Guest guest Posted March 28, 2001 Report Share Posted March 28, 2001 Cont from /message/1597 Life is interspersed with misery and happiness. No living being has real happiness, except, perhaps a few among millions, who are jnaAni’s of high order. Scriptural authorities assert, that amidst death and destruction, life persists and souls regenerate. Logic cannot refute janmAntara or regeneration. The theory of karma is well accepted and acted upon by masses. All acts, karma of human beings, fall under one of the 3 categories – dharma, adharma and udAsIna – all of them having their phala which the doer has to experience at some time. Dharma generates punya which yields happiness; adahrma generates papa which yields misery; udAsInakarma accounts for the course of inconsequential acts. Every man is born with a specific bundle of karma to be worked out in that life, which determine his experience and activities. Adharma or its effect, pApa with which the present article is concerned, consists of different varieties and gradation of the same. The classification of sins and their atonement’s are described at length and explained illustrations in Sri Visnu Rahasya purAna. Every soul has to work out his spiritual goal in human body only. Animal bodies are not equipped with buddhi or viveka to distinguish between good and bad to act after making a decision. A wise decision is very essential to reach the goal of moksa, emancipation and eternal bliss. Past sins, particularly those committed in previous human bodies, leads one to a wrong path. Such sins could be rendered ineffective only by the grace of the Lord. It is therefore, the foremost duty of every man to understand how to His grace. This is made possible by serving a worthy guru and learning from him, His greatness and acquiring bhakti of steadfast and constant nature. To make full use of the unique gift of viveka, conferred on man, he must be pure in thought, word and deed. The instinctive moral sense would be vague and indistinct in problematic situations and therefore, a fairly good knowledge of vidhi and nisheda is very necessary; this again is made possible by the study of sAstrAs under the guidance of a guru. To be pure in thought, a control of the mind is essential and that is possible by constant practice (AbhAsya) and abstinence from sensual pleasures (vairAgyA). Sins are of different varieties and gravity. Naturally, the punishments therefore and the expiatory religious acts to be observed for the atonement varies greatly. These have been set out in detail in the smRtis: vAsiStha, pArA`sara, manu and the like. Sri Mdhva’s general classification of sins is highly instructive an useful for the sAdhakas. In his BhAgavata tAtparya he describes the 8 principle categories of sins and explains their implications at length. He illustrates them by example too. Minor sin – killing of ants and the like Sins – killing of animals with bones in the body; theft of fruits and the like Nearly a great sin – sexual connections with a parastri and the like Great sin – intentional killing of a man of sUdra caste and the like Very great sin – slaying a Brahmin and the like A very grave sin – misappropriation of properties of temple or mathAs A heinous sin – contempt or disrespect of divine beings, devatAs and Hari bhaktAs The most heinous sin – contempt or disregard of Sri Hari (avaj~nA) avaj~nA is explained at length, as every aspirant for moksa has to take care to avoid the most heinous sin which leads to andhatamas. SrimadAchArya says these thoughts and ideas amount to contempt of the Lord: Sri Hari has equals I am myself Hari BrahmA, RudrA, and other deities like mahAlakshmi are not different from Hari Sri Hari is nirguna All muktAs are HarisvarUpAh Sri Ahri has no body, or His body is materialistic He is subject to births and deaths He has ignorance & misery like all other living entities He has a superior Sri Madhva also illustrates the different grades of heinous sins by an example: A lustful look at another’s wife (parastrI) is ksudrapApa; sexual connection with her is upapAtaka; cohabitation with another woman outside the four castes is pAtakah forced intercourse with a woman enjoyed by one’s father is mahApAtakaH to look greedily at the wife of one superior to himself is sumahApAtakah; to cohabit with her is sumahattara-mahApAtakaH to covet the company of a person who covets the wife of a deity (devastri) is a heinous sin and is worse to do so himself When this is so, what can be said of desiring the company of Sri Vshnu’s consort? The use of the word ‘stri’ used in this context is symbolical and stands for mithyAj~nAna and visayAsakti (attachment or addiction to sensual pleasures). False knowledge about God and the world is accepted by tAmasic souls and therefore mithyAj~nAna and is also called yosit and it attracts and seizes them – they love it and it possesses them. To be continued… ===== (617)442-8985(617)598-1031 X 1054 Get email at your own domain with Mail. http://personal.mail./?.refer=text Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.