectly suggesting us to switch off our brains. Reply is that in fact Gita is both directly and indirectly suggesting us to switch off our brains !! Post a separate Q on this. We shall tell you as to how, Jee ! Belief can be very powerful and must not be underestimated. Can you prove your parents " other than by just belief " ? You don't remember your birth- no body does ! Now how a human being can prove as to who is his father without " believing " based on " personal knowledge " ? No way- I repeat no way !! Be sure, you will not be able to do that - because births/rebirths are always and exclusively subject matter of " belief " only, never never of " acquired knowledge " - PURE MINDLESS BELIEF !! Come on, Jee ! Argue !! Else " accept " !!! On one hand we can't prove this life birth without belief and you are talking about eternal father and eternal scriptures of Sanatan Dharma ?? Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala ---------------------------- Radhey Radhey The interpretation by Mr Venu of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " reminds me of what is stated in BG 18:32. It squarely opposite of what is reality and highly dangerous. " skilled karmas " are not " yoga " - as Mr Venu right from his first message to the last repeating, repeating and repeating. It can not be so. If this view is held true, then a thief who does theft skillfully will be declared to be a YOGI !! This interpretation along with his novel and unique theory of " change in mental metabolism " causing the sins, and mindless insistence upon theory of no re birth etc - may put him on a wrong path- spiritually. The best thing which has happened therefore for him, by Divine Will, is that he has come in touch with this divine, self less, real satsanga site ! He should thank his " prior karmas " for the same and rather than trying to teach should equip himself " mentally " to learn. Swamiji has written an entire chapter on the subject of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " . Here the skilled word has been used to GLORIFY the yoga. It means - Yoga is the skill in karmas. Your karmas become non binding only when YOGA is in them. YOGA means EQUANIMITY. Hence practice of equanimity in doing karma is skill. Nisha Chatterji -------------------- Jai Hanuman So you say, not only say, insist so frequently that " clevery executed karma " is Yoga under Gita 2:50 ! Sins get incurred only when the expectations are not met as some chemical reaction takes place in the brain and that " cleverness " of the execution of karmas is vitiated ! There is no rebirth, therefore no worry for future ! You think that some body does " ghor karma " (evil deed) very cleverly and succeeds in that, then he does not incur any sins? Now think !! Rethink ! Please read Swamiji's messages on Karma Yog / past Gita Talk messages and kindly get back to us with your findings! What Mike Bhaiyya ! It is so simple to be " Yogi " Jee !! Yogi under Holy Gita, Brother ! Dhanya Ho !! Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala ---------------------- Shri Hari The theory advanced by Venuji about incurring of sins, caused by change in mental chemistry is surprising. Almost each of his concepts need a thorough re-orientation. Good that he has reached here somehow. Let this soul get direction. Shyama Chhangani ------------------------ Mr Venu ! It is my feeling that the observations, the logic, the theories advanced in your note have not been influenced by sadhak messages in this forum, such as the discussion on " Vasudeva Sarvam " " Divine is everywhere " . Let us all be open to listening to new ideas and being brief in our own usage of words and experience the divinity in this forum! Regards Khan Jarsingh ------------------------------- My Salutations to all in this forum Interesting, really very very intersting !Will experienced and learned sadhaks clarify in detail as to whether the theories so painstakingly advanced by Mr Venu K. are correct ? I have not so far during my 6/7 month association with this forum come across concepts as such. I am more interested in his theory regarding sins and his interpretation that nicely/skillfully/cleverly executed actions make a person " yogi " under Gita. If that is so, then I think it is very simple to be " yogi " and a lot of humanity gets covered by this definition. Does Gita confirm that when expectations are not met, there are changes in the brain chemistry? Well, yes, it is difficult to establish re birth. I am eagerly looking forward to deliberations. Please also explain what is this " vaadibhi " and " darshibhi " and Gitacharya stated by Mr Venu ? Thanks Luca B --------------------------- Dear Sadhaks > > Amazing and novel theories put forward nu so laboriously 1. Theory of Rebirth 2. Theory reg Poulation increase 3 Yoga under Gita 4. Practicing vis a vis talking about Gita - need for practical living of Gita 5. Theory reg change in brain to initiate sinful conduct 6.. Mind vs Belief . Mike Keenor please clarify your response as it appeared somewhat vague. Thanks, Audrey Rodrigues ------------------------- PRIOR POSTING -Shree Hari- Dear Venu Komanduri, Firstly I will reiterate what I first quoted: Yoga Aphorism Concentration II 39 : When he is fixed in non-receiving he gets the memory of past life. Swami Vivekananda made no bones about, it he said the memory of past life is the first power a yogi obtains. Now you can say all of this is lunacy, that really is fine by me. Lord Krishna told Arjuna about the reality of rebirth/past life. Chapter 2 Even as a man casts off his worn-out clothes And then clothes himself in others which are new So the embodied casts off worn-out bodies And then enters into others which are new. (22) Of that which is born, death is sure, Of that which is dead, birth is sure. Over the unavoidable, Therefore you never should lament. (27) Chapter 4 The Holy Lord said: Many the births that I have passed– Many passed by you, Arjuna. I have full knowledge of them all, While you do not, Scorcher of Foes. (5) Many more examples, I am not sure how one rationalizes this to mean something else. Actually I will tell you something, if you apply fierce logic in your quest, not backing away from your task to be at one with the universal truth, then all your questions will melt away, but hold onto your hat! 'It is by means of their actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives.' With all due respect your water bottle analogy is like comparing, sardines to bananas. Looking at the logic of the water analogy no mater what form or where those molecules go, they remain those molecules. Now the eternal self is not mega water molecules, but the individual eternal soul, that may become part of the whole plain of oneness but remains like a water molecule that one individual, just like the one water molecule now in the ocean is existent for all of existence. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike (Keenor). --------------------------- Dear sadaks, Sri Venu Komandurisays-- Bagavan suggests tattva darsibhi is better and there is NO appeal. !08 upanashids mentions here and there that it (Upanashids) unable to describe GOD. They why strain on tattva vadibhi. By sticking and practicing SAT? Means deataching to objects and emotions, strongly knowing in mind the dear and near can collapse any time, one came alone and goes alone, all things on earth is only visible by Maya, amount of input of attachment is sorrow of same amount later, Maanusha degam Dullabam, just pretend that one is affectionate, attached, caring and perform actions (karmas) only at body level, always in Anniyachitha of Bagavan. Talking about SAT one has abosolutely NO knowledge how IT is. Can just say what imagined or very little known. One does not see Air but can feel. God is very clearly said HE is Apprameyam. Means no pramanam, not object, cannot be seen or felt by any human senses. Then HIS sankalpa to take a form and show us HIS vision. In Srimat Bagavat it is very clear about GOD told by Elephant Gajendra- HE is AKKILA KARANAM, ARPUTHA KARANAM, NISH KARANAM. May be it contradictory but has wonderful message that is said in Bagavath Geetha Transition- Like birds migrating from one place to other. Like changing cloths. In Saffire dress or Pyjama, or suit you are the same person. When Jeva leaves it takes with it it`s own Karmas, Vasanas, Dana & Dharm, Paapa & Puniya etc that was experienced on earth and NOTHING materialistically from earth. In case Jeeva leaves without anything said above, it travels on Archanathi Marg northern side of earth and reaches Paramathuma. Jai Sri Krishna B.Sathyanarayan ----------------------- Venuji, please clarify your perspective. In my eyes there appear to be vaccilation between belief and mind. Thakurlingam ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear sadaks, Once soul leaves the body, it takes nothing of worldly things is the meaning. A crorepathi on death can never carry with him anything, even his body except his own cause and effects (Karmas). Of course many has seen GOD in the past. But we never believed them. We insulted them as " Chitta Brama " . We never knew their Chitta was with Brama. Mother Andal in SriRangam has seen God. Thrirupan Alwar, Nandanar, Kannaper, Samartha Ramadoss, Bradrachalla Ramadoss, Shridi Sai Baba, Ramana Rishi, Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa showed God to Vivekanath. Paramathuma is NOT object has been discussed so many times. HE is to be known through Gyana/Bakthi. In Srimath Bagavath it is said that Bakthi Maatha unable to wake up her 2 children Gyana and Virag as Kali was Born. For a person with poorna faith, he can see God in many. For a person with distrubed & uncertain faith, even if God appears he will start thinking whether it is illusion, just like Duryodan saw Viswaroop. For Valmiki with years of Ram Naam Ant hill covering him, never lost faith. Fraction of faith lost, will show no any results. Though in Bible, the example is nice. Christ was walking on water. A disciple also wanted to walk on water. Christ said come. He walked on water. But as he was waliking on water, a doubt came in his mind , " What if I sink " . He sank. Christ said to disciple, " When you lost faith- faithlessness sank you " . Sri Ragavendar Swamy in his teen age gave food to Sri Krishna Idol which never ate. He profusly cried to extent of fainting, Sri Krishna came and ate. So was in case of Namadev. Mother Yasoda said today I will tie up Krishna. She tried with a rope and it was getting short of 2 Inches. When she surrendered to Sri Krishna saying with love,' Oh Krishna I cannot tie you. Bagavan gave HIS hip to be tied. Bakthi (physical surrender), intellect (Mind surrender), faith (Budhi Surrender) known as Trikarna Sudhi, Bagavan appears in the form you desire. Purpose of this forum is to impart Gyana so that one can see God. Guru (this forum) shows the way, it is up to one to catch up fast with faith. Have faith on a stone, Bagavan appears. Jai Sri Krishna --------------------------- Dear Sadhakom There is a hot response for my posting. Thank you all for giving me an opportunity to explain what I said and try to answer your questions. Before that I want to mention 3 of points here: (a) We all who participated in this posting believe in God, I believe we differ in how we perceive God. I do not see and do not expect you would see this as an anomaly as we are all seeking the same target in different paths (types of yoga). (b) All sadhaks may not be at the same level of sadhana and making spiritual progress at same speed. I may be at basic level and you may be at advanced stages. There is no measure to it. © Please show tolerance / constraint to different view points – when you have 6 billion people, they all could be different. Being in the advanced stages, a sadhak will show more constraint towards others (I do not need to read or quote from Gita for this simple fundamental on human relations) Since our moderator advised brevity, I will try to follow the same, but cannot be sure of the same: I studied Gita (mainly the first 7 chapters repeatedly and others once) and was relating many of the down-to-earth messages of Gitacharya to my own personal life to remove tensions, developing relationship with my fellow citizens around and writing my own observations in a dairy. When I joined this forum, the topics postings suggested to me the sadhaks are in advanced stage of saadhana. As I went through the communication, I was not clear on some statements from the sadhaks connected with postings like `samaadhi / moksha', expressions like `soul leaving body' if they have visualized these states and responding. If I were you I would not venture to answer the posting like on samaadhi vs moksha, without experiencing both the states. So my posting was to get some clarity on the practice / examples own experiences. Mike – I understood your writing then and now the same way, no disagreement with you on it. I only brought an additional point, in support of viewing Gita from different angles. Gita is neither directly nor indirectly suggesting us to switch off our brains. Use our skills and intellect, question our way up so we may progress and make the progress in a best way – is what I meant by `yogah karmasu kousalam', is also stated in Gita again as `muktasanjna karma samaacharh'. On rebirth, let me know how the following contradicts Gita? God is of many forms. For simplicity of understanding, let us say divine (purusha or Lord) form and non-divine form (prakriti – Nature). If I consider divine form as a divine ocean (water), man takes birth as the water enters into a bottle. Water + bottle(B) = man. There could be different men B1, B2, B3 etc.We identify the characteristics of the bottle (the color, the shape) to water also, so we see different men (with different colors and shapes). When death arrives, bottle breaks and water gets back to the ocean. After death, there is no B1, B2 and B3, right? It is all gone back to divine form (to God). In ocean you do cannot trace the water thrown back. There will be births from the ocean, but nothing cannot be called `rebirth'. Sorry I cannot prove it, no way different from that you cannot prove rebirths – other than believing our scriptures. Its 50: 50 chance, right? But see this: If rebirths are to be accepted as the fact (other than just belief), there has be to be 1:1. (I am taking India as an example here) How come the population exploded from 350 million to about 1000 million in about last 35 years and not before? Are we to assume that more living beings are transmuting to human beings now? I am not suggesting the above is truth, but a view point. I am open to criticism here, but be logical in what you say. Man has to pay for his own karma in this birth itself that is very much evident. If I negligently drive the car, I am sure to make accidents. Gita warns us to be more responsible and be skillful in our actions or karma. Again like I said I am focusing on Gita messages which are down-to-earth, I am not there yet where I have experienced God in every human being and treated them the same way, no I am not there yet. Vyasji At the times Gita was documented, our ancestors do not have as much writing / editing tools that have today. They have documented what has been practiced by many for 100s of years before in a very brief manner. That is the reason there are so many written commentaries about same one Gita from different great people later and there could be other reasons also. Different perspectives!! God has given man intellect and an area of independence. Within that area man has the control and beyond it others, society, nature and God. We need to use that to the fullest extent before seeking help from God. This is not `egoism', this is use of the God-gifted assets. Use intellect and do karmas skillfully, but do not desire the fruits. Desire for fruits causes expectations, microscopic changes in brain. These changes are waiting forces (papas or sins) which will spring up, when the expectations are not met, causing uncontrollable emotions for men. Is that not a rational? Is that not what our modern psychology saying? 1000s of years after Gita said the truth!! The more I see the rationality behind Gita messages, the more my admiration grows to Gitacharya. Your question on rebirth, hut and palace, difference between children of same parents. Hut and palace – how is this connected with a rebirth? If parents are wealthy, children are born in palace. By your statement, you believe that who are born in huts have done (sins), in palace have done virtues (Punya). Do not you see that is just chance but not karma? If so, how come Gandhi is not born in a hut chooses to live in huts to be close to common man? Obama, born of a poorman, now is US president. Gandhi is great because he made great karmas, not because he was born great!! Accidents – since you believe in karma, you asked such question. Did you every try blindly running across a heavy traffic of cars? You would not and I would not, because we know it is not safe, nothing to do with past life karma. Same thing with accidents. To answer your questions, when accidents happened more people died when they did not wear safety helmets / safety belts. If your statement has to be true, we do not need courts to punish criminals, because every task is governed by past life karma. Sorry about it!! Difference in children of the same parents - it is all due to DNA – genetic. If you are interested and want to be rational, you can search internet on `DNA', you will get tons of information. I did not understand your question on Krishna, sorry so I cannot answer the same. Critical examination – this word may have pained you and may be others also, I apologize if it did. That's what happens when our beliefs are hurt. I went through this painful experience when I read `Indian Philosophy' by former Indian President S.Radhakrishnan, which talks about how the 6 systems of Indian philosophy have originated, scriptures – Vedas, Upanishads and epics were (and what times) compiled. My beliefs to perceive God in human form (like Vishnu, Shiva etc) was deeply hurt. However, I had go through that pain and overcome that to now have broader belief system. Please do not be under the impression that `critical examination' is going aginst a system or philosophy. Its mindset to probe and ask questions to gather more information about whatever you do /read or study. I am not saying `right' information. Certain things do not sound logical and need deep understanding / reading of other books. Lot of people will be surprised to know that Indian geometry (mathematics) originated from or for `aagama' shastra. (To know more about it type `sulabha sutras' in Google). And now we know that sciences originated and proliferated into many branches from mathematics. So when I read Gita or other puranas, I cannot switch of my rationale if there are some questions around it. I do not think our ancestors expected that too. If so, I am wondering if so many commentaries on Gita or other scriptures are necessary. Shasaikalaji You talked about `luck' and it depends on how define `luck'. Take a minute and try to define the word `luck' or see a dictionary. We use this word in general, whether we believe in it or not, even I use it and I do not believe in it. There is positive way of having `luck' and conventional way of using it. If some one gets lottery or promotion or money, we say `he is lucky'. Is that what you mean? I consider I am lucky when I read a nice poem in `bhagavatam' that God gave me a mind to enjoy to my fullest extent. Can a billionaire enjoy that poem as much as I do if God has not given him that mind (bank balance does not change it). He can buy a top model car/ building, not the mind. He has to use his own, good or bad. Holy Gita, Ramayana or Bharata – God never said follow everything blindly. When it occurs to your brain, even if it is Vedas, Upanishads, please do have question on that, but most obediently, so the beliefs are not hurt. Your questions enrich your belief, like I explained in my note to Vyasji. Energy comes to us when we are open to criticism and same way we lose energy when we react negatively to a criticism. We are human beings with emotions. So being a science student is not that I am a scientist or any big person, the tendency to be inquisitive. Mind and belief – Can you define `mind' for me? Its is difficult, of course, our dictionaries provide definition, you can say it a `collection of thoughts, feelings and emotions'. Your beliefs come out of your `mind' and are an intense emotion. Belief is one you think is right (whether that is right or wrong for society or others). You may derive the knowledge your belief from books, parents, society and they are likely to change naturally or by force. I believe that `Vaada' is very important aspect of learning and being open about `vaada' is equally important too, I would encourage you to read the chronology of Indian scriptures, so we will have a better perspective of how much our ancestors struggled to store their wisdom for us, how they transmitted the same through generations. Sorry I took lot of your time/space, Moderatorji!!! Venu Komanduri SUMMARY OF SADHAK RESPONSES Ram Ram - No scripture recommends only tattva-vada (reading/discussing only) - Interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! - Sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal. It addresses principles and practice of ideal human conduct. All issues can be addressed. - As clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner, clarity increases - " tattva darshibhih " remain only SAT (Existence) - " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16) - Sadhak is to be tattva darsibhi (by living/practicing 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). - It is no about simply waiting for God to do. - It is by means of sadhak's actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. - The great souls, these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. - Surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan and all vasanas will be eradicated - Bhagwan will reveal himself to his children and bring his children together in the way they resort to Him. - Have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for yourr life (lessons from other pilgrims) - Implementing Gita teachings - KEY to betterment - Practices Gita in one's life probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion - Yes! one has to " live " Gita principles. There is no doubt, No contradiction. - Without cause-effect (rebirth), what causes such inequanimity in births, situations, circumstances etc.? - Critical Examination of Gita/God, is it possible? - Paramatma is not easily conquerable by our critical thinking etc. - Aren't Mind / Belief opposite / separate subjects altogether? - No need to believe in theories, believe your own experience - God and His creation are all one - WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life. KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFEBELT - GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. - THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth. Ram Ram ---------------------------- NEW POSTING -Shree Hari- Dear Venu Komanduri, Thanks for your comments on my post. I like to mention to you at first, that I have spent my whole life in the field of electronics, logic was one of my favorite subjects. There came a time in my life when logic, and common sense were confounded. (You will have to take my word on that, there will be hundreds of sadhaks who will understand what I am saying). Actually I was putting the opposite spin on the common view, that is practicing intuitively, maybe from the inner conscience a way of life, searching all avenues for answer to the paradoxes of existence. One must remember, there are many great souls in the world who have never heard of the Bhagavad Gita, and when they come across it they are amazed. Analize carefully what I wrote: 'It is by means of their actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives.' I really do not think I implied one should await for GOD, if it appeared that way I apologize. B.G. 11: Prostrating in adoration, do I crave Forgiveness: as a father forgives his son, A friend his dear friend, and a lover his love†" Thus even so should You forgive Me, O God. (44 Overjoyed am I, seeing Your form, and yet My mind is distracted with terror. Show me, In mercy Lord, only Your previous form†" O Lord of gods, Abode of the universe. (45 Purely out of interest what do you make of that from a logical approach. You ask about transition, it can come slowly a gently path, or fierce and fast, like fire. But whatever, " You keep chopping wood, and fetching water " . B.G. 2: Attached to pleasure and power Their minds are drawn away by this Speech, and to them is not granted The insight from meditation. (44) The introspective ones I talk of, ponder meditate, these 'Pilgrims', prefer a quiet life, you know scientists, technocrats, woodchoppers, whatever, but they do not seek glory. To quote you: 'I do not trust in rebirth, saying that 'people suffer from the karma of previous births' Talking of Yogis, or Yogis to be: Yoga Aphorism: Concentration II: (39). When he is fixed in none receiving, he gets the memory of past life. B.G. 18 And even that man who hears this, Full of faith and free from scoffing, He, liberated, shall attain The happy worlds of the righteous. (71) Has this been heard, O Pritha’s son, By you with a one-pointed mind? Moreover, has the delusion Of your ignorance been destroyed? (72) Arjuna said: Yea, destroyed is my delusion, And I have gained my memory Through Your grace, and my doubts are gone. I am firm; I will do Your word. (73) I hope my friend I have answers some of your questions, I can only tell you the truth as I see it. