Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

!!! Sri 1008 Satyadhyana Teertha Charitra - [Part-6] Resent with correction !!!

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

!!!

Sri Gurubhyo Namaha !!!

!!! Sri Paramagurubhyo Namaha !!!

!!! Srimad Anadateertha Bhagavatpadacharya Gurubhyonamaha !!!

!!! Sri 1008 Satyadhyana Teertha Gurubhyonamaha !!!

 

Namaskara Sri Haribhaktas,The one written in bold is the correction to my earlier mail I thank all the learned members for their feedback and corection.

!!! Haraye Namaha !!!

Chandrika Mandanam Continued…..

 

While delivering his discourse in front of the huge

crowd at Padmasarovar Swamiji has discussed some important topics, which proves

that what written in the CHANDRIKA KHANDANAM is nothing, but utter

false.

 

This is how the discourse goes

Advaita : Advaita teaches that

Jiva and Bramha are inseparable. It is pretended as Tatvamasi. But this is

totally against the shastras and does not have any solid proof to prove the same.

Not only this but it ultimately proves that it is Dwaita only. How it is, let

us discuss further.

 

Tatvamasi, Aham Bramhasmi : "Tvam – Aham" words

which are from Upanishad wrongly understood by Advaita and prove to be scanty

understanding of the intelligence. For this reason this words proved to be

inseparable, because which are separate cannot become one.

 

Say for example if we examine these words Yajamana –

Prastara: In this case, in a yaaga (that possibly lasts for several days), if

the yajamAna is for some reason not available, he is substituted with darbha

and the yaaga is continued without a break. But this does not make a person

equivalent to a darbha. Another example

is another example is

" siMho mANavakaH " . In these examples, there is no identity between the

two words used but it is a " lAxaNika " prayoga. In this example a

brahmin(mANavaka) is said to have qualities of a lion like majesty, ferocity

etc. in both cases there is no identity between those two words. Similarly

Vedic statements that apparently teach Advaita in fact teach similarity etc.

between two objects.This proves that we the human beings can never ever become equal to

Brahma.

 

Advaitis may oppose this and may not accept this.

According to their definition "tat" and "tvam" words and "Aham" and "Brahma"

words represents "Chaitanya" (intelligence). They teach that these words have

similarity between them so it is not separate for them. But this is also not

correct because we cannot equate the meaning of words as per our convenience and

situation. Where as the real meaning of "tat" means "under his control" and

"tvam" means "you are under control of him (Brahma).". "Aham Brahmasmi: means

"I am under his control" / "I cannot live without him"/ " He is always with

me". That's why it is proved that Jiva and Bramha are not same and equal. Our

Srimadacharya also informed us that Jiva and Bramha are real. God's presence

can be found everywhere and that is why he is called "Eko Devaha Sarva Bhuteshu

Gudaha Sarvatra Vyapi Sarva Bhutantaratma Karmadhakshya Sarvabhutadivasi Sakshi

Cheto Kevalo Nirgunascha" etc… The word Nirguna used here does not mean that he

is Sarva-guna-shunya. Because the proof of his Sakshitva Sarvabhutadhivasatva

Karmadhakshyatva Devatva Tridadiguna Vishistatva has been described before

describing him as Nirguna. Where as the meaning of Nirguna word here exactly

means he is above all and free from Satva / Raja and Tama gunas. Sri Adi

Shankarachaya has also explained the same in his Bhashya but it is

mis-understood by others.

 

There are many proofs available for prove that for

Jiva and Bramha are Saguna (real). For example "Vishvam Satyam Maghavana"

(Rigveda 22-4-12). (The other meaning of Maghavana means belonging to or ruled

by Indra). This mantra proves that the whole world is real. This also proves

that the things within the world are also real and not unreal (false). Sri

Vidyaranya has explained this in a different way. He has added Karma word in

front of Vishwa. Which means your Karma is real and not unreal. Even though his

words does not prove the world is real but it says that the Karma made by

Indradi Devatas is real. Even Mahabharata proves us that the qualities by which

god have been praised by his Guna and Dharma are real. This all proves that the

Jiva and Bramha's dharma are not unreal but real, which ultimately proves to us

that JIVA AND ISHA cannot become one. When we take into considerations all

these it is not only proved but real that we can never equalise Jiva and Bramha

as they stand to be separate and can never become one.

 

The other way to prove this is to just look at the

Pancha Bheda summary explained to us by Srimadacharya which belons to our one

of the tenets of siddhanta.

1. jIva-jaDa bheda

2. jaDa-jaDa

bheda

3. jIva-jIva

bheda

4. jIva-Isha

bheda (This tells that Jiva and Brahma can never become one)

5. jaDa-Isha

bheda

The other beauty of the above is Pancha bheda is,

Jiva/Jada/Isha all of them have differences between each other but if we see

minutely we will never find anything like Isha-Isha Bheda. One more proof to

prove that nor Jiva or Jada can equalize Isha (the Supreme God). They are

always separate.

!!!

Haraye Namaha !!!!!! Hari Sarvottama - Vayu Jivottama !!!

!!! Sri Bharatiramama Mukhyapranantargata Sri Krishnarpanamastu !!!

--

Kale Balkrishna

Mobile : +91-9849042501

visit my blog : http://kalebala.wordpress.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...