Guest guest Posted September 22, 2007 Report Share Posted September 22, 2007 I was reading an article on Sati system and found this link... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sati_(practice) while going through this article, under the section " Justifications and criticisms " , I found this below text which says Sri Madwacharya supported Sati system.. Can someone please comment on this and immediately rectify the WIKI page? How far is this true that Sri Madwacharya, our esteemed guru supported Sati system?? " Justifications and criticisms Brahmin scholars of the second millennium justified the practice, and gave reasonings as to how the scriptures could be said to justify them. Among them were Vijnanesvara, of the Chalukya court, and later Madhavacharya, theologian and minister of the court of the Vijayanagara empire, according to Shastri, who quotes their reasoning. It was lauded by them as required conduct in righteous women, and it was explained that this was considered not to be suicide (suicide was otherwise variously banned or discouraged in the scriptures). It was deemed an act of peerless piety, and was said to purge the couple of all accumulated sin, guarantee their salvation and ensure their reunion in the afterlife. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 24, 2007 Report Share Posted September 24, 2007 This system was developed during the ages when Moghuls invaded India and were plundering it.sripathi_k_s <sripathi_k_s wrote: I was reading an article on Sati system and found this link... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sati_(practice) while going through this article, under the section "Justifications and criticisms", I found this below text which says Sri Madwacharya supported Sati system.. Can someone please comment on this and immediately rectify the WIKI page? How far is this true that Sri Madwacharya, our esteemed guru supported Sati system?? "Justifications and criticisms Brahmin scholars of the second millennium justified the practice, and gave reasonings as to how the scriptures could be said to justify them. Among them were Vijnanesvara, of the Chalukya court, and later Madhavacharya, theologian and minister of the court of the Vijayanagara empire, according to Shastri, who quotes their reasoning. It was lauded by them as required conduct in righteous women, and it was explained that this was considered not to be suicide (suicide was otherwise variously banned or discouraged in the scriptures). It was deemed an act of peerless piety, and was said to purge the couple of all accumulated sin, guarantee their salvation and ensure their reunion in the afterlife." Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 25, 2007 Report Share Posted September 25, 2007 > > sripathi_k_s <sripathi_k_s wrote: > > > > > Madhavacharya, theologian and minister of the court of the > Vijayanagara empire, > > > I guess the author is referring to some mAdhavAchArya and not our AchArya, MadhvAchArya. Regards, Dilip Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.