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ---------------------------- Hari Om Dear Mr Venu It is great to note that your kind self respects Gita except some portions of it. I have few questions. Kindly oblige by replying to the same. Please use your rational/logical mind and sharp intellect while responding so that we may reap maximum benefits. What is that " cleverness " which you referred while giving your version of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " ? Since you don't believe in rebirth, hence by your logical and rational sharp mind/intellect/ego please enlighten us as to how one child gets born in a hut and another in a palace? Is it pure coincidence or there are some laws behind the same? Why one should abstain from evil conduct? Why not, at least when one is sure of death, one should reap maximum pleasure from the world , by whatever means, as there will no rebirth to pay for_ Since there are no sins/virtues accumulating? What/Who leaves a live body so as to make it a corpse? How come 2 children of same parents have differences, inspite of living in same environment? How come in an accident one survives while another does not? Your more learned views are also solicited on that " karma kanda/swarga bhog " verses of Gitaji referred by you. What according to you may be the reasons of Lord Krishna advising us not to fall prey to the enticement of Karma Kand of Vedas? You said Sir that Krishna lives in all beings. Can you enlighten us as to why and for what time and since when? " Critical examination of Gita " - what according to you makes that necessary? Who is qualified to conduct that examination? What should be the basis of such exercise? How it should be conducted- any yardsticks in your logical/rationale mind ? Your elaborate views are solicited for benefit of us all. Most of the Sadhaks in this forum , including me, have more belief than logic/rationale. Your association and contribution therefore should enrich us. May be in the end you also walk out richer too. I trust you will respond " positively " . Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Jai Hanuman Venuji Maharaj ! I noted your kind advice to our Brother Mike Keenor . I quote below the last para - Kindly elaborate as to what is this " belief " ? Being a science student yourself and luckily ( " luckily " -since you don't believe in rebirth etc-or you don't believe in " luck " also ?) you also have mind and sharp intellect. Naturally , therefore, you critically evaluate everything before any acceptance- even if that is Holy Gita. Then what is this animal called " belief " which you referred in your elaborate advice to Mike Bhaiyya? Where then, Jee, is space for " belief " in your critical/sharp/logical/rational/thinking/evaluating/analytical/energe tic as well as energy producing/imaginative mind and intellect? Are not mind and belief two different and opposite subjects altogether? Like North Pole and South Pole? Bolo Jee! Boliye Sir !! Waiting for a positive response, Jee. Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram What " rationale " what " critical exam " We think, God is that easily conquerable by us? by our rationale and critical examination? Until one realizes the a speck on nothingness that we are compared to God ...then and then only true knowledge will reveal itself (rather we will allow it to flow into us) . We are like that upside down bowl, when it is raining. Swamiji has given this example... that the rain is pouring equallly on all. What can God do if we chose to keep our bowl, upside down? He is equally accessible to all. No one is forcing one to believe. Let us believe in our own experience. All our lives we have been learning only from " cause and effect " no other reason. We avoid fire, because sometime or the other we felt the heat and knew it to be dangerous. We learn from our mistakes, because there is a consequence. There is a price to be paid. We don't need to believe in theories as Swamiji says, just believe in our own experiences(anubhav). Ram Ram ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om. Hinduism never never compels one to read Gita at any point of one's life. There may be crores of hindus pass by their birth without even looking at HOLY GITA. Krushna has never uttered a word that everyone should surely read GIta. Krushna has given us Gita not to just read it and please HIM!!!!!!! He has taken pity on each and everyone of us!!!! We really dont understand the birth cycle at all !!!!! TO Krushna is attached the Vishnu Maya and Krushna is OMNI PRESENT in PRACRUTHI (Nature) !!!! WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life !!!! We keep facing cyclone after cyclone and we get lost in this action of pracruthi (Nature) !!!! Some start losing faith in God as they are shaken as disaster after disaster ruin their life !!!! This continues till we surrender to Krushna and take Gita in our hand. Here comes a great change in our life as KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFE BELT ---GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. He explains in detail the dimensions of nature-pracruthi, what our body is made of, what our mind does, what our intellect does, what is SATH CHITH. He has taken great care to educate us on Sthira Bhuddhi, Ignorance and true knowledge. THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth !!!!! So interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! With regards, Usha Sridhar. ---------------------------- Hari Om Dear Sadhak Venu ! What is your question? I wonder if any sadhak contradicted what you mean to say ! Yes- one has to " live " Gita principles. How and where there is doubt on the same? Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B ---------------------------- Re:Tatwa vaadibhi to tatva darsibhi Venu Komanduri is absolutely right: the ultimate aim is tatva darsibhi, though tatva darsibhi may be the initial step towards that. If an individual gets too attached to discussions and interpretation on Gita, the focus on practice to become tatva darsibhi may be lost. And, when one practices Gita in one's life it is probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion on Gita. I am sure God will help and direct you along the path. If you have learnt that God and His creation are all one, realize that by living your life on that principle even as you have to act as a person distict from others. Difficult. But I try this path hoping that one day God will ensure successful transition to Oneness. Basudeb Sen ---------------------------- Dear Sadhak Community There is a nice response from Mike Keenor, nice in the sense there is outpouring positivism. I approached Gita in many ways - scientific, athiestic and spiritual. From all the angles I see there is immense wisdom stored in Gita. Ever since I have been studying Gita, specially the last 2 years, I am amazed at the down to earth messages. So I remain on earth and talk about the practical messages clearly indicated, they are neither hidden nor hinted, in Gita. Being a science student and in engineering profession, I always question things / dictum before my mind sees the rationale behind them - be it Vedas / Gita or otherwise. There are many slokas in Gita that showers the life management principles even if I study them as an athiest - ignore the fruits of desires (twaktaphalam), live in the 9-holed town (navadwarava pure dehi). Only to say 'critical examination of any scripture' is utmost necessary, I quote from Gita ( 2:42, 2:43, 2:44 ) which suggested not get trapped by the 'karma kanda' /'swargabhoga' (the rituals and the pleasures of the heaven) in the early part of Vedas. That is being rational about the objective of Gita. Despite my strong faith and belief in Gita, I do not trust in rebirth, saying that 'people suffer from the karma of previous births', 'concept of sin / virtue' as account maintained by God or some power. No! I do not!! There can be many interpretations to those words / usages in Gita. Remember that though Gita was documented in 2nd century AD, the slokas were known even before 1500 BC. We are 3500 years from the source and its meaning. Mike - I like your positivism, but Gita is also suggesting 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - meaning there is controllable part the sadhak has to do (not waiting for God's hand), wherever he cannot, he should seek help from others (remember God lives in all). For all this sport of activities, the energy comes from the positivism / belief / imagination /critical thinking /relating the messages to the practical difficulties of life. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram The KARMA issue will be addressed as a separate topic. Kindly stay with one topic and subject at hand. Gita Talk Moderators, Ram Ram ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear Venu Komanduri, B.G. 4 In whatever way they resort To Me do I thus reward them. It is My path which ev'rywhere All men follow, O Arjuna. (11). People the world over from many different faiths, or even non faiths, who started their journey so very long ago, who hear as it were the ringing of the sacred bells, and have a yearning in their hearts for the unknown Beloved, they feel that Love, they know it is there. Do you not think that Divine Krishna would not take his children by the hand and show them the way home, 'The last miles'. It is by means of their actions by their morality and there love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. Do you think HE would not bring his children together so they may find comfort, be supported and support others in Divine Forum. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ----------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Wonderful dear Venu. In other words, you are telling us all to shut up! Yes that is very much required for any serious seeker. You are very right … no scripture recommends tattva-vada. Definitely, tattva-vada can be a potential plague … most often, it is better to be ignorant rather than being a tattava-vadin: Andhantamah pravishanti ye avidyaamupaasate | Tato bhuya iva te tamo ye u vidyaayaam rataah || But, … is there any other way toward becoming a tattva-darshin? Manasaivedamaaptavyam neha naanaasti kinchana || We have to retrace the same path in which we collected our garbage (ignorance and inertia) to remove the same – our minds and bodies. You know, the vaccine is in the very germ! We have to turn the same germ against itself to releive ourselves from our deseases. We are helpless but to indulge in this vada (fight with our own bodily and mental demands) to remove the ignorance and inertia harbored within. The darshana (attainment of peace) is an eventuality of the vada (the war within). No war … no peace! No war within is a suicide in other words … Tangste pretyaabhigacchhanti ye kechaatmahano janaah || One who persihes without fighting the ignorance and inertia harbored within is the worst of all suicides. Therefore, a true vada (a truthful fight against one's own ignorance and inertia - you may want to call the vaccine, Tattva Vimarsha) is very essential to attain The Peace (Tattva Darshana) … after all a war is a war … things can go wrong … but it is definitely better than a suicide … definitely better than being consumed by our own tendencies as time passes over rendering no resistance like a pashu … Off course, the vada has the most vicious side effect that it itself can become the biggest vasana … well, as far as one is cognizant of the vada and its vicuous side effects, it is good and … that is the only way. The clouds of our ignorance and inertia become thinner and thinner as our truthfulness in our Tattva Vada intensifies in our internal search for the truth (Vada should be pitched against one's own well- established stupidity NOT ON THE STUPIDITY WISHFULLY PERCEIVED IN OTHERS!). Clarity of the truth (Tattva darshana) naturally increases as the clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner and thinner … it is an eventuality that we look forward to so that we can finally perform your wonderful suggestion – SHUT UP! Till then … let us poor things perform the ritual waging the war within. Once in a while, please keep peeping in to remind us that we really wage it only for the correct reason (to burn the ignorance within) and only on the correct targets (to uproot the inertia within). That is helpful. THANK YOU. Respects. Naga Narayana ------------------------------- Dear sadaks, Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' This is what Bagavan said to Arjuna. Bagavan said, " What is use of knowing all knowledge when I (bagavan) is right in front of you " . Means do not worry of Sadanas, Karmas, Scripts, knowledge on Sat etc when the SAT (bagavan) has comes. That is surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan who will take care of all the good what knowledge could give and also eradicate all vasanas, Karmas by HIS sankalpa itself. We have been trying over several births and still landing here. But if Bagavan tries you, the there is no any obstacle to liberate. But if Bagavan wants to try one, then he must have Niskama Prema Bakthi, which Bagavan has said in Geetha. Jai Sri Krishna baiya sathyanarayan =========================================== Happy new year 2009 to all sadhaks Thanks for your co-operation and guide regarding Gita 2.16 pawan singhal -------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The Q of Venuji had two facets. One re the object of this Satsanga Forum. While I am not in any way a Founder of this Forum but as I see there is a common thread binding all Sadhaks - Swamiji Shri Ramsukhdasji Maharaj and Holy Gita. The sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal- beyond all faiths and religions- covering humanity at large. This forum is in my view at present " evolving " and the deliberations are getting divine and divine. We , in fact, can easily state that we are part of a Jnana Yagya within the meaning of Holy Gita. Hence I don't see any limitations on the scope of this forum. Since Holy Gita encompasses entire humanity , both principles and practice of ideal human conduct - I see nothing wrong in our addressing any type of problems faced by Sadhaks in their spiritual journey. All my personal views as one of the many Sadhaks of this divine group. Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Dear all , Yes , if we can implement the teachings of gita , in our day to day living , not only will it make life Less stressful , but more meaningful . After all we live in our communities and mingle / work / interact, so i Feel as long as we understand The true meaning (spirit of the message ) of the message sought to be Conveyed by the gita and try & Impact the same in our lives , things will be much better . In short ,what we want to be is better human beings , because only than can we be better Parents / children / friends / spouses /sadhaks / teachers/ Rgds Arvind Malhotra ---------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The very existence is " SAT " . Those who have experienced the characteristics of " SAT " and ever changing function of nature- " ASAT " , they in practice experience " their obvious , self proven, natural, automatic positioning in the existence viz SAT . In their experience there is nothing known as ASAT existing. In other words in their experience only SAT is existing- nothing else is existing. Such great people are called " tattva darshibhih " . In their experience only their positioning in SAT- imperishable, permanent, ever present existence- remains. Through that positioning they get highest rewards. In BG 2:16- the term " ubhayorapi " - represents " conscience " ! " Antah " - represents " element knowledge " !! " Drishtah " - represents " experience " !!! Meaning thereby that " conscience has transformed ( " transition " term as used by the questioner) in to the experiential knowledge and now what has remained is SAT - existence only! This is the highest state of Jnana Yoga!! The Highest reward! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16). Swamiji has been very clear about this... " Real " (Sat) is our natural state. Natural is what needs no effort. It is ever attained. It simply IS. Be situate in it. The essence (Real) is always there - will always be there. The real is not created. The unreal is created from the Real, stays in the real and then merges in the real. It has no existence of its own. One has to simply give importance to ones own experience. No need to believe in the scriptures. Your existence always IS. What is NOT can never exist. The IS always remains IS. To experience 'I AM', no effort is required. No practice. There is no doubt of our existence. The real essence is our existence. The base, the foundation of all appearance - of all creation. That is Paramatma (Supreme Consciousness,God). Meera Das Ram Ram ---------------------------- This is the sanest stuff I heard in a while! Hare Krishna! Gurunath Prakash ---------------------------- GITA TALK GROUP GUIDELINES: 1. Purpose of the group is to help Sadhakas clarify their doubts related to Gitaji shalokas. Therefore, responses which further clarify the understanding of Gitaji, will only be posted. 2. Wherever possible, please quote Gitaji or other scriptures to substantiate your response. 3. Kindly limit personal feelings, opinions, beliefs etc. to the extent that they further help in understanding the Gita shlokas 4. Please be as concise and to the point as possible, respecting sadhaka's time. 5. Kindly focus your writing to the subject at hand only. 6. Please do not include links to the other sites or other organizations. 7. Kindly do not include your personal information such as phone number, address etc. 8. Please do not address the response to a particular individual since the message is going to the entire group. 9. Due to the large readership, all responses may not be posted. 10. Moderator at his discretion, may modify the posting, if content is unclear or not appropriate for distribution to the group. 11. Please respond taking into consideration the novices, youth, westerners, non-sectarian audience. Kindly limit the use to Sanskrit words only, rather provide the English word with Sanskrit bracketed wherever possible. MODERATOR Ram Ram ------------------------ Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 11, 2009 Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 FOLLOW-UP ISSUE Gita also says - 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - not waiting for God's hand. ---------------------------- NEW POSTING Hari Om Thank you Venuji for being brief and focussed. However, please address our basic query : What is that cleverness/skill about which you again talked in this posting also ? If it is equanimity as pointed out to you then drop forever your notion that there is any need for " acquisition " of any thing by effort in order to comply with BG 2:50. You are " equanimous " by your very nature ! Note again that 2:49 defines " yoga " and 2:50 IS NOT DEFINITION OF YOGA but " mahima " (glory) of Yoga (equanimity). Don't link equanimity with practice or skill to be acquired or efforts. Practice and skills are needed for karmas. Equanimity itself is skill. No karmas are needed to acquire the same. Otherwise, explain to us what needs to be acquired and how ? What are the skills referred by you? In any case, explain as to what is " attachment " referred in your last posting? Understand the difference between " acquiring " and " applying " ! We have to " apply " equanimity into our karmas not " acquire " it by our karmas. Now state what kind of " rationality " you were referring in your opening statements of your last posting? Don't say please: Sadhak Brethrens " mistook " you. Say: either You are now clear or not yet clear. Yes or no. Conclude, don't keep a subject open !! While addressing your theory/observations reg Law of Karma (essentially Law of cause and effect) please address specific queries of Sadhanaji, Shashikalaji and our young sadhak Varunji, as well as others including me. Take a day more, jot down in a systematic and scientific manner all the Qs/responses to you by various sadhaks and address them. May be while addressing them itself you get clearer. As Brother Mike stated very rightly : Keep your hat on ! Stick to your task of finding out universal truth and watch in an " equanimous " manner as to how your theories, questions melt away. Try your level best however to justify them. Once understood " accept " ! Nothing wrong in that. Say bravely so ! You are among sadhaks, none of whom as Sadhanaji pointed out are " ponga pandits " . None wants to criticise other. Our Chairman Rajaji does not like very lengthy descriptions and rightly so, therefore let us be concise and precise. Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B ------------------------------ Dear Sadhakom As Sadhnaji mentioned, yes the divine energy can go into another bottle. I am not refuting the rebirth theory as much as any one can prove it too. I just do not believe, see the population explosion I indicated in my post below. It suggests me the view point of the bottle, please do not call it as a thoery - it has no breadth and depth, nor do I have the knowledge to create one. To answer your question, 'how the divine energy went into the bottle', please consider same it went in the same as the Hindu rebirth - in stead of bottle to bottle, it is ocean to bottle. Yogah Karmas Kausalam - 'by God's will' - Its absolutely true. I am not talking about the ego here. There is a lot in the world that man can do without attachment and with what HE gave us (so it is always by his 'gifted / given' will). In this domain, we will be better positioned to use 'cause and effect' theory, not 'Law of Karma'. [There is macroscopic world and the microscopic world which we directly cannot visualize and which are maintained with great orderliness again because of HIS grace]. Regards Venu Komanduri ------------------------------- Radhey Radhey Venuji has a lot of questions to answer. Yes! as Sadhanaji says - none of us are ponga pandits. Coming to the subject of Gitaji 2:50 let me state that Swamiji has categorically emphasised that " equanimity " is there in every human being as God is there in every human being. God is equanimous , isnt it? There is no market where it is being sold. You already have it. Proof ? With respect to entire universe, people and things, with the exception and only exception of what you call me or mine or my likings or dislikings - you and me are even today equanimous only.. I wonder what kind of rationality or efforts or karmas or use of mind or intellect is being advocated to acquire the thing which is already with us? Radhey Radhey Nisha Chatterji ----------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear Sadaks, One Sadak said, " Gita also says - 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - not waiting for God's hand. " Excellent very short explanation. But can we take the line instead of " not waiting for God`s hand " ---AS--- " performing things (Actions) as per God` s will. Jai Sri Krishna B.Sathyanarayan ---------------------------- Dear Sadhak, It is not necessary that a learned person is realized or a realized one is learned. But for sure a realized know all the answers, as they are hidden deep in SELF. We all sadhak/sadhika in this forum are practicing the " Sat " as much as God wants us to. So those who have seen the Truth are also sincerely practicing IT.I have no doubt about that. No ponga pandits here. Now in yr words- (By practical life, I mean one living the normal life while in the quest for God, Gita does not shun the karma, but the attachment towards it) I always quote monkey's story who grabs peas in the fist and wants to take his hand out of the container, but he cannot. To take his hand out of the container he must drop the peas. We want to live a " practical normal life while in quest for God " this very desire to live a normal life is a hindrance to reach God. If someone sincerely wants to reach God, he/she must drop all desires...How can one reach God while holding Sansar tightly ? Now to yr theories about rebirths and yoga. Could you please tell us how the water went into the bottle ? Surely if water goes back to ocean, there is no rebirth, but what if the water keeps on changing bottles? (the same desire which brings water into the bottle will multiply and force water to change different bottles unless it rerealizests true nature and uselessness of bottles) My dear, you have longing for Truth but you are trying to reach it through yr mind. Drop yr mind, drop yr thinking and surrender to Lord Krishna, He will unfold the Truth for you...Believe me it is not difficult. When you will face the Truth, you will laugh and cry at the same time. Trust Lord Krishna, believe in His words, follow His words.... Instead of reading many puranas, just read Gitaji and explanation given by Swamiji.Go deep within,cry for Him, Light will be there. Nasto vidhyate bhavo, nabhavo vidhyate sat..Gitaji Our mind(thought) is the only hindrance in seeing the Truth. Go in deep silence, meditate and attend the thoughtless stage, and you will see the Truth!!! Because only " Sat " Exist... with Love, a sadhika Sadhna Karigar ----------------------------- Rebirth The body made up of bones, flesh, blood etc. is known as the gross body. Inside this gross body is subtle body. This subtle body comprise of 17 elements. They are five senses of knowledge (ears, nose, eyes, tongue and skin), five senses of performing actions (hands, feet, mouth, genital organ and anus), five life-breath (pran, apan, saman, vyan and udan), mind and intellect. These 17 elements constitute the subtle body. Inside this subtle body is causal body which is also known as ignorance-body (agyanmay-kosh) and nature (swabhav). Action holds prominence in gross body, thinking holds prominence in subtle body and positioning holds prominence in causal body. Wake- state is an affair of gross body, dream-state is an affair of subtle body and deep-sleep state (when we don't remember anything) is an affair of causal body. Senses, mind and intellect i.e. subtle body resides in life-breath. At the time of death, this life-breath assembles in heart. When the last breath is exhaled this subtle body (with causal body inside) departs from any of the nine gates of the gross body. This departure of subtle body from gross body is only known as death. Jeeva's next body is determined by last thought. Lord says " Arjun, thinking of whatever entity one leaves the body at the time of death, that and that alone one attains, being ever absorbed in that thought " (Gita 8.6) This subtle body then lives in space. In whichever womb the jeeva has to take next birth it will first go in that male body either through breath or any food particle. He will then make way in female body through sexual intercourse. In one drop of man's semen there are lakhs of jeevas (sperm cells). Out of this only that jeeva which has strong karma relationship and is destined to take birth will find place in female's womb. Rest other jeevas will die. In due course that sperm cell will grow limbs, hands, mouth etc. Then after stipulated time it will come out of womb. This whole process is known as rebirth. It is the subtle body which comes and goes. Lord says " Even as the wind wafts scents from their seat, so, too, the Jivatma, which is the controller of the body etc., taking the mind and senses from the body, which it leaves behind, forthwith migrates to the body which it acquires. " (Gita 15.8) Soul does not come and go anywhere. That thing which comes and goes anywhere is bound by time and space. That thing which is bound by time and space, it can never be imperishable. But soul is imperishable. For the soul, Lord says " Know that alone to be imperishable which pervades this universe " (Gita 2.17) That imperishable element which pervades this universe how can it go from one body to another. No way. Wherever in Gita and other Hindu scriptures it is said that the soul leaves the body etc. it should be taken for the subtle body. Some FAQ 1. When the subtle body departs from gross body why is it not visible? A. It is not visible because it is not a subject of eyes. One sense cannot even perform the same functioning of another sense i.e. smelling, touching, tasting etc. cannot be done by eyes. Subtle body is beyond senses so it cannot be seen, heard, touched etc. 2. The organs like tongue, eyes etc. of the gross body, do these elements belong to subtle body? A. No. Tongue, eyes, hands, mouth etc. are parts of the gross body. The power to hear, touch, see, taste and smell forms the five senses of knowledge of subtle body. Similarly the power to walk, eat and speak, give and take, urinate and passing feces forms the five senses of action of subtle body. All these powers are in life-breath and it appears in respective parts of the body. For example, the power of seeing comes to eyes etc. 3. Where are the five pran located? A. Pran, Apan, Saman, Udan and Vyan respectively reside in heart, anus, navel, throat and entire body. If anyone has knowledge of what today's science has said about the 17 elements of the subtle body, please share with the whole group. Hare Krishna Varun P. Paprunia ----------------------------- Priy Sadhaks I think we shouldnt involve in I say u say. rather we must understand & experience wat geetaji says. Gyata-Gyan-Gyeya drista-darshan-drishya When all three churn upto only one ur Q will be solved. Its ASHABD PAD. ANUBHAVGAMYA. Thanx Raja Gurdasani ---------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram Rajaji or anyone, If possible would appreciate the english meanings. From Gita Talk Moderators ---------------------- Dear Sadhakom Gita has defined yoga in few places. Let us just take one subject at a time. I used (2:50) 'yogah karmasu kausalam' to refer to rationality. Yes, there is already reference of yoga in 2:48 'Yogastah kuru karmani sangam tvatka dhanajnjaya, sidhya asidhyo samobhutva, samatvam yoga uchyate' meaning 'the eqanimity in doing karma'. Here Gitacharya is advising the sadhak to acquire the skill to the karma wthout attchment and with equanimity. Sadhak would need these acquire this qualilites of attachment and equanimity by practice and once one acquire them the sadhak will be in a position 'yogastha' to do them. Here my brethren mistook me that 'acquiring any skill is yogah'. This sloka is down to earth in that whether a person believes in God or not, he attains the results if he acquires this skill. Will talk about law of karma / rebirth as a separate topic. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Shree Hari- Dear Moderator, My hands have been tied, and thus it must remain, for the good of myself and others. I have always inferred that absolute desire for the Truth, and the primordial cry to GOD, has awesome power, and will be answered. What I have pasted below is a mute response to Sister Shashikalaji's question to me, an answer in silence. This is what I wrote when dealing with more than I thought possible. but GOD gives only what you can take, I wrote it about ten or eleven years ago.(I knew nothing of Jeeva, and the wisdom of Sanatana Dharma, at that time). That Is Me If my soul is racked in pain, and every fiber of being cries out in remorse of past deeds. It's just me. And my body goes numb with fear, with screaming voices hunting me, with anger and indignation rising within. That's me. Falling to the ground, my heart broken in disbelief and awful horror, deep mourning for a lost beloved. Simply me. Laying in sad loneliness of passing life, passing through the void of death to new life and the joy of birth. Again is me. Watching in horror at mans insanity, turning the cross of joy and hope into a symbol of greatest darkness. That's me. Feeling the joy and bliss of the angels embrace, and the breathtaking divine love of God. Yes that's me. MK With Respect and Divine Love, Mike (Keenor) ---------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram What Mike has written, is a clear indication that just like the law of gravity existed even before Newton's discovery, similarly Sanatana Dharma existed even before it's discovery. From Gita Talk Moderators, Ram Ram ----------------------------- Hari Om Venuji ! You have skipped many of questions raised by me. You said: When death arrives, bottle breaks and water gets back to the ocean. After death, there is no B1, B2 and B3, right? I say: Wrong ! Absolutely wrong !! You don't go back to ocean till you are liberated. Death is just change of cloths- you keep travelling in various bodies till you are emancipated. Read Gita again not for a tip or two, but for very knowledge as to who you are, why you are, what are you doing, and what you should be doing. You say: Man has to pay for his own karma in this birth itself that is very much evident. If I negligently drive the car, I am sure to make accidents. I say: It is not at all evident- where is the Q of " very much evident " ? People walking on footpaths can also get hit without being negligent. Read newspapers on a daily basis. You say: Gita warns us to be more responsible and be skillful in our actions or karma. I say: Again wrong ! " Yogah Karmashu kausalam " does not mean that yoga is skillful karmas. It means- In doing Karmas, skill is Yoga (Equanimity) ! Skill is an adjective/ respect given to Equanimity not to karmas. You say: Again like I said I am focusing on Gita messages which are down-to- earth. I say: There is no message of Gita which is not down to earth. You Say: I am not there yet where I have experienced God in every human being and treated them the same way, no I am not there yet. I say: Make that your goal for balance life. Gita, Saints, Scriptures, Satsanga help you there. Believe in them. You have power of belief given to you by God. Utilise that more often than not, particularly on spiritual matters. Else prove to us that you never 'believed' ! You say: At the times Gita was documented, our ancestors do not have as much writing / editing tools that have today. They have documented what has been practiced by many for 100s of years before in a very brief manner. I say: You have not seen the enormity of Scriptures of Sanatan Dharma. Vedas, Puranas, Smritis, Upnishads, Mahabharata, Ramayana, Ramcharitmans, Gita - who says they are brief? You say: God has given man intellect and ......... We need to use that to the fullest extent before seeking help from God... Use intellect and do karmas skillfully, but do not desire the fruits. Desire for fruits causes expectations, microscopic changes in brain. These changes are waiting forces (papas or sins) which will spring up, when the expectations are not met, causing uncontrollable emotions for men. Is that not a rational? I Say: Microscopic changes occur in not only mind but in every element belonging to nature. " To change " is essential characteristics of nature. Microscopic changes do not necessarily result in 'sins' ! Can't they result in virtues? Besides, mind/intellect you have also been given power of discrimination. One should use that also ! What kind of use you can make of those elements which do not remain static even for a fraction of a second ? There is nothing wrong in throwing the mind into a dust bin after you have used it for performance of your duties. Recommended for you, too ! Use 'viveka' more than mind. Former never changes unlike the latter. You say: Your question on rebirth, hut and palace, difference between children of same parents. Hut and palace " how is this connected with a rebirth? If parents are wealthy, children are born in palace. By your statement, you believe that who are born in huts have done (sins), in palace have done virtues (Punya). Do not you see that is just chance but not karma? I say: Yes ! I believe and have reasons to believe that past life virtues/sins (karmas) produce this life births. No I don't see that it is just a chance. If I do believe in what you say I will fall within the ambit of BG 16:8 ! I have support of Sanatan Dharma behind me ! What is the use of reading Gita if we can't distinguish between soul and body? Gita is not some novel or fiction ! You say: If so, how come Gandhi is not born in a hut chooses to live in huts to be close to common man? Obama, born of a poorman, now is US president. Gandhi is great because he made great karmas, not because he was born great!! I say: " Prior " life karmas cause rebirths. You are unnecessarily talking about " present " life karmas. Totally irrelevant. You say: Accidents " since you believe in karma, you asked such question. I say: Don't you believe in karma? Read your preceding paragraph. You say: Same thing with accidents. To answer your questions, when accidents happened more people died when they did not wear safety helmets/ safety belts. I say: Have you never heard of accidental deaths even when safety helmets/seat belts are fully in position. You say: If your statement has to be true, we do not need courts to punish criminals, because every task is governed by past life karma. Sorry about it!! I say: Who said " every task is governed by past life karma " ? Please do not rely too much on your mind. It changes !! We are talking about re birth Dear Sir ! You say: Difference in children of the same parents - it is all due to DNA genetic. I say: What causes that difference, when parents are same ?? Reply ! Chance/luck/karmas ?? Read BG 16:8 and BG 8:19 ! You say: I did not understand your question on Krishna, sorry so I cannot answer the same. I say: I can appreciate why you can not understand and reply. This will have to be understood if not now , then tomorrow or may be say 100 aeons later. We can't run away from it. Better do it in this human birth only. You say: So when I read Gita or other puranas, I cannot switch of my rationale if there are some questions around it. I do not think our ancestors expected that too. I say I believe that our ancestors were wiser and far far better than us and expected many things which are even yet beyond us. There are times when one has to switch off what you call rationale (mind) and simply Believe ! We have to believe! In fact you are all along believing only, but you don't know that you are believing ! That is MAYA !! Over to Brother Mike and Shashikalaji !! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B ------------------------------- -Shree Hari- Dear Audrey, Please ask me to clarify my response, with a direct question, that would help me a lot. Thanks. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike (Keenor). ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING thought this may be of value dinesh Become givers, not takers: Spiritualists Patel, Dinesh -------------------------------- Hari Om I often used to wonder as to why Swamiji wrote a separate article in many books on " Yogah Karmashu Kaushalam " stated in BG 2:50. Then I thought that it is to establish importance of " Equanimity " in practical life. But when I read interpretation of Mr Venu along with his theory of sins and concept of no re-birth , it occurred to me how great 'visionary' (of trends in Kaliyuga) was Swamiji Ramsukhdasji Maharaj. No Mr Venu ! It does not mean - " Cleverness in doing karmas is Yoga " . It means - In doing karma equanimity(yoga) is skill ! Here the term " kaushalam " ( cleverness/skill) is an adjective/respect/ glory (mahimaa) of " equanimity " not of karmas. Chaos in the world will emerge if the interpretation taken by you is held valid. What to say when it is with your theory of incurring sin and no rebirth ! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Jai Hanuman Mr Venu ! Replies to some of your observations, please kindly keep an open mind. These are not criticisms. We are all only sadhaks. You said that Gita is neither directly nor indirectly suggesting us to switch off our brains. Reply is that in fact Gita is both directly and indirectly suggesting us to switch off our brains !! Post a separate Q on this. We shall tell you as to how, Jee ! Belief can be very powerful and must not be underestimated. Can you prove your parents " other than by just belief " ? You don't remember your birth- no body does ! Now how a human being can prove as to who is his father without " believing " based on " personal knowledge " ? No way- I repeat no way !! Be sure, you will not be able to do that - because births/rebirths are always and exclusively subject matter of " belief " only, never never of " acquired knowledge " - PURE MINDLESS BELIEF !! Come on, Jee ! Argue !! Else " accept " !!! On one hand we can't prove this life birth without belief and you are talking about eternal father and eternal scriptures of Sanatan Dharma ?? Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala ---------------------------- Radhey Radhey The interpretation by Mr Venu of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " reminds me of what is stated in BG 18:32. It squarely opposite of what is reality and highly dangerous. " skilled karmas " are not " yoga " - as Mr Venu right from his first message to the last repeating, repeating and repeating. It can not be so. If this view is held true, then a thief who does theft skillfully will be declared to be a YOGI !! This interpretation along with his novel and unique theory of " change in mental metabolism " causing the sins, and mindless insistence upon theory of no re birth etc - may put him on a wrong path- spiritually. The best thing which has happened therefore for him, by Divine Will, is that he has come in touch with this divine, self less, real satsanga site ! He should thank his " prior karmas " for the same and rather than trying to teach should equip himself " mentally " to learn. Swamiji has written an entire chapter on the subject of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " . Here the skilled word has been used to GLORIFY the yoga. It means - Yoga is the skill in karmas. Your karmas become non binding only when YOGA is in them. YOGA means EQUANIMITY. Hence practice of equanimity in doing karma is skill. Nisha Chatterji -------------------- Jai Hanuman So you say, not only say, insist so frequently that " clevery executed karma " is Yoga under Gita 2:50 ! Sins get incurred only when the expectations are not met as some chemical reaction takes place in the brain and that " cleverness " of the execution of karmas is vitiated ! There is no rebirth, therefore no worry for future ! You think that some body does " ghor karma " (evil deed) very cleverly and succeeds in that, then he does not incur any sins? Now think !! Rethink ! Please read Swamiji's messages on Karma Yog / past Gita Talk messages and kindly get back to us with your findings! What Mike Bhaiyya ! It is so simple to be " Yogi " Jee !! Yogi under Holy Gita, Brother ! Dhanya Ho !! Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala ---------------------- Shri Hari The theory advanced by Venuji about incurring of sins, caused by change in mental chemistry is surprising. Almost each of his concepts need a thorough re-orientation. Good that he has reached here somehow. Let this soul get direction. Shyama Chhangani ------------------------ Mr Venu ! It is my feeling that the observations, the logic, the theories advanced in your note have not been influenced by sadhak messages in this forum, such as the discussion on " Vasudeva Sarvam " " Divine is everywhere " . Let us all be open to listening to new ideas and being brief in our own usage of words and experience the divinity in this forum! Regards Khan Jarsingh ------------------------------- My Salutations to all in this forum Interesting, really very very intersting !Will experienced and learned sadhaks clarify in detail as to whether the theories so painstakingly advanced by Mr Venu K. are correct ? I have not so far during my 6/7 month association with this forum come across concepts as such. I am more interested in his theory regarding sins and his interpretation that nicely/skillfully/cleverly executed actions make a person " yogi " under Gita. If that is so, then I think it is very simple to be " yogi " and a lot of humanity gets covered by this definition. Does Gita confirm that when expectations are not met, there are changes in the brain chemistry? Well, yes, it is difficult to establish re birth. I am eagerly looking forward to deliberations. Please also explain what is this " vaadibhi " and " darshibhi " and Gitacharya stated by Mr Venu ? Thanks Luca B --------------------------- Dear Sadhaks > > Amazing and novel theories put forward nu so laboriously 1. Theory of Rebirth 2. Theory reg Poulation increase 3 Yoga under Gita 4. Practicing vis a vis talking about Gita - need for practical living of Gita 5. Theory reg change in brain to initiate sinful conduct 6.. Mind vs Belief . Mike Keenor please clarify your response as it appeared somewhat vague. Thanks, Audrey Rodrigues ------------------------- PRIOR POSTING -Shree Hari- Dear Venu Komanduri, Firstly I will reiterate what I first quoted: Yoga Aphorism Concentration II 39 : When he is fixed in non-receiving he gets the memory of past life. Swami Vivekananda made no bones about, it he said the memory of past life is the first power a yogi obtains. Now you can say all of this is lunacy, that really is fine by me. Lord Krishna told Arjuna about the reality of rebirth/past life. Chapter 2 Even as a man casts off his worn-out clothes And then clothes himself in others which are new So the embodied casts off worn-out bodies And then enters into others which are new. (22) Of that which is born, death is sure, Of that which is dead, birth is sure. Over the unavoidable, Therefore you never should lament. (27) Chapter 4 The Holy Lord said: Many the births that I have passed– Many passed by you, Arjuna. I have full knowledge of them all, While you do not, Scorcher of Foes. (5) Many more examples, I am not sure how one rationalizes this to mean something else. Actually I will tell you something, if you apply fierce logic in your quest, not backing away from your task to be at one with the universal truth, then all your questions will melt away, but hold onto your hat! 'It is by means of their actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives.' With all due respect your water bottle analogy is like comparing, sardines to bananas. Looking at the logic of the water analogy no mater what form or where those molecules go, they remain those molecules. Now the eternal self is not mega water molecules, but the individual eternal soul, that may become part of the whole plain of oneness but remains like a water molecule that one individual, just like the one water molecule now in the ocean is existent for all of existence. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike (Keenor). --------------------------- Dear sadaks, Sri Venu Komandurisays-- Bagavan suggests tattva darsibhi is better and there is NO appeal. !08 upanashids mentions here and there that it (Upanashids) unable to describe GOD. They why strain on tattva vadibhi. By sticking and practicing SAT? Means deataching to objects and emotions, strongly knowing in mind the dear and near can collapse any time, one came alone and goes alone, all things on earth is only visible by Maya, amount of input of attachment is sorrow of same amount later, Maanusha degam Dullabam, just pretend that one is affectionate, attached, caring and perform actions (karmas) only at body level, always in Anniyachitha of Bagavan. Talking about SAT one has abosolutely NO knowledge how IT is. Can just say what imagined or very little known. One does not see Air but can feel. God is very clearly said HE is Apprameyam. Means no pramanam, not object, cannot be seen or felt by any human senses. Then HIS sankalpa to take a form and show us HIS vision. In Srimat Bagavat it is very clear about GOD told by Elephant Gajendra- HE is AKKILA KARANAM, ARPUTHA KARANAM, NISH KARANAM. May be it contradictory but has wonderful message that is said in Bagavath Geetha Transition- Like birds migrating from one place to other. Like changing cloths. In Saffire dress or Pyjama, or suit you are the same person. When Jeva leaves it takes with it it`s own Karmas, Vasanas, Dana & Dharm, Paapa & Puniya etc that was experienced on earth and NOTHING materialistically from earth. In case Jeeva leaves without anything said above, it travels on Archanathi Marg northern side of earth and reaches Paramathuma. Jai Sri Krishna B.Sathyanarayan ----------------------- Venuji, please clarify your perspective. In my eyes there appear to be vaccilation between belief and mind. Thakurlingam ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear sadaks, Once soul leaves the body, it takes nothing of worldly things is the meaning. A crorepathi on death can never carry with him anything, even his body except his own cause and effects (Karmas). Of course many has seen GOD in the past. But we never believed them. We insulted them as " Chitta Brama " . We never knew their Chitta was with Brama. Mother Andal in SriRangam has seen God. Thrirupan Alwar, Nandanar, Kannaper, Samartha Ramadoss, Bradrachalla Ramadoss, Shridi Sai Baba, Ramana Rishi, Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa showed God to Vivekanath. Paramathuma is NOT object has been discussed so many times. HE is to be known through Gyana/Bakthi. In Srimath Bagavath it is said that Bakthi Maatha unable to wake up her 2 children Gyana and Virag as Kali was Born. For a person with poorna faith, he can see God in many. For a person with distrubed & uncertain faith, even if God appears he will start thinking whether it is illusion, just like Duryodan saw Viswaroop. For Valmiki with years of Ram Naam Ant hill covering him, never lost faith. Fraction of faith lost, will show no any results. Though in Bible, the example is nice. Christ was walking on water. A disciple also wanted to walk on water. Christ said come. He walked on water. But as he was waliking on water, a doubt came in his mind , " What if I sink " . He sank. Christ said to disciple, " When you lost faith- faithlessness sank you " . Sri Ragavendar Swamy in his teen age gave food to Sri Krishna Idol which never ate. He profusly cried to extent of fainting, Sri Krishna came and ate. So was in case of Namadev. Mother Yasoda said today I will tie up Krishna. She tried with a rope and it was getting short of 2 Inches. When she surrendered to Sri Krishna saying with love,' Oh Krishna I cannot tie you. Bagavan gave HIS hip to be tied. Bakthi (physical surrender), intellect (Mind surrender), faith (Budhi Surrender) known as Trikarna Sudhi, Bagavan appears in the form you desire. Purpose of this forum is to impart Gyana so that one can see God. Guru (this forum) shows the way, it is up to one to catch up fast with faith. Have faith on a stone, Bagavan appears. Jai Sri Krishna --------------------------- Dear Sadhakom There is a hot response for my posting. Thank you all for giving me an opportunity to explain what I said and try to answer your questions. Before that I want to mention 3 of points here: (a) We all who participated in this posting believe in God, I believe we differ in how we perceive God. I do not see and do not expect you would see this as an anomaly as we are all seeking the same target in different paths (types of yoga). (b) All sadhaks may not be at the same level of sadhana and making spiritual progress at same speed. I may be at basic level and you may be at advanced stages. There is no measure to it. © Please show tolerance / constraint to different view points – when you have 6 billion people, they all could be different. Being in the advanced stages, a sadhak will show more constraint towards others (I do not need to read or quote from Gita for this simple fundamental on human relations) Since our moderator advised brevity, I will try to follow the same, but cannot be sure of the same: I studied Gita (mainly the first 7 chapters repeatedly and others once) and was relating many of the down-to-earth messages of Gitacharya to my own personal life to remove tensions, developing relationship with my fellow citizens around and writing my own observations in a dairy. When I joined this forum, the topics postings suggested to me the sadhaks are in advanced stage of saadhana. As I went through the communication, I was not clear on some statements from the sadhaks connected with postings like `samaadhi / moksha', expressions like `soul leaving body' if they have visualized these states and responding. If I were you I would not venture to answer the posting like on samaadhi vs moksha, without experiencing both the states. So my posting was to get some clarity on the practice / examples own experiences. Mike – I understood your writing then and now the same way, no disagreement with you on it. I only brought an additional point, in support of viewing Gita from different angles. Gita is neither directly nor indirectly suggesting us to switch off our brains. Use our skills and intellect, question our way up so we may progress and make the progress in a best way – is what I meant by `yogah karmasu kousalam', is also stated in Gita again as `muktasanjna karma samaacharh'. On rebirth, let me know how the following contradicts Gita? God is of many forms. For simplicity of understanding, let us say divine (purusha or Lord) form and non-divine form (prakriti – Nature). If I consider divine form as a divine ocean (water), man takes birth as the water enters into a bottle. Water + bottle(B) = man. There could be different men B1, B2, B3 etc.We identify the characteristics of the bottle (the color, the shape) to water also, so we see different men (with different colors and shapes). When death arrives, bottle breaks and water gets back to the ocean. After death, there is no B1, B2 and B3, right? It is all gone back to divine form (to God). In ocean you do cannot trace the water thrown back. There will be births from the ocean, but nothing cannot be called `rebirth'. Sorry I cannot prove it, no way different from that you cannot prove rebirths – other than believing our scriptures. Its 50: 50 chance, right? But see this: If rebirths are to be accepted as the fact (other than just belief), there has be to be 1:1. (I am taking India as an example here) How come the population exploded from 350 million to about 1000 million in about last 35 years and not before? Are we to assume that more living beings are transmuting to human beings now? I am not suggesting the above is truth, but a view point. I am open to criticism here, but be logical in what you say. Man has to pay for his own karma in this birth itself that is very much evident. If I negligently drive the car, I am sure to make accidents. Gita warns us to be more responsible and be skillful in our actions or karma. Again like I said I am focusing on Gita messages which are down-to-earth, I am not there yet where I have experienced God in every human being and treated them the same way, no I am not there yet. Vyasji At the times Gita was documented, our ancestors do not have as much writing / editing tools that have today. They have documented what has been practiced by many for 100s of years before in a very brief manner. That is the reason there are so many written commentaries about same one Gita from different great people later and there could be other reasons also. Different perspectives!! God has given man intellect and an area of independence. Within that area man has the control and beyond it others, society, nature and God. We need to use that to the fullest extent before seeking help from God. This is not `egoism', this is use of the God-gifted assets. Use intellect and do karmas skillfully, but do not desire the fruits. Desire for fruits causes expectations, microscopic changes in brain. These changes are waiting forces (papas or sins) which will spring up, when the expectations are not met, causing uncontrollable emotions for men. Is that not a rational? Is that not what our modern psychology saying? 1000s of years after Gita said the truth!! The more I see the rationality behind Gita messages, the more my admiration grows to Gitacharya. Your question on rebirth, hut and palace, difference between children of same parents. Hut and palace – how is this connected with a rebirth? If parents are wealthy, children are born in palace. By your statement, you believe that who are born in huts have done (sins), in palace have done virtues (Punya). Do not you see that is just chance but not karma? If so, how come Gandhi is not born in a hut chooses to live in huts to be close to common man? Obama, born of a poorman, now is US president. Gandhi is great because he made great karmas, not because he was born great!! Accidents – since you believe in karma, you asked such question. Did you every try blindly running across a heavy traffic of cars? You would not and I would not, because we know it is not safe, nothing to do with past life karma. Same thing with accidents. To answer your questions, when accidents happened more people died when they did not wear safety helmets / safety belts. If your statement has to be true, we do not need courts to punish criminals, because every task is governed by past life karma. Sorry about it!! Difference in children of the same parents - it is all due to DNA – genetic. If you are interested and want to be rational, you can search internet on `DNA', you will get tons of information. I did not understand your question on Krishna, sorry so I cannot answer the same. Critical examination – this word may have pained you and may be others also, I apologize if it did. That's what happens when our beliefs are hurt. I went through this painful experience when I read `Indian Philosophy' by former Indian President S.Radhakrishnan, which talks about how the 6 systems of Indian philosophy have originated, scriptures – Vedas, Upanishads and epics were (and what times) compiled. My beliefs to perceive God in human form (like Vishnu, Shiva etc) was deeply hurt. However, I had go through that pain and overcome that to now have broader belief system. Please do not be under the impression that `critical examination' is going aginst a system or philosophy. Its mindset to probe and ask questions to gather more information about whatever you do /read or study. I am not saying `right' information. Certain things do not sound logical and need deep understanding / reading of other books. Lot of people will be surprised to know that Indian geometry (mathematics) originated from or for `aagama' shastra. (To know more about it type `sulabha sutras' in Google). And now we know that sciences originated and proliferated into many branches from mathematics. So when I read Gita or other puranas, I cannot switch of my rationale if there are some questions around it. I do not think our ancestors expected that too. If so, I am wondering if so many commentaries on Gita or other scriptures are necessary. Shasaikalaji You talked about `luck' and it depends on how define `luck'. Take a minute and try to define the word `luck' or see a dictionary. We use this word in general, whether we believe in it or not, even I use it and I do not believe in it. There is positive way of having `luck' and conventional way of using it. If some one gets lottery or promotion or money, we say `he is lucky'. Is that what you mean? I consider I am lucky when I read a nice poem in `bhagavatam' that God gave me a mind to enjoy to my fullest extent. Can a billionaire enjoy that poem as much as I do if God has not given him that mind (bank balance does not change it). He can buy a top model car/ building, not the mind. He has to use his own, good or bad. Holy Gita, Ramayana or Bharata – God never said follow everything blindly. When it occurs to your brain, even if it is Vedas, Upanishads, please do have question on that, but most obediently, so the beliefs are not hurt. Your questions enrich your belief, like I explained in my note to Vyasji. Energy comes to us when we are open to criticism and same way we lose energy when we react negatively to a criticism. We are human beings with emotions. So being a science student is not that I am a scientist or any big person, the tendency to be inquisitive. Mind and belief – Can you define `mind' for me? Its is difficult, of course, our dictionaries provide definition, you can say it a `collection of thoughts, feelings and emotions'. Your beliefs come out of your `mind' and are an intense emotion. Belief is one you think is right (whether that is right or wrong for society or others). You may derive the knowledge your belief from books, parents, society and they are likely to change naturally or by force. I believe that `Vaada' is very important aspect of learning and being open about `vaada' is equally important too, I would encourage you to read the chronology of Indian scriptures, so we will have a better perspective of how much our ancestors struggled to store their wisdom for us, how they transmitted the same through generations. Sorry I took lot of your time/space, Moderatorji!!! Venu Komanduri SUMMARY OF SADHAK RESPONSES Ram Ram - No scripture recommends only tattva-vada (reading/discussing only) - Interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! - Sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal. It addresses principles and practice of ideal human conduct. All issues can be addressed. - As clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner, clarity increases - " tattva darshibhih " remain only SAT (Existence) - " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16) - Sadhak is to be tattva darsibhi (by living/practicing 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). - It is no about simply waiting for God to do. - It is by means of sadhak's actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. - The great souls, these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. - Surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan and all vasanas will be eradicated - Bhagwan will reveal himself to his children and bring his children together in the way they resort to Him. - Have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for yourr life (lessons from other pilgrims) - Implementing Gita teachings - KEY to betterment - Practices Gita in one's life probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion - Yes! one has to " live " Gita principles. There is no doubt, No contradiction. - Without cause-effect (rebirth), what causes such inequanimity in births, situations, circumstances etc.? - Critical Examination of Gita/God, is it possible? - Paramatma is not easily conquerable by our critical thinking etc. - Aren't Mind / Belief opposite / separate subjects altogether? - No need to believe in theories, believe your own experience - God and His creation are all one - WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life. KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFEBELT - GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. - THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth. Ram Ram ---------------------------- NEW POSTING -Shree Hari- Dear Venu Komanduri, Thanks for your comments on my post. I like to mention to you at first, that I have spent my whole life in the field of electronics, logic was one of my favorite subjects. There came a time in my life when logic, and common sense were confounded. (You will have to take my word on that, there will be hundreds of sadhaks who will understand what I am saying). Actually I was putting the opposite spin on the common view, that is practicing intuitively, maybe from the inner conscience a way of life, searching all avenues for answer to the paradoxes of existence. One must remember, there are many great souls in the world who have never heard of the Bhagavad Gita, and when they come across it they are amazed. Analize carefully what I wrote: 'It is by means of their actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives.' I really do not think I implied one should await for GOD, if it appeared that way I apologize. B.G. 11: Prostrating in adoration, do I crave Forgiveness: as a father forgives his son, A friend his dear friend, and a lover his love†" Thus even so should You forgive Me, O God. (44 Overjoyed am I, seeing Your form, and yet My mind is distracted with terror. Show me, In mercy Lord, only Your previous form†" O Lord of gods, Abode of the universe. (45 Purely out of interest what do you make of that from a logical approach. You ask about transition, it can come slowly a gently path, or fierce and fast, like fire. But whatever, " You keep chopping wood, and fetching water " . B.G. 2: Attached to pleasure and power Their minds are drawn away by this Speech, and to them is not granted The insight from meditation. (44) The introspective ones I talk of, ponder meditate, these 'Pilgrims', prefer a quiet life, you know scientists, technocrats, woodchoppers, whatever, but they do not seek glory. To quote you: 'I do not trust in rebirth, saying that 'people suffer from the karma of previous births' Talking of Yogis, or Yogis to be: Yoga Aphorism: Concentration II: (39). When he is fixed in none receiving, he gets the memory of past life. B.G. 18 And even that man who hears this, Full of faith and free from scoffing, He, liberated, shall attain The happy worlds of the righteous. (71) Has this been heard, O Pritha’s son, By you with a one-pointed mind? Moreover, has the delusion Of your ignorance been destroyed? (72) Arjuna said: Yea, destroyed is my delusion, And I have gained my memory Through Your grace, and my doubts are gone. I am firm; I will do Your word. (73) I hope my friend I have answers some of your questions, I can only tell you the truth as I see it. