Guest guest Posted April 7, 2010 Report Share Posted April 7, 2010 SrI: SrImathE Gopaladesika manahadesikaya nama: Dearest all, Continuing on our pastime of enjoying Bhagavad Raamanuja vaibhavam: [as part of our series and service to Srivaishnavas to commeomorate the 1000th year (2017)] Since Ramanuja considers himself as eternal servant to SaguNa brahmam, who is anantha kalyANa guNArnavan; akila hEya prathyaneekan [ocean of all auspicious attributes and devoid of any defects or imperfections] , Amudhanaar praises Acharya’s feeling of dAsa dAsathvam towards BhAgawathAs. When looking and analyzing at the surface level nirguNa brahmam, it would be considered merely as lack of proper understanding only- blesses Amudhanaar. pEthaiyar vEthap poruLithen Nnunnip piramamn^anRen ROthimaR Rellaa uyirum aqthenRu uyir_kaLmeyvit taathip paranoton RaamenRu chollumav vallalellaam vaathilven Raan,em iraamaa Nnuchanmeym mathikkatalE. 58 the verse of Iraamaanusa nOORRanthAthi Other religions wrongly provide a distorted interpretation of Vedic statements. They think, understand and explain with some logic (taking one statement and misread to comprehend out of context, and ignoring another statement from sruthis) that Brahmam is JIvAthmA and jIvAthmA is Brahmam; mOksham is equivalent merging of jIvAthmA with SarvEshawaran; illusion; false etc.. Such vociferous, disharmonious noises of wrong, misinterpretations and vibharItha jnAnams were completely silenced by the excellent arguments of Sri Ramanujacharya, quoting Vedas (declaring that jIvAthmA(chit) and the prakriti (achit) is also Nithyam and are eternal; They are eternally bonded to Brahamam with a SarIra SarIri bhAvam. Sriman NarAyaNA, the Lord of KalyAna guNas, is the sarIrI and all chit & achit are His sarIrA. Sriman Narayanan is the Master (sEshi) and all jIvAthmAs are sEshans (servants) and mOksham for jIvAthmA is having an uninterrupted Bhagavad anubhavam and performing eternal kainkaryam to the Lotus feet of Divya Dampati at SrivaikunTam, with great bliss). He stood victorious. It is his mercy on us for such great upakaaram to us (and Vedas too!) Ramanuja is mey mathi kadal- He says: everything is TRUE- the world, the beings and also the Brahmam and His kalyANa guNAs. All vedic statements are TRUE; etc.. One can not interpret some vedic statements and declare the doctrine and reject other statements. According to Sri Ramanujacharya, which he has expounded simply based on his predecessors, Swami Nammazhwar, Swami Sri Nathamuni, Sri Yamunacharya et al: the Ultimate Reality though One, is NOT the Absolute without any differentiation and not without any guNAs, or attributes, since such a undifferentiated Transcendental Being is inconceivable and also logically untenable. We have to admit the reality of the Universe, with which we are surrounded and also of the individual beings [jeevathmas] which experience the external world. Accordingly, Ramanuja acknowledges three fundamental real entities – matter [achith], soul [chith], and Supreme Reality [God or Iswara]; - and on the basis of organic relation, called Sareera Sareeri bhAvam, upholds that ultimate Reality is one as a Unity. As Vedantha Desika in nyAya sidhaanjanam says: Brahmam alone as organically related to the entire chith [jeevas] and achith [matter] is the One Ultimate Reality. [asEsha chith achith prakaaram brahmaikamEva thatthvam] Though there is absolute difference between God and the other two entities [beings and matter], and also among the individual souls [jeevathmas- chith] and matter [achith], the Ultimate Reaility [iswara] is considered as One because as Sareeri [Organic entity] having these beings and matter as Sareera, He is One. In this sense, [sri SMS Chari Swami says] the system of Vedantha expounded by Ramanuja is described as VisishtAdvaita which means oneness of the organic unity [visishtasya advaitam]; Thus Ramanuja not only expounded this vaidika religion; He also proved that other doctrines that are avaidika are only illusions and misinterpretations of Upanishads. Hence he is the ocean of truthful jnAnam [mey mathi kadal]. It is to be noted that the term VisishtAdvaita was not used by Ramanuja in any of his works. It was latter adopted by his followers and successors based on Swamy Desikan’s definition in Nyaya siddhanjanam. Acharya Saarvabhouman Thiruvadigale saranam Regards namo narayana dAsan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.