Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Need urgent attention on this matter....

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I was reading an article on Sati system and found this link...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sati_(practice)

 

while going through this article, under the section " Justifications

and criticisms " , I found this below text which says Sri Madwacharya

supported Sati system.. Can someone please comment on this and

immediately rectify the WIKI page? How far is this true that Sri

Madwacharya, our esteemed guru supported Sati system??

 

" Justifications and criticisms

 

Brahmin scholars of the second millennium justified the practice, and

gave reasonings as to how the scriptures could be said to justify

them. Among them were Vijnanesvara, of the Chalukya court, and later

Madhavacharya, theologian and minister of the court of the

Vijayanagara empire, according to Shastri, who quotes their reasoning.

It was lauded by them as required conduct in righteous women, and it

was explained that this was considered not to be suicide (suicide was

otherwise variously banned or discouraged in the scriptures). It was

deemed an act of peerless piety, and was said to purge the couple of

all accumulated sin, guarantee their salvation and ensure their

reunion in the afterlife. "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This system was developed during the ages when Moghuls invaded India and were plundering it.sripathi_k_s <sripathi_k_s wrote: I was reading an article on Sati system and found this link... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sati_(practice) while going through this article, under the section "Justifications and criticisms", I found this below text which says Sri Madwacharya supported Sati system.. Can someone please comment on this and immediately rectify the WIKI

page? How far is this true that Sri Madwacharya, our esteemed guru supported Sati system?? "Justifications and criticisms Brahmin scholars of the second millennium justified the practice, and gave reasonings as to how the scriptures could be said to justify them. Among them were Vijnanesvara, of the Chalukya court, and later Madhavacharya, theologian and minister of the court of the Vijayanagara empire, according to Shastri, who quotes their reasoning. It was lauded by them as required conduct in righteous women, and it was explained that this was considered not to be suicide (suicide was otherwise variously banned or discouraged in the scriptures). It was deemed an act of peerless piety, and was said to purge the couple of all accumulated sin, guarantee their salvation and ensure their reunion in the afterlife."

Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>

> sripathi_k_s <sripathi_k_s wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Madhavacharya, theologian and minister of the court of the

> Vijayanagara empire,

>

>

>

 

I guess the author is referring to some mAdhavAchArya and not our

AchArya, MadhvAchArya.

 

Regards,

Dilip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...