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ---------------------------- Hari Om Dear Mr Venu It is great to note that your kind self respects Gita except some portions of it. I have few questions. Kindly oblige by replying to the same. Please use your rational/logical mind and sharp intellect while responding so that we may reap maximum benefits. What is that " cleverness " which you referred while giving your version of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " ? Since you don't believe in rebirth, hence by your logical and rational sharp mind/intellect/ego please enlighten us as to how one child gets born in a hut and another in a palace? Is it pure coincidence or there are some laws behind the same? Why one should abstain from evil conduct? Why not, at least when one is sure of death, one should reap maximum pleasure from the world , by whatever means, as there will no rebirth to pay for_ Since there are no sins/virtues accumulating? What/Who leaves a live body so as to make it a corpse? How come 2 children of same parents have differences, inspite of living in same environment? How come in an accident one survives while another does not? Your more learned views are also solicited on that " karma kanda/swarga bhog " verses of Gitaji referred by you. What according to you may be the reasons of Lord Krishna advising us not to fall prey to the enticement of Karma Kand of Vedas? You said Sir that Krishna lives in all beings. Can you enlighten us as to why and for what time and since when? " Critical examination of Gita " - what according to you makes that necessary? Who is qualified to conduct that examination? What should be the basis of such exercise? How it should be conducted- any yardsticks in your logical/rationale mind ? Your elaborate views are solicited for benefit of us all. Most of the Sadhaks in this forum , including me, have more belief than logic/rationale. Your association and contribution therefore should enrich us. May be in the end you also walk out richer too. I trust you will respond " positively " . Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Jai Hanuman Venuji Maharaj ! I noted your kind advice to our Brother Mike Keenor . I quote below the last para - Kindly elaborate as to what is this " belief " ? Being a science student yourself and luckily ( " luckily " -since you don't believe in rebirth etc-or you don't believe in " luck " also ?) you also have mind and sharp intellect. Naturally , therefore, you critically evaluate everything before any acceptance- even if that is Holy Gita. Then what is this animal called " belief " which you referred in your elaborate advice to Mike Bhaiyya? Where then, Jee, is space for " belief " in your critical/sharp/logical/rational/thinking/evaluating/analytical/energe tic as well as energy producing/imaginative mind and intellect? Are not mind and belief two different and opposite subjects altogether? Like North Pole and South Pole? Bolo Jee! Boliye Sir !! Waiting for a positive response, Jee. Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram What " rationale " what " critical exam " We think, God is that easily conquerable by us? by our rationale and critical examination? Until one realizes the a speck on nothingness that we are compared to God ...then and then only true knowledge will reveal itself (rather we will allow it to flow into us) . We are like that upside down bowl, when it is raining. Swamiji has given this example... that the rain is pouring equallly on all. What can God do if we chose to keep our bowl, upside down? He is equally accessible to all. No one is forcing one to believe. Let us believe in our own experience. All our lives we have been learning only from " cause and effect " no other reason. We avoid fire, because sometime or the other we felt the heat and knew it to be dangerous. We learn from our mistakes, because there is a consequence. There is a price to be paid. We don't need to believe in theories as Swamiji says, just believe in our own experiences(anubhav). Ram Ram ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om. Hinduism never never compels one to read Gita at any point of one's life. There may be crores of hindus pass by their birth without even looking at HOLY GITA. Krushna has never uttered a word that everyone should surely read GIta. Krushna has given us Gita not to just read it and please HIM!!!!!!! He has taken pity on each and everyone of us!!!! We really dont understand the birth cycle at all !!!!! TO Krushna is attached the Vishnu Maya and Krushna is OMNI PRESENT in PRACRUTHI (Nature) !!!! WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life !!!! We keep facing cyclone after cyclone and we get lost in this action of pracruthi (Nature) !!!! Some start losing faith in God as they are shaken as disaster after disaster ruin their life !!!! This continues till we surrender to Krushna and take Gita in our hand. Here comes a great change in our life as KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFE BELT ---GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. He explains in detail the dimensions of nature-pracruthi, what our body is made of, what our mind does, what our intellect does, what is SATH CHITH. He has taken great care to educate us on Sthira Bhuddhi, Ignorance and true knowledge. THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth !!!!! So interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! With regards, Usha Sridhar. ---------------------------- Hari Om Dear Sadhak Venu ! What is your question? I wonder if any sadhak contradicted what you mean to say ! Yes- one has to " live " Gita principles. How and where there is doubt on the same? Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B ---------------------------- Re:Tatwa vaadibhi to tatva darsibhi Venu Komanduri is absolutely right: the ultimate aim is tatva darsibhi, though tatva darsibhi may be the initial step towards that. If an individual gets too attached to discussions and interpretation on Gita, the focus on practice to become tatva darsibhi may be lost. And, when one practices Gita in one's life it is probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion on Gita. I am sure God will help and direct you along the path. If you have learnt that God and His creation are all one, realize that by living your life on that principle even as you have to act as a person distict from others. Difficult. But I try this path hoping that one day God will ensure successful transition to Oneness. Basudeb Sen ---------------------------- Dear Sadhak Community There is a nice response from Mike Keenor, nice in the sense there is outpouring positivism. I approached Gita in many ways - scientific, athiestic and spiritual. From all the angles I see there is immense wisdom stored in Gita. Ever since I have been studying Gita, specially the last 2 years, I am amazed at the down to earth messages. So I remain on earth and talk about the practical messages clearly indicated, they are neither hidden nor hinted, in Gita. Being a science student and in engineering profession, I always question things / dictum before my mind sees the rationale behind them - be it Vedas / Gita or otherwise. There are many slokas in Gita that showers the life management principles even if I study them as an athiest - ignore the fruits of desires (twaktaphalam), live in the 9-holed town (navadwarava pure dehi). Only to say 'critical examination of any scripture' is utmost necessary, I quote from Gita ( 2:42, 2:43, 2:44 ) which suggested not get trapped by the 'karma kanda' /'swargabhoga' (the rituals and the pleasures of the heaven) in the early part of Vedas. That is being rational about the objective of Gita. Despite my strong faith and belief in Gita, I do not trust in rebirth, saying that 'people suffer from the karma of previous births', 'concept of sin / virtue' as account maintained by God or some power. No! I do not!! There can be many interpretations to those words / usages in Gita. Remember that though Gita was documented in 2nd century AD, the slokas were known even before 1500 BC. We are 3500 years from the source and its meaning. Mike - I like your positivism, but Gita is also suggesting 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - meaning there is controllable part the sadhak has to do (not waiting for God's hand), wherever he cannot, he should seek help from others (remember God lives in all). For all this sport of activities, the energy comes from the positivism / belief / imagination /critical thinking /relating the messages to the practical difficulties of life. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram The KARMA issue will be addressed as a separate topic. Kindly stay with one topic and subject at hand. Gita Talk Moderators, Ram Ram ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear Venu Komanduri, B.G. 4 In whatever way they resort To Me do I thus reward them. It is My path which ev'rywhere All men follow, O Arjuna. (11). People the world over from many different faiths, or even non faiths, who started their journey so very long ago, who hear as it were the ringing of the sacred bells, and have a yearning in their hearts for the unknown Beloved, they feel that Love, they know it is there. Do you not think that Divine Krishna would not take his children by the hand and show them the way home, 'The last miles'. It is by means of their actions by their morality and there love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. Do you think HE would not bring his children together so they may find comfort, be supported and support others in Divine Forum. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ----------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Wonderful dear Venu. In other words, you are telling us all to shut up! Yes that is very much required for any serious seeker. You are very right … no scripture recommends tattva-vada. Definitely, tattva-vada can be a potential plague … most often, it is better to be ignorant rather than being a tattava-vadin: Andhantamah pravishanti ye avidyaamupaasate | Tato bhuya iva te tamo ye u vidyaayaam rataah || But, … is there any other way toward becoming a tattva-darshin? Manasaivedamaaptavyam neha naanaasti kinchana || We have to retrace the same path in which we collected our garbage (ignorance and inertia) to remove the same – our minds and bodies. You know, the vaccine is in the very germ! We have to turn the same germ against itself to releive ourselves from our deseases. We are helpless but to indulge in this vada (fight with our own bodily and mental demands) to remove the ignorance and inertia harbored within. The darshana (attainment of peace) is an eventuality of the vada (the war within). No war … no peace! No war within is a suicide in other words … Tangste pretyaabhigacchhanti ye kechaatmahano janaah || One who persihes without fighting the ignorance and inertia harbored within is the worst of all suicides. Therefore, a true vada (a truthful fight against one's own ignorance and inertia - you may want to call the vaccine, Tattva Vimarsha) is very essential to attain The Peace (Tattva Darshana) … after all a war is a war … things can go wrong … but it is definitely better than a suicide … definitely better than being consumed by our own tendencies as time passes over rendering no resistance like a pashu … Off course, the vada has the most vicious side effect that it itself can become the biggest vasana … well, as far as one is cognizant of the vada and its vicuous side effects, it is good and … that is the only way. The clouds of our ignorance and inertia become thinner and thinner as our truthfulness in our Tattva Vada intensifies in our internal search for the truth (Vada should be pitched against one's own well- established stupidity NOT ON THE STUPIDITY WISHFULLY PERCEIVED IN OTHERS!). Clarity of the truth (Tattva darshana) naturally increases as the clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner and thinner … it is an eventuality that we look forward to so that we can finally perform your wonderful suggestion – SHUT UP! Till then … let us poor things perform the ritual waging the war within. Once in a while, please keep peeping in to remind us that we really wage it only for the correct reason (to burn the ignorance within) and only on the correct targets (to uproot the inertia within). That is helpful. THANK YOU. Respects. Naga Narayana ------------------------------- Dear sadaks, Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' This is what Bagavan said to Arjuna. Bagavan said, " What is use of knowing all knowledge when I (bagavan) is right in front of you " . Means do not worry of Sadanas, Karmas, Scripts, knowledge on Sat etc when the SAT (bagavan) has comes. That is surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan who will take care of all the good what knowledge could give and also eradicate all vasanas, Karmas by HIS sankalpa itself. We have been trying over several births and still landing here. But if Bagavan tries you, the there is no any obstacle to liberate. But if Bagavan wants to try one, then he must have Niskama Prema Bakthi, which Bagavan has said in Geetha. Jai Sri Krishna baiya sathyanarayan =========================================== Happy new year 2009 to all sadhaks Thanks for your co-operation and guide regarding Gita 2.16 pawan singhal -------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The Q of Venuji had two facets. One re the object of this Satsanga Forum. While I am not in any way a Founder of this Forum but as I see there is a common thread binding all Sadhaks - Swamiji Shri Ramsukhdasji Maharaj and Holy Gita. The sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal- beyond all faiths and religions- covering humanity at large. This forum is in my view at present " evolving " and the deliberations are getting divine and divine. We , in fact, can easily state that we are part of a Jnana Yagya within the meaning of Holy Gita. Hence I don't see any limitations on the scope of this forum. Since Holy Gita encompasses entire humanity , both principles and practice of ideal human conduct - I see nothing wrong in our addressing any type of problems faced by Sadhaks in their spiritual journey. All my personal views as one of the many Sadhaks of this divine group. Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Dear all , Yes , if we can implement the teachings of gita , in our day to day living , not only will it make life Less stressful , but more meaningful . After all we live in our communities and mingle / work / interact, so i Feel as long as we understand The true meaning (spirit of the message ) of the message sought to be Conveyed by the gita and try & Impact the same in our lives , things will be much better . In short ,what we want to be is better human beings , because only than can we be better Parents / children / friends / spouses /sadhaks / teachers/ Rgds Arvind Malhotra ---------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The very existence is " SAT " . Those who have experienced the characteristics of " SAT " and ever changing function of nature- " ASAT " , they in practice experience " their obvious , self proven, natural, automatic positioning in the existence viz SAT . In their experience there is nothing known as ASAT existing. In other words in their experience only SAT is existing- nothing else is existing. Such great people are called " tattva darshibhih " . In their experience only their positioning in SAT- imperishable, permanent, ever present existence- remains. Through that positioning they get highest rewards. In BG 2:16- the term " ubhayorapi " - represents " conscience " ! " Antah " - represents " element knowledge " !! " Drishtah " - represents " experience " !!! Meaning thereby that " conscience has transformed ( " transition " term as used by the questioner) in to the experiential knowledge and now what has remained is SAT - existence only! This is the highest state of Jnana Yoga!! The Highest reward! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16). Swamiji has been very clear about this... " Real " (Sat) is our natural state. Natural is what needs no effort. It is ever attained. It simply IS. Be situate in it. The essence (Real) is always there - will always be there. The real is not created. The unreal is created from the Real, stays in the real and then merges in the real. It has no existence of its own. One has to simply give importance to ones own experience. No need to believe in the scriptures. Your existence always IS. What is NOT can never exist. The IS always remains IS. To experience 'I AM', no effort is required. No practice. There is no doubt of our existence. The real essence is our existence. The base, the foundation of all appearance - of all creation. That is Paramatma (Supreme Consciousness,God). Meera Das Ram Ram ---------------------------- This is the sanest stuff I heard in a while! Hare Krishna! Gurunath Prakash ------------------------------ ORIGINAL QUESTION Dear Sadhak Community (1) Is the purpose of this forum only to discuss the meaning behind Gita slokas? and / or (2) interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life? (By practical life, I mean one living the normal life while in the quest for God, Gita does not shun the karma, but the attachment towards it) While I understand both are important, Gita is directing its readers like us to grow from Tatwa vaadibhi (one who reads and discusses about the essential element) to tatva darsibhi (one who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat'). I am particularly and practically interested in this transition, because some of the comments from my fellow sadhaks like 'then the soul leaves the body','everything has nothing, while nothing has every thing' while the same people are also suggesting 'no one may have seen God' 'Tatvadarsibhi' (who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat') is referred in Gita 2:16 of Sankhya Yoga. Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' here. Let me know your views on the transition. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- ---------------------------- GITA TALK GROUP GUIDELINES: 1. Purpose of the group is to help Sadhakas clarify their doubts related to Gitaji shalokas. Therefore, responses which further clarify the understanding of Gitaji, will only be posted. 2. Wherever possible, please quote Gitaji or other scriptures to substantiate your response. 3. Kindly limit personal feelings, opinions, beliefs etc. to the extent that they further help in understanding the Gita shlokas 4. Please be as concise and to the point as possible, respecting sadhaka's time. 5. Kindly focus your writing to the subject at hand only. 6. Please do not include links to the other sites or other organizations. 7. Kindly do not include your personal information such as phone number, address etc. 8. Please do not address the response to a particular individual since the message is going to the entire group. 9. Due to the large readership, all responses may not be posted. 10. Moderator at his discretion, may modify the posting, if content is unclear or not appropriate for distribution to the group. 11. Please respond taking into consideration the novices, youth, westerners, non-sectarian audience. Kindly limit the use to Sanskrit words only, rather provide the English word with Sanskrit bracketed wherever possible. MODERATOR Ram Ram ------------------------ Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2009 Report Share Posted February 12, 2009 FOLLOW-UP ISSUE Gita also says - 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - not waiting for God's hand. ---------------------------- NEW POSTING -Shree Hari- Dear Venuji, Which cause and effect theory which domain, is 'this domain'. I did a little research, this is a 3000 year old subject: There is the modern 'Ishikawa diagram' used for analyzing events. There is a Hindu concept, espoused by the Nyaya Sutras, needs a lot of study,(at least by me). There is a modern logical form, based on what I would call boolean logic/algebra,(felt more comfortable with that). The Buddhist ...... You see Venuji, it is fine to make a statement, but please qualify it, then we have real debate, thats all. To answer your question about the exploding population, I will turn to that wonderful, Swami Vivekananda,(I now understand what a beautiful name that is, thank you Sadhaks). .........And thus through pleasure and pain, through good and evil, the infinite river of souls is flowing into the ocean of perfection, of self-realisation. Glory unto those who have realised their own nature. May their blessing be on us all. (May I humbly add Amen). With Respect and Divine Love, Mike (Keenor). -------------------------------- Jai Shri Krishna Sadhak Venuji while answering to the query of Sadhanaji stated that water goes from bottle to ocean in the same manner as it transfers from one bottle to another or from ocean to bottle. Good ! Now this observation of Venuji is " science backed " ( rationality/mind backed) or " belief backed " or " I dont know backed " ( ignorance / maya backed) ? Pls clarify ! The thing which you directly can not visualise , viz macro/micro worlds ( in your own words only Venuji ) , you are INFORMING to us that it exists. Not only you are informing us reg the existence of the same, you are also confirming that there is ORDERLINESS existing in that unvisualised world !!! Isnt it ? Now this statement is " science backed " or " belief backed " ? Further, in your last two postings you referred to " gifts of God " - once with reference to mind/intellect and now with respect to " yoga karmashu kaushalam " ! Right ? Now this " God " is proved by science or it is your " belief " only ? Do you have " power of belief " also given as " gift of God " or not? If yes, are you aware where it should be used and where not ? Similarly for " God's gift " to you of mind/intellect , you should be aware where it can be used and where it is useless ! Isnt it Venuji ? Please clarify and oblige ! Saraswati Sharma ------------------------------ Namaskar May I request Mr Venu or other sadhaks to clarify as to what is difference between Law Of Karma and theory of Cause and Effect ? Please also clarify in the backdrop of his own Question that one should not wait for " God's hand' as to how in " yoga karmashu kaushalam " , the divine will is relevant? Now that Mr Venu has conceded that God's grace maintains great orderliness in the world, does this mean there is reason / laws operating in this world directly under the control of that Supreme God ? If yes, then please explain how births and rebirths are not outcome of Law of Karma being operated by God/Nature ? If no, then please explain own statements reg : divine will, great orderliness etc quoted above. Now he should not say that birth of one person in a hut and another in palace is BY CHANCE or by DNA impact. Does this not solve " population explosion " query referred by him? If no, then why? By the way what is this " macroscopic world " and " microscopic world " ? Is there any scientific basis for