Guest guest Posted July 29, 2003 Report Share Posted July 29, 2003 Vasu, 1.I did not send you any official emails on behalf of SRS Matha. All the emails which were sent by me where sent on behalf of myself and not SRS Matha mantralayam.Get that clear in your head. 2.I do not become an ADvaitain for questioning certain aspects of dwaitha due to ignorance or just because my name sounds like an non-madhwa? 3. For your info, I am a born Advaithi, but ever since i have had bhakthi on Guru Raghavendra, I have been living like a Madhwa, my website http://www.gururaghavendra.org reflects my orientation towards dwaitha sidhantha and I have been advocating Dwaitha to all Guru Rayar devotees through my website and mailing list(there are 1000+ devotees) irrespective of their religion, caste and creed. I have long grown apart from My Iyer Cult and I am much engaged in Propagating Acharya's Philosophies. So dare not call me an Advaithin. 4. Dont u ever think as A Rayar devotee, for a minute that Rayar is an ocean of patience and he will take care of those who harm his interests ? rememeber the Thomas Munroe incident when he protected Mantralayam from being annexed by The British Empire. 5. I dont live in Mantralayam, to pollute Mantralayam. 6. You are the one who is polluted, by calling me an advaithi in the disguise of a Madhwa you have proved that you only think of such cheap things as spying and suspecting one and all instead of propagating Srimad Acharya's philosophies. 7. So by calling me an Advaithi and assuming that you have given me a fitting reply did you gain any more gyana on Dwaitha or increase your bhakthi ? I am arguing on this list as well as working towards spreading gyana through my other Mailing List where only Bhathki and Gyana related material are posted. Finaly,like everyone pointed out why dont you, think creative, i.e posting about Rayar's works or information on Dwaitha , so others can benifit, rather than spying on Mathas to find out which swamiji is controlling which matha and which Matha official is doing what? you may ask why dont i do the same, i am doing this noble work on my mailing list, if you are interested you may see my posts there. Thanks Webmaster-www.gururaghavendra.org --- vasudevrao2003 <vasudevrao2003 wrote: > All, > > Few people have written to my personal box asking > for some > clarification. One particular individual who claims > to be > sending 'Official' mails from SRS Matha has used > abusive language for > which I gave fitting replay. I do not see why such > individuals should > be spared at all. Also this individual sounded to me > like an Advaitin > in the guise of a Madhva. Unfortunately there are > some such people > polluting Mantralayam too. > Nevertheless, as I mentioned earlier too, quite a > few people on this > list seem to be carrying some baggage or the other. > Most of you guys > remind me of Indian communist who claim to be > speaking against caste > but endup seeing and speaking caste and only caste > in anything and > everything. Also another striking similarity with > the secularists is > that you guys take no time in associating people > with that group or > this. Like one person asked me why only person from > Gautami gotra > should get SRS peetha!? What do I say? I never > supported this > ridiculous line of argument, but these > Madhva-secularists seem to > insist on getting answers. > You Madhva-secularists! step down from the > high-moral-pedastal and be > proper Madhvas. > > || Sri Moola Ramo Vijayathe || > || Sri Raghavendraya namh || > > Vasu > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2003 Report Share Posted July 30, 2003 OK guys, if you want to fight and show off your ego, kindly note this is not the place. Please keep it personal. When somebody tries to keep it personal, there is no need to come back to this list and try to " show " everyone that you are some kind of Medhavi and others are not. There are some young kids in this list who are trying to learn Madhwa sampradaya. Can you imagine what they might think seeing grown ups quarreling in a list meant for spreading Madhwa philosophy? Please try to set an example. You can always disagree with anyone and put forth your thoughts/opinions with decency. Why show ego? why get personal? Why get angry if someone disagrees? Why not listen to others? I feel sad writing this kind of email to a group of great scholars. Mr.Vasu (The moderator of this group, I hope fence is not eating crops, in my opinion, you should revoke the membership of those who get personal on this list. I believe the purpose of this group is not quarrelling. It is meant for something constructive. May be we need to come up with strict rules to obtain and keep the membership into this group. THIS NEEDS TO BE DONE ONCE AND FOR ALL. Also, lately there have been a load of emails unrelated to what this list is meant for. The individual is going one step at a time. I think that needs to be checked as well. Anybody disagrees with me and want to have a debate, you are more than welcome. But, please mail me directly and NOT TO THIS LIST. My two cents, Praveen --- Rajaraman Nagarajan <guru_rayar wrote: > Vasu, > 1.I did not send you any official emails on behalf > of > SRS Matha. All the emails which were sent by me > where > sent on behalf of myself and not SRS Matha > mantralayam.Get that clear in your head. > 2.I do not become an ADvaitain for questioning > certain > aspects of dwaitha due to ignorance or just because > my name sounds like an non-madhwa? > 3. For your info, I am a born Advaithi, but ever > since > i have had bhakthi on Guru Raghavendra, I have been > living like a Madhwa, my website > http://www.gururaghavendra.org reflects my > orientation towards dwaitha sidhantha and I have > been > advocating Dwaitha to all Guru Rayar devotees > through > my website and mailing list(there are 1000+ > devotees) > irrespective of their religion, caste and creed. I > have long grown apart from My Iyer Cult and I am > much > engaged in Propagating Acharya's Philosophies. So > dare > not call me an Advaithin. > 4. Dont u ever think as A Rayar devotee, for a > minute > that Rayar is an ocean of patience and he will take > care of those who harm his interests ? rememeber the > Thomas Munroe incident when he protected Mantralayam > from being annexed by The British Empire. > 5. I dont live in Mantralayam, to pollute > Mantralayam. > 6. You are the one who is polluted, by calling me an > advaithi in the disguise of a Madhwa you have proved > that you only think of such cheap things as spying > and > suspecting one and all instead of propagating Srimad > Acharya's philosophies. > 7. So by calling me an Advaithi and assuming that > you > have given me a fitting reply did you gain any more > gyana on Dwaitha or increase your bhakthi ? I am > arguing on this list as well as working towards > spreading gyana through my other Mailing List where > only Bhathki and Gyana related material are posted. > > Finaly,like everyone pointed out why dont you, > think creative, i.e posting about Rayar's works or > information on Dwaitha , so others can benifit, > rather > than spying on Mathas to find out which swamiji is > controlling which matha and which Matha official is > doing what? > you may ask why dont i do the same, i am doing this > noble work on my mailing list, if you are interested > you may see my posts there. > > > Thanks > > Webmaster-www.gururaghavendra.org > --- vasudevrao2003 <vasudevrao2003 wrote: > > All, > > > > Few people have written to my personal box asking > > for some > > clarification. One particular individual who > claims > > to be > > sending 'Official' mails from SRS Matha has used > > abusive language for > > which I gave fitting replay. I do not see why such > > individuals should > > be spared at all. Also this individual sounded to > me > > like an Advaitin > > in the guise of a Madhva. Unfortunately there are > > some such people > > polluting Mantralayam too. > > Nevertheless, as I mentioned earlier too, quite a > > few people on this > > list seem to be carrying some baggage or the > other. > > Most of you guys > > remind me of Indian communist who claim to be > > speaking against caste > > but endup seeing and speaking caste and only caste > > in anything and > > everything. Also another striking similarity with > > the secularists is > > that you guys take no time in associating people > > with that group or > > this. Like one person asked me why only person > from > > Gautami gotra > > should get SRS peetha!? What do I say? I never > > supported this > > ridiculous line of argument, but these > > Madhva-secularists seem to > > insist on getting answers. > > You Madhva-secularists! step down from the > > high-moral-pedastal and be > > proper Madhvas. > > > > || Sri Moola Ramo Vijayathe || > > || Sri Raghavendraya namh || > > > > Vasu > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2003 Report Share Posted July 30, 2003 On 7/29/03 5:37 AM, " Rajaraman Nagarajan " <guru_rayar wrote: > Vasu, > 1.I did not send you any official emails on behalf of > SRS Matha. All the emails which were sent by me where > sent on behalf of myself and not SRS Matha > mantralayam.Get that clear in your head. > Dear KrishNa bhaktas, This thread needs to stop immediately. Personal insults and bickering are not allowed in this list. Please take this into personal e-mails between both of you and sort this issue out. Most of the members of the list are not interested in reading this kind of posts. Please take this seriously and create a positive spiritual atmosphere where others can find spiritually uplifting discussions for all of us. As the list administrator, I would like list to be self-regulating, but I will take strict action if necessary. ananta guNa pUrNaya doshadUrAya vishNave | namah sri prANa nAThAya bhaktAbhishTa pradAyine || - Mangala shloka in mundakopanishad khandArtha by Sri Raghavendra Swamiji I salute Lord VishNu who is full of infinite auspicious attributes, without any defects, who is the Lord for Sri (Lakshmi) and mukhya prANa and one who fulfills all the wishes of the devotees. Namaste, Sri KrishNAya namah, Vasu Murthy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2003 Report Share Posted July 30, 2003 Vasu,(Moderator) and Dear All, Thank you for quick response. However I kindly request you to some how ensure that insults and allegations are not posted on this mailing list, contents of which are read by shcolars and few of our Swamijis.especially things which are irrelevant to Bhakthi and Gyana. I would like to apolagize for throwing stone for a stone. I shall in the future refrain from posting any replies to unwarranted alligations and insults. As adviced by many of you from the mailing list to me personally, i shall best be silent. Thanks In service to Hari, Vayu and Guru Rayaru Rajaram --- Shashi and Vasu Murthy <v.murthy wrote: > On 7/29/03 5:37 AM, " Rajaraman Nagarajan " > <guru_rayar wrote: > > > Vasu, > > 1.I did not send you any official emails on behalf > of > > SRS Matha. All the emails which were sent by me > where > > sent on behalf of myself and not SRS Matha > > mantralayam.Get that clear in your head. > > > > Dear KrishNa bhaktas, > This thread needs to stop immediately. > Personal insults and > bickering are not allowed in this list. Please take > this into personal > e-mails between both of you and sort this issue out. > Most of the members > of the list are not interested in reading this kind > of posts. > > Please take this seriously and create a > positive spiritual > atmosphere where others can find spiritually > uplifting discussions for all > of us. As the list administrator, I would like list > to be self-regulating, > but I will take strict action if necessary. > > ananta guNa pUrNaya doshadUrAya vishNave | > namah sri prANa nAThAya bhaktAbhishTa > pradAyine || > > - Mangala shloka in mundakopanishad > khandArtha by Sri > Raghavendra Swamiji > > I salute Lord VishNu who is full of infinite > auspicious attributes, > without any defects, who is the Lord for Sri > (Lakshmi) and mukhya prANa and > one who fulfills > all the wishes of the devotees. > > Namaste, > Sri KrishNAya namah, > > Vasu Murthy > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.