something for us all to ponder

[Guest guest]

Dear Hari Bhakthas,

There are so many scholars who are members of this .

We all follow the teachings of Srimad Acharya. Let us make

our lives more fruitful, by not discussing things that

will end no where, the gyana and agyana of a person is

obsuletly according to their karma. Instead of the singing

glories of the various mathas and present pontiffs, i absolutely

agree, every pontiff coming in the lineage of every madhwa mathas must

be respected (but that does not mean singing glories) for the the

orgin of the matha, srimad acharya himself, let us sing the glory of

LORD HARI, VAYU,SRIMAD ACHARYA and great ethis like Jayatheertharu,

Vyasrajaru, Sri Padarajaru, Vadhirajaru,Vijayendratheertharu,

Raghavendraru and raghothma theertharu, who have immensly contributed

towards the dvaita sidhantha and srimad acharya's teachings. No other

community has seen such great scholars and great ethis like we have

in the last 700 years.This is a social group, which is dedicated to

the spread of srimad acharya's teachings and dvaita philosophy. There

are so many mathas in Madhwa community, if we keep on fighting about

the glory of the mathas, we will end up without realization of Lord

Hari and what srimad acharya has told us. Always remeber

every man has the right to choose his own guru, so the guru

one may respect may not be respected in the same way by other

individual. let us put the MATHAS behind us and purely follow

the teachings of srimad acharya and what our great madhwa ethis has

said. Great learned scholars in the mailing list please pardon

me if i have said anything in any way that may have offended the

teachings of srimad acharya. As i am writing this as a pure Hari

Bhaktha who would follow the teachings if Srimad Acharya.

 

In service of Hari, Varu and Guru Rayaru

 

, " Anand Manvi "

<m_anand_rao> wrote:

> Hi All,

>

> , <panchamukhi@v...> wrote:

> > We have had enough controversies over several issues which in no

> > way contribute to our understanding of Shri Madhwacharya's

> > philosophies.

> It becomes a contraversy only if one or both the parties hold on to

> their point of view irrespective of whether or not it's based in

> Shastras. Hiding Shastric knowledge for fear of 'contraversy' is

not

> always a benificial in the long run. Parties involved may need to

sit

> and have Shastric-vada and prove their(disprove other's) points,

> rather than trying to evole 'consensus'.

> This forum may very well ban such discussions as most of us(not me

> atleast) do not have the panditya/yogyata to make a point.

>

> The way Sri Madhva, who is infinitely alpa compared to Sri Hari,

> could prove that Sri Hari is sarvottma - a person who is much alpa

> compared to Sri Vadirajaru may be able to (dis)prove Rujutva of Sri

> vadirajaru, pureley on the basis sat-Shastra.

>

> For those who question 'What is the use of knowing whether or not

Sri

> Vadirajaru is Ruju or not?', I've a counter question 'What is the

use

> of knowing whether or not Sri Hari is sarvottama?'.

>

> Like some acharya noted in Sri Sudha magazine, wrong-knowledge is

> worse than no-knowledge. Wrong knowledge in this particualr

instance

> will affect the Taratamya and hence may lead us to andhanTamas

> instead of Vaikuntha.

>

> Personally, I've accepted Sri Sri 1008 Satyatmateertha Swamiji as

my

> swaroopa uddharaka guru and it's only through him that I can get

> sadgati, and whatever is his sat-shastric interpretation is for me

> too.

>

> Krishnam Vande Jagadgurum,

>

> Anand