his classification? Whether separate laws are applicable for these worlds? Who lives in macro world as compared to micro world? Does " God's hand " cease to function in one world and operates in another? Regards Prepetina G ---------------------------- Radhey Krishna Radhey Krishna Venuji ! Noticed the caption to this question of yours? " Transition from Read-Learned Knowledge to Experiential Knowledge- Realisation " !!! Note that you are exactly now in the boat which is on the way to make this happen to you . Earlier you believed that for others. Now you are undergoing this " transformation " and transition from the bookish knowledge you had so far to experiential knowledge which this forum will provide you. If you have capacity to believe then trust this statement. Divine, isnt it? Be a student, knowledge will gallop towards you. You may say whatever, but you can never STOP BELIEVING. In fact the very cause why you enrolled to this forum is " divine will " . Isnt it a belief? Consider the following : CHARO VED DHANDHOR KE , ANT KAHOGE RAAM ! TO RAJJAB PAHELE KAHO, ITNE HI MAIN KAAM !! After studying all Vedas, in the end you will have to say (believe in) Raam ( Raam, Raam ...) ! Says Saint Rajjabji- O Praani, why then you are not saying now itself that, your task gets over with that !! Meaning: Whatever arguments, science, DNAs, Geometry, History, Philosophy you may talk of, in the end, this forum will make you accept the truth. Then why not you accept now itself the futility of your arguments and say : I agree friends, I am yours. Then start contributing to the deliberations as happily as others are doing. EXPERIENTIAL KNOWLEDGE - this is tattva darsibhi. Arti Ranga ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om Thank you Venuji for being brief and focussed. However, please address our basic query : What is that cleverness/skill about which you again talked in this posting also ? If it is equanimity as pointed out to you then drop forever your notion that there is any need for " acquisition " of any thing by effort in order to comply with BG 2:50. You are " equanimous " by your very nature ! Note again that 2:49 defines " yoga " and 2:50 IS NOT DEFINITION OF YOGA but " mahima " (glory) of Yoga (equanimity). Don't link equanimity with practice or skill to be acquired or efforts. Practice and skills are needed for karmas. Equanimity itself is skill. No karmas are needed to acquire the same. Otherwise, explain to us what needs to be acquired and how ? What are the skills referred by you? In any case, explain as to what is " attachment " referred in your last posting? Understand the difference between " acquiring " and " applying " ! We have to " apply " equanimity into our karmas not " acquire " it by our karmas. Now state what kind of " rationality " you were referring in your opening statements of your last posting? Don't say please: Sadhak Brethrens " mistook " you. Say: either You are now clear or not yet clear. Yes or no. Conclude, don't keep a subject open !! While addressing your theory/observations reg Law of Karma (essentially Law of cause and effect) please address specific queries of Sadhanaji, Shashikalaji and our young sadhak Varunji, as well as others including me. Take a day more, jot down in a systematic and scientific manner all the Qs/responses to you by various sadhaks and address them. May be while addressing them itself you get clearer. As Brother Mike stated very rightly : Keep your hat on ! Stick to your task of finding out universal truth and watch in an " equanimous " manner as to how your theories, questions melt away. Try your level best however to justify them. Once understood " accept " ! Nothing wrong in that. Say bravely so ! You are among sadhaks, none of whom as Sadhanaji pointed out are " ponga pandits " . None wants to criticise other. Our Chairman Rajaji does not like very lengthy descriptions and rightly so, therefore let us be concise and precise. Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B ------------------------------ Dear Sadhakom As Sadhnaji mentioned, yes the divine energy can go into another bottle. I am not refuting the rebirth theory as much as any one can prove it too. I just do not believe, see the population explosion I indicated in my post below. It suggests me the view point of the bottle, please do not call it as a thoery - it has no breadth and depth, nor do I have the knowledge to create one. To answer your question, 'how the divine energy went into the bottle', please consider same it went in the same as the Hindu rebirth - in stead of bottle to bottle, it is ocean to bottle. Yogah Karmas Kausalam - 'by God's will' - Its absolutely true. I am not talking about the ego here. There is a lot in the world that man can do without attachment and with what HE gave us (so it is always by his 'gifted / given' will). In this domain, we will be better positioned to use 'cause and effect' theory, not 'Law of Karma'. [There is macroscopic world and the microscopic world which we directly cannot visualize and which are maintained with great orderliness again because of HIS grace]. Regards Venu Komanduri ------------------------------- Radhey Radhey Venuji has a lot of questions to answer. Yes! as Sadhanaji says - none of us are ponga pandits. Coming to the subject of Gitaji 2:50 let me state that Swamiji has categorically emphasised that " equanimity " is there in every human being as God is there in every human being. God is equanimous , isnt it? There is no market where it is being sold. You already have it. Proof ? With respect to entire universe, people and things, with the exception and only exception of what you call me or mine or my likings or dislikings - you and me are even today equanimous only.. I wonder what kind of rationality or efforts or karmas or use of mind or intellect is being advocated to acquire the thing which is already with us? Radhey Radhey Nisha Chatterji ----------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear Sadaks, One Sadak said, " Gita also says - 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - not waiting for God's hand. " Excellent very short explanation. But can we take the line instead of " not waiting for God`s hand " ---AS--- " performing things (Actions) as per God` s will. Jai Sri Krishna B.Sathyanarayan ---------------------------- Dear Sadhak, It is not necessary that a learned person is realized or a realized one is learned. But for sure a realized know all the answers, as they are hidden deep in SELF. We all sadhak/sadhika in this forum are practicing the " Sat " as much as God wants us to. So those who have seen the Truth are also sincerely practicing IT.I have no doubt about that. No ponga pandits here. Now in yr words- (By practical life, I mean one living the normal life while in the quest for God, Gita does not shun the karma, but the attachment towards it) I always quote monkey's story who grabs peas in the fist and wants to take his hand out of the container, but he cannot. To take his hand out of the container he must drop the peas. We want to live a " practical normal life while in quest for God " this very desire to live a normal life is a hindrance to reach God. If someone sincerely wants to reach God, he/she must drop all desires...How can one reach God while holding Sansar tightly ? Now to yr theories about rebirths and yoga. Could you please tell us how the water went into the bottle ? Surely if water goes back to ocean, there is no rebirth, but what if the water keeps on changing bottles? (the same desire which brings water into the bottle will multiply and force water to change different bottles unless it rerealizests true nature and uselessness of bottles) My dear, you have longing for Truth but you are trying to reach it through yr mind. Drop yr mind, drop yr thinking and surrender to Lord Krishna, He will unfold the Truth for you...Believe me it is not difficult. When you will face the Truth, you will laugh and cry at the same time. Trust Lord Krishna, believe in His words, follow His words.... Instead of reading many puranas, just read Gitaji and explanation given by Swamiji.Go deep within,cry for Him, Light will be there. Nasto vidhyate bhavo, nabhavo vidhyate sat..Gitaji Our mind(thought) is the only hindrance in seeing the Truth. Go in deep silence, meditate and attend the thoughtless stage, and you will see the Truth!!! Because only " Sat " Exist... with Love, a sadhika Sadhna Karigar ----------------------------- Rebirth The body made up of bones, flesh, blood etc. is known as the gross body. Inside this gross body is subtle body. This subtle body comprise of 17 elements. They are five senses of knowledge (ears, nose, eyes, tongue and skin), five senses of performing actions (hands, feet, mouth, genital organ and anus), five life-breath (pran, apan, saman, vyan and udan), mind and intellect. These 17 elements constitute the subtle body. Inside this subtle body is causal body which is also known as ignorance-body (agyanmay-kosh) and nature (swabhav). Action holds prominence in gross body, thinking holds prominence in subtle body and positioning holds prominence in causal body. Wake- state is an affair of gross body, dream-state is an affair of subtle body and deep-sleep state (when we don't remember anything) is an affair of causal body. Senses, mind and intellect i.e. subtle body resides in life-breath. At the time of death, this life-breath assembles in heart. When the last breath is exhaled this subtle body (with causal body inside) departs from any of the nine gates of the gross body. This departure of subtle body from gross body is only known as death. Jeeva's next body is determined by last thought. Lord says " Arjun, thinking of whatever entity one leaves the body at the time of death, that and that alone one attains, being ever absorbed in that thought " (Gita 8.6) This subtle body then lives in space. In whichever womb the jeeva has to take next birth it will first go in that male body either through breath or any food particle. He will then make way in female body through sexual intercourse. In one drop of man's semen there are lakhs of jeevas (sperm cells). Out of this only that jeeva which has strong karma relationship and is destined to take birth will find place in female's womb. Rest other jeevas will die. In due course that sperm cell will grow limbs, hands, mouth etc. Then after stipulated time it will come out of womb. This whole process is known as rebirth. It is the subtle body which comes and goes. Lord says " Even as the wind wafts scents from their seat, so, too, the Jivatma, which is the controller of the body etc., taking the mind and senses from the body, which it leaves behind, forthwith migrates to the body which it acquires. " (Gita 15.8) Soul does not come and go anywhere. That thing which comes and goes anywhere is bound by time and space. That thing which is bound by time and space, it can never be imperishable. But soul is imperishable. For the soul, Lord says " Know that alone to be imperishable which pervades this universe " (Gita 2.17) That imperishable element which pervades this universe how can it go from one body to another. No way. Wherever in Gita and other Hindu scriptures it is said that the soul leaves the body etc. it should be taken for the subtle body. Some FAQ 1. When the subtle body departs from gross body why is it not visible? A. It is not visible because it is not a subject of eyes. One sense cannot even perform the same functioning of another sense i.e. smelling, touching, tasting etc. cannot be done by eyes. Subtle body is beyond senses so it cannot be seen, heard, touched etc. 2. The organs like tongue, eyes etc. of the gross body, do these elements belong to subtle body? A. No. Tongue, eyes, hands, mouth etc. are parts of the gross body. The power to hear, touch, see, taste and smell forms the five senses of knowledge of subtle body. Similarly the power to walk, eat and speak, give and take, urinate and passing feces forms the five senses of action of subtle body. All these powers are in life-breath and it appears in respective parts of the body. For example, the power of seeing comes to eyes etc. 3. Where are the five pran located? A. Pran, Apan, Saman, Udan and Vyan respectively reside in heart, anus, navel, throat and entire body. If anyone has knowledge of what today's science has said about the 17 elements of the subtle body, please share with the whole group. Hare Krishna Varun P. Paprunia ----------------------------- Priy Sadhaks I think we shouldnt involve in I say u say. rather we must understand & experience wat geetaji says. Gyata-Gyan-Gyeya drista-darshan-drishya When all three churn upto only one ur Q will be solved. Its ASHABD PAD. ANUBHAVGAMYA. Thanx Raja Gurdasani ---------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram Rajaji or anyone, If possible would appreciate the english meanings. From Gita Talk Moderators ---------------------- Dear Sadhakom Gita has defined yoga in few places. Let us just take one subject at a time. I used (2:50) 'yogah karmasu kausalam' to refer to rationality. Yes, there is already reference of yoga in 2:48 'Yogastah kuru karmani sangam tvatka dhanajnjaya, sidhya asidhyo samobhutva, samatvam yoga uchyate' meaning 'the eqanimity in doing karma'. Here Gitacharya is advising the sadhak to acquire the skill to the karma wthout attchment and with equanimity. Sadhak would need these acquire this qualilites of attachment and equanimity by practice and once one acquire them the sadhak will be in a position 'yogastha' to do them. Here my brethren mistook me that 'acquiring any skill is yogah'. This sloka is down to earth in that whether a person believes in God or not, he attains the results if he acquires this skill. Will talk about law of karma / rebirth as a separate topic. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Shree Hari- Dear Moderator, My hands have been tied, and thus it must remain, for the good of myself and others. I have always inferred that absolute desire for the Truth, and the primordial cry to GOD, has awesome power, and will be answered. What I have pasted below is a mute response to Sister Shashikalaji's question to me, an answer in silence. This is what I wrote when dealing with more than I thought possible. but GOD gives only what you can take, I wrote it about ten or eleven years ago.(I knew nothing of Jeeva, and the wisdom of Sanatana Dharma, at that time). That Is Me If my soul is racked in pain, and every fiber of being cries out in remorse of past deeds. It's just me. And my body goes numb with fear, with screaming voices hunting me, with anger and indignation rising within. That's me. Falling to the ground, my heart broken in disbelief and awful horror, deep mourning for a lost beloved. Simply me. Laying in sad loneliness of passing life, passing through the void of death to new life and the joy of birth. Again is me. Watching in horror at mans insanity, turning the cross of joy and hope into a symbol of greatest darkness. That's me. Feeling the joy and bliss of the angels embrace, and the breathtaking divine love of God. Yes that's me. MK With Respect and Divine Love, Mike (Keenor) ---------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram What Mike has written, is a clear indication that just like the law of gravity existed even before Newton's discovery, similarly Sanatana Dharma existed even before it's discovery. From Gita Talk Moderators, Ram Ram ----------------------------- Hari Om Venuji ! You have skipped many of questions raised by me. You said: When death arrives, bottle breaks and water gets back to the ocean. After death, there is no B1, B2 and B3, right? I say: Wrong ! Absolutely wrong !! You don't go back to ocean till you are liberated. Death is just change of cloths- you keep travelling in various bodies till you are emancipated. Read Gita again not for a tip or two, but for very knowledge as to who you are, why you are, what are you doing, and what you should be doing. You say: Man has to pay for his own karma in this birth itself that is very much evident. If I negligently drive the car, I am sure to make accidents. I say: It is not at all evident- where is the Q of " very much evident " ? People walking on footpaths can also get hit without being negligent. Read newspapers on a daily basis. You say: Gita warns us to be more responsible and be skillful in our actions or karma. I say: Again wrong ! " Yogah Karmashu kausalam " does not mean that yoga is skillful karmas. It means- In doing Karmas, skill is Yoga (Equanimity) ! Skill is an adjective/ respect given to Equanimity not to karmas. You say: Again like I said I am focusing on Gita messages which are down-to- earth. I say: There is no message of Gita which is not down to earth. You Say: I am not there yet where I have experienced God in every human being and treated them the same way, no I am not there yet. I say: Make that your goal for balance life. Gita, Saints, Scriptures, Satsanga help you there. Believe in them. You have power of belief given to you by God. Utilise that more often than not, particularly on spiritual matters. Else prove to us that you never 'believed' ! You say: At the times Gita was documented, our ancestors do not have as much writing / editing tools that have today. They have documented what has been practiced by many for 100s of years before in a very brief manner. I say: You have not seen the enormity of Scriptures of Sanatan Dharma. Vedas, Puranas, Smritis, Upnishads, Mahabharata, Ramayana, Ramcharitmans, Gita - who says they are brief? You say: God has given man intellect and ......... We need to use that to the fullest extent before seeking help from God... Use intellect and do karmas skillfully, but do not desire the fruits. Desire for fruits causes expectations, microscopic changes in brain. These changes are waiting forces (papas or sins) which will spring up, when the expectations are not met, causing uncontrollable emotions for men. Is that not a rational? I Say: Microscopic changes occur in not only mind but in every element belonging to nature. " To change " is essential characteristics of nature. Microscopic changes do not necessarily result in 'sins' ! Can't they result in virtues? Besides, mind/intellect you have also been given power of discrimination. One should use that also ! What kind of use you can make of those elements which do not remain static even for a fraction of a second ? There is nothing wrong in throwing the mind into a dust bin after you have used it for performance of your duties. Recommended for you, too ! Use 'viveka' more than mind. Former never changes unlike the latter. You say: Your question on rebirth, hut and palace, difference between children of same parents. Hut and palace " how is this connected with a rebirth? If parents are wealthy, children are born in palace. By your statement, you believe that who are born in huts have done (sins), in palace have done virtues (Punya). Do not you see that is just chance but not karma? I say: Yes ! I believe and have reasons to believe that past life virtues/sins (karmas) produce this life births. No I don't see that it is just a chance. If I do believe in what you say I will fall within the ambit of BG 16:8 ! I have support of Sanatan Dharma behind me ! What is the use of reading Gita if we can't distinguish between soul and body? Gita is not some novel or fiction ! You say: If so, how come Gandhi is not born in a hut chooses to live in huts to be close to common man? Obama, born of a poorman, now is US president. Gandhi is great because he made great karmas, not because he was born great!! I say: " Prior " life karmas cause rebirths. You are unnecessarily talking about " present " life karmas. Totally irrelevant. You say: Accidents " since you believe in karma, you asked such question. I say: Don't you believe in karma? Read your preceding paragraph. You say: Same thing with accidents. To answer your questions, when accidents happened more people died when they did not wear safety helmets/ safety belts. I say: Have you never heard of accidental deaths even when safety helmets/seat belts are fully in position. You say: If your statement has to be true, we do not need courts to punish criminals, because every task is governed by past life karma. Sorry about it!! I say: Who said " every task is governed by past life karma " ? Please do not rely too much on your mind. It changes !! We are talking about re birth Dear Sir ! You say: Difference in children of the same parents - it is all due to DNA genetic. I say: What causes that difference, when parents are same ?? Reply ! Chance/luck/karmas ?? Read BG 16:8 and BG 8:19 ! You say: I did not understand your question on Krishna, sorry so I cannot answer the same. I say: I can appreciate why you can not understand and reply. This will have to be understood if not now , then tomorrow or may be say 100 aeons later. We can't run away from it. Better do it in this human birth only. You say: So when I read Gita or other puranas, I cannot switch of my rationale if there are some questions around it. I do not think our ancestors expected that too. I say I believe that our ancestors were wiser and far far better than us and expected many things which are even yet beyond us. There are times when one has to switch off what you call rationale (mind) and simply Believe ! We have to believe! In fact you are all along believing only, but you don't know that you are believing ! That is MAYA !! Over to Brother Mike and Shashikalaji !! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B ------------------------------- -Shree Hari- Dear Audrey, Please ask me to clarify my response, with a direct question, that would help me a lot. Thanks. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike (Keenor). ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING thought this may be of value dinesh Become givers, not takers: Spiritualists Patel, Dinesh -------------------------------- Hari Om I often used to wonder as to why Swamiji wrote a separate article in many books on " Yogah Karmashu Kaushalam " stated in BG 2:50. Then I thought that it is to establish importance of " Equanimity " in practical life. But when I read interpretation of Mr Venu along with his theory of sins and concept of no re-birth , it occurred to me how great 'visionary' (of trends in Kaliyuga) was Swamiji Ramsukhdasji Maharaj. No Mr Venu ! It does not mean - " Cleverness in doing karmas is Yoga " . It means - In doing karma equanimity(yoga) is skill ! Here the term " kaushalam " ( cleverness/skill) is an adjective/respect/ glory (mahimaa) of " equanimity " not of karmas. Chaos in the world will emerge if the interpretation taken by you is held valid. What to say when it is with your theory of incurring sin and no rebirth ! