Guest guest Posted December 1, 1999 Report Share Posted December 1, 1999 Dear KP: Let us understand this substance-attribute relationship in itself and then bring in the visheSha factor. To begin with, you have to ask yourself the question as to whether the relation between substance and attribute is an internal one or an external one. If the former, you would agree with the Madhva tradition (which you don't). If external (which is what it would have to be since V'advaita says that substance and attribute are different), then the relation would have to be samavAya as samyoga (which takes places ONLY between substances) is ruled out. Since the relation is samavAya, V'advaita would have no right to criticize the NyAya-VaisheShikas. It would be like the " pot calling the kettle black " . Secondly, there are two types of identity: a) absolute identity (atyantAbheda) b) " colorful " identity (savisheShAbheda) What Dvaita VedAnta does is to accept not only the first type (tho' not in the Advaitic sense) but the second also to explain the substance-attribute relationship. By internalizing the issue to the constitution of the substance thru visheSha, Dvaita VedAnta has avoided the pitfalls of samavAya. It further avoids infinite regress on visheSha by claiming it to be svanirvAhaka. If visheSha is not accepted: 1. How could one account for harmony of attributes? 2. How could one account for the temporary focus on one attribute to the temporary obscuration of the others? 3. How could one account for not only the apparent distinction between substance and attribute but between the attributes themselves? 2. The visheSha of the NyAya-VaisheShika system and Dvaita VedAnta are quite different. The notion of visheSha in the N-V system is the principle of differentiation and individuation between one substance/entity and another. In Dvaita VedAnta, this is not necessary as differentiation is already embedded within the constitution of every entity. This is known as svarUpabheda. The concept of visheSha in Dvaita VedAnta is thus used to explain the seeming difference where none exists and to harmonize the attributes within a substance. regards, ShrInivAsa-SamIra smaraNa Hebbar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.