Guest guest Posted May 18, 2000 Report Share Posted May 18, 2000 hari saRvOththamma, vAyu jIvOththamma shrI hayagrIvAya namaha QUESTIONS & ANSWERS CONTD: Sri Subba Rao: Swamiji, in this Suthra Bhasya, one who made the statement that jeeva is brahma, that jeeva is antharyami is jnaanees who has paramarthika view point, one who made the final statement (Sidhdhantha), that jeeva is antharyami, i.e. Sidhdhanthi is ajnanee & he has vyavaharika point of view. Such peculiar situations may not be found anywhere else. If there is, kindly show me a famous one. Srigalavaru: Yes, consider Sankara Bhasya under Suthra Eakshatherna Sabdham (B 85) " According to Sankhya philosophy, the object represented by the word Sath in " Sadheva Somyedhagra Asseth " Shruthi is pradhana (Jadaprakruthi) & the first statement (Purvapaksha) is that object is the creator of the world. Since Sankaracharya has to oppose this statement, & it is said that the " Thadhaikshatha " i.e. the object saw. The act of seeing cannot be performed by non living prakruthi but can be performed by a chethana, Brahma; hence Brahma is the creator of the world, not non living prakruthi. Sankaracharya decided like that. Then he felt the difficulty how can Nirguna Brahma performed the act of seeing. He has explained that he was only supposed non existing power of seeing in nirguna Brahma, therefore, it has not actually resulted in wrong decision (Apasidhdhantha). Sri Subba Rao: Swamiji, supposed (subject of illusion false) the act of seeing can be pradhana also, so why we should not say the object of the word sath is pradhana only & not Brahma? Srigalavaru: Your complaint cannot be solved. Please hear what they have to say. It is possible to mistake minister for a raja, but no one mistakes a meanial servant for Raja. Just as the supposed Royalty does not appear in a menial servant but is likely to occur in a minister similarly, the supposed act of seeing cannot occur by non living prakruthi, but can occur by Chethana Brahma. But this is a clever explaination & not a clear proof. Suppose that the minister & the commander do not have any good dress or anything else which a servant does not have, all of them would be in the same position & any one of them may be mistaken for the king or maynot be mistaken. In the present case, the non living prakruthi (Pradhana) & nirguna Brahma are on similar footing. Actually, if we consider further since we are seeing, numerous variations in Jada Prakruthi, it is more probable that an act of seeing may occur by pradhana. In this way, in their system, Purvapaksha is stated by ignorance & sidhantha also is arrived at by ignorance. Therefore, ancient people have said " Chodhyam va Parihare va kriyatham dwaitha bhasya ya, nahya dhwaithe sasthra chedhana " meaning all doubts & explaination have to take place in dhwaita bhava (Vyavahara dhrushti). About Advaita questions are in appropriate. Sri Subba Rao: Then how to arrive at Advaita? Srigalavaru: If you start arrive at Advaita, dhwaitha comes up, if you start establishing nirguna Brahma with proofs, the nirgunathva gets destroyed. Therefore, according to Sruthi " Avachanenaiva Provacha " . They understand " Maunamenaparamoththaram " , it is written in Sankara Bhasya that when the sishya asked the guru, the later kept mauna. Sri Subba Rao: Swamiji, it is recorded that when his student asked Budha dheva " what is the final truth " Budha dheva kept mum (adopted mauna). English people have said " It stands self condemned i.e. for their system they have accepted that there is no proof, & thus condemned it. Here also same thing has happened. Sri Sethu Rao: Swamiji, because dvaitha bhava comes up when one tries to arrive at advaita with proofs to avoid the contradiction of his own system, advaitha wiht proofs to avoid the contradiction of his own system, adwaitha has to adopt mouna. Then what is the use of lakhs of books (granthas)? Sri galavaru: All your questions of today should be addressed to the Advaitha granthakaras. According to their system, all are waste. Sri Subba Rao: Swamiji, do they also say so? Srigalavaru: They say " Siddhantha Nivartha KAthavath " i.e. our system even though it may not establish advaitha by proofs, it removes the illusion of dhvaithabhava. Therefore, our shastra is fruitful. This is only a clever statement not a convincing argument. Without establishing advaitha, dvaithabhava cannot be removed. Next question is how this illusion came & for whom. According to Sruthi " Asangohyam purushaha " . Brahma is jnani svarupa & untouched by ignorance. Hence he cannot have any illusion. They say there is no satisfactory reply for this question. The answer looks beautiful, but if one starts practising, sadhana on that basis, he will meet with many difficulties. Sri Subba Rao: Swamiji, from the lectures so far heard, it is clear because the difference between jeevas & Brahma has been stated in Sruthies like " Ya athmani thisten " Jeeva is a bhinnamsa of Brahma. This has been established. THen why it should not be said that the collection of chethanas like Brahma is the parabrahma vasthu? Srigalavaru: By collection do you mean a mixture like that of grapes, almonds, sugar candy etc. or a compound like honey formed by essence of many flowers collected by bees? Sri Subba Rao: We say it is like the mixture of grapes & almonds. Srigalavaru: This means your saying that a collection of a number of chethanas were present at the time of pralaya. But all these chethanas were present at the time of pralaya. But all these chethanas cannot become parabrahma because according to shruthies " yatho va yimani bhuthani jayanthe " . " Ya athmani thishten Antharyomayathi? for all jeevas there is only one creator & among the jeevas, there is only one antharyami over lord- controlling the jeevas. Therefore, the overlordship comes to only one you have to agree with this. Even though there are many people in Government Maharajais the only overload & controller. similarly, Narayana who is different from all others is the only Parabrahma (Sarvoththamvasthu). Sri Subba Rao: Swamiji, then it can be said that the collection of all the chethanas like brahma is a compound like Honey. Srigalavaru: This is the worst suggestion. If such a compound is brahma when chethanas like Brahma come out of the compound, the compound will undergo many changes & finally get destroye.d That means there will be no parabrahma at all. Moreover from this suggestion, it means that parabrahma is born by the joining of many chethanas, & does not mean that chethanas have come out of parabrahma. When calcium carbonate (sunnakallu) & water join, calcium oxide (sunna) is born. What you call hydrogen & oxygen go together to form water. But sunnakallu cannot be born form sunna unless water itself gets destroyed oxygen cannot com out of water. Sri Subba Rao: Swamiji, why we should not say that before creation, there was a compound parabrahma during creation, it broke up, all the chethanas came into existence. Now there is no parabrahma. Srigalavaru: Paramathma is permanent (Nithya) changeless (nirvikara). According to sruthi " Nirvikara Akharahasuddhaha " . Therefore all of you should do devotional meditation as Paramathma is permanent, does not undergo any change permanently pervading everything & he is controlling everybody & so become eligible for his grace. TO BE CONTINUED............................................................... Lectures on Bhaghavath Geetha (Dhwaitha Siddhantha Vaijayanthi) by H. H. Sri Sathya Dhyana Thirtha Sri Padhangalavaru, Uttradhi Mutt Translated into English by Sri Krishnamurthy Published by Sri M. R. Krishnamurthy & Sri M. N. Gururaja Rao of Mumbai Printed at: Parishree Printers 100/3 Nagappa Street Palace Guttahalli Bangalore 5600 04 Telephone # (80)368286 All rights remain with Uttradhi Mutt, Basavangudi, Bangalore 560004 Permission was given to post it in this list by the Uttradhi Mutt authorities & by Sri SathyAthma Thirtha Swamiji of Uttradhi Mutt. Sri kRuShNARpanamasthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.