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Jai Hanuman Mr Venu ! Replies to some of your observations, please kindly keep an open mind. These are not criticisms. We are all only sadhaks. You said that Gita is neither directly nor indirectly suggesting us to switch off our brains. Reply is that in fact Gita is both directly and indirectly suggesting us to switch off our brains !! Post a separate Q on this. We shall tell you as to how, Jee ! Belief can be very powerful and must not be underestimated. Can you prove your parents " other than by just belief " ? You don't remember your birth- no body does ! Now how a human being can prove as to who is his father without " believing " based on " personal knowledge " ? No way- I repeat no way !! Be sure, you will not be able to do that - because births/rebirths are always and exclusively subject matter of " belief " only, never never of " acquired knowledge " - PURE MINDLESS BELIEF !! Come on, Jee ! Argue !! Else " accept " !!! On one hand we can't prove this life birth without belief and you are talking about eternal father and eternal scriptures of Sanatan Dharma ?? Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala ---------------------------- Radhey Radhey The interpretation by Mr Venu of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " reminds me of what is stated in BG 18:32. It squarely opposite of what is reality and highly dangerous. " skilled karmas " are not " yoga " - as Mr Venu right from his first message to the last repeating, repeating and repeating. It can not be so. If this view is held true, then a thief who does theft skillfully will be declared to be a YOGI !! This interpretation along with his novel and unique theory of " change in mental metabolism " causing the sins, and mindless insistence upon theory of no re birth etc - may put him on a wrong path- spiritually. The best thing which has happened therefore for him, by Divine Will, is that he has come in touch with this divine, self less, real satsanga site ! He should thank his " prior karmas " for the same and rather than trying to teach should equip himself " mentally " to learn. Swamiji has written an entire chapter on the subject of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " . Here the skilled word has been used to GLORIFY the yoga. It means - Yoga is the skill in karmas. Your karmas become non binding only when YOGA is in them. YOGA means EQUANIMITY. Hence practice of equanimity in doing karma is skill. Nisha Chatterji -------------------- Jai Hanuman So you say, not only say, insist so frequently that " clevery executed karma " is Yoga under Gita 2:50 ! Sins get incurred only when the expectations are not met as some chemical reaction takes place in the brain and that " cleverness " of the execution of karmas is vitiated ! There is no rebirth, therefore no worry for future ! You think that some body does " ghor karma " (evil deed) very cleverly and succeeds in that, then he does not incur any sins? Now think !! Rethink ! Please read Swamiji's messages on Karma Yog / past Gita Talk messages and kindly get back to us with your findings! What Mike Bhaiyya ! It is so simple to be " Yogi " Jee !! Yogi under Holy Gita, Brother ! Dhanya Ho !! Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala ---------------------- Shri Hari The theory advanced by Venuji about incurring of sins, caused by change in mental chemistry is surprising. Almost each of his concepts need a thorough re-orientation. Good that he has reached here somehow. Let this soul get direction. Shyama Chhangani ------------------------ Mr Venu ! It is my feeling that the observations, the logic, the theories advanced in your note have not been influenced by sadhak messages in this forum, such as the discussion on " Vasudeva Sarvam " " Divine is everywhere " . Let us all be open to listening to new ideas and being brief in our own usage of words and experience the divinity in this forum! Regards Khan Jarsingh ------------------------------- My Salutations to all in this forum Interesting, really very very intersting !Will experienced and learned sadhaks clarify in detail as to whether the theories so painstakingly advanced by Mr Venu K. are correct ? I have not so far during my 6/7 month association with this forum come across concepts as such. I am more interested in his theory regarding sins and his interpretation that nicely/skillfully/cleverly executed actions make a person " yogi " under Gita. If that is so, then I think it is very simple to be " yogi " and a lot of humanity gets covered by this definition. Does Gita confirm that when expectations are not met, there are changes in the brain chemistry? Well, yes, it is difficult to establish re birth. I am eagerly looking forward to deliberations. Please also explain what is this " vaadibhi " and " darshibhi " and Gitacharya stated by Mr Venu ? Thanks Luca B --------------------------- Dear Sadhaks > > Amazing and novel theories put forward nu so laboriously 1. Theory of Rebirth 2. Theory reg Poulation increase 3 Yoga under Gita 4. Practicing vis a vis talking about Gita - need for practical living of Gita 5. Theory reg change in brain to initiate sinful conduct 6.. Mind vs Belief . Mike Keenor please clarify your response as it appeared somewhat vague. Thanks, Audrey Rodrigues ------------------------- PRIOR POSTING -Shree Hari- Dear Venu Komanduri, Firstly I will reiterate what I first quoted: Yoga Aphorism Concentration II 39 : When he is fixed in non-receiving he gets the memory of past life. Swami Vivekananda made no bones about, it he said the memory of past life is the first power a yogi obtains. Now you can say all of this is lunacy, that really is fine by me. Lord Krishna told Arjuna about the reality of rebirth/past life. Chapter 2 Even as a man casts off his worn-out clothes And then clothes himself in others which are new So the embodied casts off worn-out bodies And then enters into others which are new. (22) Of that which is born, death is sure, Of that which is dead, birth is sure. Over the unavoidable, Therefore you never should lament. (27) Chapter 4 The Holy Lord said: Many the births that I have passed– Many passed by you, Arjuna. I have full knowledge of them all, While you do not, Scorcher of Foes. (5) Many more examples, I am not sure how one rationalizes this to mean something else. Actually I will tell you something, if you apply fierce logic in your quest, not backing away from your task to be at one with the universal truth, then all your questions will melt away, but hold onto your hat! 'It is by means of their actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives.' With all due respect your water bottle analogy is like comparing, sardines to bananas. Looking at the logic of the water analogy no mater what form or where those molecules go, they remain those molecules. Now the eternal self is not mega water molecules, but the individual eternal soul, that may become part of the whole plain of oneness but remains like a water molecule that one individual, just like the one water molecule now in the ocean is existent for all of existence. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike (Keenor). --------------------------- Dear sadaks, Sri Venu Komandurisays-- Bagavan suggests tattva darsibhi is better and there is NO appeal. !08 upanashids mentions here and there that it (Upanashids) unable to describe GOD. They why strain on tattva vadibhi. By sticking and practicing SAT? Means deataching to objects and emotions, strongly knowing in mind the dear and near can collapse any time, one came alone and goes alone, all things on earth is only visible by Maya, amount of input of attachment is sorrow of same amount later, Maanusha degam Dullabam, just pretend that one is affectionate, attached, caring and perform actions (karmas) only at body level, always in Anniyachitha of Bagavan. Talking about SAT one has abosolutely NO knowledge how IT is. Can just say what imagined or very little known. One does not see Air but can feel. God is very clearly said HE is Apprameyam. Means no pramanam, not object, cannot be seen or felt by any human senses. Then HIS sankalpa to take a form and show us HIS vision. In Srimat Bagavat it is very clear about GOD told by Elephant Gajendra- HE is AKKILA KARANAM, ARPUTHA KARANAM, NISH KARANAM. May be it contradictory but has wonderful message that is said in Bagavath Geetha Transition- Like birds migrating from one place to other. Like changing cloths. In Saffire dress or Pyjama, or suit you are the same person. When Jeva leaves it takes with it it`s own Karmas, Vasanas, Dana & Dharm, Paapa & Puniya etc that was experienced on earth and NOTHING materialistically from earth. In case Jeeva leaves without anything said above, it travels on Archanathi Marg northern side of earth and reaches Paramathuma. Jai Sri Krishna B.Sathyanarayan ----------------------- Venuji, please clarify your perspective. In my eyes there appear to be vaccilation between belief and mind. Thakurlingam ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear sadaks, Once soul leaves the body, it takes nothing of worldly things is the meaning. A crorepathi on death can never carry with him anything, even his body except his own cause and effects (Karmas). Of course many has seen GOD in the past. But we never believed them. We insulted them as " Chitta Brama " . We never knew their Chitta was with Brama. Mother Andal in SriRangam has seen God. Thrirupan Alwar, Nandanar, Kannaper, Samartha Ramadoss, Bradrachalla Ramadoss, Shridi Sai Baba, Ramana Rishi, Sri Ramakrishna Paramahamsa showed God to Vivekanath. Paramathuma is NOT object has been discussed so many times. HE is to be known through Gyana/Bakthi. In Srimath Bagavath it is said that Bakthi Maatha unable to wake up her 2 children Gyana and Virag as Kali was Born. For a person with poorna faith, he can see God in many. For a person with distrubed & uncertain faith, even if God appears he will start thinking whether it is illusion, just like Duryodan saw Viswaroop. For Valmiki with years of Ram Naam Ant hill covering him, never lost faith. Fraction of faith lost, will show no any results. Though in Bible, the example is nice. Christ was walking on water. A disciple also wanted to walk on water. Christ said come. He walked on water. But as he was waliking on water, a doubt came in his mind , " What if I sink " . He sank. Christ said to disciple, " When you lost faith- faithlessness sank you " . Sri Ragavendar Swamy in his teen age gave food to Sri Krishna Idol which never ate. He profusly cried to extent of fainting, Sri Krishna came and ate. So was in case of Namadev. Mother Yasoda said today I will tie up Krishna. She tried with a rope and it was getting short of 2 Inches. When she surrendered to Sri Krishna saying with love,' Oh Krishna I cannot tie you. Bagavan gave HIS hip to be tied. Bakthi (physical surrender), intellect (Mind surrender), faith (Budhi Surrender) known as Trikarna Sudhi, Bagavan appears in the form you desire. Purpose of this forum is to impart Gyana so that one can see God. Guru (this forum) shows the way, it is up to one to catch up fast with faith. Have faith on a stone, Bagavan appears. Jai Sri Krishna --------------------------- Dear Sadhakom There is a hot response for my posting. Thank you all for giving me an opportunity to explain what I said and try to answer your questions. Before that I want to mention 3 of points here: (a) We all who participated in this posting believe in God, I believe we differ in how we perceive God. I do not see and do not expect you would see this as an anomaly as we are all seeking the same target in different paths (types of yoga). (b) All sadhaks may not be at the same level of sadhana and making spiritual progress at same speed. I may be at basic level and you may be at advanced stages. There is no measure to it. © Please show tolerance / constraint to different view points – when you have 6 billion people, they all could be different. Being in the advanced stages, a sadhak will show more constraint towards others (I do not need to read or quote from Gita for this simple fundamental on human relations) Since our moderator advised brevity, I will try to follow the same, but cannot be sure of the same: I studied Gita (mainly the first 7 chapters repeatedly and others once) and was relating many of the down-to-earth messages of Gitacharya to my own personal life to remove tensions, developing relationship with my fellow citizens around and writing my own observations in a dairy. When I joined this forum, the topics postings suggested to me the sadhaks are in advanced stage of saadhana. As I went through the communication, I was not clear on some statements from the sadhaks connected with postings like `samaadhi / moksha', expressions like `soul leaving body' if they have visualized these states and responding. If I were you I would not venture to answer the posting like on samaadhi vs moksha, without experiencing both the states. So my posting was to get some clarity on the practice / examples own experiences. Mike – I understood your writing then and now the same way, no disagreement with you on it. I only brought an additional point, in support of viewing Gita from different angles. Gita is neither directly nor indirectly suggesting us to switch off our brains. Use our skills and intellect, question our way up so we may progress and make the progress in a best way – is what I meant by `yogah karmasu kousalam', is also stated in Gita again as `muktasanjna karma samaacharh'. On rebirth, let me know how the following contradicts Gita? God is of many forms. For simplicity of understanding, let us say divine (purusha or Lord) form and non-divine form (prakriti – Nature). If I consider divine form as a divine ocean (water), man takes birth as the water enters into a bottle. Water + bottle(B) = man. There could be different men B1, B2, B3 etc.We identify the characteristics of the bottle (the color, the shape) to water also, so we see different men (with different colors and shapes). When death arrives, bottle breaks and water gets back to the ocean. After death, there is no B1, B2 and B3, right? It is all gone back to divine form (to God). In ocean you do cannot trace the water thrown back. There will be births from the ocean, but nothing cannot be called `rebirth'. Sorry I cannot prove it, no way different from that you cannot prove rebirths – other than believing our scriptures. Its 50: 50 chance, right? But see this: If rebirths are to be accepted as the fact (other than just belief), there has be to be 1:1. (I am taking India as an example here) How come the population exploded from 350 million to about 1000 million in about last 35 years and not before? Are we to assume that more living beings are transmuting to human beings now? I am not suggesting the above is truth, but a view point. I am open to criticism here, but be logical in what you say. Man has to pay for his own karma in this birth itself that is very much evident. If I negligently drive the car, I am sure to make accidents. Gita warns us to be more responsible and be skillful in our actions or karma. Again like I said I am focusing on Gita messages which are down-to-earth, I am not there yet where I have experienced God in every human being and treated them the same way, no I am not there yet. Vyasji At the times Gita was documented, our ancestors do not have as much writing / editing tools that have today. They have documented what has been practiced by many for 100s of years before in a very brief manner. That is the reason there are so many written commentaries about same one Gita from different great people later and there could be other reasons also. Different perspectives!! God has given man intellect and an area of independence. Within that area man has the control and beyond it others, society, nature and God. We need to use that to the fullest extent before seeking help from God. This is not `egoism', this is use of the God-gifted assets. Use intellect and do karmas skillfully, but do not desire the fruits. Desire for fruits causes expectations, microscopic changes in brain. These changes are waiting forces (papas or sins) which will spring up, when the expectations are not met, causing uncontrollable emotions for men. Is that not a rational? Is that not what our modern psychology saying? 1000s of years after Gita said the truth!! The more I see the rationality behind Gita messages, the more my admiration grows to Gitacharya. Your question on rebirth, hut and palace, difference between children of same parents. Hut and palace – how is this connected with a rebirth? If parents are wealthy, children are born in palace. By your statement, you believe that who are born in huts have done (sins), in palace have done virtues (Punya). Do not you see that is just chance but not karma? If so, how come Gandhi is not born in a hut chooses to live in huts to be close to common man? Obama, born of a poorman, now is US president. Gandhi is great because he made great karmas, not because he was born great!! Accidents – since you believe in karma, you asked such question. Did you every try blindly running across a heavy traffic of cars? You would not and I would not, because we know it is not safe, nothing to do with past life karma. Same thing with accidents. To answer your questions, when accidents happened more people died when they did not wear safety helmets / safety belts. If your statement has to be true, we do not need courts to punish criminals, because every task is governed by past life karma. Sorry about it!! Difference in children of the same parents - it is all due to DNA – genetic. If you are interested and want to be rational, you can search internet on `DNA', you will get tons of information. I did not understand your question on Krishna, sorry so I cannot answer the same. Critical examination – this word may have pained you and may be others also, I apologize if it did. That's what happens when our beliefs are hurt. I went through this painful experience when I read `Indian Philosophy' by former Indian President S.Radhakrishnan, which talks about how the 6 systems of Indian philosophy have originated, scriptures – Vedas, Upanishads and epics were (and what times) compiled. My beliefs to perceive God in human form (like Vishnu, Shiva etc) was deeply hurt. However, I had go through that pain and overcome that to now have broader belief system. Please do not be under the impression that `critical examination' is going aginst a system or philosophy. Its mindset to probe and ask questions to gather more information about whatever you do /read or study. I am not saying `right' information. Certain things do not sound logical and need deep understanding / reading of other books. Lot of people will be surprised to know that Indian geometry (mathematics) originated from or for `aagama' shastra. (To know more about it type `sulabha sutras' in Google). And now we know that sciences originated and proliferated into many branches from mathematics. So when I read Gita or other puranas, I cannot switch of my rationale if there are some questions around it. I do not think our ancestors expected that too. If so, I am wondering if so many commentaries on Gita or other scriptures are necessary. Shasaikalaji You talked about `luck' and it depends on how define `luck'. Take a minute and try to define the word `luck' or see a dictionary. We use this word in general, whether we believe in it or not, even I use it and I do not believe in it. There is positive way of having `luck' and conventional way of using it. If some one gets lottery or promotion or money, we say `he is lucky'. Is that what you mean? I consider I am lucky when I read a nice poem in `bhagavatam' that God gave me a mind to enjoy to my fullest extent. Can a billionaire enjoy that poem as much as I do if God has not given him that mind (bank balance does not change it). He can buy a top model car/ building, not the mind. He has to use his own, good or bad. Holy Gita, Ramayana or Bharata – God never said follow everything blindly. When it occurs to your brain, even if it is Vedas, Upanishads, please do have question on that, but most obediently, so the beliefs are not hurt. Your questions enrich your belief, like I explained in my note to Vyasji. Energy comes to us when we are open to criticism and same way we lose energy when we react negatively to a criticism. We are human beings with emotions. So being a science student is not that I am a scientist or any big person, the tendency to be inquisitive. Mind and belief – Can you define `mind' for me? Its is difficult, of course, our dictionaries provide definition, you can say it a `collection of thoughts, feelings and emotions'. Your beliefs come out of your `mind' and are an intense emotion. Belief is one you think is right (whether that is right or wrong for society or others). You may derive the knowledge your belief from books, parents, society and they are likely to change naturally or by force. I believe that `Vaada' is very important aspect of learning and being open about `vaada' is equally important too, I would encourage you to read the chronology of Indian scriptures, so we will have a better perspective of how much our ancestors struggled to store their wisdom for us, how they transmitted the same through generations. Sorry I took lot of your time/space, Moderatorji!!! Venu Komanduri SUMMARY OF SADHAK RESPONSES Ram Ram - No scripture recommends only tattva-vada (reading/discussing only) - Interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! - Sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal. It addresses principles and practice of ideal human conduct. All issues can be addressed. - As clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner, clarity increases - " tattva darshibhih " remain only SAT (Existence) - " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16) - Sadhak is to be tattva darsibhi (by living/practicing 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). - It is no about simply waiting for God to do. - It is by means of sadhak's actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. - The great souls, these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. - Surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan and all vasanas will be eradicated - Bhagwan will reveal himself to his children and bring his children together in the way they resort to Him. - Have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for yourr life (lessons from other pilgrims) - Implementing Gita teachings - KEY to betterment - Practices Gita in one's life probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion - Yes! one has to " live " Gita principles. There is no doubt, No contradiction. - Without cause-effect (rebirth), what causes such inequanimity in births, situations, circumstances etc.? - Critical Examination of Gita/God, is it possible? - Paramatma is not easily conquerable by our critical thinking etc. - Aren't Mind / Belief opposite / separate subjects altogether? - No need to believe in theories, believe your own experience - God and His creation are all one - WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life. KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFEBELT - GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. - THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth. Ram Ram ---------------------------- NEW POSTING -Shree Hari- Dear Venu Komanduri, Thanks for your comments on my post. I like to mention to you at first, that I have spent my whole life in the field of electronics, logic was one of my favorite subjects. There came a time in my life when logic, and common sense were confounded. (You will have to take my word on that, there will be hundreds of sadhaks who will understand what I am saying). Actually I was putting the opposite spin on the common view, that is practicing intuitively, maybe from the inner conscience a way of life, searching all avenues for answer to the paradoxes of existence. One must remember, there are many great souls in the world who have never heard of the Bhagavad Gita, and when they come across it they are amazed. Analize carefully what I wrote: 'It is by means of their actions by their morality and their love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives.' I really do not think I implied one should await for GOD, if it appeared that way I apologize. B.G. 11: Prostrating in adoration, do I crave Forgiveness: as a father forgives his son, A friend his dear friend, and a lover his love†" Thus even so should You forgive Me, O God. (44 Overjoyed am I, seeing Your form, and yet My mind is distracted with terror. Show me, In mercy Lord, only Your previous form†" O Lord of gods, Abode of the universe. (45 Purely out of interest what do you make of that from a logical approach. You ask about transition, it can come slowly a gently path, or fierce and fast, like fire. But whatever, " You keep chopping wood, and fetching water " . B.G. 2: Attached to pleasure and power Their minds are drawn away by this Speech, and to them is not granted The insight from meditation. (44) The introspective ones I talk of, ponder meditate, these 'Pilgrims', prefer a quiet life, you know scientists, technocrats, woodchoppers, whatever, but they do not seek glory. To quote you: 'I do not trust in rebirth, saying that 'people suffer from the karma of previous births' Talking of Yogis, or Yogis to be: Yoga Aphorism: Concentration II: (39). When he is fixed in none receiving, he gets the memory of past life. B.G. 18 And even that man who hears this, Full of faith and free from scoffing, He, liberated, shall attain The happy worlds of the righteous. (71) Has this been heard, O Pritha’s son, By you with a one-pointed mind? Moreover, has the delusion Of your ignorance been destroyed? (72) Arjuna said: Yea, destroyed is my delusion, And I have gained my memory Through Your grace, and my doubts are gone. I am firm; I will do Your word. (73) I hope my friend I have answers some of your questions, I can only tell you the truth as I see it. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ---------------------------- Hari Om Dear Mr Venu It is great to note that your kind self respects Gita except some portions of it. I have few questions. Kindly oblige by replying to the same. Please use your rational/logical mind and sharp intellect while responding so that we may reap maximum benefits. What is that " cleverness " which you referred while giving your version of " yogah karmashu kaushalam " ? Since you don't believe in rebirth, hence by your logical and rational sharp mind/intellect/ego please enlighten us as to how one child gets born in a hut and another in a palace? Is it pure coincidence or there are some laws behind the same? Why one should abstain from evil conduct? Why not, at least when one is sure of death, one should reap maximum pleasure from the world , by whatever means, as there will no rebirth to pay for_ Since there are no sins/virtues accumulating? What/Who leaves a live body so as to make it a corpse? How come 2 children of same parents have differences, inspite of living in same environment? How come in an accident one survives while another does not? Your more learned views are also solicited on that " karma kanda/swarga bhog " verses of Gitaji referred by you. What according to you may be the reasons of Lord Krishna advising us not to fall prey to the enticement of Karma Kand of Vedas? You said Sir that Krishna lives in all beings. Can you enlighten us as to why and for what time and since when? " Critical examination of Gita " - what according to you makes that necessary? Who is qualified to conduct that examination? What should be the basis of such exercise? How it should be conducted- any yardsticks in your logical/rationale mind ? Your elaborate views are solicited for benefit of us all. Most of the Sadhaks in this forum , including me, have more belief than logic/rationale. Your association and contribution therefore should enrich us. May be in the end you also walk out richer too. I trust you will respond " positively " . Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Jai Hanuman Venuji Maharaj ! I noted your kind advice to our Brother Mike Keenor . I quote below the last para - Kindly elaborate as to what is this " belief " ? Being a science student yourself and luckily ( " luckily " -since you don't believe in rebirth etc-or you don't believe in " luck " also ?) you also have mind and sharp intellect. Naturally , therefore, you critically evaluate everything before any acceptance- even if that is Holy Gita. Then what is this animal called " belief " which you referred in your elaborate advice to Mike Bhaiyya? Where then, Jee, is space for " belief " in your critical/sharp/logical/rational/thinking/evaluating/analytical/energe tic as well as energy producing/imaginative mind and intellect? Are not mind and belief two different and opposite subjects altogether? Like North Pole and South Pole? Bolo Jee! Boliye Sir !! Waiting for a positive response, Jee. Namaste Jee Jee Jee Shashikala --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram What " rationale " what " critical exam " We think, God is that easily conquerable by us? by our rationale and critical examination? Until one realizes the a speck on nothingness that we are compared to God ...then and then only true knowledge will reveal itself (rather we will allow it to flow into us) . We are like that upside down bowl, when it is raining. Swamiji has given this example... that the rain is pouring equallly on all. What can God do if we chose to keep our bowl, upside down? He is equally accessible to all. No one is forcing one to believe. Let us believe in our own experience. All our lives we have been learning only from " cause and effect " no other reason. We avoid fire, because sometime or the other we felt the heat and knew it to be dangerous. We learn from our mistakes, because there is a consequence. There is a price to be paid. We don't need to believe in theories as Swamiji says, just believe in our own experiences(anubhav). Ram Ram ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om. Hinduism never never compels one to read Gita at any point of one's life. There may be crores of hindus pass by their birth without even looking at HOLY GITA. Krushna has never uttered a word that everyone should surely read GIta. Krushna has given us Gita not to just read it and please HIM!!!!!!! He has taken pity on each and everyone of us!!!! We really dont understand the birth cycle at all !!!!! TO Krushna is attached the Vishnu Maya and Krushna is OMNI PRESENT in PRACRUTHI (Nature) !!!! WIthout GITA's help and Guidance its not at all possible to cross this ocean of life !!!! We keep facing cyclone after cyclone and we get lost in this action of pracruthi (Nature) !!!! Some start losing faith in God as they are shaken as disaster after disaster ruin their life !!!! This continues till we surrender to Krushna and take Gita in our hand. Here comes a great change in our life as KRUSHNA GIVES US LIFE BELT ---GITA FOR OUR SAFETY. He explains in detail the dimensions of nature-pracruthi, what our body is made of, what our mind does, what our intellect does, what is SATH CHITH. He has taken great care to educate us on Sthira Bhuddhi, Ignorance and true knowledge. THIS KNOWLDGE IS TO BE USED IN OUR LIFE EVERY SECOND to cross this birth !!!!! So interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life is the purpose of GITA !!!! With regards, Usha Sridhar. ---------------------------- Hari Om Dear Sadhak Venu ! What is your question? I wonder if any sadhak contradicted what you mean to say ! Yes- one has to " live " Gita principles. How and where there is doubt on the same? Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B ---------------------------- Re:Tatwa vaadibhi to tatva darsibhi Venu Komanduri is absolutely right: the ultimate aim is tatva darsibhi, though tatva darsibhi may be the initial step towards that. If an individual gets too attached to discussions and interpretation on Gita, the focus on practice to become tatva darsibhi may be lost. And, when one practices Gita in one's life it is probably better done silently with introspection and patience without getting involved in dialogue or debate or discussion on Gita. I am sure God will help and direct you along the path. If you have learnt that God and His creation are all one, realize that by living your life on that principle even as you have to act as a person distict from others. Difficult. But I try this path hoping that one day God will ensure successful transition to Oneness. Basudeb Sen ---------------------------- Dear Sadhak Community There is a nice response from Mike Keenor, nice in the sense there is outpouring positivism. I approached Gita in many ways - scientific, athiestic and spiritual. From all the angles I see there is immense wisdom stored in Gita. Ever since I have been studying Gita, specially the last 2 years, I am amazed at the down to earth messages. So I remain on earth and talk about the practical messages clearly indicated, they are neither hidden nor hinted, in Gita. Being a science student and in engineering profession, I always question things / dictum before my mind sees the rationale behind them - be it Vedas / Gita or otherwise. There are many slokas in Gita that showers the life management principles even if I study them as an athiest - ignore the fruits of desires (twaktaphalam), live in the 9-holed town (navadwarava pure dehi). Only to say 'critical examination of any scripture' is utmost necessary, I quote from Gita ( 2:42, 2:43, 2:44 ) which suggested not get trapped by the 'karma kanda' /'swargabhoga' (the rituals and the pleasures of the heaven) in the early part of Vedas. That is being rational about the objective of Gita. Despite my strong faith and belief in Gita, I do not trust in rebirth, saying that 'people suffer from the karma of previous births', 'concept of sin / virtue' as account maintained by God or some power. No! I do not!! There can be many interpretations to those words / usages in Gita. Remember that though Gita was documented in 2nd century AD, the slokas were known even before 1500 BC. We are 3500 years from the source and its meaning. Mike - I like your positivism, but Gita is also suggesting 'yogah karmasu kousalam', the yogi (yogi-to-be) has to learn to perform tasks cleverly - meaning there is controllable part the sadhak has to do (not waiting for God's hand), wherever he cannot, he should seek help from others (remember God lives in all). For all this sport of activities, the energy comes from the positivism / belief / imagination /critical thinking /relating the messages to the practical difficulties of life. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram The KARMA issue will be addressed as a separate topic. Kindly stay with one topic and subject at hand. Gita Talk Moderators, Ram Ram ---------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Dear Venu Komanduri, B.G. 4 In whatever way they resort To Me do I thus reward them. It is My path which ev'rywhere All men follow, O Arjuna. (11). People the world over from many different faiths, or even non faiths, who started their journey so very long ago, who hear as it were the ringing of the sacred bells, and have a yearning in their hearts for the unknown Beloved, they feel that Love, they know it is there. Do you not think that Divine Krishna would not take his children by the hand and show them the way home, 'The last miles'. It is by means of their actions by their morality and there love, that Bhagwan will reveal himself to them. And these pilgrims have the courage to stand firm in HIS Divine presence, not even caring for their lives. Do you think HE would not bring his children together so they may find comfort, be supported and support others in Divine Forum. With Respect and Divine Love, Mike Keenor ----------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Wonderful dear Venu. In other words, you are telling us all to shut up! Yes that is very much required for any serious seeker. You are very right … no scripture recommends tattva-vada. Definitely, tattva-vada can be a potential plague … most often, it is better to be ignorant rather than being a tattava-vadin: Andhantamah pravishanti ye avidyaamupaasate | Tato bhuya iva te tamo ye u vidyaayaam rataah || But, … is there any other way toward becoming a tattva-darshin? Manasaivedamaaptavyam neha naanaasti kinchana || We have to retrace the same path in which we collected our garbage (ignorance and inertia) to remove the same – our minds and bodies. You know, the vaccine is in the very germ! We have to turn the same germ against itself to releive ourselves from our deseases. We are helpless but to indulge in this vada (fight with our own bodily and mental demands) to remove the ignorance and inertia harbored within. The darshana (attainment of peace) is an eventuality of the vada (the war within). No war … no peace! No war within is a suicide in other words … Tangste pretyaabhigacchhanti ye kechaatmahano janaah || One who persihes without fighting the ignorance and inertia harbored within is the worst of all suicides. Therefore, a true vada (a truthful fight against one's own ignorance and inertia - you may want to call the vaccine, Tattva Vimarsha) is very essential to attain The Peace (Tattva Darshana) … after all a war is a war … things can go wrong … but it is definitely better than a suicide … definitely better than being consumed by our own tendencies as time passes over rendering no resistance like a pashu … Off course, the vada has the most vicious side effect that it itself can become the biggest vasana … well, as far as one is cognizant of the vada and its vicuous side effects, it is good and … that is the only way. The clouds of our ignorance and inertia become thinner and thinner as our truthfulness in our Tattva Vada intensifies in our internal search for the truth (Vada should be pitched against one's own well- established stupidity NOT ON THE STUPIDITY WISHFULLY PERCEIVED IN OTHERS!). Clarity of the truth (Tattva darshana) naturally increases as the clouds of ignorance and inertia get thinner and thinner … it is an eventuality that we look forward to so that we can finally perform your wonderful suggestion – SHUT UP! Till then … let us poor things perform the ritual waging the war within. Once in a while, please keep peeping in to remind us that we really wage it only for the correct reason (to burn the ignorance within) and only on the correct targets (to uproot the inertia within). That is helpful. THANK YOU. Respects. Naga Narayana ------------------------------- Dear sadaks, Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' This is what Bagavan said to Arjuna. Bagavan said, " What is use of knowing all knowledge when I (bagavan) is right in front of you " . Means do not worry of Sadanas, Karmas, Scripts, knowledge on Sat etc when the SAT (bagavan) has comes. That is surrender with pure faith and love on Bagavan who will take care of all the good what knowledge could give and also eradicate all vasanas, Karmas by HIS sankalpa itself. We have been trying over several births and still landing here. But if Bagavan tries you, the there is no any obstacle to liberate. But if Bagavan wants to try one, then he must have Niskama Prema Bakthi, which Bagavan has said in Geetha. Jai Sri Krishna baiya sathyanarayan =========================================== Happy new year 2009 to all sadhaks Thanks for your co-operation and guide regarding Gita 2.16 pawan singhal -------------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The Q of Venuji had two facets. One re the object of this Satsanga Forum. While I am not in any way a Founder of this Forum but as I see there is a common thread binding all Sadhaks - Swamiji Shri Ramsukhdasji Maharaj and Holy Gita. The sphere of Holy Gita is unlimited and universal- beyond all faiths and religions- covering humanity at large. This forum is in my view at present " evolving " and the deliberations are getting divine and divine. We , in fact, can easily state that we are part of a Jnana Yagya within the meaning of Holy Gita. Hence I don't see any limitations on the scope of this forum. Since Holy Gita encompasses entire humanity , both principles and practice of ideal human conduct - I see nothing wrong in our addressing any type of problems faced by Sadhaks in their spiritual journey. All my personal views as one of the many Sadhaks of this divine group. Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Dear all , Yes , if we can implement the teachings of gita , in our day to day living , not only will it make life Less stressful , but more meaningful . After all we live in our communities and mingle / work / interact, so i Feel as long as we understand The true meaning (spirit of the message ) of the message sought to be Conveyed by the gita and try & Impact the same in our lives , things will be much better . In short ,what we want to be is better human beings , because only than can we be better Parents / children / friends / spouses /sadhaks / teachers/ Rgds Arvind Malhotra ---------------------- PRIOR POSTING Hari Om The very existence is " SAT " . Those who have experienced the characteristics of " SAT " and ever changing function of nature- " ASAT " , they in practice experience " their obvious , self proven, natural, automatic positioning in the existence viz SAT . In their experience there is nothing known as ASAT existing. In other words in their experience only SAT is existing- nothing else is existing. Such great people are called " tattva darshibhih " . In their experience only their positioning in SAT- imperishable, permanent, ever present existence- remains. Through that positioning they get highest rewards. In BG 2:16- the term " ubhayorapi " - represents " conscience " ! " Antah " - represents " element knowledge " !! " Drishtah " - represents " experience " !!! Meaning thereby that " conscience has transformed ( " transition " term as used by the questioner) in to the experiential knowledge and now what has remained is SAT - existence only! This is the highest state of Jnana Yoga!! The Highest reward! Jai Shree Krishna Vyas N B --------------------------- Shree Hari Ram Ram " The unreal has no existence. " (Gita 2:16). Swamiji has been very clear about this... " Real " (Sat) is our natural state. Natural is what needs no effort. It is ever attained. It simply IS. Be situate in it. The essence (Real) is always there - will always be there. The real is not created. The unreal is created from the Real, stays in the real and then merges in the real. It has no existence of its own. One has to simply give importance to ones own experience. No need to believe in the scriptures. Your existence always IS. What is NOT can never exist. The IS always remains IS. To experience 'I AM', no effort is required. No practice. There is no doubt of our existence. The real essence is our existence. The base, the foundation of all appearance - of all creation. That is Paramatma (Supreme Consciousness,God). Meera Das Ram Ram ---------------------------- This is the sanest stuff I heard in a while! Hare Krishna! Gurunath Prakash ------------------------------ ORIGINAL QUESTION Dear Sadhak Community (1) Is the purpose of this forum only to discuss the meaning behind Gita slokas? and / or (2) interpreting the slokas or the spirit behind them to lead a peaceful practical life? (By practical life, I mean one living the normal life while in the quest for God, Gita does not shun the karma, but the attachment towards it) While I understand both are important, Gita is directing its readers like us to grow from Tatwa vaadibhi (one who reads and discusses about the essential element) to tatva darsibhi (one who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat'). I am particularly and practically interested in this transition, because some of the comments from my fellow sadhaks like 'then the soul leaves the body','everything has nothing, while nothing has every thing' while the same people are also suggesting 'no one may have seen God' 'Tatvadarsibhi' (who sees or practices the knowledge / 'sat') is referred in Gita 2:16 of Sankhya Yoga. Geetha charya suggests in this sloka the sadhak to be tattva darsibhi (by sticking / practicing to the 'sat') rather than being tattva vadibhi (talking about the 'sat'). There is no direct reference to 'tattva vaadibhi' here. Let me know your views on the transition. Regards Venu Komanduri ---------------------------- ---------------------------- GITA TALK GROUP GUIDELINES: 1. Purpose of the group is to help Sadhakas clarify their doubts related to Gitaji shalokas. Therefore, responses which further clarify the understanding of Gitaji, will only be posted. 2. Wherever possible, please quote Gitaji or other scriptures to substantiate your response. 3. Kindly limit personal feelings, opinions, beliefs etc. to the extent that they further help in understanding the Gita shlokas 4. Please be as concise and to the point as possible, respecting sadhaka's time. 5. Kindly focus your writing to the subject at hand only. 6. Please do not include links to the other sites or other organizations. 7. Kindly do not include your personal information such as phone number, address etc. 8. Please do not address the response to a particular individual since the message is going to the entire group. 9. Due to the large readership, all responses may not be posted. 10. Moderator at his discretion, may modify the posting, if content is unclear or not appropriate for distribution to the group. 11. Please respond taking into consideration the novices, youth, westerners, non-sectarian audience. Kindly limit the use to Sanskrit words only, rather provide the English word with Sanskrit bracketed wherever possible. MODERATOR Ram Ram ------------------------ Post message: Subscribe: - Un: - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.